Assessment Policy

Similar documents
Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

MYP personal project guide 2011 overview of objectives

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE AT IVANHOE GRAMMAR SCHOOL. An Introduction to the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme For Students and Families

International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma. Source Material IBO Website, IB Handbook, Kristin School Auckland and a range of other relevant readings.

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Concordia Language Villages STARTALK Teacher Program Curriculum

Copyright Corwin 2015

Quality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses

Teaching in a Specialist Area Unit Level: Unit Credit Value: 15 GLH: 50 AIM Awards Unit Code: GB1/4/EA/019 Unique Reference Y/503/5372

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

AIS KUWAIT. School Improvement Plan (SIP)

PROMOTING QUALITY AND EQUITY IN EDUCATION: THE IMPACT OF SCHOOL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

What does Quality Look Like?

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

International Baccalaureate

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

The Political Engagement Activity Student Guide

Implementing Response to Intervention (RTI) National Center on Response to Intervention

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

International Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Programme (PYP) at Northeast Elementary

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Module Title: Teaching a Specialist Subject

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

EQuIP Review Feedback

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

1. Answer the questions below on the Lesson Planning Response Document.

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Providing Effective Student Feedback. Webinar February 13, 2017

Priorities for CBHS Draft 8/22/17

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

George Mason University College of Education and Human Development Secondary Education Program. EDCI 790 Secondary Education Internship

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

1.1 Examining beliefs and assumptions Begin a conversation to clarify beliefs and assumptions about professional learning and change.

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

Quality Framework for Assessment of Multimedia Learning Materials Version 1.0

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Doctoral Student Experience (DSE) Student Handbook. Version January Northcentral University

Lecturing for Deeper Learning Effective, Efficient, Research-based Strategies

Results In. Planning Questions. Tony Frontier Five Levers to Improve Learning 1

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

Jazz Dance. Module Descriptor.

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

Practice Learning Handbook

Technical Skills for Journalism

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Aligning Assessment to Brain Science

Practice Learning Handbook

Observing Teachers: The Mathematics Pedagogy of Quebec Francophone and Anglophone Teachers

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

SOLUTION-FOCUSED (S.F.) COUNSELLING AT AN INNER CITY SCHOOL, LONDON UK Reflection, Results and Creativity

The International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme at Carey

Using portfolio assessment as an innovation to assess problembased learning in Hong Kong schools

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. Education Leadership Program Course Syllabus

Research-Based Instructional Practices That Maximize Student Learning. Ainsley B. Rose December 7, 2015

KIS MYP Humanities Research Journal

International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Georgia Department of Education

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

Recognition of Prior Learning

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN MARCOS SCHOOL OF EDUCATION

HDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 Version: 2.01

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

A Study of Successful Practices in the IB Program Continuum

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Executive Summary. Mt. Mourne School - An IBO World School

A Model for Planning Learning Experiences to Promote Achievement in Diverse Secondary Classrooms

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

Conditions of study and examination regulations of the. European Master of Science in Midwifery

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

Exhibition Techniques

2nd Grade Media. Goal #1: Inquiry EO #1 - UBD

Executive Summary. Palencia Elementary

FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT K - 12 SOCIAL STUDIES CURRICULUM

International Baccalaureate

A Note on Structuring Employability Skills for Accounting Students

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

Teaching Dossier Dr. Robin Kay. Contents. Dr. Robin Kay Teaching Dossier - Page 1

Planning for Preassessment. Kathy Paul Johnston CSD Johnston, Iowa

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT URBP 236 URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING POLICY ANALYSIS: TOOLS AND METHODS SPRING 2016

Transcription:

Assessment Policy 2017-2018

Developed April 2017 Assessment Policy: Philosophy Mission statement The International School Hannover Region is committed to providing an international education within a creative and caring environment to enable its students to become life-long learners and open-minded, compassionate citizens. What is assessment and what are its aims? At ISHR, we understand that assessment is both a means to and a measure of student learning. Formative assessment focuses on the process of monitoring and advancing student learning. It can take the form of quick in-class questions, or of more extended, formal tasks with the aim of gathering information that can be used by both teacher and student to improve learning. Formative assessment is an ongoing process which takes place throughout a unit of learning. Summative assessment focuses on evaluating student learning at the end of a period of instruction. Summative assessment is varied in form, allowing students to express their learning in different ways. While the aim of summative assessment is to evaluate student learning, it can also be used formatively to guide teachers and students towards areas for improvement. What are the principles of assessment at ISHR? Assessment at ISHR is integral to the teaching and learning process and is used to identify learning intentions and plan the taught curriculum. It identifies what students know, understand, and can do at different stages in the learning process. We strive to develop assessment which is authentic and meaningful, engaging students in tasks which allow them to demonstrate their learning in a variety of ways which reflect or affect realworld tasks and situations. We focus on assessing deeper, concept-based learning rather than the recollection of facts or repetition of ideas. We believe that this type of learning is more enduring and helps students retain more over time. Assessment at ISHR is an ongoing process which involves teacher-assessed, student self-assessed, and peer-assessed tasks which build a picture of learning over time. Students are empowered to take charge of their learning through applying clear criteria which is shared or developed with students before beginning the assessment, and thoughtful reflection on timely feedback. Homework assessments will be valuable, purposeful Assessment identifies what students know, understand, and can do at different stages in the learning process. We strive to assess our students in authentic and meaningful ways which reflect realworld tasks, and not repetition of facts or ideas.

and planned, providing an opportunity to consolidate student learning. There is a consistency of expectations and understanding of criteria through the process of standardization. We aim to provide support and make accommodations for those students with learning needs, allowing access to assessment at an equitable level. Details regarding the process for assessment access requirements can be found in the ISHR Special Needs Policy. Students must ensure that the assessments which they complete are academically honest and that they maintain high levels of academic integrity, as described within the ISHR Academic Honesty Policy. How do we report on assessment at ISHR? We believe it is essential that students and parents are informed of an individual's areas of strength and areas that are in development. All assessment data is recorded in order to monitor, track, and report on student learning. We believe the analysis of assessment data is essential in developing curriculum, differentiating instruction, and improving student learning. To ensure that students can reflect and take action, it is expected that they receive timely written or oral feedback of each summative assessment task. At the end of each semester, reports are issued based on evidence from that period. Student-led or parent-teacher conferences are arranged to demonstrate and discuss student learning. Assessment Practices: Primary Section (PYP) Recording procedures Teachers use a variety of assessment tools to record student progress in the PYP, including: rubrics, checklists, continuums, task or subject-specific criteria, forms, benchmarks/exemplars, and narrative records. Each student has an assessment folder containing records of student achievement maintained by teachers. Criteria based assessment Assessment in the PYP is student centered and designed to develop understanding of the five essential elements: the understanding of concepts, the acquisition of knowledge, the mastering of skills, the development of attitudes and the decision to take action. Students have a clear understanding of what is being assessed, the criteria for success, and the method by which the assessment is made. Active involvement of both students and teachers results in meaningful and accurate assessment. Assessment in the PYP is student centered and includes active involvement of both students and teachers, resulting in meaningful and accurate assessment. External assessment In the PYP, we use a variety of external assessment tools to provide an objective evaluation of student learning. This allows us to measure progress and amend teaching practices to suit the needs

of our students. Assessment Practices: Secondary Section (MYP & DP) Recording procedures A calendar of summative assessment for each year level is published via ManageBac, an internetbased planning, assessment, and reporting platform. The year-level calendar is accessible by students, parents, and faculty; this allows students to effectively manage their workload and faculty and parents to monitor expectations placed upon student learning. In order to track progress, use data to inform learning, and to provide feedback on assessment, accurate records of student achievement are maintained by teachers. These records are accessible by students, their parents, and faculty via Managebac. We will ensure that all new faculty have access to, and an understanding of, the school's Assessment Policy. Criterion based assessment and standardisation In the MYP and DP at ISHR, assessment is centered on the learner and is designed to measure the development and mastery of academic skills required of students in each programme; for example, critical thinking skills, evaluation, clarity, and organisation of thought. In the MYP and DP, we have an emphasis on criterion-related assessment. IB criteria may be modified to enable students to access the full range of available marks in the early stages of the DP. In the MYP, teachers provide age-appropriate assessment by using the interim objectives and criteria provided for MYP years 1, 3 and 5. Each criterion is divided into different achievement levels, which are shown in numerical bands. Each band contains general, qualitative value statements. The level descriptors for each band describe a range of student performance. At the lowest levels, student achievement will be minimal, and as the levels increase, the descriptors describe a higher level of achievement. The teacher should determine if the first descriptor describes the student's performance. If the work exceeds the first descriptor, the teacher should then determine whether it is described by the second descriptor. This process continues until the teacher uses their best judgment to identify the descriptor that best describes the student's work. External assessment For MYP and DP students, assessment is centered on the student and measures the development and mastery of skills such as: critical thinking, evaluation, clarity, and organization of thought. We are committed to standardizing all summative assessment so that each student receives criterion-based feedback and semester grades which are equitable and reliable in evaluating and promoting learning. Within the final year of the MYP, the school sends Personal Project assessment data to the IB for

external moderation in order to meet international standards and provide feedback to teachers/supervisors. We are working towards the implementation of MYP eassessment which will involve both externally assessed on-screen exams and externally moderated student eportfolios. These tasks allow students to demonstrate their learning using relevant tools to solve real world problems. They lead towards the MYP certificate, which may help those who are transferring schools and require equivalency in German certification. Within the IB DP, all students undertake formal summative assessment, which contributes directly to their final IB DP qualification. Within subjects, some formal summative assessments are internally assessed and teachers will evaluate the work to IB standards. These evaluations are then either confirmed or moderated externally by the IB. In May of their final year, students complete a series of examinations which are external and are evaluated by the IB. Assessment data is analysed using a data analysis protocol, to standardize the way data analysis is approached amongst the faculty. Review of Policy The updated ISHR Assessment policy was developed collaboratively by the PYP, MYP, and DP Coordinators during the 2016-2017 school year. Once drafted, the policy was shared among the school community to receive feedback from teachers, students, and parents. The policy will be reviewed and revised on a bi-annual basis by a team that includes our programme coordinators and feedback will be sought from all stakeholders of the school community.

Appendix 1: Bibliography and Further Reading Black, P, Harrison, C, Lee, C, Marshall, B and Wiliam, D. 2002. Working Inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom. London, UK. GL Assessment. Erickson, HL. 2008. Stirring the Head, Heart and Soul: Redefining curriculum and instruction (Third edition). Thousand Oaks, California, USA. Corwin Press. Hattie, John. 2008. Visible Learning: a Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. New York, USA. Routledge. Wiggins, G. 1998. Educative Assessment. Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco, California, USA. Jossey-Bass Publishers. Wiggins, G and McTighe, J. 2005. Understanding by Design (Expanded second edition). Alexandria, Virginia, USA. ASCD Publications.