Summary of Yield Ratios by Geographic and Demographic Characteristics

Similar documents
Unequal Opportunity in Environmental Education: Environmental Education Programs and Funding at Contra Costa Secondary Schools.

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Demographic Analysis for Alameda Unified School District

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Access Center Assessment Report

Fruitvale Station Shopping Center > Retail

Educational Attainment

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report


STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

Wright State University

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Audit Of Teaching Assignments. An Integrated Analysis of Teacher Educational Background and Courses Taught October 2007

School of Engineering Foothill College Transfer Guide

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

LEN HIGHTOWER, Ph.D.

Azusa Pacific University Azusa, CA

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

12-month Enrollment

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Foothill College: Academic Program Awards and Related Student Headcount, to

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

Presentation Team. Dr. Tony Ross, Vice President for Student Affairs, CSU Los Angeles

WASC Special Visit Research Proposal: Phase IA. WASC views the Administration at California State University, Stanislaus (CSUS) as primarily

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Junior Scheduling Assembly. February 22, 2017

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

The Art and Science of Predicting Enrollment

The Ohio State University. Colleges of the Arts and Sciences. Bachelor of Science Degree Requirements. The Aim of the Arts and Sciences

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE. INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE (Excellence and Accountability)

Best Colleges Main Survey

Guide to the Program in Comparative Culture Records, University of California, Irvine AS.014

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

WINNIPEG, MANITOBA, CANADA

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

SCHOOL. Wake Forest '93. Count

EDELINA M. BURCIAGA 3151 Social Science Plaza Irvine, CA

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Little Rock, AR

CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO Transfer Credit Agreement Catalog

History. 344 History. Program Student Learning Outcomes. Faculty and Offices. Degrees Awarded. A.A. Degree: History. College Requirements

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Peru State College Peru, NE

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Shelters Elementary School

University of Michigan - Flint Flint, MI

Major Classic FIG Fusion FIG Residential FIG Learning Community Business: The CEOs The World of. Designing Your Future in. Future in Engineering

College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Degree Program and Minor List

JOSHUA GERALD LEPREE

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

CI at a Glance. ttp://

Idaho Public Schools

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

The Diversity of STEM Majors and a Strategy for Improved STEM Retention

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

Curriculum Vitae JOHANNA A. SOLOMON, PhD

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

LIM College New York, NY

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Fashion Design Program Articulation

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

University of Arizona

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

User Manual. Understanding ASQ and ASQ PLUS /ASQ PLUS Express and Planning Your Study

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Data Diskette & CD ROM

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

1) AS /AA (Rev): Recognizing the Integration of Sustainability into California State University (CSU) Academic Endeavors

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Transcription:

Summary of Yield Ratios by Geographic and Demographic Characteristics CSU East Bay Office of Planning and Institutional Research March 11, 2013 Contents 1 Summary of Applicants, Admits, and Enrolled First-Time Freshmen 2 1.1 Total Applicants, Admits, and Enrolled First-Time Freshmen...................... 2 1.2 Distribution by Demographics........................................ 2 1.3 Funnel Statistics by Race/Ethnicity.................................... 4 2 Final Admission Status and Yield by Academic Preparedness 6 2.1 Final Admission Status by High School GPA............................... 6 2.2 Final Admission Status by SAT Score (1600)............................... 7 2.3 High School GPA and SAT Score by CA Residency and Final Admission Status............ 8 2.4 Yield by High School GPA and SAT Score................................. 11 3 Final Admission Status by Region 13 3.1 Geographic Density Applied-Not-Admitted Students........................... 15 3.2 Geographic Density of Admitted-Not-Enrolled Students......................... 16 3.3 Geographic Density of Enrolled Students.................................. 17 3.4 Geographic Density of Students by Originating High School - All Final Admission Statuses..... 18 4 High Schools 19 4.1 Top 45 High Schools by Final Admission Status.............................. 19 4.2 High Schools by Final Admission Status, Average and SAT Score, and Yield Rates..... 20 4.3 Top High Schools for STEM, Non-STEM Enrolling Students....................... 21 4.4 Yield by Major Interest, STEM and Non-STEM............................. 23 1

