Strategic Plan Level (Fill in school name): Lindley Middle School

Similar documents
College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

Strategic Plan Dashboard

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Gifted & Talented. Dyslexia. Special Education. Updates. March 2015!

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

K-12 Math & ELA Updates. Education Committee August 8, 2017

Upward Bound Program

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Brandon Alternative School

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

GRANT WOOD ELEMENTARY School Improvement Plan

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

KDE Comprehensive School. Improvement Plan. Harlan High School

Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

Geographic Area - Englewood

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Comprehensive Progress Report

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

World s Best Workforce Plan

Mark Keppel High School

Mooresville Charter Academy

EVALUATION PLAN

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Kannapolis Charter Academy

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Oakland Terrace School For The Visual And Performing Arts

Executive Summary. Sidney Lanier Senior High School

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

Georgia Department of Education

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

Sidney Sawyer Elementary School

Kahului Elementary School

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan


Hokulani Elementary School

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Georgia Department of Education Title I Schoolwide/School Improvement Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Executive Summary. Vicenza Elementary School

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

Progress or action taken

School Action Plan: Template Overview

1110 Main Street, East Hartford, CT Tel: (860) Fax: (860)

DAS-REMI District Accountability System Reporting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Instrument for the P2E2020SBP

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Race to the Top (RttT) Monthly Report for US Department of Education (USED) NC RttT February 2014

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

AIS/RTI Mathematics. Plainview-Old Bethpage

Two-thirds of APS Schools Increase on State CCRPI Scores

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Week 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth

New Castle Area SD District Level Plan 07/01/ /30/2018

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

State Parental Involvement Plan

International: Three-Year School Improvement Plan to September 2016 (Year 2)

RtI Meeting 9/24/2012. # (Gabel)

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Common Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success

Student Learning Objectives Overview for New Districts

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Executive Summary. Osan High School

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Student Handbook. Supporting Today s Students with the Technology of Tomorrow

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

Clarkstown Central School District. Response to Intervention & Academic Intervention Services District Plan

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Humanitas A. San Fernando High School. Smaller Learning Community Plan. Azucena Hernandez, Redesign Team. Bob Stromoski, Redesign Team

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Geographic Area - Englewood

Transcription:

Strategic Plan Level (Fill in school name): Lindley Middle School (Middle School) 2015-16 Cobb County School District Strategic Plan Long Range Board Goal 1: Vary learning experiences to increase success in college and career pathways. District Focus Areas and Priorities 2016-2019 2015-16 Aligned Actions and Measurements (Due June 30, 2015) Focus Focus Area: Vary learning experiences to increase success in college and career pathways. Focus Priorities: (Based on priorities identified by IE 2, AdvancEd-AdvEd, Superintendent-S, and Division-AD) 1. Organize student performance data through CTLS for full accessible use by teachers and school leaders. (S) (AdvED) Key Actions: (List as many actions as needed in each box.) Provide training on CTLS for teachers during professional development sessions. Utilize the district technology integration specialist in our school for daily support. Measured by: (Formative and/or Summative) Student Learning Objectives Flexible Formative Touchstone Owner(s): Teacher Leaders Resources Needed: 1.CTLS Training 2. I-Response Kits and Training 3. Computer Access Of Key Actions: (Due June 15, 2016) Priority Status: NM = Not Met = In Progress M = Met 2. Organize, examine, and adjust instruction based on student progress monitoring data. (AD) Analyze assessments in content areas, connection classes and data summits monitored through use of CTLS and other technology resources. Provide professional development on the data team process and analyzation of student data for identified teachers. Student Learning Objectives Flexible Formative Touchstone Support Personnel Planning Periods

3. Develop and deliver flexible formative assessments in all core content areas for monitoring student progress and adjusting instruction to meet individual student learning needs. (S) Use the CTLS to create common assessments for all content areas. Evaluate data from each summative assessment and adjust instructional practices. Monitor the use and collaboration of weekly content and data team meetings. and Data Meetings Minutes Student Learning Objectives planning for content teams Data summits Flexible Formative Touchstone 4. Align critical professional learning by grade level/content area and ensure access for all teachers. (AD) Differentiate professional development sessions based on individual teachers needs. Teacher Keys Effectiveness.N/A

