Local Control Accountability Plan and Annual Update (LCAP) Template

Similar documents
Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

John F. Kennedy Middle School

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

State Parental Involvement Plan

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

El Toro Elementary School

Financing Education In Minnesota

EMPLOYEE CALENDAR NOTES

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

World s Best Workforce Plan

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

State Budget Update February 2016

Kahului Elementary School

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

JESSAMINE COUNTY SCHOOLS CERTIFIED SALARY SCHEDULE (188 DAYS)

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Geographic Area - Englewood

KDE Comprehensive School. Improvement Plan. Harlan High School

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

Val Verde Unified School District

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Val Verde Unified School District

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Comprehensive Progress Report

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Program Change Proposal:

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Trends & Issues Report

International: Three-Year School Improvement Plan to September 2016 (Year 2)

SY School Performance Plan

Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

The Dropout Crisis is a National Issue

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

Seminole State College Board Regents Regular Meeting

OHIO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION SALARY SCHEDULES Revised 7/3/12

TACOMA HOUSING AUTHORITY

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Entry Plan for the First 100 Days for Tari N. Thomas. Interim Superintendent of Schools Orange, Petersham and RC Mahar Regional

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey Data Collection Webinar

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Executive Summary. Osan High School

A Framework for Safe and Successful Schools

Mooresville Charter Academy

CDS Code

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Executive Summary. Saint Francis Xavier

Kannapolis Charter Academy

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

Program budget Budget FY 2013

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

St Matthew s RC High School

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Hokulani Elementary School

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA ADMINISTRATIVE / PROFESSIONAL PAY PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2015 BENEFITS-ELIGIBLE EXEMPT (MONTHLY) EMPLOYEES

The Single Plan for Student Achievement

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Transcription:

LCAP Year (select from 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20) 2018-19 Local Control Accountability Plan and Annual Update (LCAP) Template Local Control Accountability Plan and Annual Update (LCAP) Template Addendum: General instructions & regulatory requirements. Appendix A: Priorities 5 and 6 Rate Calculations Appendix B: Guiding Questions: Use as prompts (not limits) LCFF Evaluation Rubrics: Essential data to support completion of this LCAP. Please analyze the LEA s full data set; specific links to the rubrics are also provided within the template. LEA Name PACE Academy Enterprise Elementary School District Contact Name and Title Brian N. Winstead Superintendent Email and Phone bwinstead@eesd.net (530) 224-4100 2017-20 Plan Summary The Story Describe the students and community and how the LEA serves them. The PACE Academy family is committed to our students and their families by providing a caring and highly structured program focused on each student s unique needs, so that they may choose to stay on or successfully transition back to a general education campus. Our motto is, Changing lives through celebrating each child s strengths, goals, and successes; providing tools to overcome obstacles, with hope, to meet life s challenges embodies the entire staff s vision of teaching our students the skills to achieve success. PACE Academy consists of six classrooms. There are two playground areas with a basketball hoop and a large field for playing soccer and other field activities. We are staffed at a high teacher-tostudent ratio to best address the needs of students encountering academic failure, behavioral problems, or non-attendance issues. Our Vision Where lives are changed and hope is renewed! Our Mission Positive role modeling from staff, administration, mentors, and volunteers Relationship building as a class, a campus, and a community Individualized learning based on academics and behavior Developing attainable goals through team efforts with staff, students, and parents Engaging students hearts and minds to become their best selves LCAP Highlights Page 1 of 79

Identify and briefly summarize the key features of this year s LCAP. Everything we do should support our mission to empower every child, every day to create a better world. Our focus is to improve student learning. We want to improve services to all of our students and their families. It is critical we better serve low income students, English Learner students, students in Foster Care, and homeless students. Improving the quality of education for students provides them with more opportunities to be successful. We would love to see every student graduate from 12th grade with the necessary tools to extend their education and have the opportunity to attend college. Throughout the LCAP you will see a focus on improving student learning, providing students exposure to technology, improving strategies in order to implement trauma-informed practices. We will accomplish this by hiring the best teachers and offering staff the best possible professional development. We believe teachers need ongoing professional development in order to best serve students and their families. Review of Performance Based on a review of performance on the state indicators and local performance indicators included in the LCFF Evaluation Rubrics, progress toward LCAP goals, local self-assessment tools, stakeholder input, or other information, what progress is the LEA most proud of and how does the LEA plan to maintain or build upon that success? This may include identifying any specific examples of how past increases or improvements in services for low-income students, English learners, and foster youth have led to improved performance for these students. Greatest Progress PACE is a newly established dependent charter school in the Enterprise Elementary School District. PACE used the 2017-2018 assessment data, attendance data, behavior, and suspension data to help plan goals and action steps. PACE used information collected during the EESD LCAP process to help develop the plan for 2018-2019. PACE celebrated a significant growth in student population. PACE increased enrollment by over 25% during the 2017-2018 school year. PACE will serve K-11th grade students during the 2018-2019 school year. PACE will add 12th grade during the 2019-2020 school year. PACE surveyed students, staff, and parents and received very positive feedback on the school atmosphere. PACE is also very proud of the fact they added 9th-11th grade during the 2017-2018 school year. PACE strongest academic area was at 7th grade in English Language Arts. 16.67 percent of students met standard on CASSPP. 7th grade was also the strongest in Math. 5.88 percent of students met standard in Math. Referring to the LCFF Evaluation Rubrics, identify any state indicator or local performance indicator for which overall performance was in the Red or Orange performance category or where the LEA received a Not Met or Not Met for Two or More Years rating. Additionally, identify any areas that the LEA has determined need significant improvement based on review of local performance indicators or other local indicators. What steps is the LEA planning to take to address these areas with the greatest need for improvement? Greatest Needs PACE has struggled to find additional teachers to serve students at PACE. PACE has a core of teachers that are fully committed to working at PACE. It has been a challenge to find new teachers to join the PACE staff. PACE continues to look for teachers that have the desire to serve students in an alternative education environment. PACE has developed a staff that collaborates well and works together to create a positive, healthy, caring school environment. PACE has created a very positive student environment and the staff is committed to serving the students and their families. PACE has done a very good job of bringing in additional resources to serve students at PACE. PACE has a variety of community members and community mentors who work alongside the PACE staff in order Page 2 of 79

