Board of Regents Work Session

Similar documents
California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

GRAND CHALLENGES SCHOLARS PROGRAM

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

Michigan State University

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

Director, Ohio State Agricultural Technical Institute

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Program Change Proposal:

An Introduction to LEAP

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

Community Based Participatory Action Research Partnership Protocol

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Title Columbus State Community College's Master Planning Project (Phases III and IV) Status COMPLETED

For the Ohio Board of Regents Second Report on the Condition of Higher Education in Ohio

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND GOALS

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Online Master of Business Administration (MBA)

Libraries Embrace the Engineering Grand Challenges

Denver Public Schools

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

SEARCH PROSPECTUS: Dean of the College of Law

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

Public School Choice DRAFT

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Strategic Plan Revised November 2012 Reviewed and Updated July 2014

Beyond PDF. Using Wordpress to create dynamic, multimedia library publications. Library Technology Conference, 2016 Kate McCready Shane Nackerud

Progress or action taken

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

Division of Student Affairs Annual Report. Office of Multicultural Affairs

AGENDA Symposium on the Recruitment and Retention of Diverse Populations

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

EXPERIENCE UGA Outstanding Process Improvement: Increase Service to Students

South Dakota Board of Regents Intent to Plan for a Master of Engineering (M.Eng)

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Student Experience Strategy

SHARED LEADERSHIP. Building Student Success within a Strong School Community

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

STRATEGIC GROWTH FROM THE BASE OF THE PYRAMID

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Request for Proposal UNDERGRADUATE ARABIC FLAGSHIP PROGRAM

Educational Leadership and Administration

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

TRANSNATIONAL TEACHING TEAMS INDUCTION PROGRAM OUTLINE FOR COURSE / UNIT COORDINATORS

Engaging Faculty in Reform:

University of Michigan Dean, School of Information

UH STEM Pathways Project

The mission of the Grants Office is to secure external funding for college priorities via local, state, and federal funding sources.

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

What Is a Chief Diversity Officer? By. Dr. Damon A. Williams & Dr. Katrina C. Wade-Golden

Utfordringer for naturfagene, spesielt knyttet til progresjon. Doris Jorde Naturfagsenteret

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Characteristics of Collaborative Network Models. ed. by Line Gry Knudsen

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

SUPPORTING COMMUNITY COLLEGE DELIVERY OF APPRENTICESHIPS

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

AAC/BOT Page 1 of 9

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

University of Delaware Library STRATEGIC PLAN

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

Loyalist College Applied Degree Proposal. Name of Institution: Loyalist College of Applied Arts and Technology

Developing, Supporting, and Sustaining Future Ready Learning

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Mission Statement To achieve excellence in our Pharm.D. and graduate programs through innovative education and leading edge research.

Date: 9:00 am April 13, 2016, Attendance: Mignone, Pothering, Keller, LaVasseur, Hettinger, Hansen, Finnan, Cabot, Jones Guest: Roof

OHIO STATE S STRATEGIC PLAN TIME AND CHANGE. Enable, Empower and Inspire

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

Practical Learning Tools (Communication Tools for the Trainer)

Transcription:

Board of Regents Work Session June 2016 June 9, 2016 8:30 a.m. - 9:30 a.m. West Committee Room, McNamara Alumni Center

1. Driving Transformational Change Through Implementation of the UMTC Strategic Plan Docket Item Summary - Page 3 Presentation - Page 7 BOR - JUN 2016 - Work Session Page 2 of 19

