Senior Survey results. Summary for Virginia Tech. Prepared by The Office of Academic Assessment June 2011

Similar documents
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

SCHOOL. Wake Forest '93. Count

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

National Survey of Student Engagement

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

LIM College New York, NY

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Organization Profile

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

Sociology. M.A. Sociology. About the Program. Academic Regulations. M.A. Sociology with Concentration in Quantitative Methodology.

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Quantitative Study with Prospective Students: Final Report. for. Illinois Wesleyan University Bloomington, Illinois

University of Arizona

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

12-month Enrollment

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

Department of Social Work Master of Social Work Program

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

MSW Application Packet

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

How to Apply for Fellowships & Internships Connecting students to global careers!

August 30, Dear Dean Clover:

MPA Internship Handbook AY

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

HWS Colleges' Social Norms Surveys Online. Survey of Student-Athlete Norms

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Legislative Counsel Bureau and Nevada Legislature 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV Equal Opportunity Employer

Section 1 of 2. Demographics

User Manual. Understanding ASQ and ASQ PLUS /ASQ PLUS Express and Planning Your Study

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

Bachelor of Arts in Gender, Sexuality, and Women's Studies

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Monitoring Metacognitive abilities in children: A comparison of children between the ages of 5 to 7 years and 8 to 11 years

4. Long title: Emerging Technologies for Gaming, Animation, and Simulation

Chemistry 495: Internship in Chemistry Department of Chemistry 08/18/17. Syllabus

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

A Diverse Student Body

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

National Survey of Student Engagement at UND Highlights for Students. Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Office of Institutional Research April 19, 2012

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

INDIVIDUALIZED STUDY, BIS

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

CI at a Glance. ttp://

Interdisciplinary Ph.D. in Education Sciences College of Education, University of Kentucky

Art and Art History Department: Overview

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

Handbook for Graduate Students in TESL and Applied Linguistics Programs

Azusa Pacific University Azusa, CA

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

We are strong in research and particularly noted in software engineering, information security and privacy, and humane gaming.


College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

Hiring Procedures for Faculty. Table of Contents

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

MBA 510: Critical Thinking for Managers

THIS KIT CONTAINS ALL THE INFORMATION YOU NEED

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Proposal for Learning Community Program

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

General syllabus for third-cycle courses and study programmes in

Native American Education Board Update

THE APPROVED LIST OF HUMANITIES-SOCIAL SCIENCES COURSES FOR ENGINEERING DEGREES

What We Are Learning about Successful Programs In College Calculus

PROMOTION and TENURE GUIDELINES. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Gordon Ford College of Business Western Kentucky University

Curricular Practical Training (CPT) is a type of employment authorization for students in F-1 status who Eligibility

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Transcription:

2010-2011 Senior Survey results Summary for Virginia Tech Prepared by The Office of Academic Assessment June 2011 Undergraduate students intending to graduate in December 2010, May 2011 or summer 2011 were asked to complete a web-based survey soliciting their opinions regarding aspects of their experience at Virginia Tech. After an initial email contact and three follow-up emails from the Office of Academic Assessment, 1916 of students across the University returned completed surveys, resulting in a response rate of 36%. Typically response rates for this survey are between 42-48%; this year s temporary drop was due to new survey software we implemented. As you review the attached information, just a reminder that the quality of these data are dependent on the number of students responding, the response rate for your area, and the particular wording of each question. The survey provides only an overview of student perceptions and does not allow for in-depth probing that would lead to explanations behind those perceptions. Results, however, may indicate where to take a closer look in your department. As you review this information or have questions regarding the results or the survey process, contact Dr. Steve Culver, Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment, sculver@vt.edu 231-4581.