Executive Summary African American and Pacific Islander students are admitted at lower rates and enroll at higher rates, with the opposite being true for American Indian and White students (Figure 3) Enrolled students are most strongly represented just above the Admissions Index requirements for High School GPA and SAT score (Figures 6 & 7) Students with higher High School GPAs yield at lower rates, with the difference being larger with regards to SAT scores (Table 4, Figures 9 & 10) Geographic regions with relatively high density of Admitted-Not-Enrolled students and low density of Enrolled students include Dublin/Pleasanton, San Jose, and San Francisco (Figures 13 & 14) Introduction This research has been conducted in order to provide contextual information and analysis useful for evaluating and improving the effectiveness of First-Time Freshmen recruitment efforts. The focus of this report is on yield rates by originating high school, geographic region, student demographics, and academic preparedness. As a result of understanding the degree of recruitment effectiveness in the context of these variables, more informed choices can be made about directing resources to most effectively yield the best students at the highest rates. Also, this summary is intended to be useful for identifying additional questions for further study. Please note, Final Admission Status in this report refers to the most advanced admissions stage a potential student reaches in the admissions process. The stages are mutually exclusive. For example, a student who applies, is admitted, but does not enroll would be counted only among the Admits. This allows for an unduplicated headcount when looking at the entire pool, and provides information about rate-of-flow through the admissions funnel. 1 Summary of Applicants, Admits, and Enrolled First-Time Freshmen 1.1 Total Applicants, Admits, and Enrolled First-Time Freshmen Applicants, Admits, and Enrolled students for Fall 2009 and Fall 2012 are the focus of this summary. These are the two most recent quarters representing typical Fall term admission processing practices and enrollment patterns with few Chancellor s Office enrollment management constraints. In 2010 and 2011 different data management practices were employed to define an admitted student, and therefore these data cannot be combined with those from other years, as Table 1 illustrates. Fall 2009 Fall 2010* Fall 2011* Fall 2012 Total Applicants 8,789 100% 10,134 100% 11,013 100% 13,048 100% Total Admits 5,589 63.5% 3,106 31.6% 2,619 23.8% 8,171 62.6% Total Enrolled 1,437 25.7% 1,198 38.6% 1,215 46.4% 1,570 19.2% (Not mutually-exclusive categories) Table 1: Admissions Counts, Applicant/Admitted Yield Ratios, and Admitted/Enrolled Yield Ratios 1.2 Distribution by Demographics Falls 2009 and 2012 each saw large First-Time Freshmen classes (1,437 and 1,570). The proportions of Enrolled students has shifted somewhat across racial/ethnic categories, most notably with increases in Hispanic and African American students in 2012. Headcounts by Gender and Race/Ethnicity appear in Table 2. The same data are displayed graphically in Figure 2 as yield ratios Applicant-Admitted and Admitted-Enrolled. Figure 1 illustrates how the shape of the funnel is defined by the ratio of Applicants who are Admitted, and the ratio of Admitted students who Enrolled. 2

Applicants Admitted Enrolled F09 F12 Tot F09 F12 Tot F09 F12 Tot Female 5,494 8,014 13,508 3,499 5,198 8,697 891 62.0% 984 62.7% 1,875 62.4% Male 3,293 5,021 8,314 2,090 2,967 5,057 546 38.0% 586 37.3% 1,132 37.6% Am Ind 38 67 105 24 49 73 5.3% 6.4% 11.4% Asian 1,878 2,259 4,137 1,334 1,690 3,024 323 22.5% 308 19.6% 631 20.9% Black 1,279 1,861 3,140 676 990 1,666 215 15.0% 277 17.6% 492 16.4% Hisp 2,352 4,743 7,095 1,474 2,981 4,453 325 22.6% 520 33.1% 845 28.1% Pac Isl 171 170 341 119 109 228 40 2.8% 29 1.8% 69 2.3% Two + 533 783 1,316 348 536 884 97 6.9% 108 6.9% 205 6.9% White 1,521 1,692 3,213 1,079 1,282 2,361 206 14.3% 196 12.5% 402 13.4% Int l 692 1,225 1,917 295 354 649 111 7.7% 103 6.6% 214 7.1% Unknown 325 248 573 240 180 422 115 7.8% 23 1.4% 138 4.5% Total 8,789 13,048 21,837 5,589 8,171 13,760 1,437 100% 1,570 100% 3,007 100% (Not mutually-exclusive categories) Table 2: Students by Admission Stage - Gender and Race/Ethnicity - Fall 2009, Fall 2012 Table 2 shows: The proportion of Male to Female students has remained about the same Racial/Ethnic group proportions have shifted, with greater numbers of Hispanic/Latino (+10.5%) and Black students (+2.6%), and fewer Asian (-2.9%) and White (-1.8%) students 3

1.3 Funnel Statistics by Race/Ethnicity Nbr Applicants Adm/App Yield Rate Nbr Admitted Nbr Enrolled Enr/Adm Yield Rate Figure 1: Key to Funnel Graphics Stanford UC Berkeley San Jose State San Francisco State CSU East Bay 7.1% 21.4% 56.6% 61.5% 62.6% 34,348 50,374 22,999 29,935 13,047 2,437 10,795 13,011 18,401 8,171 1,707 4,109 2,761 3,659 1,570 70% 38% 21% 20% 19% Figure 2: Fall 2011 First-Time Degree-Seeking Undergraduate Admissions Statistics [Sources: IPEDS Data Center, Pioneer Data Warehouse *F12 Admissions Data for CSUEB] As Figure 2 illustrates, greater selectivity is defined by a proportionately small Applicant to Admit Yield, and a proportionately large Admit to Enroll Yield. The overall shape representing high selectivity has a wide mouth, narrow waist, and straight stem. The converse is true for lower selectivity. 4

