128 responses Summary See complete responses Section I Student Name and Class: Yeo Wei Jie J Chua Soon Ho, fmd 312 Dino Ong S76006 AEDF912 Ramli Bin Mohamad @Berg AEDP1011 Marcus Sim Pei Yu FMD 313 S76061 Gareth See / FMD313 Daniel Chua Kia Kun fmd 313 jowenson ian sy s76017 fmd912 Shaun Andy Valentino Ramachandran AEDF712 Quek Yee Hao AEDF712 Varun Shrilal AEDF912 Jova Rovoy FMD912 Jonathan Gwee AEDP1012 Shashank.S BABS513 Ravindra vader. AEDP1012 Ravindra vader. AEDP1012 s76108 Michael Chua - AEDF712 Nur Idayu Binte Abdul Rahman, FMD312 Yeo Yong Lian AEDF313 S76052 Aidil Muhaimin Bin Ramlee S75836 BABS1112 Mathias oh DIT313 Chan Tsun Yean AEDF313 David Gan, FMD313 Mohammad hanif bin ha... Question 1 - Course content and structure 2 2 2% 3 18 14% 4 82 64% 5 26 20% Question 1 - Relation to the industry/ "hands on" training 2 4 3% 3 27 21% 4 43 34% 5 54 42% Question 1 - Theoretical content put into practice (preparation / guidance) 2 2 2%
3 22 17% 4 85 66% 5 18 14% Question 1 - Quality of written exams (incl. preparation and feedback) 2 6 5% 3 33 26% 4 72 56% 5 16 13% Question 1 - Quality of teaching material (handouts, scripts, etc.) 2 6 5% 3 23 18% 4 73 57% 5 25 20% Question 1 - Quality and choice of equipment / hardware 1 4 3% 2 9 7% 3 31 24% 4 71 55% 5 13 10% Question 1 - Quality and choice of software
2 4 3% 3 18 14% 4 46 36% 5 59 46% Question 1 - Availability of workstations and studios 1 4 3% 2 15 12% 3 31 24% 4 60 47% 5 18 14% Question 1 - State of equipment and work places (repair/maintenance) 1 4 3% 2 12 9% 3 25 20% 4 69 54% 5 18 14% Question 1 - Overall atmosphere in your class 1 2 2% 2 2 2% 3 19 15% 4 73 57% 5 32 25%
Question 1 - Value for money 2 10 8% 3 30 23% 4 76 59% 5 12 9% Question 1 - Flexibility offered by different class times 2 9 7% 3 26 20% 4 71 55% 5 22 17% Question 1 - Quality of the administration / management 2 6 5% 3 21 16% 4 72 56% 5 29 23% Question 1 - Environment management system (cleanliness of campus, no smoking, fire drill, recycling etc...) 3 9 7% 4 40 31% 5 78 61%
Question 1 - Effectiveness of communicative channels (adequate, relevant and effective) 2 3 2% 3 20 16% 4 77 60% 5 28 22% Question 1 - Pre-course counseling experience 1 2 2% 2 6 5% 3 36 28% 4 66 52% 5 18 14% Question 1 - Quality of our library and student lounge 1 3 2% 2 12 9% 3 37 29% 4 29 23% 5 47 37% Question 1 - Standard and quality of student support services 2 5 4% 3 27 21% 4 40 31% 5 55 43%
Question 1 - Overall satisfaction of SAE Institute 2 2 2% 3 21 16% 4 86 67% 5 19 15% Overall satisfaction of Recruitment Agent (if any) 3 13 10% 4 16 13% 5 8 6% Overal satisfaction of our Pastoral Counseling (if any) 3 15 12% 4 14 11% 5 7 5% Section II How did you initially find out about SAE Institute? friends/acquaintances ("word of mouth") 61 48% newspaper or magazine adverts 0 0% fair/exposition 0 0% internet 63 49% career guidance 4 3% public transport ad 0 0%
Besides your personal interest in the chosen field, why did you primarily decide to study at SAE Institute? recommendation from the industry 13 10% course concept (content, duration, hands on,...) 44 34% equipment/facilities 3 2% opportunity to attend an international institution 2 2% diploma and degree possibilities 57 45% no alternatives / only available school 9 7% How do you principally finance your course? bank loan 18 14% state loan or grant 2 2% personal savings 25 20% family / friend (private sources) 77 60% wages 2 2% company pays (employment) 2 2% own company pays 2 2% How much time per week on average (including lessons and practical time) do you spend on your course? 15 hours max. 8 6% about 20 hours 28 22% about 25 hours 47 37% about 30 hours 19 15% over 40 hours 26 20%
How much time per week on average (including lessons and practical time) do you spend on your course? 15 hours max. 6 5% about 20 hours 19 15% about 25 hours 54 42% about 30 hours 10 8% over 40 hours 12 9% Would you recommend this course to others? Yes 119 93% No 9 7% Any additional comments you have regarding SAE Institute or your course? To have more Live Sound Reinforcement courses.attachment will be ideal too. assignments Great environment to do my own Most of the Mac always has playback issue with Java or any other required plugin used on adobe products and constantly asking for admin password in order to run them. Random adobe version numbers on different mac. cs4.cs6.etc It would be nice to have more studios for proper mixing and recording. Signal flow tests and practice for semester 1 students can be done in a separate area as they do not need studio environment in terms of acoustics to practice and to take the test, hen... Section III - Please give an assessment of instructors from your course Only comment on those teachers who taught you!
