ARL PRESERVATION STATISTICS

ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES WASHINGTON, D.C. 2004 ARL PRESERVATION STATISTICS 2002-03 A COMPILATION OF STATISTICS FROM THE MEMBERS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES Compiled and Edited by MARK YOUNG MARTHA KYRILLIDOU

The ARL Preservation Statistics is published annually by Association of Research Libraries 21 Dupont Circle, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 202-296-2296; FAX 202-872-0884 e-mail: pubs@arl.org The quantitative tables presented in this publication are not indicative of performance and outcomes and should not be used as measures of library quality. In comparing any individual library to ARL medians or to other ARL members, one must be careful to make such comparisons within the context of differing institutional and local goals and characteristics. ISBN 1-59407-667-7 ISSN 1050-7442 Copyright 2004 by the Association of Research Libraries This compilation is copyrighted by the Association of Research Libraries. Blanket permission is granted to reproduce and distribute copies of this work for nonprofit educational or library purposes, provided that the author, source, and copyright notice are included on each copy. This permission is in addition to rights of reproduction granted under Section 107, 108, and other provisions of the U.S. Copyright Act. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Science and National Information Standards Organization standard Permanence of Paper for Publications and Documents in Libraries and Archives, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992(R1997). Printed in the United States of America

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 5 Summary of Preservation Data Table 1989-90 to 1995-96... 13 Summary of Preservation Data Table 1996-97 to 2002-03...14 Library Data Tables Table 1: Table 2: Personnel (FTE)...16 Summary Data...18 Expenditures (in U.S. dollars)...20 Summary Data...24 Table 3: Conservation Treatment, Binding and Preservation Reformatting...26 Summary Data...30 ARL Preservation Statistics Questionnaire and Instructions, 2002-03...33 Footnotes to ARL Preservation Statistics 2002-03...45 Appendix: ARL Member Libraries as of June 1, 2004...61 3

INTRODUCTION ARL Preservation Statistics 2002-03 presents data from 123 U.S. and Canadian research libraries that were members of the Association of Research Libraries during the 2002-03 fiscal year. 1 The ARL membership consisted of 113 university libraries and 10 independent research libraries (public or private) in 2002-03. Major Findings Among the significant developments that took place in research libraries in the 1980s was the emergence of preservation programs as distinct administrative units, separately staffed, funded, and administered. There were 66 such programs reported in 1988, as many as 80 reported in recent years, and 78 in 2002-03. 2 These rapidly shifting trends have made themselves evident in many categories. Preservation expenditures for ARL s 115 reporting member libraries were $97,833,909 in 2002-03, which reflects an inflation-adjusted increase of 17% since the survey s revision in 1996-97. 3 Total preservation staff dropped to 1,746 FTEs in 2002-03, after being over 1,800 FTEs in each of the last two years. Although all three levels of conservation treatment dropped from 2001-02 levels, Level 1 and Level 3 treatment had seen unusually large upward spikes last year, and their 2002-03 amounts are more in line with what they have been throughout the last decade. Microfilming activity decreased to 50,397 bound volumes; as shown in Graph 1, this is the smallest amount of microfilming recorded in the history of the survey. Graph 1: Bound Volumes Microfilmed 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000-1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 1 The Association of Research Libraries currently has 123 members, but only 115 libraries are included in this dataset. Alberta, Howard, Illinois Chicago, Manitoba, Missouri, Oregon, the Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, and the Center for Research Libraries did not submit responses to this survey. 2 Figures revised to accommodate the new definition of preservation administrator since 1994 95, a preservation administrator has been defined as one who spends at least 25% of his or her time managing a partial or comprehensive preservation program. 3 For more information on the survey revision, see page 8. Adjustments for inflation were computed using Consumer Price Index data retrieved from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers - (CPI-U), located at <http://146.142.4.24/cgibin/surveymost?cu> 5

External funding Availability of external funds plays a critical role in preservation activities. In 1988, the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) began a multi-year, expanded cooperative preservation microfilming program, in which ARL libraries have participated extensively. However, it appears that cuts in the NEH budget have also negatively affected availability of external funding for preservation, which fell constantly from a high of $11,090,547 in 1992-93 to a low of $4,917,732 in 1997-98. In recent years external expenditures have been up and down, with the 2002-03 figure of $7,326,613 representing a 7.4% increase from 2001-02. Analysis of Core Data for All Reporting Libraries 1. Organizational Structure a. Preservation Administration The most significant means for measuring the progress of ARL libraries in their preservation efforts is to track the existence of preservation programs managed by a preservation administrator. The data offer persuasive evidence that preservation programs have become a standard unit in research libraries, although there have not been any increases in the number of new programs established. As displayed in Table 1, 78 institutions indicated that the library has appointed a preservation administrator, and, of those, 60 libraries reported that their preservation programs are managed by a full-time preservation administrator. Table 1. Administration of Preservation Programs Full-time preservation administrator 60 (52.17%) Part-time preservation administrator who devotes 50% or more time to preservation activities, but not 100% 13 (11.30%) Part-time preservation administrator who devotes 25% to 50% of time to preservation activities 5 (4.35%) Preservation administrator with less than 25% of time to preservation activities or no preservation administrator 37 (32.17%) b. Reporting Relationships While most ARL libraries have separate preservation units, their placement is far from uniform. The 78 responses to the question on reporting relationships show that almost 40% of the preservation administrators report to the library director or associate library director (or an equivalent position, such as dean of libraries, etc.). 28.2% of administrators report to the assistant/associate director for collection management. The third most often cited reporting relationship is to a director in Technical Services. The remaining libraries chose a variety of organizational options, including placing the preservation administrator within special collections, public services, or administrative services. Although the placement of preservation departments within the library structure varies, with few exceptions, the preservation administrator reports to senior library management. 6

Table 2. Position to Which Preservation Administrator Reports Director of Libraries/Associate Director 31 (39.7%) Assistant/Associate Director for Collection Management 22 (28.2%) Assistant/Associate Director for Technical Services 14 (17.9%) Assistant/Associate Director for Public Services 4 (5.1%) Other 7 (9.0%) 2. Personnel The size of the staff reporting to the preservation administrator is a key factor in defining a library s level of preservation program development. Table 3, below, displays the relation between number of professional staff FTE and the number of support staff FTE and student assistant FTE in preservation units (a total of 78 programs reported). The preservation administrator is included in the number of professional staff. Reporting accurate statistics regarding the number of FTE staff engaged in preservation activities library-wide has always been problematic. The variety and complexity of organizational structures make collecting the data a time-consuming and difficult burden for libraries. Even in libraries with large-scale preservation departments, the data show that there are preservation aspects in the work of almost every library unit and that preservation is a library-wide responsibility. The more decentralized preservation activities are, the more scattered preservation staff becomes, and thus providing accurate data is all the more difficult. Given these caveats, Table 4 shows the medians of staff in preservation programs, librarywide (with 115 libraries reporting data). Table 3. Staffing Patterns of Preservation Programs Number of Professionals Median of Support Staff Median of Student Assistants Median of Total FTE 4 or more (15.38%) 14.97 1.35 22.57 2-3.9 (34.62%) 4.00 1.61 9.10 1-1.9 (35.90%) 4.13 2.00 7.31 less than 1 (14.10%) 2.68 1.34 5.00 Table 4. Staffing Patterns of Preservation Activities Library-wide Number of Professionals Median of Support Staff Median of Student Assistants Median of Total FTE 4 or more (10.43%) 12.06 3.80 23.67 2-3.9 (24.35%) 5.70 2.74 10.82 1-1.9 (24.35%) 5.30 2.60 9.26 less than 1 (40.87%) 3.84 0.90 6.00 7

