s PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION Final PART 1: COURSE SUMMARY INFORMATION Course summary Final award Intermediate award Course status Awarding body School Location of study/ campus Partner institution(s) BSc (Hons) Aeronautical Engineering (top up) BSc Engineering Validated University of Brighton Computing, Engineering and Mathematics Moulsecoomb Name of institution Host department Course status 1. SELECT 2. 3. Admissions Admissions agency Entry requirements Include any progression opportunities into the course. Start date (mmm-yy) Normally September Mode of study UCAS Check the University's website for current entry requirements. The entry requirements listed here are our typical offer for this course if you wish to begin studying with us in 2017. They should be used as a general guide. We operate a flexible admissions policy this means that you could receive a lower conditional offer than the typical offer, informed by our assessment of your complementary non-academic achievements and experiences. For courses that require interview or portfolio review, this may also be considered in the level of any conditional offer that follows if your application is successful. Foundation degree/hnd in a relevant subject, with an overall merit grade (60 per cent) profile. For non-native speakers of English: IELTS 6.0 overall, 6.0 in writing and a minimum of 5.5 in the other elements. Sep-17 Mode of study Duration of study (standard) Maximum registration period Full-time 1 year 4 years Part-time 2 years 4 years Sandwich Other: not applicable Other: not applicable Distance Other: not applicable Other: not applicable Page 1 of 10
Course codes/categories UCAS code Contacts Course Leader (or Course Development Leader) Admissions Tutor Examination and Assessment H414 Dr Nicolas Miché Dr Shaun Lee Name Place of work Date tenure expires External Examiner(s) Mr P Lewis Coventry University September 2020 Examination Board(s) (AEB/CEB) Engineering Approval and review Approval date Review date Validation June 2009 1 November 2015 2 Programme Specification January 2017 3 Jan 2018 4 Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Body 1 (if applicable): The Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Body 2 (if applicable): The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Body 3 (if applicable): May 2015 5 May 2015 May 2017 6 (accredited up to and inc. 2019) May 2017 (accredited up to and inc. 2019) 1 Date of original validation. 2 Date of most recent periodic review (normally academic year of validation + 5 years). 3 Month and year this version of the programme specification was approved (normally September). 4 Date programme specification will be reviewed (normally approval date + 1 year). If programme specification is applicable to a particular cohort, please state here. 5 Date of original approval by the Professional, Statutory or Regulatory Body (PSRB) 6 Date of most recent review by accrediting/ approving external body. Page 2 of 10
PART 2: COURSE DETAILS AIMS AND LEARNING OUTCOMES Aims The aims of the course are: To demonstrate an understanding of the complete process involved in light aircraft design. To be able to assimilate an aircraft s performance through the application of theoretical and computational analysis and synthesis and the use of wind tunnel and free flight modelling. To demonstrate an understanding of the mechanisms of control and stability of aircraft in subsonic flight. To produce graduates with skills, knowledge and understanding commensurate with the educational base of the level of an Incorporated Engineer. To demonstrate an understanding of the effects of structure and propulsion on aircraft performance, stability and control. To acquire the theoretical and practical background required to be able to understand and apply critical judgements to the aerodynamic design of aircraft. To develop the ability to assimilate and apply aeronautical engineering principles and business methods to a competitive environment. To understand of the current practice and limitations, codes of practice, sustainability, environment and safety issues associated with the aeronautical engineering industry. Learning outcomes The outcomes of the main award provide information about how the primary aims are demonstrated by students following the course. These are mapped to external reference points where appropriate 7. Knowledge and theory Skills Includes intellectual skills (i.e. generic skills relating to academic study, problem solving, evaluation, research etc.) and professional/ practical skills. On successful completion of the course students will be able to: 1. Demonstrate an understanding of scientific principles in the development and analysis of engineering solutions to practical aeronautical engineering problems. 2. and apply appropriate computer based methods and be able to assess the underlying limitations of particular methods. 3. Demonstrate a wide knowledge and comprehensive understanding of design principles of light aircraft elements. 4. Demonstrate an understanding of management practices within legal, professional and ethical constraints. 5. Effectively communicate information within a business and social context. 6. Independently develop knowledge and skills in related disciplines. 7. Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of current practice and limitations, codes of practice and safety issues in the aeronautical engineering sector. 8. Apply computer based engineering tools to solve unfamiliar problems in aeronautical engineering. 9. Conduct wind tunnel tests to estimate aircraft performance 10. Apply knowledge creatively to generate a range of solutions and make value judgements. 11. Critically evaluate appropriate engine modelling and analysis software. 12. Evaluate technical and business risks within the requirements of commercial and industrial constraints. 13. Plan and manage a programme of work. 14. Acquired the theoretical and practical background required to be able to understand and apply critical judgements to the aerodynamic design of aircraft 7 Please refer to Course Development and Review Handbook or QAA website for details. Page 3 of 10
