II. What do phrase markers consist of?

Similar documents
Basic Syntax. Doug Arnold We review some basic grammatical ideas and terminology, and look at some common constructions in English.

Derivational: Inflectional: In a fit of rage the soldiers attacked them both that week, but lost the fight.

Universal Grammar 2. Universal Grammar 1. Forms and functions 1. Universal Grammar 3. Conceptual and surface structure of complex clauses

Inleiding Taalkunde. Docent: Paola Monachesi. Blok 4, 2001/ Syntax 2. 2 Phrases and constituent structure 2. 3 A minigrammar of Italian 3

CS 598 Natural Language Processing

Syntax Parsing 1. Grammars and parsing 2. Top-down and bottom-up parsing 3. Chart parsers 4. Bottom-up chart parsing 5. The Earley Algorithm

1/20 idea. We ll spend an extra hour on 1/21. based on assigned readings. so you ll be ready to discuss them in class

A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many

Chapter 4: Valence & Agreement CSLI Publications

Argument structure and theta roles

Introduction to HPSG. Introduction. Historical Overview. The HPSG architecture. Signature. Linguistic Objects. Descriptions.

Constraining X-Bar: Theta Theory

Proof Theory for Syntacticians

Ch VI- SENTENCE PATTERNS.

ENGBG1 ENGBL1 Campus Linguistics. Meeting 2. Chapter 7 (Morphology) and chapter 9 (Syntax) Pia Sundqvist

Developing a TT-MCTAG for German with an RCG-based Parser

Prediction of Maximal Projection for Semantic Role Labeling

11/29/2010. Statistical Parsing. Statistical Parsing. Simple PCFG for ATIS English. Syntactic Disambiguation

Pseudo-Passives as Adjectival Passives

Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections

Some Principles of Automated Natural Language Information Extraction

Words come in categories

Grammars & Parsing, Part 1:

Case government vs Case agreement: modelling Modern Greek case attraction phenomena in LFG

BULATS A2 WORDLIST 2

Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes in Pak-Pak Language

The Syntax of Coordinate Structure Complexes

Construction Grammar. University of Jena.

Parsing of part-of-speech tagged Assamese Texts

Context Free Grammars. Many slides from Michael Collins

On the Notion Determiner

Minimalism is the name of the predominant approach in generative linguistics today. It was first

Lexical Categories and the Projection of Argument Structure

LING 329 : MORPHOLOGY

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Update on Soar-based language processing

Natural Language Processing. George Konidaris

The subject of adjectives: Syntactic position and semantic interpretation

Objectives. Chapter 2: The Representation of Knowledge. Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, Fourth Edition

Language Acquisition Fall 2010/Winter Lexical Categories. Afra Alishahi, Heiner Drenhaus

Dear Teacher: Welcome to Reading Rods! Reading Rods offer many outstanding features! Read on to discover how to put Reading Rods to work today!

Control and Boundedness

Approaches to control phenomena handout Obligatory control and morphological case: Icelandic and Basque

An Introduction to the Minimalist Program

The presence of interpretable but ungrammatical sentences corresponds to mismatches between interpretive and productive parsing.

a) analyse sentences, so you know what s going on and how to use that information to help you find the answer.

Chunk Parsing for Base Noun Phrases using Regular Expressions. Let s first let the variable s0 be the sentence tree of the first sentence.

Developing Grammar in Context

THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & SOCIAL STUDIES

Theoretical Syntax Winter Answers to practice problems

Visual CP Representation of Knowledge

Compositional Semantics

PROBLEMS IN ADJUNCT CARTOGRAPHY: A CASE STUDY NG PEI FANG FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR

Dependency, licensing and the nature of grammatical relations *

Basic Parsing with Context-Free Grammars. Some slides adapted from Julia Hirschberg and Dan Jurafsky 1

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 154 ( 2014 )

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

Underlying and Surface Grammatical Relations in Greek consider

Chapter 3: Semi-lexical categories. nor truly functional. As Corver and van Riemsdijk rightly point out, There is more

Part I. Figuring out how English works

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

AQUA: An Ontology-Driven Question Answering System

Achim Stein: Diachronic Corpora Aston Corpus Summer School 2011

Language acquisition: acquiring some aspects of syntax.

Modeling Attachment Decisions with a Probabilistic Parser: The Case of Head Final Structures

Aspectual Classes of Verb Phrases

The building blocks of HPSG grammars. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) HPSG grammars from a linguistic perspective

Adjectives tell you more about a noun (for example: the red dress ).

Heads and history NIGEL VINCENT & KERSTI BÖRJARS The University of Manchester

An Interface between Prosodic Phonology and Syntax in Kurdish

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

Chapter 9 Banked gap-filling

Focusing bound pronouns

LNGT0101 Introduction to Linguistics

Grade 6: Module 4: Unit 1: Lesson 3 Tracing a Speaker s Argument: John Stossel DDT Video

Citation for published version (APA): Veenstra, M. J. A. (1998). Formalizing the minimalist program Groningen: s.n.

