SB 174 Pilot Principal Survey Data from School Year Teacher Preparation Effectiveness Survey: First Year Teachers

Similar documents
u Articulation and Transfer Best Practices

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

A Comparison of the ERP Offerings of AACSB Accredited Universities Belonging to SAPUA

African American Success Initiative

Student Success Center & Writing Center Directory Region: South East, TX & Texas Gulf Coast

CURRENT POSITION: Angelo State University, San Angelo, Texas

Latino Males in Texas Community Colleges: A Phenomenological Study of Masculinity Constructs and their Effect on College Experiences

ED : Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts

ED487: Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts

Texas Libraries: Responding to the Needs of Job Seekers

Apply Texas. Tracking Student Progress

All Hands on Deck! Engaging Faculty Voices to Rise Above the Storm!

The Economic Impact of College Bowl Games

Matthew Taylor Morris, Ph.D.

Campus Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

CEREMONIALS/RECOGNITION OF SPECIAL GUESTS

SER CHANGES~ACCOMMODATIONS PAGES

DELIVERING A DEMAND LED SYSTEM IN THE U.S. THE ALAMO COMMUNITY COLLEGES APPROACH

LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST

Spring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview

New Jersey Department of Education

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Post-Master s Certificate in. Leadership for Higher Education

Service Learning Advisory Board Meeting October 25, 2016 East Campus, (2-4pm) Meeting: 3:05 pm

Professional Development Connected to Student Achievement in STEM Education

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

JAMALIN R. HARP. Adjunct, Texas Christian University, Department of History January 2016 May 2016 HIST 10603: United States Before 1877

CAROL HUNTER FAIRLIE 502 East Avenue I Alpine, Texas #(432)

MEMORANDUM. Leo Zuniga, Associate Vice Chancellor Communications

FY Matching Scholarship Grant Allocations by County Based on Free and Reduced Lunch (FRL) Population 1

Texas Bioscience Institute Educating Scientists For The Future. Nelda Howton

Price Sensitivity Analysis

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

David Erwin Ritter Associate Professor of Accounting MBA Coordinator Texas A&M University Central Texas

2007 NIRSA Salary Census Compiled by the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association NIRSA National Center, Corvallis, Oregon

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Texas Public Libraries:

SAN JACINTO COLLEGE JOB DESCRIPTION

CREATING A SEAMLESS PIPELINE INTO UNDERGRADUATE PRO- GRAMS IN STEM FIELDS THROUGH REGION-WIDE ARTICULATION AGREEMENTS

CURRICULUM VITA. JUAN MANUEL NIÑO, PhD

COURSE CATALOG & EDUCATIONAL PLANNING GUIDE SAN ANGELO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT LAKE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

Internship Program. Employer and Student Handbook

2017 Polk County City Election Polling Locations

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

VITAE G. TERRENCE CORIDEN WORKER S COMPENSATION

Program Report for the Preparation of Journalism Teachers

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

Reference Letter For A Substitute Teacher

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Work Stations 101: Grades K-5 NCTM Regional Conference &

Cynthia M. Stanley, Ph.D., LRT, CTRS

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Sul Ross State University Spring Syllabus for ED 6315 Design and Implementation of Curriculum

ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Discipline

Administrative Endorsements - Teacher Leader (PK-12) - Principal (PK-12) - Superintendent (PK-12) - Chief School Business Official (PK-12) - Director

Special Education Assessment Process for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students

Institutional Report. Fall 2013 CLA+ Cross-Sectional Results. Barton College. cla+

November 11, 2014 SCHOOL NAMING NEWS:

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT. Radiation Therapy Technology

TCC Jim Bolen Math Competition Rules and Facts. Rules:

New Mexico s Definition of a Highly Qualified Teacher August, 2005

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

College of Education Department of Educational Psychology SYLLABUS

Scholarship Application For current University, Community College or Transfer Students

Cy-Fair College Teacher Preparation and Certification Program Application Form

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

Catalog Supplement Pasco Yakima A Learning Site of Pasco

Glenn County Special Education Local Plan Area. SELPA Agreement

PUBLIC SCHOOL OPEN ENROLLMENT POLICY FOR INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL DISTRICT

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL. How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities

Nancy Guilloteau The University of Texas at Austin Department of French and Italian 201 W. 21st St. STOP B7600 Austin, Texas 78712

Special Education Program Continuum

Texas Healthcare & Bioscience Institute

Academic Intervention Services (Revised October 2013)

University of North Dakota

Institutional Report. Spring 2014 CLA+ Results. Barton College. cla+

DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT

State Parental Involvement Plan

Toward a Latino Attainment Agenda:

QUESTIONS and Answers from Chad Rice?

