DEVELOPING AN IN-HOUSE PLACEMENT ASSESSMENT

Similar documents
5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Epping Elementary School Plan for Writing Instruction Fourth Grade

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

End-of-Module Assessment Task K 2

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

Large Kindergarten Centers Icons

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

Project Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Create A City: An Urban Planning Exercise Students learn the process of planning a community, while reinforcing their writing and speaking skills.

Standards-Based Bulletin Boards. Tuesday, January 17, 2012 Principals Meeting

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Ohio s Learning Standards-Clear Learning Targets

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

Mercer County Schools

Number of Items and Test Administration Times IDEA English Language Proficiency Tests/ North Carolina Testing Program.

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

English as a Second Language Unpacked Content

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

End-of-Module Assessment Task

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Unit Lesson Plan: Native Americans 4th grade (SS and ELA)

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Extraordinary Eggs (Life Cycle of Animals)

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

West s Paralegal Today The Legal Team at Work Third Edition

Sample from: 'State Studies' Product code: STP550 The entire product is available for purchase at STORYPATH.

(I couldn t find a Smartie Book) NEW Grade 5/6 Mathematics: (Number, Statistics and Probability) Title Smartie Mathematics

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

Pentomino Problem. Use the 3 pentominos that are provided to make as many different shapes with 12 sides or less. Use the following 3 shapes:

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Senior Stenographer / Senior Typist Series (including equivalent Secretary titles)

RESPONSE TO LITERATURE

LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

Mathematics Success Level E

INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS DOCUMENT Grade 5/Science

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Plainfield Public School District Reading/3 rd Grade Curriculum Guide. Modifications/ Extensions (How will I differentiate?)

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Textbook Chapter Analysis this is an ungraded assignment, however a reflection of the task is part of your journal

Tears. Measurement - Capacity Make A Rhyme. Draw and Write. Life Science *Sign in. Notebooks OBJ: To introduce capacity, *Pledge of

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

EVERY PICTURE TELLS A STORY

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

Welcome to ACT Brain Boot Camp

Richardson, J., The Next Step in Guided Writing, Ohio Literacy Conference, 2010

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

DRA Correlated to Connecticut English Language Arts Curriculum Standards Grade-Level Expectations Grade 4

Intermediate Algebra

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Lucy Caulkins Writing Rubrics

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

AGS THE GREAT REVIEW GAME FOR PRE-ALGEBRA (CD) CORRELATED TO CALIFORNIA CONTENT STANDARDS

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

Interpreting ACER Test Results

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Mathematics Levels 12 14

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

TA Script of Student Test Directions

South Carolina English Language Arts

Grade 7. Prentice Hall. Literature, The Penguin Edition, Grade Oregon English/Language Arts Grade-Level Standards. Grade 7

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

Using SAM Central With iread

OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma

BPS Information and Digital Literacy Goals

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Increasing Student Engagement

November 2012 MUET (800)

eguidelines Aligned to the Common Core Standards

Topic 3: Roman Religion

Kristin Moser. Sherry Woosley, Ph.D. University of Northern Iowa EBI

FEEDBACK & MARKING POLICY. Little Digmoor Primary School

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Curriculum and Assessment Guide (CAG) Elementary California Treasures First Grade

SCISA HIGH SCHOOL REGIONAL ACADEMIC QUIZ BOWL

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

CAFE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS O S E P P C E A. 1 Framework 2 CAFE Menu. 3 Classroom Design 4 Materials 5 Record Keeping

Reading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!

Transcription:

DEVELOPING AN IN-HOUSE PLACEMENT ASSESSMENT Placement assessments are a key factor in the success of a program. They allow programs to: determine learners English language and literacy proficiency assess learners content knowledge distinguish between learners who are part of the intended target audience and those who are not group learners in classes by ability The most effective placement tools are tailored to the program they are designed for, incorporating the context, vocabulary and level of language appropriate to the program. The purpose of this tool is to guide ESL literacy program providers in developing an effective inhouse placement tool. This tool can by used by: ESL literacy program administrators ESL literacy curriculum designers There are five parts to this tool: an overview guidelines for oral interviews guidelines for an oral reading component guidelines for a reading and writing component implementation considerations 1

