Ascension Parish Making Progress

Similar documents
FY16 UW-Parkside Institutional IT Plan Report

Spring 2015 Online Testing. Program Information and Registration and Technology Survey (RTS) Training Session

Appendix L: Online Testing Highlights and Script

SER CHANGES~ACCOMMODATIONS PAGES

ADMN-1311: MicroSoft Word I ( Online Fall 2017 )

Five Challenges for the Collaborative Classroom and How to Solve Them

Midland College Syllabus MUSI 1311 Music Theory I SCH (3-3)

Intel-powered Classmate PC. SMART Response* Training Foils. Version 2.0

Smarter ELA/Literacy and Mathematics Interim Comprehensive Assessment (ICA) and Interim Assessment Blocks (IABs) Test Administration Manual (TAM)

Connect Communicate Collaborate. Transform your organisation with Promethean s interactive collaboration solutions

Call Center Assessment-Technical Support (CCA-Technical Support)

Spring 2015 Achievement Grades 3 to 8 Social Studies and End of Course U.S. History Parent/Teacher Guide to Online Field Test Electronic Practice

FAU Mobile App Goes Live

K 1 2 K 1 2. Iron Mountain Public Schools Standards (modified METS) Checklist by Grade Level Page 1 of 11

CIS 121 INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS - SYLLABUS

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

Student Handbook. Supporting Today s Students with the Technology of Tomorrow

SSTATE SYSIP STEMIC IMPROVEMENT PL A N APRIL 2016

PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) Activity Packet

Education the telstra BLuEPRint

Test Administrator User Guide

Introduction to Mobile Learning Systems and Usability Factors

SYLLABUS- ACCOUNTING 5250: Advanced Auditing (SPRING 2017)

Common Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success

Software Development Plan

Louisiana Free Materials List

State Budget Update February 2016

Chapter 7 Information and Communications Technology: Platforms for Learning and Teaching

New Paths to Learning with Chromebooks

TA Certification Course Additional Information Sheet

Technology Plan Woodford County Versailles, Kentucky

Protocol for using the Classroom Walkthrough Observation Instrument

Student User s Guide to the Project Integration Management Simulation. Based on the PMBOK Guide - 5 th edition

Specialized Equipment Amount (SEA)

MANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM

ONLINE COURSES. Flexibility to Meet Middle and High School Students at Their Point of Need

Science Olympiad Competition Model This! Event Guidelines

COMM370, Social Media Advertising Fall 2017

Education & Training Plan Civil Litigation Specialist Certificate Program with Externship

Kannapolis Charter Academy

Virginia Principles & Practices of Real Estate for Salespersons

Experience College- and Career-Ready Assessment User Guide

Star Math Pretest Instructions

Please find below a summary of why we feel Blackboard remains the best long term solution for the Lowell campus:

GACE Computer Science Assessment Test at a Glance

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides

An Introduction and Overview to Google Apps in K12 Education: A Web-based Instructional Module

The Teaching and Learning Center

Navigating the PhD Options in CMS

Beginning to Flip/Enhance Your Classroom with Screencasting. Check out screencasting tools from (21 Things project)

2013 Annual HEITS Survey (2011/2012 data)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

Education for an Information Age

Software Maintenance

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

D Road Maps 6. A Guide to Learning System Dynamics. System Dynamics in Education Project

E-Learning Readiness in the Hinterland of Batam

Session Six: Software Evaluation Rubric Collaborators: Susan Ferdon and Steve Poast

Renaissance Learning 32 Harbour Exchange Square London, E14 9GE +44 (0)

Enter the World of Polling, Survey &

Mooresville Charter Academy

Training Catalogue for ACOs Global Learning Services V1.2. amadeus.com

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

Beveridge Primary School. One to one laptop computer program for 2018

Comprehensive Program Review (CPR)

Table of Contents. Course Delivery Method. Instructor Information. Phone: Office hours: Table of Contents. Course Description

On Human Computer Interaction, HCI. Dr. Saif al Zahir Electrical and Computer Engineering Department UBC

Computer Software Evaluation Form

An Industrial Technologist s Core Knowledge: Web-based Strategy for Defining Our Discipline

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

WiggleWorks Software Manual PDF0049 (PDF) Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

K5 Math Practice. Free Pilot Proposal Jan -Jun Boost Confidence Increase Scores Get Ahead. Studypad, Inc.