BOARD OF REGENTS DOCKET ITEM SUMMARY Board of Regents Work Session June 9, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: Driving Transformational Change through Implementation of the UMTC Strategic Plan Review Review + Action Action X Discussion This is a report required by Board policy. PRESENTERS: President Eric W. Kaler Karen Hanson, Executive Vice President and Provost PURPOSE & KEY POINTS This work session will provide an opportunity for discussion of implementation priorities for the Strategic Plan (plan) for the Twin Cities campus. It will include a brief update on additional progress made during the second year of the 10-year plan, and will provide an opportunity for the Board to discuss priorities for 2016 17 that will shape campus work plans and drive progress on academic goals. Strategic Goals and Implementation Progress With a theme of Driving Tomorrow, the plan is faithful to the enduring mission of the University, and derives its recommendations from an understanding of the breadth and depth of the Twin Cities campus. The plan also focuses on the distinctive responsibilities that accompany the University s land-grant status. The plan articulates institutional goals and the long-term actions necessary to fulfill institutional responsibilities, sustain and enhance effectiveness, and advance the University s standing. Implementation of the plan must sustain progress on all four goals: 1. Supporting excellence and rejecting complacency. 2. Leveraging the breadth and quality of research and curricular strengths and capacity to address the grand challenges of a diverse and changing world. 3. Recruiting and retaining field-shaping researchers and teachers. 4. Fostering reciprocal engagement with surrounding communities and capitalizing on the specific location. The fundamental aim of the plan is to marshal resources and strengths more effectively, to encourage collaborations and to connect research and curricular strategies. These goals, along with operational excellence, will ensure that faculty and staff do their best work and that students are provided with innovative educational opportunities. Page 3 of 19

The plan s priorities have helped frame the compact and budget planning processes that shape the University s academic directions and strategic investment decisions. Colleges and administrative units have been engaged in aligning their priorities and programs with the campus goals, as well as with their unit s distinctive goals and responsibilities. Plan goals have been incorporated into the annual work plans of central administrative areas, including undergraduate education, graduate and professional education, student affairs, equity and diversity, and human resources. There are also ongoing alignments with Office of Information Technology, Office of the Vice President for Research, University of Minnesota Foundation, and other key units. Curricular and Research Initiatives Grand Challenges Curriculum UMTC placed special emphasis on jump-starting activity connected with curricular and research goals. A Grand Challenges Curriculum was launched in fall 2015 and continued this spring, with additional courses ready for launch in fall 2016. These team-taught courses engage students in the process of discovery that is central to the University s mission. They address issues of local and global relevance and integrate diverse expertise, methods, and perspectives. Topics range from fracking, to global hunger, to reconciliation and justice. The undergraduate-level Grand Challenge (GC) courses are constructed to fulfill one of the current liberal education theme requirements: civic life and ethics; diversity and social justice; environment; global perspectives; and technology and society. These curricular innovations, and the development of related minors and theme courses, will open new learning and career opportunities for students. A set of courses is planned to align more specifically with the GC priorities that have been identified for the campus. These new courses will provide a foundation for faculty consideration of how a GC curriculum might be more thoroughly integrated with a renewal of the campus liberal education requirements. That consideration must also be informed by a commitment to the statewide framework of the Minnesota Transfer Curriculum, which facilitates transfer for lower-division general education students across all public colleges and universities in Minnesota. Grand Challenges Research Strategic research priorities have been identified through a process that drew on the expertise of faculty and engaged the campus in discussions of new opportunities and the future. The campus identified five interrelated areas where the University can have greater impact on critical challenges of the state and world, through interdisciplinary collaboration: 1. Assuring clean water and sustainable ecosystems: Achieve adequate supplies of safe and clean water to sustain people, agriculture, and industry, while protecting water resources and ensuring the sustainability of environmental systems and the vitality of communities on rivers, lakes, and seas. 2. Advancing health through tailored solutions: Foster community and population health together with individual physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being by tailoring health care services and interventions to biological, social, and cultural circumstances. 3. Fostering just and equitable communities: Assure quality of life and equality of opportunity for all members of diverse communities including educational and health equity, economic opportunity, personal security, and cultural experience. 4. Enhancing individual and community capacity for a changing world: Foster physical, mental, and cognitive well-being from early childhood through late maturity, across the Page 4 of 19