Graph 2: Preservation Expenditures 2002-03 Contract Binding 25.94% Contract Preservation - Photocopies 0.79% Contract Preservation - Microfilm 4.88% Other Contract Preservation 4.91% Contract Conservation 1.85% Supplies 4.75% Equipment 1.75% Total Salaries and Wages 55.14% 3. Expenditures The financial support for preservation activities in ARL university libraries ranged from approximately $4,000 to just under $7 million during fiscal year 2002-03. As a corollary, ARL university libraries spent between a fraction of one percent and roughly 7% of their total budgets on preservation. Table 5 summarizes preservation expenditures by displaying the midpoint for three ranges for all reporting ARL libraries, including the Library of Congress, which alone spent more than $17 million on its preservation programs. Table 5 also indicates corresponding median preservation expenditures as a percentage of total operating expenditures and as a percentage of materials expenditures. Graph 2, above, highlights the allocation of preservation expenditures, based on data from all reporting ARL libraries. Local needs and capabilities will determine the exact allocation of budgetary resources to various activities, but it is useful to look at the aggregate apportionment for ARL member libraries. The typical trends still hold true, with salaries and wages being the biggest expense. Table 5. Preservation Expenditures Third Quartile Median of All Responses First Quartile Total Preservation Expenditures $831,481 $479,252 $285,109 Preservation Expenditures as % of Total Library Exp. Preservation Expenditures as % of Materials Expenditures 3.43% 2.65% 1.86% 9.07% 6.43% 4.24% 8

4. Conservation Treatment Conservation treatments encompass an array of activities as defined in the instructions that accompanied the survey. Beginning in 1989-90, the amount of time required to complete conservation treatments has been used (i.e., treatments that require 15 minutes or less to perform, more than 15 minutes but less than 2 hours, and more than 2 hours ). While the resulting data tell only how long the treatments take rather than how technically complex they are, results are more reliable and do not invite facile assumptions about the nature of an institution s conservation program. The table below provides information on the number of volumes that received minor (Level 1) treatment and the number of volumes that were given more time-consuming intermediate (Level 2) and major (Level 3) conservation treatment. It is recognized that significant differences exist in the nature of treatments performed. Table 6. Conservation Treatment Third Quartile Median of All Responses First Quartile Number of Volumes: Level 1 Treatment 7,589 3,374 1,001 Number of Volumes: Levels 2 & 3 Treatment 2,278 1,212 397 5. Preservation Reformatting This section was revised substantially in 1997-98 4 and, as a result, a number of libraries were not able to provide complete data in recent years. Preservation reformatting questions distinguish between reformatting of (a) bound volumes/pamphlets, (b) single, unbound sheets, and (c) photographs and nonpaper items (e.g., audiotapes, motion picture film). Preservation reformatting for (a) bound volumes and (b) single sheets tracks three processes: photocopying, microfilming, and digitizing. 4 The survey was revised to address identified problems with the earlier versions of the questionnaire and to ask for new data elements (In some cases, in the form of optional questions). All critical data elements have been retained so libraries can continue to track comparable information over the past decade. In particular, the questionnaire was revised in the following manner: In the conservation treatment, commercial binding, and preservation reformatting categories, breakdowns identifying in-house vs. contract treatments have been eliminated and a composite figure is requested. This change eliminates half of the data categories while retaining all significant data. Outsourcing continues to be captured in the expenditures section of the survey, as in earlier versions. Confusion regarding photographs and non-paper items (e.g., audio tapes, motion picture film) has been eliminated by separating "conservation" (repair of the original question #19) from reformatting (copying of the original question #24). For the purposes of streamlining, questions involving the number of titles and number of frames microfilmed have been eliminated, and a single measure of accomplishment "number of volumes filmed" has been retained. Data categories for microfilm and microfiche have been collapsed. The microfilming of unbound sheets (manuscripts, archives) has been broken out from bound-volume filming to yield clear, meaningful statistics. The same holds true for photocopying. Two optional questions regarding digitizing have been added ("number of bound volumes/pamphlets digitized" and "number of single, unbound sheets [manuscripts, maps, photographs] digitized"). In the instructions for the survey, "digitizing for preservation purposes" has been broadly defined. 9

ARL Preservation Statistics actually underreports total production of microfilming among ARL members because the reporting of preservation microfilming production remains problematic. Although the best indicator of preservation microfilming output is the total number of exposures or number of frames filmed, many libraries failed to report this figure in the past. So, the survey was recently revised to track only volumes, rather than titles and exposures. The total number of volumes reported over the last 10 years is charted in Graph 1. A total of 50,397 volumes microfilmed were reported this year. A separate question tracks single, unbound sheets microfilmed, which totaled 9,391,834 in 2002-03. Digitizing bound volumes is gradually emerging as a viable preservation option. In 2002-03, as in 2001-02, 51 ARL libraries reported more than zero bound volumes digitized. The amount of items digitized varies widely, from one volume in a few institutions to 3,762 volumes digitized by the University of Michigan. Analysis of Core Data by Size of Collection This section analyzes the organizational, fiscal, and functional components of preservation programs in relation to collection size. Many factors including the age, nature and scope of the collection, the environmental conditions under which the collections have been housed, and the level of use shape the ways in which a library s preservation program develops. However, size of collection is the most important factor in measuring the level of preservation effort. In 1991, ARL published preservation program benchmarks for selected core activities in the Preservation Program Models report. 5 The benchmarks were intended to serve as indicators of the level of effort that can be expected as a library s preservation program develops. The benchmarks reflect targets and are a useful tool for measuring progress toward meeting preservation needs. The tables in this section parallel the four size groupings of ARL libraries used in the Preservation Program Models report. 6 These are collections of more than 5 million volumes, 3 to 5 million volumes, 2 to 3 million volumes, and less than 2 million volumes. For each size grouping, the tables provide medians for personnel, budget, and production. In this report, median figures are used as indicators of the midpoint in the distribution at which values cluster. The medians offer a composite measure for assessing the scale of local effort based on four different size groupings. The benchmarks reflected an ideal progression of preservation program development, and provide a useful tool for comparing the level of preservation services needed with the current level of activities. Libraries interested in that comparison may wish to consult the Preservation Program Models report. The size groupings and number of libraries in each category are: Group 1:* Group 2:+ Group 3:# Group 4:^ Over 5 million volumes (26 libraries) 3 to 5 million volumes (36 libraries) 2 to 3 million volumes (46 libraries) Under 2 million volumes (7 libraries) The tables below summarize the responses in five categories for each of the four size groupings. Please note the following when reading the tables: * 6 libraries in this group reported no Preservation Unit + 10 libraries in this group reported no Preservation Unit # 17 libraries in this group reported no Preservation Unit ^ 4 libraries in this group reported no Preservation Unit 5 Jan Merrill-Oldham, Carolyn Clark Morrow, and Mark Roosa, Preservation Program Models: A Study Project and Report (Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 1991). 6 The libraries in each group are determined by data submitted to ARL Statistics 2002-03 (Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 2004). 10

Table 7. Staffing Patterns of Preservation Programs Median of Professionals Median of Support Staff Median of Students Median of Total FTE Group 1 2.25 5.63 0.87 10.06 Group 2 1.00 3.50 1.68 8.15 Group 3 1.00 2.30 0.25 5.33 Group 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Table 8. Staffing Patterns of Preservation Activities Library-wide Median of Professionals Median of Support Staff Median of Students Median of Total FTE Group 1 4.65 15.00 4.18 25.48 Group 2 1.50 5.92 3.17 12.30 Group 3 1.31 4.50 1.69 7.79 Group 4 0.75 3.45 0.11 4.50 Table 9. Preservation Expenditures Median of Total Preservation Expenditures Median of Pres. Exp. as % of Total Library Exp. Median of Pres. Exp. as % of Materials Exp. Group 1 $1,111,937 3.15% 10.19% Group 2 533,437 2.61 6.66 Group 3 358,900 2.39 5.69 Group 4 230,932 1.68 3.66 Table 10. Conservation Treatment Median of Level 1 Treatment Median of Level 2 Treatment Median of Level 3 Treatment Group 1 7,684 1,852 258 Group 2 3,898 1,239 55 Group 3 1,456 486 16 Group 4 800 346 0 Table 11. Contract Binding Median of Contract Binding Expenditures Median of Number of Volumes Bound Group 1 $298,709 36,734 Group 2 168,628 19,951 Group 3 123,541 13,114 Group 4 68,629 8,574 11