to provide additional resources to students. PACE has not shown the academic growth they would like to see. Referring to the LCFF Evaluation Rubrics, identify any state indicator for which performance for any student group was two or more performance levels below the all student performance. What steps is the LEA planning to take to address these performance gaps? Performance Gaps In reviewing data from students who attended PACE during the 2017-2018 school year: 13% of students scored at or above grade level in ELA on CAASPP in 2017 compared to 9% at or above grade level in ELA on CAASPP in 2018. 4% of students scored at or above grade level in Math on CAASPP in 2017 compared to 4.6% at or above grade level in Math on CAASPP in 2018. 2018 P2 i-ready data PACE had a small number of students take the i-ready assessment. Only one K student 1 out of 8 completed i-ready assessment. That student tested on grade level. In first grade 5 out of 7 students completed i-ready assessment. All 5 students tested below grade level. In 2nd grade 6 out of 10 students completed i-ready assessment. 33% tested on grade level and 67% tested below grade level. In third grade 6 out of 8 students completed i-ready assessment. 17% tested on grade level and 83% tested below grade level. In fourth grade 6 out of 6 students completed the i-ready assessment. 17% tested above grade level and 83% tested below grade level. In fifth grade 12 out of 12 students completed i-ready assessment. 8% tested on grade level and 92% tested below grade level. In sixth - eight grade 18 students out of 38 completed i-ready assessment. All 18 students tested below grade level. If not previously addressed, identify the two to three most significant ways that the LEA will increase or improve services for low-income students, English learners, and foster youth. Increased or Improved services We have made significant strides in providing access to technology. Every student in K-11th grade will be assigned a Chromebook to use. In addition to access to technology, PACE staff will continue to provide outstanding professional development in how to use technology as a learning tool. Students who may not be exposed to technology at home will have ready access. In addition, students were be provided with a variety of extended day intervention opportunities to help them develop their academic skills. PACE offered tutoring three days a week for one hour. Students who qualify for transportation will be provided transportation home. Many of our students are in need of additional support for social and emotional needs. PACE hired a counselor to serve PACE students. Counselors are instrumental in helping meet the needs of students. Counselors help support students and they help connect students and their families to outside resources. Budget Summary Complete the table below. LEAs may include additional information or more detail, including graphics. Page 3 of 79

DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Total General Fund Budget For LCAP Year $1,149,598 Total Funds Budgeted for Planned to Meet The Goals in the LCAP for LCAP Year $957,541.00 The LCAP is intended to be a comprehensive planning tool but may not describe all General Fund Budget. Briefly describe any of the General Fund Budget specified above for the LCAP year not included in the LCAP. The Charter School Fund accounts for the revenues and expenses for the general operations to operate the charter school. The focus of the charter school is educating children, preparing students to think critically; and empowering every child, every day to create a better world. The LCAP contains a series of goals and supporting actions and services specifically targeted and monitored to increase student achievement for at-risk and general students. The major items listed in the LCAP include providing a teacher workforce, teacher staff development, supporting curriculum, counseling program, and general plant and facilities maintenance. Additionally, the Charter School Fund budget includes expenditures for multiple support functions not specifically listed in the LCAP. These support functions include: + Instruction - including certificated and classified support, special education programs, outside service provider costs, speech pathologists, and psychologists; + Instruction Related Services - certificated and classified support, instructional aide support, office secretarial, attendance, clerical support, and site administration; + Pupil Services - Psychologists and related, nursing services, supplies and related, speech pathologists and related, transportation services; + Ancillary Services - Afterschool program aides, administration, supplies and related, and school sponsored athletics; + General Administration - District administration, secretarial, payroll, purchasing, and clerical support, audit services, data processing services, equipment and related, other general administration; + Plant Services - Facilities and grounds maintenance, cleaning and support services, supplies, contracts and related, security related services and contracts. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Total Projected LCFF Revenues for LCAP Year $801,464 Page 4 of 79

Annual Update LCAP Year Reviewed: 2017-18 Complete a copy of the following table for each of the LEA s goals from the prior year LCAP. Duplicate the table as needed. Goal 1 1. All students will receive high quality instruction in order to ensure proficiency on current academic standards. State and/or Local Priorities addressed by this goal: State Priorities: Priority 1: Basic (Conditions of Learning) Priority 2: State Standards (Conditions of Learning) Priority 3: Parental Involvement (Engagement) Priority 4: Pupil Achievement (Pupil Outcomes) Priority 5: Pupil Engagement (Engagement) Priority 6: School Climate (Engagement) Priority 7: Course Access (Conditions of Learning) Priority 8: Other Pupil Outcomes (Pupil Outcomes) Local Priorities: Annual Measurable Outcomes Expected Metric/Indicator CASSPP Data 17-18 Achieve a 5% increase in percentage of students meeting grade level standards or above on CAASPP Actual The goal was to increase the percentage of students meeting grade-level standards on CASSPP by 5% in ELA and Math. PACE did not meet that goal. PACE decreased the percentage of students meeting grade-level standards by 11.9% in ELA. PACE decreased percent of students meeting grade level standard in math by 11.2%. Baseline CAASPP Data: ELA 21.7 % of students meeting grade level standards; Math 15.8% of students meeting grade level standards Page 5 of 79