The Tutor Shop Homework Club Family Handbook. The Tutor Shop Mission, Vision, Payment and Program Policies Agreement

Speech Recognition at ICSI: Broadcast News and beyond

SYSTEM QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS FOR SELECTING MOBILE LEARNING APPLICATIONS

BADM 641 (sec. 7D1) (on-line) Decision Analysis August 16 October 6, 2017 CRN: 83777

La Grange Park Public Library District Strategic Plan of Service FY 2014/ /16. Our Vision: Enriching Lives

Naviance / Family Connection

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Developing, Supporting, and Sustaining Future Ready Learning

Clicks, Bricks and Spondulicks

Meriam Library LibQUAL+ Executive Summary

RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Using Virtual Manipulatives to Support Teaching and Learning Mathematics

K-12 Blueprint Logo Placement

To the Student: ABOUT THE EXAM


Expert Reference Series of White Papers. Mastering Problem Management

Using Moodle in ESOL Writing Classes

USER ADAPTATION IN E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

CPMT 1347 Computer System Peripherals COURSE SYLLABUS

Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series

The Creation and Significance of Study Resources intheformofvideos

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL

Learning, Communication, and 21 st Century Skills: Students Speak Up For use with NetDay Speak Up Survey Grades 3-5

Student Information System. Parent Quick Start Guide

EdX Learner s Guide. Release

State Parental Involvement Plan

Transcription:

JANUARY 2013 Volume 2 Ascension Parish Making Progress LOUISIANA BELIEVES: Louisiana s Technology Footprint www.louisianabelieves.com

Technology has changed the way educators teach, how students learn, and the way teachers and students communicate. Making the Commitment The Louisiana Department of Education (LDOE) is committed to support its schools in their efforts to ensure technology is available for preparing students to be college and career ready, supporting accountability and more rigorous standards, supporting teaching effectiveness, and ensuring school improvement. As a result of this commitment, LDOE has created the Louisiana Believes: Louisiana s Technology Footprint to serve as a tool for LEAs and schools to analyze their current technology readiness status and to create, implement and evaluate their strategic efforts related to technology devices, infrastructure, bandwidth and support. This document is a living document that will continue to be updated and enhanced biannually as the state, districts and schools work toward achieving their educational and assessment technology goals. Seventy-seven (77) public school systems completed the fall 2012 submission of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Technology Readiness Tool (TRT) survey. The fall data collection, expanded upon previous submissions by collecting additional data on testing environments, connectivity options, device specifications, and testing parameters. Based on this new information, many schools readiness statuses have changed. In addition to collecting more information, PARCC released new minimum device specifications in an effort to assist districts who are struggling to meet the recommended standards. Districts should not take this release as a notification that they can relax and not continue to strive toward ensuring all devices meet the recommended specifications. Instead districts and schools should consider these devices as a back-up plan that is hopefully not needed. PARCC also released new guidance relative to Internet access and network utilization for the testing window. The calculations provided do not take into account robust enhanced items; however LDOE has attempted to provide estimated usage for districts to use in their planning. As better guidance is developed, LDOE will include that information within its footprint documentation Future footprints will also provide districts with clear guidance relative to testing times and test scheduling. Each state is required to determine a subset of testing guidance for their schools and districts which fall within the larger broader windows that PARCC must provide to its 28 state consortium. Until this guidance is released, the state has provided estimated calculations for the LEAs to use for planning purposes. 2