Conclusion ARL Preservation Statistics provides a broad range of quantitative data and should not be used as a measure of quality of preservation programs. Preservation efforts encompass a diverse array of activities, and there are substantial differences in the nature of preservation work. ARL Preservation Statistics cannot completely capture the richness, sheer variety, and full extent of each library s preservation commitment. Much progress has been achieved, however, in increasing the consistency and hence comparability of the reported quantitative data. Most of the data contained in this publication are descriptive indices of preservation activities in research libraries, including preservation staffs, expenditures, and productivity. The data are also useful in determining the organization of preservation units and the components of preservation programs. Each library s total expenditures and materials expenditures, as reported in ARL Statistics 2002-03, are displayed in the tables together with the percentage of preservation expenditures. To aid comparability in ARL Preservation Statistics, expenditures of Canadian libraries are expressed in U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.51023 Canadian dollars to one U.S. dollar. This exchange rate is the average monthly noon exchange rate published in the Bank of Canada Review for the period from July 2002 to June 2003. Expenditures reported in Canadian dollars are given in the Footnotes to the ARL Preservation Statistics. Those using ARL Preservation Statistics to compare activities in individual institutions will need to consult the definitions used in the instructions as well as the Footnotes section. Although the definitions and procedures used in the Preservation Statistics questionnaire aim to achieve consistency, variant reporting practices do exist among ARL libraries. Care should be taken in comparing this year s data to data collected in previous years, taking into account the revisions in the questionnaire described earlier in this introduction. Again, all the data in this publication are quantitative and descriptive and are not indicative of qualitative factors. When comparing any individual library preservation program to ARL medians or to other ARL members, one must be careful to make such comparisons within the context of differing institutional and local goals and preservations needs. Association of Research Libraries September 1, 2004 12

DATA TABLE SUMMARY OF PRESERVATION 1988-89 to 1995-96 + Year 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 Number of Institutions Reporting: 107 115 117 119 114 115 115 116 Number of Preservation Administrators: 66 77 77 76 77 80 81 80 Total Staff Engaged in Preservation Activities Library-Wide: 1,620.52 1,760.73 1,744.34 1,867 1,841.99 1,900.20 1,912.08 1,879.54 Total Preservation Expenditures: $60,714,802 $66,045,392 $70,705,449 $76,550,655 $76,793,364 $77,674,363 $79,164,226 $77,069,334 Conservation Treatment (volumes) Level 1: Level 2: Level 3: Total: 661,047* 687,897 672,567 1,038,934 669,616 683,305 666,623 610,927 185,294* 277,370 273,825 265,891 265,848 246,475 233,946 230,870 21,736* 35,323 18,629 24,459 24,241 23,729 25,814 22,453 905,669* 1,003,126 965,075 1,334,786 964,375 991,254 957,091 919,714 Microfiliming Treatment Titles: 75,198 68,904 77,740 93,052 104,818 106,733 133,290 89,560 Volumes: 60,502 92,093 123,233 204,934 124,455 127,650 173,646 154,805 Exposures: 18,254,133 23,687,873 28,264,637 28,892,445 32,844,044 29,900,149 28,474,292 25,772,672 Source: ARL Preservation Statistics 2002-03 (Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2004) + The ARL Preservation Statistics survey was revised in 1996-97, eliminating certain categories, adding others and changing the ways in which some items conserved are counted. These data reflect the pre-revision categories and counting methods. See the Introduction for details. * In the 1988-89 survey, conservation treatment was divided into Minor, Interim, and Major categories. 13

DATA TABLE SUMMARY OF PRESERVATION 1996-97 to 2002-03 + Year 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 Number of Institutions Reporting: 115 118 114 110 113 116 115 Number of Preservation Administrators: 83 82 81 77 82 81 78 Total Staff Engaged in Preservation Activities Library-Wide: 1,742.57 1,825.53 1,765.70 1,753.29 1,800.04 1,835.31 1746.62 Total Preservation Expenditures: $80,772,236 $83,340,852 $82,642,548 $85,842,245 $92,276,777 $96,575,155 $97,833,909 Conservation Treatment Level 1: 697,922 693,113 686,319 660,597 624,728 873,842 658,664 Level 2: 213,064 241,538 207,114 254,296 222,995 183,437 174,868 Level 3: 22,520 28,748 33,119 62,179 19,018 286,622 32,806 Total: 933,506 963,405 919,038 976,658 867,593 1,343,598 868,293 Microfilming Treatment Volumes: 109,526 94,044 191,348 87,531 62,039 88,170 50,397 Single Sheets: 6,727,348 7,700,261 7,540,695 6,214,507 9,204,948 11,970,653 9,391,834 Source: ARL Preservation Statistics 2002-03 (Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2004) + The ARL Preservation Statistics survey was revised in 1996-97, eliminating certain categories, adding others and changing the ways in which some items conserved are counted. These data reflect the post-revision categories and counting methods. See the Introduction for details. 14