Audio, Christelle Taillens - (specific) subject knowledge 2 2 2% 3 9 7% 4 25 20% 5 50 39% Audio, Christelle Taillens - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 23 18% 4 27 21% 5 36 28% Audio, Christelle Taillens - lecture preparation 3 9 7% 4 34 27% 5 43 34% Audio, Christelle Taillens - lecture presentation (organization, interesting, etc) 3 12 9% 4 32 25% 5 42 33%
Audio, Christelle Taillens - punctuality 3 6 5% 4 18 14% 5 63 49% Audio, Christelle Taillens - Overall satisfaction rate 3 11 9% 4 38 30% 5 36 28% Audio, Patrick Fernando - (specific) subject knowledge 3 12 9% 4 17 13% 5 39 30% Audio, Patrick Fernando - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 12 9% 4 10 8% 5 47 37%
Audio, Patrick Fernando - lecture preparation 3 21 16% 4 20 16% 5 27 21% Audio, Patrick Fernando - lecture presentation (organization, interesting, etc) 3 16 13% 4 21 16% 5 32 25% Audio, Patrick Fernando - punctuality 3 16 13% 4 18 14% 5 33 26% Audio, Patrick Fernando - Overall satisfaction rate 3 12 9% 4 19 15% 5 37 29%
Audio, Daniel Rucerito - (specific) subject knowledge 3 5 4% 4 7 5% 5 28 22% Audio, Daniel Rucerito - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 4 8 6% 5 27 21% Audio, Daniel Rucerito - lecture preparation 3 5 4% 4 10 8% 5 23 18% Audio, Daniel Rucerito - lecture presentation (organization, interesting, etc) 3 9 7% 4 10 8% 5 20 16%
Audio, Daniel Rucerito - punctuality 3 4 3% 4 12 9% 5 24 19% Audio, Daniel Rucerito - Overall satisfaction rate 3 4 3% 4 13 10% 5 22 17% Audio, Giri - (specific) subject knowledge 3 2 2% 4 3 2% 5 56 44% Audio, Giri - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 4 20 16% 5 38 30%
Audio, Giri - lecture preparation 4 15 12% 5 43 34% Audio, Giri - lecture presentation (organization, interesting, etc) 3 6 5% 4 16 13% 5 39 30% Audio, Giri - punctuality 3 4 3% 4 15 12% 5 42 33% Audio, Giri - Overall satisfaction rate 3 2 2% 4 20 16% 5 39 30%
Audio, Gerard Williams - (specific) subject knowledge 3 9 7% 4 27 21% 5 23 18% Audio, Gerard Williams - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 2 2 2% 3 12 9% 4 26 20% 5 18 14% Audio, Gerard Williams - lecture preparation 3 16 13% 4 18 14% 5 24 19% Audio, Gerard Williams - lecture presentation (organization, interesting, etc) 3 13 10% 4 26 20% 5 20 16%
Audio, Gerard Williams - punctuality 3 11 9% 4 21 16% 5 27 21% Audio, Gerard Williams - Overall satisfaction rate 2 2 2% 3 9 7% 4 29 23% 5 19 15% Audio, Poh Li Ting - (specific) subject knowledge 2 2 2% 3 11 9% 4 14 11% 5 17 13% Audio, Poh Li Ting - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 2 2 2% 3 6 5% 4 19 15% 5 17 13%
Audio, Poh Li Ting - lecture preparation 2 2 2% 3 10 8% 4 14 11% 5 18 14% Audio, Poh Li Ting - lecture presentation (organization, interesting, etc) 2 4 3% 3 11 9% 4 13 10% 5 16 13% Audio, Poh Li Ting - punctuality 3 9 7% 4 10 8% 5 24 19% Audio, Poh Li Ting - Overall satisfaction rate 2 2 2% 3 9 7% 4 18 14% 5 15 12%
Film, Games, Animation, Foo Chee Yong - (specific) subject knowledge 3 4 3% 4 11 9% 5 27 21% Film, Games, Animation, Foo Chee Yong - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 4 3% 4 13 10% 5 25 20% Film, Games, Animation, Foo Chee Yong - lecture preparation 3 7 5% 4 12 9% 5 22 17% Film, Games, Animation, Foo Chee Yong - lecture presentation (organization, interesting, etc) 3 10 8% 4 9 7% 5 22 17%
