Serving Healthy School Meals

Similar documents
Wellness Committee Action Plan. Developed in compliance with the Child Nutrition and Women, Infant and Child (WIC) Reauthorization Act of 2004

Cooking Matters at the Store Evaluation: Executive Summary

TABLE OF CONTENTS 6000 SERIES

There is a standards-based nutrition curriculum, health education curriculum, or other curriculum that includes nutrition.

DIRECT CERTIFICATION AND THE COMMUNITY ELIGIBILITY PROVISION (CEP) HOW DO THEY WORK?

Process Evaluations for a Multisite Nutrition Education Program

Healthier US School Challenge : Smarter Lunchrooms

Pima County, Arizona

Special Diets and Food Allergies. Meals for Students With 3.1 Disabilities and/or Special Dietary Needs

Assessment: 7308 Basic Culinary Arts 7309 Advanced Culinary

Smarter Lunchrooms: A Policy, Systems & Environmental Approach to School Meals May 2017 Katie Bark, Project Director Montana Team Nutrition, MSU

School Health Survey, Texas Education Agency

Organization Profile

School Health Survey, Texas Education Agency

Madera Unified School District. Wellness Policy Update

Global School-based Student Health Survey. UNRWA Global School based Student Health Survey (GSHS)

Guidelines for drafting the participant observation report

Technical Advising Professionals (TAPs) Quarterly Webinar

Smarter Lunchrooms- Part 2 Kathryn Hoy, MFN, RD, CDN Manager, Cornell Center for Behavioral Economics in Child Nutrition Programs

Rural Education in Oregon

Wright Middle School. School Supplement to the District Policy Guide

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

A Whole School Approach: Collaborative Development of School Health Policies, Processes, and Practices

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

Nutrition 10 Contemporary Nutrition WINTER 2016

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE (H SCI)

Braxton County Schools Smarter Lunchrooms Eat. Smart. & Healthy

Quantitative Research Questionnaire

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE (AGLS)

PUBLIC SCHOOL OPEN ENROLLMENT POLICY FOR INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL DISTRICT

Nutrition Assistance Program Report Series Office of Policy Support

Common Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success

Conditions for Healthy Food in German Universities. Sigrid Michel

Outside-of-school time obesity prevention and treatment interventions in African American youth

Study Abroad: Planning and Development, Successes and Challenges

Financing Education In Minnesota

Trends & Issues Report

Risk factors in an ageing population: Evidence from SAGE

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

Estimating the Cost of Meeting Student Performance Standards in the St. Louis Public Schools

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

Data-driven goal setting utilizing methods recommended by the State Department of Education.

Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School

McDonald's Corporation

THE VIRTUAL WELDING REVOLUTION HAS ARRIVED... AND IT S ON THE MOVE!

Building Extension s Public Value

Executive Guide to Simulation for Health

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Empowering through Taste and Food Education: The Impact of a Schoolbased Intervention on Students Food Preferences

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Northwest Region Touchpoint

Self-archived version. Citation:

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

J320 Brand Appraisal. by Chase McElhaney

Heart to Start Red Kit

ODESSA COLLEGE TECHNICAL STUDIES & CURRICULUM DIVISION CULINARY ARTS DEPARTMENT. 201 West University Odessa, Texas COURSE SYLLABUS

EXPERIENCE UGA Outstanding Process Improvement: Increase Service to Students

POLICE COMMISSIONER. New Rochelle, NY

The Rise of Results-Based Financing in Education 2015

School Physical Activity Policy Assessment (S-PAPA)

Action Work Plan for School Year Mercer County Schools Wellness Plan. County Sponsor: Amanda Aliff

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

i didnt do my homework poem

MARKETING FOR THE BOP WORKSHOP

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

Peterborough Eco Framework

Northeastern University Online Course Syllabus

HARLOW COLLEGE FURTHER EDUCATION CORPORATION RESOURCES COMMITTEE. Minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 12 May 2016

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

ODESSA COLLEGE CULINARY ARTS. 201 West University Odessa, Texas COURSE SYLLABUS

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

Table of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.