course of life transitions, ensuring that individuals and communities thrive amid great social, technological, and ecological change. 5. Feeding the world sustainably: Produce, distribute, and maintain safe and sufficient food supplies through environmentally sustainable practices to ensure the vitality of growing and demographically diverse populations. Efforts to broaden and deepen collaborations in the selected areas will combine with ongoing efforts by colleges and departments to build productive collaborations across structural and disciplinary boundaries. More information can be found on the Strategic Plan website. This spring, proposals were submitted for the GC exploratory research grants, which aim to seed and foster projects with potential for exceptional strength and competitive advantage. Qualified projects will also align with key GC criteria: global impact and strong local relevance for Minnesota; existing faculty strength and leadership; disciplinary diversity; interconnection with education and external partners; and sustainability over ten years. In addition, five interdisciplinary research work groups have been established for the development of multiple high-potential collaborations in the five GC areas. Proposals from these groups are due in June and will be reviewed over the summer, with first investments announced by fall 2016. Research must also be coordinated with other University initiatives, such as MnDRIVE, and be synergistic with the system-wide strategic research goals of the Office of the Vice President for Research. As noted in the plan, the University will also continue to support and honor the specialized research and the deep disciplinary scholarship that are also central to its mission. Progress across the plan Progress on the curricular and research goals is synergistic with progress in other areas, which are receiving focused attention. This includes initiatives to strengthen recruitment and support for field-shaping researchers and teachers; work to strengthen reciprocal engagement that leverages the campus location; and steps to create an invigorated culture that embraces ambition, challenge, innovation, and diversity. Other pillars of the plan are also receiving focused attention. Important campus-wide efforts include, initiatives to strengthen faculty and staff leadership development and support, to increase the diversity of faculty candidate pools, to strengthen the strategic framework for academic technology in teaching and learning, to recognize and appropriately value interdisciplinary and community-engaged scholarship in faculty promotion and review, to strengthen operational excellence, and to enhance public engagement. Driving Continued Progress As a framework for academic transformation, the plan will continue to be implemented dynamically through initiatives and collaborations involving the campus community. Engagement of campus and external stakeholders will continue, to make progress on plan goals and refine the roadmap for the future. There will be a focus on synergies between the campus plan and the partnerships with the Foundation and the Alumni Association. The Twin Cities plan must also be connected in distinctive and dynamic ways with the strategic plans of the other campuses. The plan is a means of advancing institutional excellence and impact; measuring its success will include alignment with metrics and benchmarks of the University s Progress Card the Maroon and Gold Measures adopted by the Board in December. Over time, additional measures of progress Page 5 of 19

will be defined e.g., how many students are participating in GC courses and how does that experience enhance student and career success? This process will entail developing more nuanced criteria for success in important but harder-to-measure dimensions of institutional performance e.g., is interdisciplinary work now easier to pursue on our campus? Is our work having major impact? Questions for Discussion How does the University most effectively ensure alignment of the Twin Cities Strategic Plan with the expectations reflected in the University s Progress Card? Are there elements of the plan that should receive additional attention and energy in 2016-17? Are there issues of alignment between the Twin Cities plan and the system campus plans that need additional attention? BACKGROUND INFORMATION October 2014, Strategic Plan for the Twin Cities Campus, Board of Regents March 2015, Twin Cities Strategic Plan Implementation Steps and Metrics, Board of Regents Annual Strategic Plan updates have been provided to the Board and its committees Page 6 of 19

Driving Tomorrow Driving Transformational Change through Implementation of the UMTC Strategic Plan President Eric W. Kaler and Executive Vice President & Provost Karen Hanson Board of Regents Work Session June 9, 2016 Page 7 of 19

Strategic Framework The plan is a focused framework for accelerating advancement in strategic areas to invigorate the University s core academic mission, building on the signal strengths and opportunities we have as Minnesota s globally engaged land-grant research university. 2 Board of Regents Work Session Office of the Provost June 9, 2016 Page 8 of 19

DRIVING TOMORROW Our ten-year plan to lead and innovate Build exceptional research and curriculum integrating grand societal challenges Capitalize on our location, build a culture of reciprocal engagement Embrace excellence and reject complacency Preeminent in solving the grand challenges of a diverse & changing world Recruit and retain field-shaping researchers and teachers 3 Board of Regents Work Session Office of the Provost June 9, 2016 Page 9 of 19

