C R E A Performance Analysis for Colleges of Education Midwestern State University T E
Performance Analysis for Colleges of Education YEAR 10 Released November 2016 PACE is published yearly by the: Center for Research, Evaluation & Advancement of Teacher Education (CREATE) as part of the Institute for Educational Policy Research and Evaluation (IEPRE) at the University of Houston
CREATE ADVISORY COUNCIL Andrea Burridge Research and Data Analyst Houston Community College System Linda Mora Deputy Superintendent Curriculum & Instruction Northside Independent School District Charles Coble Partner The Third Mile Group, LLC Robert McPherson Dean, College of Education University of Houston Jeanne Gerlach Associate Provost for K -16 Initiatives The University of Texas at Arlington Nancy Pelz-Paget Director of Education & Society Program Aspen Institute John Miazga, Jr. Dean, College of Education Angelo State University Rosanne Stripling Professor of Education Leadership Texas A&M University Texarkana Johnny Veselka Executive Director Texas Association of School Administrators
CREATE MEMBER SYSTEMS AND INSTITUTIONS OPERATING PARTNERS TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Prairie View A&M University Tarleton State University Texas A&M International University Texas A&M University Texas A&M University-Central Texas Texas A&M University-Commerce Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Texas A&M University-Kingsville Texas A&M University-San Antonio Texas A&M University-Texarkana West Texas A&M University TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Lamar State College-Orange Lamar University Sam Houston State University Sul Ross State University Sul Ross State University-Rio Grande Texas State University UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM The University of Texas at Arlington The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas at Dallas The University of Texas at El Paso The University of Texas of the Permian Basin The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley The University of Texas at San Antonio The University of Texas at Tyler UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM University of Houston University of Houston-Clear Lake University of Houston-Downtown University of Houston-Victoria PROGRAM PARTNERS Abilene Christian University Angelo State University Austin College Baylor University East Texas Baptist University Hardin-Simmons University Houston Baptist University Howard Payne University McMurry University Our Lady of the Lake University Schreiner University Southern Methodist University Southwestern University St. Edward s University St. Mary s University Stephen F. Austin State University Texas Christian University Texas Lutheran University Texas Southern University Texas Tech University Texas Wesleyan University Texas Woman s University University of Mary Hardin-Baylor University of North Texas University of North Texas at Dallas University of St. Thomas University of the Incarnate Word Wayland Baptist University
D. Professional Impact Reports
SECTION D: Professional Impact Trend Reports Section D includes information about teacher and district hiring patterns, the placement of university completers within the PZPI, and retention rates for the 2012 cohort of first-year teachers. D.1.1-3: Teacher Hiring in the Proximal Zone of Professional Impact. These three reports show school district hiring patterns in the PZPI by comparing the supply of new teacher FTEs provided by a preparation program to the total FTEs employed by subject area and school level. The category Teachers Supplied is defined as the number of newly-hired teacher Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) in the PZPI who obtained probationary or standard certification from the preparation program in 2013-2014 with no prior teaching experience. The category