RESEARCH EXPENDITURES

Similar documents
u Articulation and Transfer Best Practices

Texas Healthcare & Bioscience Institute

LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Texas Libraries: Responding to the Needs of Job Seekers

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

Appendix IX. Resume of Financial Aid Director. Professional Development Training

State Budget Update February 2016

Financing Education In Minnesota

NC Community College System: Overview

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Toward a Latino Attainment Agenda:

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

UIC HEALTH SCIENCE COLLEGES

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

Director, Ohio State Agricultural Technical Institute

CURRENT POSITION: Angelo State University, San Angelo, Texas

Texas Bioscience Institute Educating Scientists For The Future. Nelda Howton

INTERPRETATIONS. Condensed FY 2009 Annual Report RESEARCH. Norman Campus

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

All Hands on Deck! Engaging Faculty Voices to Rise Above the Storm!

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

Program Change Proposal:

INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

FY Matching Scholarship Grant Allocations by County Based on Free and Reduced Lunch (FRL) Population 1

Texas A&M University-Texarkana

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Financial Plan. Operating and Capital. May2010

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

DELIVERING A DEMAND LED SYSTEM IN THE U.S. THE ALAMO COMMUNITY COLLEGES APPROACH

Program Review

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

University of Central Florida Board of Trustees Finance and Facilities Committee

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

Identifying Users of Demand-Driven E-book Programs: Applications for Collection Development

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

Texas Public Libraries:

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

A Comparison of State of Florida Charter Technical Career Centers to District Non-Charter Career Centers,

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

The Policymaking Process Course Syllabus

Michigan State University

Communities in Schools of Virginia

CHAPTER XI DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

ALAMO CITY OPHTHALMOLOGY

Cynthia M. Stanley, Ph.D., LRT, CTRS

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

David Erwin Ritter Associate Professor of Accounting MBA Coordinator Texas A&M University Central Texas

Trends in College Pricing

Dr. Tang has been an active member of CAPA since She was Co-Chair of Education Committee and Executive committee member ( ).

46 Children s Defense Fund

Reaching the Hispanic Market The Arbonne Hispanic Initiative

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

A Financial Model to Support the Future of The California State University

Welcome. Paulo Goes Dean, Eller College of Management Welcome Our region

An Analysis of the El Reno Area Labor Force

The Economic Impact of College Bowl Games

MEMORANDUM. Leo Zuniga, Associate Vice Chancellor Communications

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

Laura G. Jones-Swann

The City University of New York

College of Education Department of Educational Psychology SYLLABUS

Strategic Plan Update, Physics Department May 2010

Educational History. B. A., 1988, University Center at Tulsa, Sociology. Professional Experience. Principal Positions:

Evaluation of Teach For America:

A. Planning: All field trips being planned must follow the four step planning process. (See attached)

Virginia Principles & Practices of Real Estate for Salespersons

A Comparison of the ERP Offerings of AACSB Accredited Universities Belonging to SAPUA

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

Ringer Library Operations Audit

African American Male Achievement Update

University of Arizona

Apply Texas. Tracking Student Progress

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA TO THE STATEWIDE ECONOMY

TEM. Tribal Energy Management Degree Program San Juan Community College School of Energy

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR MEETING OF THE BOARD

Shaping the History of Photography

Biomedical Sciences. Career Awards for Medical Scientists. Collaborative Research Travel Grants

Transcription:

RESEARCH EXPENDITURES September 1, 2001 August 31, 2002 Texas Public Universities and Health-Related Institutions Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Division of Finance, Campus Planning, and Research P.O. Box 12788 Austin, TX 78711-2788 April 2003

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Pamela P. Willeford (Chair) Martin Basaldua, M.D. (Vice Chair) Raul B. Fernandez (Secretary) Neal W. Adams Ricardo G. Cigarroa, M.D. Marc Cisneros Kevin P. Eltife Jerry Farrington Cathy Obriotti Green Gerry Griffin Carey Hobbs Adair Margo Lorraine Perryman Curtis E. Ransom Hector de J. Ruiz, Ph.D. Robert W. Shepard Windy Sitton Terdema L. Ussery, II Austin Houston San Antonio Bedford Laredo Corpus Christi Tyler Dallas San Antonio Hunt Waco El Paso Odessa Dallas Austin Harlingen Lubbock Dallas Coordinating Board Mission The mission of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board is to provide the Legislature advice and comprehensive planning capability for higher education, to coordinate the effective delivery of higher education, to administer programs efficiently, and to improve higher education for the people of Texas. Coordinating Board Philosophy The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board will promote access to quality higher education across the state with the conviction that access without quality is mediocrity and that quality without access is unacceptable. The Board will be open, ethical, responsive, and committed to public service. The Board will approach its work with a sense of purpose and responsibility to the people of Texas and is committed to the best use of public monies. Created by the Texas Legislature in 1965, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board works with institutions of higher education, other state agencies, the Legislature and the Governor to ensure that Texans seeking higher education have access to high quality programs. The Board s overall responsibilities include assessing the state of higher education in Texas, making recommendations to the Governor, Legislature, and institutions for its enhancement, and establishing policies for the efficient and effective use of the state s higher education resources.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The first six sections of this report are based on data provided by each Texas public university and health-related institution for Fiscal Year 2002 September 1, 2001 through August 31, 2002. Highlights include: Total reported research expenditures increased 15.5 percent over Fiscal Year 2001. Research expenditures in Fiscal Year 2002 were $2,044,251,959. In Fiscal Year 2001, the total was $1,769,660,434. Total research expenditures increased by 95.8 percent since Fiscal Year 1991. Scientific discipline categories benefitting from the largest research expenditures include medical sciences $682,607,750; biological and other life sciences $454,394,880; engineering $304,985,071; and physical sciences $133,946,444. Funding for medical sciences increased by 16.5 percent in Fiscal Year 2002 compared to the previous year. The federal government provided 55.9 percent of the research funds expended, an increase from 55.4 percent in Fiscal Year 2001. The seventh section of this report is based on data provided by the National Science Foundation for Fiscal Year 2000, the most recent year for which this data is available. Highlights include: ο ο ο ο Texas institutions of higher education ranked sixth in federal obligations for science and engineering after California, New York, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts. The National Institutes of Health provides 62 percent of the federal research support for science and engineering to Texas higher education institutions. Texas institutions ranked third in total research expenditures for Fiscal Year 2000. Life sciences accounted for 65 percent of the research expenditures, followed by engineering (15 percent) and environmental sciences (7 percent). Eight institutions Baylor College of Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Texas A&M University (including Texas A&M Service agencies), The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston accounted for 81.3 percent of the federal obligations for science and engineering to Texas higher education institutions in Fiscal Year 2000. i

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... i Overview... 1 Major Findings... 3 Statewide Summary Data... 5 Institutional Data Universities... 13 Institutional Data Health-Related Institutions... 23 Historical Data... 27 National Comparisons... 32 Appendix A Research Expenses Surveys... A-1 Appendix B Institutional Contacts... B-1 iii

iv

LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Tables: 1 Research and Development Expenditures Rankings, FY 2002... 3 2 Federal/State Research and Development Expenditures Ratio Rankings, FY 2002... 4 3 Sources of Funds for Research and Other Research-Related Sponsored Programs, FY 2002... 5 4 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Field and Source of Funding, FY 2002, Texas Public Institutions of Higher Education... 9 5 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D in Areas of Special Interest, FY 2002, Texas Public Universities... 11 6 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D in Areas of Special Interest, FY 2002, Texas Public Health-Related Institutions... 12 7 Total Expenditures for Research and Other Research-Related Sponsored Programs by Source of Funds, FY 2002... 14 8 Federal R&D Expenditures/FTE Faculty Ratio, FY 2002, Texas Public Universities... 17 9 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Field, FY 2002, Texas Public Universities... 18 10 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Area of Special Interest, FY 2002, Texas Public Universities... 21 11 Total Expenditures for Sponsored Programs by Source of Funds, FY 2002... 24 12 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Field, FY 2002, Texas Public Health-Related Institutions... 25 13 Expenditures for Research and Development by Area of Special Interest, FY 2002 Texas Public Health-Related Institutions... 26 14 Expenditures for Research and Development, Texas Public Universities... 28 15 Federal Expenditures for Research and Development, Texas Public Universities... 29 16 Expenditures for Research and Development, Texas Public Health-Related Institutions... 30 v

17 Federal Expenditures for Research and Development, Texas Public Health-Related Institutions... 30 18 Federal Expenditures for Research and Development by Field, Texas Public Universities and Health-Related Institutions... 31 19 Top Five States in Federal R&D Expenditures Selected Science and Engineering Fields, FY 2000... 33 20 State Rank in Federal Obligations and Federally Financed R&D, FY 2000... 33 21 Federal Obligations and Federally Financed R&D by Texas Institutions, FY 2000... 36 22 Texas Universities and Colleges with Federal Science and Engineering R&D Obligations of more than $10 Million by Support Agency, FY 2000... 39 Figures: 1 Expenditures for All Research-Related Sponsored Programs, FY 2002... 7 2 Sources of Expenditures for All Research-Related Sponsored Programs, FY 2002... 7 3 Expenditures for Research and Development at Texas Public Universities, FY 2002... 8 4 Sources of Expenditures for Research and Development at Texas Public Health-Related Institutions, FY 2002...8 5 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Discipline... 10 6 Expenditures for Research and Development at Texas Public Universities, FY 2002... 13 7 Expenditures for Research and Development at Texas Public Health-Related Institutions, FY 2002... 23 8 Expenditures for Research and Development, FY 1982-2002... 27 9 Federal Obligations for R&D in Science and Engineering, Universities and Colleges Selected States, 1991-2000... 35 10 Federally Financed R&D Expenditures, Universities and Colleges Selected States, 1991-2000... 35 11 Federal Obligations for R&D in Science and Engineering, Texas Universities and Colleges, 1991-2000 Top Five Support Agencies... 38 12 Federally Financed Research Expenditures by Discipline, Texas Public and Private Institutions, FY 2000... 39 vi

OVERVIEW The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board s annual research expenditures report summarizes data submitted to the Board as required by Section 61.051(h) of the Texas Education Code, which states: Once a year, on dates prescribed by the board, each institution of higher education shall report to the board all research conducted at that institution during the last preceding year. The Coordinating Board s summary report is based on expenditures rather than awards because expenditures more accurately reflect the level of current research activity. Awards tend to fluctuate from year to year, making them a much less stable indicator for year-to-year comparisons. The Coordinating Board is only able to verify the accuracy of the research expenditures data by asking institutions to ensure that the data reported are consistent with data in their Annual Financial Reports. According to recent changes adopted by the Government Accounting Standards Board, expenses rather than expenditures will be reported in institutional annual financial reports prepared for Fiscal Year 2002 and beyond. The major difference for research reporting purposes is that capital outlays for research equipment will be depreciated over the life of the equipment and will not be separately identified as research items in current annual financial reports. To provide research expenditure data comparable to that gathered in the past, the institutions were allowed to add capital outlays for research equipment to their research expenses for this report. In addition, the current annual financial reports no longer have a section Exhibit C - Current Funds Expenditures, Expenditure Category Research that was used in previous years as the basis for reconciling data from those reports with data gathered for this report. To facilitate reconciliation, the institutions were asked to submit annual financial reports using functional classifications that show expenses broken out by instruction, research, public service, etc. A set of definitions is provided in the research expenditures survey to help ensure consistency from institution to institution. Even with these safeguards, institutions have some latitude in determining how they report data. Data elements and definitions used in this year s report are comparable to similar research expenditure data elements used by the National Science Foundation (NSF). The two sets of elements differ to some degree because the NSF focuses on science and technology alone, while the Coordinating Board s report includes research in all disciplines. Collection of research expenditure data is a challenging task for institutions. Administrators face many difficulties as they sort out research expenditures at their institutions. For that reason, information they have submitted and the Coordinating Board s research expenditures report should be considered indicative rather than definitive. 1

