Non-Academic Assessment

Similar documents
Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Division of Student Affairs Annual Report. Office of Multicultural Affairs

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Complete the pre-survey before we get started!

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Assessment Report Univ. North Carolina Asheville SA - Dean of Students

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Using the Academic Recovery Guide... 4

Upward Bound Program

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

NTU Student Dashboard

RESIDENCE DON APPLICATION

SERVICE-LEARNING Annual Report July 30, 2004 Kara Hartmann, Service-Learning Coordinator Page 1 of 5

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

COMMUNICATION PLAN. We believe that all individuals are valuable and worthy of respect.

Xenia High School Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Application

School Leadership Rubrics

University of Essex Access Agreement

Academic Advising Manual

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

College Action Project Worksheet for CAP Projects March 18, 2016 Update

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

Millersville University Degree Works Training User Guide

Assessing the Impact of an Academic Recovery Program

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Options for Tuition Rates for 2016/17 Please select one from the following options, sign and return to the CFO

University of Texas Libraries. Welcome!

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

Utica College Web Policies and Guidelines

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Office: Bacon Hall 316B. Office Phone:

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Second Grade Saigling Elementary Back to School Night August 22nd, 2017

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

Ministry of Education, Republic of Palau Executive Summary

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Student Handbook Information, Policies, and Resources Version 1.0, effective 06/01/2016

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

SORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS FLORIDA GREEK STANDARDS ACCREDITATION PROGRAM FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

+ Restorative Justice: An Anthology

Table of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.

LAKEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES CODE LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR POLICY #4247

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Registration Information. Spring 2017 Registration Information 4100 South 4 th Street Leavenworth, KS 66048

Intermediate Algebra

Registration Information. Summer and Fall 2016 Registration Information 4100 South 4 th Street Leavenworth, KS 66048

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

Person Centered Positive Behavior Support Plan (PC PBS) Report Scoring Criteria & Checklist (Rev ) P. 1 of 8

FAU Mobile App Goes Live

STABILISATION AND PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN NAB

Distinguished Teacher Review

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH VETERANS SUPPORT CENTER

PROVIDING AND COMMUNICATING CLEAR LEARNING GOALS. Celebrating Success THE MARZANO COMPENDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES

MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE: PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADUATE MANUAL

PROFESSIONAL INTEGRATION

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

SCHOOL EXEC CONNECT WEST ST. PAUL-MENDOTA HEIGHTS-EAGAN AREA SCHOOLS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH FOCUS GROUP FEEDBACK January 12, 2017

MPA Internship Handbook AY

Student Transportation

Writing Research Articles

WP 2: Project Quality Assurance. Quality Manual

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

08-09 DATA REVIEW AND ACTION PLANS Candidate Reports

Social Justice Practicum (SJP) Description

IDS 240 Interdisciplinary Research Methods

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Version Number 3 Date of Issue 30/06/2009 Latest Revision 11/12/2015 All Staff in NAS schools, NAS IT Dept Head of Operations - Education

Student Success and Academics

Student-Athlete. Code of Conduct

Race to the Top (RttT) Monthly Report for US Department of Education (USED) NC RttT February 2014

Emergency Safety Interventions: Requirements

Northwestern University School of Communication

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. Education Leadership Program Course Syllabus

Academic Support Services Accelerated Learning Classes The Learning Success Center SMARTHINKING Student computer labs Adult Education

Casual, approximately 8 hours per week. Director, CLIPP. Employee Name Signature Date

Transcription:

1 P age Non-Academic Assessment AMBASSADOR TRAINING GUIDE

2 P age Non-Academic Assessment Ambassador Program Purpose of the program: 1. Help non-academic (non-credit) areas develop, refine, and communicate their assessment processes. 2. Help non-academic (non-credit) areas use Taskstream. Role of the Ambassadors: 1. Help areas: o Develop goals, outcomes, measures, and targets o Document findings and action plans 2. Help areas involve staff in the assessment process and share results across campus. Ambassadors: 1. Administrative Services Amanda Crump Megan Warren Sean Conklin 2. Student Affairs Kristen Roberts Teresa Minckler John Kennedy 3. Academic Support Services Johanna Lee, Chair Patrick Massaro Erin Lassial

