SCHOOL REVIEW EXTERNAL PANEL TERMS OF REFERENCE

Similar documents
BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Proposal for the Educational Research Association: An Initiative of the Instructional Development Unit, St. Augustine

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Procedure - Higher Education

University of Toronto

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

Australia s tertiary education sector

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

UNIVERSITY OF DERBY JOB DESCRIPTION. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. JOB NUMBER SALARY to per annum

Programme Specification

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Pattern of Administration, Department of Art. Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

Minutes of the one hundred and thirty-eighth meeting of the Accreditation Committee held on Tuesday 2 December 2014.

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Hamline University. College of Liberal Arts POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Quality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -

Recognition of Prior Learning

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

ANNUAL SCHOOL REPORT SEDA COLLEGE SUITE 1, REDFERN ST., REDFERN, NSW 2016

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Associate Professor of Electrical Power Systems Engineering (CAE17/06RA) School of Creative Arts and Engineering / Engineering

CAUL Principles and Guidelines for Library Services to Onshore Students at Remote Campuses to Support Teaching and Learning

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Teaching Excellence Framework

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

University of Essex Access Agreement

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

Program Change Proposal:

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

2016 School Performance Information

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech

CARDIFF UNIVERSITY OF WALES UNITED KINGDOM. Christine Daniels 1. CONTEXT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALES AND OTHER SYSTEMS

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

Accreditation of Prior Experiential and Certificated Learning (APECL) Guidance for Applicants/Students

Programme Specification

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Promotion and Tenure standards for the Digital Art & Design Program 1 (DAAD) 2

CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS

Casual, approximately 8 hours per week. Director, CLIPP. Employee Name Signature Date

The Netherlands. Jeroen Huisman. Introduction

Report of External Evaluation and Review

Institutional review. University of Wales, Newport. November 2010

Rules and Regulations of Doctoral Studies

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Survey of Formal Education

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

Academic Program Assessment Prior to Implementation (Policy and Procedures)

NATIONAL UNIVERSITIES COMMISSION SOCIAL SCIENCES

Art Department Bylaws and Policies Approved 4/24/02

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Community engagement toolkit for planning

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

Programme Specification

Guidance on the University Health and Safety Management System

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire

Master of Philosophy. 1 Rules. 2 Guidelines. 3 Definitions. 4 Academic standing

St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School

LIBRARY AND RECORDS AND ARCHIVES SERVICES STRATEGIC PLAN 2016 to 2020

1st4sport Level 3 Award in Education & Training

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

CERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

HDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 Version: 2.01

LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY Department of Electrical Engineering Job Description

GENERAL INFORMATION STUDIES DEGREE PROGRAMME PERIOD OF EXECUTION SCOPE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE OF STUDY CODE DEGREE

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

State Parental Involvement Plan

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Transcription:

SCHOOL REVIEW EXTERNAL PANEL TERMS OF REFERENCE Contents 1 ESTABLISHMENT... 1 2 FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES... 1 3 REFERRAL OF MATTERS... 2 4 MEMBERSHIP AND TERMS OF OFFICE... 2 5 RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE AND DEBATE... 3 6 CHAIR... 3 7 SECRETARY... 3 8 QUORUM... 3 9 CONFLICT OF INTEREST... 3 10 MEETINGS... 3 11 ACCESS TO RESOURCES... 3 12 REVIEW DOCUMENTATION... 3 13 FEEDBACK... 3 14 APPROVAL AND REVIEW DETAILS... 4 15 Appendix A Self-review report... 5 1 ESTABLISHMENT An external review panel (hereafter the panel ) is established for each review of a school and will provide a report based on its review to Academic Board. 2 FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES The panel s functions and responsibilities are to undertake comprehensive reviews of schools in the Tertiary Education Division in accordance with these terms of reference. These reviews will: 2.1 be undertaken in the context of CQUniversity as a whole, with a focus on the school s current performance and capacity to meet the University s strategic and future needs. 2.2 be undertaken in relation to each school every five years or at the Provost s discretion. 2.3 seek to: a) examine the performance and future plans of the school, and any improvements made since its previous review b) benchmark the school s current structures, activities, data and performance, nationally and internationally wherever possible c) identify potential opportunities and make recommendations on the school s future direction including but not limited to strategic alignment and compliance with CQUniversity s requirements, and d) review the school s leadership and planning, including budget, people, culture and overall management. 2.4 focus on the following areas: a) management and governance, including academic leadership, workforce profiles, professional accreditation requirements, planning and budget management, space and facilities, and the use of feedback from employees and students for continuous improvement Reference Number/Code: 3016 Page 1 of 7