QAA subject benchmark statement (where applicable) 8 UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence, UK-SPEC, published by the Engineering Council UK, ECUK. PROFESSIONAL, STATUTORY AND REGULATORY BODIES (where applicable) Where a course is accredited by a PSRB, full details of how the course meets external requirements, and what students are required to undertake, are included. Accredited by the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) on behalf of the Engineering Council for the purposes of fully meeting the academic requirement for registration as an Incorporated Engineer and partially meeting the academic requirement for registration as a Chartered Engineer. Accredited by the Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) on behalf of the Engineering Council for the purposes of fully meeting the academic requirement for registration as an Incorporated Engineer and partially meeting the academic requirement for registration as a Chartered Engineer. A mapping with the UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence, UK-SPEC, published by the Engineering Council UK, ECUK, was employed to derive the learning outcomes for the programme. LEARNING AND TEACHING Learning and teaching methods This section sets out the primary learning and teaching methods, including total learning hours and any specific requirements in terms of practical/ clinical-based learning. The indicative list of learning and teaching methods includes information on the proportion of the course delivered by each method and details where a particular method relates to a particular element of the course. The information included in this section complements that found in the Key Information Set (KIS), with the programme specification providing further information about the learning and teaching methods used on the course. A variety of teaching and learning methods will be used. These will include lectures, tutorials, student and tutor led seminars, laboratory and computer workshops, projects, group projects, and problem based learning scenarios requiring specialist research. The 40 credit Group Project module (XE337) will be used to enhance student-centred learning. This is a substantially research group project with significant independent effort that is negotiated, designed and completed in collaboration with at least one identified academic supervisor. Other modules also incorporate projects and assignments that are carried out in groups to encourage teamwork. All study is supported by learning materials that are made available to students via a virtual learning environment (Studentcentral) accessed via the internet. ASSESSMENT Assessment methods This section sets out the summative assessment methods on the course and includes details on where to find further information on the criteria used in assessing coursework. It also provides an assessment matrix which reflects the variety of modes of assessment, and the volume of assessment in the course. The information included in this section complements that found in the Key Information Set (KIS), with the programme specification providing further information about how the course is assessed. All modules are assessed using the assessment criteria detailed within the individual modules, which are linked to the learning outcomes for that module. A range of assessment methods will be used. Assessment methods include coursework assignments, laboratory reports, project reports, viva voce and closed book written examinations. 8 Please refer to the QAA website for details. Page 4 of 10
A mixture of formative and summative assessment are utilised throughout the programme. Apart from formal unseen examinations, assessment is carried out on laboratory work, dissertations, case studies, design projects and the final year project. Presentation may be by written report, oral presentation, wall displays or combinations of these. Students are encouraged to use word processing, spreadsheets, CAD packages and databases whenever appropriate. Learning Outcome Assessment method Module Number of credits 80 1. Demonstrate an understanding of scientific principles in the development and analysis of engineering solutions to practical aeronautical engineering problems. 2. and apply appropriate computer based methods and be able to assess the underlying limitations of particular methods. 3. Demonstrate a wide knowledge and comprehensive understanding of design principles of light aircraft elements. 4. Demonstrate an understanding of management practices within legal, professional and ethical constraints. 5. Effectively communicate information within a business and social context. 