Meeting the Challenges of No Child Left Behind in U.S. Immersion Education

CURRICULUM VITAE Stephanie Capshaw, OTD, OTR (915) (cell) (915) (work)

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Basic Standards for Residency Training in Internal Medicine. American Osteopathic Association and American College of Osteopathic Internists

Dr. Eunice Lerma. The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Department of Counseling and Guidance (956)

Educational History. B. A., 1988, University Center at Tulsa, Sociology. Professional Experience. Principal Positions:

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS BUS 261 BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS. 3 Credit Hours. Prepared by: Cindy Rossi January 25, 2014

Transcription:

Handout 2a SB 174 Pilot Principal Survey Data from School Year 2010 2011 Teacher Preparation Effectiveness Survey: First Year Teachers Section I: Teacher Background 1. The name of this teacher s educator preparation program is (name provided) (**=fewer than 10) A Career in Education-ACP.1 14 A Career in Teaching-EPP (Humble).2 23 A Career in Teaching-EPP (McAllen).2 21 A Career in Teaching-EPP (Corpus Christi).3 30 A+ Texas Teachers 9.3 1082 A+ Texas Teachers (Austin) 1.4 157 A+ Texas Teachers (Bedford/Fort Worth) 1.3 146 A+ Texas Teachers (Dallas) 2.2 253 A+ Texas Teachers (San Antonio) 1.4 168 Abilene Christian University.4 46 ACT-Central Texas - Temple.3 35 ACT-Houston 1.8 206 ACT-Houston at Dallas 1.0 121 ACT-Rio Grande Valley.8 92 ACT-San Antonio (Alt Cert for Teachers) 1.2 135 Alamo Comm Coll Dist (Northwest Vista).1 ** Alamo Community College District.0 ** Alt-South Tx Ed Progm - Laredo (A-STEP).2 24 Alternative Cert for Tchrs NOW! (El Paso).1 16 Alternative-South Texas Educator Program.6 66 Angelo State University.7 78 ATC-East Houston.0 ** Austin College.1 15 Austin Community College.1 ** Baylor University.7 82 Blinn College.2 23 Brookhaven College.0 ** College of the Mainland COMPACT.1 11 Collin County Community College.3 33 Concordia University.1 12 Dallas Baptist University.2 20 4700 Mueller Blvd. Austin, TX 78723 800-476-6861 www.sedl.org txcc.sedl.org

Dallas Christian College.0 ** Dallas ISD 2.5 286 East Texas Baptist University.2 20 Education Career Alternatives Program 2.2 251 Educators of Excellence ACP.1 11 EIT: Excellence in Teaching.0 ** Hardin-Simmons University.3 32 Houston Baptist University.2 18 Houston Community College System.1 10 Houston ISD.8 88 Howard Payne University.2 27 Huston-Tillotson University.0 ** Intern Teacher ACP.0 ** IteachTEXAS 5.6 648 Jarvis Christian College.0 ** Lamar State College - Orange.4 43 Lamar University.5 54 Laredo Community College.1 ** LeTourneau University.4 48 Lone Star College - Cy-Fair.1 16 Lone Star College - Kingwood.5 53 Lone Star College - Montgomery.1 13 Lone Star College - North Harris.1 ** Lone Star College - Tomball.1 ** Lubbock Christian University.3 31 McLennan Community College.4 41 McMurry University.2 27 Midwestern State University.4 50 Mountain View College.0 ** Our Lady of the Lake University.2 20 Pasadena ISD.5 55 Paul Quinn College.0 ** Prairie View A&M University.2 23 Professional Teacher Certifications, LLC.0 ** Quality ACT: Alternative Certified Tchrs.6 72 Region 01 Education Service Center.8 93 Region 02 Education Service Center.2 25 Region 03 Education Service Center.2 24 Region 04 Education Service Center 2.8 322 Data compiled 1.11.12 by the TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CENTER at SEDL txcc.sedl.org 2