District Hires is defined as the number of newly-hired teacher Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) employed in the PZPI in 2014-2015. A hiring ratio was calculated to represent the impact of university teacher production in the PZPI for that certification cohort. D.2: Percentage of Newly-Certified Teachers Employed Inside and Outside the Proximal Zone of Professional Impact. This analysis shows the percentage of the university s newly-certified teachers (those obtaining a standard certificate with no prior teaching experience) employed within a seventy-five mile radius of the university. D.3: District Hiring Patterns of University-Prepared Teachers in the Proximal Zone of Professional Impact. This report is the first page of a supplemental document comparing the 2015-2016 hiring patterns of districts in the university s PZPI (See Attachment 3 to view the full report). The first chart shows which PZPI districts employed teachers from the university in 2015-2016 who were newly-certified in 2014-2015. The second shows the same information for all teachers employed in the PZPI in 2015-2016 who were certified through the university between 1994-1995 and 2014-2015. D.4.1-3: Percentage of University Completers in the Proximal Zone of Professional Impact by Level. This set of analyses provides information about the percentage of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) certified through the university s preparation program since 1994-1995 who are employed at a campus within the PZPI disaggregated by level. To provide context about the campus, the percent of school students classified as economically disadvantaged is provided. The column labeled # School FTEs shows the total number of teacher FTEs at the campus. The columns labeled # Univ FTEs and the % Univ FTEs show the total number and percent of FTEs employed at that campus who obtained certification from the target university s preparation program from 1994-1995 through 2014-2015. D.5: Comparison of Teacher Retention Trends. D.5: Five-Year Retention of First-Year Teachers. The table and corresponding graphic displays the five-year teacher retention and attrition rates for firstyear teachers certified in 2010-2011 who became employed in a Texas public school in 2011-2012. A first-year teacher is defined as an individual issued either a standard or probationary certificate in 2010-2011 who had no prior teaching experience. The retention rate for spring 2012 is always 100% in each analysis because the analysis starts with all cohort members employed in Texas public schools in 2011-2012. The target university s retention rates are compared with CREATE public and private universities, profit and nonprofit ACPs, and the state total. D.5.1-3: Five-Year Retention of First-Year Teachers by School Level. These reports further disaggregate the five-year retention rates and attrition rates of first-year teachers by high, middle, and elementary school level. 45
50 45 Teacher Hiring in the Proximal Zone of Professional Impact High Schools Newly Hired Teachers in PZPI in FY 2015 2016 100 51.6 40 35 31.7 Hiring Ratio 30 25 20 21.4 23.4 15 11.6 10 7 5 0 English Mathematics Science 0 0 Social Studies Foreign Language Fine Arts PE/Health 2 Computer Science 0 Voc/Bus Education Special Education 0 Other Total FTEs Subject Area Subject Area English Mathematics Science Social Foreign Fine Arts PE / Health Computer Voc / Bus Special Bilingual / Other Total FTEs Studies Language Science Education Education ESL Assign Teachers Supplied 1 0.7 2.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 6.2 District Hires2 10.0 6.3 2.8 7.5 5.9 4.7 5.1 0.1 5.0 3.1 0.0 3.0 53.6 Hiring Ratio3 7.0% 31.7% 21.4% 0.0% 0.0% 23.4% 2.0% 100.0% 0.0% 51.6% 0.0% 0.0% 11.6% 1 Includes number of newly hired FTEs from university preparation programs who obtained standard or probationary certification in FY 2015 with no prior teaching experience. 2 The number of newly hired teacher FTEs in the PZPI in AY 2015 2016. 3 Newly hired university FTEs divided by number of newly hired district FTEs in the PZPI. D.1.1 Page 46 Teacher Assignment and Certification Files, TEA
