Texas Citizen Bee Competition

Similar documents
SCISA HIGH SCHOOL REGIONAL ACADEMIC QUIZ BOWL

WESTERN NATIONAL ROUNDUP LIVESTOCK QUIZ BOWL

MATHCOUNTS Rule Book LAST UPDATED. August NSBE JR. TOOLKIT National Programs Zone. 1

Detailed Information and Rules

Preparing for Permanent Residency and Citizenship

RAJASTHAN CENTRALIZED ADMISSIONS TO BACHELOR OF PHYSIOTHERAPY COURSE-2017 (RCA BPT-2017) INFORMATION BOOKLET

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS

Residential Admissions Procedure Manual

Science Olympiad Competition Model This! Event Guidelines

GradinG SyStem IE-SMU MBA

Legal Technicians: A Limited License to Practice Law Ellen Reed, King County Bar Association, Seattle, WA

Participation rules for the. Pegasus-AIAA Student Conference

How long did... Who did... Where was... When did... How did... Which did...

OVERVIEW OF THE WRITTEN EXAMINATION FOR PROSPECTIVE COURT INTERPRETERS

2018 Student Research Poster Competition

THE OHIO HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION

Supervision & Training

Graduate Student Grievance Procedures

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

ASHMOLE ACADEMY. Admissions Appeals Booklet

BEST OFFICIAL WORLD SCHOOLS DEBATE RULES

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

Math Hunt th November, Sodalitas de Mathematica St. Xavier s College, Maitighar Kathmandu, Nepal

To the Student: ABOUT THE EXAM

College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer Science

Department of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University

JUNIOR HIGH SPORTS MANUAL GRADES 7 & 8

MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REGULATIONS PURPOSE

Florida A&M University Graduate Policies and Procedures

NET-OLÉ Rules Committee Meeting Agenda. April 5, 2012

University of Massachusetts Amherst

ANNUAL REPORT. The South Australian Law Reform Institute. 1 January December 2012

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

NSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

ESSENTIAL SKILLS PROFILE BINGO CALLER/CHECKER

Sixth Form Admissions Procedure

BSW Student Performance Review Process

Preferred method of written communication: elearning Message

Imperial Avenue Holbrook High. Imperial Valley College. Political Science 102. American Government & Politics. Syllabus-Summer 2017

Administrative Services Manager Information Guide

Evaluation of Respondus LockDown Browser Online Training Program. Angela Wilson EDTECH August 4 th, 2013

HORSE EVALUATION CAREER DEVELOPMENT EVENT

Lyman, M. D. (2011). Criminal investigation: The art and the science (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Idsall External Examinations Policy

Master of Science in Taxation (M.S.T.) Program

Anthropology Graduate Student Handbook (revised 5/15)

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

22/07/10. Last amended. Date: 22 July Preamble

Instructions concerning the right to study

IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

How to Take Accurate Meeting Minutes

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Grade 2: Using a Number Line to Order and Compare Numbers Place Value Horizontal Content Strand

b) Allegation means information in any form forwarded to a Dean relating to possible Misconduct in Scholarly Activity.

INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

Loudoun Scholarship Application

Baker College Waiver Form Office Copy Secondary Teacher Preparation Mathematics / Social Studies Double Major Bachelor of Science

Promotion and Tenure Policy

SOUTHERN CONFERENCE 2016 Rules of Competition

Longman English Interactive

The University of Tennessee at Martin. Coffey Outstanding Teacher Award and Cunningham Outstanding Teacher / Scholar Award

Close Up. washington, Dc High School Programs

Measures of the Location of the Data

BY-LAWS of the Air Academy High School NATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY

Lymphedema Advocacy Group

INFORMATION BOOKLET. Refer RUHS website ( for updated and relevant information.

FIELD PLACEMENT PROGRAM: COURSE HANDBOOK

General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014

COURSE WEBSITE:

Tamwood Language Centre Policies Revision 12 November 2015

Close Up. washington & Williamsburg High School Programs

Practice Learning Handbook

Interpretive (seeing) Interpersonal (speaking and short phrases)

Last Editorial Change:

Feedback Form Results n=106 6/23/10 Emotionally Focused Therapy: Love as an Attachment Bond Presented By: Sue Johnson, Ed.D.

INTERNAL MEDICINE IN-TRAINING EXAMINATION (IM-ITE SM )

TOEIC Bridge Test Secure Program guidelines

The Louis Stokes Scholar Internship A Paid Summer Legal Experience

ARTICLE IV: STUDENT ACTIVITIES

Don t miss out on experiencing 4-H Camp this year!