AmInd Unknown White Hisp Asian 39 25 5 67 49 6 64% 20% 73% 12% 325 240 115 248 182 23 74% 47% 73% 12% 1,524 1,081 208 1,692 1,282 196 71% 19% 76% 15% 2,352 1,474 325 4,743 2,979 520 63% 22% 63% 17% 1,878 1,334 323 2,259 1,690 308 71% 24% 75% 18% Fall 2009 Fall 2012 Admit Enroll Yield 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% Two+ PacIsl Black Intl Total 531 347 96 783 536 108 65% 27% 68% 20% 171 119 40 170 109 29 70% 33% 64% 26% 1,278 675 215 1,861 990 277 53% 31% 53% 27% 691 294 110 1,225 354 103 43% 37% 29% 29% 8,789 5,589 1,437 13,048 8,171 1,570 64% 25% 63% 19% Fall 2009 Fall 2012 Admit Enroll Yield 35% 30% 25% 20% Figure 3: First-Time Freshman Yield Statistics by Race/Ethnicity - Fall 2009 and Fall 2012 (Shaded by Admitted- Enrolled Yield) Looking at Figure 3, it can be observed: American Indian and White students are admitted at higher rates and enroll at lower rates Pacific Islander and Black students are admitted at lower rates, and enroll at higher rates NOTE: It is common for International students to apply multiple times in their efforts to enroll at CSUEB, which accounts for the unusually selective funnel profile 5

2 Final Admission Status and Yield by Academic Preparedness 2.1 Final Admission Status by High School GPA The density of students by high school GPA was plotted to examine the distributions of students based on their final admission status - Applicant, Admitted, or Enrolled. Fall 2009 and Fall 2012 have very similar profiles for each student type, but group sizes differ. Group statistics appear in Table 3. Admitted-Not-Enrolled students, on average, had higher GPAs than Enrolled students. Applied-Not-Admitted student appear to include two distinct groups: 1. under-prepared students (the majority) 2. very well-prepared students Better-prepared students were admitted in Fall 2012 versus Fall 2009, as evidenced by higher mean High School GPAs among Admitted students (t = 7.13***, df = 10,296) Enrolled Students in Fall 2009 and Fall 2012 were comparable on High School GPA and SAT. Applicant Admitted Enrolled Valid N Mean SD Valid N Mean SD Valid N Mean SD Fall 2009 High School GPA 2,750 2.74.78 3,947 3.15.60 1,366 3.12.48 Total SAT (1600) 2,380 893 184 3,740 975 169 1,264 922 157 Fall 2012 High School GPA 4,195 2.68.66 6,351 3.22.44 1,516 3.13.44 Total SAT (1600) 3,449 855 169 6,046 962 162 1,432 921 145 Table 3: High School GPA and SAT Score by Final Admission Status Count 400 200 0 400 200 Fall 2009 Fall 2012 Final Admissions Status App Adm Enr 0 2 3 4 High School GPA Figure 4: Stacked Histogram of High School GPA by Final Admission Status (bin size =.05) 6

2.2 Final Admission Status by SAT Score (1600) Average SAT score for Applicants-Not-Admitted is lower than Admitted-Not-Enrolled and Enrolled students Average SAT score for Admitted-Not-Enrolled is higher than Enrolled students Among Enrolled students, there was no difference in average SAT score (t =.09, df = 2,694) from Fall 2009 to Fall 2012 300 Count 200 100 0 300 200 100 Fall 2009 Fall 2012 SAT Score App Adm Enr 0 400 800 1200 1600 SAT Total Score (1600) Figure 5: Stacked Histogram of SAT Score (1600) by Final Admission Status (bin size = 10) 7

2.3 High School GPA 1 and SAT Score by CA Residency and Final Admission Status High School GPA and SAT Score do not show signs of a strong correlation (r =.376, n = 10,483, p =.000); Despite being statistically significant, only 14% of the variation in SAT Scores can be explained by High School GPA (R 2 =.137) Including all Final Admission Statuses for Fall 2012, the 95% confidence interval for predicting a student s SAT score based on a High School GPA of 3.5 spans 615 points - 668 to 1,283 (See Figure 8) The Office of Planning and Institutional Research has found evidence that High School GPA is a better indicator of student retention and success than SAT score 2, which makes High School GPA a preferred indicator App Adm Enr 4 Non Res Non Res Non Res HighSchoolGPA 3 2 1 4 3 Non Res Min Res Min Non Res Min Resident CSU Admissions Index Non Res Resident Non Res Min Res Min Non Res Min Resident CSU Admissions Index Non Res Resident Non Res Min Res Min Non Res Min Resident CSU Admissions Index Non Res Resident Fall 2009 Fall 2012 CA Residency Status CA Res Non Res 2 Res Min Res Min Res Min CSU Admissions Index CSU Admissions Index CSU Admissions Index 1 0 500 1000 1500 0 500 1000 1500 0 500 1000 1500 SAT1600Score Figure 6: High School GPA by SAT Score by Final Admission Status 1 Lines in Figure 6 reflect CSU Eligibility Index for CA Residents and Non-Residents 2 June 13, 2012 Ad Hoc Report: Summary of Retention by Admission Type and Remediation Status for First-time Freshmen, 2007 to 2011 Fall Cohorts. Copies available from the CSUEB Office of Planning and Institutional Research upon request. 8