Teacher Hiring in the Proximal Zone of Professional Impact Middle Schools Newly Hired Teachers in PZPI in FY 2015 2016 50 61.3 45 40 35 31.7 Hiring Ratio 30 25 20 22.3 25 24.4 15 10 5 4.8 6.1 3.3 5 0 English Mathematics Science Social Studies Fine Arts PE/Health Computer Science Special Education Other Total FTEs 0 Subject Area Subject Area Self English Mathematics Studies Language Health Science Education Education ESL Science Social Foreign Fine Arts PE / Computer Voc / Bus Special Bilingual / Other Total FTEs Contained Assign Teachers Supplied1 0.0 2.3 3.8 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 8.9 District Hires2 0.0 10.3 6.2 3.2 4.2 0.0 3.3 4.1 0.2 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 36.5 Hiring Ratio3 0.0% 22.3% 61.3% 25.0% 4.8% 0.0% 6.1% 31.7% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% 5.0% 24.4% 1 Includes number of newly hired FTEs from university preparation programs who obtained standard or probationary certification in FY 2015 with no prior teaching experience. 2 The number of newly hired teacher FTEs in the PZPI in AY 2015 2016. 3 Newly hired university FTEs divided by number of newly hired district FTEs in the PZPI. D.1.2 Page 47 Teacher Assignment and Certification Files, TEA
Teacher Hiring in the Proximal Zone of Professional Impact Elementary Schools Newly Hired Teachers in PZPI in FY 2015 2016 50 45 40 Hiring Ratio 35 30 25 20 32.9 24.3 34.5 30.5 15 10 5 0 Core Subjects Non Core Subjects Special Education Bilingual/ESL Total 0 Subject Area Subject Area Teachers Supplied 1 District Hires 2 4 Core subjects are subjects that are STAAR tested. 5 Non core subjects are all subjects not STAAR tested. Core Subjects 19.5 59.2 Non Core Subjects 4 5 Special Education Bilingual/ ESL Total % FTEs 4.4 2.9 0.0 26.7 18.1 8.4 1.8 87.5 Hiring Ratio3 32.9% 24.3% 34.5% 0.0% 30.5% 1 Includes number of newly hired FTEs from university preparation programs who obtained standard or probationary certification in FY 2015 with no prior teaching experience. 2 The number of newly hired teacher FTEs in the PZPI in AY 2015 2016. 3 Newly hired university FTEs divided by number of newly hired district FTEs in the PZPI. D.1.3 Page 48 Teacher Assignment and Certification Files, TEA
Percentage of Newly Certified Teachers Employed Inside and Outside the Proximal Zone of Professional Impact 2014 2016 100 Percent of New Teachers Employed 80 60 40 20 43.9 56.1 39.4 60.6 33.8 66.2 0 2014 2015 2016 Spring of Academic Year Not in the Zone In the Zone New Teachers Employed 2014 2015 2016 % Change Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 2014 to 2016 In the Zone 46 56.1 43 60.6 45 66.2 10.1 Not in the Zone 36 43.9 28 39.4 23 33.8 10.1 Total 82 100.0 71 100.0 68 100.0 0.0 D.2 Page 49 Teacher Assignment and Certification Files TEA
District Hiring Patterns of University Prepared Teachers in PZPI 2015 2016 SAMPLE DOCUMENT: To view the Full Hiring Patterns Report Refer to Attachment 3 Teachers Newly Certified 1 in FY 2014 2015 Employing District University-Prepared Employed by District in 2015-2016 New Teachers Employed by District in 2015-2016 % University Newly- Certified Compared to New Teachers Employed BELLEVUE ISD 1 1 100.0 ARCHER CITY ISD 1 2 50.0 CROWELL ISD 1 2 50.0 PETROLIA ISD 1 2 50.0 IOWA PARK CISD 2 5 40.0 JACKSBORO ISD 2 5 40.0 BOWIE ISD 2 7 28.6 BRIDGEPORT ISD 2 7 28.6 VERNON ISD 4 15 26.7 WICHITA FALLS ISD 22 84 26.2 CITY VIEW ISD 1 4 25.0 BURKBURNETT ISD 2 9 22.2 OLNEY ISD 1 9 11.1 ALVORD ISD 0 2 0.0 BRYSON ISD 0 1 0.0 Employing District University-Prepared (1994-1995-2014-2015) Employed by District in 2015-2016 