1. The course work in my major department University Mean (SD) 1. was intellectually challenging 0% 1.% 2% 13% 46% 37% 5.15 (0.85) 2. required me to think critically 0% 1% 2% 10% 44% 42% 5.22 (0.85) 3. increased my understanding of my field 0% 1% 1% 7% 34% 58% 5.46 (0.75) 4. helped me become a better writer 2% 6% 12% 32% 28% 20% 4.37 (1.22) 5. helped me synthesize information from different sources 1% 1% 3% 20% 46% 29% 4.95 (0.92) 6. presented me with alternate points of view 1% 2% 6% 21% 44% 26% 4.84 (1.01) Note. n = 1916

1. The course work in my major department (Continued) University Mean (SD) 7. applied concepts learned in class to new situations 1% 1% 3% 18% 47% 31% 5.01 (0.90) 8. increased my understanding of ethical behavior 2% 4% 6% 26% 41% 21% 4.66 (1.09) 9. incorporated technology that enhanced my learning 2% 3% 8% 23% 36% 28% 4.70 (1.16) 10. increased my knowledge of technology 2% 5% 10% 23% 32% 27% 4.59 (1.25) Note. n = 1916

1. The faculty in my major department University Mean (SD) 11. set high standards for my learning 1% 1% 3% 16% 41% 38% 5.10 (0.95) 12. encouraged active learning 1% 2% 4% 16% 41% 37% 5.06 (0.98) 13. encouraged student-faculty interaction outside the classroom 14. provided opportunities for students to learn cooperatively 15. were concerned about student learning and development 16. were accessible outside of class 2% 5% 12% 29% 31% 20% 4.43 (1.20) 1% 1% 4% 21% 42% 31% 4.96 (0.95) 1% 2% 5% 20% 45% 27% 4.86 (1.01) 1% 1% 4% 20% 45% 29% 4.95 (0.93) 17. knew me as a person 3% 7% 12% 28% 28% 22% 4.37 (1.30) Note. n = 1916

2. When you had a question or needed clarification regarding an academic problem (e.g., what courses to take, graduation requirements, etc.) from which of the following resources were you more likely to seek an answer? (check all that apply) My official academic advisor 67% College or department professional advisor 35% College Academic Programs office 4% A faculty member in my major department 41% A faculty member outside of my major department 7% A staff member 14% University catalog 29% Departmental materials 36% Other students 58% Note. n= 1859. Total may be greater than 100% due to multiple responses.

3. Which of the following best describes your official academic advisor? A departmental undergraduate academic advisor 36% A faculty member in my major department 52% A faculty member outside my major department 1% A staff member 2% I don't know 9% Note. n= 1859

4. In the last year, how many times did you meet with your OFFICIAL academic advisor? None 25% One time 20% Two times 21% Three times 16% Four times 7% Five or more times 11% Note. n= 1859

5. In the last year, how many times did you have telephone or email contact with your OFFICIAL academic advisor? None 26% One time 15% Two times 17% Three times 12% Four times 8% Five or more times 22% Note. n= 1859

6. Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statement regarding your OFFICIAL academic advisor. University Mean (SD) 1. I had adequate access to my academic advisor 4% 4% 7% 17% 34% 34% 4.75 (1.32) 2. My academic advisor was available when I needed help 3. I was given sufficient time with my academic advisor 4% 4% 7% 17% 32% 35% 4.73 (1.34) 4% 5% 9% 14% 33% 34% 4.71 (1.37) 4. My academic advisor provided me with accurate information about degree requirements and course sequencing Note. n = 1795 5% 6% 9% 15% 30% 36% 4.66 (1.45)

6. Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statement regarding your OFFICIAL academic advisor. (Continued) University Mean (SD) 5. My academic advisor was knowledgeable about the requirements needed to complete my degree 5% 5% 7% 15% 30% 39% 4.77 (1.39) 6. My academic advisor provided me with assistance selecting appropriate elective courses. 8% 8% 11% 17% 26% 31% 4.39 (1.57) Note. n = 1795

7. The course work in my second major department University Mean (SD) 1. was intellectually challenging 1% 1% 5% 14% 46% 32% 4.98 (0.99) 2. required me to think critically 1% 1% 4% 17% 42% 34% 4.98 (1.02) 3. increased my understanding of my field 1% 1% 3% 15% 35% 45% 5.17 (0.96) 4. helped me become a better writer 2% 7% 8% 25% 29% 28% 4.58 (1.28) 5. helped me synthesize information from different sources 1% 3% 4% 18% 45% 29% 4.91 (1.03) 6. presented me with alternate points of view 1% 3% 6% 17% 37% 35% 4.91 (1.13) Note. n = 275

7. The course work in my second major department (Continued) University Mean (SD) 7. applied concepts learned in class to new situations 2% 0% 3% 18% 44% 33% 5.00 (0.98) 8. increased my understanding of ethical behavior 2% 7% 8% 23% 33% 27% 4.59 (1.26) 9. incorporated technology that enhanced my learning 5% 7% 13% 23% 31% 23% 4.36 (1.38) 10. increased my knowledge of technology 5% 11% 14% 21% 30% 19% 4.18 (1.44) Note. n = 275

7. The faculty in my second major department University Mean (SD) 11. set high standards for my learning 2% 4% 5% 16% 41% 31% 4.84 (1.16) 12. encouraged active learning 3% 3% 5% 17% 36% 37% 4.91 (1.18) 13. encouraged student-faculty interaction outside the classroom 4% 3% 11% 23% 35% 24% 4.53 (1.28) 14. provided opportunities for students to learn cooperatively 2% 4% 4% 18% 40% 32% 4.87 (1.15) 15. were concerned about student learning and development 3% 2% 5% 19% 41% 31% 4.87 (1.12) 16. were accessible outside of class 2% 2% 4% 17% 44% 31% 4.93 (1.05) 17. knew me as a person 5% 5% 8% 25% 32% 25% 4.51 (1.34) Note. n = 275

8. From my experiences at Virginia Tech, I have improved my... University Mean (SD) 1. writing skills 2% 4% 7% 23% 40% 26% 4.72 (1.10) 2. oral communication skills 0% 2% 3% 16% 44% 34% 5.04 (0.93) 3. critical thinking skills 0% 1% 1% 10% 45% 43% 5.27 (0.80) 4. computer skills 1% 3% 7% 23% 39% 26% 4.75 (1.09) 5. understanding of ethical behavior 1% 2% 5% 24% 43% 25% 4.82 (0.99) 6. ability to retrieve information and resources to help solve a problem 0% 1% 1% 14% 45% 39% 5.19 (0.81) Note. n = 1709

8. From my experiences at Virginia Tech, I have improved my (Continued) University Mean (SD) 7. understanding of the cultural traditions that have shaped Western experience 3% 7% 11% 31% 32% 16% 4.31 (1.23) 8. knowledge of the interaction between tradition and innovation 2% 4% 10% 30% 38% 17% 4.46 (1.13) 9. ability to compare alternative theories about human society, culture, and behavior 2% 5% 7% 27% 38% 21% 4.60 (1.14) 10. understanding of patterns and processes that affect the relationship between the individual and society 2% 4% 8% 27% 39% 21% 4.59 (1.12) 11. ability to evaluate the credibility of, use and misuse of scientific information 1% 2% 6% 23% 42% 25% 4.80 (1.03) Note. n = 1709

8. From my experiences at Virginia Tech, I have improved my (Continued) University Mean (SD) 12. ability to describe methods of inquiry that lead to scientific knowledge 1% 2% 7% 24% 43% 23% 4.74 (1.02) 13. quantitative reasoning and problem solving skills 1% 2% 3% 16% 44% 34% 5.01 (0.98) 14. understanding of fundamental principles of reasoning involved in mathematics or logic 2% 4% 8% 20% 39% 28% 4.72 (1.17) 15. understanding of the relationship between art and society 5% 9% 16% 29% 27% 15% 4.09 (1.33) 16. knowledge of classic works of fine and applied arts 6% 10% 17% 28% 25% 13% 3.96 (1.39) Note. n = 1709