Overview An in-house placement assessment or placement component to accompany a standardized assessment provides specific information to enhance program effectiveness. When designing such a tool, give careful consideration to the findings from your learner and community needs assessments (see Stage 1: Understand Needs in the ESL Literacy Curriculum Framework). Ensure that the placement tool aligns with the program purpose and assesses learners in the areas that the program will focus on. Questions that focus on aspects of the learner profile, such as years of education, background, goals and prior training should be included to assess whether or not learners are part of the target audience. Questions that identify literacy skills and content knowledge will help you effectively place learners in program levels. When you design your in-house placement assessment, consider including the following: an oral interview an oral reading component a reading and writing assessment section a marking tool that relates directly to program levels Guidelines for Oral Interviews The oral interview helps to identify participants for the program by assessing oral ability and determining background and prior learning experiences. Questions in an oral interview that focus on specific program-related information help to ensure a good match between program and learner. For example, in a family literacy program, questions may gather information about how many children the learner has and their ages; for a specific workplace program, questions may focus on prior training, certificates received and work experience outside of Canada. An oral interview can also include tasks that help determine literacy in first language, such as responding to the prompts: Can you write your first name for me in your language? Please write the numbers 1-10 in your language. If it is possible, first language oral interpreters should be present for the oral interview to ensure understanding and to gather detailed information. Guidelines for an Oral Reading Component The oral reading component helps to determine awareness of print without requiring the learners to read instructions or write. Learners are asked to identify items, pictures, letters and then words in a one-on-one setting. The assessment should begin with concrete examples that learners are familiar with such as labels or signs that learners are likely to have already encountered in daily life (e.g. a Coke can, a no smoking sign). After concrete, hands-on manipulatives, use photos or diagrams and then move on to print materials. Reading tasks should get progressively more challenging to test a range of ESL literacy phases. Instructions should be given orally and demonstrated. Adjust the phrasing of the instructions if they are not understood. 2

Sample oral interview question sheet Name: Date: Note to assessor: This portion of the placement assessment focuses on gathering background information, not on assessing English language ability. Give the learners any necessary prompts to help them understand the questions. Rephrase the questions and model as necessary. Note answers and observations under comments. You can have the learners write their response to numbers 9 and 10 on the back of this sheet. Question: Comments: What is your name? Where are you from? When did you come to Canada? Did you go to school in your country? How many years did you go to school in your country? How old were you when you stopped going to school? What job do you want to do in Canada? What language(s) do you speak? Can you write your name for me in your language? Can you write the numbers 1 to 10 for me in your language? Did you go to another school in Canada? (If so, where? For how long?) 3

Guidelines for an Oral Reading Component The oral reading component helps to determine awareness of print without requiring the learners to read instructions or write. Learners are asked to identify items, pictures, letters and then words in a one-on-one setting. The assessment should begin with concrete examples that learners are familiar with such as labels or signs that learners are likely to have already encountered in daily life (e.g. a Coke can, a no smoking sign). After concrete, hands-on manipulatives, use photos or diagrams and then move on to print materials. Reading tasks should get progressively more challenging to test a range of ESL literacy phases. Instructions should be given orally and demonstrated. Adjust the phrasing of the instructions if they are not understood. The following link to a video, provided by Literacywork International, illustrates a reading demonstration that focuses on concrete, relevant materials. http://www.literacywork.com/literacywork/videos/ Entries/2010/5/23_The_Reading_Demonstration.html Examples of skills to focus on in an oral reading component are: Can the learner identify common symbols on objects that he/she is likely to encounter in daily life? o e.g. What is this? Show the learner a Coke can. Can the learner identify one shape in a group of three? o e.g. Point to the circle. Show a picture with a circle, square and triangle on it. Can the learner count the number of objects in a picture (up to five)? o e.g. How many? Show a picture with four of the same object such as a pencil. Can the learner identify certain letters in the alphabet? o e.g. Point to the B. Point to the S. Show the learner the alphabet in large print. Can the learner identify his/her own name in a list? o e.g. Show me your name. Show the learner a list with three to five names, including their own. Can the learner read basic sight words? o e.g. What does this say? Point to a word in a list of basic sight words in large print. Can the learner read a short paragraph? o e.g. Can you read this? Show the learner a short paragraph. Watch for the ability to decode words. 4

Can the learner understand what he/she reads in the paragraph? o e.g. What was the story about? Ask particular questions related to the story to determine comprehension. Can the learner read words or text specific to the focus of your program? o e.g. Can you read this? Show the learner words and then a short text. Guidelines for a Reading and Writing Component The reading and writing component of a placement assessment helps to assess learners abilities in English literacy. Assessment tasks in reading and writing should progress across the benchmark levels of a program. Provide tasks that increase in complexity as learners progress through the assessment, in order to give all learners a chance to demonstrate what they know. Questions at the higher levels will involve reading for meaning and information as opposed to decoding. When designing the reading and writing tasks, ensure the focus is on identifying the reading skills and not background or cultural knowledge. Put the necessary supports in place so that learners can complete the task. Aim to use relevant vocabulary and content that most learners are familiar with. Process for creating a reading and writing assessment 1. Determine the range of levels in your program. 2. Identify the outcomes you will focus on in your program. 3. Include tasks that target the outcomes at each level, beginning with the lowest level and progressing to the highest. Ensure that there is a balance of tasks from each level. 4. Determine the type and amount of support to be given with each task. 5. Create instructions for each task, stating the criteria for each task and including visuals when appropriate. 6. Determine the scores for each task and total score for assessment. 7. Design your marking tool. 8. Train the assessment administrators for consistency of marking. Sample reading and writing tasks that relate to outcomes at Foundation Phase identify same/different shapes by circling or crossing out match similar letters, shapes or pictures copy letters or simple words directly beside an example 5