3 P age INTRODUCTION What defines good assessment? One that is: Meaningful To those doing it, informs decision making Inclusive Involves all staff and helps them understand why they do what they do and how it relates to the big picture for their area Flexible and Systematic Assessment informs our work and our work informs assessment Understandable By others (inside and outside of the department) Mission-focused Used to measure the most important functions of the department A culture of assessment is created by: Communicating measures, targets, and findings with staff and to relevant areas outside the department that would benefit from your findings Completing and sharing mid-year findings Reviewing, collaborating, discussing, and confirming as a team what your area (or services) are doing why you are doing it Celebrating and discussing progress at staff meetings BEST PRACTICES SCHEDULE OF NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT June Enter Assessment Findings and Actions for the completed AY. January Enter mid-year findings. Complete year-end report. Create Assessment Plan for the coming AY.

4 P age TASKSTREAM DEFINITIONS STANDING REQUIREMENTS: Standing requirements include the mission statement, goals, and outcomes of an area. These should be broad and general statements that hold true year after year. They do not need to be updated yearly however, they should be reviewed regularly. MISSION: In short, the mission communicates why an area exists on campus and what the primary function of that area is. It should be short and concise. It should apply to the area year after year, yet, should be reviewed periodically, reviewed, and discussed. GOAL: This is the big picture of what your department does and should support the mission of the department. It is the same, year after year, yet should be looked at periodically, reviewed and discussed. Goals must tie to the institution s strategic goals, such as student success (retention). OUTCOME: As a result of achieving this big picture (these goals), what would you like to see happen? YEARLY ASSESSMENT PLANS & FINDINGS: Yearly assessment plans and findings reflect short term actions or activities that are implemented as means for accomplishing goals and outcomes. These will change year to year and are the areas of Taskstream that you will update on an ongoing basis to reflect progress. MEASURE AND TARGETS: How will you make this (the outcome) happen? What will you do this year? Measure: Think beyond your daily business and focus on those things that will really move your department forward to meet your goals. What new initiatives, significant improvements, or strategies to meet challenges would advance the goals of your department and move it forward? Measures will include the thing(s) that you will do to reach your outcome. Describe your measure and include rationale for what and why you are doing what you are doing. Target: How will you know that you have been successful (or not)? Targets should be quantifiable, i.e., percentage, number, relative change. Include timeframe or target date. FINDINGS: What happened? Results; data, from IR (retention rates, enrollment numbers, graduation rates, etc), satisfaction, # of users, types of services accessed by users, demographics of users, revenue generated, what learners are able to do or know. ACTIONS: (Institutional Scorecard, Planning) As the result of your findings, what are you going to do? Do the findings indicate a simple fix, a tweak or a need to revisit the measure/targets and do something different? If the action required is significant, you may want to include it in the following year s assessment plan. TASKSTREAM CYCLE OF ASSESSMENT

5 P age Assessment Plan Measures & Targets: What actions you will implement to achieve established outcomes and how will you measure them. Institutional Scorecard: Actions: Based on assessment findings, what changes will you make to your measures and targets for next year? Mission Goals Outcomes Assessment Findings: What happened as a result of your actions (measures)? Did you meet the target? EXAMPLES