Figure 7 shows the same data as Figure 6 all in the same space. Density for Enrolled students is indicated by concentric shapes, with the inner-most circle representing the highest density and progressively decreasing density out to the perimeter. The most dense area for Enrolled students is near the Admissions Index limit for High School GPA and SAT scores. Density Overlay for Enrolled Students Only (Inner Circle = Most Dense) 4 HighSchoolGPA Non Res Final Admissions Status Resident 3 App Adm Enr Non Res Min Res Min 2 CSU Admissions Index 0 500 1000 1500 SAT1600Score Figure 7: High School GPA by SAT Score by Final Admission Status - Fall 2009 and Fall 2012, All Final Admissions Statuses 9

A linear regression model was fitted to the relationship between High School GPA and SAT score for Fall 2012 First-Time Freshmen (Figure 8). The wide 95% confidence interval for predicting a single SAT score based on a student s High School GPA shows that the relationship is not strong. 4 HighSchoolGPA 3 2 n = 10,485 1 400 800 1200 1600 SAT1600Score Figure 8: Fall 2012 First-Time Freshmen High School GPA and SAT Score With Predicted SAT Score (Blue Line) & 95% Confidence Interval (Red Lines) at Each Level of High School GPA 10

2.4 Yield by High School GPA and SAT Score A moderate but observable decline in Admitted-Enrolled Yield can be observed as High School GPA and SAT score increase Admitted-Enrolled Yield drops below 20% for High School GPAs around 3.25, and for SAT scores around 980 High School GPA Composite SAT Percentile Range Cut Value Count App-Adm Adm-Enr Cut Value Count App-Adm Adm-Enr 0% - 4.9% > 0.00 721 1.66% 75.00% > 400 958 33.19% 28.93% 5% - 9.9% > 2.18 1080 12.13% 32.06% > 660 1028 45.82% 28.03% 10% - 14.9% > 2.40 925 28.11% 21.92% > 720 1029 54.52% 25.49% 15% - 19.9% > 2.51 1037 41.27% 25.00% > 760 690 57.97% 25.00% 20% - 24.9% > 2.60 1008 54.96% 23.29% > 780 1117 62.22% 28.63% 25% - 29.9% > 2.68 1050 63.90% 26.68% > 810 755 65.03% 28.11% 30% - 34.9% > 2.76 1051 70.98% 22.12% > 830 1236 67.64% 24.64% 35% - 39.9% > 2.83 1078 73.28% 28.10% > 860 812 70.20% 25.44% 40% - 44.9% > 2.90 990 73.43% 22.97% > 880 864 66.90% 24.05% 45% - 49.9% > 2.96 844 78.08% 25.49% > 900 857 73.05% 23.00% 50% - 54.9% > 3.03 1180 81.27% 20.96% > 920 861 72.24% 21.22% 55% - 59.9% > 3.10 954 82.39% 22.65% > 940 798 75.44% 22.43% 60% - 64.9% > 3.17 901 81.80% 24.69% > 960 1175 77.87% 23.17% 65% - 69.9% > 3.24 1084 81.09% 19.34% > 990 671 75.86% 18.86% 70% - 74.9% > 3.32 984 81.81% 23.23% > 1010 945 79.26% 18.83% 75% - 79.9% > 3.41 1014 81.66% 18.72% > 1040 885 76.05% 20.80% 80% - 84.9% > 3.50 992 82.26% 18.50% > 1070 988 76.11% 15.69% 85% - 89.9% > 3.62 948 78.90% 21.52% > 1110 898 82.41% 16.35% 90% - 94.9% > 3.76 1007 78.85% 17.25% > 1160 878 79.27% 13.22% 95% - 100% > 3.94 983 77.11% 12.93% > 1230 863 78.45% 10.49% Valid N = 19,831 Valid N = 18,308 Table 4: Yield Rate by High School GPA and SAT Score - Fall 2009 & Fall 2012 11

80% 60% Yield Rate 40% Yield Type Admits/ Applicants Enrolled/ Admits 20% 0% 0% >0 5% >2.18 10% >2.4 15% >2.51 20% >2.6 25% >2.68 30% >2.76 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% >2.83 >2.9 >2.96 >3.03 >3.1 >3.17 High School GPA Percentile 65% >3.24 70% >3.32 75% >3.41 80% >3.5 85% >3.62 90% >3.76 95% >3.94 Figure 9: Yield Rate by High School GPA Percentile - Fall 2009 & Fall 2012 80% 60% Yield Rate 40% Yield Type Admits/ Applicants Enrolled/ Admits 20% 0% 0% >400 5% >660 10% >720 15% >760 20% >780 25% >810 30% >830 35% >860 40% >880 45% >900 50% >920 55% >940 SAT Percentile 60% >960 65% >990 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% >1010 >1040 >1070 >1110 >1160 >1230 Figure 10: Yield Rate by SAT Percentile - Fall 2009 & Fall 2012 12