6. Independently develop knowledge and skills in related disciplines. 7. Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of current practice and limitations, codes of practice and safety issues in the aeronautical engineering sector. 8. Apply computer based engineering tools to solve unfamiliar problems in aeronautical engineering. 9. Conduct wind tunnel tests to estimate aircraft performance 10. Apply knowledge creatively to generate a range of solutions and make value judgements. Examination, Coursework, project Coursework, lab work, project Examination, Coursework, Project ME250, ME352, ME351, ME350. ME250, ME352, XE337. ME250, ME352, ME351, XE337. 80 100 Coursework, project ME351, XE337. 60 Viva Voce, Poster display Project report, coursework Project, coursework, labwork, practical Computer based coursework Lab work Coursework, poster display, project ME250, XE337, ME351. ME250, XE337, ME351, ME352, ME350. ME250, ME351, XE337, ME352. 80 120 100 ME250, XE337. 60 ME250, ME352, ME351, XE337. 100 ME351, XE337. 60 11. Critically evaluate appropriate engine modelling and analysis software. Project, Lab work, coursework ME250, ME351, XE337. 80 12. Evaluate technical and business risks within the requirements of commercial and industrial constraints. Coursework, examination 13. Plan and manage a programme of work. Project, coursework, lab work ME351. 20 ME351, XE337. 60 Page 5 of 10
14. Acquired the theoretical and practical background required to be able to understand and apply critical judgements to the aerodynamic design of aircraft XE337, ME250, ME352, ME351. 100 SUPPORT AND INFORMATION Institutional/ University Course-specific Additional support, specifically where courses have nontraditional patterns of delivery (e.g. distance learning and work-based learning) include: All students benefit from: University induction week Student Handbook: the University and you Course Handbook Extensive library facilities Computer pool rooms E-mail address Welfare service Personal tutor for advice and guidance studentcentral (virtual learning environment) In addition, students on this course benefit from: The School s extensive laboratory facilities including the CAE s Sir Harry Ricardo Laboratories and the Flight Simulator. Industrially relevant projects and assignments through the School s Industrial Advisory Board, Knowledge Transfer Programmes and other industrial collaborations. Personal tutor for advice and guidance Placements Office to help students get an industrial placement and support them during their placement. Specialist engineering software. Research Informed Teaching Teaching is informed by research of very high quality. In the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise 95% the School s engineering research was judged to be of international quality of which 70% was internationally leading, by the Unit of Assessment for Mechanical, Aeronautical and Manufacturing Engineering. Lecturers teaching level 6 modules deliver on their specialist research fields. Examples would be members of the Sir Harry Ricardo Laboratories lecturing on internal combustion engines. Two key features of the research environment identified by the RAE panel were strong industrial links and the quality of experimental facilities. The course benefits from a wide range of industrial input. This ranges from guest lectures on state-of-the-art technology to support for projects. Research income has also been used to develop teaching laboratories to support experimental activities in a number of topics including: thermodynamics, control systems, instrumentation and sensors, and fluid mechanics. It is anticipated that the recent addition of the Vetronics Research Centre, VRC, to the School (the only Academic Centre of Excellence in the UK conducting research and training in the subject area of Vehicle Electronics) will provide opportunities to support a range of activities in these modules in addition to providing inspiration for projects. Education for Sustainable Development Sustainability is a core element of engineering practice. This can be seen across a range of disciplines from the selection of a manufacturing process (energy cost and environmental impact) to the design of a road vehicle power train (response to legislation and energy resources). As such sustainable development has always been an implicit element in many modules. Page 6 of 10
Students are introduced to concepts of sustainability and ethics throughout the course. The level 6 module ME351 Aircraft Design and Management students will be given problems in relating to globalisation issues. The course aims to enhance the awareness of sustainable development that students developed on earlier courses by developing scientific and research skills, and critical thinking. Page 7 of 10