Appendix A includes a copy of the survey form completed by each institution. Appendix B includes a list of the institutional contacts who collected the data on their campuses. This report also contains a section, beginning on page 32, that compares research funding in Texas with that of other states. This data is drawn from three National Science Foundation reports on research obligations and research expenditures. 2

---- MAJOR FINDINGS Total research expenditures at Texas public institutions of higher education increased by 15.5 percent during Fiscal Year 2002, continuing a long-term growth trend. Most of the growth occurred at health-related institutions. Total research expenditures increased by $152,013,385 (18.5 percent) for health-related institutions and $122,578,140 (12.9 percent) for universities compared to Fiscal Year 2001. As in most states, Texas higher education research expenditures were concentrated in a relatively small number of institutions. Collectively, the top five institutions in research spending accounted for 68 percent of total research expenditures. The top 10 institutions accounted for 87 percent of the total. Six of the state's health-related institutions ranked among the top 10 Texas public institutions in research expenditures. In addition, the top seven institutions in Table 1 also appear in the National Science Foundation s list of top 100 institutions in federal research and development expenditures for 2000. Table 1 Research and Development Expenditures Rankings, FY 2002 Institution 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Texas A&M University (including Texas A&M Services) 1 1 1 1 1 The University of Texas at Austin 2 2 2 2 2 The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas 3 3 3 3 3 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 4 4 4 4 4 The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston 5 5 5 5 5 The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio 6 7 7 6 6 The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston 7 6 6 7 7 University of Houston 8 8 8 8 8 Texas Tech University 9 9 9 9 9 Texas A&M University System Health Science Center* - - - 10 10 *TAMU College of Medicine combined with TAMUS Baylor College of Dentistry to form Texas A&M HSC in FY2000. The federal government funded 55.9 percent of all research expenditures by Texas public institutions of higher education, making it the source of most research funds as it is in other states. At academic institutions 1 nationwide, the National Science Foundation/SRS, Academic 1 For this purpose, academic institutions are generally defined as institutions of higher education that grant bachelors or doctorates in science or engineering and spend at least $150,000 for separately budgeted research and development. 3

Research and Development Expenditures: Fiscal Year 2000, Table B-29 shows that 58.2 percent 2 of the academic research was funded by the federal government. State government in Texas provided 20.2 percent of the funds for all research expenditures in the state s public higher education institutions. Institutional and private funding accounted for the remaining 24 percent. The ratio of federal funds to state-appropriated funds for each of the 10 Texas institutions reporting the greatest research expenditures is provided in Table 2. Table 2 Federal/State Research and Development Expenditures Ratio Rankings, FY 2002 Institution R&D Rank Fed/State Ratio Ratio Rank The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio 7 13.50 1 The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas 4 9.09 2 The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston 5 8.33 3 The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston 6 6.28 4 The University of Texas at Austin 2 4.46 5 Texas A&M University System Health Science Center 10 1.82 6 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 3 1.65 7 Texas A&M University (including Texas A&M Services) 1 1.41 8 University of Houston 8 1.16 9 Texas Tech University 9 0.96 10 Medical sciences, accounting for 33 percent of the total, led all other disciplines in expenditures. The top five disciplines medical sciences, engineering, biological and other life sciences, physical sciences, and environmental sciences collectively accounted for 83.4 percent of all reported research expenditures. California ($2.25 billion), New York ($1.27 billion), Maryland ($1 billion), Pennsylvania ($0.99 billion), Massachusetts ($0.94 billion), and Texas ($0.83 billion) were the top six states in federal obligations for research and developmment in science and engineering for Fiscal Year 2000. The National Institutes of Health, the Department of Defense, and the National Science Foundation provided 68.1 percent, 11.9 percent, and 7.2 percent, respectively, of the Fiscal Year 2000 federal obligations for research and development in science and engineering to Texas higher education institutions. 2 This percentage was reported incorrectly in the FY 1999 and FY 2000 issues of Research Expenditures. The correct values are 58.6 percent for FY 1999 and 58.4 percent for FY 2000. 4

STATEWIDE SUMMARY DATA Expenditures related to research are divided into two categories: (1) expenditures for the conduct of research and development and (2) other sponsored activities. Other sponsored activities refers to support received from external sources to fund activities that cannot be considered strictly research. Examples include grants for equipment or facilities, contracts to perform studies, and training. Definitions for both categories are included in the survey form that is Appendix A. Tables 3 and 4 and Figures 1-4 provide information on expenses and sources of funds for research and development and for other sponsored activities related to research at public universities and health-related institutions. Some institutions do not report funds used for other sponsored activities related to research. Table 3 Sources of Funds for Research and Other Research-Related Sponsored Programs, FY 2002 State Federal Contracts Institution Appropriated and Grants Public Universities Research and Development $564,550,414 $180,627,629 $94,943,553 $88,918,642 Other $10,055,582 $6,412,499 $1,761,699 $10,671,988 Total $574,605,996 $187,040,128 $96,705,252 $99,590,630 Public Health-Related Institutions Research and Development $577,718,247 $119,859,163 $16,843,282 $38,501,268 Other $887,119 $5,726,723 $0 $6,512,966 Total $578,605,366 $125,585,886 $16,843,282 $45,014,234 All Public Institutions Research and Development $1,142,268,661 $300,486,792 $111,786,835 $127,419,910 Other $10,942,701 $12,139,222 $1,761,699 $17,184,954 Totals $1,153,211,362 $312,626,014 $113,548,534 $144,604,864 (table continued on next page) 5

Table 3 - continued Sources of Funds for Research and Other Research-Related Sponsored Programs, FY 2002 Private Profit Non-Profit Total Public Universities Research and Development $64,765,233 $76,995,985 $1,070,801,456 Other $275,062 $510,957 $29,687,787 Total $65,040,295 $77,506,942 $1,100,489,243 Public Health-Related Institutions Research and Development $78,841,164 $141,687,379 $973,450,503 Other $5,336 $96,001 $13,228,145 Total $78,846,500 $141,783,380 $986,678,648 All Public Institutions Research and Development $143,606,397 $218,683,364 $2,044,251,959 Other $280,398 $606,958 $42,915,932 Totals $143,886,795 $219,290,322 $2,087,167,891 6

Figure 1 Sources of Expenditures for All Research-Related Sponsored Programs, FY 2002 Federal 55.3% Expenditures for All Research-Related Sponsored Programs, FY 2002 Research & Development 97.9% State 20.4% Institution 6.9% Pr ivate 17.4% Other Sponsored Progams 2.1% Figure 2 Sources of Expenditures for All Research-Related Sponsored Programs, FY 2002 Federal 55.3% State 20.4% Institution 6.9% Private 17.4% 7

Figure 3 Expenditures for Research and Development at Texas Public Universities, FY 2002 Federal 52.7% State 25.7% Institution 8.3% Private 13.2% Figure 4 Sources of Expenditures for Research and Development at Texas Public Health-Related Institutions, FY 2002 Federal 59.3% State 14.0% Institution 4.0% Private 22.7% 8

Table 4 indicates expenditures in the 16 different fields defined in Appendix A. The Coordinating Board s instructions directed institutions to assign project expenditures to only one field to avoid duplication. For the most part, this table reflects expenditures in particular academic disciplines. Some inconsistency may result, however, as institutions strive to categorize a particular research project into only one field. For example, a college of agriculture could perform basic research in biological sciences and report expenses in that field rather than in agricultural sciences. Proportions of expenses by discipline are shown in Figure 5. Medical and biological sciences account for slightly more than one-half of all research expenditures. Table 4 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Field and Source of Funding, FY 2002 Texas Public Institutions of Higher Education State Federal Contracts Institution Appropriated and Grants Agricultural Sciences $25,352,992 $26,258,553 $5,099,250 $10,503,023 Biological and Other Life Sciences $260,564,270 $77,442,282 $9,260,584 $29,934,797 Computer Science $31,440,414 $7,738,310 $2,549,884 $2,287,223 Engineering $155,461,426 $40,541,733 $46,773,762 $18,376,386 Environmental Sciences $91,715,782 $15,720,799 $6,045,456 $4,944,154 Mathematical Sciences $26,934,849 $7,325,190 $1,815,660 $1,076,035 Medical Sciences $401,490,302 $73,383,602 $15,920,599 $31,266,530 Physical Sciences $79,873,134 $23,858,352 $1,905,088 $6,031,638 Psychology $15,332,253 $979,356 $1,730,490 $477,093 Social Sciences $13,416,477 $9,943,710 $9,717,024 $3,799,898 Other Sciences $6,835,106 $3,409,185 $2,108,240 $422,657 Arts and Humanities $948,930 $814,493 $335,001 $3,247,321 Business Administration $2,502,075 $2,537,142 $727,711 $768,365 Education $24,348,321 $1,108,833 $3,187,055 $2,555,417 Law and Public Administration $1,753,585 $512,384 $1,735,915 $164,001 Other Non-Science Activities $4,309,209 $8,902,404 $2,875,116 $11,565,372 Totals $1,142,279,125 $300,476,328 $111,786,835 $127,419,910 (table continued on next page) 9

Table 4 - continued Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Field and Source of Funding, FY 2002 Texas Public Institutions of Higher Education Private Profit Non-Profit Total Agricultural Sciences $4,611,228 $9,179,686 $81,004,732 Biological and Other Life Sciences $17,900,438 $59,292,509 $454,394,880 Computer Science $1,318,386 $937,633 $46,271,850 Engineering $33,363,727 $10,468,037 $304,985,071 Environmental Sciences $6,753,493 $3,740,123 $128,919,807 Mathematical Sciences $1,565,232 $1,310,410 $40,027,376 Medical Sciences $66,633,809 $93,912,908 $682,607,750 Physical Sciences $5,320,791 $16,957,441 $133,946,444 Psychology $567,206 $551,992 $19,638,390 Social Sciences $1,693,080 $5,910,142 $44,480,331 Other Sciences $241,762 $1,551,138 $14,568,088 Arts and Humanities $456,641 $1,149,928 $6,952,314 Business Administration $1,009,174 $3,040,137 $10,584,604 Education $279,700 $7,673,656 $39,152,982 Law and Public Administration $111,308 $1,245,266 $5,522,459 Other Non-Science Activities $1,780,422 $1,762,358 $31,194,881 Totals $143,606,397 $218,683,364 $2,044,251,959 Figure 5 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Discipline Biological and Other Life Sciences 22.2% Engineering 14.9% Physical Sciences 6.6% Environmental Sciences 6.3% Agricultural Sciences 4.0% Medical Sciences 33.4% All Other 12.6% 10

Table 5 shows research in nine different areas of special interest at public universities, and Table 6 shows research in six different areas of special interest at public health-related institutions. Double counting was allowed because many projects are relevant to two or more areas of research. Table 5 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D in Areas of Special Interest, FY 2002 Texas Public Universities State Federal Contracts Institution Appropriated and Grants Aerospace Technology $25,990,354 $1,809,691 $92,731 $805,500 Biotechnology $37,838,662 $22,116,541 $1,488,717 $15,132,431 Energy $31,917,784 $6,676,797 $1,109,484 $928,153 Environmental Science & Engineering $53,074,216 $16,979,174 $4,169,376 $4,892,458 Food, Fiber, Agricultural Products $17,218,465 $29,548,321 $2,731,366 $12,445,392 Manufacturing Technology $3,833,889 $1,804,866 $1,080,395 $734,349 Materials Science $24,564,416 $3,238,835 $4,281,769 $833,090 Microelectronics & Computer Technology $37,969,063 $11,250,428 $1,178,347 $2,654,450 Water Resources $4,853,821 $2,724,306 $1,519,902 $2,103,818 Totals $237,260,670 $96,148,959 $17,652,087 $40,529,641 Table 5 - continued Expenditures for Conduct of R&D in Areas of Special Interest, FY 2002 Texas Public Universities Private Profit Non-Profit Total Aerospace Technology $190,801 $782,440 $29,671,517 Biotechnology $4,869,044 $9,433,088 $90,878,483 Energy $2,150,788 $5,083,050 $47,866,056 Environmental Science & Engineering $1,742,742 $7,488,432 $88,346,398 Food, Fiber, Agricultural Products $4,252,933 $9,808,701 $76,005,178 Manufacturing Technology $855,343 $830,996 $9,139,838 Materials Science $4,133,541 $3,465,751 $40,517,402 Microelectronics & Computer Technology $3,372,564 $3,435,151 $59,860,003 Water Resources $721,400 $2,379,543 $14,302,790 Totals $22,289,156 $42,707,152 $456,587,665 11