Statewide Improvement Overall initial baseline data provided via the PARCC Technology Readiness Tool suggests that the state has over 232,692 computer devices with only 82,754 of these devices recommended device readiness specifications as well as testing environment specifications. There are an additional 92,287 computers which meet PARCC minimum hardware specifications for testing in 2014-15. Of the 232,692, there are an additional 5,080 devices that met recommended hardware specifications but their availability for testing was unknown. These devices will be assessed in future footprint reports as more data is collected. Districts also have over 37,000 devices that could potentially be upgraded to meet testing specifications. If none of these devices can be upgraded, LEAs across the state would need to purchase a minimum of 14, 913 devices to meet PARCC minimum standards and 46,413 devices to meet recommended standards. We should note, the PARCC minimum specifications will only be valid for 2014-15 testing. Future testing administrations will require all devices meet the recommended device specification. In addition, once all of the parameters for administering the PARCC online tests are known, minimum device specifications could change. The state and its districts will continue to monitor and analyze device technology readiness to ensure all schools are prepared for testing. Survey results also showed that 100% of participating schools have Internet access, however 90% of these schools also reported Internet or network congestion, school-level network hardware that limits connectivity, nonexistent or limited wireless access within school sites and dwindling IT staff to support technology expansions. The surveys also sought to identify the levels of concern related to the staffing and training of personnel required for administering statewide online assessments. Although schools indicated various levels of concern in the four areas of questioning, 98% of districts had schools that indicated a need for additional information technology and/or testing administration staff as well as training for testing administration and support personnel. District and school concern levels varied on the need for training of test coordinators and IT staff. Additional information on both training and staffing needs will need to be collected in future technology readiness surveys in order for LDOE and districts to determine if their current capacity is adequate for testing. Districts and schools strongly reiterated throughout their surveys the concerns and challenges relative to the increased technology burden, insufficient numbers of computers, and lack of dedicated funding to support the expansion of online assessments. Statewide Testing Device Needs Across the state, 17 districts have enough devices to test in 2014-15 based on PARCC minimum standards and 10 districts have enough devices to test based on recommended standards. The chart below demonstrates the number of devices which districts will either need to purchase or upgrade to meet current recommended standards. In thousands Testing devices required Additional devices needed 1-to-1 1-to-3 1-to-5 1-to-7 3

Key points In preparing and planning for online testing, districts and schools should set milestone targets in the 3 key areas of readiness: device readiness, network readiness and staff readiness. Device Readiness Schools and districts should plan and implement efforts to upgrade and procure an adequate number of devices to meet, at a minimum, testing needs. All devices should meet the LDOE recommended device specifications. which only meet PARCC minimum specifications will not meet minimum testing specifications starting in 2015. Network Readiness Schools and districts should strategically plan any necessary network and Internet upgrades. As a cost saving option, districts can phase in new wireless infrastructures for testing by first creating a wireless network for their testing labs and then expanding that wireless network for classroom learning. Staff Readiness Schools and districts need to assess their ability to manage and monitor testing as well as to provide technology support during each testing window. Districts may want to consider short-term staff augmentation to assist in these areas. Districts should also assess if any of their full-time staff needs professional development or further training. PARCC Minimum Device Specifications Desktop, Laptop, Netbook, & Thin Client/VDI Operating Systems: Windows XP Service Pack 3 or newer Mac OS Mac OS 10.5 or newer Linux (Ubuntu 9-10, Fedora 6) Chrome OS 19 Memory: 512 MB of RAM LDOE Recommended Device Specifications Desktop, Laptop, Netbook, & Thin Client/VDI Operating Systems: Windows 7 or newer Mac OS 10.7 or newer Linux (Ubuntu 11:10, Fedora 16 or newer) Chrome OS 19 or newer Memory: 1 GB of RAM (preferably 2 GB of RAM) tablets Operating Systems: Android 4.0, Apple ipad 2 running ios6, Windows 8 Pro Memory: 1 GB of RAM or greater ALL DEVICES Connectivity: Wired or wireless access to the Internet Screen Size: 9.5 inch screen size or larger Screen Resolution: 1024 x 768 resolution or better Input Device Requirements*: Keyboard & Mouse/Touchpad Headphone/Earphone and Microphone Requirements: Headphones/earphones and microphones are required for all students taking the English Language Arts/Literacy Speaking and Listening Assessment. Headphones/earphones are required for students using text to speech or other auditory accommodations. Microphones are required for students using speech to text accommodations. tablets Operating Systems: Android 4.0, Apple ipad 2 running ios6, Windows 8 Pro or newer Memory: 1 GB of RAM or greater ALL DEVICES Connectivity: Wired or wireless access to the Internet Screen Size: 9.5 inch screen size or larger Screen Resolution: 1024 x 768 resolution or better Input Device Requirements*: Keyboard & Mouse/Touchpad Headphone/Earphone and Microphone Requirements: Headphones/earphones and microphones are required for all students taking the English Language Arts/Literacy Speaking and Listening Assessment. Headphones/earphones are required for students using text to speech or other auditory accommodations. Microphones are required for students using speech to text accommodations. * The input device must allow students to control an on-screen cursor to point, click, drag, and select an area. The input device must allow students to enter letters, numbers, and symbols and shift, tab, return, and backspace. Other assistive technologies may be needed for students requiring accommodations. PARCC and LDOE will release Accessibility and Accommodations Guidelines in June 2013. 4

