ASSESSMENT TASK COVER SHEET (UNIT 1, OUTCOME 1)

Similar documents
CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Arabic. Victorian Certificate of Education Study Design. Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority 2004

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

Language Acquisition Chart

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

4 Almost always mention the topic and the overall idea of simple. 3 Oftentimes mention the topic and the overall idea of simple

Primary English Curriculum Framework

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

One Stop Shop For Educators

Monticello Community School District K 12th Grade. Spanish Standards and Benchmarks

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

GOLD Objectives for Development & Learning: Birth Through Third Grade

November 2012 MUET (800)

Creating Travel Advice

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

The Use of Drama and Dramatic Activities in English Language Teaching

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

Dickinson ISD ELAR Year at a Glance 3rd Grade- 1st Nine Weeks

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Curriculum MYP. Class: MYP1 Subject: French Teacher: Chiara Lanciano Phase: 1

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Tap vs. Bottled Water

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

Reading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers

This publication is also available for download at

English: Contemporary First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Voices Grade 11, University Preparation NBE3U

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

Grade 7. Prentice Hall. Literature, The Penguin Edition, Grade Oregon English/Language Arts Grade-Level Standards. Grade 7

WebQuest - Student Web Page

Wheelchair Rugby. The performance of skills and techniques in isolation/unopposed situations

Lower and Upper Secondary

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Grade 6: Module 2A: Unit 2: Lesson 8 Mid-Unit 3 Assessment: Analyzing Structure and Theme in Stanza 4 of If

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Sample Goals and Benchmarks

GENERAL COMMENTS Some students performed well on the 2013 Tamil written examination. However, there were some who did not perform well.

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

Create A City: An Urban Planning Exercise Students learn the process of planning a community, while reinforcing their writing and speaking skills.

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Grade 6: Module 4: Unit 3: Overview

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Pennsylvania Common Core Standards English Language Arts Grade 11

Loveland Schools Literacy Framework K-6

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

English IV Version: Beta

Public Speaking Rubric

Predatory Reading, & Some Related Hints on Writing. I. Suggestions for Reading

Transcription:

YEAR 11 FIRST LANGUAGE Chinese First Language, Indonesian First Language, Japanese First Language and Korean First Language ASSESSMENT TASK COVER SHEET (UNIT 1, OUTCOME 1) Establish and maintain a spoken or written exchange related to an issue of interest or concern. Student name: Student number: Teacher: Date: / / Feedback: Assessment task 1: Discussion OR Personal letter/fax/email. Your Assessment Task for Unit 1, Outcome 1 has / has not yet been completed satisfactorily*. * Parent/guardian contacted on Please turn over. (date)