LIBRARY DATA TABLES

ARL PRESERVATION STATISTICS 2002-03 TABLE 1 PERSONNEL (FTE) Pres. Admin. % time on Pres. Activ. Pres. Unit Prof. Staff Pres. Unit Support Staff Pres. Unit Student Assist. Pres. Unit Total Staff Library- Wide Prof. Staff Library- Wide Support Staff Library- Wide Student Assist. Library- Wide Total Staff (Survey Question #) (1) (2) (4a) (4b) (4c) (4d) (5a) (5b) (5c) (5d) INSTITUTION Notes ALABAMA LM+ No 0 0 0 0 0 1.32 4.77 1.83 7.92 ARIZONA + No 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.95 0.40 2.35 ARIZONA STATE LB+ Yes 100 2.00 2.00 0.59 4.59 2.26 5.92 2.07 10.25 AUBURN + Yes 100 1.00 3.50 2.00 6.50 1.33 3.67 2.00 7.00 BOSTON LM+ Yes 100 2.00 4.00 13.00 19.00 3.25 7.25 15.00 25.50 BOSTON COLLEGE + Yes 100 2.00 6.00 2.50 10.50 2.00 6.00 2.50 10.50 BRIGHAM YOUNG + No 0 U/A U/A U/A U/A 5.00 0 7.50 12.50 BRITISH COLUMBIA LM+ No 0 0.37 1.00 0 1.37 0.69 7.69 0.17 8.55 BROWN + Yes 75 4.00 5.00 0.40 9.40 5.86 8.95 1.65 16.46 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY L+ Yes 100 2.00 10.70 2.49 15.19 5.54 20.81 8.05 34.40 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS M+ Yes 50 0.50 4.00 2.50 7.00 0.66 5.50 3.00 9.16 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE + Yes 100 0 6.50 3.60 10.10 0 6.50 3.60 10.10 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES LM+ Yes 25 0 0 0 0 1.32 6.39 5.70 13.41 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE + Yes 50 0.50 3.00 3.40 6.90 0.50 3.00 4.00 7.50 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO M+ Yes 60 0.60 4.59 2.35 7.54 2.90 9.75 5.43 18.08 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA + No 0 0 0 0 0 0.50 5.00 4.00 9.50 CASE WESTERN RESERVE LM+ Yes 100 1.00 2.40 0.60 4.00 1.03 3.82 0.64 5.49 CHICAGO LM+ Yes 100 2.00 3.36 1.61 6.97 3.82 15.84 5.11 24.77 CINCINNATI LM+ Yes 70 1.25 3.00 3.10 7.35 1.25 3.00 3.10 7.35 COLORADO + Yes 100 1.00 7.00 1.60 9.60 1.25 8.50 2.60 12.35 COLORADO STATE + Yes 100 1.00 5.40 1.60 8.00 1.30 5.80 1.80 8.90 COLUMBIA + Yes 100 6.00 18.00 2.10 26.10 6.67 21.42 3.13 31.22 CONNECTICUT LMB+ Yes 100 1.00 2.00 2.43 5.43 1.07 3.75 3.33 8.15 CORNELL LMB+ Yes 100 7.00 15.50 0.50 23.00 8.60 18.90 3.40 30.90 DARTMOUTH M+ Yes 100 2.00 3.75 1.15 6.90 2.00 4.50 1.15 7.65 DELAWARE + Yes 100 1.00 4.00 2.26 7.26 1.25 4.75 3.26 9.26 DUKE LM+ Yes 100 3.00 6.25 1.00 10.25 3.61 7.75 1.06 12.42 EMORY LMB+ Yes 100 2.00 2.50 0.66 5.16 2.34 5.53 2.76 10.63 FLORIDA + Yes 100 3.00 7.00 3.00 13.00 3.00 8.90 3.50 15.40 FLORIDA STATE LMB+ No 0 0 0 0 0 0.34 4.02 1.50 5.86 GEORGE WASHINGTON LM+ No 10 0.10 1.00 0.25 1.35 0.56 4.11 1.55 6.22 GEORGETOWN LM+ Yes 100 2.00 5.50 0.25 7.75 2.00 5.75 0.25 8.00 GEORGIA L+ Yes 50 0.50 1.00 0.33 1.83 6.00 16.06 13.83 35.89 GEORGIA TECH + No 0 0 0 0 0 2.00 3.00 4.50 9.50 GUELPH + No 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 3.00 0.08 3.09 HARVARD LM+ Yes 100 32.20 39.60 5.54 77.34 45.91 66.34 15.74 127.99 HAWAII + Yes 100 1.00 3.50 5.00 9.50 1.00 4.00 7.25 12.25 HOUSTON + No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.10 0.10 ILLINOIS, URBANA L+ Yes 100 2.50 3.50 2.14 8.14 4.30 11.45 10.43 26.18 INDIANA + Yes 100 3.00 5.00 3.00 11.00 5.00 9.00 7.00 21.00 IOWA LM+ Yes 100 2.00 7.00 4.00 13.00 2.13 8.00 5.05 15.18 IOWA STATE + Yes 100 1.30 6.42 3.57 11.29 1.37 6.43 3.63 11.43 JOHNS HOPKINS M+ Yes 100 2.02 5.20 1.07 8.29 2.18 5.65 1.57 9.40 KANSAS LMB+ Yes 100 3.00 3.00 9.25 15.25 3.50 5.50 10.75 19.75 KENT STATE + No 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.00 1.00 4.00 KENTUCKY LM+ Yes 100 3.00 8.00 4.75 15.75 3.60 14.00 10.25 27.85 + - See Footnotes L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses M - Includes Medical library U/A - Unavailable 16

ARL PRESERVATION STATISTICS 2002-03 TABLE 1 PERSONNEL (FTE) Pres. Admin. % time on Pres. Activ. Pres. Unit Prof. Staff Pres. Unit Support Staff Pres. Unit Student Assist. Pres. Unit Total Staff Library- Wide Prof. Staff Library- Wide Support Staff Library- Wide Student Assist. Library- Wide Total Staff (Survey Question #) (1) (2) (4a) (4b) (4c) (4d) (5a) (5b) (5c) (5d) INSTITUTION Notes LAVAL LM+ Yes 25 1.58 5.00 0 6.58 1.78 5.30 0 7.08 LOUISIANA STATE L+ No 0 0 0 0 0 1.10 7.35 4.00 12.45 LOUISVILLE B+ No 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 1.75 3.50 6.00 MCGILL LM+ No 0 U/A U/A U/A U/A 0.75 5.25 U/A 6.00 MCMASTER + Yes 100 2.00 0 0.30 2.30 2.00 2.20 0.30 4.50 MARYLAND + Yes 100 4.50 5.00 1.88 11.38 7.60 9.75 5.98 23.33 MASSACHUSETTS + No 0 0 0 0 0 0.16 2.28 0.80 3.24 MIT + Yes 100 2.00 2.60 1.50 6.10 4.60 4.00 3.80 12.40 MIAMI LM+ No 0 0 0 0 0 1.13 12.06 5.27 18.46 MICHIGAN LM+ Yes 100 6.00 14.43 1.70 22.13 7.94 20.09 5.48 33.51 MICHIGAN STATE + Yes 50 0.50 4.00 3.50 8.00 1.50 7.00 4.46 12.96 MINNESOTA LM+ No 5 0.05 1.00 0.80 1.85 0.25 10.73 4.40 15.38 MONTREAL LM+ No 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.70 0 7.70 NEBRASKA + Yes 50 1.00 6.00 3.00 10.00 1.60 8.50 5.40 15.50 NEW MEXICO LM+ No 0 0 0 0 0 3.00 2.00 6.00 11.00 NEW YORK LM+ Yes 100 3.00 6.00 1.68 10.68 4.09 7.00 1.68 12.77 NORTH CAROLINA LM+ Yes 100 2.00 6.93 0.93 9.86 7.48 15.72 6.54 29.74 NORTH CAROLINA STATE + Yes 100 2.50 6.00 2.22 10.72 2.88 7.53 4.08 14.49 NORTHWESTERN LM+ Yes 100 3.80 7.50 2.37 13.67 4.07 12.06 5.42 21.55 NOTRE DAME LB+ Yes 100 1.00 6.00 2.20 9.20 1.05 7.91 2.38 11.34 OHIO MB+ Yes 90 1.90 2.00 1.60 5.50 4.50 5.33 2.67 12.50 OHIO STATE LM+ Yes 25 1.60 6.60 4.50 12.70 2.90 15.00 9.70 27.60 OKLAHOMA LMB+ No 15 0.57 0.50 0.87 1.94 0.60 2.25 2.45 5.30 OKLAHOMA STATE + No 10 0.10 0.20 0 0.30 0.47 3.65 1.50 5.62 PENNSYLVANIA LM+ No U/A 0 0 0 0 1.75 6.50 5.75 14.00 PENNSYLVANIA STATE B+ Yes 100 1.00 9.25 2.79 13.04 1.00 9.45 5.89 16.34 PITTSBURGH B+ Yes 100 U/A U/A U/A 5.00 U/A U/A U/A 8.00 PRINCETON + Yes 100 4.00 4.00 0 8.00 5.50 11.70 1.95 19.15 PURDUE + No 0 0 0 0 0 0.35 5.75 0.67 6.77 QUEEN'S LM+ No 10 0.10 1.20 0 1.30 0.20 6.20 0 6.40 RICE + Yes 100 1.00 4.25 0.29 5.54 1.30 4.35 0.44 6.09 ROCHESTER MB+ Yes 50 3.00 3.50 2.60 9.10 3.60 4.80 4.20 12.60 RUTGERS LB+ No 0 0 0 0 0 2.85 3.70 1.45 8.00 SASKATCHEWAN LM+ No 0 0 0 0 0 0.35 4.10 0 4.45 SOUTH CAROLINA L+ Yes 100 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 6.00 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LMB+ No 0 0 0 0 0 1.04 3.72 2.51 7.27 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS LM+ No 0 0 0 0 0 0.15 4.50 4.96 9.61 SUNY-ALBANY + Yes 100 2.00 1.00 0.69 3.69 2.25 4.25 0.69 7.19 SUNY-BUFFALO LM+ Yes 25 3.00 1.50 1.50 6.00 6.50 4.00 2.75 13.25 SUNY-STONY BROOK + Yes 75 0.75 1.00 0.20 1.95 0.85 1.33 0.50 2.68 SYRACUSE L+ Yes 100 2.00 3.50 0.20 5.70 3.81 3.58 0.27 7.66 TEMPLE LMB+ No 0 0 0 0 0 2.05 4.41 2.71 9.17 TENNESSEE LMB+ Yes 100 1.10 5.00 2.25 8.35 1.35 6.30 2.70 10.35 TEXAS L+ Yes 100 7.50 10.00 0.78 18.28 10.65 16.75 3.95 31.35 TEXAS A&M MB+ No 0 0 0.50 0.75 1.25 0.12 7.50 5.25 12.87 TEXAS TECH + Yes 100 1.00 2.00 0.25 3.25 1.25 3.00 1.00 5.25 + - See Footnotes L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses M - Includes Medical library U/A - Unavailable 17