3 Final Admission Status by Region 3 The highest yielding regions (Applicant/Admit) are: Applicant/Admit Yield 1. South Orange County 76.8% 2. Whittier and North Orange County 72.1% 3. Alameda County, Excl Oakland 71.8% 4. S San Diego County, Excl San Diego 71.3% 5. San Fernando Valley, West 70.8% Admit/Enroll Yield 1. Alameda County, Excl Oakland 34.1% 2. City of Oakland 28.9% 3. Out of State 27.3% 4. Contra Costa County 25.8% 5. South Bay 24.1% App/ Adm/ Adm Enr EPS Market Code App Adm Enr Yield Yield (CA01) Far Northern CA 265 184 23 69.4% 12.5% (CA02) Valley of the Moon 528 349 57 66.1% 16.3% (CA03) Sacramento Cnty 862 562 81 65.2% 14.4% (CA04) Marin Cnty 78 47 5 60.3% 10.6% (CA05) San Francisco Cnty 885 505 77 57.1% 15.2% (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 1708 1194 308 69.9% 25.8% (CA07) City of Oakland 1367 790 228 57.8% 28.9% (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 4124 2960 1010 71.8% 34.1% (CA09) San Mateo Cnty 708 468 98 66.1% 20.9% (CA10) City of San Jose 917 592 87 64.6% 14.7% (CA11) Santa Clara Cnty excl San Jose 516 345 44 66.9% 12.8% (CA12) Central Coast 425 285 43 67.1% 15.1% (CA13) Santa Barbara and W Ventura Cnty 178 123 15 69.1% 12.2% (CA14) San Fernando Valley (West) 318 225 21 70.8% 9.3% (CA15) San Fernando Valley (East) 88 49 3 55.7% 6.1% (CA16) Glendale and Pasadena 242 165 19 68.2% 11.5% (CA17) West LA and West Beach 219 137 18 62.6% 13.1% (CA18) Hollywood and Wilshire 505 257 50 50.9% 19.5% (CA19) East LA 300 192 25 64.0% 13.0% (CA20) South Bay 173 108 26 62.4% 24.1% (CA21) South and South Central LA 716 369 54 51.5% 14.6% (CA22) Long Beach 186 125 22 67.2% 17.6% (CA23) Covina and West Covina 326 211 28 64.7% 13.3% (CA24) Whittier and N Orange Cnty 129 93 11 72.1% 11.8% (CA25) Anaheim 173 105 21 60.7% 20.0% (CA26) Santa Ana 232 145 20 62.5% 13.8% (CA27) Riverside, San Bernardino, Ontario 724 472 74 65.2% 15.7% (CA28) S Orange Cnty 138 106 13 76.8% 12.3% (CA29) N San Diego Cnty excl SD 338 229 39 67.8% 17.0% (CA30) S San Diego Cnty excl SD 122 87 12 71.3% 13.8% (CA31) City of San Diego 177 107 11 60.5% 10.3% (CA32) Central Valley - North 1469 947 190 64.5% 20.1% (CA33) Central Valley - South 450 290 49 64.4% 16.9% (CA34) Greater Imperial Valley 304 194 22 63.8% 11.3% Out of State 1947 743 203 38.2% 27.3% Table 5: Yield Rates by EPS Market Region, F09 + F12 3 Disaggregated data provided to Admissions as a separate file. 13

(CA01) Far Northern CA (CA02) Valley of the Moon (CA03) Sacramento Cnty (CA04) Marin Cnty (CA05) San Francisco Cnty (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty (CA07) City of Oakland (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland (CA09) San Mateo Cnty (CA10) City of San Jose (CA11) Santa Clara Cnty excl San Jose (CA12) Central Coast (CA13) Santa Barbara and W Ventura Cnty (CA14) San Fernando Valley (West) (CA15) San Fernando Valley (East) (CA16) Glendale and Pasadena (CA17) West LA and West Beach (CA18) Hollywood and Wilshire (CA19) East LA AppAdmYield AdmEnrYield (CA20) South Bay (CA21) South and South Central LA (CA22) Long Beach (CA23) Covina and West Covina (CA24) Whittier and N Orange Cnty (CA25) Anaheim (CA26) Santa Ana (CA27) Riverside, San Bernardino, Ontario (CA28) S Orange Cnty (CA29) N San Diego Cnty excl SD (CA30) S San Diego Cnty excl SD (CA31) City of San Diego (CA32) Central Valley North (CA33) Central Valley South (CA34) Greater Imperial Valley Out of State 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Yield Rate Figure 11: Applicants, Admitted, and Enrolled Students by EPS Market Region (F09 + F12 Combined) 14

