Bruce W. Shaw Director, Leadership and Implementation Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Student Achievement Division

Similar documents
Notice of Restraining Order under clause 46 (1) of the Private Career Colleges Act, 2005

Arts, Literature and Communication International Baccalaureate (500.Z0)

CPKN EARNS SILVER AT GTEC

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Culture, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics: Research Papers

Culture, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics: Research Papers 2011

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Grade 7 - Expansion of the Hudson s Bay Company: Contributions of Aboriginal Peoples in Canada

ONTARIO FOOD COLLABORATIVE

University of Toronto

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

ANNUAL REPORT. The South Australian Law Reform Institute. 1 January December 2012

University of Toronto

City of Mississauga Rathburn Road Transit Priority Measures Duke of York Boulevard to Shipp Drive OUR FILE: W.O PREPARED BY: Darek Sobik CC:

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

1110 Main Street, East Hartford, CT Tel: (860) Fax: (860)

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Ontario/Rhône-Alpes Student Exchange Program Summer Research Program Summer Language Program

PIRLS 2006 ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK AND SPECIFICATIONS TIMSS & PIRLS. 2nd Edition. Progress in International Reading Literacy Study.

A comparative study on cost-sharing in higher education Using the case study approach to contribute to evidence-based policy

Early Career Awards (ECA) - Overview

Chapter 4 Culture & Currents of Thought

Past Year Papers For Pyc1501

Educational Support Program Standard

2015 Annual Report to the School Community

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

ONTARIO WHEELCHAIR SPORTS ASSOCIATION Quest for Gold Ontario Athlete Assistance Program ATHLETE SELECTION CRITERIA WHEELCHAIR RUGBY

OCTOBER RECORD OF ACHIEVEMENT. Presented by The Ontario Network of Women in Engineering

Compilation of Data: Ecole Christine Morrison Ecole Mission Central French Immersion & English Programs

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Ministry of Education, Republic of Palau Executive Summary

A Collage Of Canadian Cooking By home Economist in Business Canadian Home Economics Association

CPTED Ontario Newsletter

The Site Visit: How to Prepare for It & What to Expect. STARTALK Conference Atlanta, GA May 3, 2012

CURRICULUM VITAE OF MARIE-LOUISE VIERØ

SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM and the INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROGRAM

State Budget Update February 2016

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

CARPENTRY GRADES 9-12 LEARNING RESOURCES

Testing Schedule. Explained

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

THE 2016 FORUM ON ACCREDITATION August 17-18, 2016, Toronto, ON

RULES OF PROCEDURE. Translation 0 1. PRELIMINARY REMARKS

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

2013 Kentucky Teacher of the Year

Ministry Audit Form 2016

State Parental Involvement Plan

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

Marketing Management

Vertical Teaming. in a small school

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Ohio s Learning Standards-Clear Learning Targets

Objective: Add decimals using place value strategies, and relate those strategies to a written method.

Collaborative Classroom Co-Teaching in Inclusive Settings Course Outline

The SREB Leadership Initiative and its

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

HARLOW COLLEGE FURTHER EDUCATION CORPORATION RESOURCES COMMITTEE. Minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 12 May 2016

ESSENTIAL SKILLS PROFILE BINGO CALLER/CHECKER

Linking Libraries and Academic Achievement

Frequently Asked Questions Archdiocesan Collaborative Schools (ACS)

Training Staff with Varying Abilities and Special Needs

UNIVERSITY OF REGINA. Tuition and fees

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

District Superintendent

Understanding University Funding

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

For Your Future. For Our Future. ULS Strategic Framework

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Certification Inspection Report BRITISH COLUMBIA PROGRAM at

School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne

Specific questions on these recommendations are included below in Section 7.0 of this report.