Schools must evaluate and make concrete plans for both expanding and improving technology access for day-to-day instruction in the classroom and for testing. Ascension Parish Footprint DEVICE READINESS The Louisiana Department of Education recognizes that it is essential for all schools to have adequate technology resources to support online assessment and 21st century learning environments. Educational experts agree schools should meet a ratio of 4- to 5-students-per-instructional computer in order for technology to be effective in the classroom. Schools who meet this ratio should also meet technology readiness requirements as long as their classroom instructional computers can also be utilized in a secure testing environment as well. In Ascension Parish, 28 out of 28 schools have an adequate number of computers that meet current recommended computer hardware specifications and 28 out of 28 that meet minimum recommended computer hardware specifications for online testing in 2014-15 based on a 7:1 student-to-computer ratio and on devices which were either in or could be moved into a secure testing environment. Since some of the schools within the district have computers which only meet the minimum specifications it is strongly recommended that the district reevaluate its current computer inventory to determine if any of these devices can be upgraded to meet the recommended specifications. If not, the district needs to begin implementing plans to improve its device readiness. Currently, LDOE is estimating testing to require a minimum of a 7:1 studentto-computer ratio; however, this ratio will change as more concrete testing times, testing windows and testing guidelines are finalized. On the following page, is a detailed chart that provides a breakdown of devices and student-to-computer ratios that are meant to both inform and guide districts and schools in their device readiness efforts. Districts and schools should strongly consider creating or revising their technology plans to meet the more rigorous ratios of 5:1, 3:1 or 1:1 if they plan to fully embrace feature-rich technology-based instructional materials and resources for students both in and out of the classroom. Ascension Parish should not discard devices just because they do not meet minimum or recommended testing hardware specifications. These computers could still support daily instructional needs within the classroom or school setting and/or be upgraded to support testing. Schools are encouraged to reexamine their computer inventory and determine where best to allocate computer resources based on instructional and testing needs. A school-level device-bydevice assessment is being provided in conjunction with this report to assist in this effort. The device assessment report can be obtained through your LDOE District Network Team. An example Device Assessment Report is provided on the following page. 5