Table 6 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D in Areas of Special Interest, FY 2002 Texas Public Health-Related Institutions State Federal Contracts Institution Appropriated and Grants Aging $27,325,006 $1,497,485 $495,437 $218,345 Cancer Research $156,833,474 $75,211,486 $3,377,692 $14,257,378 Cardiovascular Research $40,111,044 $5,887,940 $913,950 $1,822,548 Child Health and Human Development $21,086,969 $355,475 $1,836,160 $1,376,225 Mental Health $18,192,303 $1,304,617 $417,343 $380,108 Substance Abuse $26,458,283 $512,187 $668,777 $207,469 Totals $290,007,079 $84,769,190 $7,709,359 $18,262,073 Table 6 - continued Expenditures for Conduct of R&D in Areas of Special Interest, FY 2002 Texas Public Health-Related Institutions Private Profit Non-Profit Total Aging $834,647 $3,898,526 $34,269,446 Cancer Research $35,633,919 $35,878,669 $321,192,618 Cardiovascular Research $2,961,460 $9,438,320 $61,135,262 Child Health and Human Development $847,946 $4,109,593 $29,612,368 Mental Health $2,353,162 $2,578,118 $25,225,651 Substance Abuse $156,927 $460,852 $28,464,495 Totals $42,788,061 $56,364,078 $499,899,840 12

INSTITUTIONAL DATA UNIVERSITIES This section of the report contains detailed information on research expenditures reported by individual institutions. Statements related to data quality and applicability found on page 1 of this report also apply to the data shown in this section of the report. Figure 6 Expenditures for Research and Development at Texas Public Universities, FY 2002 (Millions of Dollars) 0 100 200 300 400 All Others UT-Pan-American Texas Women's Texas A&M at Galveston Lamar Texas Southern Stephen F. Austin State West Texas A&M Tarleton State Texas A&M-Kingsville Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake Prairie View A&M Texas A&M-Corpus Christi Southwest Texas State UT at San Antonio University of North Texas UT at Arlington UT at El Paso UT at Dallas Texas Tech Univ. of Houston UT at Austin Texas A&M and Services 9.1 2.6 3.0 4.0 4.2 4.9 5.6 6.0 7.9 8.6 8.9 10.3 10.4 10.4 12.4 12.9 21.1 27.3 27.4 51.7 82.9 366.4 372.8 13

Table 7 Total Expenditures for Research and Other Research-Related Sponsored Programs by Source of Funds, FY 2002 State Institution Federal Appropriated Contracts and Grants R&D Other R&D Other R&D Other Midwestern State $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Stephen F. Austin State $1,054,239 $0 $0 $0 $91,002 $0 Texas A&M University System* Prairie View A&M $7,915,204 $313,473 $1,990,481 $254,617 $200,965 $0 Tarleton State $5,431,723 $0 $2,133,932 $0 $114,378 $0 Texas A&M and Services $166,285,925 $33,793 $76,341,412 $118,428 $41,702,982 $2,908 Texas A&M-Commerce $315,173 $0 $104,398 $0 $0 $0 Texas A&M-Corpus Christi $4,473,974 $0 $1,313,230 $0 $2,711,375 $0 Texas A&M at Galveston $2,362,832 $0 $604,959 $262,341 $450,746 $83,131 Texas A&M International $572,462 $0 $1,014 $0 $16,475 $0 Texas A&M-Kingsville $1,950,923 $0 $3,256,322 $0 $1,068,783 $0 Texas A&M-Texarkana $182,262 $0 $0 $2,336 $0 $0 West Texas A&M $3,531,219 $0 $2,072,234 $879,668 $38,585 $0 Texas Southern $4,147,663 $0 $0 $0 $672,878 $0 Texas State University System Angelo State $254,963 $0 $392,332 $0 $71,526 $0 Lamar $2,279,805 $104,657 $1,128,576 $224,982 $338,332 $24,675 Sam Houston State $1,491,475 $9,603,659 $0 $0 $330,814 $1,650,985 Southwest Texas State $4,769,709 $0 $1,491,428 $0 $2,386,188 $0 Sul Ross State $76,368 $0 $555,771 $0 $94,914 $0 Sul Ross - Rio Grande $0 $0 $10,464 $0 $0 $0 Texas Tech $20,511,493 $0 $16,178,777 $0 $5,171,320 $0 Texas Woman's $1,321,373 $0 $977,936 $830,873 $289,499 $0 University of Texas System UT at Arlington $7,923,657 $0 $8,543,962 $0 $960,972 $0 UT at Austin $235,436,101 $0 $27,400,063 $0 $25,429,462 $0 UT at Brownsville $896,646 $0 $0 $0 $2,082 $0 UT at Dallas $11,815,490 $0 $8,278,639 $0 $138,086 $0 UT at El Paso $19,796,441 $0 $3,451,647 $0 $803,955 $0 UT-Pan American $1,394,780 $0 $882,781 $0 $30,664 $0 UT of the Permian Basin $138,194 $0 $622,875 $0 $60,088 $0 UT at San Antonio $7,641,990 $0 $1,954,697 $0 $1,560,850 $0 UT at Tyler $67,617 $0 $220,268 $0 $107 $0 University of Houston System Univ. of Houston $33,239,410 $0 $19,723,967 $0 $8,815,293 $0 Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake $7,659,934 $0 $603,335 $0 $93,828 $0 Univ. of Houston-Downtown $783,394 $0 $392,129 $0 $0 $0 Univ. of Houston-Victoria $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 University of North Texas $8,827,975 $0 $0 $3,839,254 $1,297,404 $0 Totals $564,550,414 $10,055,582 $180,627,629 $6,412,499 $94,943,553 $1,761,699 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. * A&M agency and research foundation expenditures reported by individual affiliated university. (table continued on next page) 14

Table 7 - continued Total Expenditures for Research and Other Research-Related Sponsored Programs by Source of Funds, FY 2002 Institution Institution Private, Profit Private, Non-Profit R&D Other R&D Other R&D Other Midwestern State $2,347 $0 $0 $0 $72,279 $0 Stephen F. Austin State $1,920,220 $0 $110,870 $0 $2,406,720 $0 Texas A&M University System* Prairie View A&M $86,497 $132,118 $38,626 $0 $98,312 $11,197 Tarleton State $59,148 $0 $119,239 $0 $51,579 $0 Texas A&M and Services $45,409,972 $1,754,356 $21,704,999 $275,062 $21,383,564 $49,465 Texas A&M-Commerce $0 $0 $157,067 $0 $52,858 $0 Texas A&M-Corpus Christi $297,032 $0 $95,263 $0 $1,474,627 $0 Texas A&M at Galveston $170,095 $23,905 $54,770 $0 $367,216 $1,623 Texas A&M International $39,689 $0 $0 $0 $47,706 $0 Texas A&M-Kingsville $0 $0 $522,869 $0 $1,792,931 $0 Texas A&M-Texarkana $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,990 $0 West Texas A&M $62,810 $0 $2,285 $0 $329,580 $0 Texas Southern $0 $0 $22,801 $0 $86,775 $0 Texas State University System Angelo State $0 $0 $51,681 $0 $29,542 $0 Lamar $199,413 $114,255 $165,632 $0 $126,157 $81,051 Sam Houston State $0 $0 $9 $0 $108,716 $367,621 Southwest Texas State $426,849 $0 $78,459 $0 $1,248,194 $0 Sul Ross State $0 $0 $0 $0 $114,373 $0 Sul Ross - Rio Grande $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Texas Tech $1,462,594 $88,169 $4,046,465 $0 $4,330,800 $0 Texas Woman's $0 $0 $99,602 $0 $271,605 $0 University of Texas System UT at Arlington $117,013 $0 $2,266,093 $0 $1,261,267 $0 UT at Austin $29,204,451 $0 $27,760,251 $0 $21,125,031 $0 UT at Brownsville $118,875 $0 $0 $0 $269,035 $0 UT at Dallas $1,312,341 $5,986,596 $2,033,117 $0 $3,866,384 $0 UT at El Paso $1,237,006 $423,963 $222,252 $0 $1,817,471 $0 UT-Pan American $49,936 $0 $9,143 $0 $238,454 $0 UT of the Permian Basin $124,984 $0 $0 $0 $34,764 $0 UT at San Antonio $285,988 $0 $54,059 $0 $904,433 $0 UT at Tyler $12,533 $0 $31,056 $0 $44,240 $0 University of Houston System Univ. of Houston $5,877,555 $0 $4,302,102 $0 $10,906,980 $0 Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake $370,348 $0 $39,044 $0 $95,719 $0 Univ. of Houston-Downtown $70,946 $0 $0 $0 $24,025 $0 Univ. of Houston-Victoria $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 University of North Texas $0 $2,148,626 $777,479 $0 $1,984,658 $0 Totals $88,918,642 $10,671,988 $64,765,233 $275,062 $76,995,985 $510,957 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. * A&M agency and research foundation expenditures reported by individual affiliated university. (table continued on next page) 15

Table 7 - continued Total Expenditures for Research and Other Research-Related Sponsored Programs by Source of Funds, FY 2002 Institution Total R&D Other R&D and Other Midwestern State $74,626 $0 $74,626 Stephen F. Austin State $5,583,051 $0 $5,583,051 Texas A&M University System* Prairie View A&M $10,330,085 $711,405 $11,041,490 Tarleton State $7,909,999 $0 $7,909,999 Texas A&M and Services $372,828,854 $2,234,012 $375,062,866 Texas A&M-Commerce $629,496 $0 $629,496 Texas A&M-Corpus Christi $10,365,501 $0 $10,365,501 Texas A&M at Galveston $4,010,618 $371,000 $4,381,618 Texas A&M International $677,346 $0 $677,346 Texas A&M-Kingsville $8,591,828 $0 $8,591,828 Texas A&M-Texarkana $212,252 $2,336 $214,588 West Texas A&M $6,036,713 $879,668 $6,916,381 Texas Southern $4,930,117 $0 $4,930,117 Texas State University System Angelo State $800,044 $0 $800,044 Lamar $4,237,915 $549,620 $4,787,535 Sam Houston State $1,931,014 $11,622,265 $13,553,279 Southwest Texas State $10,400,827 $0 $10,400,827 Sul Ross State $841,426 $0 $841,426 Sul Ross - Rio Grande $10,464 $0 $10,464 Texas Tech $51,701,449 $88,169 $51,789,618 Texas Woman's $2,960,015 $830,873 $3,790,888 University of Texas System UT at Arlington $21,072,964 $0 $21,072,964 UT at Austin $366,355,359 $0 $366,355,359 UT at Brownsville $1,286,638 $0 $1,286,638 UT at Dallas $27,444,057 $5,986,596 $33,430,653 UT at El Paso $27,328,772 $423,963 $27,752,735 UT-Pan American $2,605,758 $0 $2,605,758 UT of the Permian Basin $980,905 $0 $980,905 UT at San Antonio $12,402,017 $0 $12,402,017 UT at Tyler $375,821 $0 $375,821 University of Houston System Univ. of Houston $82,865,307 $0 $82,865,307 Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake $8,862,208 $0 $8,862,208 Univ. of Houston-Downtown $1,270,494 $0 $1,270,494 Univ. of Houston-Victoria $0 $0 $0 University of North Texas $12,887,516 $5,987,880 $18,875,396 Totals $1,070,801,456 $29,687,787 $1,100,489,243 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. * A&M agency and research foundation expenditures reported by individual affiliated university. 16

