ARKANSAS SUPERINTENDENT EVALUATION SYSTEM Performance Ratings on Goals and Standards (Superintendent Self-Assessment)

Similar documents
California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

School Leadership Rubrics

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Residency Principal and Program Administrator Internship and Certification Handbook

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

State Parental Involvement Plan

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

Strategic Plan Dashboard

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

The 21st Century Principal

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

No Parent Left Behind

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

The Mission of Teacher Education in a Center of Pedagogy Geared to the Mission of Schooling in a Democratic Society.

Program Guidebook. Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

MATHS Required September 2017/January 2018

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

School Experience Reflective Portfolio

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

4a: Reflecting on Teaching

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

Trends & Issues Report

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

Plans for Pupil Premium Spending

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

An Introduction to LEAP

COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

TALKING POINTS ALABAMA COLLEGE AND CAREER READY STANDARDS/COMMON CORE

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

School Data Profile/Analysis

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Approval Authority: Approval Date: September Support for Children and Young People

Somerset Progressive School Planning, Assessment, Recording & Celebration Policy

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

Alma Primary School. School report. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. Inspection dates March 2015

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

Sul Ross State University Spring Syllabus for ED 6315 Design and Implementation of Curriculum

La Grange Park Public Library District Strategic Plan of Service FY 2014/ /16. Our Vision: Enriching Lives

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Information Pack: Exams Officer. Abbey College Cambridge

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Fundraising 101 Introduction to Autism Speaks. An Orientation for New Hires

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Department of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University

University of Toronto

For the Ohio Board of Regents Second Report on the Condition of Higher Education in Ohio

Priorities for CBHS Draft 8/22/17

Changes to GCSE and KS3 Grading Information Booklet for Parents

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Synthesis Essay: The 7 Habits of a Highly Effective Teacher: What Graduate School Has Taught Me By: Kamille Samborski

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Trainee Handbook. In Collaboration With. University of Arkansas for Medical Science (UAMS)

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Mooresville Charter Academy

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Teacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

Transcription:

ARKANSAS SUPERINTENDENT EVALUATION SYSTEM Performance Ratings on Goals and Standards (Superintendent Self-Assessment) GOALS RATINGS Superintendent s Performance Rating for Goal 1 Not Meeting Goal = Progress toward implementing actions and meeting goal is consistently below acceptable and is considered inadequate. = Demonstrates many of the characteristics associated with effective performance, although there may be a few exceptions or inconsistencies = Performance is fully satisfactory. This is the rigorous expected level of performance. = Practice significantly exceeds and could serve as a model of practice regionally or statewide. Check one box for each action and circle the overall goal rating. Goal 1: Teaching and Learning The academic achievement of students will improve by 5% and the achievement gap among student subgroups will narrow by 10% or more. Action 1-1 Action 1-2 Action 1-3 Action 1-4 Action 1-5 Overall Rating for Goal 1 Not Meeting Standards All actions have been implemented across the district and on each campus. Because there is evidence to show that they are benefitting students, these actions need to be continued in the next cycle with emphasis on analyzing formative and summative data routinely to determine weaknesses and barriers to learning where students aren t achieving adequately. My own response as we move forward is to set expectations and accountability along with additional encouragement and provision of adequate resources (training and PD, finance, personnel) that will improve instructional interventions for all students. Need to especially continue informing board of new strategies and approaches so that they are prepared to respond to parents who question the changes we are making in curriculum and instruction. Form B - 1 of 10

