Data Book. January Budget Office

Similar documents
Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Financing Education In Minnesota

Trends in College Pricing

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

University of Arizona

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes


Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

Educational Attainment

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Foothill College: Academic Program Awards and Related Student Headcount, to

Access Center Assessment Report

Financial Plan. Operating and Capital. May2010

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

Idaho Public Schools

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey Data Collection Webinar

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

Best Colleges Main Survey

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

Evaluation of Teach For America:

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Little Rock, AR

John F. Kennedy Middle School

LIM College New York, NY

46 Children s Defense Fund

FY Matching Scholarship Grant Allocations by County Based on Free and Reduced Lunch (FRL) Population 1

Seminole State College Board Regents Regular Meeting

University of Wyoming Dashboard

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Shelters Elementary School

Report on Academic Recruitment, Hiring, and Attrition

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

School of Medicine Finances, Funds Flows, and Fun Facts. Presentation for Research Wednesday June 11, 2014

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Program budget Budget FY 2013

2015 Annual Report to the School Community

College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

A Diverse Student Body

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Michigan and Ohio K-12 Educational Financing Systems: Equality and Efficiency. Michael Conlin Michigan State University

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Wright State University

3/6/2009. Residence Halls & Strategic t Planning Overview. Residence Halls Overview. Residence Halls: Marapai Supai Kachina

TOPIC: Biennial Exempt Market Salary Survey Report and FY Structures Adjustment

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Transcription:

Data Book January 2007

Introduction The Fort Lewis College Data Book is a compilation of financial information and graphs which can be used to show history and trends in many areas at Fort Lewis College. Assembling the information in a single document aids in dissemination of financial information about the College. The Data Book is updated and reissued each Winter. Information contained in the following tables was prepared by: Pam Davis, Budget Analyst Bryan Eisenbraun, Budget Analyst Michele Peterson, Director of Budgets Jessica Sergeant, Assistant Director of Instituitonal Research Amy Yeager, Director of Institutional Research The Data Book is divided into three sections: Financial Information, Student Information and Staffing Information. Sources of information are listed in the Appendix. Additional detail may be obtained by contacting the. Suggestions for additional information to be included in future editions of the Data Book should be directed to the. Michele Peterson Director of Budgets Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007

Table of Contents Financial Information Education & General Revenue Sources ~ Actual 1 Education & General Expenditures ~ Actual 2 Native American Tuition Waivers and Headcount 3 Tuition Rates ~ Ten-Year History 4 Tuition Rates & Fee Rates ~ Comparison with Selected Colorado Institutions 5 Mandatory Student Fees ~ Ten-Year History 6 Mandatory Student Fee Revenue ~ Five-Year History 7 Room and Board Rates ~ Ten-Year History 8 Room and Board Rates ~ Comparison with Selected Colorado Institutions 9 Grant Activity 10 Student Information Fall Headcount and Fiscal Year Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) 11 Student Residency by State 12 Students by Ethnic Origin 13 Freshman Retention Rates 14 Graduation Rates 15 Staffing Information Education and General Salary Distribution 16 Faculty Salary Increases Compared to Consumer Price Index 17 Faculty Full-Time Equivalent 18 Student Full-Time Equivalent 19 Student Faculty Ratio 20 Faculty by Gender and Rank ~ Five-Year Comparison 21 The Delaware Study 22 Appendix ~ Sources of Information 23 Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007

Education & General Revenue Sources ~ Actual State Net Tuition Native Other Total Revenue FY 93-94 #REF! Revenue #REF! Source by #REF! Fiscal Year#REF! #REF! FY 02-03 $ 7,435,161 $ 13,128,851 $ 6,046,330 $ 1,661,413 $ 28,271,755 Increase 25,000 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! % Increase #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! Thousands 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 State Funding Net Tuition Native American Funding Other Revenue Significance: This graph shows the various sources of Education & General Revenue for the past ten fiscal years. Current Status: In the 2005-06 fiscal year, the funding mechanism for higher education in the State of Colorado changed. In the past years, higher education received state funds through an appropriation. With the implementation of the College Opportunity Fund (COF) program in FY 2005-06, the previously funded amounts were divided into two pots of funding, stipends and Fee for Service. The COF program provides stipend directly to students and the students use those stipends to pay tuition. As a result of this program, tuition revenue increased by the stipend amount. In the charts above, both the increase in tuition revenue and the decrease in State funding are caused by this shift in funding methodologies. Native American Appropriations have doubled in the past ten years due to an increase in Native American students coupled with an increase in tuition rates. Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 1

