Assessment Decisions Policy and Appeals Procedure

Similar documents
POLICY ON THE ACCREDITATION OF PRIOR CERTIFICATED AND EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING

Directorate Children & Young People Policy Directive Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

Idsall External Examinations Policy

Sixth Form Admissions Procedure

Lismore Comprehensive School

Anglia Ruskin University Assessment Offences

Presentation Advice for your Professional Review

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

Qualification handbook

CERTIFICATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN CONTINUING EDUCATION. Relevant QAA subject benchmarking group:

Post-16 Level 1/Level 2 Diploma (Pilot)

Introduction 3. Outcomes of the Institutional audit 3. Institutional approach to quality enhancement 3

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Distinguished Teacher Review

Quality Assurance of Teaching, Learning and Assessment

WEST HATCH HIGH SCHOOL THE BEST THAT I CAN BE. Exams Policy

2. YOU AND YOUR ASSESSMENT PROCESS

POST-16 LEVEL 1 DIPLOMA (Pilot) Specification for teaching from September 2013

1. Apologies 2.1 Received Elin Royles, Alice Hodges, Steffan Jones 2.2 Agreed Glesni Davies agreed to take the minutes of the meeting

ASHMOLE ACADEMY. Admissions Appeals Booklet

May 2011 (Revised March 2016)

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

COURSE HANDBOOK 2016/17. Certificate of Higher Education in PSYCHOLOGY

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

LAW ON HIGH SCHOOL. C o n t e n t s

University of Exeter College of Humanities. Assessment Procedures 2010/11

Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech

P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning

INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

OCR LEVEL 3 CAMBRIDGE TECHNICAL

16-19 Bursary and Discretionary Fund Policy

COLLEGE OF INTEGRATED CHINESE MEDICINE ADMISSIONS POLICY

QUEEN ELIZABETH S SCHOOL

SOAS Student Disciplinary Procedure 2016/17

WOODBRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL

Examinations Officer Part-Time Term-Time 27.5 hours per week

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

1. Welcome and introduction from the Director of Undergraduate Studies

UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON LEAVE OF ABSENCE PROCEDURE

THREE-YEAR COURSES FASHION STYLING & CREATIVE DIRECTION Version 02

Practice Learning Handbook

MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY FACULTYOF EDUCATION THE SECONDARY EDUCATION TRAINING PARTNERSHIP MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Practice Learning Handbook

Intermediate Algebra

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools

Exclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy

UNIVERSITY OF DAR-ES-SALAAM OFFICE OF VICE CHANCELLOR-ACADEMIC DIRECTORATE OF POSTGRADUATE STUDIUES

SEN INFORMATION REPORT

Bullying Fact Sheet. [W]hen a school knows or should know of bullying conduct based on a student s

CARDIFF UNIVERSITY OF WALES UNITED KINGDOM. Christine Daniels 1. CONTEXT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALES AND OTHER SYSTEMS

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UWE UWE. Taught course. JACS code. Ongoing

MMU/MAN: MASINDE MULIRO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

University of Toronto

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014

Master in Science in Chemistry with Biomedicine - UMSH4CSCB

University of Essex NOVEMBER Institutional audit

Programme Specification (Postgraduate) Date amended: 25 Feb 2016

STUDENT AND ACADEMIC SERVICES

Joe Public ABC Company

Developing a Language for Assessing Creativity: a taxonomy to support student learning and assessment

LLB (Hons) Law with Business

School self-evaluabon summary report for school community

Assessment and Evaluation

School Complaints Policy

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

Level 6. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) Fee for 2017/18 is 9,250*

STUDENT HANDBOOK ACCA

Programme Specification

RUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review. Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage Review 1

Principles, theories and practices of learning and development

REGULATIONS RELATING TO ADMISSION, STUDIES AND EXAMINATION AT THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOUTHEAST NORWAY

EXAMINATIONS POLICY 2016/2017

Graduate Handbook Linguistics Program For Students Admitted Prior to Academic Year Academic year Last Revised March 16, 2015

MJC ASSOCIATE DEGREE NURSING MULTICRITERIA SCREENING PROCESS ADVISING RECORD (MSPAR) - Assembly Bill (AB) 548 (extension of AB 1559)

University of Suffolk. Using group work for learning, teaching and assessment: a guide for staff

