The Winthrop Plan Success Measures and Metrics

Similar documents
Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Best Colleges Main Survey

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary


BARUCH RANKINGS: *Named Standout Institution by the

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Financing Education In Minnesota

12-month Enrollment

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

LaGrange College. Faculty Handbook

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Northern Kentucky University Department of Accounting, Finance and Business Law Financial Statement Analysis ACC 308

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

University of Arizona

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

ANNUAL SCHOOL REPORT SEDA COLLEGE SUITE 1, REDFERN ST., REDFERN, NSW 2016

Master of Science in Taxation (M.S.T.) Program

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

Online Master of Business Administration (MBA)

In 2010, the Teach Plus-Indianapolis Teaching Policy Fellows, a cohort of early career educators teaching

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

Raw Data Files Instructions

WSU LIBRARIES DECISION MATRIX FY

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Bachelor of Arts in Gender, Sexuality, and Women's Studies

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Consumer Information Boot Camp

Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan

ATHLETIC ENDOWMENT FUND MOUNTAINEER ATHLETIC CLUB

Shelters Elementary School

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

African American Studies Program Self-Study. Professor of History. October 9, 2015

NC Community College System: Overview

Denver Public Schools

For the Ohio Board of Regents Second Report on the Condition of Higher Education in Ohio

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

Program Rating Sheet - University of South Carolina - Columbia Columbia, South Carolina

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

Program Change Proposal:

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

2013 donorcentrics Annual Report on Higher Education Alumni Giving

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

A Diverse Student Body

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

Academic Dean Evaluation by Faculty & Unclassified Professionals

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

Access Center Assessment Report

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

HSC/SOM GOAL 1: IMPROVE HEALTH AND HEALTHCARE IN THE POPULATIONS WE SERVE.

LIM College New York, NY

Transcription:

Support inclusive excellence by expanding our impact on students and our communities through enrollment growth and increases in retention and graduation rates. Fall 2015 Fall 2016 Fall 2017 Fall 2018 Fall 2025 No target Baseline Preliminary estimated 2016 A. Total headcount enrollment 6031 6109 6120 6200 6073 6150 6200 7000 7500 B. One-year retention rate First-Time/Full-Time Freshmen 76.9% 73.3% 78% 80% 76.6% 78% 80% 82% 85% C. Six-year graduation rate First-Time/Full-Time Freshmen 55.5% 58.2% 56% 59% 57% 58% 59% 60% 65% D. Undergraduate student placement rate 90% 89.6% 90.5% 92% 89.5% 90.5% 92% 92% 95% E. Percentage of all students who are AALANA, Asian, or International 39% 40% 40% 41% 39.6% 41% 42% 43% 45% Goal 1 Definitions A. Total Headcount Enrollment: Number of students enrolled, as reported in fall to the state. B. First-Year Retention Rate: First-year retention rate is the percentage of the first-time, full-time freshman cohort returning for the fall semester of their second year. The Fall 2017 rate represents retention of the Fall 2016 cohort. First-year retention rate is an indicator of student success and students continued desire to engage in the Winthrop experience. C. Six-Year Graduation Rate: Six-year graduation rate is the percentage of the first-time, full-time freshman cohort earning a Winthrop bachelor's degree within six years of enrolling. The Fall 2017 rate represents graduation of the Fall 2011 cohort. Six-year graduation rate is an indicator of student success and achievement of a specific academic credential. D. Undergraduate Student Placement Rate: Student placement rate is defined as engaging in employment, advanced education, and/or military service upon graduation. The rate is a weighted average based on data from the annual Graduating Senior Survey and biennial Alumni Survey. Student placement rate reflects graduates' adequate preparation for careers and advanced education. E. Student Diversity: Percentage of enrolled students who self-identified as African American, Latin American, Native American, Asian American, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Asian, two or more races, or international.