The circled range below is an indication of your performance in this Assessment Task. Please read the FEEDBACK section on the front page carefully. Performance descriptors MARK RANGE DESCRIPTOR: typical performance in each range 10 9 marks Outstanding ability to explain, persuade or comment on an issue of interest or concern, appropriate to the topic. Consistently exchanges ideas on relevant information, linking and sequencing ideas clearly and logically. Applies the conventions of informal dialogue or correspondence very effectively, and where relevant, is sensitive to non-verbal forms of communication and builds on cues provided. Maintains the discussion or correspondence, achieving a very high level of accuracy in the language, including vocabulary, structures, expressions, pronunciation, intonation, stress and tempo. Uses appropriate register for the audience, context, purpose and text type, and tones or script where relevant. 8 7 marks Effectively explains, persuades or comments on an issue of interest or concern, appropriate to the topic. Exchanges ideas on relevant information, linking and sequencing ideas logically. Applies the conventions of informal dialogue or correspondence effectively, and where relevant, builds on non-verbal forms of communication or cues provided. Maintains the discussion or correspondence, achieving a high level of accuracy in the language, including vocabulary, structures, expressions, pronunciation, intonation, stress and tempo. Uses generally appropriate register for the audience, context, purpose, text type, tones or script where relevant. 6 5 marks Explains, persuades or comments on an issue of interest or concern, appropriate to the topic. Exchanges ideas on some relevant information, linking and sequencing ideas. May apply the conventions of informal dialogue or correspondence generally, and where relevant, build on some non-verbal forms of communication or cues provided. The discussion or correspondence may be interrupted by pauses. Achieves accuracy in the language including vocabulary, structures, expressions, pronunciation, intonation, stress and tempo with some inaccuracies. The use of register for the audience, context, purpose, text type, tones or script if applicable may be inaccurate. Makes some false starts or errors. 4 3 marks Uses limited structures to explain, persuade or comment on an issue of interest or concern. Exchanges some relevant ideas. Applies some conventions of informal dialogue or correspondence and build on some non-verbal forms of communication. The discussion or correspondence is disjointed. Achieves limited accuracy in the language, including vocabulary, structures, expressions, pronunciation, intonation, stress and tempo. Demonstrates little understanding of register appropriate to the audience, context, purpose, text type, tones or script if applicable. Makes false starts and errors. 2 1 marks Uses very limited structures to explain, persuade or comment on an issue of interest or concern, presenting few ideas. Demonstrates minimal understanding of the conventions of informal dialogue or correspondence. The level of language is very limited. Frequent errors interfere with the ability to convey meaning.

Student name: YEAR 11 FIRST LANGUAGE Chinese First Language, Indonesian First Language, Japanese First Language and Korean First Language ASSESSMENT TASK COVER SHEET (UNIT 1, OUTCOME 2) Listen to, read and reorganise information and ideas from spoken and written texts. Student number: Teacher: Date: / / Assessment task A (spoken resource): Listen to a spoken text (e.g. discussion, interview, broadcast) and extract and use information and ideas in a different text type AND Assessment task B (written resource): Read a written text (e.g. article, report, letter) and extract and use information/ideas in a different text type. Feedback: Your Assessment Task for Unit 1, Outcome 2 has / has not yet been completed satisfactorily*. * Parent/guardian contacted on Please turn over. (date)

The circled range below is an indication of your performance in this Assessment Task. Please read the FEEDBACK section on the front page carefully. Performance descriptors MARK RANGE DESCRIPTOR: typical performance in each range 10 9 marks Comprehensive understanding of the overall meaning and purpose of the spoken or written texts. Demonstrates highly effective recognition and use of a broad range of vocabulary, structures and content related to the topic. Accurately infers meaning of unfamiliar words or phrases from context and grammatical markers, identifying main points and supporting ideas. Extracts and reorganises the information from one text type to another in a very effective manner by linking items from various parts of the text. Uses a range of successful strategies to confirm meaning and demonstrates perceptive appreciation of cultural aspects critical to understanding the text. 8 7 marks Sound understanding of the meaning and purpose of the spoken or written texts. Demonstrates effective recognition and use of a range of vocabulary, structures and content related to the topic. Accurately infers meaning of most unfamiliar words or phrases from context and grammatical markers, identifying main points and supporting ideas. Extracts and reorganises most information from one text type to another effectively by linking items from various parts of the text. Uses various strategies to confirm meaning and demonstrates keen appreciation of cultural aspects critical to understanding the text. 6 5 marks Understanding of the meaning and purpose of the spoken or written texts is generally appropriate. Demonstrates some recognition and use of a range of vocabulary, structures and content related to the topic. Infers meaning of some unfamiliar words or phrases from context and grammatical markers, identifying main points and supporting ideas. Extracts and reorganises some information from one text type to another in a satisfactory manner by linking items from various parts of the text. Uses some strategies to confirm meaning and demonstrates some appreciation of cultural aspects critical to understanding the text. 4 3 marks Limited understanding of the meaning and purpose of the spoken or written texts. Demonstrates little recognition and use of a range of vocabulary structures and content related to the topic. Infers meaning of few unfamiliar words or phrases from context and grammatical markers, identifying main points and supporting ideas. Limited ability to extract and reorganise information from one text type to another. Uses few strategies to confirm meaning and demonstrates slight appreciation of cultural aspects critical to understanding the text. 2 1 marks Minimal understanding of the meaning and purpose of the spoken or written texts. Extracts little meaning from language, identifying few main points and supporting ideas. Very limited ability to extract and reorganise information from one text type to another and has significant difficulty handling the different text types. Identifies isolated detail and/or single words, demonstrating minimal understanding of cultural aspects critical to understanding the text.

