Factors That Influence the Formation of the Communication Skills of Docents and Students at a Military Educational Institution Alens INDRIKSONS

Similar documents
ОТЕЧЕСТВЕННАЯ И ЗАРУБЕЖНАЯ ПЕДАГОГИКА

Organising ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education) survey in Finland

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

Differentiated teaching in primary school

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

WHY DID THEY STAY. Sense of Belonging and Social Networks in High Ability Students

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Scenario Design for Training Systems in Crisis Management: Training Resilience Capabilities

Multiple Intelligence Theory into College Sports Option Class in the Study To Class, for Example Table Tennis

Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series

ARH 390 Survey of Decorative Arts & Design: The Ancient World to Present Online, Sec. 01, 03 Credit Hours Summer 2017

The KAM project: Mathematics in vocational subjects*

Syllabus: Introduction to Philosophy

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Different Requirements Gathering Techniques and Issues. Javaria Mushtaq

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSIONS, CONTRIBUTIONS, AND FUTURE RESEARCH

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Mexico (CONAFE) Dialogue and Discover Model, from the Community Courses Program

Intensive Writing Class

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Teacher s competences for the use of web pages in teaching as a part of technical education teacher s ICT competences

Integrated Science Education in

Educational system gaps in Romania. Roberta Mihaela Stanef *, Alina Magdalena Manole

P. Belsis, C. Sgouropoulou, K. Sfikas, G. Pantziou, C. Skourlas, J. Varnas

Course Law Enforcement II. Unit I Careers in Law Enforcement

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

PROJECT RELEASE: Towards achieving Self REgulated LEArning as a core in teachers' In-SErvice training in Cyprus

Methodological Basics of Blended Learning in Teaching English for Academic Purposes to Engineering Students

CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION

An Introduction to the Minimalist Program

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Education in Armenia. Mher Melik-Baxshian I. INTRODUCTION

IMPLEMENTING THE EARLY YEARS LEARNING FRAMEWORK

Reviewed by Florina Erbeli

The Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical. Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University

Merbouh Zouaoui. Melouk Mohamed. Journal of Educational and Social Research MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy. 1. Introduction

UPPER SECONDARY CURRICULUM OPTIONS AND LABOR MARKET PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM A GRADUATES SURVEY IN GREECE

CRPD- General Comment on Article 24 (Right to Inclusive Education) Written statement

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

Communication around Interactive Tables

GERM 3040 GERMAN GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION SPRING 2017

Empirical research on implementation of full English teaching mode in the professional courses of the engineering doctoral students

Informatics 2A: Language Complexity and the. Inf2A: Chomsky Hierarchy

ESTABLISHING A TRAINING ACADEMY. Betsy Redfern MWH Americas, Inc. 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 200 Broomfield, CO

Development of the syllabi of courses for MA multilingual education program. Kyiv, th April, 2016

Strategy Study on Primary School English Game Teaching

- «Crede Experto:,,,». 2 (09) ( '36

10.2. Behavior models

The Model of Forming Communicative Competence of Students in the Process of Teaching the English Language

CRIJ 2328 Police Systems and Practices. Class Meeting Time:

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

SY 6200 Behavioral Assessment, Analysis, and Intervention Spring 2016, 3 Credits

Course and Examination Regulations

Disability Resource Center St. Philip's College ensures Access. YOU create Success. Frequently Asked Questions

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Effectiveness of Electronic Dictionary in College Students English Learning

Emma Kushtina ODL organisation system analysis. Szczecin University of Technology

Ontological spine, localization and multilingual access

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Seminar - Organic Computing

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol. XXIII No SIMULATION AND GAMIFICATION IN E-LEARNING TECHNICAL COURSES

STAFF DEVELOPMENT in SPECIAL EDUCATION

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Essentials of Human Communication

The Use of Concept Maps in the Physics Teacher Education 1

Ministry of Education General Administration for Private Education ELT Supervision

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom

A Grammar for Battle Management Language

Lecturing Module

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

eportfolios in Education - Learning Tools or Means of Assessment?