PART 3: COURSE SPECIFIC REGULATIONS COURSE STRUCTURE This section includes an outline of the structure of the programme, including stages of study and progression points. Course Leaders may choose to include a structure diagram here. This course is available to study as a one-year of full-time study or can be taken part-time over a minimum of two years. It provides an honours degree pathway to those who have completed a foundation degree in automotive engineering or a related subject or to those who have completed an HND. A single module is 10 credits (equivalent to 100 hours of learning) with full-time students studying for 120 credits each year. The programme structure combines the study of 20 and 40 credit modules for the year. Part-time students follow the same programme. Students will take 20 credits at level 5 and 100 credits at level 6. The modules are selected such that the student will emerge as a graduate with theoretical and practical experience of Aeronautical engineering systems. The Group Project module, XE337, provides an opportunity for the student to demonstrate their professional and technical competence in executing a complex self-directed group project. Students will also demonstrate research, analysis, synthesis, technical depth and engineering application within their chosen area of automotive engineering. The course learning outcomes have been mapped against Engineering Council s UKSPEC to ensure that the competences for IEng status are being met. Modules Status: M = Mandatory (modules which must be taken and passed to be eligible for the award) C = Compulsory (modules which must be taken to be eligible for the award) O = Optional (optional modules) A = Additional (modules which must be taken to be eligible for an award accredited by a professional, statutory or regulatory body, including any non-credit bearing modules) Level 9 Module code Status Module title Credit 5 ME250 C Aeronautical Instrumentation 20 6 XE337 C Group Project 40 6 ME351 C Aircraft Design and Management Project 20 6 ME352 C Aerospace Propulsion Systems and Avionics 20 6 ME350 C Advanced Materials Engineering 20 Semester 1 Semester 2 ME250 Aeronautical Instrumentati on 20 Credits XE337 Group Project 40 Credits (30/10) ME350 Advanced Materials Engineering 20 Credits ME351 Aircraft Design and Management Project 20 Credits ME352 Aerospace Propulsion Systems and Avionics 20 Credits 9 All modules have learning outcomes commensurate with the FHEQ levels 0, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. List the level which corresponds with the learning outcomes of each module. Page 8 of 10
AWARD AND CLASSIFICATION Award type Award* Title Level Eligibility for award Classification of award Final BSc (Hons) Total credits 10 Minimum credits 11 Ratio of marks 12 : Class of award Aeronautical Engineering 6 Total credit 120 Minimum credit at level of award 100 Intermediate BSc Engineering 6 Total credit 60 Minimum credit at level of award 60 Total credit Minimum credit at level of award Total credit Minimum credit at level of award Total credit Minimum credit at level of award *Foundation degrees only Progression routes from award: Levels 5 and 6 (17:83) Level 6 marks Honours degree Unclassified degree Award classifications Mark/ band % Foundation degree Honours degree Postgraduate 13 degree (excludes PGCE and BM BS) 70% - 100% Distinction First (1) Distinction 60% - 69.99% Merit Upper second (2:1) Merit 50% - 59.99% Lower second (2:2) Pass 40% - 49.99% Third (3) Pass 10 Total number of credits required to be eligible for the award. 11 Minimum number of credits required, at level of award, to be eligible for the award. 12 Algorithm used to determine the classification of the final award (all marks are credit-weighted). For a Masters degree, the mark for the final element (e.g, dissertation) must be in the corresponding class of award. 13 Refers to taught provision: PG Cert, PG Dip, Masters. Page 9 of 10
EXAMINATION AND ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS Please refer to the Course Approval and Review Handbook when completing this section. The examination and assessment regulations for the course should be in accordance with the University s General Examination and Assessment Regulations for Taught Courses (available from staffcentral or studentcentral). Specific regulations which materially affect assessment, progression and award on the course e.g. Where referrals or repeat of modules are not permitted in line with the University s General Examination and Assessment Regulations for Taught Courses. The course regulations are in accordance with the University's General Examination and Assessment Regulations (available from the School Office, or Academic Services) In addition, the following course-specific regulations apply: This is a single stage course designed to follow a Foundation degree. The BSc (Hons) classification will be based on a weighted average of all the modules taken during the stage (100 CATS at Level 6 and 20 CATS at Level 5). Referrals in all modules maybe granted, but only to allow the student to earn the requisite number of CATS points for the award. Students will not normally be allowed to repeat the project module, XE337. Exceptions required by PSRB These require the approval of the Chair of the Academic Board The IMechE and IET stipulate that: Compensation can only be applied if all the PSRB learning outcomes (shown in the mapping to AHEP) have been met by modules that have been passed. At each stage of the course compensation can be applied up to a maximum of one sixth of the credits available 1. Normally compensation can only be applied when a module mark is no more than 10 marks below the pass mark 2. 1 For undergraduate courses with 120 credits per stage the maximum compensation would be 20 credits. For single stage masters courses with 180 credits per stage the maximum compensation would be 30 credits. 2 In the case of level 0, 4, 5 and 6 modules the minimum mark would be 30. In the case of level 7 modules the minimum mark would be 40. Document template revised: 2010 Page 10 of 10