REGULATION RESPECTING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT AND SPECIALIST'S CERTIFICATES BY THE COLLÈGE DES MÉDECINS DU QUÉBEC

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Gehlen Catholic School & Gehlen Catholic Schools Endowment Fund. Romans 12: Capital Campaign

ODESSA COLLEGE TECHNICAL STUDIES & CURRICULUM DIVISION CULINARY ARTS DEPARTMENT. 201 West University Odessa, Texas COURSE SYLLABUS

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Alex Robinson Financial Aid

Comprehensive Program Review (CPR)

COURSE TITLE: FOOD & BEVERAGE OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT COURSE CODE: HP FB OM DESCRIPTION

Pathways to Health Professions of the Future

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

WIC Contract Spillover Effects

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

Draft Budget : Higher Education

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Competency-Based Learning Series: Seminar #3 Habits of Work Slides

Resume. Christine Ann Loucks Telephone: (208) (work)

Transcription:

An issue brief from The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation March 2014 Serving Healthy School Meals Missouri Schools Need Updated Equipment and Infrastructure Missouri at a glance 89 percent of school districts in Missouri, compared with 86 percent nationwide, are successfully serving healthy meals that meet strong nutrition standards. However, this often requires schools to work around equipment and infrastructure challenges in ways that are expensive, inefficient, and unsustainable. 86 percent of school districts in Missouri, compared with 88 percent nationwide, need at least one piece of equipment to better serve nutritious foods. 33 percent of school districts in Missouri have at least some budget for kitchen equipment upgrades. Model approaches for financing these improvements are outlined in Serving Healthy School Meals: Financing strategies for school food service. 51 percent of the districts in Missouri, compared with 55 percent nationwide, need kitchen infrastructure changes in at least one school. School foods play an important role in children s diets. On average, more than 30 million children participate in the National School Lunch Program daily, with more than 70 percent qualifying for free or reduced-price meals based on family household income. 1 At the same time, one-third of the children in the United States are overweight or obese, putting them at increased risk for heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, and other chronic diseases. 2 Because many children consume up to half of their daily calories at school, the foods served there have a significant impact on the health and well-being of students across the country. Given the concerns about children s health, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or USDA, has issued updated school meal nutrition standards that call for increasing servings of fruit, vegetables, low-fat dairy products, and whole grains while limiting fat, sugar, salt, and excess calories. Schools across the country are stepping up to the plate. A collaboration of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts

Nationwide, 86 percent of school districts are successfully serving healthy meals, and in Missouri, 89 percent of schools are serving such meals, according to USDA. 3 Meeting the updated standards qualifies school districts for increased reimbursement from USDA. Many, however, lack the right tools for preparing these meals and are therefore relying on workarounds that are expensive, inefficient, and unsustainable. To assess these needs in each state and the District of Columbia, the Kids Safe and Healthful Foods Project a collaboration of The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation commissioned a survey of the school food authorities, or SFAs, that administer the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program. Results of the survey provided insights into how schools are complying with the updated USDA meal standards and the challenges they must overcome to reach full implementation.* According to the survey, most school districts in the United States (88 percent) need at least one piece of kitchen equipment, and more than half (55 percent) need some infrastructure update to serve healthier school meals. To better understand this need and potential solutions, the project convened a meeting of stakeholders from schools, industry, government, and the private sector to brainstorm about ways that schools can finance equipment and infrastructure upgrades. The model approaches developed, which include partnerships, sponsorship funding, and low-interest loans, are detailed in Serving Healthy School Meals: Financing strategies for school food service, the summary of proceedings from the workshop. 4 Table 1 Snapshot of Missouri School District Characteristics Across the country, school districts equipment and infrastructure needs vary based on factors such as a district s size, number of schools, and community type. Larger districts (those with more than 2,500 students), for example, were more likely to report needing walk-in refrigerators and freezers, while districts with fewer than 1,000 students were more likely to need software programs for menu planning and nutrient analysis. Missouri School district characteristics Missouri United States Student enrollment* (median per SFA) 421 1,017 Number of public schools* (median per SFA) 2 3 Location of most schools Urban/suburban 14% 38% Rural 82% 62% Students approved for free/reduced-price lunch* (mean per SFA) 58% 49% Food service management company used 22% 17% Central production facilities 2% 9% * Data from 2010-2011 SFA Verification Summary Report, Form FNS 742. Source: Kitchen Infrastructure and Training for Schools Survey, 2012 2014 The Pew Charitable Trusts * The information presented is part of the Serving Healthy School Meals series of reports. The first report summarized districts readiness to meet updated nutrition standards. The second report addressed national school food service equipment and infrastructure needs. For more detailed state findings and to read earlier reports, visit healthyschoolfoodsnow.org. 2