5. Increase percentage of students reading on grade level. (S) (Based on CCRPI 2014 Reading Scores) Analyze data from Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) adjust instruction based on Lexile levels. Differentiate students learning experiences based on data from balanced assessment. Scholastic Reading Inventory District Adopted Resources Create a Language Arts Connection Class. Flexible Formative Touchstone 6. Increase percentage of student performance in math/algebra at every grade level. (S) (Based on CCRPI ES-MS Math & HS Algebra Scores) Provide 7 th and 8 th Grade Sheltered ESOL Math Classes. Provide Two Math Connection Classes. Provide tutoring and Saturday School all students not mastering standards on summative assessments. Implement student Interactive Notebook usage within all math classes. Scholastic Math Inventory Flexible Formative Touchstone Math Student Grades 7. Increase number of students academically completing every grade.(s) Increase instruction through EOG prep time. Utilize RTI process and monitor students academic performance. ACCESS RTI Data Student Grades Counselors RTI Data Gradebook

8. Other: (Priorities specific to school, division, or area. Can be multiple.) Implement Technology Integration Initiative. Implement Arts Integration Initiative. Develop Project Based Learning Performance Tasks. Meeting Minutes Lesson plans Walkthroughs and Formative Evaluations ipads imacs laptops Nooks Computer labs Long Range Board Goal 2: Differentiate resources for students based on needs. District Focus Areas and Priorities 2016-2019 2015-16 Aligned Actions and Measurements (Due June 30, 2015) Focus Focus Area: Differentiate resources for students based on needs. Focus Priorities: (Based on priorities identified by IE 2, AdvancEd-AdvED, Superintendent-S, and Division-AD) Identify local school innovations through system flexibility to increase student achievement. (IE 2 ) Key Actions: (List as many actions as needed in each box.) Use Technology to differentiate, extend and reinforce the content and allow student exploration. Measured by: (Formative and/or Summative) Meeting Minutes Lesson plans Owner(s): Resources Needed: ipads, imac Computers Of Key Actions: (Due June 15, 2016) Priority Status: NM = Not Met = In Progress M = Met Integrate Visual and Performing Arts in the content area assignments and assessments. Walkthroughs and Formative Evaluations Team ipad Charging Carts Use Project Based Learning in content areas to develop rigorous, engaging studentcentered assignments. Technology software

Divisionally support local school innovations identified through system flexibility for increasing student achievement. (IE 2 ) Provide targeted resources for students: 1. not reading on grade level (Lexile) 2. unsuccessful in Math/Algebra (Based on 2014 CCRPI Math/Algebra scores) 3. not on-track for graduation (S) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Provide Remedial Math and ELA Connection Classes. Utilize the RTI interventions and strategies to make modifications. Provide supplemental technology resources for tutorial and remedial support. Scholastic Reading Inventory Scholastic Math Inventory Data from CTLS Counselors Supplemen tal technology resources Review students academic progress during Conference Week; review special education students progress reports and review nine week progress reports. Meeting Minutes Lesson plans Walkthroughs and Formative Evaluations Special Education Progress Reports Identify and provide resources to increase opportunities for advanced, onlevel, and remedial students to earn initial credit, embedded credit, dual credit, recovered credit, distance learning, and certifications in areas of student interest. (AD) ACCESS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Other: (Priorities specific to school, division, or area. Can be multiple.) Implement Technology, Art Project Based Learning Initiatives. Meeting Minutes Lesson plans Support from district leadership Walkthroughs and Formative Evaluations

Long Range Board Goal 3: Develop stakeholder involvement to promote student success. District Focus Areas and Priorities 2016-2019 2015-16 Aligned Actions and Measurements (Due June 30, 2015) Focus Focus Area: Develop stakeholder involvement to promote student success. Focus Priorities: (Based on priorities identified by IE 2, AdvancEd-AdvEd, Superintendent-S, and Division-AD) Seek and evaluate stakeholder input for critical processes. (AdvED) Key Actions: (List as many actions as needed in each box.) Analyze data results from Parent Survey. Analyze data results from Climate Surveys. Measured by: (Formative and/or Summative) 2014 SACS/ Advanced-ED Survey Owner(s): School Counselors Resources Needed: N/A of Key Actions: (Due June 15, 2016) Priority Status: NM = Not Met = In Progress M = Met Other: (Priorities specific to school, division, or area. Can be multiple.) Meet with PTSA and School Council. Comments and Reviews from Members Parent Liaison NA