Textbook Evalyation:

Institutional repository policies: best practices for encouraging self-archiving

QUID 2017, pp , Special Issue N 1- ISSN: X, Medellín-Colombia

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) ON THE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAMME

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

5 Early years providers

Milton Public Schools Special Education Programs & Supports

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LODI

A MULTI-AGENT SYSTEM FOR A DISTANCE SUPPORT IN EDUCATIONAL ROBOTICS

POL EVALUATION PLAN. Created for Lucy Learned, Training Specialist Jet Blue Airways

Strategic Management and Business Policy Globalization, Innovation, and Sustainability Fourteenth Edition

Language Acquisition Chart

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REENGAGEMENT. April 25, 2016

A PEDAGOGY OF TEACHING THE TEST

DOCENT VOLUNTEER EDUCATOR APPLICATION Winter Application Deadline: April 15, 2013

Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Demmert/Klein Experiment: Additional Evidence from Germany

PROCESS USE CASES: USE CASES IDENTIFICATION

Analysis: Evaluation: Knowledge: Comprehension: Synthesis: Application:

E-LEARNING A CONTEMPORARY TERTIARY EDUCATION SOLUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALISATION

International Conference on Current Trends in ELT

Transcription:

2017 2nd International Conference on Advanced Education and Management Engineering (AEME 2017) ISBN: 978-1-60595-524-7 Factors That Influence the Formation of the Communication Skills of Docents and Students at a Military Educational Institution Alens INDRIKSONS Rezekne Academy of Technologies, Atbrīvošanas aleja 115, LV-4601, Rēzekne, Latvia Keywords: Barriers, Communication, Factors, Military institution, Promotion. Abstract. Docents and students at the military educational institution are officers with a special service rank, and their activity is regulated by the Law, which determines subordination and hierarchy and hence communication subject object, which is to be observed in service. The paper deals with the situations of communication in professional training process. Communication and studying process cannot be implemented without the interaction of docents and students. This determines a need for research promoting factors that influence the formation of the communication skills of docents and students. The objectives of the paper are to analyse the specific roles of a docent and a student and their interaction and to determine communication barriers and factors promoting communication in a specific environment of military educational institution. In order to explore the existing situation, questionnaires for the docents and students were created and factors that influence the formation of the communication skills of docents and students at a military educational institution were detected. The conducted survey creates a necessity for further research on the influence of communication barriers on the studying process at a military educational institution. Introduction Life in the knowledge society of the 21 st century requires educated and competent persons who are able to apply the existing knowledge and are ready for further development which includes the idea of improvement and progressive changes [1]. Pursuant to opinions of R. Powell & D. Powell [2], the learning process is related to student abilities, student motivation and classroom communication. Militarized educational institutions are specific by the fact that they are working on the basis of principle of one man management; therefore the communication is influenced and regulated by professional rules and regulations. The main specific nature of military educational institutions is expressed in the circumstance that the staff that implements the studying process and the staff acquiring it are in a service relationship. The main attention is paid to acquisition of knowledge and person s identity is not being developed. In contradistinction to vocational education institutions, teacher in militarized educational institution performs specific roles as a result of service relationship. The notion service is to be understood as relationships that are regulated by special normative acts; therefore the dominating type of the communication process at such educational institutions is communication subject object, which makes the formation of the communication skills of docents and students as well as the achievement of such learning aims as development of an all round personality of a student more difficult. The student at the military educational institution in the perception of docents is first of all a subordinate rather than a personality; where as the docent has the social role of a chief whose orders according to the requirements of normative acts are to be obligatory executed. This circumstance creates several specific communication barriers between docents and students in the studying process at military educational institution, thus making the development of a future border guard inspector s and commander s individuality and personality, including professional and communication skills, in the studying process difficult to achieve. This determines an objective need for research on factors that influence the formation of the communication skills of docents and students at a military educational institution with the aim to improve the communication and professional training process of the specialized (military) pedagogical process. In order to explore 207