All Teachers Certified Total Teachers Employed by District in 2015-2016 Percent of Univ-Prepared Teachers in District PETROLIA ISD 22 40 55.0 IOWA PARK CISD 53 104 51.0 WICHITA FALLS ISD 429 864 49.7 HENRIETTA ISD 28 57 49.1 CITY VIEW ISD 36 76 47.4 ARCHER CITY ISD 15 32 46.9 ELECTRA ISD 16 35 45.7 BURKBURNETT ISD 96 222 43.2 HOLLIDAY ISD 23 57 40.4 WINDTHORST ISD 14 36 38.9 VERNON ISD 36 136 26.5 CHILLICOTHE ISD 5 19 26.3 BOWIE ISD 27 112 24.1 NOCONA ISD 17 72 23.6 SEYMOUR ISD 10 44 22.7 1. Includes standard certificates from all university pathways. D.3 Page 50 Teacher Certification and Employment Files TEA
Percentage of University Completers in High Schools in the Proximal Zone of Professional Impact 1 2014 2015 % School Econ # Campus # Univ % Univ District Name Campus Code Disadvantaged Campus Name FTEs 2 FTEs 3 FTEs4 PETROLIA ISD 39903001 39.6 PETROLIA JUNIOR HIGH/HIGH SCHOOL 22.2 12.0 54.1 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905004 72.9 WICHITA FALLS H S 91.6 33.3 36.4 ELECTRA ISD 243902001 60.6 ELECTRA JUNIOR/SENIOR HIGH 22.1 7.5 33.9 BURKBURNETT ISD 243901002 50.0 GATEWAY STUDENT SUPPORT CTR 6.0 2.0 33.3 BURKBURNETT ISD 243901001 39.9 BURKBURNETT H S 63.1 18.9 30.0 CITY VIEW ISD 243906001 50.6 CITY VIEW JUNIOR/SENIOR HIGH 40.1 11.5 28.7 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905002 42.9 RIDER H S 105.5 28.5 27.0 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905001 74.7 HIRSCHI H S 58.1 15.5 26.7 WINDTHORST ISD 5904001 32.4 WINDTHORST H S 13.8 3.6 26.1 HENRIETTA ISD 39902001 31.2 HENRIETTA H S 27.0 6.9 25.6 ARCHER CITY ISD 5901001 27.0 ARCHER CITY H S 27.4 6.8 24.8 VERNON ISD 244903001 41.4 VERNON H S 42.4 9.9 23.3 IOWA PARK CISD 243903001 35.8 IOWA PARK H S 45.7 9.1 19.9 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905006 71.1 HARRELL ACCELERATED LEARNING CENTE 10.4 2.0 19.2 HOLLIDAY ISD 5902001 17.9 HOLLIDAY H S 24.9 4.1 16.5 JACKSBORO ISD 119902001 40.9 JACKSBORO H S 33.2 5.0 15.1 BOWIE ISD 169901001 37.4 BOWIE H S 37.7 5.3 14.1 SEYMOUR ISD 12901001 44.1 SEYMOUR H S 18.7 2.4 12.8 MUNDAY CISD 138903001 67.3 MUNDAY SECONDARY 18.9 1.8 9.5 ALVORD ISD 249901001 22.0 ALVORD H S 21.7 2.0 9.2 GRAHAM ISD 252901001 42.9 GRAHAM H S 51.4 4.0 7.8 SAINT JO ISD 169911001 36.4 SAINT JO H S 14.4 1.0 6.9 PERRIN WHITT CISD 119903001 40.1 PERRIN H S 16.2 1.0 6.2 OLNEY ISD 252903001 42.9 OLNEY H S 23.0 1.1 4.8 NOCONA ISD 169902001 44.0 NOCONA H S 24.4 0.9 3.7 BRIDGEPORT ISD 249903001 44.1 BRIDGEPORT H S 49.6 1.0 2.0 DECATUR ISD 249905001 31.9 DECATUR H S 60.0 1.0 1.7 1 Listing includes both charter and public schools. Only the first 25 campuses are listed. 2 Number of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) employed by the campus. 3 Number of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) employed by the campus from the university. 4 Percent of University FTEs employed by the campus. D.4.1 Page 51 TAPR, Teacher Assignment file
Percentage of University Completers in Middle Schools in the Proximal Zone of Professional Impact 2014 2015 % School Econ # Campus # Univ % Univ District Name Campus Code Disadvantaged Campus Name FTEs 2 FTEs 3 FTEs4 IOWA PARK CISD 243903041 43.2 W F GEORGE MIDDLE 29.4 14.0 47.6 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905046 62.6 BARWISE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY 49.4 21.3 43.1 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905048 83.0 KIRBY MIDDLE 42.0 18.0 42.9 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905047 51.6 MCNIEL J H 45.8 18.9 41.3 HENRIETTA ISD 39902041 36.5 HENRIETTA MIDDLE 16.8 6.2 36.9 BURKBURNETT ISD 243901041 48.7 BURKBURNETT MIDDLE 61.5 22.2 36.1 HOLLIDAY ISD 5902041 21.7 HOLLIDAY MIDDLE 14.5 4.9 33.8 SEYMOUR ISD 12901042 47.3 SEYMOUR MIDDLE 15.0 3.3 22.0 WINDTHORST ISD 5904041 35.9 WINDTHORST JH 8.0 1.6 20.0 OLNEY ISD 252903041 65.3 OLNEY J H 14.5 2.7 18.6 VERNON ISD 244903041 63.2 VERNON MIDDLE SCHOOL 35.6 5.1 14.3 BOWIE ISD 169901041 46.4 BOWIE J H 28.1 3.7 13.2 NOCONA ISD 169902041 47.5 NOCONA MIDDLE 16.5 2.0 12.1 POOLVILLE ISD 184901041 57.0 POOLVILLE J H 10.0 1.0 10.0 JACKSBORO ISD 119902041 44.1 JACKSBORO MIDDLE 21.5 2.0 9.3 GRAHAM ISD 252901041 49.9 GRAHAM J H 44.9 4.0 8.9 BRIDGEPORT ISD 249903041 53.3 BRIDGEPORT MIDDLE 39.0 1.0 2.6 DECATUR ISD 249905041 46.4 MCCARROLL MIDDLE 37.8 1.0 2.6 1 1 Listing includes both charter and public schools. Only the first 25 campuses are listed. 