Device Needs by School SiteCode SiteName Students Reported Student Testers devices PARCC minimum devices PARCC & Louisiana recommended available for testing minimum recommended Av D m m 3001 G. W. Carver Primary School 466 232 436 6 430 6 430 3002 Donaldsonville Primary School 437 0 316 7 308 7 308 3003 Donaldsonville High School 443 443 930 27 778 27 778 3004 Dutchtown Middle School 766 766 827 1 566 1 566 3005 East Ascension High School 1710 1710 1104 22 1080 22 1080 3006 Galvez Middle School 619 619 540 14 226 14 226 3007 Gonzales Middle School 630 630 435 28 403 28 403 3008 Gonzales Primary School 426 203 311 6 303 6 303 3010 Lowery Middle School 385 385 658 16 639 16 639 3011 Duplessis Primary School 642 332 366 14 317 14 317 3012 Prairieville Middle School 846 846 1160 40 670 40 670 3013 St. Amant Middle School 525 525 558 5 368 5 368 3014 St. Amant High School 1837 1837 1857 33 1821 33 1821 3015 Lowery Elementary School 397 397 486 30 318 30 318 3016 Dutchtown High School 1973 1973 818 10 783 10 783 3018 Galvez Primary School 555 293 308 22 286 22 286 3020 Lake Elementary School 956 645 962 89 864 89 864 3023 Dutchtown Primary School 752 390 377 5 372 5 372 6

ailability for testing was not reported Additional Needed for Testing (Minimum and Recommended ) Additional Needed for Testing (Recommended Only) evices eeting inimum recommended needed for testing (7:1) needed for testing (5:1) needed for testing (3:1) 7:1 5:1 3:1 7:1 5:1 3:1 1:1 Educational (Recommended Specs only) 0 0 33 46 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 89 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 153 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 244 342 570 0 0 0 0 0 0 630 0 0 88 124 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 393 0 0 90 126 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 227 0 0 29 41 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 77 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 66 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 121 169 282 0 0 0 0 0 0 176 0 0 75 105 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 157 0 0 262 367 612 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 57 79 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 0 282 395 658 0 0 0 0 0 0 1190 0 0 42 59 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 92 129 215 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 78 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 7

SiteCode SiteName Students Reported Student Testers devices PARCC minimum devices PARCC & Louisiana recommended available for testing minimum recommended Av D m mi s 3024 St. Amant Primary School 578 280 414 6 406 6 406 3025 Ascension Parish Alternative School 0 0 299 0 299 0 299 3026 Central Middle School 727 727 924 4 348 4 348 3027 Oak Grove Primary School 806 419 363 22 337 22 337 3029 Pecan Grove Primary School 444 215 279 3 276 3 276 3030 Prairieville Primary School 865 432 255 0 255 0 255 3031 Central Primary School 708 327 177 2 175 2 175 3032 Lakeside Primary School 609 304 190 0 188 0 188 3033 Spanish Lake Primary School 755 397 265 0 265 0 265 3034 Sorrento Primary School 461 228 152 0 152 0 152 20318 15555 15767 412 13233 412 13233 Sample Device Assessment - an electronic copy of each district s school level device-by-device report will be p orgcode Device Count ABC 28 Optiplex 780-FP ABC 2 Optiplex 780-FP ABC 8 Optiplex 780-FP Name Location Operating System Library Lab Room 101 Home Ec PARCC OS LA OS Device Processor Device Memory PARCC Memory LA Memory Screen Resolution PARCC Resolution windows_7 PASS PASS 4100 1024 PASS PASS 30 PASS win 3.1 FAIL FAIL 1100 512 FAIL FAIL 50 PASS windows_7 PASS PASS 4100 1024 PASS PASS 50 PASS 8

ailability for testing was not reported evices eeting nimum pecs recommended needed for testing (7:1) needed for testing (5:1) needed for testing (3:1) Additional Needed for Testing (Minimum and Recommended ) 7:1 5:1 3:1 Additional Needed for Testing (Recommended Only) 7:1 5:1 3:1 1:1 Educational (Recommended Specs only) 0 0 40 56 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 145 242 0 0 0 0 0 0 379 0 0 60 84 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 0 31 43 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 86 144 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 0 0 47 65 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 43 61 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 57 79 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 0 0 33 46 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 0 2222 3110 5184 0 0 0 0 0 0 4222 rovided to each district through their LDOE network team. LA Resolution Display Size PARCC Display LA Display Browser Wireless Device Type Testing Environment PASS 17 PASS PASS 30 FALSE desktop acceptable PASS 15 PASS PASS 40 FALSE desktop acceptable PASS 17 PASS PASS 30 FALSE desktop acceptable PARCC Environment LA Environment Owner DEVICE -- PARCC PASS/ FAIL DEVICE -- LA PASS/ FAIL PASS PASS School PASS PASS PASS PASS School FAIL FAIL PASS PASS School PASS PASS 9