b) learning and teaching, including: student success: enrolment trends, attrition rates, completion rates and times, pass rates and student grades, and student satisfaction, by delivery location the efficacy of the school s activities promoting, monitoring and assuring academic employee learning and teaching and discipline scholarship, and the management of professional accreditation activities c) research, including publications, income, student load and completions, collaborations and ERA0F1 outcomes d) engagement and social innovation, including employee awards, engagement with relevant external organisations, alumni-related activities, recruitment, promotional and outreach activities, and externallyfunded scholarships and prizes e) the school s performance in learning and teaching, research, engagement and service will be analysed in the context of current and anticipated future developments in its constituent disciplines. 2.5 consider school self-review reports, which are expected to include data and information as outlined in Appendix A Self-review report, be informed by interviews with relevant stakeholders, and take into account CQUniversity s resources, vision and strategic goals. 2.6 adopt a review methodology that includes: a) focus on standards, evidence and outcomes b) benchmarking of current structures, activities and performance of schools against appropriate comparable organisations c) external referencing student success in each school s courses against comparable courses and/or fields of education, and d) evaluation of future opportunities in the context of CQUniversity s strategic goals, resources and planning activities, and internal and external opportunities. 2.7 result in a draft report based on the panel s review findings that will include commendations, recommendations and affirmations. The panel will submit its report to the Dean of School and Provost within one month of completing the review to allow for comment on errors of fact or emphasis, after which the Dean of School will submit the final report and an action plan to address the recommendations to Academic Board within one month, or a timeframe as approved by the Provost. 3 REFERRAL OF MATTERS The panel may refer any item to the Provost for discussion, consideration and/or action, and may refer relevant matters for action or noting to other committees or officers as appropriate. 4 MEMBERSHIP AND TERMS OF OFFICE The overall composition of the panel should aim to provide as broad a coverage as possible of all major disciplines in the school. The panel s membership will comprise: at least three, not more than four, external members with nationally/internationally recognised expertise from relevant disciplines or professional fields one CQUniversity Dean of School from a different discipline, and where applicable, at least one, not more than two, representatives of the relevant professions or employer groups. 1 ERA means Excellence in Research Australia (Australia s national research evaluation framework). Reference Number/Code: 3016 Page 2 of 7

The term of office for panel members will be the duration of the review process, concluding with the panel s submission of its final report of review findings. 5 RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE AND DEBATE The panel may extend rights of audience and debate. 6 CHAIR The Provost will appoint the Chair, who will be one of the panel members. 7 SECRETARY The Provost will nominate the Secretary. 8 QUORUM The quorum for a panel meeting is defined as 100% of the membership. Where a loss of quorum is identified, the meeting may be adjourned until a time the Chair determines. 9 CONFLICT OF INTEREST Panel members are required to declare to the Chair any real, perceived or potential conflict of interest they may have with any item on the panel s agenda. If the Chair or panel deems a member to have a conflict of interest in a matter before the panel, the member will be excused from panel s discussions and deliberations on that matter. Further details on identifying and dealing with a conflict of interest are provided in the Conflict of Interest Policy and Procedure. 10 MEETINGS Panel meetings may be held face-to face, by telephone, videoconference, or other electronic means. Panel members are required to fully prepare for each meeting, read the documentation in advance, and to make every reasonable effort to attend each meeting. 11 ACCESS TO RESOURCES Panel members will be provided with access to any resources reasonably required to fulfil their duties as a panel member. 12 REVIEW DOCUMENTATION Documentation will be distributed to panel members 2.5 weeks before the review, via email or hard copy. Panel records are subject to the Queensland Public Records Act 2002 and must be retained by the Secretary in accordance with the University s Records Management Policy and Procedure. Responsibility for ensuring appropriate records management for the panel rests with the Secretary under the direction of the panel s Chair. 13 FEEDBACK University staff and students may provide feedback about this document by emailing policy@cqu.edu.au. Reference Number/Code: 3016 Page 3 of 7

14 APPROVAL AND REVIEW DETAILS Approval and Review Details Approval Authority Learning and Teaching Committee Advisory Committee to Approval Authority N/A Administrator Provost Next Review Date 14/11/2020 Approval and Amendment History Details Original Approval Authority and Date Academic Board 29/03/2017 Amendment Authority and Date Learning and Teaching Committee 14/11/2018 Notes This document was formerly known as the Review of Schools by External Review Panel Terms of Reference (29/03/2017). This document replaced the External Review Panel Membership for the Review of Schools and Academic Units Terms of Reference (12/08/2015). Reference Number/Code: 3016 Page 4 of 7