2 Number of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) employed by the campus. 3 Number of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) employed by the campus from the university. 4 Percent of University FTEs employed by the campus. D.4.2 Page 52 TAPR, Teacher Assignment file
Percentage of University Completers in Elementary Schools in the Proximal Zone of Professional Impact 1 2014 2015 % School Econ # Campus # Univ % Univ District Name Campus Code Disadvantaged Campus Name FTEs 2 FTEs 3 FTEs4 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905207 100.0 NORTHWEST HEAD START 2.9 2.4 82.8 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905208 99.0 ROSEWOOD HEAD START 6.7 5.2 77.6 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905119 95.7 LAMAR EL 27.9 20.8 74.6 IOWA PARK CISD 243903103 50.2 KIDWELL EL 28.5 16.9 59.3 CITY VIEW ISD 243906101 68.5 CITY VIEW EL 36.6 21.5 58.7 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905130 98.0 FARRIS EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR 13.7 8.0 58.4 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905131 94.0 ZUNDELOWITZ EL 45.5 25.5 56.0 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905105 95.6 BURGESS EL 36.5 20.0 54.8 PETROLIA ISD 39903101 57.2 PETROLIA EL 19.8 10.8 54.5 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905125 97.4 WASHINGTON JACKSON EL MAGNET 27.8 15.0 54.0 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905109 62.2 FAIN EL 33.0 17.7 53.6 WINDTHORST ISD 5904101 35.7 WINDTHORST EL 14.0 7.1 50.7 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905129 80.7 SOUTHERN HILLS EL 41.5 20.8 50.1 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905128 97.4 SCOTLAND PARK EL 40.1 19.2 47.9 IOWA PARK CISD 243903101 41.7 BRADFORD EL 25.5 12.1 47.5 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905121 67.9 MILAM EL 37.2 17.6 47.3 BURKBURNETT ISD 243901101 66.5 JOHN G HARDIN EL 33.4 15.6 46.7 NOCONA ISD 169902101 65.1 NOCONA EL 30.6 13.5 44.1 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905108 64.6 CUNNINGHAM SCHOOL 33.9 14.8 43.7 HENRIETTA ISD 39902101 52.5 HENRIETTA EL 34.0 14.9 43.8 BURKBURNETT ISD 243901103 42.1 JOHN G TOWER EL 38.4 16.7 43.5 CHILLICOTHE ISD 99902101 85.7 CHILLICOTHE EL 9.3 3.9 41.9 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905126 35.0 WEST FOUNDATION EL 34.6 14.3 41.3 BURKBURNETT ISD 243901104 49.7 I C EVANS EL 41.7 16.8 40.3 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905111 45.9 FOWLER EL 38.1 15.3 40.2 WICHITA FALLS ISD 243905123 15.0 SHEPPARD AFB EL 19.1 7.6 39.8 ARCHER CITY ISD 5901101 46.6 ARCHER CITY EL 22.6 9.0 39.8 1 Listing includes both charter and public schools. Only the first 25 campuses are listed. 2 Number of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) employed by the campus. 3 Number of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) employed by the campus from the university. 4 Percent of University FTEs employed by the campus. D.4.3 Page 53 TAPR, Teacher Assignment file
