Introduction to syntax 1
Introduction to syntax 2
Course time: Tuesday/Friday 11:00 AM-12:50 PM Location: JSB 221 instructor: office: office hours: David Pesetsky (pesetsk@mit.edu) to be announced to be announced TAs: Danfeng Wu (dfwu@mit.edu) Sahar Taghipour (sta262@g.uky.edu) office hours: to be announced 3
Tentative plan 4
Basic phrase structure Constituents Sentence fragments, movement, ellipsis, anaphora as tests for constituency, ambiguities built by the rule "Merge" Subcategorization and the notion "head" The sisterhood condition on subcategorization, and some consequences. Implications for acquisition. Modification of the sisterhood condition gives the notion "head". Structural definition of grammatical relations: subject, object θ-roles Agent, patient, goal... the Uniformity of Theta Assignment Hypothesis (UTAH) 5
Universal Grammar and language variation Movement as Internal Merge Case Theory the Cinque hierarchy head-final vs. head-initial languages mixed languages: FOFC scrambling in Japanese wh-movement in English verb-second (V2) in Germanic V2 on four continents V-to-T in French Verb-initiality in Irish morphological case systems Case and the licensing of nominal complements 6
A-movement A-bar movement Exceptional Case Marking Passive: movement motivated by Case VP-internal subjects Unaccusativity and Raising (vs. Control) wh-movement and pied-piping: probes and goals Successive-cyclicity and island phenomena 7
8
Lexicon 1. the 2. girl 3. will 4. read 5.book part of speech Determiner Noun Tense Verb Noun meaning take Ladusaw's course who is a girl future whatever "read" means which is a book sound [ðə] [gɹ l] [wɪl] [ri:d] [bʊk] 9
Lexicon 10
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE The quick brown fox will jump over the lazy dog. dog? credit: Radford, Andrew. 1988. Transformational Grammar: A First Course. CUP, Cambridge. 11
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE The quick brown fox will jump over the lazy dog. lazy dog? 12
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE The quick brown fox will jump over the lazy dog. the lazy dog? 13
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE The quick brown fox will jump over the lazy dog. over the lazy dog? 14
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE The quick brown fox will jump over the lazy dog. jump over the lazy dog? 15
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE The quick brown fox will jump over the lazy dog. will jump over the lazy dog? 16
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE The quick brown fox will jump over the lazy dog. *fox will jump over the lazy dog? 17
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE The quick brown fox will jump over the lazy dog. fox? 18
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE The quick brown fox will jump over the lazy dog. brown fox? 19
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE The quick brown fox will jump over the lazy dog. quick brown fox? 20
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE The quick brown fox will jump over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox? 21
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE The quick brown fox will jump over the lazy dog. *jump over the? 22
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE 23
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE 24
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: Terminology node immediately dominates dominates mother daughter sister root node terminal node 25
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: produced by Merge 26
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: produced by Merge lazy merges with dog 27
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: produced by Merge Merge Form a set (called a phrase or constituent) whose members are two elements α and β, either or both of which may be: a. words from the lexicon, or b. a set previously formed by Merge 28
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: produced by Merge the merges with lazy dog 29
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: produced by Merge over merges with the lazy dog 30
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: produced by Merge jump merges with over the lazy dog 31
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: produced by Merge will merges with jump over the lazy dog 32
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: produced by Merge Meanwhile, in a galaxy far, far away... brown merges with fox 33
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: produced by Merge quick merges with brown fox 34
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: produced by Merge the merges with quick brown fox 35
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: produced by Merge and then... the quick brown fox merges with will jump over the lazy dog 36
