MYP Assessment Policy

Similar documents
MYP personal project guide 2011 overview of objectives

EQuIP Review Feedback

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

What does Quality Look Like?

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

2nd Grade Media. Goal #1: Inquiry EO #1 - UBD

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

KIS MYP Humanities Research Journal

Presentation 4 23 May 2017 Erasmus+ LOAF Project, Vilnius, Lithuania Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland.

Assessment and Evaluation

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Sample Performance Assessment

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

The specific Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAP) addressed in this course are:

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

AIS KUWAIT. School Improvement Plan (SIP)

International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma. Source Material IBO Website, IB Handbook, Kristin School Auckland and a range of other relevant readings.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

Regions Of Georgia For 2nd Grade

PROFESSIONAL PATHWAYS. for TEACHERS. PPf T SUPPORT GUIDE

PROFESSIONAL PATHWAYS. for TEACHERS. PPf T SUPPORT GUIDE

Common Performance Task Data

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

School Leadership Rubrics

Concordia Language Villages STARTALK Teacher Program Curriculum

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

E C C. American Heart Association. Basic Life Support Instructor Course. Updated Written Exams. February 2016

BUS 4040, Communication Skills for Leaders Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits. Academic Integrity

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Strategies for Differentiating

Instructional Approach(s): The teacher should introduce the essential question and the standard that aligns to the essential question

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

Foothill College Summer 2016

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

TEACH 3: Engage Students at All Levels in Rigorous Work

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

4 th Grade Curriculum Essentials Document

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

Strategic Plan Dashboard

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

Market Economy Lesson Plan

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Turkey in the 20 th Century guide

eportfolios in K-12 and in Teacher Education

Quality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Creating a Test in Eduphoria! Aware

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Distinguished Teacher Review

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

21st Century Community Learning Center

Intensive Writing Class

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

ASCD Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind

Standards-Based Bulletin Boards. Tuesday, January 17, 2012 Principals Meeting

The newly revised NCSSFL-ACTFL Can-Do Statements offer language educators a

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Starting an Interim SBA

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

This table contains the extended descriptors for Active Learning on the Technology Integration Matrix (TIM).

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Topic: Making A Colorado Brochure Grade : 4 to adult An integrated lesson plan covering three sessions of approximately 50 minutes each.

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

Rubric For California Mission Project

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

Many instructors use a weighted total to calculate their grades. This lesson explains how to set up a weighted total using categories.

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

BERGEN ARTS AND SCIENCE CHARTER SCHOOL

North Miami Senior Project

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

MATH 1A: Calculus I Sec 01 Winter 2017 Room E31 MTWThF 8:30-9:20AM

Practice Learning Handbook

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

TIM: Table of Summary Descriptors This table contains the summary descriptors for each cell of the Technology Integration Matrix (TIM).

Norms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?

World Languages Unpacked Content for Classical Language Programs What is the purpose of this document?

STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Somerset Progressive School Planning, Assessment, Recording & Celebration Policy

College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer Science

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

FOUR STARS OUT OF FOUR

Transcription:

MYP Assessment Policy Statement of Philosophy that Supports Student Learning: We believe that essential objectives drive well-written assessments, which then guide instruction and measure student learning. Objective-driven assessments provide students the opportunity to self-reflect on their progress toward achievement on MYP assessment criteria. Students explore key and related concepts and the global contexts, which also allows them to receive rich feedback from their instructors. The assessment tasks, strategies, and tools are designed by teachers. We recognize both summative and formative assessments as being integral to the teaching and learning process. The purpose of the assessment policy is to communicate the school s expectations with regard to assessment tasks and to ensure the assessment process is transparent, equitable, and relevant. We believe that assessment must meet the individual needs of the learners and support the holistic nature of the MYP by taking into account the unique development of the whole student. We believe that assessment throughout our programme should be used to support student learning and achievement. Common Practices in writing MYP tasks Assessments measure the students mastery of IB objectives through the use of o Common assessments o Approaches to Learning skills o MYP assessment criteria for each subject group in all years of the programme Teachers provide clear learning targets to students and design assessments that are o Performances of understanding: authentic tasks as much as possible o Relevant and student- friendly, encouraging student buy-in o Made public and tied to learning objectives Teachers create assessments in order for o Students to demonstrate maximum learning o Students to frequently show their individual achievement o Students and teachers to gauge student progress toward mastery o Students to have differentiated assessment tasks to better take advantage of their learning strengths.

