Instructional Technology Facilitator Summary Rating Form (Required)

Similar documents
PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALIST PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

State Parental Involvement Plan

MULTIPLE SUBJECT CREDENTIAL PROGRAM HANDBOOK. Preparing Educators to Be Effective Reflective Engaged

Course Specification Executive MBA via e-learning (MBUSP)

Standards for Professional Practice

School Leadership Rubrics

KAHNAWÀ: KE EDUCATION CENTER P.O BOX 1000 KAHNAW À:KE, QC J0L 1B0 Tel: Fax:

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal


Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Residency Principal and Program Administrator Internship and Certification Handbook

Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers

The 21st Century Principal

State: Original. Status: Planned July 2015-June. State: Original. Status: Planned. July 2015-June. State: Original. Status: Planned.

e-learning Coordinator

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Space Travel: Lesson 2: Researching your Destination

Santa Fe Community College Teacher Academy Student Guide 1

What does Quality Look Like?

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Qualification handbook

4a: Reflecting on Teaching

RDGED 722: Reading Specialist Practicum Field Experience Handbook

Teaching in a Specialist Area Unit Level: Unit Credit Value: 15 GLH: 50 AIM Awards Unit Code: GB1/4/EA/019 Unique Reference Y/503/5372

CONTRACT TENURED FACULTY

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Curriculum Development Manual: Academic Disciplines

TEACH WRITING WITH TECHNOLOGY

ÉCOLE MANACHABAN MIDDLE SCHOOL School Education Plan May, 2017 Year Three

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

Module Title: Teaching a Specialist Subject

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

First Nation, Métis and Inuit Education Annual Action Plan

TILE at Iowa: Adoption and Adaptation

Xenia High School Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Application

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Basic Standards for Residency Training in Internal Medicine. American Osteopathic Association and American College of Osteopathic Internists

Current Position Information (if applicable) Current Status: SPA (Salary Grade ) EPA New Position

John Long Middle School Chapter of the National Junior Honor Society

The Moodle and joule 2 Teacher Toolkit

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

Pharmaceutical Medicine

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Guide for Fieldwork Educators

eportfolio for Your Professional Teaching Practice

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

UNESCO Bangkok Asia-Pacific Programme of Education for All. Embracing Diversity: Toolkit for Creating Inclusive Learning-Friendly Environments

Systematic Assessment and Monitoring leading to Improving Quality of Education

1.1 Examining beliefs and assumptions Begin a conversation to clarify beliefs and assumptions about professional learning and change.

Guide to the University of Chicago, Phi Alpha Delta Law Fraternity Records

Educator s e-portfolio in the Modern University

VTCT Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Danielle Dodge and Paula Barnick first

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Department of Teaching and Learning

Using Moodle in ESOL Writing Classes

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

Spring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview

Garfield High School

BPS Information and Digital Literacy Goals

Upward Bound Program

PROFESSIONAL PATHWAYS. for TEACHERS. PPf T SUPPORT GUIDE

Writing an Effective Proposal for Teaching Grant: Focusing on Student Success & Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

PROFESSIONAL PATHWAYS. for TEACHERS. PPf T SUPPORT GUIDE

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLE WEB CONFERENCE OR ON-CAMPUS INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

Department of Education School of Education & Human Services Master of Education Policy Manual

Internship Program. Application Submission completed form to: Monica Mitry Membership and Volunteer Coordinator

Qualification Guidance

TIM: Table of Summary Descriptors This table contains the summary descriptors for each cell of the Technology Integration Matrix (TIM).

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

Engaging Faculty in Reform:

Supplemental Focus Guide

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

Transcription:

Instructional Technology Facilitator Summary Rating Form (Required) This form is to be jointly reviewed by the instructional technology facilitator and evaluator or designee during the Summary Evaluation Conference conducted at the end of the year. Name School Year School District Evaluator Evaluator s Title Date Completed 66

Standard I: Instructional technology facilitators demonstrate leadership. a. Instructional technology facilitators demonstrate 21st Century leadership in the school. b. Instructional technology facilitators lead an instructional technology program that supports 21st Century teaching and learning. c. Instructional technology facilitators advocate for effective instructional technology programs. d. Instructional technology facilitators promote and facilitate effective collaboration among educators within and beyond the school setting. e. Instructional technology facilitators demonstrate high ethical standards. Overall Rating for Standard I Professional development documentation Participation in professional learning communities Participation on school improvement team Opportunities for collaboration Needs assessments/surveys/benchmarks Aligned lesson plans Membership in instructional technology professional organizations, groups/forums Plan/procedure/calendar for equal access to technology resources Ethical and safe use of resource examples (student projects with resources, lesson plans, professional development) Documentation of conference presentations 67

Standard II: Instructional technology facilitators build a learning environment that meets the instructional needs of all students. a. Instructional technology facilitators establish a participatory learning environment that facilitates collaboration among all members of the learning community and honors diversity. b. Instructional technology facilitators seamlessly integrate content-area curricula with 21st Century content, effective pedagogical practices, universal design principles, and appropriate technology applications for all learners. Overall Rating for Standard II Documents written for listservs Technology fairs/nights Online course creation (Moodle, etc.) Participation in professional learning communities and other collaborative learning environments Lessons that are differentiated and apply a global perspective Documentation of holistic understanding of students over time Student interest inventories Student learning style assessments 68

Standard III: Instructional technology facilitators facilitate the implementation of a comprehensive 21st Century instructional technology program. a. Instructional technology facilitators serve as a specialist, fostering the effective use of digital tools and resources for constructing and sharing knowledge using inquiry-based instruction. Overall Rating for Standard III Minutes from professional learning community and school improvement team meetings Documentation of informal training and mentoring activities Lessons that use appropriate resources, tools, and skills to produce inquiry-based learning 69

North Carolina Instructional Technology Facilitator Evaluation Process a. Standard IV: Instructional technology facilitators demonstrate knowledge of learners and learning and promote effective instructional practices in a 21st Century learning environment. Instructional technology facilitators use effective pedagogy to infuse the curriculum with 21st Century content and tools. b. Instructional technology facilitators know the content appropriate to their teaching specialty. c. Instructional technology facilitators model, share, and promote effective principles of teaching and learning. Overall Rating for Standard IV Student-centered content Assessment data Usage data School Technology Plan Policies and Procedures Manual Collaboratively produced lesson and unit plans Professional development plans Minutes of professional/electronic learning community meetings Reflective journaling Blogs Articles written by instructional technology facilitator Listservs Newsletters Examples of lessons Leadership in adherence to local, state, and federal policies and laws related to digital safety Parent and student acceptable and responsible use policies 70

Standard V: Instructional technology facilitators actively reflect on their practice. a. Instructional technology facilitators analyze student learning. b. Instructional technology facilitators link professional growth to their professional goals. c. Instructional technology facilitators function effectively in a complex, dynamic environment. Overall Rating for Standard V Self-assessment Documentation of continuing education articles, conferences Feedback from supervisor, students, parents, community members, colleagues Professional development syllabi Professional Growth Plan Evaluation tool Student outcome data with data analysis Action research documentation Logs Memberships in professional organizations Formative and summative assessments Student and school needs assessments Members of school professional learning teams 71

Instructional Technology Facilitator Signature Date Evaluator Signature Date Note: The instructional technology facilitator s signature on this form neither represents acceptance nor approval of the report. It does, however, indicate that the instructional technology facilitator has reviewed the report with the evaluator and may reply in writing. The signature of the evaluator verifies that the report has been reviewed and that the proper process has been followed according to the North Carolina State Board of Education Policy for the Instructional Technology Facilitator Evaluation Process. 72