3.1 Geographic Density Applied-Not-Admitted Students Innermost Shape = Highest Density Figure 12: Geographic Density Applied-Not-Admitted Students by High School Location - F09 & F12 15

3.2 Geographic Density of Admitted-Not-Enrolled Students Innermost Shape = Highest Density Figure 13: Geographic Density of Admitted-Not-Enrolled Students by High School Location - F09 & F12 16

3.3 Geographic Density of Enrolled Students Innermost Shape = Highest Density Figure 14: Geographic Density of Enrolled Students by High School Location - F09 & F12 17

3.4 Geographic Density of Students by Originating High School - All Final Admission Statuses Figure 15: Geographic Density of Students by High School Location - All Final Admission Statuses - F09 & F12 18

4 High Schools 4.1 Top 45 High Schools by Final Admission Status Enrolled Admitted Applicant Rank High School Count High School Count High School Count 1 James Logan High 114 James Logan High 282 James Logan High 387 2 Tennyson High 78 Castro Valley High 191 San Leandro High 265 3 Castro Valley High 70 San Leandro High 189 Castro Valley High 240 4 Arroyo High 64 Arroyo High 161 Oakland Senior High 200 5 San Leandro High 62 Mt. Eden High 151 Mt. Eden High 193 6 Mt. Eden High 60 Moreau Catholic High 136 Arroyo High 193 7 Newark Memorial High 54 American High 134 American High 189 8 Hayward High 50 Newark Memorial High 129 Berkeley High 181 9 Oakland Senior High 43 Tennyson High 127 Tennyson High 175 10 American High 42 Oakland Senior High 122 Moreau Catholic High 175 11 San Lorenzo High 40 Berkeley High 102 Newark Memorial High 170 12 Moreau Catholic High 37 Irvington High 100 San Lorenzo High 153 13 Leadership P.S. - Hayward 29 San Lorenzo High 98 Hayward High 137 14 Washington High 27 Mission San Jose High 93 Oakland Tech Senior High 135 15 Skyline Senior High 27 John F. Kennedy High 92 Skyline Senior High 135 16 Irvington High 26 Hayward High 92 Irvington High 127 17 John F. Kennedy High 25 Independence High 87 Mission San Jose High 126 18 Merrill F. West High 23 Alameda High 81 John F. Kennedy High 124 19 Pittsburg Senior High 21 Dublin High 78 Alameda High 120 20 Dublin High 21 Washington High 77 Independence High 117 21 Oakland Tech Senior High 20 California High 76 Washington High 110 22 Deer Valley High 19 Oakland Tech Senior High 74 Dublin High 107 23 California High 19 Skyline Senior High 69 Milpitas High 104 24 Berkeley High 19 Merrill F. West High 69 Senior Middle School 97 25 St. Joseph Notre Dame High 18 Amador Valley High 68 California High 96 26 Concord High 18 Granada High 67 Merrill F. West High 95 27 Livermore High 16 Milpitas High 65 Deer Valley High 94 28 Independence High 16 Pittsburg Senior High 63 Luther Burbank High 93 29 Senior Middle School 14 Deer Valley High 62 Amador Valley High 90 30 Alameda High 14 Foothill High 60 Granada High 86 31 Antioch High 14 Luther Burbank High 58 Pittsburg Senior High 86 32 Clayton Valley High 14 Bishop O Dowd HS 56 Foothill High 85 33 Oakland Mil Inst CP Acad 14 Pinole Valley High 53 Bishop O Dowd HS 82 34 Mt. Pleasant High 14 Aspire L.W. CP Acad 53 Abraham Lincoln High 80 35 Monte Vista High 13 St. Joseph Notre Dame High 49 Pinole Valley High 79 36 Dozier-Libbey Medical High 13 Monte Vista High 47 Mission High 71 37 Hercules High 13 Sacred Heart Cathedral Prep 46 Encinal High 69 38 Granada High 13 Leadership P.S. - Hayward 46 Aspire L. W. CP Acad 69 39 Amador Valley High 13 Salesian High 45 Richmond High 69 40 Bishop O Dowd High School 13 Abraham Lincoln High 44 King/Drew Medical HS 67 41 Milpitas High 13 Tracy High 44 George Washington High 65 42 Mission San Jose High 12 Grant Union High 43 El Cerrito Senior High 65 43 Weston Ranch High 12 Richmond High 42 Leadership P.S. - Hayward 65 44 Tracy High 12 Clayton Valley High 41 Sacred Heart Cathedral Prep 64 45 Aragon High 11 Concord High 41 Downtown College Prep 64 Table 6: Top 45 High Schools For Each Final Admission Status 19

4.2 High Schools by Final Admission Status, Average and SAT Score, and Yield Rates See Supplemental File for Detailed List 20