Sample reading and writing tasks that relate to outcomes at Phase I copy simple sentences fill in basic personal information match basic words to pictures identify specific words in a short text complete short sentence stems Sample reading and writing tasks that relate to outcomes at Phase II read a short basic text and respond to questions with short answers select words to form a word box to complete simple sentences write simple sentences locate purpose and key information in short texts Sample reading and writing tasks that relate to outcomes at Phase III fill in authentic forms interpret and compare information from short texts, charts or graphs identify purpose and key information in longer texts infer meaning from texts produce a focused writing sample Marking tool A clear, standardized marking tool should accompany the placement assessment. Key things to consider and include are as follows: Clear indicators of the conditions for each task in the assessment should be detailed on the marking tool. Instructions detailing the assessment administrator s prompts for each question should be outlined and described clearly. ESL literacy classes will involve extensive support for the learner, so prompts are necessary in the assessment. Scores should be included for each task and for the assessment as a whole. The marking tool should relate scores to Phases or program levels for ease of placement. Clear explanations of how the score determines the learner s placement level should be provided. All assessment administrators should be trained in the assessment and marking tool to ensure consistency. 6

This sample provides a model for a marking tool, and differentiates abilities between Phases. In your program, it may be necessary to further differentiate within the Phases. Sample placement assessment marking tool Instructions: Mark each section according to the conditions and points listed. If the learner scores 8/10, then he/she has demonstrated the outcome for that level. If the learner scores 8/10 on both tasks for the level, then he/she is ready for the next level. Continue marking the sections until the scores are consistently below 8/10. Learner Name: Date: Section Conditions and points Score Conditions: Learner must circle only one object in the row ESL literacy Phase demonstrated A Points: 1 point for each correct object circled Foundation Conditions: Spelling must be copied accurately; letters should be B recognizable; Points: 1 point for each word copied correctly. Do no deduct for Foundation capitalization errors. Conditions: Learner must circle only one object in the line C Points: 1 point for each word placed correctly. ½ point for correct Phase I word used but copied incorrectly Conditions: Words must be recognizable. D Points: 1 point for each word used. Do not deduct points for Phase I spelling or messy letters Conditions: Learner must circle only one answer per line E Points: 1 point for each correct answer circled Phase II Conditions: Sentences must be related to the topic F Points: 2 points for each sentence written correctly. Deduct half a Phase II point for incorrect spelling or punctuation Conditions: All information must be accurate, legible and written G in the boxes Points: 1 point for each correct item included. No point if the Phase III item does not meet the conditions Conditions: Answers should be in complete sentences. Spelling H and punctuation should be correct Points: 1 point for each sentence. ½ point if the sentence Phase III includes spelling or punctuation errors Placement level: 7

Implementation Considerations There are several factors that can influence the successful implementation of your placement assessment. Consider the following: Time time content setting learners impressions resources Learners should be able to complete the placement assessment in a reasonable period of time. If the assessment has different sections, these may need to be completed at different times. If an assessment is too long, learners may be unable to complete the assessment or may not demonstrate their true abilities. Time also needs to be considered from a program point of view. Design a placement tool that is manageable in your particular context, incorporating as many of the above recommendations as possible. Content Move from concrete to abstract. Begin with real objects that connect to the learners lives before moving to more abstract reading and writing tasks such as a story about a fictional person. Tasks should include content that learners are likely to be familiar with. Relate the tasks on the placement tool directly to the type of program. In a workplace program, tasks should involve document use and reading schedules. An academic preparation test should focus more on identifying the main topic and supporting details in a text. Setting It is ideal if placement assessments can be done one-on-one. If this is not possible, they should be done in a non-threatening environment and tasks should be explained clearly, one at a time. Learners Impressions Stop the learners when they still feel successful so that the assessment is a positive experience. If a learner attempts a task that is too difficult, provide lots of prompts so the learner feels able to complete it, but do not mark it for the final score. Resources Consider the resources available in the program when designing the placement assessment. Only design the oral interview to include a first language interpreter if first language interpreters are accessible in all the languages likely to be represented. Include an oral reading component 8

if there is sufficient time, enough instructors and the space to do one-on-one assessments. Consider the resources available for marking when designing the length of the assessment. For a complete list of the works cited in this document and in Learning for LIFE: An ESL Literacy Curriculum Framework, please refer to: www.esl-literacy.com/workscited2 9