REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES FOR JOINING THE BOLOGNA PROCESS

Similar documents
European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Conventions. Declarations. Communicates

NATIONAL REPORTS

The Bologna Process: actions taken and lessons learnt

Emma Kushtina ODL organisation system analysis. Szczecin University of Technology

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

Ten years after the Bologna: Not Bologna has failed, but Berlin and Munich!

The recognition, evaluation and accreditation of European Postgraduate Programmes.

Bologna Process in Ukraine: The Decade Anniversary Sofiya Nikolaeva

General report Student Participation in Higher Education Governance

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

BOLOGNA DECLARATION ACHIEVED LEVEL OF IMPLEMENTATION AND FUTURE ACTIVITY PLAN

EUA Quality Culture: Implementing Bologna Reforms

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

2 di 7 29/06/

What is the added value of a Qualifications Framework? The experience of Malta.

Setting the Scene: ECVET and ECTS the two transfer (and accumulation) systems for education and training

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

The European Higher Education Area in 2012:

Accreditation in Europe. Zürcher Fachhochschule

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

Interview on Quality Education

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

LEARNING AGREEMENT FOR STUDIES

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Recognition of Prior Learning

The development and implementation of a coaching model for project-based learning

3 of Policy. Linking your Erasmus+ Schools project to national and European Policy

Bachelor of International Hospitality Management, BA IHM. Course curriculum National and Institutional Part

Qualification Guidance

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

EUROMA critical factors for achieving high quality in Economics master programmes

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Analysis and recommendations on Design for All related higher education and research policies in EU member countries

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

ITEM: 6. MEETING: Trust Board 20 February 2008

EUA Annual Conference Bergen. University Autonomy in Europe NOVA University within the context of Portugal

5) Name of the HEI Freie University of Berlin

Final Report ; Slovenia

General syllabus for third-cycle courses and study programmes in

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Perioperative Care of Congenital Heart Diseases

References 1. Constitution No.2 /1989 on National Education System 2. Government Regulation No.60/1999 on Higher Education

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

PROJECT DESCRIPTION SLAM

Internship Department. Sigma + Internship. Supervisor Internship Guide

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

Orientation Workshop on Outcome Based Accreditation. May 21st, 2016

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

Accreditation of Prior Experiential and Certificated Learning (APECL) Guidance for Applicants/Students

Submission of a Doctoral Thesis as a Series of Publications

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

Self-certification of the NQFs of the Netherlands and Flanders Mark Frederiks

Assessment and national report of Poland on the existing training provisions of professionals in the Healthcare Waste Management industry REPORT: III

Name of the PhD Program: Urbanism. Academic degree granted/qualification: PhD in Urbanism. Program supervisors: Joseph Salukvadze - Professor

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

COLLEGE OF INTEGRATED CHINESE MEDICINE ADMISSIONS POLICY

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

The Referencing of the Irish National Framework of Qualifications to EQF

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Summary and policy recommendations

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications

No.1-32/2006-U.II/U.I(ii) Government of India Ministry of Human Resource Development Department of Higher Education

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

LOOKING FOR (RE)DEFINING UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014

American College of Emergency Physicians National Emergency Medicine Medical Student Award Nomination Form. Due Date: February 14, 2012

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

To the parents / guardians of students of the ISE Primary School

Defining and Comparing Generic Competences in Higher Education

Knowledge for the Future Developments in Higher Education and Research in the Netherlands

Parent Teacher Association Constitution

P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning

SOCRATES PROGRAMME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS

Curriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

Pharmaceutical Medicine

Master s Programme in European Studies

to Club Development Guide.