Table 8 Federal R&D Expenditures/FTE Faculty Ratio, FY 2002 Texas Public Universities Institution Federal R&D Federal R&D FTE Faculty* Expenditures Expenditures/FTE Midwestern State $0 137.40 $0.00 Stephen F. Austin State $1,054,239 333.54 $3,160.76 Texas A&M University System** Prairie View A&M $7,915,204 181.85 $43,526.00 Tarleton State $5,431,723 183.78 $29,555.57 Texas A&M and Services*** $166,285,925 1,567.71 $106,069.31 Texas A&M-Commerce $315,173 170.68 $1,846.57 Texas A&M-Corpus Christi $4,473,974 159.36 $28,074.64 Texas A&M at Galveston $2,362,832 33.04 $71,514.29 Texas A&M International $572,462 109.75 $5,216.05 Texas A&M-Kingsville $1,950,923 210.06 $9,287.46 Texas A&M-Texarkana $182,262 34.65 $5,260.09 West Texas A&M $3,531,219 148.11 $23,841.87 Texas Southern $4,147,663 200.27 $20,710.36 Texas State University System Angelo State $254,963 156.52 $1,628.95 Lamar $2,279,805 235.29 $9,689.34 Sam Houston State $1,491,475 304.84 $4,892.65 Southwest Texas State $4,769,709 505.46 $9,436.37 Sul Ross State $76,368 72.34 $1,055.68 Sul Ross - Rio Grande $0 21.58 $0.00 Texas Tech $20,511,493 790.75 $25,939.29 Texas Woman's $1,321,373 265.32 $4,980.30 University of Texas System UT at Arlington $7,923,657 476.06 $16,644.24 UT at Austin $235,436,101 1,550.79 $151,816.88 UT at Brownsville $896,646 119.03 $7,532.94 UT at Dallas $11,815,490 241.81 $48,862.70 UT at El Paso $19,796,441 385.99 $51,287.45 UT-Pan American $1,394,780 310.60 $4,490.60 UT of the Permian Basin $138,194 72.25 $1,912.72 UT at San Antonio $7,641,990 338.40 $22,582.71 UT at Tyler $67,617 132.75 $509.36 University of Houston System Univ. of Houston $33,239,410 798.53 $41,625.75 Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake $7,659,934 160.33 $47,776.05 Univ. of Houston-Downtown $783,394 170.31 $4,599.81 Univ. of Houston-Victoria $0 50.25 $0.00 University of North Texas $8,827,975 659.23 $13,391.34 Totals $564,550,414 11,288.63 $50,010.53 * FTE Faculty indicates number of full-time equivalents for tenured and tenure-track faculty for fall of 2001. ** A&M agency and research foundation expenditures reported by individual affiliated university. *** FTE faculty for Texas A&M and Services is based on its Legislative Appropriations Request for FY 2002 and includes 280 FTEs from Texas Agricultural Experiment Station and 23.3 from Texas Engineering Experiment Station. 17

Institution Table 9 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Field, FY 2002 Texas Public Universities Agricultural Sciences Biological and Other Life Sciences Computer Science Engineering Environmental Sciences Mathematical Sciences Midwestern State $0 $43,739 $0 $0 $0 $0 Stephen F. Austin State $3,475,303 $1,022,393 $0 $0 $17,578 $11,766 Texas A&M University System* Prairie View A&M $5,128,079 $53,209 $785,741 $2,978,216 $0 $68,060 Tarleton State $3,542,491 $186,481 $0 $27,622 $3,659,468 $64,799 Texas A&M and Services $48,591,995 $65,853,070 $7,664,703 $110,562,877 $60,704,381 $7,299,873 Texas A&M-Commerce $120,088 $19,895 $14,456 $0 $0 $2,998 Texas A&M-Corpus Christi $106,562 $370,821 $212,865 $1,916,060 $2,607,418 $1,034,492 Texas A&M at Galveston $0 $561,077 $0 $155,550 $3,063,741 $613 Texas A&M International $0 $50,404 $0 $241,497 $20,643 $0 Texas A&M-Kingsville $5,057,635 $862,144 $0 $1,564,534 $546,994 $0 Texas A&M-Texarkana $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 West Texas A&M $1,577,619 $114,886 $5,021 $3,430,109 $89,515 $0 Texas Southern $0 $3,587,479 $22,493 $33,120 $0 $0 Texas State University System Angelo State $480,885 $76,074 $0 $0 $0 $0 Lamar $0 $6,633 $840 $1,480,142 $1,934,820 $6,493 Sam Houston State $71,916 $418,463 $0 $0 $882,161 $109,098 Southwest Texas State $24,626 $1,577,254 $131,775 $45,348 $143,653 $1,135,731 Sul Ross State $180,376 $119,620 $0 $0 $77,649 $0 Sul Ross - Rio Grande $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Texas Tech $12,440,290 $3,503,519 $1,044,380 $14,195,580 $9,971,468 $833,655 Texas Woman's $0 $1,340,640 $0 $0 $0 $8,732 University of Texas System UT at Arlington $0 $893,371 $1,640,740 $11,188,347 $168,124 $399,618 UT at Austin $117,521 $33,889,535 $20,275,127 $125,287,955 $34,084,001 $17,076,385 UT at Brownsville $2,082 $127,653 $0 $0 $34,835 $0 UT at Dallas $0 $2,794,424 $2,999,028 $4,757,023 $1,621,333 $473,979 UT at El Paso $0 $3,075,405 $803,579 $3,848,770 $6,066,725 $86,307 UT-Pan American $73,651 $71,805 $80,990 $716,854 $54,558 $23,420 UT of the Permian Basin $0 $58,658 $29,664 $5,671 $26,846 $0 UT at San Antonio $0 $6,284,214 $730,997 $494,639 $413,842 $69,492 UT at Tyler $0 $35,651 $0 $45,995 $0 $11,404 University of Houston System Univ. of Houston $0 $6,785,627 $8,568,959 $12,385,254 $1,567,809 $479,506 Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake $0 $232,051 $416,862 $7,137,107 $239,532 $96,419 Univ. of Houston-Downtown $13,613 $9,907 $529,155 $0 $0 $163,089 Univ. of Houston-Victoria $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 University of North Texas $0 $1,271,377 $314,205 $47,928 $723,015 $224,894 Totals $81,004,732 $135,297,479 $46,271,580 $302,546,198 $128,720,109 $29,680,823 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. * A&M agency and research foundation expenditures reported by individual affiliated university. (table continued on next page) 18

Table 9 - continued Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Field, FY 2002 Texas Public Universities Institution Medical Sciences Physical Sciences Psychology Social Sciences Other Sciences Midwestern State $6,395 $0 $3,429 $6,604 $0 Stephen F. Austin State $0 $77,044 $69,087 $48,579 $44,294 Texas A&M University System* Prairie View A&M $416,027 $657,804 $0 $2,584 $0 Tarleton State $1,332 $0 $0 $1,050 $64,292 Texas A&M and Services $20,222,286 $22,352,593 $2,876,477 $14,598,018 $1,990,334 Texas A&M-Commerce $0 $18,977 $280 $4,696 $80,394 Texas A&M-Corpus Christi $184,377 $92,744 $0 $142,452 $224,408 Texas A&M at Galveston $0 $210,071 $0 $0 $19,506 Texas A&M International $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,017 Texas A&M-Kingsville $0 $105,800 $0 $0 $156,023 Texas A&M-Texarkana $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 West Texas A&M $6,677 $31,283 $0 $0 $580 Texas Southern $0 $262,650 $0 $0 $283,097 Texas State University System Angelo State $5,404 $147,129 $8,625 $18,660 $0 Lamar $0 $148,518 $0 $0 $0 Sam Houston State $0 $302,691 $3,299 $10,761 $0 Southwest Texas State $323,139 $3,479,570 $997 $1,131,398 $114,714 Sul Ross State $0 $0 $0 $323,649 $0 Sul Ross - Rio Grande $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Texas Tech $0 $6,285,315 $214,501 $2,611,991 $0 Texas Woman's $1,291,931 $34,320 $250 $54,171 $123,839 University of Texas System UT at Arlington $56,024 $3,991,995 $199,558 $376,442 $0 UT at Austin $16,702,273 $57,185,106 $5,350,294 $15,623,575 $2,745,918 UT at Brownsville $228,467 $413,636 $0 $329,443 $10,522 UT at Dallas $1,334,583 $7,336,969 $1,996,724 $2,972,507 $0 UT at El Paso $640,259 $1,238,190 $589,592 $239,631 $3,494,916 UT-Pan American $950,083 $175,515 $509 $188,999 $0 UT of the Permian Basin $5,117 $57,056 $0 $20,737 $49,120 UT at San Antonio $0 $529,534 $97,097 $2,377,786 $0 UT at Tyler $83,155 $0 $14,380 $8,470 $37,717 University of Houston System Univ. of Houston $5,372,552 $20,050,286 $7,461,990 $1,325,657 $3,706,057 Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake $0 $155,890 $67,083 $0 $12,726 Univ. of Houston-Downtown $0 $252,037 $0 $7,437 $78,787 Univ. of Houston-Victoria $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 University of North Texas $0 $3,339,478 $588,790 $2,055,034 $0 Totals $47,830,081 $128,932,201 $19,542,962 $44,480,331 $13,245,261 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. * A&M agency and research foundation expenditures reported by individual affiliated university. (table continued on next page) 19

Table 9 - continued Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Field, FY 2002 Texas Public Universities Institution Arts and Humanities Business Administration Education Law and Public Administration Other Non- Sciences Total Midwestern State $12,112 $2,347 $0 $0 $0 $74,626 Stephen F. Austin State $145,596 $39,697 $246,645 $385,069 $0 $5,583,051 Texas A&M University System* Prairie View A&M $3,813 $2,502 $234,050 $0 $0 $10,330,085 Tarleton State $14,130 $0 $304,616 $0 $43,718 $7,909,999 Texas A&M and Services $937,074 $3,927,010 $4,013,885 $1,117,720 $116,558 $372,828,854 Texas A&M-Commerce $35,439 $2,230 $306,789 $0 $23,254 $629,496 Texas A&M-Corpus Christi $24,229 $20,027 $2,065,788 $0 $1,363,258 $10,365,501 Texas A&M at Galveston $0 $0 $0 $60 $0 $4,010,618 Texas A&M International $16,975 $33,306 $302,553 $0 $3,951 $677,346 Texas A&M-Kingsville $854 $3,678 $19,918 $0 $274,248 $8,591,828 Texas A&M-Texarkana $0 $0 $212,252 $0 $0 $212,252 West Texas A&M $32,016 $392,457 $345,829 $8,436 $2,285 $6,036,713 Texas Southern $0 $0 $0 $0 $741,278 $4,930,117 Texas State University System Angelo State $28,247 $0 $35,020 $0 $0 $800,044 Lamar $0 $0 $207,118 $0 $453,351 $4,237,915 Sam Houston State $0 $0 $0 $132,625 $0 $1,931,014 Southwest Texas State $220,919 $145,903 $1,523,046 $52,457 $350,297 $10,400,827 Sul Ross State $0 $72,315 $2,515 $0 $65,302 $841,426 Sul Ross - Rio Grande $10,464 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,464 Texas Tech $20,013 $330,056 $230,174 $20,507 $0 $51,701,449 Texas Woman's $2,336 $609 $89,735 $0 $13,452 $2,960,015 University of Texas System UT at Arlington $64,296 $23,183 $59,977 $293,068 $1,718,221 $21,072,964 UT at Austin $3,071,561 $2,987,182 $13,125,648 $2,099,329 $16,733,949 $366,355,359 UT at Brownsville $0 $0 $134,012 $0 $5,988 $1,286,638 UT at Dallas $569,064 $401,615 $186,808 $0 $0 $27,444,057 UT at El Paso $6,173 $109,433 $4,377,029 $222,318 $2,530,445 $27,328,772 UT-Pan American $119,644 $19,175 $125,573 $4,982 $0 $2,605,758 UT of the Permian Basin $13,337 $495,690 $98,722 $0 $120,287 $980,905 UT at San Antonio $201,317 $566,954 $557,184 $78,961 $0 $12,402,017 UT at Tyler $41,011 $85,913 $0 $0 $12,125 $375,821 University of Houston System Univ. of Houston $1,140,060 $555,298 $6,861,092 $516,749 $6,088,411 $82,865,307 Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake $3,480 $131,464 $7,470 $0 $362,124 $8,862,208 Univ. of Houston-Downtown $0 $6,630 $15,067 $22,393 $172,379 $1,270,494 Univ. of Houston-Victoria $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 University of North Texas $60,613 $229,930 $3,464,467 $567,785 $0 $12,887,516 Totals $6,794,773 $10,584,604 $39,152,982 $5,522,459 $31,194,881 $1,070,801,456 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. * A&M agency and research foundation expenditures reported by individual affiliated university. 20