the existing situation and the needs of students in the field of communication at a military educational institution with the aim to determine factors influencing the formation of the communication skills, questionnaires for the docents and students were created. Data were obtained and the results were summarized, analyzed and interpreted. Factors Influencing Formation of Communication at a Military Educational Institution Analysis of works of different authors [3,4,5] shows that the specific character of interrelationships and communication of the members involved in the education process is closely related to the leadership style employed at the institution: democratic or authoritarian. At a military educational institution, mainly traditional approach to education is applied, employing communication and relationship subject object between the docent and the student in the studying process, which is mainly implemented in the form of orders. But a system, where pedagogue only transfers information and the student receives it, could not be called as independent-personality developing [6]. Humane pedagogy is characterized by not only the content of the course but also the way of passing the new knowledge. Thus it can be implemented using communication and subject subject, based on dialogue in the process of interaction. Humane pedagogy and creation of a positive emotional environment in the auditorium at military educational institutions during the implementation of the aims of the studying process are limited due to the requirements of authoritarianism, existing hierarchy and special normative acts. But such militarized educational institution characterizing factors as subject object relationships, authoritarian style of leadership, discipline, monologue and orders build up a barrier between teaching staff and students and negative impact on all communication skills criteria for the formation and development of the communication in the study process [7]. EDUCATIONAL APPROACH Traditional LEADERSHIP STYLE Authoritarian TYPE OF RELATIONSHIP subject object COMMUNICATION Docent (commander, superior) Information orders regulations discipline Student (executor) Figure 1. Communication and interrelationship during the studying process at a military educational institution. In research the specific character of interrelationships of the participants involved in the studying process at a military educational institution, the leadership style employed at the institution and in 208

the studying process, and the pedagogical approach applied are analyzed in order to determine the possibility of integrating communication and relationship subject subject in the existing hierarchical environment of a military educational institution. Communication and interrelationship during the studying process at a military educational institution are shown in Figure 1. As a result of the analysis, it was found that humane pedagogy, creation of a positive emotional environment in the auditorium and democratic leadership style are not implemented at military educational institutions during the implementation of the aims of the studying process due to the specific hierarchy, the principle of autocracy and the requirements of special normative acts; nevertheless, it is possible to integrate communication and relationship subject subject in the specific environment of a military educational institution. This possibility is implemented by the subjects of the pedagogical process each in their specific function and by expressing attitudes in interpersonal communication: the readiness of the docent to integrate the relationship subject subject in the studying process and the ability of the student to cooperate. L. Dubkevičs [8] believes that the communication and the cooperation between docent and student in the educational institution are influenced by various factors: - physical environment (distance, location); - social environment (for example, social norms); - physiological factors and outward (for example, gender and clothing); - psychological factors (motives, prejudices, partner's attractiveness, etc.). Therefore in docent and student interaction process may arise communication barriers. Communication barriers are factors which interferes transmission and reception of information during communication process and reduce the efficiency of this process. R. Luise [9] defines following barriers: - personality barriers, which means the psychological incompatibility between the communication actors because of a different temperament, character, level of education, gender, listening to the world; - cultural barriers related to nationality, traditions, norms of behavior, religion or ethics for representatives of different countries; - physical barriers (noise, distance, emergency situation); - language barriers (insufficient vocabulary, inadequate speech style, foreign language); - semantic barrier due to the lack of necessary knowledge in the fields of professional terminology; - organizational barriers (arising from organizational structures and procedures). In militarizes educational institution may arise new or combined barriers, which follows from specificity of the organization of such institutions and the existing communication model. Table 1. Factors influencing formation of communication at a military educational institution. COMMUNICATION BARRIERS Hierarchical system with traditional educational approach and specific communication model Docent s role as a superior and commander Implementation of docents power Service relationship Physical environment Social environment FACTORS PROMOTING COMMUNICATION Creation of positive emotional environment with humane educational approach in the educational process and integration in the hierarchical system Docent s role as a lecturer and motivator Creation of the relationship of cooperation and interaction Physiological factors Uniform as an attribute of the docent s implementation Use of civil clothing during the studying process of power Psychological factors Docent s personality Docent s personality (unwillingness to communicate) (creates a desire to communicate) 209