Education & General Expenditures ~ Actual Significance: This graph represents the percentage of expenditures in each of the standard categories as defined by the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO). It is useful in comparing with expenditures of similar schools, especially in the area of instruction, which is normally the largest amount. Expenditures as presented do not include transfers. Current Status: The percentages shown below have been relatively stable over the past five years. The only significant change is in the area of Scholarships & Fellowships, which more than doubled due to changes in accounting rules causing Native American Tuition Waivers to be counted as scholarships. Operation & Maintenance of Plant 10.0% Institutional Support 12.4% Scholarships & Fellowships 7% Fiscal Year 05-06 Expenditures Instruction 48% Student Services 10.2% Academic Support 12.9% Public Service 0.1% Total Expenditures for FY 05-06 = $30,255,090 Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 2

Native American Tuition Waivers and Headcount Headcount Receiving Waivers 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Native American Student Headcount & Tuition Waivers by Fiscal Year Fall Headcount receiving waivers Total Tuition Waived 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 Thousands Tuition Waived Fiscal Year Significance: The original charter of Fort Lewis College, adopted in 1911, contained a clause stating that "Indian pupils shall at all times be admitted to such school free of charge of tuition... " Fort Lewis College continues to honor this tradition of providing tuition-free education for Native American students. These tuition waivers are funded by the State of Colorado. Current Status: Fall Headcount of Native American students receiving tuition waivers and the amount of tuition waived has increased steadily over the past ten years. The Fall headcount of Native American receiving the tuition waiver students decreased slightly to 693 in FY 05-06 after the jump back up to 703 the prior year. However, income from tuition waivers has continued to rise due to the increase in tuition rates. Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 3

Tuition Rates ~ Ten-Year History FY 94-95 FY 03-04 Total Change % Change Compound Resident 1,558 Tuition Rates 2,270 by Academic 712 Year 45.7% 5.2% Non-Resident $14,000 7,118 11,862 4,744 66.6% 5.8% $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 Resident Non-Resident Tuition Percentage Increase by Academic Year Resident % Increase Denver-Boulder CPI Change Non-Resident % Increase US CPI Change 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 4

Tuition & Fee Rates ~ Comparison with Selected Colorado Institutions FY 06-07 Tuition & Fee Rates Adams State College 2,925 9,351 Mesa State College 3,763 10,982 CSU - Pueblo 3,947 14,515 Western State College 4,117 12,798 Fort Lewis College 3,393 14,061 Resident Non-Resident Resident Tuition & Fee Rates ~ Five-Year Comparison FY 02-03 FY 06-07 Change % Change Adams State College 2,384 2,925 541 22.7% Mesa State College 2,373 3,763 1,390 58.6% CSU - Pueblo 2,651 3,947 1,296 48.9% Western State College 2,499 4,117 1,618 64.7% Fort Lewis College 2,632 3,393 761 28.9% Non-Resident Tuition & Fee Rates ~ Five-Year Comparison FY 02-03 FY 06-07 Change % Change Adams State College 7,424 9,351 1,927 26.0% Mesa State College 7,623 10,982 3,359 44.1% CSU - Pueblo 10,567 14,515 3,948 37.4% Western State College 9,063 12,798 3,735 41.2% Fort Lewis College 10,331 14,061 3,730 36.1% Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 5

