INSTITUTIONAL KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 90% 66% 65% 70% 60% 50% 1,200 1,190 1,180 88% 1,170 1,160 1,150 SAT 150, , ,000 90,000 70,000

Similar documents
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Best Colleges Main Survey

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

Scholarship Reporting

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

School of Medicine Finances, Funds Flows, and Fun Facts. Presentation for Research Wednesday June 11, 2014

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

University of Arizona

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

learning collegiate assessment]

Financing Education In Minnesota

LIM College New York, NY

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

Seminole State College Board Regents Regular Meeting

Swarthmore College Common Data Set

Texas A&M University-Texarkana

CHAPTER XI DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Validation Requirements and Error Codes for Submitting Common Completion Metrics

Financial Plan. Operating and Capital. May2010

BARUCH RANKINGS: *Named Standout Institution by the

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

2010 DAVID LAMB PHOTOGRAPHY RIT/NTID FINANCIAL AID AND SCHOLARSHIPS

Access Center Assessment Report

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

DRAFT VERSION 2, 02/24/12

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Financial Aid & Merit Scholarships Workshop

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Music Chapel House Rules and Policies hapelle Musicale Reine Elisabeth, fondation d'utilité publique

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Survey of Formal Education

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

Argosy University, Los Angeles MASTERS IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP - 20 Months School Performance Fact Sheet - Calendar Years 2014 & 2015

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

University of Massachusetts Amherst

Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FACT SHEET CALENDAR YEARS 2014 & TECHNOLOGIES - 45 Months. On Time Completion Rates (Graduation Rates)

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

Florida A&M University Graduate Policies and Procedures

Fiscal Years [Millions of Dollars] Provision Effective

A Diverse Student Body

A. General Information

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

National Survey on First-Year Seminars 2006

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

Paying for College. Marla Lewis Office of Student Financial Aid

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

University of Wyoming Dashboard

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

ABILITY SORTING AND THE IMPORTANCE OF COLLEGE QUALITY TO STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM COMMUNITY COLLEGES

PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE OFFICE OF STUDENT FINANCIAL AID GUIDELINES FOR THE EDWARD T. CONROY MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM

Purdue Data Summit Communication of Big Data Analytics. New SAT Predictive Validity Case Study

Leveraging MOOCs to bring entrepreneurship and innovation to everyone on campus

Consumer Information Boot Camp

Bethune-Cookman University

Finding Money for College

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Application for Fellowship Leave

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Communication Disorders Program. Strategic Plan January 2012 December 2016

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey Data Collection Webinar

LATTC Program Review Instructional -Department Level

Peru State College Peru, NE

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

Graduate Handbook Linguistics Program For Students Admitted Prior to Academic Year Academic year Last Revised March 16, 2015

Azusa Pacific University Azusa, CA

RESIDENCY POLICY. Council on Postsecondary Education State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations

TACOMA HOUSING AUTHORITY

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

The Relationship Between Poverty and Achievement in Maine Public Schools and a Path Forward

The Impact of Honors Programs on Undergraduate Academic Performance, Retention, and Graduation

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Little Rock, AR

What You Need to Know About Financial Aid

INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

Academic Advising Manual

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

LEN HIGHTOWER, Ph.D.

EVALUATION PLAN

Wright State University

6 Financial Aid Information

Transcription:

INSTITUTIONAL KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 4 year Graduation Rate 6 year Graduation Rate 7% 65% 6% 55% 5% 45% 48% 59% 64% 6% 6% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 66% 65% 7% 74% 75% 4% 22 23 24 25 26 4% 2 21 22 23 24 Freshman Cohort Definition: Graduation Rate Definition: Freshman Cohort 1% 1st to 2nd Retention Rate 1,2 SAT Combined Score (reading & math, regular admits only) 95% 9% 88% 9% 88% 87% 88% 1,19 1,18 1,17 1,176 1,163 1,165 85% 1,16 1,15 1,152 8% 25 26 27 28 29 1,15 1,14 26 27 28 29 21 Definition : Retention Rates 2 Student/Faculty Ratio 25 retention rates Class Size 19 18 to 1 18 to 1 18 to 1 18 to 1 24 23 23 23 23 18 17 to 1 23 22 17 22 16 21 15 26 27 28 29 21 2 26 27 28 29 21 Definition Student/Faculty Ratio SAT 13, 15, 11, 9, 7, 66,89 73,769 9,993 94,695 13,474 13, 11, 9, 7, 93,797 1,584 111,818 117,635 117,87 5, 5, Student/Faculty FY26 FY27 Ratio FY28 FY29 FY21 Revenue Detail by Category Expenditure Detail by Category Ramapo College of New Jersey Institutional Indicators Nov 21.xlsx 11/12/21 Effectiveness, Research and Planning