Student name: YEAR 11 FIRST LANGUAGE Chinese First Language, Indonesian First Language, Japanese First Language and Korean First Language ASSESSMENT TASK COVER SHEET (UNIT 1, OUTCOME 3) Produce a personal response to a fictional text. Student number: Teacher: Date: / / Feedback: Assessment task 3: Perform an oral presentation OR Write a review OR Write an article. Your Assessment Task for Unit 1, Outcome 3 has / has not yet been completed satisfactorily*. * Parent/guardian contacted on Please turn over. (date)

The circled range below is an indication of your performance in this Assessment Task. Please read the FEEDBACK section on the front page carefully. Performance descriptors MARK RANGE DESCRIPTOR: typical performance in each range 10 9 marks Presents highly effective personal comment or perspective on aspects of the fictional text, responding accurately and appropriately for the context, audience and purpose described. Uses consistently precise structures related to comparing and/or summarising experiences, opinions, ideas, feelings and reactions by supporting views with accurate evidence from the text. Demonstrates efficient use of relevant reference materials. 8 7 marks Presents effective personal comment or perspective on aspects of the fictional text, responding accurately for the context, audience and purpose described. Uses generally accurate structures related to comparing and/or summarising experiences, opinions, ideas, feelings and reactions by supporting views with mostly accurate evidence from the text. Demonstrates use of relevant reference materials. 6 5 marks Presents some personal comment or perspective on aspects of the fictional text, responding fairly accurately for the context, audience and purpose described. Uses some accurate structures related to comparing and/or summarising experiences, opinions, ideas, feelings and reactions by supporting views with some evidence from the text. Demonstrates some use of relevant reference materials. 4 3 marks Presents limited personal comment or perspective on aspects of the fictional text, responding for the context, audience and purpose described. Uses some structures related to comparing and/or summarising experiences, opinions, ideas, feelings and reactions but views are generally not supported with evidence from the text. Demonstrates limited use of relevant reference materials. 2 1 marks Presents very limited personal comment or perspective on aspects of the fictional text, responding for the context, audience and purpose described. Uses few structures related to comparing and/or summarising experiences, opinions, ideas, feelings and reactions, but views are not supported with evidence from the text. Demonstrates minimal use of relevant reference materials.

Student name: YEAR 11 FIRST LANGUAGE Chinese First Language, Indonesian First Language, Japanese First Language and Korean First Language ASSESSMENT TASK COVER SHEET (UNIT 2, OUTCOME 1) Participate in a spoken or written exchange focusing on the resolution of an issue. Student number: Teacher: Date: / / Feedback: Assessment task 1: Write a formal letter/fax/email OR Participate in a role-play. Your Assessment Task for Unit 2, Outcome 1 has / has not yet been completed satisfactorily*. * Parent/guardian contacted on Please turn over. (date)