Mandatory Student Fees ~ Ten-Year History Significance: Mandatory Student Fees ~ Per Academic Year Student fees are an important source of revenue for the College. This graph shows both the total FY 94-95 03-04 Change % Change growth of student fees over the last decade as well as the change in each individual fee. Current status: Activities & Lift #REF! 134 #REF! #REF! Athletics & Teams #REF! 140 #REF! #REF! Health Center #REF! 49 #REF! #REF! Facility Use #REF! 78 #REF! #REF! Technology Fee #REF! 136 #REF! Student Life Center Fee #REF! 232 #REF! In April of 1998 the students at Fort Lewis College voted in support of a mandatory student fee to finance the construction and operation of the Student Life Center that was phased in over a threeyear period beginning FY 99-00. In June 1998 the Board approved the implementation of the fee. The Student Total Life Center opened September #REF! 2001. 769 #REF! #REF! Effective September, 2004, a Career Services fee of $4.75 per semester was approved. This fee was implemented in order that the Career Services Office might continue to provide professional services to Fort Lewis College students, such as career advising, resume development and oncampus recruiting. In addition increases in the Athletic, Club Sports, Student Life Center and teams fees were approved by the student government effective fall 2006. $1,000 $900 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 Full-Time Student Fees by Academic Year 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 Student Activities & LIFT Athletics & Teams Health Center Facilities Use Technology Fee Student Life Center Fee Career Services Fee Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 6

Mandatory Student Fee Revenue ~ Five-Year History Significance: Student fees are an important source of revenue. This graph displays the actual dollar amount of revenue from each fee over the last five years. Current status: The total revenue from student fees has increased 13% from five years ago. This is attributable to increases in the Student Activities & Lift, Health Center, Technology, Athletic, Sports Teams, Student Life Center and the implementation of the Career Services Fee. Five-Year Revenue Comparison Stud. Act. & Lift Athletics Health Center Facilities Use Technology Fee Student Life Center Career Services Total FY 02-03 547,332 557,243 199,310 335,790 420,007 990,070-3,049,752 FY 06-07 Est. 559,134 683,781 301,251 362,664 527,458 970,194 35,197 3,439,679 $ Increase 11,802 126,538 101,941 26,874 107,451 (19,876) 35,197 389,927 % Increase 2% 23% 51% 8% 26% -2% N/A 13% Thousands $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 Mandatory Student Fee Revenue by Fiscal Year $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 Est. Student Activities & Lift Athletics & Sports Teams Health Center Facilities Use Technology Fee Student Life Center Fee Career Services Fee Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 7

Room and Board Rates ~ Ten-Year History $5,000 Room and Board Rates by Academic Year $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 Room Board 8% Annual Room and Board Percentage Increase by Academic Year Room & Board % Increase US CPI Change Denver-Boulder CPI Change 6% 4% 2% 0% 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 8

Room and Board Rates ~ Comparison with Selected Colorado Institutions Room and Board Combined ~ Academic Year 06-07 Adams State College Mesa State College CSU - Pueblo Western State College Fort Lewis College $4,000 $4,500 $5,000 $5,500 $6,000 $6,500 $7,000 Significance: As with tuition and student fees, room and board rates are compared with similar Colorado institutions to ensure that Fort Lewis College's charges are reasonable within the state market. Current Status: The combined room and board rates for Fort Lewis College increased by 34.7% from six years ago, more than any of the other institutions represented in the above chart. Room rates used are those for residence hall double suites and board rates are for the 14 meal plan or for the plan that falls in the middle, since there are usually three options. Fort Lewis College Fall and Winter terms last 15 weeks, while the other institutions shown operate on a semester basis that lasts 16 weeks. Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 9

Grant Activity Fiscal Year 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 Grants Received Federal Pass Through $ 299,647 $ 371,626 $ 370,979 $ 343,379 $ 452,232 Federal Direct 1,297,693 2,522,278 2,578,799 2,297,590 2,405,272 (excluding financial aid) State 388,606 374,649 141,974 321,767 125,870 Private 118,497 174,543 98,935 382,246 210,789 (excl scholarship donations) Local 109,220 83,325 135,093 71,548 145,688 Total $ 2,213,663 $ 3,526,421 3,325,780 3,416,530 3,339,851 Indirect Cost Recoveries Federal $ 90,765 $ 306,221 162,353 168,691 168,742 State 908 266-28,280 2,707 Private 1,799 19,791 4,604 5,116 2,549 Total $ 93,472 $ 326,277 $ 166,957 $ 202,087 $ 173,998 Grant Activity FY 2005-06 4% 6% 4% 14% 72% Federal Pass Through Federal Direct State Private Local Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 10