Metric/Indicator FIT Report, School Surveys Expected 17-18 Facilities will be well maintained by grounds, maintenance, and custodial staff as measured by monthly inspections, FIT reports, feedback and school surveys of parents, students and staff. (Priority 1) Actual Completed regular FIT reports. When parents were asked on the 2017-2018 Parent Survey if the school sites were well maintained over 80% of parents responded that school sites were well maintained. When you add the parents who stated that school sites were well maintained most of the time, the percentage of parents responding positive rose to over 90%. Baseline Monthly sites inspections and FIT reports will be evaluated to determine facilities and grounds are well maintained. School surveys will be used as an evaluation tool to determine how parents, students and staff feel about how well facilities and grounds are being maintained. Metric/Indicator California Credential Verification 17-18 Maintain that students are taught by teachers fully credentialed in subject areas in which they are teaching and certified as required. (Priority 1,4) Baseline 100% staff are fully credentialed in the subject areas in which they are teaching. We maintained fully credentialed teachers in all of our classrooms. Metric/Indicator Textbook Audit 17-18 Student access to CCSS aligned curriculum (CPM Math, Everyday Math, Study Sync, Ready Reading and Writing, iready) Pilot History curriculum during 2018-2019. All students have access to CCSS aligned curriculum math and language arts (CPM Math, Everyday Math, Study Sync, Ready Reading and Writing, iready, Kim Sutton CC math kits...). Students have access to a variety of curriculum to support NGSS. K-8 teachers participated in exploring Social Science curriculum and teachers will pilot two Social Science curriculums during the 2018-2019 school year. Baseline K-9 students have access to CCSS aligned curriculum in Math and ELA. Students need access to new History and Science curriculum 17-18 Page 6 of 79

Expected Actual Baseline Actions / Services Duplicate the from the prior year LCAP and complete a copy of the following table for each. Duplicate the table as needed. startcollapse Action 1 Planned Teachers will collaborate after school ten times a year for one hour giving time to teachers to learn instructional strategies necessary for mastery of California Standards. Money to pay teachers to score California Standards performance tasks 3 times per year. Giving teachers the opportunity to collaborate on student learning. Teachers will be given the opportunity to review student assessment data three times during the school year. Teachers will review CAASPP data, iready data, and AIMSweb assessment data. Money to pay teachers to participate in Districtwide Curriculum Committee in order collaborate on CCSS curriculum implementation. Increase professional development to provide staff Actual PACE teachers participated in ten additional hours of after school collaboration during the 2017-2018 school year. Teachers were provided the opportunity to be paid to score performance tasks three times during the 2017-2018 school year. During student assessment meetings, teachers reviewed CAASPP data, iready data, and AIMSweb data. After reviewing data, schools used the data to determine how to best support students in the classroom and in intervention groups. Budgeted $6,300 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Certificated staff and sub costs and associated benefits Estimated Actual $6,496 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Page 7 of 79

opportunity to participate in professional development on trauma-informed practices, Love and Logic training, and behavior management strategies for students. Action 2 Planned Maintain sufficient appropriately certificated teacher and admin workforce to deliver the educational program responsive to enrollment. Teachers of the school district are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject areas and for the pupils they are teaching. Ensure students are taught by teachers fully credentialed in subject areas in which they are teaching and certified as required. Actual Maintained sufficient appropriately certificated teacher and admin workforce to deliver the educational program with courses that meet the Broad Course of Study requirements. Teachers were appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject areas and for the pupils they taught. We ensured students were taught by teachers fully credentialed in subject areas in which they are teaching and certified as required. Budgeted $544,300 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Base 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Teacher salaries and benefits - Function 1, 2700, Object 1000,3000, Resource:0000 Estimated Actual $479,141 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Base 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Teacher salaries and benefits - Function 1, 2700, Object 1000,3000, Resource:0000 Action 3 Planned Continued support for District adopted California Standards aligned math textbooks. Reading and Writing Ready materials. Provide ongoing training for CPM and Everyday Math and newly adopted StudySync for 6th-8th Actual Continued to support District adopted California Standards aligned math textbooks as well as Reading and Writing Ready materials. Provided ongoing training for CPM and Everyday Math and newly adopted Study Sync for 6th-8th grade ELA $15,000 Page 8 of 79 Budgeted 5700-5799: Transfers Of Direct Costs Base 4000-4999: Books And Supplies Consumables and History adoption Estimated Actual $8,108 5700-5799: Transfers Of Direct Costs Base 4000-4999: Books And Supplies Consumables and History adoption