Appendix L: Online Testing Highlights and Script

Focus Groups and Student Learning Assessment

New Jersey Society of Radiologic Technologists Annual Meeting & Registry Review

CONTRACT TENURED FACULTY

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Graduate Social Work Program Course Outline Spring 2014

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

Toronto District School Board

C2C Formal Telephone Discussion Ask the Contractor Teleconference

HIDDEN RULES FOR OFFICE HOURS W I L L I A M & M A R Y N E U R O D I V E R S I T Y I N I T I A T I V E

Transcription:

Competition Rules for the Texas Competition

RULES FOR THE COMPETITION ELIGIBILITY High school students in grades nine through twelve are eligible, with the exception of relatives of competition officials. For the 2017 competition, students may choose to attend the regional competition that is most convenient to them. However, NO STUDENT MAY COMPETE IN MORE THAN ONE REGIONAL COMPETITION, AND NO STUDENT COMPETITOR MAY OBSERVE OTHER REGIONAL COMPETITIONS. CONTENT Students prepare for all levels of competition by utilizing The Study Guide, www.citizenbee.org. This is the final authority for all written and oral questions at both the regional and state competitions. This website contains information on the following topics: The Constitution Documents People Landmark Supreme Court Cases Civic Values and Skills Current Events CURRENT EVENTS Citizen Bee questions in the Current Events category will be based on a number of sources. There are no Study Guide entries for this category. For the Texas Citizen Bee Regional Competition Current Events portion of the Bee, study the following: * National and world headline news stories from September 1, 2016 through February 15, 2017 * Major actions of Congress from September 1, 2016 to February 15, 2017 * Newsworthy stories related to the President of the United States * The two U.S. Senators from Texas * Current Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court * Major U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 2015-2016 term of the Court and upcoming cases from the 2016-2017 term of the Court * Names of the heads of the big four Cabinet departments: State, Defense, Justice, and Treasury. * Major stories concerning the big four Cabinet departments * Major leaders in both houses of the U.S. Congress for 2016 and 2017 * National and Texas elections and politics for 2016 and 2017 * COMPETITIONS School Level (see the rules for the Regional Level to determine if a school level competition is necessary) The school coordinator can use any activity to determine the three school representatives and one alternate to the regional competition. Regional Level The regional coordinator will determine the date and site for the regional contest. In order to build the competition, the regional coordinator can increase the number of contestants from each school as long as the total number of students participating at the regional contest does not exceed fifty. State Level Only the first place student will advance to the state competition. If a region does not have a competition, the region with the largest number of contestants will be notified and allowed to send their second place student. However, they will not be notified until after all regional contests have been held.

The written test and questions for the oral rounds will be provided to the Regional Coordinators by the Law-Related Education Department. All regional participants compete on a multiple choice test administered by the contest proctor. This proctor will not be allowed to have contestants participating in the Citizen Bee competition. They have a total of thirty minutes to complete the exam. The proctor can admit late arrivals to the written exam, but must collect their papers at the same time as the other students. Students who arrive late may not make up missed time. Students may see their multiple choice test as long as they are supervised by the proctor. Students will not be allowed to take the test from the competition site. All students then participate in four oral rounds. One round focuses on current events questions, while the other three rounds are based on material in The Study Guide. Students have 60 seconds to give a substantive answer. Time starts as soon as the question has been read. Contestants may request that the moderator re-read all or part of a question or spell a word, but this is part of the 60 seconds. Students must listen carefully to the oral questions. If the moderator only asks for the last name of a person and an incorrect first name is given, the answer is incorrect. For Section III: Landmark Cases & Civic Values, you must include BOTH parties in your answer. For example, if your answer is Texas v. Johnson, Texas will not be a correct response, and neither will Johnson. You MUST answer Texas v. Johnson to be correct. Students must speak loudly and clearly into the microphone. Judges CANNOT ask students to repeat or clarify an answer. I don t know is an acceptable answer. During the oral rounds, if a student must leave the stage area for any reason, he or she must see the competition coordinator. There is to be NO TALKING OTHER THAN INTO THE MICROPHONE WHEN ANSWERING A QUESTION DURING THE ORAL ROUNDS. Appeals: See Appeal for the Oral Round at Regional and State Level Competitions on last page. Students wishing to appeal judgments during oral rounds must strictly adhere to this procedure. NO REFERENCE MATERIAL OR ELECTRONIC RETREVAL SYSTEMS MAY BE USED DURING THE WRITTEN AND ORAL ROUNDS OF THE COMPETITION. Competition Winners: The winners will receive the State Competition Winner Information Forms at the awards ceremony directly following the event. Winners must fill in the requested information and return it to the competition coordinator before leaving the ceremony. Audio/Video Taping and Pictures. No audio or video taping or still pictures will be allowed during regional or state competitions, with the exception of taping done and pictures taken by competition organizers.