10

Infrastructure: Broadband Internet, Network and Facilities Access to high-speed broadband and a reliable network backbone is now as vital a component of K-12 school infrastructure as electricity, air conditioning, and heating. Technology is transforming the learning environment from a closed prescribed static, paper-driven teaching model to a robust global anytime, anywhere rich platform. For students to experience and create engaging text, multimedia projects, conduct research, take online courses, and collaborate with students not only in their schools but in their district and the world, districts and schools must plan and implement sustainable and expandable technology infrastructures. Broadband Internet Readiness Minimum bandwidth requirements for PARCC online testing will be determined based on the final selection of the PARCC assessment delivery platform and the level of multimedia and technology enhanced items in the final assessment design. PARCC will provide minimum specifications by October 2013. Districts should plan for bandwidth needs to support both online testing and expanding instructional needs. Both PARCC and LDOE are modeling recommended specifications for Internet bandwidth based on those advanced by the State Educational Technology Directors Association in its May 2012 publication, The Broadband Imperative: Recommendations to Address K-12 Education Infrastructure Needs. Ascension Parish currently shares an average bandwidth of 78 Mbps of Internet bandwidth amongst its 28 schools. Based on the 2014-15 targets, the district will need a minimum of 2 Gbps of Internet bandwidth to meet minimum broadband access targets. Additionally, another 20.3 Gbps of Internet bandwidth will be needed by 2017-18. Please remember, these are just bandwidth estimates. More accurate estimates will be provided later this year. Network Readiness Minimum network requirements for PARCC online testing will be released by October 2013. Requirements will be dependent on the level of multimedia and technology enhanced items in the final assessment design. As districts plan for both testing and instructional needs, districts need to reassess their current local area networks (LAN) in the schools and their wide area network (WAN) connecting all of their schools to their central office and other campuses. Unlike past online End-of-Course tests, Internet & Network Recommendations Broadband Access for Teaching, Learning, and School Operations An external Internet connection to the Internet service provider (ISP) Internal wide area network (WAN) connections from the district to each school and among schools within the district 2014-15 School Year Target At least 100 Mbps per 1,000 students/ staff At least 1 Gbps per 1,000 students/staff 2017-18 School Year Target* At least 1 Gbps per 1,000 students/staff At least 10 Gbps per 1,000 students/staff PARCC assessments can be conducted over a wireless network if the network has been designed to handle a large volume of traffic and large quantity of connections. Specific details surrounding high density wireless infrastructures will be provided to districts to assist them in assessing their current status and for planning future upgrades and replacements. Currently, Ascension Parish s schools connect to the district WAN at 1 Gbps. Based on the recommended targets, the average school WAN connection should be a minimum 500 Mbps for 2014-15 and 5 Gbps for 2017-18 recommended targets. Facility Readiness Currently, PARCC states are not collecting data on facility readiness; however based on recent deliberations, future TRT collections may include questions relative to school facilities. In advance of this survey, districts should begin to assess their schools and note any concerns including, but not limited to space planning, furniture, wiring and power to accommodate testing. Districts should notify their LDOE network team support members if facility readiness issues are found. In addition to facility concerns, LDOE will be providing guidance in future footprints on secure testing environments. This guidance will provide best practices and practical solutions for districts to use when standard labs are not available. LDOE does not recommend that districts create new permanent labs that will be used solely for testing. Testing is just a small part of the school year; therefore, schools and the technology within schools should be designed and used for optimal learning. 11