grade ELA program to meet the needs of 6th-8th grade students. program to meet the needs of 6th- 8th grade students. 2 teachers attended the Social Science adoption workshops sponsored by Shasta County Office of Education. Two curriculum programs were selected to pilot during the 2018-2019 school year. Action 4 Planned Facilities will be maintained by grounds, maintenance, and custodial staffing. Site inspections performed monthly, deficiencies reported for corrective action. Annual reporting of facility condition in SARC. Actual Facilities were maintained by grounds, maintenance, and custodial staff. Site inspections were performed monthly, parents, students and staff were surveyed to get feedback on how these groups felt schools were being maintained. Budgeted Included in cost transfer for operational support from EESD - 5710 5700-5799: Transfers Of Direct Costs Base Estimated Actual $62,027 5700-5799: Transfers Of Direct Costs Base Included in cost transfer for operational support from EESD - 5750 Action 5 Planned Provide instructional technology coaching by contracting with the 3 EESD certificated coaches to provide staff development and training for teachers and students. Focus is to use technology as a learning tool and to prepare our students Actual EESD instructional technology coaches provided ongoing training forpace staff. Purchased replacement technology. Technology was approriately maintained and purchased. Page 9 of 79 Budgeted $12,000 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Continue certificated coaching & benefits - costs shared with EESD $800 4000-4999: Books And Supplies Supplemental and Estimated Actual $12,000 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Continue certificated coaching & benefits - costs shared with EESD $1,000 4000-4999: Books And Supplies Supplemental and

for 21st century learning and mastery of California Standards. Maintain funding for technology curriculum purchases to support instruction. Purchase replacement technology assets. Maintain classified support staff to support technology assets. Concentration Continue technology curriculum software purchases - costs shared with EESD $1,000 2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Continue classified support and benefits - costs shared with EESD $6.500 4000-4999: Books And Supplies Supplemental and Concentration Continue technology replacements - costs shared with EESD Concentration Continue technology curriculum software purchases - costs shared with EESD $1,100 2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Continue classified support and benefits - costs shared with EESD $7,000 4000-4999: Books And Supplies Supplemental and Concentration Continue technology replacements - costs shared with EESD Action 6 Planned READY! for Kindergarten parent education, focused on parents of children ages 0-5, three times per year so that our students enter kindergarten ready for success in school. Continue to purchase READY! for Kindergarten supplies. Actual Provided READY! for Kindergarten parent education classes, focused on parents of children ages 0-5, three times during the school. Purchased READY! for Kindergarten supplies. Budgeted No separate associated cost - made available to PACE parents by EESD Estimated Actual No separate associated cost - made available to PACE parents by EESD Action 7 Planned EESD will monitor the EL needs of the district. Provide services for our EL families which will allow for Actual Provided EL services for our EL families which allowed for interpreting services, liaison services between home and school, training for EL aides. Budgeted No separate associated cost. Services made available by EESD; Included in cost transfer for operational support from Estimated Actual No separate associated cost. Services made available by EESD; Included in cost transfer for operational support from Page 10 of 79

interpreting services, liaison services between home and school, training for EL aides. Maintain funding for direct services to EL students for intervention and tutoring, all designed to increase student achievement. EESD - 5710 5700-5799: Transfers Of Direct Costs EESD - 5750 5700-5799: Transfers Of Direct Costs Action 8 Base Analysis Complete a copy of the following table for each of the LEA s goals from the prior year LCAP. Duplicate the table as needed. Use actual annual measurable outcome data, including performance data from the LCFF Evaluation Rubrics, as applicable. Describe the overall implementation of the actions/services to achieve the articulated goal. A majority of the actions and services were fully implemented as planned with a limited number of the actions and services were partially implemented. We were only able to offer a limited amount of summer learning. We would have like to have more parents attend our Ready! for K classes. We will continue this service. We are looking for creative ways to get parents to attend. Describe the overall effectiveness of the actions/services to achieve the articulated goal as measured by the LEA. The actions and services were not as effective as we would have liked to meet the learning goal as indicated by the assessment results. We were disappointed we declined on ELA and Math on CAASPP. Explain material differences between Budgeted and Estimated Actual. Collaboration - we allowed more collaboration time than originally planned. Extended day interventions were not used by students as much as we hoped and costs were less. Instructional technology coaches worked additional hours to develop curriculum (Dream STEAM kits), Chromebook purchases were less than expected, and instructional software programs selected were expanded beyond initial plans. Ready for K participation was less than anticipated. Page 11 of 79

Describe any changes made to this goal, expected outcomes, metrics, or actions and services to achieve this goal as a result of this analysis and analysis of the LCFF Evaluation Rubrics, as applicable. Identify where those changes can be found in the LCAP. We did not meet our learning goal in Math or ELA to increase student learning as measured by CAASPP. We will continue to enhance our MTSS system and we focus professional development on differentiated instruction. Page 12 of 79

Annual Update LCAP Year Reviewed: 2017-18 Complete a copy of the following table for each of the LEA s goals from the prior year LCAP. Duplicate the table as needed. Goal 2 Staff and students will have access to rigorous and relevant learning tools, resources, and professional development in order to ensure student learning. State and/or Local Priorities addressed by this goal: State Priorities: Priority 2: State Standards (Conditions of Learning) Priority 4: Pupil Achievement (Pupil Outcomes) Priority 6: School Climate (Engagement) Priority 7: Course Access (Conditions of Learning) Local Priorities: Annual Measurable Outcomes Expected Actual Metric/Indicator CASSPP Data 17-18 Increase student achievement as measured by CASSP by providing opportunity for teachers to collaborate 10 times per year for one hour after school. (Priority 1,2) Baseline CAASPP Data: ELA 13% of students meeting grade level standards; Math 4% of students meeting grade level standards Actions / Services Duplicate the from the prior year LCAP and complete a copy of the following table for each. Duplicate the table as needed. startcollapse Page 13 of 79