STATE LEVEL OF COMPETITION All state finals participants compete on a multiple choice test. Answers will be entered on a provided answer sheet. Students have a total of thirty minutes to complete the exam. The proctor can admit late arrivals to the written exam but must collect their papers at the same time as the other students. Students who arrive late may not make up missed time. Students may see their multiple choice test as long as they are supervised by the proctor. Students will not be allowed to take the test from the competition site. All students then participate in four oral rounds. One round focuses on current events questions, while the other three rounds are based on material in The Study Guide. Students have 60 seconds to give a substantive answer. Time starts as soon as the question has been read. Contestants may request that the moderator re-read all or part of a question or spell a word, but this is part of the 60 seconds. At the end of the recognition ceremony at the State Finals, the top four students will ascend to the final round, called the Civic Conversation. These students will make opening statements in response to a question, and then engage in a thirty-minute roundtable-style discussion. Opening statements and discussion will be based on four specified documents which will be sent to all state competitors prior to the competition. Tiebreakers for Both The Regional and State Competition The judges and scorekeeper use the following procedures to resolve ties in award -winning places, or to determine who advances to the next level of the competition: Step 1 Overall Written The student with the higher score in the overall written component is declared the winner. If the tie remains, proceed to Step 2. Step 2 Section 4 The student with the higher score in Section 4 of the written component, which contains more complex questions, is declared the winner. If a tie remains, the judges proceed to Step 3. Step 3 Section 3 The student with the higher score in Section 3 of the written component, which contains more complex questions, is declared the winner. If a tie remains, the judges proceed to Step 4. Step 4 Co-winners In the unlikely event that a tie is unresolved, the prizes are added together and divided between the tied students. For example, in a tie between the first and second place winners where the first place winner receives $100 and the second place winner receives $50, each receives $75. In a case where advancement to the next level is involved, both are declared first-place winners and both students advance.

Appeal Procedure for the Oral Round at the Regional and State Level Competitions For an appeal based on an oral question. Only a contestant may lodge an appeal, and only on an answer he or she has given. Appeals must be filed with the appeal judge before the contestant receives his or her next question. Contestants forfeit their right to appeal if they do not proceed directly to the designated appeal area from their seat or the stage, or if they communicate with anyone prior to filing the appeal. Contestants complete an appeal form and give it to the appeal judge. The appeal judge decides whether an oral appeal warrants review by the panel of three judges. If the appeal is denied, the form is returned to the contestant with an explanation. If the appeal warrants review, it is presented to the panel of voting judges. The contestant remains in the appeal area until the judges reach a decision. During the oral rounds, the judges call a time-out to discuss an appeal. The judges decide the outcome of an appeal before the affected contestant's next turn in the following round. Appeals based on the written component are not allowed. Students will be allowed to review their written test to ensure that it was graded correctly and to note the correct answers before the end of the competition. Judges The Texas Citizen Bee organizing group or regional competition coordinator selects judges for the regional and state competitions. Disqualification If, at any point, a student is disruptive, exhibits unsportsmanlike conduct, or is coached from the audience, that student is immediately disqualified from the competition by the competition coordinator. Late Arrivals Students who arrive after the written component begins may take the written test, but must turn in their papers at the same time as the other students. They will not be allowed to make up the lost time. Factual Errors Challenges concerning the accuracy of any material in The Study Guide must be filed in writing with the State Bar of Texas by February 1 st of the year of the competition.

STUDENT: Complete the appropriate section of this form and return it to the Competition Coordinator. It is your responsibility to clearly and concisely explain why you feel the appeal should be considered. You cannot clarify or change your answer; the judges are instructed to make a decision on your first response. Use the back of this form if needed. Student s Name: APPEALS FORM FOR COMPETITION Question under appeal: Basis for appeal: APPEAL JUDGE; Complete this section. If the appeal warrants, hand this form to the judges. If the appeal is denied, please provide a brief explanation in the space below and return the form to the competition coordinator. Please check the appropriate space: Appeal was given to judges. Appeal was NOT given to judges. JUDGES: If the appeal is granted, notify the moderator and scorekeeper. If the appeal is denied, please provide a brief explanation in the space below and return the form to the competition coordinator. Allowed Disallowed Briefly explain reason: