Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) January 2013

Similar documents
ELA/Literacy Shifts Flip

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Smarter Balanced Assessment System

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Developing, Supporting, and Sustaining Future Ready Learning

Welcome to the session on ACCUPLACER Policy Development. This session will touch upon common policy decisions an institution may encounter during the

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

Parent Academy. Common Core & PARCC

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

EQuIP Review Feedback

Why OUT-OF-LEVEL Testing? 2017 CTY Johns Hopkins University

An Analysis of the Early Assessment Program (EAP) Assessment for English

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

2015 correlated to the Instructional Materials Evaluation Toolkit (IMET): Grade 6

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

Teacher Development to Support English Language Learners in the Context of Common Core State Standards

NC Global-Ready Schools

success. It will place emphasis on:

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

ONLINE COURSES. Flexibility to Meet Middle and High School Students at Their Point of Need

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

This table contains the extended descriptors for Active Learning on the Technology Integration Matrix (TIM).

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Integrating Common Core Standards and CASAS Content Standards: Improving Instruction and Adult Learner Outcomes

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

TIM: Table of Summary Descriptors This table contains the summary descriptors for each cell of the Technology Integration Matrix (TIM).

Top Ten: Transitioning English Language Arts Assessments

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Common Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Sample Performance Assessment

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

ESL Curriculum and Assessment

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Harriet Beecher Stowe Elementary School

How do we balance statistical evidence with expert judgement when aligning tests to the CEFR?

Practice Learning Handbook

EAP. updates KHENG WAICHE. early proficiency programs coordinator

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

UDL AND LANGUAGE ARTS LESSON OVERVIEW

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Testing Schedule. Explained

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

NCSC Alternate Assessments and Instructional Materials Based on Common Core State Standards

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

What are some common test misuses?

California State University EAP Updates 2016

Language Center. Course Catalog

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

CUNY ASSESSMENT TESTS Webinar for International Students

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

FIELD PLACEMENT PROGRAM: COURSE HANDBOOK

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Practice Learning Handbook

Introduce yourself. Change the name out and put your information here.

Vertical Teaming. in a small school

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Executive Summary. Vicenza Elementary School

Assessing student understanding in the molecular life sciences using a concept inventory

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

MSc Education and Training for Development

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

ANNUAL REPORT of the ACM Education Policy Committee For the Period: July 1, June 30, 2016 Submitted by Jeffrey Forbes, Chair

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

A Diagnostic Tool for Taking your Program s Pulse

The 21st Century Principal

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

SY School Performance Plan

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

Transcription:

Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) January 2013

2 Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)

Assessment Design English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics, Grades 3-11 2 Optional Assessments/Flexible Administration Diagnostic Assessment Early indicator of student knowledge and skills to inform instruction, supports, and PD Non-summative Mid-Year Assessment Performance-based Emphasis on hardto-measure standards Potentially summative Performance-Based Assessment (PBA) Extended tasks Applications of concepts and skills Required End-of-Year Assessment Innovative, computer-based items Required Speaking And Listening Assessment Locally scored Non-summative, required 3

Non-Summative Assessment Components Flexible 4 Early Assessment Early indicator of student knowledge and skills to inform instruction, supports, and PD Summative assessment for accountability Mid-Year Assessment Performance-based Emphasis on hard to measure standards Potentially summative Non-Summative assessment Diagnostic Assessment designed to be an indicator of student knowledge and skills so that instruction, supports and professional development can be tailored to meet student needs Mid-Year Assessment comprised of performance-based items and tasks, with an emphasis on hard-to-measure standards. After study, individual states may consider including as a summative component

Summative Assessment Components Performance-Based Assessment (PBA) administered as close to the end of the school year as possible. The ELA/literacy PBA will focus on writing effectively when analyzing text. The mathematics PBA will focus on applying skills, concepts, and understandings to solve multi-step problems requiring abstract reasoning, precision, perseverance, and strategic use of tools Performance-Based Assessment (PBA) Extended tasks Applications of concepts and skills End-of-Year Assessment Innovative, computerbased items End-of-Year Assessment (EOY) administered after approx. 90% of the school year. The ELA/literacy EOY will focus on reading comprehension. The math EOY will be comprised of innovative, machine-scorable items 5 Summative assessment for accountability Non-Summative assessment

Shifts in the CCSS Call for Critical Advances in Assessment Quality In ELA/Literacy: Texts worth reading: PARCC will use authentic texts worthy of study instead of artificially produced or commissioned passages. Questions worth answering: Sequences of questions that draw students into deeper encounters with texts will be the norm, rather than sets of random questions of varying quality. In Mathematics: Problems worth doing: Multi-step problems, conceptual questions, applications, and substantial procedures will be common. Focus: PARCC assessments will have a strong focus where the standards focus to reinforce the concept of going deep rather than simply "covering topics."