The circled range below is an indication of your performance in this Assessment Task. Please read the FEEDBACK section on the front page carefully. Performance descriptors MARK RANGE DESCRIPTOR: typical performance in each range 10 9 marks Consistently achieves a very high level of accuracy when participating in the spoken or written exchange focusing on the resolution of an issue in the role-play or written communication. Makes very effective use of a broad range of structures appropriate to the topic areas by using strategies and structures that clearly persuade, reach agreement or resolve an issue, using fillers, affirming phrases and exclamations if applicable. Links and sequences ideas successfully to add weight to argument. Initiates, maintains, directs and closes the communication using gesture and body language, if applicable, and examples and reasons that enhance meaning and convince. Imitates and responds effectively for audience, context and purpose. 8 7 marks Achieves a high level of accuracy when participating in the spoken or written exchange focusing on the resolution of an issue in the role-play or written communication. Makes effective use of a range of structures appropriate to the topic areas by using strategies and structures that persuade, reach agreement or resolve an issue, using fillers, affirming phrases and exclamations if applicable. Links and sequences most ideas successfully to add weight to argument. Initiates, maintains, directs and closes the communication using gesture and body language, if applicable, and examples and reasons that enhance meaning and convince. Imitates and responds quite effectively for audience, context and purpose. 6 5 marks Achieves a satisfactory level of accuracy when participating in the spoken or written exchange focusing on the resolution of an issue in the role-play or written communication. Makes some use of structures appropriate to the topic areas by using strategies and structures that persuade, reach agreement or resolve an issue, using fillers, affirming phrases and exclamations if applicable. Links and sequences some ideas successfully to add weight to argument. Initiates, maintains, directs and closes the communication satisfactorily using gesture and body language, if applicable, and examples and reasons that enhance meaning and convince. Generally imitates and responds adequately for audience, context and purpose. 4 3 marks 2 1 marks Achieves a limited level of accuracy when participating in the spoken or written exchange focusing on the resolution of an issue in the role-play or written communication. Makes little use of structures appropriate to the topic areas that use strategies and structures to persuade, reach agreement or resolve an issue, using fillers, affirming phrases and exclamations if applicable. Links and sequences some ideas successfully to add weight to argument. Significant problems limit the attempt to initiate, maintain, direct or close the communication using gesture and body language, if applicable, and examples and reasons that enhance meaning and convince. Attempts to respond in a limited manner for audience, context and purpose. Achieves minimal accuracy when participating in the spoken or written exchange focusing on the resolution of an issue in the roleplay or written communication. Makes very little use of structures appropriate to the topic areas that use strategies and structures to persuade, reach agreement or resolve an issue, using fillers, affirming phrases and exclamations if applicable. May link and sequence some ideas but does not convince. Significant problems limit the attempt to communicate efficiently for audience, context and purpose.

YEAR 11 FIRST LANGUAGE Chinese First Language, Indonesian First Language, Japanese First Language and Korean First Language ASSESSMENT TASK COVER SHEET (UNIT 2, OUTCOME 2) Listen to, read, and extract and compare information and ideas from spoken and written texts. Student name: Student number: Teacher: Date: / / Assessment task A (spoken resource): Listen to two or more spoken texts (e.g. interviews, discussion, debate) and compare information and ideas obtained in a given format in the Language. AND Assessment task B (written resource): Read two or more written texts (e.g. letters, articles, reports) and compare information and ideas in a given format in the Language. Feedback: Your Assessment Task for Unit 2, Outcome 2 has / has not yet been completed satisfactorily*. * Parent/guardian contacted on Please turn over. (date)