ARL PRESERVATION STATISTICS 2002-03 TABLE 1 PERSONNEL (FTE) Pres. Admin. % time on Pres. Activ. Pres. Unit Prof. Staff Pres. Unit Support Staff Pres. Unit Student Assist. Pres. Unit Total Staff Library- Wide Prof. Staff Library- Wide Support Staff Library- Wide Student Assist. Library- Wide Total Staff (Survey Question #) (1) (2) (4a) (4b) (4c) (4d) (5a) (5b) (5c) (5d) INSTITUTION Notes TORONTO MB+ No 0 3.00 15.00 0 18.00 4.00 15.00 0 19.00 TULANE LM+ Yes 100 1.00 4.00 0.50 5.50 1.00 4.50 0.50 6.00 UTAH + Yes 100 1.00 6.00 3.50 10.50 1.00 6.00 3.50 10.50 VANDERBILT LM+ Yes 100 1.00 5.30 0.10 6.40 2.10 9.67 0.65 12.42 VIRGINIA + Yes 75 0 2.35 0.15 2.50 0.05 2.50 0.15 2.70 VIRGINIA TECH + Yes 25 1.40 2.20 2.00 5.60 1.40 4.60 4.00 10.00 WASHINGTON LM+ Yes 100 1.75 0 0.37 2.12 2.49 10.30 4.45 17.24 WASHINGTON STATE B+ No 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.01 0.54 2.55 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS LM+ Yes 100 1.05 5.30 2.00 8.35 1.05 5.55 2.00 8.60 WATERLOO + No 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.45 0.11 3.56 WAYNE STATE LMB+ No 0 0 0 0 0 1.42 2.62 2.12 6.16 WESTERN ONTARIO L+ No 0 0 0 0 0 0.50 0.15 0.90 1.55 WISCONSIN LM+ Yes 100 1.25 3.57 3.11 7.93 3.24 15.47 11.74 30.45 YALE M+ Yes 100 5.00 17.00 1.00 23.00 6.00 22.00 2.00 30.00 YORK LB+ No 0 0 0 0 0 0.08 2.05 0.17 2.30 BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY + No 0 0 0 0 0 3.00 4.00 1.50 8.50 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS L+ Yes 100 89.40 43.00 0.50 132.90 119.40 43.00 0.50 162.90 NATL. AGRICULTURAL LIB. + Yes 100 1.00 1.00 0 2.00 2.64 2.03 0.80 5.47 NATL. LIBRARY OF CANADA + Yes 100 0 0 0 0 11.55 11.59 0.53 23.67 NATL. LIBRARY OF MEDICINE M+ Yes 80 5.80 6.55 2.97 15.32 8.55 8.80 4.47 21.82 NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY + Yes 100 4.00 38.00 2.50 44.50 11.30 46.20 2.60 60.10 NEW YORK STATE LIBRARY LM+ Yes 100 1.00 7.00 0.40 8.40 1.00 8.00 0.40 9.40 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION B+ Yes 100 1.50 4.00 0 5.50 1.50 4.00 0 5.50 SUMMARY DATA Pres. Unit Prof. Staff Pres. Unit Support Staff Pres. Unit Student Assist. Pres. Unit Total Staff Library-Wide Prof. Staff Library-Wide Support Staff Library-Wide Student Assist. Library-Wide Total Staff (Survey Question #) (4a) (4b) (4c) (4d) (5a) (5b) (5c) (5d) University Medians 1.00 3.00 0.77 6.00 1.46 5.60 2.71 10.25 University Totals 177.84 407.35 148.67 738.86 286.67 790.09 364.50 1,449.26 Nonuniversity Medians 1.25 5.28 0.20 6.95 5.78 8.40 0.67 15.61 Nonuniversity Totals 102.70 99.55 6.37 208.62 158.94 127.62 10.80 297.36 GRAND TOTAL 280.54 506.90 155.04 947.48 445.61 917.71 375.30 1,746.62 NUMBER OF LIBRARIES 112 112 112 113 114 114 113 115 + - See Footnotes L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses M - Includes Medical library U/A - Unavailable 18

ARL PRESERVATION STATISTICS 2002-03 TABLE 2 EXPENDITURES Total Salaries & Wages Contract Conservation Contract Binding Contract Preservation: Photocopy Contract Preservation: Microfilm Other Contract Expend. Total Contract Expend. Supplies (Survey Question #) (6d) (7a) (7b) (7c) (7d) (7e) (7f) (8) INSTITUTION Notes ALABAMA LM+ 148,773 0 108,513 0 0 0 108,513 10,896 ARIZONA + 86,426 1,571 116,500 0 0 0 118,071 15,192 ARIZONA STATE LB+ 320,252 17,904 167,176 1,215 0 0 186,295 67,098 AUBURN + 134,415 0 80,686 0 0 0 80,686 17,243 BOSTON LM+ 389,330 0 146,335 0 0 0 146,335 33,054 BOSTON COLLEGE + 307,664 0 105,566 5,547 0 0 111,113 9,046 BRIGHAM YOUNG + 367,200 0 193,487 0 0 0 193,487 18,000 BRITISH COLUMBIA LM+ 207,230 0 125,722 0 9,635 0 135,357 3,889 BROWN + 698,188 51,809 277,161 8,794 0 0 337,764 40,256 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY L+ 1,443,169 28,541 1,174,906 15,619 77,706 24,987 1,321,759 42,817 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS M+ 251,950 0 148,513 2,913 7,394 9,000 167,820 20,811 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE + 263,242 0 144,640 0 7,394 0 152,034 12,866 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES LM+ 408,914 44,283 507,736 0 13,366 0 565,385 66,752 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE + 174,043 0 233,657 0 0 0 233,657 23,977 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO M+ 547,025 0 328,190 675 3,593 26,149 358,607 38,918 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA + 223,505 1,037 197,282 0 195 0 198,514 20,000 CASE WESTERN RESERVE LM+ 161,581 0 100,417 97 0 14,736 115,250 5,487 CHICAGO LM+ 780,760 26,425 376,056 13,205 20,164 1,000 436,850 38,717 CINCINNATI LM+ 164,843 0 137,071 0 0 0 137,071 9,673 COLORADO + 320,047 23,201 106,671 9,890 0 0 139,762 38,641 COLORADO STATE + 293,138 0 180,981 0 0 1,209 182,190 8,717 COLUMBIA + 956,263 192,721 754,849 64,718 183,754 246,880 1,442,922 88,821 CONNECTICUT LMB+ 294,207 557 292,275 0 0 0 292,832 21,239 CORNELL LMB+ 1,292,218 299 189,406 28,998 48,314 99,744 366,761 67,315 DARTMOUTH M+ 260,952 0 163,978 5,966 0 0 169,944 12,240 DELAWARE + 233,330 15,634 103,139 23,435 1,801 0 144,009 15,017 DUKE LM+ 392,685 4,928 282,170 3,216 0 0 290,314 71,489 EMORY LMB+ 337,274 0 184,283 0 92,310 0 276,593 7,314 FLORIDA + 356,887 5,897 199,175 0 91,827 74,962 371,861 8,781 FLORIDA STATE LMB+ 98,362 11,235 138,846 0 0 0 150,081 2,295 GEORGE WASHINGTON LM+ 140,501 0 129,544 0 0 0 129,544 3,202 GEORGETOWN LM+ 302,432 28,875 209,041 19,517 0 6,928 264,361 2,280 GEORGIA L+ 727,086 51,940 280,985 2,222 0 349,000 684,147 33,101 GEORGIA TECH + 195,000 0 80,595 0 0 0 80,595 1,000 GUELPH + 63,133 1,169 37,978 0 0 0 39,146 464 HARVARD LM+ 4,502,109 310,429 927,558 66,485 289,365 304,395 1,898,232 335,780 HAWAII + 292,618 255 242,686 518 17,283 0 260,742 7,761 HOUSTON + 1,185 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,824 ILLINOIS, URBANA L+ 660,040 7,824 227,636 5,531 13,180 73,674 327,845 65,145 INDIANA + 370,486 0 296,144 0 29,428 0 325,572 130,252 IOWA LM+ 454,678 0 207,643 0 13,187 45,828 266,658 32,254 IOWA STATE + 365,053 13,035 193,481 11,765 24,227 7,184 249,692 31,531 JOHNS HOPKINS M+ 306,051 1,627 140,410 0 0 2,798 144,835 23,009 + - See Footnotes L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses M - Includes Medical library U/A - Unavailable 20