Three Innovative Item Types That Showcase Students Command of Evidence with Complex Texts Evidence-Based Selected Response (EBSR) Combines a traditional selectedresponse question with a second selected-response question that asks students to show evidence from the text that supports the answer they provided to the first question. Underscores the importance of Reading Anchor Standard 1 for implementation of the CCSS. Technology-Enhanced Constructed Response (TECR) Uses technology to capture student comprehension of texts in authentic ways that have been difficult to score by machine for large scale assessments (e.g., drag and drop, cut and paste, shade text, move items to show relationships). Range of Prose Constructed Responses (PCR) Elicits evidence that students have understood a text or texts they have read and can communicate that understanding well both in terms of written expression and knowledge of language and conventions. There are four of these items of varying types on each annual performance-based assessment. 7

Overview of Mathematics Task Types PARCC mathematics assessments will include three types of tasks. 8 Task Type I. Tasks assessing concepts, skills and procedures II. Tasks assessing expressing mathematical reasoning III. Tasks assessing modeling / applications Description of Task Type Balance of conceptual understanding, fluency, and application Can involve any or all mathematical practice standards Machine scorable including innovative, computer-based formats Will appear on the End of Year and Performance Based Assessment components Each task calls for written arguments / justifications, critique of reasoning, or precision in mathematical statements (MP.3, 6). Can involve other mathematical practice standards May include a mix of machine scored and hand scored responses Included on the Performance Based Assessment component Each task calls for modeling/application in a real-world context or scenario (MP.4) Can involve other mathematical practice standards. May include a mix of machine scored and hand scored responses Included on the Performance Based Assessment component For more information see PARCC Item Development ITN Appendix D.

Build a Pathway to College and Career Readiness for All Students Timely student achievement data showing students, parents and educators whether ALL students are ontrack to college and career readiness College readiness score to identify who is ready for college-level coursework Targeted interventions & supports: 12 th -grade bridge courses PD for educators 3-8 High School SUCCESS IN FIRST-YEAR, CREDIT-BEARING, POSTSECONDARY COURSEWORK ONGOING STUDENT SUPPORTS/INTERVENTIONS 9

Advance Accountability at All Levels PARCC assessments will be purposefully designed to generate valid, reliable and timely data, including measures of growth, for various accountability uses including: School and district effectiveness Educator effectiveness Student placement into college-credit bearing courses Comparisons with other states 10

21 st Century, Technology-Based Assessments 11 PARCC s assessment will be computer-based and leverage technology in a range of ways: Item Development Develop innovative tasks that engage students in the assessment process Administration Reduce paperwork, increase security, reduce shipping/receiving & storage Increase access to and provision of accommodations for SWDs and ELLs Scoring Make scoring more efficient by combining human and automated approaches Reporting Produce timely reports of students performance throughout the year to inform instruction, interventions, and professional development

Timeline Through First PARCC Administration in 2014-2015 PARCC Tools & Resources Summative PARCC Assessments (2014-15 SY) Spring 2013 Summer 2013 Fall 2013 Winter 2014 Spring 2014 Spring 2015 Pilot/field testing begins Expanded field testing Standard Setting in Summer 2015 PARCC Assessment Implementation 12

What s New Item Development Item Tryout and Field Test Performance Level Descriptors Technology Guidelines for PARCC Assessments

General Definition of Each Level Level 5: Distinguished command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the CCSS assessed at the grade level/ course. Level 4: Strong command Level 3: Moderate command Level 2: Partial command Level 1: Minimal command 14

PLDs for Reporting Results of Assessments used to make College-Ready Determinations Level 5 Distinguished command of the knowledge and skills contained in the CCSS assessed Academically well prepared to engage successfully in entry-level credit bearing courses in.. Exempt from having to take and pass placement tests designed to determine whether they are prepared for entry-level, credit bearing courses without need for remediation Level 4 Strong command Academically prepared Exempt Level 3 Moderate command Will likely need academic support to engage successfully in entry-level, credit-bearing courses Not exempt Level 2 Partial command Will need academic support Not exempt Level 1 Minimal command Will need extensive academic support Not exempt

PLDs for Reporting Results of End-of-Grade Assessments for Grades 3-8 Level 5 Distinguished command Academically well prepared to engage successfully in further studies in the content area Level 4 Strong command Academically prepared Level 3 Moderate command Will likely need academic support to engage successfully Level 2 Partial command Will need academic support Level 1 Minimal command Will need extensive academic support

Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers Sign up for PARCC Place Newsletter and Updates at www.parcconline.org Jeffrey.hauger@doe.state.nj.us