Disharmonic Word Order from a Processing Typology Perspective. John A. Hawkins, U of Cambridge RCEAL & UC Davis Linguistics

Hindi-Urdu Phrase Structure Annotation

Informatics 2A: Language Complexity and the. Inf2A: Chomsky Hierarchy

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of the Liberal Arts THE TEACHABILITY HYPOTHESIS AND CONCEPT-BASED INSTRUCTION

Unit 8 Pronoun References

A Computational Evaluation of Case-Assignment Algorithms

MERRY CHRISTMAS Level: 5th year of Primary Education Grammar:

The Structure of Relative Clauses in Maay Maay By Elly Zimmer

Intensive English Program Southwest College

Enhancing Unlexicalized Parsing Performance using a Wide Coverage Lexicon, Fuzzy Tag-set Mapping, and EM-HMM-based Lexical Probabilities

Interfacing Phonology with LFG

The Discourse Anaphoric Properties of Connectives

LTAG-spinal and the Treebank

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

Using dialogue context to improve parsing performance in dialogue systems

The Interface between Phrasal and Functional Constraints

A Grammar for Battle Management Language

BANGLA TO ENGLISH TEXT CONVERSION USING OPENNLP TOOLS

Phenomena of gender attraction in Polish *

Tibor Kiss Reconstituting Grammar: Hagit Borer's Exoskeletal Syntax 1

Improved Effects of Word-Retrieval Treatments Subsequent to Addition of the Orthographic Form

Towards a Machine-Learning Architecture for Lexical Functional Grammar Parsing. Grzegorz Chrupa la

The Structure of Multiple Complements to V

A Framework for Customizable Generation of Hypertext Presentations

Transcription:

24.900 Introduction to Linguistics 2/22/05 and 2/23/05 Syntax vocabulary items are comparable to the atoms of physical matter. Atoms do not combine into molecules just because they happen to be next to each other; rather, their combinatorial possibilities are governed by their internal structure I. Some assertions: a. Sentences have hierarchical constituent structure. b. Each constituent in a sentence belongs to a specific syntactic category. c. The categorical constituent structure of sentences can be represented in the form of a Phrase Marker. II. What do phrase markers consist of? NP (D) (AP) N (PP) a. Structure of Phrase Markers: HEADS, SPECIFIERS and COMPLEMENTS 1. Heads: Phrases are built around a nucleus called the head. -The obligatory nucleus around which a phrase is built. Noun Phrase: head is the noun Verb Phrase: head is the verb, etc. NP VP / \ Determiner Noun V / / the books goes Prepositional phrases: in the dome Adjectival phrases: very difficult 1

2. Specifiers a. Semantically, they help to make the meaning of a head more precise. b. Syntactically, they typically mark a phrase boundary. In English, for example, they occur to the left boundary (beginning) of their respective phrases. c. The syntactic category of the specifier differs depending on the category of the head. Some Specifiers: Category Typical Function Examples Determiner specifier of N the, a, this, those, no Qualifier specifier of V never, perhaps, often, always Degree word specifier of A or P very, quite, more, almost 3. Complements a. These elements, which are themselves phrases, provide information about entities and locations whose existence is implied by the meaning of the head. A vegetarian would never[ VP eat {[ NP [ Det [ N a hamburger]]]]}. / / head complement naming the thing eaten (direct object) [ PP in {[ NP [ Det the [ N house]]]]} / / head complement naming a location Some examples of verb complements (Contemporary Linguistics 2005) Complement option Sample heads Example Ø vanish, arrive, die The rabbit vanished_. NP devour, cut, prove The child cut the [ NP the cake]. AP be, become PP to dash, talk NP,NP spare, hand, give NP PPfor buy, cook, reserve 2

EXAMPLES OF NOUN COMPLEMENTS Ø car, boy, electricity the car PP of memory, failure, death the memory [pp of a cat] PP of PP to presentation, gift, donation PP with PP about argument, discussion, conversation EAMPLES OF ADJECTIVE COMPLEMENTS Ø tall, green, smart very tall PP about curious, glad, angry PP to apparent, obvious fond, full, tired PP of EXAMPLES OF PREPOSITION COMPLEMENTS Ø near, away, down (He got) down NP in, on, near PP down, up, out How can we be sure that individual words will occur with a complement of the right type in the syntactic structures? Information about the complements permitted by a particular head is included in its entry in a speaker s lexicon. Devour: Category: V Phonological representation /dəvawər/ Meaning: eat hungrily Complement: NP The term subcategorization is used to refer information about a word s complement options. (syntax, morphology, semantics). Subcategorization information: heads occur only in tree structures where they have compatible complement phrases. Head Direction English is what we call a head initial language. Korean is what we call a head final language. 3