Table 10 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Area of Special Interest, FY 2002 Texas Public Universities Institution Aerospace Technology Biotechnology Energy Environmental Sciences Food, Fiber, Agricultural Products Midwestern State $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Stephen F. Austin State $0 $1,263,522 $0 $4,259,919 $4,181,635 Texas A&M University System* Prairie View A&M $263,053 $0 $57,251 $0 $172,398 Tarleton State $0 $0 $0 $2,803,920 $0 Texas A&M and Services $1,296,406 $52,206,609 $3,909,032 $7,677,604 $49,249,264 Texas A&M-Commerce $0 $0 $0 $0 $116,021 Texas A&M-Corpus Christi $0 $74,338 $0 $1,919,839 $65,711 Texas A&M at Galveston $0 $0 $0 $417,776 $0 Texas A&M International $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Texas A&M-Kingsville $145,499 $870,234 $548,951 $1,322,457 $4,829,963 Texas A&M-Texarkana $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 West Texas A&M $0 $0 $277,759 $2,272,169 $1,374,205 Texas Southern $0 $0 $262,650 $0 $0 Texas State University System Angelo State $0 $0 $0 $0 $480,885 Lamar $110,045 $0 $0 $2,276,645 $0 Sam Houston State $0 $0 $0 $602,442 $0 Southwest Texas State $53,257 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sul Ross State $0 $45,902 $0 $0 $0 Sul Ross - Rio Grande $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Texas Tech $2,963,970 $5,174,771 $6,423,926 $14,721,045 $14,127,946 Texas Woman's $0 $0 $0 $0 $294,641 University of Texas System UT at Arlington $185,266 $0 $1,053,514 $563,828 $0 UT at Austin $10,038,396 $18,737,982 $28,476,859 $37,151,741 $543,402 UT at Brownsville $369,779 $228,467 $0 $47,092 $80,561 UT at Dallas $3,326,419 $4,835,636 $1,077,199 $1,325,489 $112,078 UT at El Paso $205,697 $21,289 $280,200 $3,717,640 $0 UT-Pan American $395 $40,633 $0 $47,591 $42,839 UT of the Permian Basin $0 $0 $42,207 $22,899 $20,520 UT at San Antonio $107,032 $0 $0 $351,566 $0 UT at Tyler $14,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 University of Houston System Univ. of Houston $3,031,010 $6,365,256 $5,223,612 $5,850,858 $66,001 Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake $7,463,280 $0 $0 $242,931 $0 Univ. of Houston-Downtown $71,104 $0 $0 $5,091 $21,936 Univ. of Houston-Victoria $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 University of North Texas $26,576 $1,013,844 $232,896 $745,856 $225,172 Totals $29,671,517 $90,878,483 $47,866,056 $88,346,398 $76,005,178 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. * A&M agency and research foundation expenditures reported by individual affiliated university. (table continued on next page) 21

Table 10 - continued Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Area of Special Interest, FY 2002 Texas Public Universities Institution Manufacturing Technology Materials Science Microelectronics and Computer Technology Water Resources Total Midwestern State $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Stephen F. Austin State $237,818 $0 $102,927 $3,187,650 $13,233,471 Texas A&M University System* Prairie View A&M $0 $78,643 $35,555 $0 $606,900 Tarleton State $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,803,920 Texas A&M and Services $2,323,688 $3,931,308 $8,692,893 $4,808,117 $134,094,921 Texas A&M-Commerce $0 $0 $7,149 $0 $123,170 Texas A&M-Corpus Christi $181,574 $0 $161,902 $550,969 $2,954,333 Texas A&M at Galveston $0 $0 $0 $0 $417,776 Texas A&M International $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Texas A&M-Kingsville $1,874 $145,346 $25,509 $25,765 $7,915,598 Texas A&M-Texarkana $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 West Texas A&M $0 $30,466 $2,000 $22,387 $3,978,986 Texas Southern $0 $0 $22,493 $0 $285,143 Texas State University System Angelo State $0 $125,043 $0 $16,969 $622,897 Lamar $60,026 $0 $75,996 $0 $2,522,712 Sam Houston State $0 $0 $0 $279,719 $882,161 Southwest Texas State $0 $52,575 $0 $2,325 $108,157 Sul Ross State $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,902 Sul Ross - Rio Grande $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Texas Tech $2,728,040 $7,057,914 $4,392,392 $3,168,703 $60,758,707 Texas Woman's $0 $0 $0 $0 $294,641 University of Texas System UT at Arlington $145,762 $579,770 $10,666 $78,143 $2,616,949 UT at Austin $980,125 $16,894,032 $32,953,324 $1,758,585 $147,534,446 UT at Brownsville $59,390 $0 $0 $36,917 $822,206 UT at Dallas $388,370 $1,059,917 $5,559,355 $150,000 $17,834,463 UT at El Paso $96,737 $1,392,021 $429,723 $91,893 $6,235,200 UT-Pan American $527,009 $0 $74,270 $3,752 $736,489 UT of the Permian Basin $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,626 UT at San Antonio $0 $0 $400,746 $61,875 $921,219 UT at Tyler $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,333 University of Houston System Univ. of Houston $1,065,229 $7,371,078 $4,241,986 $5,252 $33,220,282 Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake $0 $0 $379,485 $0 $8,085,696 Univ. of Houston-Downtown $0 $0 $316,086 $0 $414,217 Univ. of Houston-Victoria $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 University of North Texas $344,196 $1,799,289 $1,975,546 $53,769 $6,417,144 Totals $9,139,838 $40,517,402 $59,860,003 $14,302,790 $456,587,665 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. * A&M agency and research foundation expenditures reported by individual affiliated university. 22

INSTITUTIONAL DATA HEALTH-RELATED INSTITUTIONS This section of the report contains detailed information on research expenses reported by individual health-related institutions. Statements related to data quality and applicability found on page 1 of this report also apply to the data shown in this section of the report. Figure 7 Expenditures for Research and Development at Texas Public Health-Related Institutions, FY 2002 (Millions of Dollars) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 UT Health Center at Tyler 8.5 Univ North Texas HSC 12.3 Texas Tech Univ HSC 19.3 Texas A&M HSC 45.1 UT Medical Branch at Galveston 109.1 UTHSC at San Antonio 112.2 UTHSC at Houston 140.8 UT M.D. Anderson Cancer 262.1 UT Southwestern Medical Center 264.0 23

Table 11 Total Expenditures for Sponsored Programs by Source of Funds, FY 2002 State Federal Institution Appropriated Contracts and Grants R&D Other R&D Other R&D Other Texas A&M HSC $22,417,418 $0 $7,774,255 $0 $4,528,441 $0 Texas Tech Univ HSC $8,802,283 $0 $2,902,150 $0 $394,242 $0 Univ North Texas HSC $7,224,263 $887,119 $0 $0 $479,099 $0 UT M.D. Anderson Cancer $117,633,074 $0 $70,160,680 $0 $994,490 $0 UTMB at Galveston $78,100,188 $0 $8,399,231 $4,889,935 $4,041,868 $0 UTHSC at Houston $101,738,767 $0 $8,598,302 $610,231 $3,609,111 $0 UT Health Center at Tyler $2,783,554 $0 $1,541,974 $226,557 $0 $0 UTHSC at San Antonio $83,760,708 $0 $5,625,944 $0 $580,187 $0 UT Southwestern Medical Center $155,257,992 $0 $14,856,627 $0 $2,215,844 $0 Totals $577,718,247 $887,119 $119,859,163 $5,726,723 $16,843,282 $0 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. Table 11 - continued Total Expenditures for Sponsored Programs by Source of Funds, FY 2002 Institution Institution Private, Profit Private, Non-Profit R&D Other R&D Other R&D Other Texas A&M HSC $3,211,277 $0 $2,005,485 $0 $5,129,693 $0 Texas Tech Univ HSC $3,453,730 $0 $1,270,367 $0 $2,457,025 $6,076 Univ North Texas HSC $2,589,552 $0 $1,015,552 $5,336 $1,038,675 $5,287 UT M.D. Anderson Cancer $12,992,227 $4,069,010 $33,406,869 $0 $26,957,620 $0 UTMB at Galveston $546,613 $422,831 $5,737,248 $0 $12,314,390 $84,638 UTHSC at Houston $1,919,082 $0 $11,241,329 $0 $13,721,135 $0 UT Health Center at Tyler $2,922,238 $233,925 $228,833 $0 $977,110 $0 UTHSC at San Antonio $3,293,103 $828,297 $10,773,388 $0 $8,199,323 $0 UT Southwestern Medical Center $7,573,446 $958,903 $13,162,093 $0 $70,892,408 $0 Totals $38,501,268 $6,512,966 $78,841,164 $5,336 $141,687,379 $96,001 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. Table 11 - continued Total Expenditures for Sponsored Programs by Source of Funds, FY 2002 Institution Total R&D Other Total Texas A&M HSC $45,066,569 $0 $45,066,569 Texas Tech Univ HSC $19,279,797 $6,076 $19,285,873 Univ North Texas HSC $12,347,141 $897,742 $13,244,883 UT M.D. Anderson Cancer $262,144,960 $4,069,010 $266,213,970 UTMB at Galveston $109,139,538 $5,397,404 $114,536,942 UTHSC at Houston $140,827,726 $610,231 $141,437,957 UT Health Center at Tyler $8,453,709 $460,482 $8,914,191 UTHSC at San Antonio $112,232,653 $828,297 $113,060,950 UT Southwestern Medical Center $263,958,410 $958,903 $264,917,313 Totals $973,450,503 $13,228,145 $986,678,648 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. 24