Action 1 Planned Actual Collaboration, See Goal 1 Action 1. Collaboration, See Goal 1 Action 1. Action 2 Planned Pay for three days of the master calendar to provide staff development focused on the needs of LI, FY, and EL students. Actual Provided three days of certificated teacher staff development. Budgeted Estimated Actual See Goal 1 Action 1 See Goal 1 Action 1 Budgeted No separate associated cost - Included in teacher salaries and benefits - See goal 1 Action 1 Estimated Actual $10,091 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Action 3 Planned Teachers will to be trained in new ELA/ELD Content Standards. Increase support provided to EL students. Action 4 Actual Maintained one family advocate to support EL students and their families. Three EESD staff members were trained in new ELPAC assessment. Staff members provided EL assessment service to PACE. Budgeted No separate associated cost Estimated Actual No separate associated cost Planned All teachers will have access, use, and more fully understand ELA/ELD Framework for the CCSS and use the Framework to meet the needs of EL students. Actual ELA/ELD Frameworks were available to all teachers. We need to continue to provide professional development on ELA/ELD Framework. Budgeted No separate associated cost Estimated Actual No separate associated cost Page 14 of 79

Action 5 Planned District will fund staff development so teachers and classifieds staff will receive Professional Development in how to deal with students who are suffering from trauma or struggling with social, emotional and behavior issues. Actual All certificated staff attended Capturing Kids' Heart Recharge training. Certificated staff received training in Restorative Justice practices. Several professional development sessions on implementation of Second Step were provided throughout the year. A variety of professional development sessions on how to best support students suffering from trauma or struggling with social, emotional and behavior issues were provided throughout the year. Budgeted No separate associated cost - will collaborate with EESD staff development Estimated Actual No separate associated cost - will collaborate with EESD staff development Analysis Complete a copy of the following table for each of the LEA s goals from the prior year LCAP. Duplicate the table as needed. Use actual annual measurable outcome data, including performance data from the LCFF Evaluation Rubrics, as applicable. Describe the overall implementation of the actions/services to achieve the articulated goal. Actions and Services for this goal were generally implemented as planned with very few exceptions due to the number of staff development choices made available to staff. All K-5 staff received staff development on DREAM Steam Kits and NGSS standards. There continues to be a need to provide additional staff development on the ELA/ELD framework. All staff attended professional development on trauma informed practices, Capturing Kids' Heart Recharge. 6th-8th grade Language Arts teachers received professional development on Study Sync ELA curriculum. Describe the overall effectiveness of the actions/services to achieve the articulated goal as measured by the LEA. The actions and services were effective at meeting the goal as indicated by participation in professional development. All certificated staff, and over 80% classified staff, participated in ongoing professional development opportunities. All certificated staff participated in Capturing Kids' Heart and Capturing Kids' Heart Recharge training. Restorative Practices training was provided for both classified staff and all 1st and 2nd year teachers. 6th-8th grade teachers piloted two Social Studies curriculum. Certificated staff were offered a variety of after school professional development sessions to choose from each month All sessions were focused on improving student learning by utilizing technology, behavior management, NGSS standards, and STEAM. Page 15 of 79

Explain material differences between Budgeted and Estimated Actual. Scope of training for trauma informed practices was reduced. Describe any changes made to this goal, expected outcomes, metrics, or actions and services to achieve this goal as a result of this analysis and analysis of the LCFF Evaluation Rubrics, as applicable. Identify where those changes can be found in the LCAP. Page 16 of 79

Annual Update LCAP Year Reviewed: 2017-18 Complete a copy of the following table for each of the LEA s goals from the prior year LCAP. Duplicate the table as needed. Goal 3 All schools will cultivate a positive school culture and systems of supports for staff and student personal, social, emotional and academic growth. State and/or Local Priorities addressed by this goal: State Priorities: Priority 1: Basic (Conditions of Learning) Priority 3: Parental Involvement (Engagement) Priority 4: Pupil Achievement (Pupil Outcomes) Priority 5: Pupil Engagement (Engagement) Priority 6: School Climate (Engagement) Local Priorities: Annual Measurable Outcomes Expected Metric/Indicator Class Size Average in K-3 17-18 Maintain student to teacher ratio in classes to increase service and opportunities for students and families. (Priority 5,6) Actual PACE maintained the K-3 Grade Level Span Class size ratio. Baseline First Year - Will collect data in June, 2018 Baseline Page 17 of 79

Metric/Indicator Fencing Project Data Expected 17-18 Increase campus safety by completing fencing project at PACE. Baseline Gates and Fences not completed. Actual Fencing projects has been completed at PACE 17-18 Metric/Indicator Mentor Data 17-18 Support parent involvement and engagement by providing LI, FY, EL students support from parent liaison. Baseline First Year - Will collect mentor data in June, 2018 Metric/Indicator Professional Development Data 17-18 Train 5 certificated staff trained in Capturing Kid's Hearts by 5 staff members. Training will be verified by the number of certificated staff attending Capturing Kid's Heart. Baseline Certificated staff not trained in Capturing Kids' Heart Parent Liaison helped to coordinate mentors that served students atpace. Increased the number of mentors by over 5%. Parent Liaison helped coordinate family dinners at Open House and Back To School Night. Trained 5 staff members in Capturing Kid's Heart. 17-18 Actions / Services Duplicate the from the prior year LCAP and complete a copy of the following table for each. Duplicate the table as needed. startcollapse Action 1 Planned Actual Budgeted Estimated Actual Page 18 of 79