ARL PRESERVATION STATISTICS 2002-03 TABLE 2 EXPENDITURES Equipment Total Preserv. Expend. Preserv. Expend. from External Sources Library Expend. (from ARL Statistics) Preserv. as % of Total Library Expend. Materials Expend. (from ARL Statistics) Preserv. as % of Total Materials Expend. (9) (10) (11) -a- -b- -c- -d- (Survey Question #) INSTITUTION 150 268,332 1,277 12,802,606 2.10 6,021,215 4.46 ALABAMA 10,429 230,118 5,450 25,656,448 0.90 11,399,093 2.02 ARIZONA 0 573,645 0 22,400,253 2.56 9,335,316 6.14 ARIZONA STATE 1,100 233,444 0 11,118,139 2.10 4,898,314 4.77 AUBURN 0 568,719 0 17,351,457 3.28 6,672,175 8.52 BOSTON 312 428,135 0 16,409,345 2.61 7,261,122 5.90 BOSTON COLLEGE 3,500 582,187 0 19,942,457 2.92 7,249,187 8.03 BRIGHAM YOUNG 33 346,509 348 23,108,150 1.50 9,720,484 3.56 BRITISH COLUMBIA 0 1,076,208 20,515 17,539,758 6.14 7,308,172 14.73 BROWN 6,312 2,814,057 28,844 52,575,033 5.35 16,291,361 17.27 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 4,065 444,646 0 17,828,690 2.49 6,106,571 7.28 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 1,564 429,706 0 20,085,270 2.14 7,113,737 6.04 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 0 1,041,051 340,000 40,044,840 2.60 12,672,517 8.22 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 0 431,677 0 11,427,547 3.78 4,642,773 9.30 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 4,263 948,813 0 25,699,825 3.69 8,165,077 11.62 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2,000 444,019 U/A 18,109,365 2.45 6,712,783 6.61 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 0 282,318 0 12,755,480 2.21 5,790,209 4.88 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 0 1,256,327 93,598 25,862,601 4.86 12,605,544 9.97 CHICAGO 0 311,587 0 19,425,518 1.60 8,280,686 3.76 CINCINNATI 4,475 502,925 0 18,993,174 2.65 8,532,696 5.89 COLORADO 14,558 498,603 1,454 15,933,029 3.13 8,550,597 5.83 COLORADO STATE 2,150 2,490,156 803,388 41,507,277 6.00 15,054,531 16.54 COLUMBIA 0 608,278 0 19,427,898 3.13 7,424,733 8.19 CONNECTICUT 0 1,726,294 372,870 39,759,708 4.34 13,582,562 12.71 CORNELL 0 443,136 0 16,047,493 2.76 6,883,720 6.44 DARTMOUTH 1,318 393,674 4,953 14,247,297 2.76 6,767,713 5.82 DELAWARE 51,023 805,511 0 32,315,593 2.49 12,545,843 6.42 DUKE 0 621,181 95,640 27,040,029 2.30 11,338,450 5.48 EMORY 5,798 743,327 50,732 26,119,518 2.85 10,213,822 7.28 FLORIDA 11,864 262,602 11,817 14,017,488 1.87 6,903,905 3.80 FLORIDA STATE 0 273,247 0 21,783,192 1.25 8,989,520 3.04 GEORGE WASHINGTON 0 569,073 0 20,291,615 2.80 8,319,925 6.84 GEORGETOWN 3,787 1,448,121 452,976 21,010,793 6.89 9,868,423 14.67 GEORGIA 0 276,595 0 9,721,337 2.85 4,464,690 6.20 GEORGIA TECH 0 102,743 0 7,395,562 1.39 3,235,995 3.17 GUELPH 93,402 6,829,523 510,234 99,746,303 6.85 26,534,161 25.74 HARVARD 2,968 564,089 0 14,764,456 3.82 6,165,344 9.15 HAWAII 0 4,009 0 15,379,689 0.03 6,866,468 0.06 HOUSTON 1,079 1,054,109 30,244 32,996,914 3.19 11,979,981 8.80 ILLINOIS, URBANA 0 826,310 29,428 31,030,300 2.66 12,520,640 6.60 INDIANA 12,193 765,783 7,760 23,164,534 3.31 10,349,894 7.40 IOWA 36,383 682,659 55,047 16,482,631 4.14 8,870,892 7.70 IOWA STATE 2,177 476,072 0 28,109,777 1.69 11,347,362 4.20 JOHNS HOPKINS U/A Unavailable 21