Fall Headcount & Fiscal Year Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Fall Headcount & Fiscal Year Student FTE Comparison 5,000 Fall Headcount FY FTE 4,000 3,000 2,000 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 Significance: Fall Headcount is the number of students enrolled for the fall term. Fiscal Year Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) is calculated as the total number of credit hours generated on campus for the fiscal year divided by 30. Current Status: As shown in the graph, the Fall Headcount has steadily decreased over the past five years from 4,425 in FY 01-02 to 3,937 in FY 05-06. Fiscal Year FTE has a similar decrease from 4,168 in FY 01-02 to 3,712 in FY 05-06. The ratio of Resident students to Non-resident students has remained fairly constant over the past decade, with 70% of students coming from Colorado and 30% coming from out-of-state. Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 11

Student Residency by State Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 12

Students by Ethnic Origin Significance: Studying the breakdown of students by ethnicity is important because Fort Lewis College has such a rich cultural heritage and has been recognized as one of the most diverse colleges in the nation. Current Status: Over the past ten years, the number of minority students has increased by 8%, with most of that growth resulting from an increase in Native American students. In the Fall of 1994, Native American students represented 12% of the student population, compared with 18% in Fall 2006. Percentage of Students by Ethnic Origin Fall 2006 Foreign 1% Unanswered 7% White 67% Minority 25% Native American 18% Hispanic 5% Asian American 1% Black 1% Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 13

Freshman Retention Rates Freshman Retention Rates 2005 2004 Cohort 2003 2002 2001 50% 52% 54% 56% 58% 60% A cohort represents all first-time, full-time freshman students who started in the Fall of the year shown. The retention rate shown represents the portion of those students that returned to school the following Fall semester. The retention rate is the percentage of freshmen who continue into their sophomore year at Fort Lewis College. Significance: Freshman retention rates represent a commonly accepted measure of success for first-time, full-time freshman students, and have historically been included in performance measures. Current Status: The College has invested significant efforts over the past few years in developing programs to increase freshman retention and there is evidence of this in the increase from 2001 through 2003. However in 2004 the retention rate dropped by 1% and another 1.6% in 2005. Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 14

Graduation Rates A cohort represents all first-time, full-time freshman students who started in the Fall of the year shown. The graduation rates shown represent those students who graduated within four and six years from Fort Lewis College. Significance: Graduation rates are an important measure of success, much the same as freshman retention rates, and are also included in performance measures. Current Status: The six-year graduation rate for the most recent cohort decreased slightly from previous years. The four year rate has steadily increased since a slight drop in 1999. Four-Year and Six-Year Graduation Rates 2001 2000 1999 Cohort 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 4 Year 6 Year Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 15

Education and General Salary Distribution History FY 96-97 Classified $4,326,000 26% Exempt $3,370,000 18% Faculty $9,141,000 56% FY 05-06 Classified $4,940,860 24% Faculty $10,603,218 51% Exempt $5,414,164 26% Significance: Higher Education is a labor intensive enterprise, and studying the distribution of salary expenses by employee group helps show shifts in the relative position of each category of employee. Seventy-six percent of the current year budget is dedicated to salary and benefit compensation costs. Current Status: Over the past ten years, the percentage of faculty saries has decreased from 56% to 51% of all salaries, whereas the exempt staff share has risen from 18% to 26% and the classified share has dropped from 26% to 24%. Declining enrollment has kept faculty numbers moderate, while significant increases in State and Federal mandates have increased the burden of compliance and necessitated increases in exempt staff. Exempt staff includes all Vice Presidents, Deans, Directors of Co-Operative Education, Center of Southwest Studies, Library, Center for Service Learning, Office of Economic Analysis, Native American Center, Academic Outreach, Institutional Research, Admission, and Hazardous Waste, as well as exempt personnel in the President's Office, Business and Finance, and Student Affairs areas. Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 16