From my experiences at Virginia Tech, I have improved my (Continued) University Mean (SD) 17. knowledge of different cultures and lifestyles 3% 5% 9% 28% 35% 20% 4.48 (1.22) 18. knowledge of environmental issues 2% 4% 8% 24% 35% 27% 4.67 (1.16) 19. ability to solve problems creatively 1% 1% 3% 17% 45% 33% 5.04 (0.91) 20. ability to lead people effectively 1% 2% 3% 17% 43% 34% 5.03 (0.96) 21. knowledge of global issues 1% 3% 7% 23% 40% 25% 4.72 (1.10) Note. n = 1709

9. Which of the following have you participated in while at Virginia Tech? (check all that apply) Internship, field experience, co-op, or practicum 63% Community service or volunteer work AS PART OF A COURSE 30% Community service or volunteer work OUTSIDE OF ANY COURSE REQUIREMENTS 71% University learning community 10% Note. n= 1662. Total may be greater than 100% due to multiple responses.

9. Which of the following have you participated in while at Virginia Tech? (Continued) Research project with a faculty member AS PART OF A COURSE/PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 25% Research project with a faculty member 19% Study abroad 18% Attended a professional or scholarly meeting or conference 51% Gave a talk or exhibited your work at a professional, scholarly, cultural, or artistic conference or meeting 21% Note. n= 1662. Total may be greater than 100% due to multiple responses.

9. Which of the following have you participated in while at Virginia Tech? (Continued) Intramural sports 52% Intercollegiate sports 10% Organizations or clubs designed for people in your primary major 51% Other student organizations 51% Note. n= 1662. Total may be greater than 100% due to multiple responses.

10. What is your graduation date? December 2010 19% May 2011 75% Summer 2011 4% Other 1% Note. n= 1691

11. What year did you first enter Virginia Tech? 2009 or later 4% 2008 12% 2007 59% 2006 20% 2005 2% 2004 or before 2% Note. n= 1691

12. How many classes have you taken for VT credit at other institutions (not counting AP and Dual Enrollment courses taken during high school)? 0 45% 1-3 22% 4-6 10% 7-10 5% 11-13 3% 14-16 3% More than 16 14% Note. n= 1691

13. How many times did you change your major? 0 57% 1 32% 2 8% 3 3% 4 or more 1% Note. n= 1691

14. If you changed your major at least once, please indicate the most important reason why you did so? I did not change my major 56% Academic difficulties in my previous major 3% Lack of interest in my previous major 9% More interest in subject matter of my new major 14% My new major was easier for me 1% My new major better fit my career goals 10% I can earn more money with a degree in my new major 1% Faculty reputation in my new major 0% Other 5% Note. n= 1691

15. Which of the following best describes your current GPA? Less than 2.00 1% 2.01-2.25 2% 2.26-2.50 4% 2.51-2.75 8% 2.76-3.00 17% 3.01-3.25 20% 3.26-3.50 22% 3.51-3.75 15% 3.76-4.00 11% Note. n= 1691

16. Your current age? 22 or younger 80% 23-24 15% 25-27 3% 28-30 1% 31-35 1% 36 or older 0% Note. n= 1691

17. What is your racial or ethnic background? African American 3% Asian/Pacific Islander 5% Hispanic/Latino 2% Native American 0% White (non-hispanic) 84% Multi-racial 2% None of the above categories 1% Prefer not to answer 3% Note. n= 1691

18. Your gender? Female 56% Male 44% Note. n= 1691

19. What is most likely to be your principal activity upon graduation? (check all that apply) Employment, full-time paid 58% Employment, part-time paid 5% Graduate or Professional School, fulltime Graduate or Professional School, parttime 27% 1% Additional undergraduate coursework 1% Military Service 3% Volunteer Activity (e.g., Peace Corps) 2% Starting or raising a family 0% Other 3% Note. n= 1691. Total may be greater than 100% due to multiple responses.

20. If you were to do it all over again Definitely no Probably no Probably yes Definitely yes University Mean (SD) would you attend Virginia Tech again? 2% 5% 23% 69% 3.60 (0.68) Note. n = 1691