ARL PRESERVATION STATISTICS 2002-03 TABLE 2 EXPENDITURES Total Salaries & Wages Contract Conservation Contract Binding Contract Preservation: Photocopy Contract Preservation: Microfilm Other Contract Expend. Total Contract Expend. Supplies (Survey Question #) (6d) (7a) (7b) (7c) (7d) (7e) (7f) (8) INSTITUTION Notes KANSAS LMB+ 453,741 985 146,125 19,043 0 0 166,153 46,479 KENT STATE + 84,501 0 70,244 0 0 0 70,244 6,000 KENTUCKY LM+ 527,998 9,000 218,414 0 0 13,000 240,414 75,338 LAVAL LM+ 179,707 14,701 0 0 0 0 14,701 37,378 LOUISIANA STATE L+ 240,861 2,690 91,070 0 0 0 93,760 52,167 LOUISVILLE B+ 113,700 0 134,010 0 0 0 134,010 10,610 MCGILL LM+ U/A 21,481 126,995 0 0 0 148,475 2,804 MCMASTER + 118,871 0 101,289 0 1,324 0 102,613 9,448 MARYLAND + 714,216 18,978 123,129 11,891 7,538 87,581 249,117 47,750 MASSACHUSETTS + 93,187 0 119,950 517 754 0 121,221 6,781 MIT + 421,371 2,287 211,852 11,850 0 0 225,989 19,158 MIAMI LM+ 394,057 0 143,815 0 0 0 143,815 22,908 MICHIGAN LM+ 1,136,373 44,965 397,507 0 32,935 267,734 743,141 50,019 MICHIGAN STATE + 414,370 5,930 240,652 1,256 29,990 76,900 354,728 11,158 MINNESOTA LM+ 384,055 73,050 337,864 33,395 31,780 0 476,089 7,649 MONTREAL LM+ 163,690 16,047 88,800 0 11,352 0 116,200 7,756 NEBRASKA + 267,839 1,436 171,819 0 14,115 530 187,900 10,289 NEW MEXICO LM+ 251,564 0 157,365 0 0 0 157,365 19,546 NEW YORK LM+ 457,448 134 561,856 17,950 61,022 5,979 646,941 31,085 NORTH CAROLINA LM+ 810,346 17,697 246,722 0 0 11,200 275,619 92,768 NORTH CAROLINA STATE + 353,688 18,632 152,078 75 18,568 0 189,353 32,940 NORTHWESTERN LM+ 598,050 0 222,867 28,095 33,032 53,040 337,034 34,970 NOTRE DAME LB+ 325,607 875 121,468 7,959 12,880 53,026 196,208 28,528 OHIO MB+ 253,749 7,610 101,278 0 993 27,074 136,955 12,604 OHIO STATE LM+ 694,108 0 295,297 23,842 4,723 851 324,713 63,650 OKLAHOMA LMB+ 79,265 6,432 179,801 1,732 0 0 187,965 10,385 OKLAHOMA STATE + 107,139 0 24,712 0 0 0 24,712 9,842 PENNSYLVANIA LM+ 299,909 22,100 384,066 2,589 3,845 0 412,600 19,036 PENNSYLVANIA STATE B+ 389,385 36,225 434,381 353 9,738 152,643 633,340 37,942 PITTSBURGH B+ 116,527 39,830 204,950 28,000 12,000 50,000 334,780 11,500 PRINCETON + 691,443 0 520,513 58,730 0 54,204 633,447 156,907 PURDUE + 157,497 3,869 123,541 0 0 0 127,410 1,000 QUEEN'S LM+ 152,957 0 95,298 0 0 0 95,298 3,336 RICE + 203,385 3,777 87,745 0 0 3,854 95,376 14,946 ROCHESTER MB+ 274,471 51,844 117,967 17,238 1,235 11,220 199,504 34,973 RUTGERS LB+ 251,800 17,000 203,643 0 0 0 220,643 6,560 SASKATCHEWAN LM+ 87,427 0 68,629 0 0 0 68,629 66 SOUTH CAROLINA L+ 142,000 0 170,079 0 12,000 0 182,079 15,000 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LMB+ 190,293 0 232,888 0 9,747 0 242,635 44,264 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS LM+ 198,726 0 153,734 0 0 0 153,734 16,653 SUNY-ALBANY + 219,650 500 95,924 0 2,945 6,316 105,685 13,402 SUNY-BUFFALO LM+ 474,039 0 144,309 0 0 11,905 156,214 16,220 SUNY-STONY BROOK + 100,060 6,861 73,318 1,500 14,026 28,714 124,419 15,864 + - See Footnotes L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses M - Includes Medical library U/A - Unavailable 22

ARL PRESERVATION STATISTICS 2002-03 TABLE 2 EXPENDITURES Equipment Total Preserv. Expend. Preserv. Expend. from External Sources Library Expend. (from ARL Statistics) Preserv. as % of Total Library Expend. Materials Expend. (from ARL Statistics) Preserv. as % of Total Materials Expend. (9) (10) (11) -a- -b- -c- -d- (Survey Question #) INSTITUTION 698 667,071 0 18,682,568 3.57 7,707,396 8.65 KANSAS 0 160,745 0 11,192,604 1.44 3,780,582 4.25 KENT STATE 9,100 852,850 15,759 20,261,308 4.21 9,444,910 9.03 KENTUCKY 6,100 237,886 70,740 11,779,939 2.02 5,115,343 4.65 LAVAL 0 386,788 0 12,564,430 3.08 5,433,473 7.12 LOUISIANA STATE 20,778 279,098 0 16,926,028 1.65 8,661,842 3.22 LOUISVILLE 603 151,882 0 19,004,669 0.80 10,593,109 1.43 MCGILL 0 230,932 1,126 9,544,732 2.42 4,732,300 4.88 MCMASTER 435 1,011,518 9,500 21,071,290 4.80 6,475,014 15.62 MARYLAND 431 221,620 23,684 12,101,955 1.83 5,355,780 4.14 MASSACHUSETTS 71,319 737,837 0 18,122,592 4.07 6,629,912 11.13 MIT 77,341 638,121 154,012 18,779,139 3.40 9,081,112 7.03 MIAMI 24,192 1,953,725 325,341 48,193,379 4.05 19,235,775 10.16 MICHIGAN 0 780,256 124,136 20,616,822 3.78 8,273,171 9.43 MICHIGAN STATE 1,550 869,343 97,686 31,413,131 2.77 10,831,123 8.03 MINNESOTA 0 287,646 0 16,659,072 1.73 6,700,042 4.29 MONTREAL 52,083 518,111 74,115 12,811,875 4.04 5,796,104 8.94 NEBRASKA 0 428,475 147,350 18,425,579 2.33 5,963,385 7.19 NEW MEXICO 1,324 1,136,798 61,022 34,451,768 3.30 12,645,171 8.99 NEW YORK 10,874 1,189,607 71,284 28,662,816 4.15 10,929,047 10.88 NORTH CAROLINA 8,248 584,229 53,494 26,790,033 2.18 9,211,644 6.34 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 4,800 974,854 37,897 24,611,853 3.96 10,749,457 9.07 NORTHWESTERN 200 550,543 0 19,349,779 2.85 8,661,702 6.36 NOTRE DAME 6,448 409,756 37,440 11,998,414 3.42 4,738,149 8.65 OHIO 14,931 1,097,402 14,931 27,045,276 4.06 11,927,635 9.20 OHIO STATE 250 277,865 0 15,260,864 1.82 8,650,451 3.21 OKLAHOMA 0 141,693 0 11,046,332 1.28 4,672,696 3.03 OKLAHOMA STATE 0 731,545 0 30,744,202 2.38 12,148,736 6.02 PENNSYLVANIA 12,103 1,072,770 112,740 41,819,383 2.57 15,407,047 6.96 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 0 462,807 18,000 25,641,654 1.80 11,520,738 4.02 PITTSBURGH 23,192 1,504,989 83,850 33,134,612 4.54 12,866,304 11.70 PRINCETON 0 285,907 0 17,442,905 1.64 6,809,343 4.20 PURDUE 0 251,591 0 11,443,000 2.20 5,806,275 4.33 QUEEN'S 4,768 318,475 0 14,663,440 2.17 8,353,514 3.81 RICE 7,383 516,331 212,000 15,494,166 3.33 5,686,913 9.08 ROCHESTER 1,700 480,703 17,700 29,398,458 1.64 9,909,612 4.85 RUTGERS 0 156,123 0 9,278,132 1.68 4,271,307 3.66 SASKATCHEWAN 8,000 347,079 0 16,122,269 2.15 5,918,877 5.86 SOUTH CAROLINA 0 477,192 0 30,933,047 1.54 12,048,097 3.96 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 539 369,652 0 13,947,156 2.65 6,636,367 5.57 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 4,475 343,212 125,225 12,089,513 2.84 4,468,842 7.68 SUNY-ALBANY 0 646,473 150,518 18,299,716 3.53 7,404,956 8.73 SUNY-BUFFALO 0 240,343 0 12,622,268 1.90 6,020,706 3.99 SUNY-STONY BROOK U/A Unavailable 23