Overview of Missouri kitchen equipment needs and costs Eighty-six percent of the state s school districts needed at least one piece of equipment. The median cost of this equipment is $12,000, compared with approximately $37,000 nationally. Overall, $101.9 million worth of food service equipment is needed in Missouri to better serve healthy foods. Thirty-three percent of school districts in Missouri reported having budgets for kitchen equipment purchases. Of the districts with budgets, 38 percent expected the resources to be adequate. 48 percent of SFAs in Missouri were unsure whether they had a budget to purchase equipment. Figure 1 The Cost of Food Service Equipment Needed by Missouri Schools Missing 2 % No equipment needed 12 % 27 % <$5,000 >$100,000 13 % $50,001 to $100,000 16 % 15 % $5,000 to $25,000 15 % $25,001 to $50,000 Source: Kitchen Infrastructure and Training for Schools Survey, 2012 2014 The Pew Charitable Trusts 3

Top school kitchen equipment needs in Missouri When asked about their needs in relation to meeting nutrition standards, the majority of respondents said that serving a greater variety of fruits and vegetables presented the greatest equipment challenges. When asked what specific equipment they need to meet all of the nutrition standards, districts responded: 1. 38 percent: Software programs. This technology allows for efficient management of menus, budgets, and purchase orders. Cost to meet statewide need: $292,000. 2. 37 percent: Sets of knives with cutting boards. Without enough of the right knives, preparation takes more time and poses safety risks for food service staff. Cost to meet statewide need: $407,000. 3. 33 percent: Food processors. Without bulk processors, school cooks must cut and mix foods by hand or prepare recipes in smaller, less-efficient batches. Cost to meet statewide need: $1.1 million. 4. 33 percent: Salad or fruit/vegetable bar. These bars are used to serve a variety of produce. Cost to meet statewide need: $4.9 million. 5. 32 percent: Scales. Industrial scales weigh bulk ingredients. Without them, ingredients must be weighed in smaller batches a process that is time-consuming, inefficient, and potentially fraught with error. Cost to meet statewide need: $492,000. School kitchen infrastructure upgrades In addition to equipment upgrades, food service infrastructure capacity must be considered in the effort to effectively implement the nutritional standards. For example, new equipment such as walk-in refrigerators and freezers may require more physical space or improvements to electrical systems. SFAs in 51 percent of the districts in Missouri need kitchen infrastructure changes in at least one school to better serve healthy foods, with more physical space being the most commonly reported issue. Without adequate space, school districts are making do with less-efficient processes, such as scheduling daily deliveries of fresh produce, a more costly option. 4