Teachers provide students with multiple opportunities to master objectives by o Providing feedback in a timely manner o Allowing students to revise work, when possible, according to rich, descriptive feedback o Allowing students to rework formative assessments if possible Teachers ask students to self-assess their learning because o It is critical that students have the opportunity to practice self-assessment and reflection to master this lifelong skill while still in school o Self-assessment promotes ownership in one s own education Common Practices in using MYP assessment criteria Rubrics and assessment tasks are developed, implemented and assessed collaboratively by MYP teachers with reference to both relevant MYP guides and subject group overviews. Teachers do the following in order to have common practices around determining achievement levels on IB rubrics: Use MYP subject group assessment criteria rubrics Provide exemplars and non-exemplars may be made available to students Clarify rubrics using student-friendly language Generate checklists and rubrics to support formative assessments within the Professional Learning Community (PLC) Write task-specific rubrics or make assessment tasks specific by using a task sheet or by sharing grading practices on specific assessments with students during a class discussion. Common Practices in determining achievement levels Teachers discuss how the command terms are used in the rubric. Teachers standardize grades by using time during PLCs to compare grading practices and agree on a common level for each summative task. In PLCs, teachers standardize their expectations for achievement by writing common assessments, using common rubrics and by discussing what they will be looking for in student work in order for a student to achieve at a certain level. Formative and Summative Assessments Multiple and varied assessments will be employed to evaluate student achievement. It is encouraged that teachers write performances of understanding using the Wiggins and McTighe

GRASPS method. These authentic tasks will provide opportunities for students to apply learned knowledge and skills to real-life situations. Examples of various assessments include: Student interviews Peer assessment Self-assessment Collaborative or individual projects Performances, demonstrations, or practical work Written assignments Unit exams Anecdotal records Verbal discussion/socratic seminar Individual and group work Open-ended tasks Laboratory activities Presentations using a variety of tools (Prezi, Powerpoint, GoogleDocs) and in a variety of ways (oral, written, graphic) Process journals Formative assessments will be ongoing throughout the programme using criteria related to the objectives. Formative assessment is a feature of all teaching and learning in the MYP programme and is vital to the learning process. Summative assessments contribute to the determination of the achievement level. This usually takes place at the end of the MYP unit of work or at the end of the quarter or semester. As students are assessed continually in the MYP, teachers will be able to determine a level of achievement during a learning period. In addition to creating our own assessment tasks, students are required to take CMAS (Colorado Measures of Academic Success) and PAARC (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers) tests as well as STAR (Standardized Testing and Reporting) tests. English Language Learners (ELL) are required to take ACCESS (Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State). Data from these tests are used to support many of our summative tasks.

Common practices in recording and reporting student achievement Teachers are using our district student information database, Infinite Campus, to record MYP grades. When reporting grades to parents: Evidence of learning will be shared with parents during conferences and on report cards each quarter at the middle school and each semester at the high school. Our report card contains letter grades as required by our district grading system. MYP assessment criteria scores are reported in Infinite Campus and parents can view those grades through the parent portal account. It is our goal that each criteria is being reported the prescribed minimum, with the hope that teachers are reporting more often in order to see a more complete picture of each student s development on the MYP criteria. MYP scores are recorded in a category that is unweighted. The scores are written as a whole number. Some teachers are choosing to dual report so the scores are entered in the un-weighted category and then are placed in the weighted portion of the gradebook, where they calculate as a percent. The score towards the quarter/semester grade entered is agreed upon by the PLC. This table shows what percent an MYP criterion level may reflect in a traditional gradebook. MYP 0 1 2 3-4 5-6 7-8 criteria score Percent in Student gradebook may have the option to redo the task 59% or 60-69% 70-84% 85-93% 94-100% below MYP grades will also be reported to parents during student and parent conferences. Student grades, assignments, and teacher comments can also be viewed 24-hours a day through the Infinite Campus parent and student portals. It is our hope to implement a 4 th quarter MYP report card using the general grade descriptors in the near future. Below is an image of our gradebook. Communicating our Assessment Policy The Assessment Policy, alongside the school s Academic Honesty, Special Needs and Language policies, will be communicated to all stakeholders. Policy documents will be made available on the school website for parents and community access, and distributed in printed form to all

staff members at the school site. School leadership and staff will review necessary aspects of each policy, as appropriate, with parents and students through orientation and school information events and publications. Additional printed copies will be made available for distribution to interested parties. Reviewing our Assessment Policy A committee, made up of school leadership and staff will be formed to review the policies. The policy will be reviewed and revised as needed and the communication of the changes will be presented to all stakeholders.