Table 12 Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Field, FY 2002 Texas Public Health-Related Institutions Institution Biological and Other Life Sciences Computer Science Engineering Environmental Sciences Mathematical Sciences Texas A&M HSC $66,903 $270 $461,796 $134,994 $0 Texas Tech Univ HSC $5,587,607 $0 $0 $0 $0 Univ North Texas HSC $9,834,797 $0 $0 $0 $0 UT M.D. Anderson Cancer $98,147,538 $0 $0 $0 $10,346,553 UTMB at Galveston $57,228,035 $0 $1,977,077 $0 $0 UTHSC at Houston $23,873,295 $0 $0 $0 $0 UT Health Center at Tyler $0 $0 $0 $64,704 $0 UTHSC at San Antonio $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 UT Southwestern Medical Center $124,359,226 $0 $0 $0 $0 Totals $319,097,401 $270 $2,438,873 $199,698 $10,346,553 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. Table 12 - continued Expenditures for Conduct of R&D by Field, FY 2002 Texas Public Health-Related Institutions Institution Medical Sciences Physical Sciences Other Sciences Arts and Humanities Total Texas A&M HSC $44,228,791 $78,387 $0 $0 $44,971,141 Texas Tech Univ HSC $13,692,190 $0 $0 $0 $19,279,797 Univ North Texas HSC $2,512,344 $0 $0 $0 $12,347,141 UT M.D. Anderson Cancer $148,715,013 $4,935,856 $0 $0 $262,144,960 UTMB at Galveston $49,776,885 $0 $0 $157,541 $109,139,538 UTHSC at Houston $116,954,431 $0 $0 $0 $140,827,726 UT Health Center at Tyler $8,389,005 $0 $0 $0 $8,453,709 UTHSC at San Antonio $112,232,653 $0 $0 $0 $112,232,653 UT Southwestern Medical Center $138,276,357 $0 $1,322,827 $0 $263,958,410 Totals $634,777,669 $5,014,243 $1,322,827 $157,541 $973,355,075 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. 25

Table 13 Expenditures for Research and Development by Area of Special Interest, FY 2002 Texas Public Health-Related Institutions Institution Texas A&M HSC $275,415 $2,887,152 $5,905,266 $3,684,329 Texas Tech Univ HSC $1,212,293 $2,420,846 $0 $0 Univ North Texas HSC $1,063,442 $699,023 $2,436,504 $0 UT M.D. Anderson Cancer $0 $262,144,960 $0 $0 UTMB at Galveston $12,787,568 $15,900,711 $6,088,239 $6,476,390 UTHSC at Houston $4,357,554 $2,276,758 $10,837,502 $12,563,160 UT Health Center at Tyler $0 $99,775 $0 $0 UTHSC at San Antonio $9,696,552 $12,098,116 $7,992,841 $1,044,647 UT Southwestern Medical Center $4,876,622 $22,665,277 $27,874,910 $5,843,842 Totals $34,269,446 $321,192,618 $61,135,262 $29,612,368 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. Aging Cancer Research Cardiovascular Research Child Health and Human Development Table 13 - continued Expenditures for Research and Development by Area of Special Interest, FY 2002 Texas Public Health-Related Institutions Institution Mental Health Substance Abuse Total Texas A&M HSC $389,823 $1,543,611 $14,685,596 Texas Tech Univ HSC $1,212,320 $512,187 $5,357,646 Univ North Texas HSC $0 $1,154,997 $5,353,966 UT M.D. Anderson Cancer $0 $0 $262,144,960 UTMB at Galveston $7,095,229 $2,672,903 $51,021,040 UTHSC at Houston $3,384,327 $4,053,168 $37,472,469 UT Health Center at Tyler $0 $0 $99,775 UTHSC at San Antonio $2,835,459 $17,865,395 $51,533,010 UT Southwestern Medical Center $10,308,493 $662,234 $72,231,378 Totals $25,225,651 $28,464,495 $499,899,840 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. 26

HISTORICAL DATA Much of the data in this report does not allow accurate comparisons with data contained in reports prior to 1990. Since then, many individual data items have been more rigorously defined. Total research expenditures is the statistic allowing the most accurate long-term comparison. However, because a more precise and more conservative definition of research activity was adopted, research expenditures for Fiscal Years 1990 through 2002 are probably understated when compared to expenditures reported in previous years. Figure 8 graphs total research and development expenditures since 1982. Figure 8 2,000 Expenditures for Research and Development FY 1982-2002 2,044 1,800 1,770 (Millions of Dollars) 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 337 372 407 470 543 610 686 797 861 959 1,044 1,137 1,177 1,211 1,266 1,323 1,381 1,452 1,603 200 0 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 Fiscal Year Universities Health-Related Institutions Table 14 on the following page shows total research and development expenditures at Texas public universities over the past four years. Table 15 shows federal research and development expenditures and the ratio of federal-to-state research and development expenditures over the past four years. Tables 16 and 17 show similar data for health-related institutions. One-year and five-year changes in federal expenditures for research and development for the different disciplines are shown in Table 18. 27

Table 14 Expenditures for Research and Development Texas Public Universities Institution FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 Percent Change* Midwestern State $106,729 $101,935 $93,085 $74,626-30.08% Stephen F. Austin State ** $4,790,743 $5,174,108 $4,840,607 $5,583,051 16.54% Texas A&M University System Prairie View A&M $9,218,584 $8,795,343 $9,201,307 $10,330,085 12.06% Tarleton State $3,464,450 $3,504,054 $6,495,956 $7,909,999 128.32% Texas A&M and Services $334,890,628 $331,027,971 $340,660,614 $372,828,854 11.33% Texas A&M-Commerce $490,899 $414,154 $336,803 $629,496 28.23% Texas A&M-Corpus Christi $838,596 $3,517,134 $6,710,930 $10,365,501 1136.05% Texas A&M at Galveston $3,060,639 $2,948,270 $3,252,082 $4,010,618 31.04% Texas A&M International $418,575 $396,428 $507,806 $677,346 61.82% Texas A&M-Kingsville $6,618,986 $7,163,871 $7,144,715 $8,591,828 29.81% Texas A&M-Texarkana $0 $0 $0 $212,252 NA West Texas A&M $1,492,382 $1,778,857 $4,744,757 $6,036,713 304.50% Texas Southern $2,954,923 $2,595,995 $3,048,521 $4,930,117 66.84% Texas State University System Angelo State $510,809 $524,986 $643,460 $800,044 56.62% Lamar $3,740,574 $3,204,061 $3,441,465 $4,237,915 13.30% Sam Houston State $4,550,751 $3,156,084 $2,281,435 $1,931,014-57.57% Southwest Texas State $5,661,303 $9,127,901 $11,652,513 $10,400,827 83.72% Sul Ross State $620,550 $796,408 $773,021 $841,426 35.59% Sul Ross - Rio Grande $9,058 $0 $6,277 $10,464 15.52% Texas Tech $40,104,672 $44,110,624 $43,373,437 $51,701,449 28.92% Texas Woman's $2,258,921 $3,143,775 $3,023,439 $2,960,015 31.04% University of Texas System UT at Arlington $13,589,868 $14,552,315 $19,966,034 $21,072,964 55.06% UT at Austin $265,121,990 $295,901,287 $321,580,736 $366,355,359 38.18% UT at Brownsville $56,104 $299,359 $635,365 $1,286,638 2193.31% UT at Dallas $13,676,687 $15,923,269 $18,531,582 $27,444,057 100.66% UT at El Paso $27,754,725 $27,784,046 $29,003,608 $27,328,772-1.53% UT-Pan American $2,296,623 $2,175,562 $2,601,598 $2,605,758 13.46% UT of the Permian Basin $752,051 $811,973 $737,853 $980,905 30.43% UT at San Antonio $7,914,116 $10,613,082 $11,751,323 $12,402,017 56.71% UT at Tyler $88,010 $210,747 $342,206 $375,821 327.02% University of Houston System Univ. of Houston $52,200,984 $58,729,892 $61,332,253 $82,865,307 58.74% Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake $6,347,244 $7,597,590 $11,928,221 $8,862,208 39.62% Univ. of Houston-Downtown $701,508 $588,328 $1,016,352 $1,270,494 81.11% Univ. of Houston-Victoria $0 $0 $0 $0 NA University of North Texas $12,891,033 $14,601,146 $17,441,681 $12,887,516-0.03% Totals $829,193,715 $881,270,555 $948,223,316 $1,070,801,456 29.14% * Percent change for 2002, relative to 1999; NA indicates not applicable ** Stephen F. Austin State University reported corrections to FY 2001 research expenditures: total research expenditures = $4,840,607; from institutional sources = $877,726; and expenditures for agricultural sciences = $797,344; physical sciences = $162,323; biological sciences = $152,562; and arts and humanities = $117,719. 28

Institution Table 15 Federal Expenditures for Research and Development Texas Public Universities Federal R&D Dollars Fed/ State Ratio Federal R&D Dollars Fed/ State Ratio Federal R&D Dollars Fed/ State Ratio Federal R&D Dollars Fed/ State Ratio Midwestern State $42,359 4.91 $37,293 1.64 $25,500 1.12 $0 NA Stephen F. Austin State $775,560 5.00 $521,123 0.93 $959,198 2.65 $1,054,239 11.58 Texas A&M University System Prairie View A&M $8,773,141 37.20 $7,812,509 9.87 $7,247,020 4.09 $7,915,204 3.61 Tarleton State $1,531,022 0.84 $1,425,780 0.74 $4,321,656 2.22 $5,431,723 2.42 Texas A&M and Services $145,366,594 1.52 $150,341,703 1.56 $152,196,825 1.46 $166,285,925 1.41 Texas A&M-Commerce $118,668 1.07 $175,163 2.23 $114,497 1.77 $315,173 3.02 Texas A&M-Corpus Christi $383,507 2.24 $922,819 0.42 $2,805,448 0.88 $4,473,974 1.11 Texas A&M at Galveston $1,384,321 1.77 $1,340,939 1.56 $1,567,592 1.52 $2,362,832 2.24 Texas A&M International $101,124 0.35 $232,757 4.42 $376,032 8.03 $572,462 32.73 Texas A&M-Kingsville $1,770,786 0.59 $2,050,146 0.67 $1,818,310 0.62 $1,950,923 0.45 Texas A&M-Texarkana $0 NA $0 NA $0 NA $182,262 NA West Texas A&M $99,996 0.08 $147,735 0.10 $2,900,437 1.79 $3,531,219 1.67 Texas Southern $2,431,236 6.67 $2,002,349 4.71 $2,051,797 2.93 $4,147,663 6.16 Texas State University System Angelo State $10,583 0.02 $37,445 0.08 $111,424 0.24 $254,963 0.55 Lamar $2,914,687 3.96 $2,329,531 3.25 $2,216,829 2.48 $2,279,805 1.55 Sam Houston State $3,557,061 5.73 $2,132,294 14.81 $1,802,777 11.97 $1,491,475 4.51 Southwest Texas State $3,444,132 2.67 $6,460,981 4.54 $4,961,466 1.12 $4,769,709 1.23 Sul Ross State $74,277 0.17 $228,234 0.47 $95,043 0.16 $76,368 0.12 Sul Ross - Rio Grande $0 0.00 $0 NA $0 0.00 $0 0.00 Texas Tech $17,219,633 1.25 $17,860,045 1.13 $17,394,677 1.08 $20,511,493 0.96 Texas Woman's $1,306,319 1.63 $1,440,415 1.27 $1,185,256 0.76 $1,321,373 1.04 University of Texas System UT at Arlington $6,289,004 1.34 $5,242,897 0.84 $9,224,210 1.61 $7,923,657 0.83 UT at Austin $159,245,662 4.10 $185,190,446 3.69 $202,440,085 4.28 $235,436,101 4.46 UT at Brownsville $21,857 0.64 $241,980 4.22 $602,856 18.54 $896,646 430.67 UT at Dallas $7,192,600 3.96 $7,049,617 2.25 $8,781,295 2.14 $11,815,490 1.40 UT at El Paso $23,871,116 7.54 $22,972,030 7.17 $22,872,682 6.98 $19,796,441 4.65 UT-Pan American $1,077,255 1.11 $1,149,325 1.38 $1,324,426 1.33 $1,394,780 1.53 UT of the Permian Basin $155,219 0.39 $233,075 0.54 $147,629 0.34 $138,194 0.20 UT at San Antonio $5,480,519 3.25 $7,421,650 3.31 $8,032,790 3.11 $7,641,990 2.17 UT at Tyler $22,519 1.82 $63,307 0.67 $66,827 0.32 $67,617 0.31 University of Houston System Univ. of Houston $23,479,128 1.39 $24,887,466 1.31 $24,227,166 1.08 $33,239,410 1.16 Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake $5,565,256 11.18 $6,647,437 12.17 $10,843,892 19.72 $7,659,934 10.99 Univ. of Houston-Downtown $563,024 4.11 $441,926 3.02 $649,135 2.08 $783,394 2.00 Univ. of Houston-Victoria $0 NA $0 NA $0 NA $0 NA University of North Texas $5,200,725 2.59 $7,301,680 2.98 $8,284,082 1.78 $8,827,975 6.80 Totals $429,468,890 2.22 $466,342,097 2.15 $501,648,859 2.14 $564,550,414 2.05 NA indicates not applicable (no state research and development funds expended). FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 29