Due to the unique needs of many of our students, class sizes lower than State GSA program are inherent in the staffing and class loading of our program. We focus on and hire teachers focusing on parent support, engagement, and connections in all grades, including K-3. Consideration also given to LI, EL, and FY populations. Maintained class sizes lower than the State GSA requirements. Refer to Certificated salaries & benefits; see Goal 1 Action 2 Refer to Certificated salaries & benefits; see Goal 1 Action 2 Action 2 Planned We will provide counseling services to increase school connectedness and support students in their need to be safe and socially/emotionally secure at school. Actual Maintained counseling services. We collected parent, student and staff surveys to determine how stakeholders are feeling about school safety and school connectedness. Budgeted No separate cost - support provided under cost transfer from EESD - 5710 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Estimated Actual No separate cost - support provided under cost transfer from EESD - 5750 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Action 3 Planned Each site will receive funding to maintain the additional club/activity focused on highachieving students. Actual Maintained additional funding for club/activities for high achieving students. We added 3 new clubs. Budgeted $3,700 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Continue support - Funding for extra duty stipends; certificated salaries & benefits Estimated Actual $0 1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Action 4 Planned Actual Budgeted Estimated Actual Page 19 of 79

Continue the support to families provided by our community liaison consultant. Obtain via contract for services. Continue to collect parent input on School Parent Surveys. Maintained community liaison contract services. No separate cost - support provided under cost transfer from EESD - 5710 No separate cost - support provided under cost transfer from EESD - 5750 Action 5 Planned Train 5 certificated staff in Capturing Kid's Heart and 6 certificated staff in Capturing Kids' Hearts Recharge Actual Trained 5 certificated staff in Capturing Kids' Heart. Trained all of the certificated staff in Capturing Kid's Heart Recharge. Budgeted No separate associated cost - will collaborate with EESD staff development Estimated Actual No separate associated cost - will collaborate with EESD staff development Action 6 Planned Provide intensive instructional and behavior aide program within the classrooms. Actual Maintained behavior aide program. Budgeted $44,500 2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Provide classroom instructional and behavior management support - Classified salaries & benefits Estimated Actual $34,970 2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries Supplemental and Concentration Provide classroom instructional and behavior management support - Classified salaries & benefits $137,500 2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries Base Provide classroom instructional and behavior management support - Classified salaries & benefits $119,869 2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries Base Provide classroom instructional and behavior management support - Classified salaries & benefits Action 7 Planned Actual Budgeted Estimated Actual Page 20 of 79

Continue to partner with Redding Police Department to provide a full tome SRO for the District. Hired a full time School Resource Officer to support all EESD schools. PACE contracted with EESD to provide Resource Officer support to PACE. $25,000 5000-5999: Services And Other Operating Base Contracted service with RPD - cost share with EESD No separate cost - support provided under cost transfer from EESD - 5750 5000-5999: Services And Other Operating Action 8 Planned Transportation to school, home from school, and home from extended day tutoring is needed for EL, LI, and FY students so transportation is not a barrier to education. Actual Provided transportation to school and home from school, and home from extended day tutoring. Budgeted No separate cost - support provided under cost transfer from EESD - 5710 5700-5799: Transfers Of Direct Costs Estimated Actual No separate cost - support provided under cost transfer from EESD - 5750 5700-5799: Transfers Of Direct Costs Analysis Complete a copy of the following table for each of the LEA s goals from the prior year LCAP. Duplicate the table as needed. Use actual annual measurable outcome data, including performance data from the LCFF Evaluation Rubrics, as applicable. Describe the overall implementation of the actions/services to achieve the articulated goal. Actions and Services for this goal were fully implemented, Describe the overall effectiveness of the actions/services to achieve the articulated goal as measured by the LEA. The additional actions and services were effective in accomplishing this goal. We demonstrated a significant increase in the number of clubs, sports, and activities available. We were also able to increase the number of school activities offered to parents. Additional parents participated in Family Literacy Nights, Family Game Nights. We demonstrated an increase in the percentage of parents expressing that they liked the school their children attend. Over 5% increase in the percentage of parents stating that they like the school their child attends. We showed a small increase in school attendance. Page 21 of 79

Explain material differences between Budgeted and Estimated Actual. Counseling services cost more due to a one-time correction of a historical error. Support for high achievers increased as we increased the program. Training in Capturing Kids Hearts was expanded to include additional site support services and coaching. Transportation program costs increased after hiring a new bus driver. Describe any changes made to this goal, expected outcomes, metrics, or actions and services to achieve this goal as a result of this analysis and analysis of the LCFF Evaluation Rubrics, as applicable. Identify where those changes can be found in the LCAP. The input we received from stakeholder meetings and parent, teacher, and student surveys, indicate a need for additional counseling services. We will increase counseling services. There is a need to continue to support students who are having difficulty with behavior and social and emotional concerns. We know these concerns impact student learning. We will increase the level social, emotional and behavioral support we provide students. We will implement a Second Step curriculum for 6th-8th grade students. We will also increase the level of support at our middle schools in order to better support students' social, emotional and behavior needs. Page 22 of 79