PhD Competences in Food Studies

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #8

Irtiqa a Programme: Guide for the inspection of schools in The Emirate of Abu Dhabi

GENERAL INFORMATION STUDIES DEGREE PROGRAMME PERIOD OF EXECUTION SCOPE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE OF STUDY CODE DEGREE

Qualification handbook

INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -

REGULATION RESPECTING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT AND SPECIALIST'S CERTIFICATES BY THE COLLÈGE DES MÉDECINS DU QUÉBEC

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying document to the

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Transcription:

towards the european higher education area bologna process BFUG B3 7 fin 6 July 2004 REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES FOR JOINING THE BOLOGNA PROCESS The criteria for admission of new members to the Bologna Process at the Ministerial Conference in Bergen have been set by the Berlin Communiqué: Countries party to the European Cultural Convention shall be eligible for membership of the European Higher Education Area provided that they at the same time declare their willingness to pursue and implement the objectives of the Bologna Process in their own systems of higher education. Their applications should contain information on how they will implement the principles and objectives of the declaration. Applicant countries have sought guidance on the procedures and requirements for membership of the Bologna Process. The purpose of this document is to meet this objective in a fair and transparent manner. It also consolidates both principles and action lines of the Bologna Process into a single document. 1. PRINCIPLES While the 10 actions lines are the main focus of members, it is equally important to note the underlying principles of the Bologna Process. The realisation of the European Higher Education Area can only be achieved by incorporating their philosophy within the higher education system of each country. These principles, which all come from the Bologna Declaration and/or from the Prague and Berlin Communiqués, are elaborated below: - International mobility of students and staff; - Autonomous universities; - Student participation in the governance of higher education; - Public responsibility for higher education; - The social dimension of the Bologna Process. Applicant States are requested to confirm their adherence to these principles in their applications. 1.1. International mobility of students and staff Promotion of mobility by overcoming obstacles to the effective exercise of free movement (Bologna declaration). Ministers reaffirmed that efforts to promote mobility must be continued to enable students, teachers, researchers and administrative staff to benefit from the richness of the European Higher Education Area including its democratic values, diversity of cultures and languages and the diversity of the higher education systems. (Prague Communiqué)

1.2. Autonomous universities European higher education institutions, for their part, have accepted the challenge and taken up a main role in constructing the European area of higher education, also in the wake of the fundamental principles laid down in the Bologna Magna Charta Universitatum of 1988. 1 This is of the highest importance, given that Universities' independence and autonomy ensure that higher education and research systems continuously adapt to changing needs, society's demands and advances in scientific knowledge. (Bologna Declaration) Ministers accept that institutions need to be empowered to take decisions on their internal organisation and administration. (Berlin Communiqué) 1.3. Student participation in the governance of higher education Ministers affirmed that students should participate in and influence the organisation and content of education at universities and other higher education institutions. (Prague Communiqué) Ministers note the constructive participation of student organisations in the Bologna Process and underline the necessity to include the students continuously and at an early stage in further activities. Students are full partners in higher education governance. Ministers note that national legal measures for ensuring student participation are largely in place throughout the European Higher Education Area. They also call on institutions and student organisations to identify ways of increasing actual student involvement in higher education governance. (Berlin Communiqué) 1.4. Higher education as a public responsibility They [the Ministers] supported the idea that higher education should be considered a public good and is and will remain a public responsibility (Prague Communiqué) 1.5. The social dimension of the Bologna Process Ministers reaffirm the importance of the social dimension of the Bologna Process. The need to increase competitiveness must be balanced with the objective of improving the social characteristics of the European Higher Education Area, aiming at strengthening social cohesion and reducing social and gender inequalities both at national and at European level. (Berlin Communiqué) 2. OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Bologna Process are summarised in its 10 action lines. In common with all members, applicants are equally obliged to reach the common goals by 2010 as defined in the Bologna Declaration supplemented by the Prague and Berlin Communiqués. Three intermediate goals for 2005 were defined in the Berlin Communiqué. 1 The university is an autonomous institution at the heart of societies differently organized because of geography and historical heritage; it produces, examines, appraises and hands down culture by research and teaching. 2

