Executive Summary Global Engagement and International Education

Similar documents
Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

Curricular Reviews: Harvard, Yale & Princeton. DUE Meeting

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

Department of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

The Mission of Teacher Education in a Center of Pedagogy Geared to the Mission of Schooling in a Democratic Society.

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

University of Toronto

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Geography MASTER OF SCIENCE MASTER OF APPLIED GEOGRAPHY. gradcollege.txstate.edu

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

University of Delaware Library STRATEGIC PLAN

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Appendix. Journal Title Times Peer Review Qualitative Referenced Authority* Quantitative Studies

Request for Proposal UNDERGRADUATE ARABIC FLAGSHIP PROGRAM

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Development and Innovation in Curriculum Design in Landscape Planning: Students as Agents of Change

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

CREATING SAFE AND INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS: A FRAMEWORK FOR SELF-ASSESSMENT. Created by: Great Lakes Equity Center

Student Experience Strategy

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

What Is a Chief Diversity Officer? By. Dr. Damon A. Williams & Dr. Katrina C. Wade-Golden

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

STRATEGIC GROWTH FROM THE BASE OF THE PYRAMID

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Professor Division of Agricultural Education College of Agriculture, Montana State University Bozeman, MT

GRAND CHALLENGES SCHOLARS PROGRAM

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

Syllabus Education Department Lincoln University EDU 311 Social Studies Methods

Michigan State University

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

EDUCATING TEACHERS FOR CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY: A MODEL FOR ALL TEACHERS

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Community Unit # 2 School District Library Policy Manual

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Department of Communication Promotion and Tenure Criteria Guidelines. Teaching

A Guide to Supporting Safe and Inclusive Campus Climates

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ACCESS AGREEMENT

INSPIRE A NEW GENERATION OF LIFELONG LEARNERS

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Thinking of standards from first year

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Sociology and Anthropology

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Chief Academic Officer s Guidelines For Preparing and Reviewing Promotion and Tenure Dossiers

e-learning Coordinator

PROMOTION and TENURE GUIDELINES. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Gordon Ford College of Business Western Kentucky University

Advancing the Discipline of Leadership Studies. What is an Academic Discipline?

PLAN 2020: Gateway to the Future. Enter Engage Excel

SOCRATES PROGRAMME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS

UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY DEPARTMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION POSTGRADUATE STUDIES INFORMATION GUIDE

Office for Institutional Diversity Report

Multicultural Education: Perspectives and Theory. Multicultural Education by Dr. Chiu, Mei-Wen

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

Ten years after the Bologna: Not Bologna has failed, but Berlin and Munich!

UNIVERSITY OF DERBY JOB DESCRIPTION. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. JOB NUMBER SALARY to per annum

Greek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs

EDUC 2020: FOUNDATIONS OF MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION Spring 2011

Impact of Digital India program on Public Library professionals. Manendra Kumar Singh

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LODI

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

February 1, Dear Members of the Brown Community,

CONTRACT TENURED FACULTY

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Infrastructure Issues Related to Theory of Computing Research. Faith Fich, University of Toronto

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Student Engagement and Cultures of Self-Discovery

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

Qualification Guidance

Loyalist College Applied Degree Proposal. Name of Institution: Loyalist College of Applied Arts and Technology

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Transcription:

Executive Summary Global Engagement and International Education Introduction The forces of globalization continue to create new needs and new opportunities for cross boundary collaboration. These dynamics will require RIT to expand the scope and relevance of its academic programs and research to include emerging global, social, technological, environmental, ecological and cultural issues RIT will soon join the ranks of other more established and mature research institutions in the nation. In order to be distinguished in this category, RIT must have clear strategies to differentiate itself. Over time, creating a unique ecosystem for experiencing and learning in a multicultural, cross boundary, international, interdisciplinary environment could very well be the differentiator for RIT. Historically, RIT has successfully demonstrated the capacity to differentiate itself by effectively developing a portfolio of Arts, Science, NTID, Business and other areas of study in a 'career oriented' educational institution. Now it should build on this legacy and reinvent itself as a more effective 'global solution oriented' experiential educational institution. Dimension Statement RIT students, faculty and staff will be internationally recognized for their global knowledge, intercultural competencies, and their engagement with globally relevant problems. Our multicultural community and global presence enhances our academic programs, expands our international reputation, and enriches the professional development and lifelong learning of our students. The Goals Goal 1: 100% of RIT students will: A. Develop global knowledge and intercultural competencies through course work and experiences grounded in the general education curriculum. B. Develop global knowledge and intercultural competencies through course work and experiences in their chosen field of study. C. Have an opportunity to participate in an international education experience focusing on global issues and cultural differences in discipline specific problem solving. Goal 2: RIT will build on its core strengths and work with international partners to co-create a select group of distinctive academic programs focusing on global professional practice and international expertise. Goal 3: Establish international research partnerships, and select academic programs, in emerging international centers of excellence in order to materially enhance RIT s international reputation and enable innovative ways of educating international students. Goal 4: RIT will be an integrated global community of students, alumni, faculty and staff who, through their diversity and personal cultural perspectives, enrich the university culture and common educational experience of all RIT students.