6 P age EXAMPLE #1: Residence Life GOAL: Retain students OUTCOME: Increase occupancy MEASURE: Improve MTS follow up program Description of Measure: When students are having attendance or academic issues in a class faculty have the ability to refer them through the Moving Toward Success (MTS) system. MTS referrals are sent to many stakeholders including academic advisors, athletic coaches, residence hall directors and the student. Residence Hall Directors receive weekly MTS referrals for the students in their building. They are expected to follow up with students on all new referrals each week. The goal of this program is to improve student retention which can increase future residence hall occupancy. Target: 60% of students referred through the MTS system will be contacted/meet with their Residence Hall Directors. FINDINGS: Findings for Improve MTS follow up program Summary of findings: Not met, 601 out of 1,458 (41%) of MTS referrals were followed up on by the residence life staff. Results: Target Achievement: Not Met Use of Results for Program Improvement: Reflections/Notes: 60% may be unrealistic because many students receive multiple referrals which the staff combine into one meeting with that student. ACTIONS: Action: Follow up on all Moving Toward Success referrals for residential students. Action Details: Residence life staff will follow up with all new MTS referrals on a weekly basis. They will attempt to meet with each student to discuss the referral and offer assistance. A log is kept by each staff member, all logs are combined at the end of each semester. Implementation Plan: Each semester Key/Responsible Personnel: Residence Life staff Measures: The number of MTS referrals and meetings are compared year to year. EXAMPLE #2: Tutoring Services

7 P age GOAL: Augment student learning opportunities and enhance academic skills. OUTCOME: Student learning opportunities are available through open access to tutoring and learning resources MEASURE: Improve student log in Description of Measure: Offering a variety of hours for students to access tutors and resources encourages students to seek help when they need it and as often as they need it. During the academic calendar of the fall and spring semesters, the Tutoring Center will offer services to students on a walk-in basis in the following locations; Math & Science Lab, Engineering Lab, Writing Center, Business & Accounting Lab, and Late Night Learning Lab. Students will log in at arrival and out at departure. Log in data provides the courses students came for assistance with as well as number of visits by number of students by lab. This information assists with planning for coverage, hiring tutors, and course coverage. Anecdotally it has been found that on this campus, students are most likely to access tutoring when it is offered on a walk-in basis. Tutoring that is scheduled by appointment is subject to a high number of no-shows on the part of the student. Students tend to seek help at the time that they need it and therefore having a variety of hours and offerings assists students in accessing the proper help when they need it. Target: 1. Greater than 50% of enrolled students will access tutoring services. 2. Log in reports will show a distribution of log in times indicating days and times of heavy traffic. 3. Tutoring center staff will prompt students each hour to log in when doing head counts. FINDINGS: Findings for Improve student log in Summary of findings: 1. A total of 1,056 students visited the Tutoring Center this academic year, reflecting a participation rate of 33%. 2. Log in reports were generated for each lab and for the Tutoring Center as a whole that showed trends and volume of student traffic. 3. Tutoring Center staff were instructed to prompt students each hour to log in when doing head counts. Results: Target Achievement: Not Met Use of Results for Program Improvement: The target of 50% participation was set based on students served data collected via the previous database, which provided only aggregate lab data for students served. This provided an inflated number. The data provided by TutorTrac this year is more accurate; therefore, the students served target will need to be adjusted accordingly. Logins by hour show that the period of heaviest traffic in general is between the hours of 10 AM and 2 PM. Individual lab traffic is consistent with a few notable exceptions. The Engineering Lab traffic is greatest between 9 AM and 12 PM. The Late Night Learning Lab is busiest between 6 and 9 PM. Although Sundays have higher levels of late-night

8 P age ACTIONS: traffic, the 11 PM-12 AM hour is particularly quiet in the Late Night Lab, averaging roughly 1.6 logins per night. This data will be used to help guide staff scheduling. Reflections/Notes: TutorTrac has already begun to provide more consistent and reliable data. Next year will be the first opportunity to compare data collected using the same system. Action: Improve data collection Action Details: 1. Continue TutorTrac 2. Amend the head count instrument so that it provides cumulative head counts by lab. 3. Increase student satisfaction survey participation. 4. Improve the login rate by prompting students each hour when the head count is completed in each lab. Implementation Plan: Ongoing Key/Responsible Personnel: 1. Illissa - TutorTrac System Administrator 2. Tamra Woodrow 3. All coordinators 4. All coordinators Measures: 1. TutorTrac will provide more accurate and comprehensive data reports. 2. Cumulative head counts will be calculated for each lab. 3. A total of 350 surveys will be completed. 4. Log in rates will be more accurate.