Faculty Salary Increases Compared to CPI Annual Percentage Increases 6% Faculty Salary % Increase Denver-Boulder CPI Change US CPI Change 4% 2% 0% 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 Note: The prepares an annual Faculty Salary Study that compares FLC faculty salary averages to national averages, COPLAC (Council of Public Liberal Arts Colleges) institutions, and similar Colorado institutions. Please contact the for a copy of this study. Cumulative Percentage Increases 160 140 120 113.6 Faculty Salary Cumulative % Increase (base year 94-95) Denver-Boulder CPI Change US CPI Change 118.6 122.1 126.7 130.9 138.3 138.8 144.2 148.5 154.3 100 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 17

Faculty Full-Time Equivalent Faculty FTE by School - FY 05-06 Business Administation 30.6 Natural & Behavioral Sciences Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences 68.7 72.0 General & Exploratory Studies Teacher Education 10.1 19.9 Total 201.3 Faculty FTE by Discipline ~ FY 05-06 Business Administration English Exercise Science Biology Psychology Music Teacher Education Art Social & Human Services Anthropology Geology Writing Program Chemistry Modern Language History Other - Gen Ed, Gen Studies, Honors Freshman Math Math Computer Science Information Systems Accounting Physics Southwest Studies Political Science Philosophy Theatre Economics Engineering Agriculture 7.0 6.9 6.6 6.0 6.0 5.9 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.3 4.7 4.7 4.3 4.2 4.0 3.7 3.4 2.5 2.1 8.6 10.8 10.7 10.3 10.1 9.9 12.4 14.7 17.3 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 18

Student Full-Time Equivalent Student FTE by School - FY 05-06 Business Administation 691.8 Natural & Behavioral Sciences Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences 1,222.0 1,233.5 General & Exploratory Studies Teacher Education 186.0 373.5 Total 3,706.9 Student FTE Production by Discipline ~ FY 05-06 Engineering Agriculture Theatre Southwest Studies Physics Political Science Computer Science Information Systems Other - Gen Ed, Gen Studies, Honors Economics Philosophy Math Music History Freshman Math Chemistry Anthropology Accounting Modern Language Geology Writing Program Art Social & Human Services Biology Teacher Education Psychology Exercise Science English Business Administration 29.5 31.3 32.3 73.0 86.1 89.6 90.2 95.8 95.9 97.2 99.4 106.8 109.0 109.2 109.5 109.5 110.9 123.5 124.6 131.9 159.5 167.7 183.5 186.0 219.8 232.2 269.6 397.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 19

Student Faculty Ratio Student Faculty Ratio by School - FY 05-06 Business Administation 22.6 Natural & Behavioral Sciences Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences General & Exploratory Studies Teacher Education Average 17.8 17.1 18.8 18.5 18.1 Student-Faculty Ratio by Discipline ~ FY 05-06 Theatre Music Engineering Agriculture Anthropology Art Southwest Studies Computer Science Information Systems Biology Math Physics Chemistry History English Teacher Education AVERAGE Exercise Science Freshman Math Social & Human Services Writing Program Psychology Modern Language Political Science Business Administration Accounting Philosophy Geology Economics 8.8 10.5 12.0 14.9 15.9 16.3 17.2 17.3 17.3 17.4 18.6 18.6 18.7 18.7 18.8 18.9 19.1 19.2 19.9 20.2 20.9 21.1 21.7 23.3 23.8 24.7 25.5 29.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 20

Faculty by Gender 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 41 29 Five-Year Comparison Number of Male Faculty 30 26 23 30 8 01-02 05-06 Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Instructor 15 Percentage Increase by Gender FY 99-00 FY 05-06 % Change Total Male Faculty 101 100-1.0% Total Female Faculty 71 86 21.1% Total Faculty 172 186 8.1% 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 15 13 Five-Year Comparison Number of Female Faculty 18 19 30 27 16 01-02 05-06 Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Instructor 27 Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 21