Stakeholder Engagement LCAP Year: 2018-19 Involvement Process for LCAP and Annual Update How, when, and with whom did the LEA consult as part of the planning process for this LCAP/Annual Review and Analysis? During October of the 2017-2018 school year, school leadership teams reviewed School Site Plans and LCAP goals. LCAP goals were used to help guide school sites to develop site-specific school goals for their School Plan update. School sites used the LCAP goals to help them set site-specific goals. Throughout the year, school leadership teams review school goals. December-January of the 2017-2018 school year, parents, students, and staff were given the opportunity to participate in a survey in order to provide feedback on LCAP priorities and to provide input regarding programs for all students, with a special focus on LI, EL, and FY students. School survey results were used to help evaluate LCAP goals and the results were used to help provide input on updating LCAP goals. 2/13/18 Met with Cabinet to Discuss LCAP planning 2/14/18 Met with principals to discuss LCAP and to begin collecting their feedback and input on LCAP 3/6/18 Met with DLAC committee to gather input from parents of EL students. Discussed what was working well and what they saw as needs for the upcoming school year. 2/15/18 LCAP Consultation Meeting-Met with EETA and CSEA Union Leadership to review LCAP goals and to get input on 2017-2018 LCAP update. 2/21/18 EESD Stakeholder Meeting- Met with parents, administrators, union representatives, EESD Bargaining Unit members, District office personnel to share progress toward LCAP goals, as well as getting input for the revision of 2017-2018 LCAP update. 2/28/18 Met with principals to discuss LCAP goals and to gain their input on LCAP planning for the 2017-2018 LCAP update. During March and April schools discussed LCAP goals and revisions during School Site Council meetings. 3/21/16 Title I parent meeting to discuss Title 1 services and progress toward LCAP goals. We requested input for the 2018-2019 LCAP update. Page 23 of 79

3/21/18 EESD Stakeholder Meeting- Met with parents, administrators, union representatives, EESD Bargaining Unit members, District office personnel to share progress toward LCAP goals, as well as getting input for the revision of 2017-2018 LCAP update. 2/6/18-2/21/18 Met at school sites during ELAC meeting to gain feedback on LCAP and how to best serve EL student population. 5/23/18 First public hearing at EESD Board meeting regarding 2018-2019 LCAP update for community members, EESD Board members, and other stakeholders from the district 6/6/18 Second public hearing at EESD Board meeting regarding 2018-2019 LCAP update. Impact on LCAP and Annual Update How did these consultations impact the LCAP for the upcoming year? Due to the need for reducing expenditures in the LCAP, and after hearing stakeholder input regarding our goals and receiving new input regarding possible additions for the 2016-2017 year, we have changed the following in the EESD LCAP update: Due to feedback on the need for additional counseling services, we will add counselor services in 2018-19. We are continuing the funding for transportation out of LCAP dollars to ensure students can attend school and can attend after school tutoring.. We will add an SDC class to serve students in need of more intensive behavior supports. We will work with EESD to add additional collaboration time during the school day. We would like to offer minimum days every Monday in order to increase collaboration. We will increase staff development in strategies to improve student learning through differentiation. We will increase staff development in the implementation of ELD standards. We will add Second Step Curriculum to 6th-8th grade. We will continue to enhance our MTSS process. Page 24 of 79

Due to the need for reducing expenditures in LCAP, and after hearing stakeholder input regarding our goals and getting new input regarding possible additions for the 2016-2017 year, we have changed the following in the LCAP update: After evaluating the LCAP budget, the decision was made that we will not offer summer learning in summer of 2017 The ACE program was able to operate on the current budget. As a result, we will not provide additional financial support to ACE. We received very positive feedback from parents, students and teachers on the positive impact technology is having on instruction. We will added back one certificated instructional technology coach, increasing this department to 4 certificated teachers and one director. Teachers expressed concerns about being out of the classroom to frequently. We changed our current collaboration model. We added one hour collaboration sessions after school. Staff will collaborate after school for one hour ten times per school year. Staff expressed the desire to receive additional training in how to best meet the needs of students who are struggling with social, emotional and behavior issues. We will add professional development for staff to meet the needs of students who have suffered trauma and/or students who struggle with behavior issues. We received feedback from administration that the Read and Play program had poor attendance and it was difficult to find the needed space for Read N Play. As a result, we eliminated the Read N Play program staring July, 2017. Page 25 of 79

Goals, Actions, & Services Strategic Planning Details and Accountability Complete a copy of the following table for each of the LEA s goals. Duplicate the table as needed. (Select from New Goal, Modified Goal, or Unchanged Goal) New Goal Goal 1 1. All students will receive high quality instruction in order to ensure proficiency on current academic standards. State and/or Local Priorities addressed by this goal: State Priorities: Priority 1: Basic (Conditions of Learning) Priority 2: State Standards (Conditions of Learning) Priority 3: Parental Involvement (Engagement) Priority 4: Pupil Achievement (Pupil Outcomes) Priority 5: Pupil Engagement (Engagement) Priority 6: School Climate (Engagement) Priority 7: Course Access (Conditions of Learning) Priority 8: Other Pupil Outcomes (Pupil Outcomes) Local Priorities: Identified Need: Page 26 of 79

Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes Metrics/Indicators Baseline 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 CAASPP Data 2017 CAASPP Data: ELA 13% of students meeting grade level standards; Math 4% of students meeting grade level standards Achieve a 5% increase in percentage of students meeting grade level standards or above on CAASPP. Achieve a 5% increase in the percentage of students meeting gradelevel standards or above on CAASPP. Achieve a 5% increase in the percentage of students meeting gradelevel standards or above on CAASPP. i-ready Data Establish baseline from T2 i-ready Assessment Evaluate the number of 2nd-8th-grade students meeting or exceeding grade-level proficiency as measured by 2nd trimester iready Diagnostics in reading and math. Increase the number of 2nd-8th-grade students meeting or exceeding grade-level proficiency by 5% as measured by 2nd trimester iready Diagnostics in reading and math. Increase the number of 2nd-8th-grade students meeting or exceeding grade-level proficiency by 5% as measured by 2nd trimester iready Diagnostics in reading and math. FIT Reports and Surveys Monthly sites inspections and FIT reports will be evaluated to determine facilities and grounds are well maintained. School surveys will be used as an evaluation tool to determine how parents, students and staff feel about how well facilities and grounds are being maintained. Facilities will be well maintained by grounds, maintenance, and custodial staff as measured by monthly inspections, FIT reports, feedback and school surveys of parents, students and staff. (Priority 1) Facilities will be well maintained by grounds, maintenance, and custodial staff as measured by monthly inspections, FIT reports, feedback and school surveys of parents, students and staff. (Priority 1) Facilities will be well maintained by grounds, maintenance, and custodial staff as measured by monthly inspections, FIT reports, feedback and school surveys of parents, students and staff. (Priority 1) Credential Audit 100% staff are fully credentialed in the Maintain that students are taught by teachers fully credentialed in Maintain that are taught by teachers fully credentialed in subject Maintain that are taught by teachers fully credentialed in subject Page 27 of 79

Metrics/Indicators Baseline 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 subject areas in which they are teaching. subject areas in which they are teaching and certified as required. (Priority 1,4) areas in which they are teaching and certified as required. (Priority 1,4) areas in which they are teaching and certified as required. (Priority 1,4) Curriculum Audit K-12 students have access to CCSS aligned curriculum in Math and ELA. Students need access to new History and Science curriculum Student access to CCSS aligned curriculum (CPM Math, Everyday Math, Study Sync, Ready Reading and Writing, iready, Kim Sutton CC math kits...) Pilot History curriculum during 2017-2018. (Priority 2) Student access to CCSS aligned curriculum (CPM Math, Everyday Math, Study Sync, Ready Reading and Writing, iready, Kim Sutton CC math kits...) Adopt History curriculum during 2018-2019 (Priority 2) Student access to CCSS aligned curriculum (CPM Math, Everyday Math, Study Sync, Ready Reading and Writing, iready, Kim Sutton CC math kits...) (Priority 2) Planned Actions / Services Complete a copy of the following table for each of the LEA s. Duplicate the table, including Budgeted, as needed. startcollapse Action 1 For not included as contributing to meeting the Increased or Improved Services Requirement: (Select from All, Students with Disabilities, or Specific Student Groups) [Add Students to be Served selection here] (Select from All Schools, Specific Schools, and/or Specific Grade Spans) [Add Location(s) selection here] For included as contributing to meeting the Increased or Improved Services Requirement: OR (Select from English Learners, Foster Youth, and/or Low Income) Scope of Services: (Select from LEA-wide, Schoolwide, or Limited to Unduplicated Student Group(s)) (Select from All Schools, Specific Schools, and/or Specific Grade Spans) Page 28 of 79

English Learners Foster Youth Low Income for 2017-18 New Action LEA-wide for 2018-19 Unchanged Action All Schools for 2019-20 Unchanged Action 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Teachers will collaborate after school ten times a year for one hour giving time to teachers to learn instructional strategies necessary for mastery of California Standards. Money to pay teachers to score California Standards performance tasks 3 times per year. Giving teachers the opportunity to collaborate on student learning. Teachers will be given the opportunity to review student assessment data three times during the school year. Teachers will review CAASPP data, iready data, and AIMSweb assessment data. Money to pay teachers to participate in Districtwide Curriculum Committee in order collaborate on CCSS curriculum implementation. Increase professional development to provide staff opportunity to participate in professional development on trauma-informed practices, Love and Logic training, and behavior management strategies for students. Budgeted Teachers will collaborate after school ten times a year for one hour giving time to teachers to learn instructional strategies necessary for mastery of California Standards. Money to pay teachers to score California Standards performance tasks 3 times per year. Giving teachers the opportunity to collaborate on student learning. Teachers will be given the opportunity to review student assessment data three times during the school year. Teachers will review CAASPP data, iready data, and AIMSweb assessment data. Money to pay teachers to participate in Districtwide Curriculum Committee in order collaborate on CCSS curriculum implementation. Increase professional development to provide staff opportunity to participate in professional development on trauma-informed practices, Love and Logic training, and behavior management strategies for students. Teachers will collaborate after school ten times a year for one hour giving time to teachers to learn instructional strategies necessary for mastery of California Standards. Money to pay teachers to score California Standards performance tasks 3 times per year. Giving teachers the opportunity to collaborate on student learning. Teachers will be given the opportunity to review student assessment data three times during the school year. Teachers will review CAASPP data, iready data, and AIMSweb assessment data. Money to pay teachers to participate in Districtwide Curriculum Committee in order collaborate on CCSS curriculum implementation. Increase professional development to provide staff opportunity to participate in professional development on trauma-informed practices, Love and Logic training, and behavior management strategies for students. Page 29 of 79