Film, Games, Animation, Foo Chee Yong - punctuality 3 5 4% 4 12 9% 5 25 20% Film, Games, Animation, Foo Chee Yong - Overall satisfaction rate 4 16 13% 5 21 16% Games, Chris Chu - (specific) subject knowledge 4 2 2% 5 9 7% Games, Chris Chu - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 4 3% 4 0 0% 5 10 8%
Games, Chris Chu - lecture preparation 4 1 1% 5 10 8% Games, Chris Chu - lecture presentation (organization, interesting, etc) 3 4 3% 4 1 1% 5 9 7% Games, Chris Chu - punctuality 4 1 1% 5 10 8% Games, Chris Chu - Overall satisfaction rate 4 2 2% 5 9 7%
Games, Degree, Carlos Bott - (specific) subject knowledge 3 4 3% 4 1 1% 5 9 7% Games, Degree, Carlos Bott - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 5 4% 4 0 0% 5 9 7% Games, Degree, Carlos Bott - lecture preparation 3 4 3% 4 3 2% 5 7 5% Games, Degree, Carlos Bott - lecture presentation (organization, interesting, etc) 3 5 4% 4 2 2% 5 7 5%
Games, Degree, Carlos Bott - punctuality 3 5 4% 4 0 0% 5 9 7% Games, Degree, Carlos Bott - Overall satisfaction rate 3 4 3% 4 2 2% 5 8 6% Animation, Rizky Budiyanto - (specific) subject knowledge 3 4 3% 4 24 19% 5 23 18% Animation, Rizky Budiyanto - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 4 5 4% 5 43 34%
Animation, Rizky Budiyanto - lecture preparation 3 4 3% 4 8 6% 5 39 30% Animation, Rizky Budiyanto - lecture presentation (organization, interesting, etc) 3 5 4% 4 27 21% 5 19 15% Animation, Rizky Budiyanto - punctuality 3 5 4% 4 25 20% 5 21 16% Animation, Rizky Budiyanto - Overall satisfaction rate 3 2 2% 4 24 19% 5 25 20%
Animation, Ian Ang - (specific) subject knowledge 4 2 2% 5 5 4% Animation, Ian Ang - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 4 2 2% 5 5 4% Animation, Ian Ang - lecture preparation 4 2 2% 5 5 4% Animation, Ian Ang - lecture presentation (organization, interesting, etc) 4 2 2% 5 5 4%
Animation, Ian Ang - punctuality 4 2 2% 5 5 4% Animation, Ian Ang - Overall satisfaction rate 3 2 2% 4 2 2% 5 5 4% Degree, Hardie Tucker - (specific) subject knowledge 4 2 2% 5 36 28% Degree, Hardie Tucker - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 5 4% 4 22 17% 5 13 10%
Degree, Hardie Tucker - lecture preparation 4 6 5% 5 32 25% Degree, Hardie Tucker - lecture presentation (organization, interesting, etc) 4 21 16% 5 17 13% Degree, Hardie Tucker - punctuality 4 2 2% 5 36 28% Degree, Hardie Tucker - Overall satisfaction rate 4 24 19% 5 15 12%
Management, Dennis - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 5 4% 4 30 23% 5 46 36% Management, Dennis - service quality 3 7 5% 4 21 16% 5 56 44% Management, Dennis - always tries to find a solution 2 2 2% 3 7 5% 4 16 13% 5 59 46% Management, Dennis - Overall satisfaction rate 1 2 2% 3 7 5% 4 22 17% 5 55 43%
Management, Giri - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 4 32 25% 5 60 47% Management, Giri - service quality 4 31 24% 5 61 48% Management, Giri - always tries to find a solution 3 4 3% 4 28 22% 5 63 49% Management, Giri - Overall satisfaction rate 3 2 2% 4 34 27% 5 59 46%