The Delaware Study Significance: The Delaware Study is an analysis of instructional cost and productivity designed by the University of Delaware for FY 04-05. The chart on this page shows the relationship of Fort Lewis College's Direct Instructional Expenditure Per Student FTE in FY 04-05 to the norms of the other Baccalaureate institutions participating in the survey for FY 04-05. Some Departments are included for which no comparative data were available. Current Status: The Direct Instructional Expenditure per Student FTE for Fort Lewis College was only 56% of that for the National Norms on average. The total Direct Instructional Expenditure per Student FTE for FY 04-05 was $3,291. $10,000 Cost per Student FTE by Department Compared to National Baccalaureate Norms, FY 04-05 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $- Accounting Agriculture Anthropology Art Biology Chemistry CSIS Economics Engineering English Exercise Science Geology History Law & Finance Management Marketing Math Modern Language Music FLC Direct Instructional Expenditure per FTE student (FY 04-05) Baccalaureate Norms Direct Instructional Expenditure per FTE student (FY 04-05) PE Philosophy Physics Political Science Psychology Sociology Southwest Studies Teacher Education Theatre Writing Program Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 22

Appendix ~ Sources of Information Financial Information Education & General Revenue Sources ~ Actual Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Other Changes Education & General Expenditures ~ Actual Annual year-end Statement of Current Funds Revenues, Expenditures, and Other Changes (excluding compensated absence expense) Native American Tuition Waivers and Headcount Headcount ~ Enrollment Summary Report prepared by Records Office Tuition Waivers ~ Final Budget Status report Tuition Rates ~ Ten-Year History ~ Fort Lewis College Tuition and Fees schedules Change in CPI ~ Calculated using data from Bureau of Labor Statistics Tuition Rates ~ Comparison with Selected Colorado Institutions ~ CCHE Tuition and Fee Reports Mandatory Student Fees ~ Ten-Year History ~ Fort Lewis College Tuition and Fees schedules Mandatory Student Fees ~ Comparison with Selected Colorado Institutions ~ CCHE Tuition and Fee Reports Mandatory Student Fees Revenue ~ Five-Year History Final Budget Status report through FY 04-05 and Original Operating Budget for FY 05-06 Room and Board Rates ~ Ten-Year History ~ Fort Lewis College Tuition and Fees schedules Change in CPI ~ Calculated using data from Bureau of Labor Statistics Room and Board Rates ~ Comparison with Selected Colorado Institutions ~ CCHE Tuition and Fee Report Grant Activity ~ Institutional Trends Report Indirect Cost Recoveries ~ Final Budget Status Reports Student Information Fall Headcount and Fiscal Year Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) and Fiscal Year FTE Trends by Residency ~ Data reported in accordance with the Colorado Commission on Higher Education (CCHE) Policy for Reporting Full-Time Equivalent Student Enrollment Student Residency by State, Students by Ethnic Origin, Freshman Retention and Graduation Rates ~ Office of Institutional Research, Fall 2005 Staffing Information Education and General Salary Distribution History ~ Fort Lewis College Staffing Patterns Faculty Salary Increases Compared to Consumer Price Index Faculty Salary Percentage Increase ~ Academe data reported by Fort Lewis College Change in CPI ~ Calculated using data from Bureau of Labor Statistics Faculty Full-Time Equivalent, Student Faculty Ratio Student Faculty Ratios are reported based on CCHE guidelines utilizing CIP discipline categories. The data contained in the Data Book differs as follows: (1) The data are presented based on the departments reporting to each dean within three schools, (2) For this report Faculty and Student FTE are accounted for in the faculty member's home department, and (3) The data do not contain information relating to COOP Education or to Library. Faculty FTE data do not count academic administrators who teach classes nor medical replacement positions but do include sabbatical replacement and adds back release time approved. Student FTE data do not include student credit hours generated from remedial courses. These actions are consistent with CCHE reporting requirements. Faculty by Gender and Rank ~ Five-Year Comparison ~ Academe data reported by Fort Lewis College The Delaware Study ~ Data obtained from completion of study workpapers and from the University of Delaware Fort Lewis College Data Book - January 2007 Page 23