Long Range Board Goal 4: Recruit, hire, support and retain employees for the highest level of excellence. District Focus Areas and Priorities 2016-2019 2015-16 Aligned Actions and Measurements (Due June 30, 2015) Focus Focus Area: Recruit, hire Support and retain employees for highest levels of excellence. Focus Priorities: (Based on priorities identified by IE 2, AdvancEd-AdvED, Superintendent-S, and Division-AD) Seek and hire teachers who meet the qualifications for a highly effective teacher. (IE 2 ) Seek and hire school administrators who meet the qualifications for a highly effective school leader and who are best suited for the school s environment. (IE 2 ) Support local school teachers and leaders to improve retention rate. (IE 2 ) (S) Ensure that teachers are highly trained in the standards, learning engagement strategies, formative assessments, and student progress monitoring. (AD) Key Actions: (List as many actions as needed in each box.) Utilize a Multi-level Interview Process: Interview 1:Applicants interviewed by teacher leaders and Interview 2: Applicants interviewed by and demonstrate teaching practices through a mine lesson. Develop a Professional Development Calendar that support school initiatives, specific student groups and teacher needs. Measured by: (Formative and/or Summative) TKES based rubric Owner(s): Teacher Leaders Resource s Needed: STAR Data Base of Key Actions: (Due June 15, 2016) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Provide Peer Mentors, Use Data Team Process, Provide Planning. Teacher Performance from TKES CCSD and GaDOE Teacher Leaders District Support through Expert Leaders Priority Status: NM = Not Met = In Progress M = Met Fully implement and evaluate state system of teacher and leaders evaluation (TKES and LKES). N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Use results of TKES and LKES to improve professional performance (IE 2 ) Other: (Specific to school, division, or area. Can be more than one.) Focus on identified standards in need of improvement for individual teachers. Identify teacher leaders based on positive results from TKES evaluations. TKES Data Teacher Performa nce from TKES District Support Key Trend Data (Middle) Indicator 2012 2013 2014 2015 2014 District Mean Elem. Middle High 4-Year Graduation Rate (Data Source: CCRPI) 5-Year Graduation Rate (D.S: CCRPI) Lexile Levels 5 th grade (D.S.: CCRPI) Lexile Levels 8 th grade (D.S.: CCRPI) Lexile Levels 11 th grade (D.S: CCRPI) On-Track for Graduation N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 78.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 78.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A 75.0% N/A N/A 67.8% 65.3% 74.9% N/A N/A 85.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 56.4% N/A N/A 74.8% 58.7% 90.0% 88.0% 78.0%

Career Ready Advanced s Stakeholder Satisfaction (Annual AdvancED Survey) 71.7% 100% 90.7% 99.3% 93.6% 99.2% 55.0% 38.8% 41.9% 38.8% 31.0% 15.0% 40.0% 50.0% N/A 80.7% 65.6% 61.0% 89% 76.0% 73.0% CCRPI Score 69.1 76.6 68.6 N/A 75.7 80.0 77.7 Iowa Reading Grade 3 Iowa Reading Grade 7 N/A N/A N/A N/A 57.5% N/A N/A 35% 32.0% 26.9% 20.8% N/A 47.9% N/A Middle School Level Calculation Guide Indicator Description Numerator Denominator Details and Data Sources Lexile Levels Middle Schools Percent of students in grade 6, 7, 8 achieving a Lexile measure greater than or equal to the following on the EOG: grade 6: 917, grade 7: 984, grade 8: 1050 Students scoring a Lexile measure 917 (6th) 984 (7th) 1050 (8th) Students with a valid Lexile score on the EOG Data for this element is extracted from the EOG data file and include students with valid scores. On-Track for Graduation Percent of students in grade 8 passing at least four courses in core content areas (ELA, Math, Science, Social Studies, and World Language) Unduplicated count of grade 8 students passing courses in four core content areas (ELA, Math, Science, Social Studies, and World Language) Total enrollment in grade 8 Data extracted from Synergy Gradebook Career Ready Percent of students with a complete statedefined Individual Graduation Plan by the end of grade 8 Unduplicated count of students in grade 8 with a complete IGP Total enrollment in grade 8 Will be collected via Student Records Advanced s Percent of students enrolled in Middle School AC classes Unduplicated count of students in grades 6-8 enrolled in Middle School AC classes Total Enrollment of grades 6-8 Course information in Synergy Stakeholder Aggregate of all positive responses to all items Number of positive ("Strongly Total number of responses School Improvement Survey

Satisfaction included on the AdvancEd surveys (parents, students, staff) Agree" and "Agree") responses on the AdvancEd surveys excluding "No Answer" or "No Basis to Judge" Report, Page 2 - Provided by the Office of Accountability Iowa Reading Grade 7 Percentage of students in grade 7, scoring ongrade level in reading Number of 7 th grade students scoring on-grading in reading Number of 7 th grade students with a valid test score in reading Riverside Data Manager CCRPI State accountability system whereby Georgia schools earn up to 100 points, based on required performance measurements NA NA Georgia DOE