ARL PRESERVATION STATISTICS 2002-03 TABLE 2 EXPENDITURES Total Salaries & Wages Contract Conservation Contract Binding Contract Preservation: Photocopy Contract Preservation: Microfilm Other Contract Expend. Total Contract Expend. Supplies (Survey Question #) (6d) (7a) (7b) (7c) (7d) (7e) (7f) (8) INSTITUTION Notes SYRACUSE L+ 263,003 6,534 59,337 0 170 602 66,643 34,491 TEMPLE LMB+ 249,355 0 101,511 0 0 6,721 108,232 4,331 TENNESSEE LMB+ 269,978 0 139,659 3,242 0 0 142,901 8,349 TEXAS L+ 870,145 60 143,362 291 28,990 18,110 190,813 73,078 TEXAS A&M MB+ 238,757 16,287 202,889 209 0 0 219,385 19,073 TEXAS TECH + 124,072 0 45,494 0 0 0 45,494 2,216 TORONTO MB+ 565,379 0 301,048 0 0 0 301,048 17,216 TULANE LM+ 121,176 0 126,083 0 0 0 126,083 11,786 UTAH + 229,527 0 150,017 0 9,550 0 159,567 66,022 VANDERBILT LM+ 346,685 6,679 157,452 0 0 0 164,131 15,000 VIRGINIA + 69,025 2,765 55,017 12,959 0 0 70,741 16,864 VIRGINIA TECH + 155,649 0 125,342 0 0 0 125,342 18,426 WASHINGTON LM+ 494,400 7,541 296,370 18,189 52,516 45,987 420,603 36,361 WASHINGTON STATE B+ 65,914 0 74,167 0 1,064 0 75,231 20 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS LM+ 209,285 6,000 125,099 5,000 0 1,000 137,099 17,182 WATERLOO + 70,251 1,159 55,351 0 0 0 56,510 4,304 WAYNE STATE LMB+ 166,619 176 69,209 0 0 0 69,385 500 WESTERN ONTARIO L+ 32,729 0 93,220 0 0 U/A 93,220 6,622 WISCONSIN LM+ 768,595 10,197 281,252 414 0 7,637 299,500 54,802 YALE M+ 981,480 147,293 523,675 44,158 181,119 599,956 1,496,201 75,363 YORK LB+ 86,828 0 129,133 0 0 0 129,133 9,186 BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY + 275,853 19,580 200,913 0 52,330 0 272,823 7,495 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS L+ 6,048,269 99,705 1,491,722 11,610 1,954,204 4,201,713 7,758,954 1,477,684 NATL. AGRICULTURAL LIB. + 435,056 14,000 U/A U/A 15,000 45,297 74,297 56,295 NATL. LIBRARY OF CANADA + 652,909 0 5,777 0 0 14,598 20,376 161,520 NATL. LIBRARY OF MEDICINE M+ 1,094,151 166,446 112,344 6,956 793,763 829,578 1,909,087 51,576 NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY + 1,265,554 103,968 599,770 2,184 21,805 84,926 812,653 245,155 NEW YORK STATE LIBRARY LM+ 291,119 0 23,372 0 0 0 23,372 35,672 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION B+ 275,377 3,400 31,520 0 0 7,842 42,762 7,514 SUMMARY DATA Total Salaries & Wages Contract Conservation Contract Binding Contract Preservation: Photocopy Contract Preservation: Microfilm Other Contract Expend. Total Contract Expend. Supplies (Survey Question #) (6d) (7a) (7b) (7c) (7d) (7e) (7f) (8) University Medians 265,541 875 148,513 0 0 0 167,820 17,182 University Totals 40,262,168 1,490,823 21,391,738 640,803 1,544,074 2,884,258 27,951,696 3,164,034 Nonuniversity Medians 543,983 16,790 112,344 0 18,403 29,947 173,560 53,936 Nonuniversity Totals 10,338,288 407,099 2,465,418 20,750 2,837,102 5,183,954 10,914,324 2,042,911 GRAND TOTAL 50,600,456 1,897,922 23,857,156 661,553 4,381,176 8,068,212 38,866,019 5,206,945 NUMBER OF LIBRARIES 114 115 114 113 115 114 115 115 + - See Footnotes L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses M - Includes Medical library U/A - Unavailable 24

ARL PRESERVATION STATISTICS 2002-03 TABLE 2 EXPENDITURES Equipment Total Preserv. Expend. Preserv. Expend. from External Sources Library Expend. (from ARL Statistics) Preserv. as % of Total Library Expend. Materials Expend. (from ARL Statistics) Preserv. as % of Total Materials Expend. (9) (10) (11) -a- -b- -c- -d- (Survey Question #) INSTITUTION 0 364,137 125,655 13,762,607 2.65 4,785,375 7.61 SYRACUSE 142,598 504,516 258,444 14,031,180 3.60 6,071,909 8.31 TEMPLE 0 421,228 0 20,907,531 2.01 9,764,650 4.31 TENNESSEE 1,580 1,135,616 192,207 36,671,492 3.10 12,688,944 8.95 TEXAS 585 477,800 0 24,468,359 1.95 9,936,399 4.81 TEXAS A&M 0 171,782 0 17,653,897 0.97 7,707,153 2.23 TEXAS TECH 0 883,643 105,944 43,844,739 2.02 16,060,860 5.50 TORONTO 692 259,737 0 13,188,979 1.97 6,258,951 4.15 TULANE 0 455,116 0 21,991,323 2.07 7,643,887 5.95 UTAH 0 525,816 0 19,030,188 2.76 8,417,130 6.25 VANDERBILT 0 156,630 U/A 26,867,504 0.58 8,588,201 1.82 VIRGINIA 0 299,417 0 11,784,611 2.54 5,749,272 5.21 VIRGINIA TECH 14,462 965,826 2,100 28,464,332 3.39 8,556,561 11.29 WASHINGTON 0 141,165 0 12,996,078 1.09 5,456,438 2.59 WASHINGTON STATE 0 363,566 0 29,034,275 1.25 9,357,748 3.89 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 0 131,065 0 9,064,703 1.45 3,969,875 3.30 WATERLOO 25,000 261,504 78,871 20,872,530 1.25 7,082,004 3.69 WAYNE STATE 20,990 153,561 0 12,320,463 1.25 6,997,428 2.19 WESTERN ONTARIO 3,574 1,126,471 27,348 39,281,520 2.87 10,382,146 10.85 WISCONSIN 864 2,553,908 0 56,500,431 4.52 24,965,321 10.23 YALE 0 225,147 0 13,135,179 1.71 5,505,402 4.09 YORK 0 556,171 0 31,934,315 1.74 4,010,254 13.87 BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY 2,066,437 17,351,344 852,822 586,292,000 2.96 11,335,042 153.08 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 155,218 720,866 86,283 20,693,897 3.48 1,825,107 39.50 NATL. AGRICULTURAL LIB. 14,775 849,580 0 27,674,520 3.07 1,219,774 69.65 NATL. LIBRARY OF CANADA 40,924 3,095,738 0 49,431,918 6.26 6,217,417 49.79 NATL. LIBRARY OF MEDICINE 17,692 2,341,054 513,984 53,921,568 4.34 13,735,150 17.04 NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY 3,500 353,663 126,000 11,723,330 3.02 3,330,789 10.62 NEW YORK STATE LIBRARY 830 326,483 830 8,983,329 3.63 1,933,150 16.89 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION SUMMARY DATA Equipment Total Preserv. Expend. Preserv. Expend. from External Sources Library Expend. (from ARL Statistics) Materials Expend. (from ARL Statistics) (9) (10) (11) -a- -c- (Survey Question #) 594 477,192 0 19,004,669 8,273,171 University Medians 861,113 72,239,010 5,746,694 2,373,742,478 938,777,815 University Totals 16,233 785,223 43,557 29,804,417 3,670,522 Nonuniversity Medians 2,299,376 25,594,899 1,579,919 790,654,877 43,606,683 Nonuniversity Totals 3,160,488 97,833,909 7,326,613 3,164,397,355 982,384,498 GRAND TOTAL 114 115 113 115 115 NUMBER OF LIBRARIES U/A Unavailable 25