Summary of Key Strategies The taskforce recommended a number of strategies to assure we realize our goals. We believe the following are key: 1. Establish an interdisciplinary Center for International and Global Studies as a focal point for collaboration and the development of international, multicultural and global curricula and programs. 2. Support faculty with the required pedagogical and financial resources necessary to convert and develop courses to meet the Global Interconnectedness Essential Program Outcome and the strategic goals for international education. 3. Restructure and transform study abroad into RIT Global Experiential Learning with a focused commitment to developing a new model of international experiential education. This new model will place emphasis on RIT faculty-led experiences and developing models that integrate project-intensive international and intercultural experiences with work and research. 4. Fully resource and expand our language and culture programs and course offerings. 5. Develop a transparent process by which new international sites can be proposed, assessed and implemented. Group Consensus and Resource Questions The Strategic Planning Taskforce benefitted from the work of the Academic Senate s Global Education Taskforce. The Academic Senate group had worked for approximately 4 months prior to the creation of the taskforce to develop three of the goals in our current submission. As a result, many of the issues associated with the goals were familiar to many members of the group. Thus, group consensus on the goals was achieved with little controversy. Of the four goals, the most extensive discussion was regarding Goals #2 and #3. Our discussion of these goals addressed definitional clarity and the focus of the goals. Goal #4 emerged as result of group consensus that the three existing goals failed to recognize the opportunity to enrich student learning through the diversity of our international student body, faculty and staff both in Rochester and at our international sites. Goal #4 also recognizes the need to better connect our international alumni as well as the need to ensure a common educational experience across RIT s global sites and across the curriculum as it relates to international, global, and intercultural learning. While there was little controversy regarding the goals, important issues were raised during our discussion of the strategies. We attempted to address these in our proposed goals and strategies, but in many cases our discussion focused on the feasibility of a strategy given the implied resource commitments. These strategies emerge as critically important but potentially expensive elements of our plan for international education and global engagement. We believe these issues warrant highlighting and further consideration as the Strategic Planning Steering committee develops the final version of the plan. 1. Development of policies, processes and supporting governance structures for international activities. Formalizing the governance process and committee structures associated with international engagement will be critical in advancing our goals. All of our goals imply the need for a supporting governance and policy framework for international education. For example, one outcome of Goal #2 might be the development of joint international degrees. RIT currently has no clearly defined policy on dual and joint international degrees. Similarly, there is currently no clear process or policy to guide how we engage globally. These issues are best addressed in the

context of an open and transparent governance process both at the institutional and college level. 2. Greater emphasis on the role and importance of language and culture in international education. Achieving our goals for international education will require both investment in language and cultural education and a commitment to interdisciplinary collaboration. RIT does not currently offer the range of language and culture courses necessary to support its goals for internationalization. Given the growing importance of Chinese, Arabic, and other Asian and Middle Eastern cultures, it will be critical for RIT to consider expanding the number of full-time faculty with knowledge in these areas. In addition, there are substantial opportunities for better integration of language and cultural learning with discipline specific learning. Innovative new models, such as language and culture across the curriculum present new ways of integrating cultural learning and intercultural communication with, geography, policy, and disciplinary applications. Some universities offer courses that integrate language instruction with courses in business, the arts, sciences, technology, and field study opportunities. At RIT, this type of innovation is limited due to the lack of departmental resources and a pedagogical orientation that does not foster interdisciplinary collaboration. 3. Support for faculty to integrate global, international, and intercultural learning into discipline-intensive educational experiences. Developing a new model of global experiential learning will require resources to support both the experiential and course development components. We believe a truly unique interdisciplinary model of international education and global experiential learning is possible at RIT, if the resources are made available to support faculty collaboration and global engagement. These resources include travel support for planning and developing international study and research experiences; teaching support for interdisciplinary course delivery; funds for project materials and supplies; and, support for faculty development and capacity building in international education. Some members of the taskforce expressed concern that our goal of integrating intercultural learning in the disciplinary curriculum would be difficult to implement if structured similar to our approach to writing across the curriculum. There is skepticism about our ability to fully resource and implement our vision for curricular innovation. Challenges in implementing the First Year Experience, the writing requirements, and honors program reform were cited as examples of where our ambitions for innovative curricular change fall short due to limited resources. 4. Support for undergraduate and graduate student travel. International learning experiences should not be limited to students who can afford them. The taskforce had a number of discussions about the need to ensure access to our global experiential learning opportunities by both providing the necessary funding, and by developing programs that are accessible and affordable. Barriers to access are often tied to the socio-economic status of the student and/or physical limitations. Developing the resources to support first generation college attendees and economically disadvantaged students, and providing access support services will be critical to realizing our goals for internationalization. Guiding Principles In addition to the specific goals, our strategic planning taskforce was guided by a set of principles developed by the Academic Senate committee. We believe these principles are important in guiding both the development and implementation of our plan for international education and global engagement, and should not be lost in the process of consolidating or producing a more narrowly defined set of goals related to this dimension of the strategic plan. We have included the principles as an appendix to this executive summary.