[ VP Close [the door ] ] [ NP desire [ PPfor change]] [[Moonul ]dadala ] byunhwa-edaehan kalmang VP Door close change-for desire III. PHRASE STRUCTURE RULES AGAIN a. They will take the form of the following: X YZ This rule specifies that X can have a Y immediately followed by a Z as its immediate constituents. S(sentence) NP VP VP V (NP) (AP) (PP) AP ADVP A PP P NP NP (Det) N b. Two questions: 1. Is there a way that we can conflate over the categories? 2. Is there a need to consider the possibility of more than one level of category? We have been tacitly assuming that there are word level categories N, A, V etc. and phrasal level categories: NP, AP, VP. IV. X-BAR ( X ) SYNTAX a. Is there any symmetry in the manner in which the phrasal categories can be expanded? b. Can we derive a single rule for the phrase structure? If so, what might it look like? 4

c. What about the ordering of the grammatical units? Can we derive a set of phrase structure rules that would allow us to generalize over grammatical categories and ultimately perhaps allow us to make generalizations cross linguistically? d. The Blueprint: A typical phrase can be broken down into: a head, a specifier, and a complement. XP (Specifier) Head (Complement) V. Returning to Q2 from above for X-bar Syntax: Is there a need for an Intermediate level between Phrasal and Word levels? An X category? The Question is: Do we need intermediate phrasal categories to label expressions that are potentially more than a single word but less than a full phrase? Consider the following example: Every painting of Vest and photo of Brown What we know: 1. The above is clearly an NP because it can appear in NP positions such as the subject of a sentence: Every painting of Vest and photo of Brown appeared in the Tech. What else can NPs do? 2. We have in our phrasal example above an N + PP in each of the conjuncts [ NP [ Det every [ N painting [ PP of [ NP [ N Vest]]]]] {and} [ N photo [ PP of [ NP [ N Brown ]]]] These N + PP sequences are constituents. (How do we know that?) We cannot label each of the N=PP sequences as an N if word level categories are only applied to single words. Nor, however, can we label them NP since they do not appear in positions in which NPs appear. Neither can appear as subject of a sentence. *Painting of Vest appeared in the Tech. *Photo of Brown appeared in the Tech. 5

Thus, we need some other category besides the phrasal or word level category!!!! In the case above, we will use the intermediate category N. NP = N X-bar rules: XP (X ) (Specifier) X X X (Complement) XP (X ) (Specifier) X X (Complement) Head 1. All phrases have a three-level structure (X, X, and XP [X ]) 2. All phrases contain a head, X. 3. If there is a complement, it is attached at the intermediate X level, as a sister of the head. 4. If there is a specifier, it is attached at the XP level. V. Some words about tree geometry: M N O N D E F O H I J M / \ N O / \ / \ D E F H I J 6

KEY TERMS b. BRANCH: A line connecting two parts of the tree. c. NODE: The end of the branch. d. LABEL: The name given to a node. e. ROOT NODE: The node with no line on top of it. f. TERMINAL NODE: Any node with no branch underneath it. g. NON-TERMINAL NODE: Any node with a branch underneath it. h. DOMINANCE: Node A dominates node B if and only if A is higher up in a tree than B and if you can trace a line from A to B going only downwards. (M dominates all the other nodes above. What about N and O?) i. MOTHER: A is the mother of B if A immediately dominates B. j. DAUGHTER: B is the daughter of A if B is immediately dominated by A. k. SISTERS: Two nodes that share the same mother. Practice drawing trees for the following: i. never eat a hamburger ii. the books about the war iii. quite certain about Mary iv. almost in the house How do we build sentences? Merge Operation: Combines words in a manner compatible with the phrase structure schema. NP PP / \ / Det N P / \ \ The N NP P / \ house det N in the house The merge operation is able to take a determiner such as the and combine it with an N consisting of the N house to form the NP (N ) the house. It is then able to take a 7

head such as in the preposition in and combine it with the NP the house to form the P and the PP in the house. Merge the following: The scientists discovered a cure. {The scientists discovered a cure that killed the rat that ate the student that bored the friend that swam the Charles} More important syntactic distinctions: The book of poems The book with a cover Adjunct: An XP that is a sister to a single bar level (N, V, P, A ) and a daughter of a single bar level (N, V, A or P ). Complement: An XP that is a sister to a head (N, V, A, P) and a daughter of a single bar level (N, V, A, or P ). Adjunct rule: Complement rule: X X (ZP) X X (WP) 8

XP g X 1 X ZP > adjunct 1 X WP > complement The book [of poems] [with a cover] 9