Superintendent s Performance Rating for Goal 2 Goal 2: (a) Superintendent will insure that a strategic planning process is completed in which the district leadership team (superintendent and board) will determine the district s identity (its vision, mission, values, beliefs, and goals) including articulated vision/mission/goals and implementation strategies for improvements and changes that aim to attain improved achievement for all students. (b) Superintendent will insure that a planning process is completed for each campus to determine each school s vision/mission/goals and implementation strategies aimed at improving student achievement levels for all its students. Action 2-1 Action 2-2 Action 2-3 Action 2-4 Action 2-5 Action 2-6 Overall Rating for Goal 2 Not Meeting Standards All of the actions for this goal have been carried out and completed this cycle but should continue during the next cycle. We don t need to lay our plans aside and not use them. We must continue to use them very publically as our guide (or change them if they appear to no longer be meeting our needs). I will continue to have discussions with each principal and monitor their implementation of their plans as well as making sure each plan remains relevant for their current needs and their working toward meeting their vision and mission. Form B - 2 of 10

Superintendent s Performance Rating for Goal 3 Goal 3: The district will develop strategies to ensure that its staff is stable and highly qualified. Action 3-1 Action 3-2 Action 3-3 Action 3-4 Overall Rating for Goal 3 Not Meeting Standards All actions were completed but I believe that we still need to look for better and perhaps more creative ways to recruit the best staff for our district when we have open positions. Form B - 3 of 10

STANDARDS RATINGS Superintendent s Performance Rating for Standard 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals Not Meeting Goal = Progress toward implementing actions and meeting goal is consistently below acceptable and is considered inadequate. = Demonstrates many of the characteristics associated with effective performance, although there may be a few exceptions or inconsistencies = Performance is fully satisfactory. This is the rigorous expected level of performance. = Practice significantly exceeds and could serve as a model of practice regionally or statewide. 1-A. Collaboratively develops and implements a shared vision and mission 1-B. Collects and uses data to identify goals, assesses organizational effectiveness, and promotes organizational learning 1-C. Creates and implements plans to achieve goals 1-D. Promotes continuous and sustainable improvement through a systemic process of evaluation and plan revision Overall Rating for Standard 1 The superintendent promotes the success of every student by facilitating development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by all appropriate stakeholders. Not Meeting Standards Form B - 4 of 10

This is one of the most improved areas for this cycle. We had a district vision and mission but no real plan that included well thought-out goals, actions, and strategies. The campuses did not have plans. Although it has required significant staff and board time and work, the development of our plans has helped us all create a more systematic approach to what our district is doing in its efforts to make sure the needs of all students are being considered and addressed. We are using data to help us make decisions about what s working and what isn t and responding accordingly. The board is feeling much more comfortable with data. This has helped the district team (me and the board) focus our efforts and I believe we understand one another and are working more collaboratively. The principals report that their own campus teams are now working more as teams. As stated in the Goal #1 summary, we do need to make sure and continue what we ve started here and not forget to follow our plan and make sure it s updated and relevant as needed. Form B - 5 of 10

Superintendent s Performance Rating for Standard 2: Teaching and Learning 2-A. Nurtures and sustains a culture of collaboration, trust, learning, and high academic expectations 2-B. Promotes and supports a comprehensive, rigorous, and coherent curricular program 2-C. Promotes and supports a personalized and motivating learning environment for students 2-D. Employs research-anchored and valid systems of performance management 2-E. Ensures supervision of instructional program 2-F. Ensures the development of assessment and accountability systems to monitor student progress 2-G. Develops the instructional and leadership capacity of staff 2-H. Maximizes time spent on quality instruction 2-I. Promotes the use of the most effective and appropriate technologies to support teaching and learning 2-J. Monitors and evaluates the impact of the instructional program 2-K. Establishes systems to recruit and recommends for employment qualified leaders, teachers, and other professional staff Overall Rating for Standard 2 The superintendent promotes the success of every student by advocating, nurturing, and sustaining a district culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth. Not Meeting Standards This is my area of strength and I believe our district-wide increase in academic achievement shows that we are improving teaching and learning across the district. There are two areas of concern one is a few staff members that are reluctant to comply with the instructional strategies that have been adopted by their campus which can be confirmed through their students outcomes. Second is concern about the campus leadership at the high school. I will work more closely with all of the principals to ensure that they feel skilled AND supported in increasing accountability among those staff members who are resistant. I will particularly focus on working with the high school s leadership to set expectations, offer support as needed, and hold them accountable as appropriate. Form B - 6 of 10