2.1. The Bologna Action Lines Six action lines were introduced in the Bologna Declaration: 1. Adoption of a system of easily readable and comparable degrees; 2. Adoption of a system essentially based on two cycles; 3. Establishment of a system of credits; 4. Promotion of mobility; 5. Promotion of European co-operation in quality assurance; 6. Promotion of the European dimension in higher education. Three more were introduced in the Prague Communiqué: 7. Lifelong learning; 8. Higher education institutions and students; 9. Promoting the attractiveness of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). A tenth action line was introduced in the Berlin Communiqué: 10. Doctoral studies and the synergy between the EHEA and the ERA (European Research Area). The various action lines of the Bologna Process are reflected in the BFUG Work Programme 2003-2005. The social dimension of the Bologna Process might be seen as an overarching or transversal action line. 3. REPORTS FROM POTENTIAL NEW MEMBERS All members of the Bologna Process will be asked to produce a national report before the Bergen Ministerial Conference. Potential members will be asked to produce a report in a similar format. In Berlin, Ministers defined three intermediate priorities: quality assurance, the two-cycle degree system and recognition of degrees and periods of studies. The achievement of these goals by the 40 members States will be the subject of a Stocktaking exercise, and while potential members will not be part of the stocktaking, they will be required to indicate the extent to which existing (or planned) reforms of their higher education systems meet the same goals. The specific targets are as follows: 3.1. Quality assurance The primary responsibility for quality assurance should lie with the institutions. The national quality assurance system should include: o A definition of the responsibilities of the bodies and institutions involved; o Evaluation of programmes or institutions, including internal assessment, external review, participation of students and the publication of results; o A system of accreditation, certification or comparable procedures. 3

3.2. Two-cycle degree system A national degree system for higher education based on two main cycles should have been introduced. Access to the second cycle shall require successful completion of first cycle studies lasting a minimum of three years. The degree awarded after the first cycle should also be relevant to the labour market. The second cycle should lead to the master s and/or doctoral degree. Members of the Bologna Process are committed to having started the implementation of the two-cycle system by 2005. 3.3. Recognition of degrees and periods of studies In terms of the adoption of a system of easily readable and comparable degrees, members are encouraged to ratify the Lisbon Recognition Convention. Allied to this, members are committed that every student graduating should receive the Diploma Supplement automatically and free of charge, in a widely spoken European language. 4. PROCEDURE FOR APPLICATION The decision to accept new members to the Bologna Process will be taken by the next Ministerial Conference (Bergen, 19 20 May 2005). The role of the BFUG is to make a recommendation, having satisfied itself of the credentials and commitment of the applicants. Potential members should send an application for membership to the Minister responsible for Higher Education in the Host Country of the next Ministerial Conference 2, with a copy to the BFUG Chair 3. The application, which should be signed by the (national) Minister responsible for higher education, should declare their commitment to pursue and implement the principles and objectives of the Bologna Process in their own systems of higher education. The application should be complemented by a report, detailing the current higher education policies of the country in the light of the Bologna Process and outlining what reforms they plan to undertake to meet the goals of the Process. The attached template identifies headlines and key questions which should be addressed in the context of this report. The report should be sent to the BFUG Chair and Secretariat 4, in English, before 31 December 2004. This is also the final deadline for applications. When an application is received, the BFUG Chair and Secretariat will verify that it satisfies the prescribed procedures. A confirmation of receipt will be sent to the applicant country. At the same time, the BFUG will be informed of the application. The applicant country will then be invited to seminars and other events in the Bologna Process. Further procedures regarding the processing and assessment of applications will be decided by the BFUG meeting on 12-13 October 2004. 2 Minister Kristin Clemet, Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research, Postboks 8119 Dep, NO-0032 Oslo 3 m.e.leegwater@minocw.nl 4 bologna@ufd.dep.no 4

Decisions regarding membership will be taken by the Ministerial Conference on 19-20 May 2005. SUMMARY Applications for membership of the Bologna Process should be signed by the Minister responsible for higher education. They should be addressed to the Norwegian Minister of Education, as host of the next Ministerial Conference, with a copy to the Dutch Minister of Education as Chair of the Bologna Process in the autumn of 2004. Applications should be accompanied by or followed by a national report in English elaborated in accordance with the guidelines in the appendix. The deadline for submitting applications as well as national reports is 31 December 2004. The Bologna Secretariat may be contacted for further information. All about the Bologna Process at: http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/ BFUGB3 7 Accessions final 5