As a school moves forward with technology and technology projects, their staffing needs change. Planning properly for these changes is crucial to a school s success. Staff Readiness Districts who properly plan, train and staff their testing support team will be better prepared to ensure testing security and success. Staffing requirements for both test monitoring and technical support have not been defined by PARCC as of its latest guideline release. Even without these recommendations, LDOE realizes that districts need some basic guidance to assist in planning for online assessments. Districts and schools should plan on having adequate staff who can serve in the following roles: test monitor/ proctor, school test coordinator, school technology coordinator, district test coordinator, and district technology coordinator. In addition to these staff, key district technical resources such as your network administrator, Internet service provider contact and desktop support administrators should also be both known and prepared to provide your school(s) support during testing windows. All staff who are assigned to support testing should be properly trained and appropriately staffed. Based on data that was self-reported by the schools in Ascension Parish, a mixed level of concern relative to technical assistance staffing levels and a mixed level of concern relative to information technology staffing levels. TRT data also report that schools have a mixed level of concern regarding current technical assistance staff s knowledge, mixed level of concern regarding current technical assistance staff s training, mixed level of concern regarding current IT staff s knowledge, mixed level of concern regarding current IT staff s training. See the charts on this page for more information. As districts develop staffing and training plans, districts should not forget to create internal reporting protocols for escalating technical problems during the testing windows. Until further guidance is provided, it is recommended that districts use the same protocols set forth for End-of- Course testing for PARCC testing (see graphic below). This will provide both the district and your schools with a familiar proven process for handling, reporting and managing testing issues and technical problems that could potentially arise. EOC Reporting Protocol Average Level of Staffing Concern Reported by Parish Schools Sufficient Technical Assistance (TA) Staff Sufficient Information Technology (IT) Staff Negligible Concern (1-3) Slight Concern (4-5) Moderate Concern (6-7) High Concern (8-10) Average Level of Training and Support Concerns Reported by Parish Schools TA s have sufficient technical knowledge TA s have sufficient training IT staff have sufficient technical knowledge IT staff have sufficient training Negligible Concern (1-3) Slight Concern (4-5) Moderate Concern (6-7) High Concern (8-10) 12

LDOE Support Options The Louisiana Department of Education (LDOE) is committed to supporting districts in achieving all of the technology readiness goals in all schools across the state. LDOE will continue to provide new and expanded technology support and services based on district needs and requests. Below is a list of the initial services and supports that the state would like to implement. Technology Assistance Teams (TAT) Technology Assistance Teams will be comprised of LEA staff members who are willing to serve in both an advisory and support capacity for developing and implementing technology policies and plans in both their district and across the state. This team will meet at a regular intervals to assist the state in determining its needs, direction and solutions for technology procurement, training, planning and funding requirements in the classroom. Technology Planning LDOE will be working with LEAs to develop technology plans for both the technology readiness goals and their district s educational goals. Through this process, LEAs will be able to properly budget and plan for new acquisitions, training, support, infrastructure, educational resources and platforms, distance learning networks, and other technology initiatives. In addition, to local LEA planning, the state will be working with LEAs to create, design and fund statewide technology initiatives in support of educational goals. State Contracts With information and guidance from TAT groups, the state will work to create statewide technology contracts and private partnerships which provide significant discounts and expanded services for LEAs and schools. The first contracts to be created have been laptop, desktop and tablet computers. As new products or services (e.g. computer software; computer peripherals, devices and support; network hardware and support; technology services; and telecommunication products and services) are created, LDOE will publish purchasing information and costs in the Connections Catalog. Infrastructure Design & Guidance Through LDOE s newly created TAT groups, the state will work to assist LEAs with additional resources for designing new or upgraded infrastructure designs to support technology goals. This will include, but is not limited to, bringing in private partners and other agencies to work collaboratively on creating the best design to meet the specific needs of a school and/or district based on its particular educational direction and services. This team will also provide training and support options that are tailored to the district needs. 13

LOUISIANA BELIEVES: Louisiana s Technology Footprint Louisiana Department of Education Email EdTech@la.gov www.louisianabelieves.com