Appendix Guiding Principles for International Education 1. Comprehensiveness: RIT is committed to pursuing comprehensive internationalization. This approach to internationalization is integrated and strategic in nature and involves clearly defined curricular and co-curricular international learning outcomes. Comprehensive internationalization reflects a commitment to developing policies, governance structures, partnerships, and programs that foster global and cultural knowledge and enable multi-lateral global engagement of students, faculty, staff and administration. Shared governance and transparency are implicit in the pursuit of comprehensive internationalization and should be reflected in the formal governance structures and procedures associated with RIT s internationalization efforts. Given the comprehensive commitment we are making, and the centrality of international education in the mission of the university, the associated priorities and goals should be specifically reflected in RIT s strategic plan. 2. Faculty leadership: RIT is committed to a model of internationalization achieved through faculty leadership and engagement. Faculty must be empowered to lead RIT s internationalization effort and be given the resources necessary to support international course and program development. Working in collaboration with the administration, the faculty has the responsibility and authority to develop courses and curricula that address our global and international learning outcomes. The faculty is also responsible to act in the best interest of the university and to recognize the unique context in which international education and research often occurs-- a context requiring specialized skills and knowledge of the faculty and support staff. Fostering and developing this body of knowledge across the faculty requires a commitment to actively supporting and encouraging faculty participation in international education and research. Thus, faculty development plans, and promotion and tenure evaluations, should explicitly recognize the value of faculty contributions to international teaching, research, and program development. 3. Academic excellence: RIT is committed to attaining high standards of ethical academic performance in international education. These standards are rooted in the broad range of scholarship and research that informs and advances international education and global engagement. Academic excellence is evidence based and demonstrated through best practices in pedagogy, scholarship, outcomes assessment, and program administration. At RIT, academic excellence implies an understanding of both the theoretical and applied dimensions of international education; and, will often include a strong career orientation. To meet RIT s mission and vision, academic excellence in international education requires experiences that may be beyond those traditionally associated with the university s career orientation. For example, an excellent international education requires an understanding of inclusiveness, diversity, multiculturalism and how these ideals enrich the academic and career goals of our students. Further, academic excellence requires state-of-the-art infrastructure, administrative support structures, and the development of talented and highly motivated faculty and staff. 4. Engagement: RIT is committed to a model of international education that requires and supports active engagement with people from different cultures, races, and ethnic and socio-economic backgrounds. Through engagement, students develop intercultural intelligence and knowledge and create new friendships with colleagues from around the globe. Through engagement, students become aware of how their actions can impact the lives of others and it grounds their ethical and critical thinking in actual experiences of global interconnectedness. In the 21 st Century, most disciplines and careers are globally networked and most problems have inherently global dimensions that can only be understood through active participation and observation

enabled through physical presence. In many disciplines, international engagement is the means to access unique resources that are not available at the RIT campus or in the United States. For example, global engagement is a practical necessity for many in the arts and sciences who study unique natural phenomena; who engage with specialized international communities of scholars; or who must access specialized international research facilities. RIT s commitment to engagement recognizes and values the reciprocal nature of international education and cultural exchange; implying that RIT has a responsibility to foster a spirit of reciprocity in all of its international programs and agreements. Our commitment to engagement is consistent with our goals for inclusion which has been described as, the active, intentional, and ongoing engagement with diversity in people, in the curriculum, in the co-curriculum, and in communities (intellectual, social, cultural, geographical) with which individuals might connect in ways that increase one s awareness, content knowledge, cognitive sophistication, and emphatic understanding of the complex ways individuals interact within systems and institutions (downloaded 4/12/2013 from http://www.rit.edu/diversity/inclusive-excellence-framework). 5. Student Centered Inclusiveness: RIT is committed to developing international learning experiences and academic programs that are student centered, inclusive, and accessible to all students regardless of race, ethnicity, sex, gender, sexual orientation, religion or socioeconomic status. This principle reaffirms RIT s commitment, as expressed in the 2005-2015 strategic plan to: engage all members of the campus community in the shared responsibility for an enriching and inclusive experience for all...; [to] have an enriched academic curriculum with courses and programs addressing a broad understanding of global issues and featuring enhanced opportunities for acquiring language skills...; [and to fostering] a learning, living and working campus community environment that supports and encourages cross-cultural understanding and global awareness. A commitment to student centered inclusiveness is a commitment to developing educational opportunities corresponding to the demographic and cultural realities of RIT students. Our goals for international education must be informed by the values, challenges, barriers, and aspirations of RIT students in order for the faculty to support and influence their development as global citizens.