Catholic School Improvement Learning Cycle Loyola Catholic Secondary School

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Zimsec Geography Past Exam Papers Pdf O Level

Pre-Health Sciences Pathway to Advanced Diplomas and Degrees Program Standard

Financing Education In Minnesota

TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

SECONDARY 1 TEST PAPER PDF

PROGRAM PRESENTATION

Module 2 Protocol and Diplomatic Law:

DRAFT VERSION 2, 02/24/12

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Student Packets and Teacher Guide. Grades 6, 7, 8

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

Results In. Planning Questions. Tony Frontier Five Levers to Improve Learning 1

NEW PROGRAM PROPOSAL [PROGRAM] [DATE]

Entry Plan for the First 100 Days for Tari N. Thomas. Interim Superintendent of Schools Orange, Petersham and RC Mahar Regional

Core Values Engagement and Recommendations October 20, 2016

Current Position Information (if applicable) Current Status: SPA (Salary Grade ) EPA New Position

Transcription:

Ministry of Education The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat 900 Bay Street Mowat Block, 10 th Floor Toronto ON M7A 1L2 Telephone: 416-325-9955 Facsimile: 416-325-8565 Ministère de l Éducation Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie 900, rue Bay Édifice Mowat, 10 e étage Toronto (Ontario) M7A 1L2 Téléphone : 416 325-9955 Télécopieur : 416 325-8565 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Director of Education School Board Bruce W. Shaw Director, Leadership and Implementation Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat DATE: November 20, 2014 Richard Franz Director, Research Evaluation and Capacity Building Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat SUBJECT: K-12 System Implementation and Monitoring (SIM) The goal of the K-12 SIM sessions is to support superintendents with responsibility for schools in the implementation and monitoring of some aspect of mathematics related to the Board Improvement Plan for Student Achievement (BIPSA). Our recommendations for membership on the SIM team are as follows: Superintendents plus elementary and secondary principals from their superintendency at least one member with responsibility for development of the BIPSA in order to leverage learning from SIM across the board School Effectiveness Leads and Student Success Leaders Consultants and coordinators who work directly with the superintendent Other members at the board s discretion Through professional dialogue and study, teams will further develop their capacity to: set specific goals and targets for student learning in mathematics plan and implement specific teaching and learning strategies monitor student achievement results and adjust strategies as needed support the professional learning required to raise achievement align resources to meet mathematics achievement goals engage students and parents in school improvement Page 1 of 5

The School Effectiveness Framework provides a focus for the work of the system and school leadership groups as we share and develop processes for collaborative goal setting, distributed leadership and shared accountability within school improvement teams. For the purposes of evaluating this strategy, school districts will be asked to provide evidence of the impact of this work on system improvement and school improvement efforts. The chart below is a breakdown of the total SIM funding allocated to your district school board (DSB); this total includes: $25,000 that was previously allocated to each board for regional sessions, an additional amount of OFIP/SIM that was based on the number of SIM schools in your district based on EQAO 2012/13 data, $4,500 for Net New Schools to SIM in response to the 2013-14 EQAO results (This is based on the numbers of schools in a board that generate SIM funding based on 2013-14 EQAO results compared to 2012-13 results. A board in which more schools were identified by 2013-14 results is funded $4,500 for each additional school. If the net number of new SIM schools is 0 or is less, funding remains as outlined in the B Memo) $4,500 for High Priority SIM schools (Schools categorized in the lowest achieving SIM category (4 of 6, or 2 of 3 assessments below 50% for one year, and are therefore not OFIP participants)) $4,500 for New SIM schools Exiting from OFIP (This is based on the number of schools in a DSB that were in OFIP in the 2013-14 school year whose EQAO results for 2013-14 were in one of the SIM categories. This is designed to maintain a level of support for these schools who have very recently been low achieving.) In each case, a SIM school generates $4500 in addition to the base SIM amount generated by each school ($2200), as explained in the B Memo from March 27, 2014, in Addition to Grants for Student Needs. Additionally, the funding allocation includes SIM schools where EQAO data was suppressed. Again this year, a funding category has been maintained for those schools designated High Priority SIM schools. This funding is generated by schools facing particular achievement challenges, where additional support is required. Any SIM planning should include these schools as priority schools for SIM. The schools in your board who meet this new funding criterion are: (to be filled in for each school board) Page 2 of 5