Region 05 Education Service Center.2 25 Region 06 Education Service Center.1 15 Region 07 Education Service Center.6 64 Region 10 Education Service Center 1.0 120 Region 11 Education Service Center.5 54 Region 12 Education Service Center.5 58 Region 13 Education Service Center.9 109 Region 14 Education Service Center.2 20 Region 18 Education Service Center.4 41 Region 19 Education Service Center.2 28 Region 20 Education Service Center.8 95 Rice University.0 ** Richland College.0 ** Sam Houston State University 2.2 257 San Antonio College Center for Ed Prep.0 ** San Jacinto College North.0 ** Schreiner University.1 ** South Texas College.1 11 South Texas Transition to Teaching ACP.4 47 Southern Methodist University.2 26 Southwestern Adventist University.1 ** Southwestern Assemblies of God Univ.1 ** Southwestern University.0 ** St Edward's University.1 15 St Mary's University.1 10 Stephen F Austin State University 2.0 237 Steps to Teaching - ACP.1 10 Sul Ross State University - Alpine.2 27 Sul Ross State University - Rio Grande.1 15 Tarleton State University 1.3 150 TeacherBuilder.com.6 73 Teachers for the 21st Century.1 14 Texas A&M International University.7 82 Texas A&M University 2.7 309 Texas A&M University - Commerce 2.1 241 Texas A&M University - Corpus Christie.8 91 Texas A&M University - Kingsville 1.1 130 Texas A&M University - San Antonio.0 ** Texas A&M University - Texarkana.4 49 Data compiled 1.11.12 by the TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CENTER at SEDL txcc.sedl.org 3

Texas Alternative Center for Teachers.1 16 Texas Alternative Cert Pgm @ Austin.0 ** Texas Alternative Cert Pgm @ Brownsville.1 15 Texas Alternative Cert Pgm @ Houston.0 ** Texas Alternative Certification Program.3 35 Texas Christian University.6 69 Texas College.0 ** Texas Lutheran University.2 18 Texas Southern University.1 11 Texas State University-San Marcos 3.5 406 Texas Teaching Fellows (Austin).6 65 Texas Teaching Fellows (Dallas).6 70 Texas Teaching Fellows (San Antonio).7 82 Texas Tech University 2.1 248 Texas Wesleyan University.2 26 Texas Woman's University 1.1 131 The TX Institute for Teacher Education.0 ** Training via E-Learning: An Alt Crt Hybr.1 12 Trinity University.2 19 Tyler Junior College.0 ** University of Houston 1.2 145 University of Houston-Clear Lake.8 95 University of Houston-Downtown.9 100 University of Houston-Victoria.6 73 University of Mary Hardin-Baylor.4 45 University of North Texas 2.8 325 University of St Thomas.0 ** University of Texas - Arlington 1.1 133 University of Texas - Austin 1.8 213 University of Texas - Brownsville 1.2 141 University of Texas - Dallas.4 48 University of Texas - El Paso 2.0 237 University of Texas - Pan American 1.3 148 University of Texas - Permian Basin.4 49 University of Texas - San Antonio 2.3 270 University of Texas - Tyler.8 98 University of the Incarnate Word.2 26 Wayland Baptist University.2 27 Weatherford College.1 ** Data compiled 1.11.12 by the TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CENTER at SEDL txcc.sedl.org 4

Web-Centric Alternative Cert Program.9 108 West Texas A&M University 1.9 223 Western Governors University.0 ** Wiley College.1 ** Yes Preparatory Public Schools.1 17 2. Was this beginning teacher employed in the certification area in which he/she was trained by the educator preparation program? Yes 99.9 11615 No.1 6 3. Did this beginning teacher teach at this campus for five or more months of the academic year? Yes 98.9 11621 No* 1.1 129 Total 100.0 11750 *If a beginning teacher taught less than 5 months at the campus, the principal did not complete the remainder of the survey. Survey Evaluation Rating When responding to questions 4-39 in this survey, please refer to the following descriptions: Evaluation Rating Well prepared Sufficiently prepared Not sufficiently prepared Not at all prepared Description All or almost all of the time, the beginning teacher was able to demonstrate a thorough understanding and had the required knowledge and skills. Most of the time, the beginning teacher was able to demonstrate a general understanding and had the required knowledge and skills. The beginning teacher demonstrated limited understanding and had partial required knowledge and skills. The beginning teacher demonstrated little to no understanding and had minimal required knowledge and skills. Data compiled 1.11.12 by the TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CENTER at SEDL txcc.sedl.org 5