Continually enhance the quality of the Winthrop experience for all students by promoting a culture of innovation, with an emphasis on global and community engagement. A. Percentage of undergraduate students who graduate with at least two high-impact practices NSSE 2014 (Rep.2015) NSSE 2016 (Reported 2017) NSSE 2018 (Rep.2019) NSSE 2024 (Rep.2025) Baseline Actual NSSE Avg. Winthrop Seniors NSSE Avg. Winthrop Seniors 62% 79% 79% 80% 61% 70% 79% 80% 84% 89% B. NSSE Diversity Indicator 72% 78% 78% 80% 71% 79% 80% 82% 83% 88% C. NSSE Student-Faculty Interaction Engagement Indicator 34% 45% 45% 47% 33% 49% 50% 52% 52%* 55% *increased based on 2017 results 2015-16 Fall 2017 Fall 2018 Fall 2025 D. Number of new and substantially redesigned programs Baseline +5 +7 +3 +7 +9 +25 +40 Goal 2 Definitions A. NSSE High Impact Practices: The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) allows students to self-report their participation in high impact practices. The NSSE High Impact Practices Indicator signifies the percentage of seniors reporting participation in at least two of the following: learning community, course that included a service-learning project, research project with a faculty member, internship/co-op/practicum, study abroad, and/or capstone course. The NSSE High Impact Practices Indicator reflects the types of activities that enrich the learning experience and help students develop employer-desired skills, including problem solving, teamwork, communication, personal and social responsibility, and critical thinking. B. NSSE Diversity Indicator: The NSSE Diversity Indicator signifies the percentage of seniors reporting having discussions often or very often with students from a different race/ethnicity, economic background, religion, or political perspective than their own. The NSSE Diversity Indicator allows the institution to look beyond the number of diverse students enrolled to the impact of this diversity on the interactions and experiences of all students. C. NSSE Student-Faculty Interaction Indicator: The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) allows students to self-report the frequency of their interactions with faculty. The NSSE Student-Faculty Interaction Indicator denotes the percentage of seniors engaging often or very often with faculty to discuss academic performance; course topics, idea, or concepts outside of class; career plans; or to work on activities other than coursework (e.g., committees, student groups). The NSSE Student-Faculty Interaction Indicator reflects the personalized, student-centered nature of the Winthrop experience. D. Redesigned Programs: Redesigned programs are defined as new and substantially redesigned academic programs, having received full approval by faculty governance and the appropriate regulatory bodies, as required, (i.e., South Carolina Commission on Higher Education, South Carolina Department of Education, Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges). Redesigned programs ensure an intentional, sustained, future-looking assessment of the University s offerings to meet the demands of an ever-evolving educational market.

Goal Attract and retain high quality and diverse faculty, staff, and administrators. A. Percentage of faculty/managerial staff who are AALANA, Asian, or International B. Percentage of full-time employees with salaries at or above the median C. Satisfaction of faculty, staff, and administrators based on one or more rating systems 2015 2017 2018 2025 Baseline Preliminary 14.4% 15% 15.5% 16.4% 17% 18% 18.5% 20% 32% 35% 40% 37% 39% 41% 50% 55% 51% 53% 55% Survey to be administered in AY2017-18 54% 55% 60% 65% Goal 3 Definitions A. Employee Diversity: Employee diversity is determined by the percentage of full-time instructional faculty and managerial staff who identify as African American, Latin American, Native American, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Asian, and/or international. This metric reflects data reported annually to the federal government (IPEDS) in the job categories of full-time Instructional Staff and Management Occupations. Employee diversity highlights Winthrop s commitment to successfully attracting, hiring, and retaining diverse employees. B. Employee Compensation: Employee compensation is assessed through annual salary studies, using a comparison group of regional peer institutions. These studies are used to establish comparative median employee salaries based on job descriptions of staff and administrators and on discipline, rank, and tenure status of faculty. Employee compensation assures that the University appropriately values and supports the work of faculty and staff. C. Employee Satisfaction: The Strategic Planning Working Group Employee Satisfaction Survey allowed faculty and staff to self-report their level of employment satisfaction. This metric identifies the percentage of faculty and staff reporting being satisfied or very satisfied with their experience at Winthrop. Employee satisfaction is crucial in attracting, supporting, and retaining high quality faculty and staff to advance the institutional mission.