Institution Table 16 Expenditures for Research and Development Texas Public Health-Related Institutions FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 TAMU College of Medicine $6,957,100 NA NA NA NA TAMUS Baylor College of Dentistry $2,848,344 NA NA NA NA Texas A&M HSC** NA $24,335,023 $37,328,465 $45,066,569 NA Texas Tech Univ HSC $8,945,802 $10,868,500 $14,343,187 $19,279,797 115.52% Univ North Texas HSC $9,688,816 $10,130,753 $11,034,554 $12,347,141 27.44% UT M.D. Anderson Cancer $155,126,397 $182,196,490 $210,236,589 $262,144,960 68.99% UTMB at Galveston $83,236,093 $87,146,267 $91,088,019 $109,139,538 31.12% UTHSC at Houston $106,703,163 $122,914,171 $128,161,248 $140,827,726 31.98% UT Health Center at Tyler $8,256,219 $8,402,408 $9,228,568 $8,453,709 2.39% UTHSC at San Antonio $77,247,996 $86,074,434 $97,638,253 $112,232,653 45.29% UT Southwestern Medical Center $163,518,455 $189,216,337 $222,378,235 $263,958,410 61.42% Totals $622,528,385 $721,284,383 $821,437,118 $973,450,503 56.37% NA indicates not applicable * Percent change for 2002, relative to 1999 **TAMU College of Medicine combined with TAMUS Baylor College of Dentistry to form Texas A&M HSC in FY2000. FY 2002 Percent Change* Institution Federal R&D Dollars Fed/S tate Ratio Table 17 Federal Expenditures for Research and Development Texas Public Health-Related Institutions FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 Federal R&D Dollars Fed/S tate Ratio Federal R&D Dollars Fed/S tate Ratio Federal R&D Dollars TAMU College of Medicine $3,385,338 2.50 NA NA NA NA NA NA TAMUS Baylor College of Dentistry $1,480,612 4.54 NA NA NA NA NA NA Texas A&M HSC* NA NA $14,320,534 2.24 $18,384,358 2.34 $22,417,418 1.82 Texas Tech Univ HSC $3,360,508 1.30 $4,178,058 1.47 $6,457,506 2.44 $8,802,283 2.67 Univ North Texas HSC $5,370,431 9.15 $5,798,287 4.60 $6,562,238 36.53 $7,224,263 15.08 UT M.D. Anderson Cancer $69,412,772 1.37 $81,871,561 1.62 $91,543,036 1.56 $117,633,074 1.65 UTMB at Galveston $55,061,209 5.68 $61,356,467 7.14 $63,274,494 5.87 $78,100,188 6.28 UTHSC at Houston $72,684,140 10.61 $82,991,431 8.49 $91,267,003 8.46 $101,738,767 8.33 UT Health Center at Tyler $2,297,638 0.61 $2,807,980 1.36 $3,063,099 3.45 $2,783,554 1.81 UTHSC at San Antonio $54,128,757 8.06 $58,600,224 10.08 $66,852,477 10.38 $83,760,708 13.50 UT Southwestern Medical Center $99,994,840 18.23 $109,165,343 9.64 $131,820,109 13.85 $155,257,992 9.09 Totals $367,176,245 4.18 $421,089,885 4.26 $479,224,320 4.44 $577,718,247 4.23 NA indicates not applicable *TAMU College of Medicine combined with TAMUS Baylor College of Dentistry to form Texas A&M HSC in FY2000. FY 2002 Fed/S tate Ratio 30

Field Table 18 Federal Expenditures for Research and Development by Field Texas Public Universities and Health-Related Institutions FY 1997 FY 2001 FY 2002 One-Year Change Five-Year Change Agricultural Sciences $20,630,540 $22,801,462 $25,352,992 11.19% 22.89% Biological and Other Life Sciences $79,759,210 $216,534,637 $260,564,270 20.33% 226.69% Computer Science $27,554,738 $23,355,906 $31,440,414 34.61% 14.10% Engineering $131,395,899 $136,704,012 $155,461,426 13.72% 18.32% Environmental Sciences $74,162,768 $89,098,895 $91,715,782 2.94% 23.67% Mathematical Sciences $8,000,494 $20,341,750 $26,934,849 32.41% 236.66% Medical Sciences $286,617,195 $335,902,604 $401,490,302 19.53% 40.08% Physical Sciences $71,488,813 $71,679,380 $79,873,134 11.43% 11.73% Psychology $7,223,920 $9,003,214 $15,332,253 70.30% 112.24% Social Sciences $13,283,215 $15,466,920 $13,416,477-13.26% 1.00% Other Sciences $857,987 $5,614,753 $6,835,106 21.73% 696.64% Arts and Humanities $730,675 $1,276,581 $948,930-25.67% 29.87% Business Administration $4,113,765 $2,223,926 $2,502,075 12.51% -39.18% Education $9,757,335 $25,176,460 $24,348,321-3.29% 149.54% Law and Public Administration $1,064,778 $2,327,220 $1,753,585-24.65% 64.69% Other Non-Science Activities $1,393,688 $3,365,459 $4,309,209 28.04% 209.19% Totals $738,035,020 $980,873,179 $1,142,279,125 16.46% 54.77% In 2001, the 77th Legislature passed the Centers for Technology Development and Transfer Act, which specifies reporting requirements for intellectual property income and expenses. Intellectual property income is now reported biennially in a new report, Technology Development and Transfer. 31

NATIONAL COMPARISONS This section of the report is based on data provided by the National Science Foundation. It is not entirely consistent with data provided in earlier sections of the report because it is based on an earlier year, because reporting requirements are somewhat different, and because the federal reports do not differentiate between state-funded and independent institutions. The National Science Foundation makes three reports available, and each provides somewhat different information: Federal Obligations for Science and Engineering shows federal obligations for grants and contracts awarded to higher education science and engineering programs by federal agencies during the fiscal year. Funds obligated in any given year may be expended over a number of years, so obligations will be somewhat different from expenditures. This report includes support for a number of programs that are not necessarily research and development programs, such as science education programs and assistantship support for engineering students. The amount of support is reported by the agencies. Data from this report measures progress toward the research goal of Closing the Gaps by 2015. Federal Obligations for Research and Development in Science and Engineering includes only federal funds obligated during the year to support, directly or indirectly, basic and applied research and development in science and engineering disciplines at higher education institutions. The amount of support is again reported by the agencies. Federally Financed Research and Development Expenditures summarizes federal funds expenditures by higher education institutions to support research and development in any given year. This report is based on data reported by institutions and summarized by the National Science Foundation. Some of the highlights of the 2000 survey of federal research and development expenditures include the following: o o o o The top five states in federal research and development expenditures were: California $2.34 billion New York $1.48 billion Texas $1.10 billion Maryland $1.09 billion Massachusetts $1.06 billion Texas ranked second (behind California) in state- and local government-funded expenditures. Texas ranked third in total R&D expenditures. Texas ranked third in R&D expenditures from institutional sources (behind California and New York), third in industrial sources (behind California and North Carolina), and third in R&D expenditures from all other sources (behind California and New York). 32

o o Texas was among the top three states for all of the different types of sources. In Texas, life sciences accounted for 65 percent of the R&D expenditures, followed by engineering (15 percent) and environmental sciences (7 percent). Table 19 Top Five States in Federal R&D Expenditures Selected Science and Engineering Fields, FY 2000 Rank Life Physical Environmental $ Engineering $ $ Sciences Sciences Sciences $ 1 California 1.2B California 336M California 351M California 157M 2 New York 987M Maryland 296M Massachusetts 171M Massachusetts 97M 3 Texas 711M Massachusetts 165M New York 146M Texas 87M 4 Pennsylvania 657M Pennsylvania 163M Maryland 134M New York 70M 5 Massachusetts 515M New York 147M Illinois 91M Colorado 69M Source: National Science Foundation, WebCASPAR Database System, 02/24/2002 Table 20 shows the ranking of all states in federal R&D obligations and federally financed R&D expenditures for 2000. Texas ranks sixth in federal obligations for science and engineering, which includes science education, and also ranks sixth in federal obligations for research and development in science and engineering, which excludes science education. Texas ranks third in research and development expenditures from federal sources. Patterns in R&D support over time for the top six states are shown in Figures 9 and 10. California and New York are the uncontested leaders in federal research support to the states. State Table 20 State Rank in Federal Obligations and Federally Financed R&D, FY 2000 (Dollars in Thousands) Federal Obligations for Federal Obligations for R&D Federally Financed R&D Science and Engineering to in Science and Engineering Expenditures at Colleges Colleges and Universities to Colleges and Universities and Universities FY 2000 Rank FY 2000 Rank FY 2000 Rank California $2,790,716 1 $2,517,086 1 $2,335,093 1 New York $1,596,912 2 $1,410,518 2 $1,475,423 2 Maryland $1,227,458 3 $1,051,387 4 $1,090,445 4 Pennsylvania $1,189,920 4 $1,082,830 3 $1,032,963 6 Massachusetts $1,126,975 5 $998,935 5 $1,064,468 5 Texas $1,107,264 6 $958,185 6 $1,101,463 3 North Carolina $724,721 7 $636,881 7 $577,437 8 Illinois $704,479 8 $615,198 8 $681,006 7 Michigan $602,025 9 $532,619 9 $553,119 9 Colorado $548,464 10 $441,435 12 $427,495 12 Ohio $547,739 11 $495,744 10 $498,967 10 Washington $509,434 12 $444,763 11 $443,223 11 (table continued on next page) 33