Section II: Classroom Environment 4. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to effectively implement discipline-management procedures? Well prepared 34.8 4043 Sufficiently prepared 49.5 5755 Not sufficiently prepared 13.9 1612 Not at all prepared 1.8 211 5. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to communicate clear expectations for achievement and behavior that promote and encourage self-discipline and self-directed learning? Well prepared 38.1 4430 Sufficiently prepared 48.2 5607 Not sufficiently prepared 12.4 1436 Not at all prepared 1.3 148 6. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to provide support to achieve a positive, equitable, and engaging learning environment? Well prepared 45.6 5300 Sufficiently prepared 45.4 5279 Not sufficiently prepared 8.0 928 Not at all prepared 1.0 114 7. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to build and maintain positive rapport with students? Well prepared 52.4 6087 Sufficiently prepared 40.9 4758 Not sufficiently prepared 5.9 688 Not at all prepared.8 88 Data compiled 1.11.12 by the TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CENTER at SEDL txcc.sedl.org 6

8. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to build and maintain positive rapport and twoway communication with students families? Well prepared 42.8 4973 Sufficiently prepared 48.6 5650 Not sufficiently prepared 7.5 877 Not at all prepared 1.0 121 QUESTIONS 9 16 ARE RELATED TO INSTRUCTION. THE INSTRUCTION SECTION WAS PILOTED IN 2010 11. THE INSTRUCTION SECTION WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE 2012 RESULTS FOR REPORTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY. Section IV: Students with Disabilities 17 Does this teacher have students with disabilities in his/her classroom, as determined by the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 89.1001? A child is considered a student with disabilities if he or she has a physical, cognitive, behavioral or other related impairment. Yes 79.0 9182 No 21.0 2439 18. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to differentiate instruction to meet the academic needs of students with disabilities? Well prepared 29.3 2691 Sufficiently prepared 57.7 5297 Not sufficiently prepared 12.0 1105 Not at all prepared 1.0 89 Data compiled 1.11.12 by the TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CENTER at SEDL txcc.sedl.org 7

19. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to differentiate instruction to meet the behavioral needs of students with disabilities? Well prepared 28.2 2590 Sufficiently prepared 56.6 5198 Not sufficiently prepared 13.9 1280 Not at all prepared 1.2 114 20. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to provide appropriate ways for students with disabilities to demonstrate their learning? Well prepared 30.3 2781 Sufficiently prepared 58.2 5345 Not sufficiently prepared 10.6 971 Not at all prepared.9 85 21. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to understand and adhere to the federal and state laws that govern special education services? Well prepared 31.8 2917 Sufficiently prepared 59.8 5494 Not sufficiently prepared 7.6 695 Not at all prepared.8 76 22. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to make appropriate decisions (e.g., when and how to make accommodations and/or modifications to instruction, assessment, materials, delivery, and classroom procedures) to meet the learning needs of students who have an Individualized Education Program (IEP)? Well prepared 29.9 2742 Sufficiently prepared 58.8 5398 Not sufficiently prepared 10.4 957 Not at all prepared.9 85 Data compiled 1.11.12 by the TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CENTER at SEDL txcc.sedl.org 8

23. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to develop and/or implement formal and informal assessments that track students progress toward IEP goals and objectives? Well prepared 25.8 2372 Sufficiently prepared 59.9 5503 Not sufficiently prepared 13.1 1201 Not at all prepared 1.2 106 24. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to collaborate with others, such as paraeducators and other teachers, in meeting the academic, developmental, and behavioral needs of students with disabilities? Well prepared 37.0 3396 Sufficiently prepared 55.0 5053 Not sufficiently prepared 7.1 653 Not at all prepared.9 80 Section V: English Language Learners 25. Does this teacher have limited English proficient (LEP-ELL) students in their classroom as determined by the Texas Administrative Core (TAC) 89.1201 and 89.1601? A student is considered LEP-ELL if he or she comes from a home in which a language other than English is his/her primary language and who is identified as limited English proficient. Yes 70.5 8196 No 29.5 3425 26. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to provide appropriate ways for LEP-ELL students to demonstrate their learning? Well prepared 28.8 2364 Sufficiently prepared 60.2 4938 Not sufficiently prepared 10.2 837 Not at all prepared.7 57 Total 100.0 8196 Data compiled 1.11.12 by the TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CENTER at SEDL txcc.sedl.org 9

27. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to understand and adhere to federal and state laws that govern education services for LEP-ELL students? Well prepared 29.2 2391 Sufficiently prepared 61.7 5059 Not sufficiently prepared 8.4 686 Not at all prepared.7 60 Total 100.0 8196 28. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to comply with district and campus policies and procedures regarding LEP-ELL students? Well prepared 33.6 2756 Sufficiently prepared 60.4 4949 Not sufficiently prepared 5.4 446 Not at all prepared.5 45 Total 100.0 8196 29. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to support LEP-ELL students in mastering the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS), including the English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS)? Well prepared 29.5 2418 Sufficiently prepared 60.2 4933 Not sufficiently prepared 9.6 788 Not at all prepared.7 57 Total 100.0 8196 30. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to model and teach the forms and functions of academic English in content areas? Well prepared 30.4 2493 Sufficiently prepared 59.8 4900 Not sufficiently prepared 9.1 742 Not at all prepared.7 61 Total 100.0 8196 Data compiled 1.11.12 by the TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CENTER at SEDL txcc.sedl.org 10

Section VI: Technology Integration 31. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to use technology available on the campus to integrate curriculum TEKS and Technology Applications TEKS to support student learning? Well prepared 39.8 4626 Sufficiently prepared 54.3 6305 Not sufficiently prepared 5.5 640 Not at all prepared.4 50 32. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to provide technology-based classroom learning opportunities that allow students to interact with real-time and/or online content? Well prepared 36.2 4202 Sufficiently prepared 56.0 6509 Not sufficiently prepared 7.3 854 Not at all prepared.5 56 33. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to teach students developmentally appropriate technology skills? Well prepared 34.1 3961 Sufficiently prepared 58.1 6754 Not sufficiently prepared 7.3 847 Not at all prepared.5 59 34. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to use technology to make learning more active and engaging for students? Well prepared 40.1 4662 Sufficiently prepared 52.5 6106 Not sufficiently prepared 6.9 797 Not at all prepared.5 56 Data compiled 1.11.12 by the TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CENTER at SEDL txcc.sedl.org 11

Section VII: Use of Technology with Data 35. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to use technology to collect, manage, and analyze student data using software programs (such as Excel or an electronic grade book)? Well prepared 37.3 4338 Sufficiently prepared 56.2 6532 Not sufficiently prepared 6.0 694 Not at all prepared.5 56 Missing.0 1 36. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to use technology to collect, manage, and analyze multiple data sources in order to interpret learning results for students? Well prepared 32.8 3806 Sufficiently prepared 58.3 6780 Not sufficiently prepared 8.4 972 Not at all prepared.5 62 Missing.0 1 37. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to use technology to document student learning to determine when an intervention is necessary and appropriate? Well prepared 31.5 3657 Sufficiently prepared 58.9 6849 Not sufficiently prepared 9.0 1042 Not at all prepared.6 72 Missing 1 1 Total 11621 11621 Data compiled 1.11.12 by the TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CENTER at SEDL txcc.sedl.org 12

38. To what extent was this beginning teacher prepared to use available technology to collect and manage formative assessment data to guide instruction? Well prepared 31.9 3703 Sufficiently prepared 58.9 6843 Not sufficiently prepared 8.6 1005 Not at all prepared.6 69 Missing.0 1 Section VIII: Overall Evaluation of the Educator Preparation Program 39. What is your overall evaluation of how well the educator preparation program prepared this teacher? Select the one statement that most closely matches your current overall perspective on the program. The teacher was well prepared by the program for the first year of teaching. The teacher was sufficiently prepared by the program for the first year of teaching. The teacher was not sufficiently prepared by the program for the first year of teaching. The teacher was not at all prepared by the program for the first year of teaching. 37.9 4409 55.4 6438 6.0 700.6 74 Data compiled 1.11.12 by the TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE CENTER at SEDL txcc.sedl.org 13