The circled range below is an indication of your performance in this Assessment Task. Please read the FEEDBACK section on the front page carefully. Performance descriptors MARK RANGE DESCRIPTOR: typical performance in each range 10 9 marks Uses a broad range of vocabulary, structures and content to compare ideas by comprehensive recognition of stylistic features such as contrast, repetition and understatement. Consistently infers accurate meaning from linguistic and contextual features. Clearly and accurately summarises, explains and compares information and ideas from different texts accurately inferring points of view, opinions and ideas. Extracts and reorganises information and ideas by logically linking items from various parts of the text, keenly appreciating the cultural aspects critical to understanding the texts. 8 7 marks Uses a sound range of vocabulary, structures and content to compare ideas by recognition of stylistic features such as contrast, repetition and understatement. Generally infers accurate meaning from linguistic and contextual features. Summarises, explains and compares information and ideas appropriately from different texts inferring many points of view, opinions and ideas. Extracts and reorganises information and ideas by linking items from various parts of the text, successfully appreciating the cultural aspects critical to understanding the texts. 6 5 marks Uses a satisfactory range of vocabulary, structures and content to compare ideas by recognition of stylistic features such as contrast, repetition and understatement. Generally infers some meaning from linguistic and contextual features. Summarises, explains and compares some information and ideas from different texts inferring many points of view, opinions and ideas. Extracts and reorganises information and ideas, and may link items from various parts of the text. Appreciates some of the cultural aspects critical to understanding the texts. 4 3 marks Uses a limited range of vocabulary, structures and content to compare ideas but demonstrates little recognition of stylistic features such as contrast, repetition and understatement. May infer some meaning from linguistic and contextual features. Limited ability to summarise, explain and compare information and ideas from different texts or to infer points of view, opinions and ideas. Extracts and reorganises limited information and ideas. Appreciates few of the cultural aspects critical to understanding the texts. 2 1 marks Uses a very limited range of vocabulary, structures and content to compare ideas but demonstrates minimal recognition of stylistic features such as contrast, repetition and understatement. Infers very little meaning from linguistic and contextual features. Minimal ability to summarise, explain and compare information and ideas from different texts or to infer points of view, opinions and ideas. Extracts and reorganises very limited information and ideas. Appreciates very few of the cultural aspects critical to understanding the texts.

Student name: YEAR 11 FIRST LANGUAGE Chinese First Language, Indonesian First Language, Japanese First Language and Korean First Language ASSESSMENT TASK COVER SHEET (UNIT 2, OUTCOME 3) Produce an imaginative piece in spoken or written form. Student number: Teacher: Date: / / Feedback: Assessment task 3: Complete a journal entry OR Present a spoken personal account OR Write a short story Your Assessment Task for Unit 2, Outcome 3 has / has not yet been completed satisfactorily*. * Parent/guardian contacted on Please turn over. (date)

The circled range below is an indication of your performance in this Assessment Task. Please read the FEEDBACK section on the front page carefully. Performance descriptors MARK RANGE DESCRIPTOR: typical performance in each range 10 9 marks Produces a highly effective original imaginative spoken or written text demonstrating comprehensive understanding of the conventions of the text type required. Uses a broad range of structures, vocabulary and expressions related to describing, recounting or narrating. Consistently uses stylistic techniques such as imagery, questions and exclamations. Structures language and writing accurately and sequences main ideas/events clearly and logically for the audience, context and purpose. 8 7 marks Produces an effective original imaginative spoken or written text demonstrating clear understanding of the conventions of the text type required. Uses a range of structures, vocabulary and expressions related to describing, recounting or narrating. Generally uses some stylistic techniques such as imagery, questions and exclamations. Structures language and writing quite accurately and sequences main ideas/events logically for the audience, context and purpose. 6 5 marks Produces a satisfactory imaginative spoken or written text demonstrating adequate understanding of the conventions of the text type required. Uses a narrow range of structures, vocabulary and expressions related to describing, recounting or narrating. May use some stylistic techniques such as imagery, questions and exclamations. Attempts to structure language and writing satisfactorily and sequence main ideas/events for the audience, context and purpose. 4 3 marks Produces a limited imaginative spoken or written text demonstrating some understanding of the conventions of the text type required. Uses a very narrow range of structures, vocabulary and expressions, related to describing, recounting or narrating. Demonstrates little attempt to structure language and writing or to sequence main ideas/events for the audience, context and purpose. Meaning is conveyed although inaccuracies may occur. 2 1 marks Produces a very limited imaginative spoken or written text demonstrating little understanding of the conventions of the text type required. Demonstrates minimal use of structures, vocabulary and expressions related to describing, recounting or narrating, and little attempt to structure language and writing for the audience, context and purpose. Meaning is conveyed although inaccuracies occur.