Admin, Tiffany Ong - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 2 2 2% 3 10 8% 4 17 13% 5 19 15% Admin, Tiffany Ong - service quality 3 10 8% 4 14 11% 5 24 19% Admin, Tiffany Ong - always tries to find a solution 3 10 8% 4 13 10% 5 23 18% Admin, Tiffany Ong - Overall satisfaction rate 2 2 2% 3 9 7% 4 14 11% 5 23 18%
Admin, Isabella Rosalind - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 8 6% 4 16 13% 5 89 70% Admin, Isabella Rosalind - service qualtiy 3 11 9% 4 21 16% 5 82 64% Admin, Isabella Rosalind - always tries to find a solution 1 2 2% 3 13 10% 4 17 13% 5 80 63% Admin, Isabella Rosalind - Overall satisfaction rate 3 8 6% 4 24 19% 5 80 63%
Admin, Elliyana - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 4 21 16% 5 83 65% Admin, Elliyana - service quality 3 11 9% 4 15 12% 5 81 63% Admin, Elliyana - always tries to find a solution 2 3 2% 3 8 6% 4 16 13% 5 81 63% Admin, Elliyana - Overall satisfaction rate 3 10 8% 4 15 12% 5 82 64%
Marketing, Daniel Rucerito - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 6 5% 4 9 7% 5 24 19% Marketing, Daniel Rucerito - service quality 3 7 5% 4 9 7% 5 21 16% Marketing, Daniel Rucerito - always tries to find a solution 3 6 5% 4 11 9% 5 20 16% Marketing, Daniel Rucerito - Overall satisfaction rate 3 6 5% 4 10 8% 5 21 16%
TSO, Dennis Wong - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 8 6% 4 27 21% 5 37 29% TSO, Dennis Wong - service quality 3 8 6% 4 28 22% 5 37 29% TSO, Dennis Wong - always tries to find a solution 2 2 2% 3 7 5% 4 27 21% 5 37 29% TSO, Dennis Wong - Overall satisfaction rate 3 8 6% 4 27 21% 5 37 29%
TSO - Kershaw Tan - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 5 4% 4 30 23% 5 43 34% TSO - Kershaw Tan - service quality 2 2 2% 4 31 24% 5 42 33% TSO - Kershaw Tan - always tries to find a solution 2 3 2% 3 4 3% 4 29 23% 5 42 33% TSO - Kershaw Tan - Overall satisfaction rate 3 5 4% 4 30 23% 5 42 33%
TSO - Howard Lee - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 6 5% 4 29 23% 5 33 26% TSO - Howard Lee - service quality 2 2 2% 3 6 5% 4 27 21% 5 34 27% TSO - Howard Lee - always tries to find a solution 3 7 5% 4 29 23% 5 32 25% TSO - Howard Lee - Overall satisfaction rate 3 5 4% 4 29 23% 5 34 27%
TSO - Serge Kan - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 8 6% 4 19 15% 5 37 29% TSO - Serge Kan - service quality 3 8 6% 4 21 16% 5 34 27% TSO - Serge Kan - always tries to find a solution 3 9 7% 4 19 15% 5 35 27% TSO - Serge Kan - Overall satisfaction rate 3 10 8% 4 18 14% 5 36 28%
TSO - Mei Yin - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 3 4 3% 4 25 20% 5 43 34% TSO - Mei Yin - service quality 4 26 20% 5 43 34% TSO - Mei Yin - always tries to find a solution 3 4 3% 4 28 22% 5 40 31% TSO - Mei Yin - Overall satisfaction rate 4 30 23% 5 39 30%
TSO - Yewjin - friendliness/approachability/helpfulnes 1 2 2% 3 4 3% 4 10 8% 5 75 59% TSO - Yewjin - service quality 3 6 5% 4 11 9% 5 73 57% TSO - Yewjin - always tries to find a solution 3 4 3% 4 11 9% 5 75 59% TSO - Yewjin - Overall satisfaction rate 3 4 3% 4 13 10% 5 72 56%
Number of daily responses