Figure 2 Food Service Infrastructure Upgrades Needed in Missouri School Districts More physical space was the most commonly reported infrastructure issue 40 Percentage of SFAs 30 20 10 31 % 30 % 16 % 13 % 5 % 4 % 0 More physical space More electrical capacity More plumbing capacity More ventilation Remodeling* More natural gas Note: * Remodeling indicates that the facility needs updating to meet revised local health department codes. More natural gas refers to increased pressure or location of pipes. Source: Kitchen Infrastructure and Training for Schools Survey, 2012 2014 The Pew Charitable Trusts About the survey of SFAs The findings presented in this issue brief are based on a survey, conducted by Mathematica Policy Research, of school food service directors or their designees (those deemed to be most knowledgeable about the district s equipment, infrastructure, and training needs) from a nationally representative sample of public SFAs. In most cases (67 percent), respondents were food service or nutrition directors. Other respondents included food service, kitchen, or cafeteria managers (17 percent) and those who held other positions within the SFA (14 percent). The questionnaire was developed with assistance from a consultant who works with SFAs to implement the updated meal requirements. In addition, a panel of child nutrition and food service experts from across the country helped identify and frame the issues to be measured. The questionnaire covered topics focusing on the needs of SFAs relative to implementing the updated requirements for school lunches. 5

Recommendations Additional funds are needed to assist Missouri s school districts in upgrading their kitchen equipment and infrastructure to serve healthy meals that students will enjoy. In light of these findings, the project recommends: Recommendation 1: School officials and local policymakers should work collaboratively with parents, teachers, students, and funders to identify and implement innovative strategies for meeting equipment, infrastructure, and training needs. Recommendation 2: Federal, state, and local governments should make funds available to school districts for upgrading their kitchen equipment and infrastructure to ensure that they are able to efficiently and reliably serve healthy and appealing meals. Recommendation 3: Nonprofit and for-profit organizations interested in improving children s health, education, school infrastructure, and community wellness should assist schools in acquiring the necessary equipment. Schools in Missouri and across the country are doing what they can to serve healthy meals that meet the updated meal standards, but they need help. Investments in equipment and infrastructure upgrades would go a long way toward helping schools efficiently store, prepare, and serve healthy and appealing foods to students. Endnotes 1 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, National School Lunch Program: Participation and Lunches Served (Data as of March 7, 2014), accessed March 21, 2014, http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/slsummar.htm. 2 J.C. Han, D.A. Lawlor, and S.Y. Kimm, Childhood Obesity, Lancet 375, no. 9727 (2010): 1737 48; D.S. Freedman et al., Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Excess Adiposity Among Overweight Children and Adolescents: The Bogalusa Heart Study, Journal of Pediatrics 150, no. 1 (2007): 12 17; E. Whitlock et al., Screening and Interventions for Childhood Overweight: A Summary of Evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force, Pediatrics 116, no. 1 (2005): e125 44; E.R. Sutherland, Obesity and Asthma, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America 28, no. 3 (2008): 589 602; E.D. Taylor et al., Orthopedic Complications of Overweight in Children and Adolescents, Pediatrics 117, no. 6 (2006): 2167 74; W.H. Dietz, Health Consequences of Obesity in Youth: Childhood Predictors of Adult Disease, Pediatrics 101, suppl. 2 (1998): 518 25. 3 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Percent of School Food Authorities (SFA) certified for the performance based reimbursement by State (Data as of December 2013), accessed March 18, 2014, http://www.fns.usda.gov. 4 The Pew Charitable Trusts, Kids Safe and Healthful Foods Project, Serving Healthy School Meals: Financing strategies for school food service, (2013), http://www.healthyschoolfoodsnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/kites_proceedings.pdf. 1 2 3 Cover photos: 1-3. Ted Dryden Contact: Michelle Cardoso, associate, communications Email: mcardoso@pewtrusts.org Project website: healthyschoolfoodsnow.org The Kids Safe and Healthful Foods Project, a collaboration between The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, provides nonpartisan analysis and evidence-based recommendations to make sure that all foods and beverages sold in U.S. schools are safe and healthful.