Implementation Priorities and Progress Integrate into University planning and academic activities Jump-start Grand Challenges curriculum and research Progress across goal areas, campuswide engagement Measure our progress 4 Board of Regents Work Session Office of the Provost June 9, 2016 Page 10 of 19

Grand Challenges Curriculum Address important global issues Engage students in discovery Solution-driven, interdisciplinary learning Page 11 of 19

2015 16 Grand Challenges Courses From global hunger and climate change to conquest of disease and reconciliation and justice. Fall 2015 Can We Feed the World Without Destroying It? Beyond War and Atrocity: Reconciliation and Justice The Fracking Boom: Promises and Challenges of the Hydrocarbon Renaissance Seeking Solutions to Global Health Issues Global Venture Design: What Impact Will You Make? Spring 2016 Climate Change: Myths, Mysteries, and Uncertainties Toward Conquest of Disease Rivers and Cities: Meeting Future Demands on Urban Water Systems Policy and Science of Global Environmental Change The Global Climate Challenge: Creating an Empowered Movement for Change Pathways to Renewable Energy Structural Violence and the Medication Experience Making Sense of Climate Change: Science, Art, and Agency Page 12 of 19

DRIVING TOMORROW Our ten-year plan to lead and innovate Grand Challenges Research Leveraging our exceptional strengths for expanded impact on the most critical challenges of our state, nation, and world. Feeding the World Sustainably Advancing Health through Tailored Solutions Assuring Clean Water and Sustainable Ecosystems Solving the Grand Challenges of a Diverse and Changing World Fostering Just and Equitable Communities Enhancing Individual and Community Capacity for a Changing World Page 13 of 19

Progress Across the Plan Strengthen recruitment and support for field-shaping researchers and teachers Create invigorated campus culture embracing ambition, challenge, innovation, diversity Strengthen reciprocal engagement leveraging location Areas of Focus & Impact Examples: Cluster hiring Campus-community engagement Diverse faculty candidate pools Faculty and staff leadership development Operational excellence Academic program review Strategic framework for academic technology in teaching/learning Interdisciplinary and communityengaged scholarship in P&T Page 14 of 19

Driving Tomorrow: Measuring Our Success A means of advancing our institutional excellence and impact Make the University more nimble and integrative and thereby better serve our students and state Measuring success will align with long-range planning and metrics and benchmarks of the University s Progress Card 9 Board of Regents Work Session Office of the Provost June 9, 2016 Page 15 of 19

Indicators of Success As strategic initiatives expand, we will be in a position to assess how we are moving the dial in specific ways E.g., GC curriculum: Students more engaged, report great student experience, graduate on time E.g., GC research collaborations: R&D expenditures, citations, faculty awards, public service expenditures Page 16 of 19

Measuring Our Progress: GC Curriculum Action Step Process Management Illustrative Goal Measures Develop GC cocurricular education, research, & engagement opportunities Assess pilot and evaluate scalability Pilot liberal ed. requirements evolution to integrate GC courses, minors Student participation in UROP, graduate GC research assistantships; GC courses, minors, & seminars Student participation in internships, local & global outreach/engagement Student experiences as measured on SERU/GradSERU Graduation and alumni survey data 11 Board of Regents Work Session Office of the Provost June 9, 2016 Page 17 of 19

Measuring Our Progress: GC Research Action Step Process Management Illustrative Goal Measures Remove disincentives to collaborative work Embed interdisciplinary work in P & T reviews Seed highpotential interdisciplinary collaborations Assess success in leveraging R&D funding External grant awards Grants with interdisciplinary PI participation Scholarly publication citations Public service expenditures 12 Board of Regents Work Session Office of the Provost June 9, 2016 Page 18 of 19

For Discussion How do we most effectively ensure alignment of the TC Strategic Plan with the expectations reflected in the University s Progress Card? Are there elements of the plan that should receive additional attention and energy in 2016 17? Other discussion questions? 13 Board of Regents Work Session Office of the Provost June 9, 2016 Page 19 of 19