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: labeling the nodes The sister of a preposition must contain a noun (even if a determiner and various articles linearly intervene) The quick brown fox will jump... a.... over the lazy dog. b.... over the dog. c.... over lazy dogs. d.... over dogs. e.... over the ridiculous lazy dog. f.... *over the. g.... *over the lazy. h.... *over of. 37
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: labeling the nodes Noun Phrases (NP) 38
SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE: labeling the nodes The nodes for which N is the head are labeled N' or NP. They are "projections" of N. (Sophisticates: don't ask me about DP.) 39
Heads and complements eat vs. devour ask vs. inquire throw vs. put give vs. hand vs. write 40
(1) a. Mary has eaten. b. Mary has eaten the pizza. Heads and complements c. *Mary has devoured. d. Mary has devoured the pizza. (2) a. Bill will ask the time. b. *Bill will inquire the time. c. Bill will ask about the time. d. Bill will inquire about the time. 41
Heads and complements (3) a. [?]Sue will throw. b. Sue will throw the ball. c. Sue will throw the ball to Tom. d. [?]Sue will throw to Tom. [a & d ok in sports context] e. *Sue will put. f. *Sue will put the book. g. Sue will put the book under the desk. h. *Sue will put under the desk. 42
The facts: Heads and complements eat: optional NP sister devour: obligatory NP sister inquire: ask: throw: put: *NP sister ok (?) NP sister optional NP and optional PP sisters obligatory NP PP sisters 43
Heads and complements Subcategorization information in lexical entries: eat: devour: ask: inquire: throw: put: [+ (NP)] [+ NP] [+ NP] (not like ask) [+ NP (PP)] [+ NP PP] 44
Heads and complements It's not just verbs that have subcategorization properties: (1) adjectives a. *Mary is fond. b. Mary is fond of her friends. c. Mary is proud. d. Mary is proud of her friends. (2) prepositions a. *Mary went into. b. Mary went into the room. c. Mary went in. d. Mary went in the room. 45
Heads and complements Chomsky's generalization The lexical entry for a word contains subcategorization information only about its sister. 46
Heads and complements What's interesting about Chomsky's generalization? Significance for language acquisition: 1.Assume the generalization is just the way language works part of Universal Grammar. 2.This means that a child who is acquiring language does not have to pay attention to the entire phrase structure tree when learning the subcategorization requirements of a word. Makes the task easier. 47
Heads and complements What's wrong with the generalization? A verb may subcategorize for the P of a complement PP: English Russian depend on zaviset' ot lit. 'depend from' speak to govorit' s lit. 'speak with' look at smotret' na lit. 'watch on' look for iskat' knigu lit. 'seek' 48
Heads and complements Modification of Chomsky's generalization: The revised subcategorization generalization The lexical entry for a word contains subcategorization information about the head of its sister. We can now use the revised generalization to probe for the heads of phrases: 49
Heads and complements V subcategorizes for the complementizer of its complement when that complement is a clause (that vs. for): (1) a. Mary will believe [that the brown fox has depended on the lazy dog]. b. Mary will arrange [for the brown fox to depend on the lazy dog]. (2) a. *Mary will believe [for the brown fox to depend on the lazy dog]. b. *Mary will arrange [that the brown fox has depended on the lazy book]. 50
Heads and complements 51
Heads and complements 52
Heads and complements NOTE: FROM THIS POINT ON, WE DIDN'T GET TO THESE SLIDES, BUT THEY ARE WHAT'S COMING NEXT, AND USEFUL FOR THE ASSIGNMENT. SEE THE SUMMARY (last page) FOR A PROBABLY MORE USEFUL VERSION 53
Heads and complements C subcategorizes for the I of its sister (to vs. tensed verb): (3) a. *Mary will believe [that the brown fox to depend on the lazy dog]. b. Mary will arrange [for the brown fox to depend on the lazy dog]. c. Mary will believe [that the brown fox has depended on the lazy dog]. d. *Mary will arrange [for the brown fox has depended on the lazy dog]. 54
Heads and complements 55
Heads and complements 56
Heads and complements I subcategorizes for the V-morphology of its VP complement (1) a.... [for the quick brown fox to [depend on the lazy dog]. b. *...[for the quick brown fox to [depended on the lazy dog]. (2) a.... [that the quick brown fox will [depend on the lazy dog]. b. *... [that the quick brown fox will [depended on the lazy dog]. (3) a. *... [that the quick brown fox has depend on the lazy dog]. b.... [that the quick brown fox has depended on the lazy dog]. 57
Heads and complements 58
Heads and complements 59
Heads and complements 60