Superintendent s Performance Rating for Standard 3: Managing Organizational Systems and Safety 3-A. Monitors and evaluates the management and operational systems 3-B. Obtains, allocates, aligns, and efficiently utilizes human, fiscal, and technological resources 3-C. Promotes and protects the welfare and safety of students and staff 3-D. Ensures the development of a culture of trust where productive relationships thrive 3-E. Develops the capacity for distributed leadership 3-F. Ensures teacher and organizational time is focused to support quality instruction and student learning Overall Rating for Standard 3 An education leader promotes the success of every student by ensuring management of the organization, operation, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment. Not Meeting Standards Basic Our district is well-managed because I have such a good team of departmental and campus leaders in place. We meet regularly as a team to give updates to each other so that we can be sure that we are working together toward the same ends and can respond when there are problems. Form B - 7 of 10

Superintendent s Performance Rating for Standard 4: Collaborating with Families and Stakeholders 4-A. Collects and analyzes data and information pertinent to the educational environment 4-B. Promotes understanding, appreciation, and use of the community s diverse cultural, social, and intellectual resources 4-C. Builds and sustains positive relationships with families and caregivers 4-D. Builds and sustains productive relationships with community partners Overall Rating for Standard 4 The superintendent promotes the success of every student by collaborating with faculty and community members, responding to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources. Not Meeting Standards We have begun using data to assess how we are doing in most of our operations. Our board understands how to use data and is often asking for data-based reports much more that they have in previous years. As we have worked (related to Goal #1) to focus on ALL kids achievement, we are much more sensitive to our needier students who may not have gotten the interventions they needed up to now. Our curriculum directors and principals have done a lot of studying of the research to see what is effective in improving the achievement among our subgroups especially our economically disadvantaged and our special education students. They have provided additional training to staff and in doing this have raised the expectation on their campuses that these students needs would be better met. Because of my intense focus on internal operations, I have been inconsistent and lacking in my efforts to increase community involvement and make sure that I am out mixing in the community and getting the message out about what we are doing and why we are doing it. Because of this, I think this should be an area for a PGP goal to be developed for implementation next cycle. Form B - 8 of 10

Superintendent s Performance Rating for Standard 5: Ethics and Integrity 5-A. Ensures a system of accountability for every student s academic and social success 5-B. Models principles of self-awareness, reflective practice, transparency, and ethical behavior 5-C. Safeguards the values of democracy, equity, and diversity 5-D. Considers and evaluates the potential moral and legal consequences of decision-making 5-E. Promotes social justice and ensure that individual student needs inform all aspects of schooling Overall Rating for Standard 5 The superintendent promotes the success of every student by acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner. Not Meeting Standards I am a perpetual reflector constantly analyzing my practice and its outcomes to see if I can determine ways to get better at what I am asked to accomplish. I treat all with dignity and listen to their points-of-view. because I truly am here to make a difference whatever it takes! Form B - 9 of 10

Superintendent s Performance Rating for Standard 6: The Education System 6-A. Advocates for children, families, and caregivers 6-B. Acts to influence local, district, state, and national decisions affecting student learning 6-C. Assesses, analyzes, and anticipates emerging trends and initiatives in order to adapt leadership strategies Overall Rating for Standard 6 The superintendent promotes the success of every student by understanding, responding to, and influencing the political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context. Not Meeting Standards This is an area where I struggle. Although I read and study the research trends regarding best practices, etc. I am not going beyond our own district walls and community to advocate or try to influence education in the state, which in turn, affect our district. This too is an area that I should focus on in the next cycle. I need to attend more meetings and become more involved in legislative advocacy in Arkansas. As our systems become more routine I believe that I will feel more comfortable leaving the district for this. Superintendent s Signature: Date: Form B - 10 of 10