Provide facilities, technology, and programs that support Winthrop students and the overall Winthrop experience. Fall 2016 Fall 2017 Fall 2018 Fall 2025 Baseline Actual A. Number of classrooms upgraded with technology ---- +5 +6 +28 +38 +43 +60* +62 B. Student satisfaction with support services 74% 80% 85% 80% 82% 85% 85% 90% C. Number of online/hybrid degree programs 1 +3 +5 +3 +5 +6 +15 +20 *increased based on 2017 results FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY25 D. Expenditures on facilities $11.1M $11.6M $13.5M $13.75M $11.7M $13.75M $14M $15M $22M Goal 4 Definitions A. Classrooms Upgraded with Technology: Classrooms upgraded with technology is defined as the number of classrooms receiving enhancements, including, but not limited to, computers, projectors, collaboration tools, and Wi-Fi. While all of Winthrop's general classrooms are currently equipped with smart technology, the University aspires to maintain and upgrade these technologies to support effective teaching, learning, and collaboration. B. Student Satisfaction with Support Services: The annual Graduating Senior Survey allows students to self-report their level of satisfaction with various student support services. This measurement indicates the percentage of satisfied or neutral responses provided by graduating seniors to each of 26 specific campus services. Student satisfaction indicates the extent to which Winthrop is meeting the needs of students and supporting their educational experience. C. Number of Online/Hybrid Programs: Defined as the number of academic programs delivered fully or partially online. To qualify, a program must have received approval from faculty governance and the appropriate regulatory bodies, as required (i.e., South Carolina Commission on Higher Education, South Carolina Department of Education, Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges). Programs delivered fully or partially online are designed to provide various subpopulations of students with increased flexibility to meet their educational needs. D. Facility Expenditures: Facility expenditures is defined as the total dollars used to maintain and improve the institution s physical facilities, as reported annually to the federal government (IPEDS). Financial investment in the institution's facilities and grounds represents Winthrop's commitment to preserving and maintaining the campus's physical beauty and enhancing the overall student experience.

Ensure financial stability and sustainability. 2015 2017 2018 2025 Preliminary Baseline (as of 6/17) A. Total endowment assets $43.1M* $45M $47.5M $50.3M $52M $55M $80M $90M B. Unrestricted gift revenues $433,362 $500k $600k $567,786** $500k $600k $700k $1M C. Alumni giving rates 8.6%* 9.5% 10% 7% 8% 8.5% 13% 15% D. Scholarship/grant dollars provided to students from University & Foundation $16.4M $16.8M $17M $20M $20M $20.5M $21M*** $22M E. Institutional debt ratio.539.515.50.48.48.47.40.35 *as of end of FY16 **as of end of 2016; includes donor transfer of $200k from restricted to unrestricted category ***increased based on 2017 results Goal 5 Definitions A. Total Endowment Assets: Total endowment assets represent the amount of gross investments for Winthrop and the Winthrop Foundation, as reported annually to the federal government (IPEDS). Invested by the Winthrop Foundation, donated financial assets yield a targeted return to fund scholarships, endowed professorships, faculty enrichment programs, and other educational services provided by the University. Total endowment assets are crucial to Winthrop's financial stability, with the health of the endowment monitored to ensure the highest long-term institutional quality. B. Unrestricted Gift Revenues: Total dollars received without restrictions from donors for the calendar year. These gifts, used at the discretion of the Foundation board, are given to the University in the form of unrestricted scholarships and other institutional support. Unrestricted gift revenues contribute to the institution's financial stability and denote community support for Winthrop's mission and values. C. Alumni Giving Rate: Calculated by dividing the number of undergraduate alumni making a donation in a fiscal year by the number of undergraduate alumni solicited for donations in the same fiscal year. Alumni giving demonstrates graduates satisfaction with their educational experience, continued engagement with the University, and investment in Winthrop s values, as well as contributing to the institution s long-term financial growth and stability. D. Scholarship/Grant Dollars Provided to Students from the University and the Foundation: Scholarships and grants represent total dollars disbursed to students from the University and the Foundation within a fiscal year. Scholarships and grants are essential to fulfill Winthrop's mission of providing access to higher education for students with financial need. This type of funding supports the recruitment of an achievement-oriented, culturally, and economically diverse student body. E. Debt Ratio: Debt ratio is calculated by dividing total institutional debt (exclusive of GASB 68 impact, which, as of 2015, requires government agencies to include their long-term pension obligations as a liability) by total assets. Debt ratio is managed to ensure the long-term financial sustainability of the institution.