Graduation Rate Graduation rates are those developed to satisfy the requirements of the Student Right to Know and Higher Education Opportunity Acts. Graduation rate is defined as the total number of students from a cohort of full time, first time, degree/certificate seeking undergraduates who completed a degree or certificate within a given percent of normal time, divided by the entire cohort of full time, first time, degree/certificate seekingundergraduates minus any allowable exclusions. Institutions are permitted to exclude from the initial cohort students who died or were totally and permanently disabled; those who left school to serve in the armed forces or were called to active duty; those who left to serve with a foreign aid service of the federal government, such as the Peace Corps; and those who left on an official church mission.

Freshmen Cohort Full time, first time, degree/certificate seeking undergraduates who enter the institution for the first time in the fall semester.

Retention Rates Full time retention rates are defined as the number of full time, first time, degree/ certificate seeking undergraduate students who enter the institution for the first time in the fall and who return to the same institution the following fall, divided by the total number of full time, first time, degree/certificate seeking undergraduates in the fall of the first entrance.

Student/Faculty Ratio The guidance provided to institutions for calculating their student to faculty ratio is as follows: the number of FTE students divided by the total FTE instructional staff.

Revenue Categories DESCRIPTION OF DATA USED IN THE FIGURES Core Revenues Core revenues for public instituions reporting under GASB standards include tuition and fees; government appropriations (federal, state, and local); government grants and contracts; private gifts, grants and contracts; investment income; other operating and nonoperating sources; and other revenues and additions. 6, 5, 4, 32,342 35,735 4,81 43,883 47,891 3, 2, 9, 8,356 7, 5, 3,834 4,388 4,62 5,56 3, 1, 9, 7, 5, 3, 1, 7,274 7,756 5,13 5,277 5,576 Institutional Indicators Nov 21.xlsx 11/12/21 Page 1 of 2 Effectiveness, Research and Planning

Revenue Categories 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 34,785 35,588 3,829 27,75 24,858 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 5,687 1,64 999 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 42 619 2,52 4,396 2,243 Institutional Indicators Nov 21.xlsx 11/12/21 Page 2 of 2 Effectiveness, Research and Planning

Expenditure Categories DESCRIPTION OF DATA USED IN THE FIGURES Core Expenses Core expenses for public institutions using the GASB standards include expenses for instruction, research, public service, academic support, institutional support, student services, operation and maintenance of plant, depreciation, interest, scholarships and fellowships, other expenses and nonoperating expenses. 5, 4, 3, 28,675 32,123 36,654 38,68 39,952 2, 25 2 15 1 5 215 67 59 Institutional Indicators Nov 21.xlsx 11/12/21 Page 1 of 4 Effectiveness, Research and Planning

Expenditure Categories 6, 5,8 5,6 5,4 5,2 5, 5,84 5,62 5,564 5,525 5,364 12, 11, 1, 9,496 9,825 1,219 1,984 1,392 9, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 17,9 16,592 16,1 15,67 15,26 Institutional Indicators Nov 21.xlsx 11/12/21 Page 2 of 4 Effectiveness, Research and Planning

Expenditure Categories 1,5 1, 6 697 1,61 1,16 717 5 16, 12, 11,48 11,73 12,987 14,252 14,231 8, 4, 8 6 4 2 541 314 43 Institutional Indicators Nov 21.xlsx 11/12/21 Page 3 of 4 Effectiveness, Research and Planning

Expenditure Categories 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 11,335 11,52 1,61 8,879 9,564 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 18,52 18,597 17,25 14,475 15,355 Institutional Indicators Nov 21.xlsx 11/12/21 Page 4 of 4 Effectiveness, Research and Planning