4.3 Top High Schools for STEM, Non-STEM Enrolling Students App- Adm- App- Adm Enr Enr High School EPS Region App Adm Enr Yield Yield Yield James Logan High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 387 282 114 73% 40% 29% Tennyson High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 175 127 78 73% 61% 45% Castro Valley High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 240 191 70 80% 37% 29% Arroyo High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 193 161 64 83% 40% 33% San Leandro High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 265 189 62 71% 33% 23% Mt. Eden High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 194 152 61 78% 40% 31% Newark Memorial High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 170 129 54 76% 42% 32% Hayward High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 137 92 50 67% 54% 36% Oakland Senior High (CA07) City of Oakland 201 122 43 61% 35% 21% American High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 189 134 42 71% 31% 22% San Lorenzo High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 153 98 40 64% 41% 26% Moreau Catholic High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 175 136 37 78% 27% 21% Leadership Pub Sch-Hayward (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 65 46 29 71% 63% 45% Irvington High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 129 102 28 79% 27% 22% Washington High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 110 77 27 70% 35% 25% Skyline Senior High (CA07) City of Oakland 135 69 27 51% 39% 20% John F. Kennedy High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 124 92 25 74% 27% 20% Merrill F. West High (CA32) Central Valley - North 95 69 23 73% 33% 24% Pittsburg Senior High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 86 63 21 73% 33% 24% Dublin High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 107 78 21 73% 27% 20% Oakland Tech Senior High (CA07) City of Oakland 135 74 20 55% 27% 15% Deer Valley High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 94 62 19 66% 31% 20% California High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 96 76 19 79% 25% 20% Berkeley High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 181 102 19 56% 19% 10% St. Joseph Notre Dame High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 61 49 18 80% 37% 30% Concord High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 57 41 18 72% 44% 32% Livermore High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 45 33 16 73% 48% 36% Independence High (CA10) City of San Jose 117 87 16 74% 18% 14% Senior Middle School (NA) Out of State 97 17 14 18% 82% 14% Alameda High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 120 81 14 68% 17% 12% Antioch High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 57 40 14 70% 35% 25% Clayton Valley High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 53 41 14 77% 34% 26% Oakland Mil Inst CP Acad (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 47 34 14 72% 41% 30% Mt. Pleasant High (CA10) City of San Jose 64 41 14 64% 34% 22% Monte Vista High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 59 47 13 80% 28% 22% Dozier-Libbey Medical High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 36 30 13 83% 43% 36% Hercules High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 60 40 13 67% 33% 22% Granada High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 86 67 13 78% 19% 15% Amador Valley High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 90 68 13 76% 19% 14% Bishop O Dowd High School (CA07) City of Oakland 82 56 13 68% 23% 16% Milpitas High (CA11) Santa Clara Cnty excl San Jose 104 65 13 63% 20% 13% Mission San Jose High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 126 93 12 74% 13% 10% Weston Ranch High (CA32) Central Valley - North 49 32 12 65% 38% 24% Tracy High (CA32) Central Valley - North 63 44 12 70% 27% 19% Aragon High (CA09) San Mateo Cnty 40 34 11 85% 32% 28% Table 7: Top Non-STEM-Enrolling High Schools - F09 & F12 21

App- Adm- App- Adm Enr Enr High School Region Code App Adm Enr Yield Yield Yield Tennyson High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 47 40 22 85% 55% 47% James Logan High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 93 68 20 73% 29% 22% Mt. Eden High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 56 42 16 75% 38% 29% Newark Memorial High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 49 39 16 80% 41% 33% Castro Valley High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 48 38 15 79% 39% 31% San Leandro High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 62 39 15 63% 38% 24% Leadership Pub Sch - Hayward (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 22 16 13 73% 81% 59% Arroyo High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 45 34 10 76% 29% 22% John F. Kennedy High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 43 36 9 84% 25% 21% San Lorenzo High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 39 26 9 67% 35% 23% Hayward High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 23 16 8 70% 50% 35% Oakland Senior High (CA07) City of Oakland 39 22 8 56% 36% 21% Moreau Catholic High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 44 34 7 77% 21% 16% American High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 62 43 6 69% 14% 10% Washington High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 32 24 6 75% 25% 19% Independence High (CA10) City of San Jose 42 28 6 67% 21% 14% Irvington High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 28 21 5 75% 24% 18% FAME Public Charter School (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 12 8 5 67% 63% 42% Dublin High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 24 17 5 71% 29% 21% Bishop O Dowd High School (CA07) City of Oakland 14 11 5 79% 45% 36% New Millennium Secondary (CA22) Long Beach 7 6 4 86% 67% 57% Deer Valley High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 24 15 4 63% 27% 17% Dozier-Libbey Medical High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 11 9 4 82% 44% 36% Impact Acad of Arts & Tech (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 17 14 4 82% 29% 24% Pittsburg Senior High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 15 10 4 67% 40% 27% California High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 16 13 4 81% 31% 25% Aspire L.W. CP Academy (CA07) City of Oakland 23 17 4 74% 24% 17% Berkeley High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 32 16 4 50% 25% 13% Mt. Pleasant High (CA10) City of San Jose 16 12 4 75% 33% 25% Senior Middle School (NA) Out of State 16 3 3 19% 100% 19% Marc & Eva Stern Math & Sci (CA19) East LA 11 10 3 91% 30% 27% University Preparatory (CA27) Riverside, San Bern., Ontario 6 5 3 83% 60% 50% Lemoore High (CA33) Central Valley - South 5 4 3 80% 75% 60% East Palo Alto High School (CA09) San Mateo Cnty 14 6 3 43% 50% 21% Menlo-Atherton High (CA09) San Mateo Cnty 15 9 3 60% 33% 20% El Camino High (CA09) San Mateo Cnty 15 13 3 87% 23% 20% Hillsdale High (CA09) San Mateo Cnty 10 7 3 70% 43% 30% Alameda High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 31 21 3 68% 14% 10% Monte Vista High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 12 11 3 92% 27% 25% Livermore High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 12 10 3 83% 30% 25% Granada High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland 22 16 3 73% 19% 14% Freedom High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty 17 13 3 76% 23% 18% Jesse M. Bethel High (CA02) Valley of the Moon 15 11 3 73% 27% 20% Oakland Unified (CA07) City of Oakland 6 4 3 67% 75% 50% Oakland Tech Senior High (CA07) City of Oakland 26 15 3 58% 20% 12% Table 8: Top STEM-Enrolling High Schools - F09 & F12 22

