Approval of the East African Qualifications Framework for Higher Education for Its Operationalization

Similar documents
State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

The Isett Seta Career Guide 2010

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

An APEL Framework for the East of England

Setting the Scene: ECVET and ECTS the two transfer (and accumulation) systems for education and training

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Addressing TB in the Mines: A Multi- Sector Approach in Practice

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR BASIC EDUCATION STANDARD I AND II

The Referencing of the Irish National Framework of Qualifications to EQF

Academic Program Assessment Prior to Implementation (Policy and Procedures)

BOLOGNA DECLARATION ACHIEVED LEVEL OF IMPLEMENTATION AND FUTURE ACTIVITY PLAN

DRAFT DRAFT SOUTH AFRICAN NURSING COUNCIL RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STANDARDS PREPARED BY:

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

TRAVEL & TOURISM CAREER GUIDE. a world of career opportunities

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning

What is the added value of a Qualifications Framework? The experience of Malta.

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

A European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning

Programme Specification

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Programme Specification

Faculty of Social Sciences

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

The DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Programme

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Interview on Quality Education

Programme Specification

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -

The EQF Referencing report of the Kosovo NQF for General Education, VET and Higher Education

THE EDUCATION COMMITTEE ECVCP

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

Tanzania Commission for Universities

Recognition of Prior Learning

GENERAL INFORMATION STUDIES DEGREE PROGRAMME PERIOD OF EXECUTION SCOPE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE OF STUDY CODE DEGREE

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Primary Award Title: BSc (Hons) Applied Paramedic Science PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Services for Children and Young People

MODULE 4 Data Collection and Hypothesis Development. Trainer Outline

GENERAL NOTICES ALGEMENE KENNISGEWINGS

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading

Irtiqa a Programme: Guide for the inspection of schools in The Emirate of Abu Dhabi

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Chiltern Training Ltd.

IMPACTFUL, QUANTIFIABLE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL?

Doctor in Engineering (EngD) Additional Regulations

CAUL Principles and Guidelines for Library Services to Onshore Students at Remote Campuses to Support Teaching and Learning

Course Specification Executive MBA via e-learning (MBUSP)

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE 203, BARRACKPORE TRUNK ROAD KOLKATA

APAC Accreditation Summary Assessment Report Department of Psychology, James Cook University

Self-certification of the NQFs of the Netherlands and Flanders Mark Frederiks

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

Specification. BTEC Specialist qualifications. Edexcel BTEC Level 1 Award/Certificate/Extended Certificate in Construction Skills (QCF)

European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

LAW ON HIGH SCHOOL. C o n t e n t s

Status of the MP Profession in Europe

September 6-8. San Francisco, California 1

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

THE 2016 FORUM ON ACCREDITATION August 17-18, 2016, Toronto, ON

Programme Specification (Postgraduate) Date amended: 25 Feb 2016

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

PROJECT DESCRIPTION SLAM

OECD THEMATIC REVIEW OF TERTIARY EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW

Assessment and national report of Poland on the existing training provisions of professionals in the Healthcare Waste Management industry REPORT: III

Pharmaceutical Medicine

Knowledge for the Future Developments in Higher Education and Research in the Netherlands

Education in Armenia. Mher Melik-Baxshian I. INTRODUCTION

Overview. Contrasts in Current Approaches to Quality Assurance of Universities in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand

Programme Specification 1

Meeting on the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) and Good Practices in Skills Development

No educational system is better than its teachers

Conventions. Declarations. Communicates

Study on the implementation and development of an ECVET system for apprenticeship

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

CARDIFF UNIVERSITY OF WALES UNITED KINGDOM. Christine Daniels 1. CONTEXT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALES AND OTHER SYSTEMS

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA

Transcription:

11 May 2015 Approval of the East African Qualifications Framework for Higher Education for Its Operationalization PRESS RELEASE The coming into force of the EAC Common Market Protocol in July 2010 prompted the urgent need to develop tools and systems that would facilitate its operationalization. In the case of higher education, there was need to develop tools for the operationalization of Article 11 of the Protocol in order to facilitate easy mobility of learners and labour, which among others, requires the establishment of a framework to enable mutual recognition of academic and professional qualifications across the region. This prompted IUCEA to embark on the development of the East African Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (EAQFHE), which would be an important tool for harmonization of education and training systems and the qualifications attained, and thus contributing towards transforming East Africa into a common higher education area. It will also be an appropriate guide to facilitate mutual recognition of qualifications among the Partner States. Globally, qualifications frameworks are regarded as all encompassing tools for guiding a systematic approach to human resources development. Qualifications frameworks are also designed to serve as useful instruments for guiding higher education institutions in curriculum development, delivery, assessment and certification, in line with the needs of the labour market. Hence, the EAQFHE has been designed both as a higher education supportive tool and as an instrument for guiding structured human resources development in the Community, focusing on skills and competences, and relevance of such skills and competences to the region's socio-economic needs. In 2012 IUCEA initiated the process to develop the EAQFHE, in collaboration with the national commissions and councils for higher education and higher education institutions in the EAC Partner States, as well as the East African Business Council (EABC). At the initial stages the process focused on a qualifications framework that was perceived as applicable only to higher education and training systems. However, it was later realized that despite guiding higher education and training systems in curriculum design, delivery, assessment and certification, a qualifications framework was also a human resource development instrument than only being a higher education tool. Therefore, in September 2013 the process to develop the EAQFHE was restarted, with the involvement not only of national commissions and councils for higher education and higher education institutions, but also the governments of the EAC Partner States through the Ministries responsible for education and labour, other government departments, the private sector through EABC, private sector associations, foundations, or alliances in the Partner states, and employers' and professional associations. It was also recognized that as the first step towards the development of the qualifications framework, a study be carried out to establish the status of higher education in the region and to identify skills gaps in the education and training systems versus human resources needs in the Community. Results from the study were expected to be a major input in the development of the EAQFHE. Therefore, in October 2013 to February 2014 IUCEA in collaboration with EABC carried out the survey in all the Partner States. The

successful conclusion of this process led to the development of a draft EAQFHE, which then underwent several refinement stages, including incorporation of views from stakeholders provided during a stakeholders' forum that was held in May 2014, and views collected through the press. (b) Linkage of the EAQFHE to the National Qualifications Frameworks of the Partner States It is expected that each Partner State will develop a national qualifications framework that is aligned, but not necessarily identical to the EAQFHE. The EAQFHE will only guide the alignment of the national qualifications frameworks to the regional set up for EAC to operate as a common higher education area. This will facilitate comparability of the education and training systems and the qualifications attained in the Partner States. It will also facilitate a more systematic approach to human resource development in the Community. The EAQFHE will also provide mechanisms for streamlining qualifications, thereby simplifying their comparability and mutual recognition nationally, regionally, and globally. The mutual recognition arrangement provided by the EAQFHE covers all types of qualifications, regardless of the mode of programme delivery or training system, so long as the minimum number of credits required for a particular award or qualification type has been attained. The EAQFHE is a generic instrument for the region, onto which the Partner States' national qualifications frameworks will be anchored for the purpose of harmonization and synchronization of education and training systems, and the qualifications attained in the Community. The framework is by no means a replacement of the national qualifications framework or similar instruments of the Partner States, nor is it a prescription for each Partner State to make its national qualifications framework exactly the same as the EAQFHE. Rather, it is meant to be an instrument to guide the Partner States' qualifications framework for alignment with the regional framework, so that the regional education and training systems and the qualifications attained are appropriately harmonized. The concept of a qualifications framework is new to East African, and elsewhere. However, where similar frameworks are fully operational, they have offered enormous benefits towards harmonization of education and training systems, and the qualifications attained, and in guiding systematic approach to human resource development. Therefore, such benefits should be foreseen to the Community. However, new as it is, it is important that appropriate sensitization and advocacy strategies are developed and implemented by IUCEA and the Partner States. It is also important for the users of the EAQFHE to realize the importance of the framework and hence to fully accept it as a guiding tool for the region's education and training systems, and in guiding systematic human resources development processes. In adopting this new approach in higher education and training, and in human resources development, it is very important that the users of the qualifications framework apply it with an open mind for the region to realize the intended purpose of facilitating mutual recognition of qualifications among the Partner States, thereby promoting free movement of learners and labour for the eventual attainment of the Community's socio-economic development and regional integration. (c) Salient Features of the EAQFHE