Allocated in Spring SIM B Memo for Regional Networking SIM/OFIP B Memo (EQAO 2012-13 Data) $25,000 Board-specific Net New Schools to SIM this Memo Allocated in Fall High Priority SIM This Memo New SIM Schools Exiting from OFIP Total (Not Including OFIP) * Total SIM Provided for 2014-15 Budget Year * Some boards have OFIP schools. This SIM total does not include OFIP funds which were nd outlined in the September 22 memo to Directors of Education with OFIP schools. Funds allocated for the SIM initiative are to be used for: release time for capacity building including release time for networking with colleagues across networks of schools travel costs for the System Implementation and Monitoring Team to attend regional learning sessions travel costs for School Improvement Teams to attend learning sessions facilitated by the System Implementation and Monitoring Team. This total SIM funding, in combination with OFIP funding, supports the work of system and school improvement in all schools. Identifying and Forming Clusters of Schools Except for the High Priority SIM schools named above, the Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat will not designate specific schools as part of this initiative. All schools are expected to benefit from participation in a network of schools as part of this initiative. School Districts have flexibility in forming their networks of schools and in determining which schools will receive a more intensive focus. Factors that may influence how schools are grouped and how funding is allotted are: the commitment of school staff to identify a focus that is related to improving student achievement and is aligned to the goals of their Board and School Improvement Plans; the commitment of the School Improvement Team to work closely with their System Implementation and Monitoring Team in partnership with ministry staff; the district s plan to maximize the potential of schools that are ready to move total funds allocated to the board for OFIP and SIM. Page 3 of 5

Regional Capacity-Building Sessions for System Implementation and Monitoring Teams School Districts will identify a System Implementation and Monitoring Team who commit to providing leadership and direct support to identified schools. The system team is ideally composed of family of schools supervisory officers and a number of elementary and secondary principals from the family. The School Effectiveness Leader and Student Success Leader need to be members. Members of the System Implementation and Monitoring Team will participate in three sessions of professional learning dialogue with regional colleagues and will apply these experiences in their work with the School Improvement Teams of the identified schools. Participants must register with their host boards which are listed below. School Districts were alerted to the dates of the Fall regional sessions. The remaining dates are: K-12 SIM 2 - Winter 2015 January 8-9, 2015 London East (Hamilton-Wentworth Catholic DSB) January 14 and 15, 2015 Toronto (Peel DSB) January 16, 2015 Ottawa (EOSDN) January 27-28, 2015 Thunder Bay (Lakehead DSB) February 3-4, 2015 Sudbury/North Bay (Sudbury Catholic DSB) February 10-11, 2015 Barrie (Durham DSB) February 12-13, 2015 London West (Huron Perth Catholic DSB) K-12 SIM 3 - Spring 2015 March 31-April 1, 2015 Thunder Bay (Lakehead DSB) April 21 and 22, 2015 Toronto (Peel DSB) April 23-24, 2015 London West (Huron Perth Catholic DSB) April 28-29, 2015 Sudbury/North Bay (Sudbury Catholic DSB May 5-6, 2015 Barrie (Durham DSB) May 7-8, 2015 London East (Hamilton-Wentworth Catholic DSB) May 14, 2015 Ottawa (EOSDN) Logistical details about the regional sessions will be communicated directly to the School Effectiveness Leader and the Student Success Leader in each district. If you have any questions regarding funding, please contact Sue Knight at Sue.Knight@ontario.ca. For all other questions please contact your LNS Field Team Lead, your ESSEO or Judy Speirs at judy.speirs@ontario.ca. Page 4 of 5

We look forward to working and learning together to make a difference for all students and appreciate your ongoing commitment to supporting all schools in the continuing improvement journey. Original signed by Bruce W. Shaw and Richard Franz Bruce W. Shaw and Richard Franz Directors, Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat cc. Mary Jean Gallagher, Chief Student Achievement Officer of Ontario, Assistant Deputy Minister, Rob J. Andrews, Director, Student Success/Learning to 18, Strategic Implementation, Innovation and Support Team Leads, Literacy & Numeracy Secretariat Kathy Verduyn, Director, Field Services Branch Regional Managers, Field Services Branch School Effectiveness Leaders, District School Boards Student Success Leaders, District School Boards External Student Success Education Officers Page 5 of 5