Since communication and the studying process cannot be implemented without the interaction of docents and students, the specific character of formation of the communication skills, interaction of a student and a docent in the specific environment and communication barriers and promoting factors that influence the formation of the communication skills of docents and students at a military educational institution are determined. The conducted research on the course of the studying process and the analysis of the questionnaires for the docents and students at a military educational institution allowed summarizing and determining factors that influence communication in the specific environment of a military educational institution (see Table 1). Analysis of the research allowed find out factors influencing formation of docents and students communication and determining the possibilities of improving the communication in the studying process at a military educational institution. Complete integration of communication and relationship subject subject in military educational institution is impossible due to the requirements of the normative acts that regulate the course of the service career. In the implementation of the educational process, in the acquisition of general education courses, the traditional educational approach with communication and relationships subject object needs to be replaced with humane pedagogical approach with the democratic leadership style, creating communication and relationships subject subject during the studying process thus promoting formation of the communication skills. At a military educational institution it is necessary to encourage the docents desire to improve the quality of their pedagogical activity and develop the communication skills, as well as motivate the staff to acquire pedagogical education. In the studying process it is necessary to decrease communication barriers, thus promoting development of the communication skills in the specific environment of a military educational institution. Topics that will promote formation of the docents and students communication skills as well as ways and methods of learning them need to be developed and included in the courses conveyed at military educational institution. The conducted survey of docents and students on the existing situation in the field of communication at military educational institutions creates a necessity for further research on the influence of communication barriers on the studying process at a military educational institution, and on formation of the communication skills in the hierarchical system of a military educational institution. Summary The dominating communication type at a military educational institution is communication subject object, which manifests as the superiors giving orders. This type of communication has a significant drawback there is no feedback, which is a significant component of successful communication. Specific communication barriers exist at military educational institutions hierarchical system with a traditional educational approach and a specific communication model, the docent s role of a superior and commander, implementation of the docents power, service relationships, the docent s uniform and such personality of the docent that does not create a desire to communicate, which stem from the specific nature of work organization of such institutions. Since communication and the studying process cannot be implemented without the interaction of docents and students, it is necessary to define promoting factors that influence the formation of the communication skills of docents and students at a military educational institution. In research the following factors promoting communication were identified: creation of a positive emotional environment using the humane educational approach to the studying process and integration in the hierarchical system, the role of the docent lecturer as a motivator in the creation of a cooperative relationship and interaction, the use of civil clothing in the studying process and such personality of a docent that creates a desire to communicate. 210

References [1] S. Ušča, S., V. Ļubkina, Pusaudžu ar valodas traucējumiem komunikatīvās kompetences attīstība, Rēzekne, 2013. [2] R. Powell, D. Powell, Classroom Communication and Diversity, New- York, Taylor & Francis Group, 2010. [3] Information on http://profizgl.lu.lv/mod/book/view.php?id=23289&chapterid=7091 [4] V. Reņģe, Personības psiholoģija, Rīga, Zvaigzne ABC, 2000. [5] Information on http://infed.org/mobi/learning-theory-models-product-and-process/ [6] A. Indriksons, V. Ļubkina, S. Ušča, Komunikācijas procesu analīze Valsts robežsardzes koledžā, Proceedings of the Annual International Scientific Conference Society. Integration. Education, Rēzekne, 2014, 84-92. [7] A. Indriksons, Komunikācijas prasmes veidošanās likumsakarības robežsargu profesionālajā sagatavošanā. Proceedings of the Annual International Scientific Conference Society. Integration. Education, Rēzekne, 2016, 115-124,. [8] L. Dubkevičs, Saskarsme audzēkņiem, Rīga, Jumava, 2006. [9] P. Льюис, Деловые культуры в международном бизнесе. От столкновения к взаимопониманию. Пер. с англ. 2-е изд., Москва, Дело, 2001. 211