15 Appendix A Self-review report It is recommended that the self-review report includes data and information on the following (where applicable): 1. Executive Summary 2. Management and Governance The overview of the school s management and governance will include comment on the following aspects in relation to the previous 12 months and into the future: the school s academic governance arrangements, including committee roles, student participation on committees, internal quality assurance, risk management, and compliance measures suitability of the school s workforce profile (level, qualifications, employee workload) and for units taught and student to employee ratios workforce matters including employee recruitment planning and retention, culture, and an overview of the school s performance review process professional accreditation requirements of courses offered by the school, including details of the oversight, management and current status of courses with professional accreditation, with particular regard to professional practice accreditation planning and budget management in relation to the past 12 months and into the future suitability of the school s physical resources (e.g. space, information technology infrastructure) the school s contribution to Indigenous engagement in curriculum and employment feedback from students, employees and other stakeholders; the management of complaints or grievances from students or employees; and the effectiveness of student and employee support mechanisms effectiveness of vocational education and training (VET) higher education integration operations review and improvement activities aligned with the Higher Education Standards Framework (HESF) and Registered Training Organisation (RTO) Standards requirements. 3. Learning and Teaching Analysis of the school s learning and teaching performance will include: a brief overview of the strategic context of learning and teaching within the school effectiveness of learning and teaching governance, including consideration of course committee, course reference committee and discipline meeting minutes reviewing learning and teaching leadership, including the school s planning and priorities, and course and unit management reviewing learning and teaching outcomes, including previous school reviews, course reviews, unit feedback, professional accreditation of courses, student experience, graduate outcomes, QILT 1F2 data, and employee feedback reviewing learning and teaching performance, including enrolments, retention/attrition, completions and completion times, pass rates and student grades, student experience, graduate outcomes, employee feedback and Learning and Teaching Grant outcomes comparing learning and teaching performance across campuses and study centres/hubs alignment with the HESF and RTO Standards requirements. Data on enrolment trends, attrition rates, pass rates and grades, completion rates and times, student and graduate satisfaction by course can be included at the end of the report as appendices. The appendices will not count towards the 50 page report limit. 2 QILT means Quality Indicators in Learning and Teaching (QILT website). Reference Number/Code: 3016 Page 5 of 7

4. Research Analysis of the school s research performance will include, but not necessarily be limited to: the strategic planning to decide support the school s research focus areas the school s research governance the school s support of its research institutes and centres, and their engagement with the school s research focus areas research output achievements and their contribution to CQUniversity s research key performance indicators in the following areas: - research publications, including citation data - research excellence (e.g. ERA outcomes) - research income generated by the school, by HERDC2F3 category - research higher degree student load and completions, by course (separated into high-cost and lowcost), domestic or fee-paying and Indigenous candidates - research collaborations locally, nationally, and internationally Research outcome achievements including: - evidence of research impact (social, economic, environmental, cultural changes beyond academia) - research awards, prizes, other achievements alignment with HESF requirements, including Category Standards requirements regarding research and scholarly activity. 5. Engagement and Social Innovation Engagement and social innovation should be evident throughout the school s learning and teaching, research and innovation, and service activities, with a clear link to their strategic or operational objectives. These activities should also align with HESF requirements for universities (see Category Standards). Engagement activities included in the report should involve mutually beneficial partnerships or collaborations between school employees and internal as well as external stakeholders. These activities should be evidenced through a report produced from CQUniversity s engagement database, E-DNA, and may include, as an example: an employee serving on an external organisation s board or committee personnel from an external organisation being involved in the school or unit s activities, including serving on advisory committees mutually beneficial relationships with professional accrediting organisations and government agencies, business, or industry social innovation projects alumni-related activities outreach activities. 6. Academic and teaching employee scholarly/vocational currency activity: school activities to promote and support teaching skills in contemporary teaching, learning and assessment principles and practices in tertiary education school activities to promote and support employee scholarly activity within the discipline in which they teach school strategies for ensuring that employees skills in contemporary teaching, learning and assessment principles relevant to their discipline, their tertiary education sector, their role, the modes of delivery in which they teach and the needs of particular student cohorts within their courses 3 HERDC means Higher Education Research Data Collection Reference Number/Code: 3016 Page 6 of 7

school strategies and activities for monitoring employee outcomes regarding the scholarship of learning and teaching/vocational education currency, and disciplinary scholarship /industry currency (applicable to VET or higher education teaching) alignment with HESF requirements, including Category Standards requirements regarding research and scholarly activity, and RTO Standards requirements. Reference Number/Code: 3016 Page 7 of 7