Table 20 - continued State Rank in Federal Obligations and Federally Financed R&D, FY 2000 (Dollars in Thousands) Federal Obligations for Federal Obligations for R&D in Federally Financed R&D Science and Engineering Science and Engineering Expenditures at Colleges to Colleges and Universities to Colleges and Universities and Universities State FY 2000 Rank FY 2000 Florida $481,383 13 $420,896 13 $408,826 14 Missouri $466,775 14 $403,780 14 $371,713 15 Georgia $414,240 15 $340,688 16 $417,664 13 Wisconsin $407,353 16 $355,986 15 $348,779 16 Connecticut $358,354 17 $330,699 17 $304,155 18 Virginia $333,608 18 $283,703 19 $321,690 17 Alabama $327,963 19 $280,642 20 $275,912 19 New Jersey $319,792 20 $285,633 18 $257,445 20 Minnesota $317,240 21 $279,295 21 $233,018 24 Tennessee $284,176 22 $236,778 23 $240,337 23 Indiana $279,113 23 $248,253 22 $228,768 25 Oregon $254,664 24 $224,744 24 $246,684 21 Arizona $245,817 25 $214,768 25 $244,938 22 Iowa $223,637 26 $189,852 26 $203,437 26 Utah $198,702 27 $183,107 27 $192,100 27 District of Columbia $178,063 28 $161,206 28 $186,632 28 Louisiana $165,911 29 $141,723 29 $169,895 30 New Mexico $162,663 30 $120,935 31 $175,028 29 Mississippi $156,106 31 $116,722 32 $117,168 32 South Carolina $153,135 32 $121,398 30 $131,043 31 Kentucky $138,450 33 $112,669 33 $96,288 34 Kansas $117,480 34 $96,928 35 $105,610 33 New Hampshire $111,700 35 $98,809 34 $95,290 36 Oklahoma $110,431 36 $74,315 38 $93,434 37 Hawaii $100,392 37 $81,332 37 $95,419 35 Rhode Island $99,414 38 $86,536 36 $88,510 38 Nebraska $82,853 39 $62,822 40 $65,702 39 Arkansas $80,945 40 $64,331 39 $58,302 41 Vermont $66,531 41 $56,766 41 $41,232 44 Montana $63,440 42 $47,095 44 $51,686 42 Alaska $63,195 43 $50,961 43 $49,241 43 Nevada $61,036 44 $54,548 42 $60,005 40 West Virginia $58,486 45 $41,204 46 $33,972 46 Delaware $55,668 46 $46,158 45 $40,768 45 North Dakota $43,613 47 $33,133 47 $29,343 47 Idaho $38,543 48 $28,560 48 $28,888 48 South Dakota $33,130 49 $21,590 50 $13,659 51 Maine $32,606 50 $25,228 49 $25,309 49 Wyoming $26,793 51 $20,501 51 $16,556 50 SOURCE: National Science Foundation, WebCASPAR Database System, 02/24/2003 34 Rank FY 2000 Rank

Figure 9 2,500 Federal Obligations for R&D in Science and Engineering Universities and Colleges - Selected States, 1991-2000 2,000 California Millions 1,500 Dollars in 1,000 Maryland Massachusetts New York Texas 500 Pennsylvania 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Year SOURCE: National Science Foundation WebCASPAR Database System, Constant 1996 Dollars, 02/24/2003 Figure 10 2,500 Federally Financed R&D Expenditures Universities and Colleges - Selected States, 1991-2000 2,000 California Dollars in Millions 1,500 1,000 New York Maryland Massachusetts Texas 500 Pennsylvania 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Year SOURCE: National Science Foundation WebCASPAR Database System, Constant 1996 Dollars, 02/24/2003 35

Table 21 shows federal obligations and federally financed R&D expenditures for Texas higher education institutions for FY 2000. The table includes public and independent institutions. In all cases, the top five institutions account for 60-63 percent of the total federal support. Table 21 Federal Obligations and Federally Financed R&D by Texas Institutions, FY 2000 (Dollars in Thousands) Institution Abilene Christian $130 $130 $165 Alamo Community Coll. Dist. $574 $274 --- Angelo State $177 $177 --- Austin Community Coll. $374 --- --- Baylor-Dentistry --- --- $1,380 Baylor- Coll. of Medicine $197,295 $172,333 $193,249 Baylor Univ. $418 $353 $353 Central Texas Coll. $90 $90 --- Coll. of the Mainland $309 --- --- Collin County Community Coll. $324 --- --- El Paso Community Coll. $592 $592 --- Houston Community Coll. $1,628 $143 --- Jarvis Christian Coll. $100 --- $55 Lamar $75 --- $2,330 Le Tourneau Univ. $16 $16 --- North Central Texas Coll. $178 $178 --- Odessa Coll. $860 --- --- Our Lady of the Lake $435 $435 --- Prarie View A&M $11,737 $7,283 $7,679 Rice $27,929 $26,374 $35,144 San Jacinto Coll. $150 --- --- Sam Houston State $645 $645 $2,128 South Texas Community Coll. $1,674 $38 --- Southern Methodist $5,424 $5,356 $6,302 Southwest Texas Junior Coll. $99 --- --- Southwest Texas State $4,101 $3,165 $3,519 St Edwards Univ. $300 --- --- St Mary's $582 $212 $62 Stephen F. Austin State $550 $550 $521 Sul Ross State --- --- $228 Tarleton State $2,000 $2,000 $1,426 Texas A&M and Services $91,167 $60,811 $149,639 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. Federal Obligations for Science and Engineering Federal Obligations for R&D in Science and Engineering Federally Financed R&D Expenditures 36

Table 21 - continued Federal Obligations and Federally Financed R&D by Texas Institutions, FY 2000 (Dollars in Thousands) Institution Federal Obligations for Science and Engineering Texas A&M HSC $1,158 $795 $14,321 Texas A&M International $303 $303 --- Texas A&M System Office $21,519 $19,914 --- Texas A&M-Commerce --- --- $157 Texas A&M-Corpus Christi $895 $334 $1,363 Texas A&M-Kingsville $424 $162 $2,179 Texas Christian $1,873 $1,871 $2,441 Texas Southern $3,758 $3,096 $1,844 Texas Tech $20,780 $19,738 $21,481 Texas Woman's $2,005 $1,694 $1,440 Trinity $564 $426 $746 Univ. North Tx HSC --- --- $5,799 Univ. of Dallas $35 $35 --- Univ. of Houston $19,200 $17,499 $21,365 Univ. of Houston System Administration $2,231 $1,143 --- Univ. of Houston-Clear Lake $8,156 $8,110 $6,383 Univ. of Houston-Downtown $272 $172 $660 Univ. of the Incarnate Word $480 $25 --- University of North Texas $8,806 $7,921 $3,618 UT at Arlington $4,625 $3,577 $5,106 UT at Austin $159,849 $134,977 $178,889 UT at Brownsville $2,303 $131 --- UT at Dallas $6,628 $6,048 $7,049 UT at El Paso $12,910 $7,722 $16,416 UT at San Antonio $13,845 $6,683 $7,441 UT at Tyler $102 --- --- UT M.D. Anderson Cancer $92,691 $90,566 $81,872 UT of the Permian Basin $100 --- --- UT Southwestern Medical Center $126,389 $119,767 $109,165 UT System Office $8,805 $8,777 --- UTHSC at Houston $88,990 $83,810 $79,665 UTHSC at San Antonio $77,731 $71,172 $65,251 UTMB at Galveston $66,512 $60,241 $61,357 UT-Pan American $2,911 $203 $1,135 West Texas A&M $214 $118 $140 Wiley Coll. $267 --- --- Texas Total $1,107,264 $958,185 $1,101,463 SOURCE: National Science Foundation, WebCASPAR Database System, 02/24/2003 Shading indicates the five highest in each category. Federal Obligations for R&D in Science and Engineering Federally Financed R&D Expenditures 37

Figure 11 shows federal obligations to Texas higher education institutions for research and development in science and engineering by federal agency. The National Institutes of Health have a long history of providing most of the federal research support to Texas higher education institutions. 600 Figure 11 Federal Obligations for R&D in Science and Engineering Texas Universities and Colleges, 1991-2000 Top Five Support Agencies 500 Dollars in Millions 400 300 National Institutes of Health 200 100 Department of Defense NASA National Science Foundation 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Year SOURCE: National Science Foundation WebCASPAR Database System, Constant 1996 Dollars, 02/24/2003 Department of Energy Table 22 shows federal obligations from federal agencies providing the most support to the most federal research-intensive Texas higher education institutions. The National Institutes of Health provide most of the federal support at health-related institutions. The Department of Defense, the National Science Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health provide most of the federal support for The University of Texas at Austin. The Department of Agriculture, the National Institutes of Health, and the National Science Foundation provide most of the support for Texas A&M University. The National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health provide most of the federal support for Rice University. The University of Houston receives most of its federal support from the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation. Texas Tech University receives most of its support from the Department of Defense and the National Institutes of Health. 38

Table 22 Texas Universities and Colleges with Federal Science and Engineering R&D Obligations of more than $10 Million By Support Agency, FY 2000 (Dollars in Thousands) Institution National Institutes of Health Dept. of Defense National Science Foundation NASA Dept. of Energy Dept. of Agriculture All Other Federal Agencies Total of All Federal Agencies Baylor-Coll. of Medicine $162,948 $2,177 $292 $2,055 $750 $1,083 $3,028 $172,333 UT at Austin $24,638 $56,480 $26,286 $9,706 $11,653 $11 $6,203 $134,977 UT Southwestern Med Center $116,842 $1,925 $384 $616 $0 $0 $0 $119,767 UT M.D. Anderson Cancer $84,592 $4,069 $319 $383 $0 $0 $1,203 $90,566 UTHSC at Houston $76,902 $484 $480 $796 $0 $0 $5,148 $83,810 UTHSC at San Antonio $57,368 $10,467 $749 $313 $0 $0 $2,275 $71,172 Texas A&M $11,877 $9,510 $11,707 $4,222 $3,157 $15,465 $4,873 $60,811 UTMB at Galveston $56,487 $395 $556 $796 $619 $0 $1,388 $60,241 Rice $5,034 $4,161 $11,314 $3,183 $2,323 $263 $96 $26,374 Texas A&M System Office $15,999 $1,623 $0 $0 $1,888 $20 $384 $19,914 Texas Tech $4,487 $6,683 $2,397 $1,134 $1,218 $1,914 $1,905 $19,738 Univ. of Houston $9,725 $557 $4,074 $1,746 $1,095 $121 $181 $17,499 SOURCE: National Science Foundation, WebCASPAR Database System, 02/24/2003 Figure 12 shows federally financed research and development expenditures at Texas public and private higher education institutions by scientific discipline. Most of the expenditures are made in medical and biological sciences. Figure 12 Federally Financed Research Expenditures by Discipline Texas Public and Private Institutions, FY 2000 All Other Life Sciences Biological Sciences Computer Sciences Engineering Environmental Sciences R&D Discipline Mathematical Sciences Medical Sciences Other Sciences Physical Sciences Psychology Social Sciences 0 100 200 300 SOURCE: National Science Foundation WebCASPAR Database System, 02/24/2003 Dollars in Millions 39

40

APPENDIX A RESEARCH EXPENDITURES SURVEYS THECB - Survey of Research Expenses, FY 2002 Public Universities and Health-Related Institutions About the On-Line Form The survey should be completed by using the on-line form by December 2, 2002 The on-line form will be used to submit your institution's FY 2002 research expense data. The login page for the form has an instructions page and links to previous expenditures reports. Blank Lotus and Excel worksheets can be downloaded here, but the information still must be entered into the on-line form. The on-line form consists of five parts, easily navigated with the buttons on the bottom of each web page. The whole form is saved when clicking on the "Total" buttons, going from page to page or clicking the "Save and Logoff" buttons. Using the "Reload Last Save" button will return information changed on a particular page before any other buttons are clicked on. Clicking underlined row or column labels will open a viewable definition for that item, and full instructions and definitions are accessible from the bottom of any page. Use whole dollar amounts, as the system will truncate decimals. The system will ignore any characters (dollar signs, commas, etc.) typed into entry blocks in parts 2-5. Click on any "Total" button to calculate column and row totals which are clearly marked in yellow. The FICE code for your institution will be used to log in to the system, and please safeguard the provided password and authorization code. The password may be issued to individuals for completion of the form. When the form is ready for final submission, the final approval authority (usually the highest research executive at the institution) clicks the "Submit to THECB" button in part 5 and enters name, title and the authorization code. Using the print button before final authorization will produce a draft printout of all forms. After final authorization, your data cannot be accessed or altered, but a printout of the final version can be produced. If you have questions or need assistance, contact information is located at the bottom of each web page or you may call Dale Cherry or Linda Domelsmith at 512-427-6150. A-1

A-2

A-3

Part 5 for Public Universities Part 5 for Public Health Institutions A-4