4.4 Yield by Major Interest, STEM and Non-STEM App- Adm- Adm Enr Major Applicants Admits Enrolled Yield Yield Non-STEM Anthropology BA 128 76 15 59.4% 19.7% Art BA 869 530 119 61.0% 22.5% Business Admin BS 1395 850 242 60.9% 28.5% Communication BA 631 411 95 65.1% 23.1% Construction Management BS 35 20 5 57.1% 25.0% Criminal Justice Admin BS 1109 619 148 55.8% 23.9% Economics BA 165 88 19 53.3% 21.6% English BA 339 229 35 67.6% 15.3% Environmental Studies BA 68 49 9 72.1% 18.4% Ethnic Studies BA 63 32 7 50.8% 21.9% French BA 10 6 1 60.0% 16.7% Geography BA 7 5 1 71.4% 20.0% Geography BS 4 2 0 50.0% 0.0% History BA 221 139 25 62.9% 18.0% Hospitality and Tourism BS 85 47 6 55.3% 12.8% Human Development BA 282 171 34 60.6% 19.9% Interdisciplinary Studies BA 2 2 0 100.0% 0.0% Interdisciplinary Studies BS 1 1 0 100.0% 0.0% International Studies BA 125 83 13 66.4% 15.7% Kinesiology BS 933 611 143 65.5% 23.4% Latin American Studies BA 9 6 0 66.7% 0.0% Liberal Studies BA 337 214 43 63.5% 20.1% Music BA 245 143 30 58.4% 21.0% Nursing BS 1 0 0 0.0% 0.0% Philosophy BA 75 50 11 66.7% 22.0% Political Science BA 442 309 49 69.9% 15.9% Pre-Business Admin Program 1641 975 174 59.4% 17.8% Pre-Nursing Program 2626 1747 519 66.5% 29.7% Psychology BA 1202 756 163 62.9% 21.6% Psychology BS 418 271 64 64.8% 23.6% Recreation BS 27 14 5 51.9% 35.7% Sociology BA 469 281 52 59.9% 18.5% Spanish BA 59 38 5 64.4% 13.2% Speech Path & Audiology BS 83 60 15 72.3% 25.0% Theatre Arts BA 277 155 29 56.0% 18.7% Undeclared 2785 1756 334 63.1% 19.0% Unknown Major 6 3 0 50.0% 0.0% Table 9: Yield by Non-STEM Major Interest - F09 & F12 23

Major Applicants Admits Enrolled App-Adm Yield Adm-Enr Yield STEM Biochemistry BA 54 34 10 63.0% 29.4% Biochemistry BS 271 194 28 71.6% 14.4% Biological Science BA 199 130 26 65.3% 20.0% Biological Science BS 1536 1035 183 67.4% 17.7% Chemistry BA 42 27 9 64.3% 33.3% Chemistry BS 226 147 33 65.0% 22.4% Computer Engineering BS 25 22 11 88.0% 50.0% Computer Science BS 661 427 94 64.6% 22.0% Engineering BS 741 427 84 57.6% 19.7% Environmental Science BS 121 87 8 71.9% 9.2% Geology BA 5 1 0 20.0% 0.0% Geology BS 17 9 1 52.9% 11.1% Health Sciences BS 535 324 81 60.6% 25.0% Industrial Engineering BS 13 8 5 61.5% 62.5% Mathematics BS 165 108 22 65.5% 20.4% Physics BA 15 8 1 53.3% 12.5% Physics BS 48 31 4 64.6% 12.9% Statistics BS 8 3 2 37.5% 66.7% Table 10: Yield by STEM Major Interest - F09 & F12 24