(i) Reference Levels The core of the EAQFHE concerns reference levels describing what a learner knows, understands and is able to do. These parameters are known as learning outcomes. In the EAQFHE levels of national qualifications will be placed at one of the central reference levels, ranging from Level 1 to Level 8. Each qualifications level is defined by, among others, level descriptors, which are relevant to the majority of programmes at that level. The EAQFHE levels define the relative complexity and depth achievement and the autonomy required of graduates to demonstrate that achievement. In the EAQFHE there are 8 levels, with level 1 being the less complex. The levels are defined by criteria (descriptor) expressed as learning outcomes (acquired knowledge and/or skills). (ii) Level Descriptors These are generic outcome statements of what a learner is expected to have achieved at the end of a level of learning. (iii) Volume of Learning This is an integral part of the descriptor for each qualifications type. It identifies the notional duration of all activities required for the achievement of the learning outcomes specified for a particular EAQFHE qualifications type. It is expressed in equivalent notional hours. (iv) Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) This is the acknowledgement through assessment of a person's knowledge, skills and competences acquired through previous training, work or life experience. It is the acknowledgement of skills, competencies, knowledge and work ethos obtained through informal training, on-the-job experience and life experiences when measured against specific learning outcomes. RPL is one of the entry qualifications to the different education and training levels indicated in the EAQFHE. (v) Credit System Credit is a measurement unit for notional or average learning time. The notional learning time includes all the activities, which a learner is expected to undertake in order to achieve the designated learning outcome. That is, a credit is awarded when the specific set of learning outcomes for a module or programme has been successfully demonstrated. (vi) East African Credit Accumulation and Transfer System (EACAT) EAQFHE recognizes EACAT as the standard for comparing the study attainment and performance of learners of higher education across the East African Community and with other countries. EACAT shall be used to monitor, record and reward learning achievements and facilitate movement between programmes and institutions. (vii) Assessment and Award of Credit

Institutions shall specify in their individual assessment regulations what their requirements are, including the number of credits to be achieved, both for progression within a programme and for the award of a qualification. (viii) Programme Benchmarks EAQFHE provides for the development of Programme benchmarks, which are statements written for programmes studied in higher education and they represent the outcome of discussion in a group of subject specialists on what might be the typical achievements of learners when they graduate with an honours degree in that subject area. (ix) Naming and Awarding of Qualifications Public understanding of the achievements represented by higher education qualifications requires a transparent use of qualifications titles. Therefore, in order to ensure that the name given to any qualifications within the EAQFHE appropriately represents its level, and to promote public understanding of the achievements represented by higher education qualifications, clarity in the use of qualifications titles is required. Thus, the EAQFHE gives policy guidelines for this purpose. (x) Verification of Qualifications Verification of qualifications and the organisations authorised to issue these qualifications shall be through the EAQFHE established Register. At Partner State level, each authorised accreditation and issuing organisation shall also establish a Register for this purpose. (xi) Management and Operationalization Arrangement EAQFHE shall be administered through IUCEA. At national level an EAQFHE national coordination point shall be designated for this purpose in each Partner State. (xii) Qualifications Review Both national and provider qualifications registered on the EAQFHE will be subjected to periodic reviews to ensure that they maintain relevance and that the outcomes are still appropriate and consistent with similar qualifications. For national qualifications, the normal period of NQF qualification registration is five years but IUCEA may initiate an earlier review if circumstances demand it. Provider qualifications will be reviewed by IUCEA as part of programme accreditation and/or the quality audit

(d) Approval The EAC Council of Ministers at its 31st Meeting held on 30th April 2015 in Arusha, Tanzania approved the East African Qualifications Framework for Higher Education for operationalization. (e) Next Steps leading to Operationalization of the EAQFHE After the Qualifications Framework having been approved by the Council of Ministers, IUCEA is now required to put in place instruments that will enable operationalization of the Qualifications Framework. But for the immediate IUCEA will undertake sensitization of those who are supposed to implement the qualifications framework in the commissions/councils for higher/university education, higher education institutions, Partner State Governments, employers, the private sector, and all other stakeholders. The EAQFHE is the EAC policy for regulated qualifications in the EAC-Partner State education and training. It mainstreams the qualifications of each Partner State, and education and training sector into a single regional qualifications framework. Therefore, after the approval of the EAQFHE by the Council of Ministers, each EAC Partner State will develop national systems mechanisms for its operationalization that will be guided by a national qualifications framework that links to the regional Qualifications framework. (f) When do we have a harmonized education system in EAC? Harmonization of higher education systems is a process, and the frameworks we are developing are meant to guide that process. The qualifications framework and quality assurance system that we have already established are the main frameworks for the harmonization process. When the education systems in the Partner States will have been based on these frameworks, then only will we have attained complete harmonization of our higher education systems, and that is a long-term process, which will only happen gradually. Mayunga H.H. Nkunya EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Kampala: 4th May 2015 Source : http://allafrica.com/stories/201505130546.html