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

London School of Economics and Political Science. Disciplinary Procedure for Students

COMMUNICATION AND JOURNALISM Introduction to Communication Spring 2010

ST PHILIP S CE PRIMARY SCHOOL. Staff Disciplinary Procedures Policy

American College of Emergency Physicians National Emergency Medicine Medical Student Award Nomination Form. Due Date: February 14, 2012

How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

BILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme

Earl of March SS Physical and Health Education Grade 11 Summative Project (15%)

REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -

Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

University of London International Programmes. Quality Assurance and Student Lifecycle Sub-Committee. Registration Dates

British International School Istanbul Academic Honesty Policy

An Analysis of the Early Assessment Program (EAP) Assessment for English

GradinG SyStem IE-SMU MBA

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ACCESS AGREEMENT

DIPLOMA IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE PROGRAMME

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

Transcription:

Welland Park Academy CENTRE NUMBER: 25341 Welland Park Academy Assessment Decisions Policy and Last Updated: October 2016

Contents Page Policy for assessment decisions Outline 1 2 Flow Chart 3

Welland Park Academy Under Section 2, paragraph 19 (ix) of the Joint Council Code of Practice, the Awarding Bodies require centres offering their examinations to: Have a published appeals procedure relating to the internal assessment decisions that contribute to summative assessment. Make this document available and accessible to candidates Our policy is designed to promote quality, consistency, accuracy and fairness in assessment and awarding. 1. The candidate will have produced work for internal assessment that has been authenticated as original work according to the Joint Council document issued in September to all examination candidates. 2. In September, all candidates are given written advice about the production of internally assessed work that contributes to summative assessment and deadlines to be met. 3. All candidates are given adequate and appropriate time to produce the required work. 4. Internal assessments are conducted by staff who have the appropriate knowledge, understanding and skills. 5. The consistency of the internal assessment is secured via a mark scheme or marking criteria and internal standardisation activities as necessary. 6. Each Awarding Body specifies detailed criteria for the internal assessment of the work and staff responsible for internal standardisation will attend any training sessions given by the Awarding Bodies. 7. The Awarding Body must moderate the assessed coursework and the final mark awarded is that of the Awarding Body. This mark is outside the control of the school and is not covered by this procedure. 1

1. The grounds for appeal relate only to the procedures used in arriving at internal assessment decisions or the production of externally assessed work and do not apply to the judgements themselves. 2. In the first instance the student should raise any concerns about their assessment decision with the teacher. 3. If the student remains concerned having spoken to their teacher they should contact their Tutor or a nominated person. 4. The tutor or nominated person will ask the student to make a written appeal which will be submitted to the Head of Department. The grounds for the appeal must be clearly stated. 5. On receipt of the written appeal the Head of Department will lead an enquiry to investigate the state concerns. The enquiry will be completed within 10 working days. On completion the written findings will be sent to the student. 6. If the student is satisfied with the findings no further action will be taken. However, if the student remains unsatisfied with the findings then a final appeal can be made. The appeal must be sent to the Principal (within a week of receiving the written findings). The grounds for the appeal must be clearly stated. Once received by the Principal an appeals panel will be convened within ten working days. 7. The final appeal will be considered by the Appeals Panel. The panel will consist of the Head of Department, the Principal and a member of the Quality Team. The candidate, who will be asked to attend, can be supported by a parent/carer or friend. 8. The panel will examine the evidence for the procedures used in the assessment, decide upon their appropriateness and that the procedures have been properly followed as required by the Awarding Body concerned. Written confirmation of the panel findings will be provided within three working days. 2

Inform the teacher that you will have concerns about an assessment decision. You are reassured by your teacher that the internal assessment procedures have been upheld. No further action is required. You remain concerned that the internal assessment procedures may not have been upheld. Inform your Tutor or a nominated person. An appeal should be made in writing to the Head of Department by your Tutor or a nominated person. On receipt of your written appeal the HoD will lead an enquiry. To be completed within 10 days. On completion the written findings of the enquiry are sent to you. You are satisfied with the findings/decision and no further action is required. You are not satisfied with the findings. A request for an appeals panel can be made in writing and sent to the School. Written confirmation for the panel s findings will be sent to you within 3 working days. Appeals Panel This is an opportunity for you to present your case to an appeals panel. CENTRE NUMBER: 25341 The Appeals Panel findings are final. 3