Comparison of Teacher Retention Trends Five Year Retention of First Year Teachers1,2 2012 2016 100 95 90 85 80 Percent Retained 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CREATE Private Universities CREATE Public Universities For Profit ACPs Non Profit ACPs State Total Entity/ Organization Number Teachers³ Percent Retained in Spring of Academic Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Attrition Rate 48 100.0 89.6 91.7 91.7 87.5 12.5 CREATE Public Universities 4321 100.0 93.9 89.3 84.9 79.4 20.6 CREATE Private Universities 453 100.0 95.4 89.0 81.9 76.4 23.6 For Profit ACPs 2892 100.0 89.5 81.0 73.9 68.3 31.7 Non-Profit ACPs 1888 100.0 88.7 76.0 69.4 63.3 36.7 State Total 10644 100.0 91.5 84.2 78.2 72.5 27.5 1 Includes teachers obtaining a standard or probationary certificate in 2010 2011 with no prior teaching experience. 2 Texas data only tracks public school employment. 3 Numbers less than 10 are not represented on this figure. D.5 Page 54 Teacher Certification and Assignment Files, AEIS, TEA
Comparison of Teacher Retention Trends Five Year Retention of First Year Teachers by School Level 2012 2016 High School 1,2 100 95 90 85 80 Percent Retained 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CREATE Private Universities CREATE Public Universities For Profit ACPs Non Profit ACPs State Total Entity/ Organization Number Teachers³ Percent Retained in Spring of Academic Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Attrition Rate 8 100.0 87.5 100.0 87.5 87.5 12.5 CREATE Public Universities 1008 100.0 92.5 85.3 79.5 74.9 25.1 CREATE Private Universities 117 100.0 93.2 82.1 74.4 72.6 27.4 For Profit ACPs 1085 100.0 87.5 78.7 71.6 65.6 34.4 Non-Profit ACPs 574 100.0 88.9 75.8 68.8 62.7 37.3 State Total 2989 100.0 89.7 80.8 74.1 68.7 31.3 1 Includes teachers obtaining a standard or probationary certificate in 2010 2011 with no prior teaching experience. 2 Texas data only tracks public school employment. 3 Numbers less than 10 are not represented on this figure. D.5.1 Page 55 Teacher Certification and Assignment Files, AEIS, TEA
Comparison of Teacher Retention Trends Five Year Retention of First Year Teachers by School Level 2012 2016 Middle School 1,2 100 95 90 85 80 Percent Retained 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CREATE Private Universities CREATE Public Universities For Profit ACPs Non Profit ACPs State Total Entity/ Organization Number Teachers³ Percent Retained in Spring of Academic Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Attrition Rate 10 100.0 90.0 90.0 90.0 90.0 10.0 CREATE Public Universities 873 100.0 94.5 89.8 86.1 80.9 19.1 CREATE Private Universities 86 100.0 96.5 93.0 83.7 74.4 25.6 For Profit ACPs 822 100.0 92.2 83.8 77.3 71.4 28.6 Non-Profit ACPs 436 100.0 89.7 76.6 68.3 62.2 37.8 State Total 2462 100.0 92.7 85.2 79.0 73.1 26.9 1 Includes teachers obtaining a standard or probationary certificate in 2010 2011 with no prior teaching experience. 2 Texas data only tracks public school employment. 3 Numbers less than 10 are not represented on this figure. D.5.2 Page 56 Teacher Certification and Assignment Files, AEIS, TEA
Comparison of Teacher Retention Trends Five Year Retention of First Year Teachers by School Level 2012 2016 Elementary School 1,2 100 95 90 85 80 Percent Retained 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CREATE Private Universities CREATE Public Universities For Profit ACPs Non Profit ACPs State Total Entity/ Organization Number Teachers³ Percent Retained in Spring of Academic Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Attrition Rate 29 100.0 89.7 89.7 93.1 86.2 13.8 CREATE Public Universities 2227 100.0 94.4 91.1 86.6 80.9 19.1 CREATE Private Universities 226 100.0 96.0 89.8 84.1 77.9 22.1 For Profit ACPs 796 100.0 89.9 82.4 75.1 70.4 29.6 Non-Profit ACPs 743 100.0 88.8 78.1 72.0 65.9 34.1 State Total 4565 100.0 92.5 86.7 81.2 75.7 24.3 1 Includes teachers obtaining a standard or probationary certificate in 2010 2011 with no prior teaching experience. 2 Texas data only tracks public school employment. 3 Numbers less than 10 are not represented on this figure. D.5.3 Page 57 Teacher Certification and Assignment Files, AEIS, TEA