9 P age Goal Big picture of what you do year after year - core goals of your department "Promote healthy lifestyles for students" Outcome What do you want to see happen as a result of achieving this goal? "Promote smoking cessation" "Educate students on sexual wellness" Subcategories under the umbrella goal Measure & Target How will you know that you have accomplished this outcome? How will you annually measure your success? Measure - Implement smoking cessation campaign. Send direct mailing to all students on campus making them aware of smoking cessation resources and workshops (3 offered each semester). Target - "Smoking rates among students on campus will go down by 2% in Fall 2016" Findings What happened? "Smoking rates among students on campus for Fall 2016-14%, down from 15% in Fall 2015" Action Based on what happened, what are you going to do? "Comments on the survey indicate that students do not believe e-cigarettes are harmful to health and are using those instead of traditional cigarettes. Implement e-cig campaign to decrease e-cigarette usage to 8% (currently 10% of smokers use e- cigarettes).

10 P age Goal Big picture of what you do year after year - core goals of your department "Provide quality customer service to students, faculty, and staff" Outcome What do you want to see happen as a result of achieving this goal? "Increase the ease of administrative functions (drop/add, change of major, etc.) for students Subcategories under the umbrella goal Measure & Target How will you know that you have accomplished this outcome? How will you annually measure your success? Measure - Implement electronic process for student drop/add forms for Spring 2016 - this will aid students in being able to send forms to advisors, Dean's office, and Registrar without needing to physically find faculty member, and will be more accessible to fully-online students. Currently, some students miss the deadline to drop courses because they are unable to locate their advisor by the drop date. Target - 80% of students will rate that they are 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with the processes of changing major and the process of dropping/adding a course on the Spring One Hop Shop Survey (compared to 60% in Spring 2015). Findings What happened? "75% of students rated that they were 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with the process of changing their major, and 85% of students rated that they were 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with the process of adding/dropping a course in the Spring 2016 One Hop Shop Survey Action Based on what happened, what are you going to do? "Comments on the survey indicate that students did not find the change of major form to be very user-friendly, and for students who changed to a major outside of their school, the approval process between Deans did not work properly. The form needs to be redeveloped to allow for greater ease of use.

11 P age Goal Big picture of what you do year after year - core goals of your department "Retain a qualified and diverse staff" Outcome What do you want to see happen as a result of achieving this goal? "Foster a sense of community for new hires" Subcategories under the umbrella goal Measure & Target How will you know that you have accomplished this outcome? How will you annually measure your success? Measure - "Host welcome luncheon for new faculty and their mentors after the 2nd week of classes to allow opportunity to discuss challenges, find solutions, build relationships." - Include all faculty hired in last 3 years as "new faculty." Target - New faculty retention rate of 90% for the Fall 2013 and Fall 2014 cohorts as of Fall 2015 Findings What happened? "Faculty retention rate for Fall 2013 cohort = 80%; Fall 2014 cohort = 90%" Action Based on what happened, what are you going to do? "The survey given at the end of the first year of the program indicated that most new faculty had questions at the end of the first day of classes and really needed the assistance of their mentor or other faculty at that time. Next year, host an additional lunch on the 2nd day of classes to allow for those questions to be answered earlier.

12 P age PRACTICE FLOWCHART Goal What are you going to do year after year - what is the big picture or core goals of your department? Outcome What do you want to see happen as a result of achieving this goal? Measure & Target How will you know that you have accomplished this outcome? How will you annually measure your success? Findings What happened? Action Based on what happened, what are you going to do?

13 P age Taskstream Assessment Plan & Findings Worksheet General Information Area: Assessment Point Person: Taskstream UN & PW: Assessment Cycle year: Assessment Ambassador: Ambassador Contact Info: Notes: Taskstream Standing Requirements Area Mission: Goals: 1. 2. 3.

14 P age ASSESSMENT PLAN FINDINGS PER MEASURE GOAL # : OUTCOME # : Measure: Description of Measure: _ Target: Where Taught: Where Evaluated: Implementation Plan (timeline): Findings: Summary of Findings: Results: Use for Program Improvement: Reflections/Notes: Substantiating Evidence: