Professor Joan Freeman: Tehetséges gyermekek Európában
GIFTED CHILDREN IN EUROPE
Gifts and talents are always relative! relative!
Two major influencing and overlapping approaches to gifts and talents
Genetic Western approach Gifted are a tiny minority Most children are rejected Environmental Eastern approach High potential is widespread Most children stand a chance
Western approach fixed selection
IQ SPREAD % of population IQ Score
THE BIG BENEFIT More resources can be put into those who are selected
THE BIG PROBLEM Biases in selection $
There is no SCIENTIFIC evidence that serious emotional or moral problems are directly related to the actual gifts or talents
But frustration can bring boredom and anger
Eastern approach wider opportunities
BIG PROBLEM Too much hard work Hard UK work in USA KOREA
THE BIG BENEFIT More opportunities for excellence
Hard work = high standards
Sweden - 1 Yehudi Menuhin Violin Competition London 2016 All 9 prize winners Korea 3 - First place in juniors China 2 - First place in seniors Taiwan 1 Japan - 1 Germany 1
Gifted Education In Europe Due in print 2017 Javier Tourón & Joan Freeman APA Handbook, (Ed. Steven I. Pfeiffer) Washington,: American Psychological Association
What is happening now in Europe to promote gifts and talents?
Béla Általános Iskola Hejőkeresztú Nagy Emese PhD 60% gypsy children with poor Hungarian 75% disadvantaged (58% extremely) 17% special needs 5% state care 100% go to secondary schools 70% of all the children in the school take final exams
Béla Általános Iskola Hejőkeresztúr Nagy Emese PhD
Teaching in Hejőkeresztú The more pupils speak the more they learn Group work increases socialisation Board games in a dedicated games room Parents interact at school or homes Takes a year for teachers to get going and school also trains others Wide social mix of children of teachers and local doctor s children
Evidence from the European survey
Questionnaires sent out 850 requests 324 responses 34 countries
Albania 0% Andorra 0% Austria 2% Belgium 1% Croatia 2% Czech Republic 1% Denmark 3% Estonia 0% Finland 1% France 1% Georgia 0% Germany 7% Greece 2% Hungary 7% Ireland 2% Italy 1% Latvia 0% Lithuania 0% Luxembourg 0% Netherlands 15% Norway 4% Poland 1% Portugal 0% Romania 2% Russia 2% Serbia 2% Slovakia 0% Slovenia 6% Spain 18% Sweden 3% Switzerland 2% Turkey 5% Ukraine 1% United Kingdom 7%
Who replied? Administrators 13% Normal school teachers 21% Special teachers for the gifted 15% Tutors 13% Researchers 25% Psychologists 13%
Increase in concern 23.51% involved at least 15 years 38.24% involved 5 years or less But only - 60% reported legislation 33% reported any guidelines
Steady increase in gifted education in Europe 2003 2015
Most in mixed classrooms
European teachers usually make their own decisions about a student s potential to reach excellence and any need for special education. How do they do it?
Teacher identification Teachers' judgement 80% Grade marks Parents 62% 62% Standard intelligence test Other tests Educational psychologist Learners' course work 54% 51% 46% 42% Open provision Creativity test Other 22% 20% 27%
Acceleration little in Europe
European acceleration in practice 70% of teachers refuse grade-skipping 59% offer an advanced curriculum 42% offer a faster pace
PLENTY OF ENRICHMENT WITHIN SCHOOL HOURS AFTER SCHOOL HOURS PRIVATE INITIATIVES
Generous extra-curricular provision everywhere
Botany in England
Templeton Gifted Tábor
What works What we need to do OPPORTUNITY! Recognise diversity Hard work with specialist teaching Whole school approach Assessment of ability Changing others attitudes
The European Council for High Ability Three major contributions
Networking
First ECHA Diploma UK 1994
Fuszek Csilla Budapest, 2013 10 th May
THE FUTURE LOOKS BRIGHT
Gifted Education In Europe Javier Tourón & Joan Freeman WWW.JoanFreeman.com APA Handbook, (Ed. Steven I. Pfeiffer) Washington,: American Psychological Association