Student Community Engagement Strategy. Version: 9

Similar documents
Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

Student Experience Strategy

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Bold resourcefulness: redefining employability and entrepreneurial learning

UNIVERSITY OF DERBY JOB DESCRIPTION. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. JOB NUMBER SALARY to per annum

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

IMPACTFUL, QUANTIFIABLE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL?

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

University of Plymouth. Community Engagement Strategy

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Meeting of the Senatus Researcher Experience Committee to be held on Thursday, 27 May 2010 at 2.15 p.m. in the Lord Provost Elder Room, Old College

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

First Line Manager Development. Facilitated Blended Accredited

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Student Counselling Service

Director, Intelligent Mobility Design Centre

Minutes of the one hundred and thirty-eighth meeting of the Accreditation Committee held on Tuesday 2 December 2014.

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

LIBRARY AND RECORDS AND ARCHIVES SERVICES STRATEGIC PLAN 2016 to 2020

Programme Specification

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

A Framework for Articulating New Library Roles

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Programme Specification

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

Programme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences

Senior Research Fellow, Intelligent Mobility Design Centre

Online Master of Business Administration (MBA)

Aurora College Annual Report

Course Specification Executive MBA via e-learning (MBUSP)

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

Foundation Certificate in Higher Education

Associate Professor of Electrical Power Systems Engineering (CAE17/06RA) School of Creative Arts and Engineering / Engineering

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

Job Description Head of Religious, Moral and Philosophical Studies (RMPS)

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

Primary Award Title: BSc (Hons) Applied Paramedic Science PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Institutional review. University of Wales, Newport. November 2010

BSc (Hons) Property Development

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire

Programme Specification

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

Programme Specification

THREE-YEAR COURSES FASHION STYLING & CREATIVE DIRECTION Version 02

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

An APEL Framework for the East of England

State Parental Involvement Plan

Summary and policy recommendations

Services for Children and Young People

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications POSTGRADUATE ADVANCED CERTIFICATE IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES. June 2012

LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY Department of Electrical Engineering Job Description

Teaching Excellence Framework

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

Draft Budget : Higher Education

University of the Arts London (UAL) Diploma in Professional Studies Art and Design Date of production/revision May 2015

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Loyalist College Applied Degree Proposal. Name of Institution: Loyalist College of Applied Arts and Technology

Proposal for the Educational Research Association: An Initiative of the Instructional Development Unit, St. Augustine

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UWE UWE. Taught course. JACS code. Ongoing

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

TRANSNATIONAL TEACHING TEAMS INDUCTION PROGRAM OUTLINE FOR COURSE / UNIT COORDINATORS

CAUL Principles and Guidelines for Library Services to Onshore Students at Remote Campuses to Support Teaching and Learning

Adapting for the future: a plan for improving the flexibility of UK postgraduate medical training

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

ÉCOLE MANACHABAN MIDDLE SCHOOL School Education Plan May, 2017 Year Three

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

DICE - Final Report. Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

The development of our plan began with our current mission and vision statements, which follow. "Enhancing Louisiana's Health and Environment"

5 Early years providers

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

David Livingstone Centre. Job Description. Project Documentation Officer

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Pharmaceutical Medicine

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Quality Assurance of Teaching, Learning and Assessment

Job Description: PYP Co-ordinator

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Teacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading

PROJECT DESCRIPTION SLAM

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ACCESS AGREEMENT

Programme Specification

Dr Padraig Walsh. Presentation to CHEA International Seminar, Washington DC, 26 January 2012

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

Inspiring Communities. Working together for mutual benefit

Evaluation Report Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition

Transcription:

Student Community Engagement Strategy Authors: Dawn Smith Version: 9 Date: 28 November 2014 2014 2016

Contents Scope... 3 Mission... 3 Vision for 2016+... 3 Achieving the vision... 4 Opportunities and challenges... 6 Key strategic initiatives... 6 Environmental Setting... 6 Strategic and Policy Context... 6 Current Challenges:... 6 Progress 2014... 6 Evaluation... 7 Stakeholders... 7 Outline Activity Plan... 7 Work Packages:... 7 Resources... 7 Appendix 1 Community Engagement Reference Group (CERG) Members... 8 Appendix 2 Student Community Engagement Impact and Evaluation Plan... 9 Appendix 3: Student Community Engagement Review, August 2014... 12 Our aims and activities... 12 What is our evaluation strategy?... 12 What impact do we aim to have on the student experience?... 12 How do we plan to deliver the objectives?... 12 What has the Student Community Engagement project achieved so far?... 12 Page 2 of 12

Scope This document sets out the strategy for the Student Experience Project s Student Community Engagement work stream. The document is used for: Communication, consultation and refinement of our vision and plans Driving our annual planning activity and work prioritisation Securing resources and partnerships Mission The Student Community Engagement project aims to audit current activity, explore mainstreaming this and to showcase excellent examples of work across the University. To fulfil the aims of this project, working collaboratively with colleagues across the Schools, Colleges and Central Support Services and also with stakeholders will be essential. Vision for 2016+ As a result of the work that is being undertaken by the Student Community Engagement project the following groups of key stakeholders: Students Staff Management Community Are better informed about the breadth of extra/ co-curricular opportunities available to them. Are able to identify how to take part in engagement Recognise and harness the value of being involved in engagement Collaborate actively as partners in the work of the engagement project Are satisfied with the quality of support and direction provided Work in partnership with the student engagement project: sharing good practice, developing new activity and networks across the Identify key points of contact and collaborate through a partnership approach to develop and deliver a University wide framework for engagement Share and learn within a network of practitioners Are able to consider the future resource implications of increasing and mainstreaming Community Engagement activity based on evidence. Can benchmark student engagement activity against UK and international HEIs Promote good practice and innovation in student engagement to colleagues across the institution Understand how a cohesive engagement structure can help to foster and build more positive relationships with the local and global Understand what opportunities are available by working in partnership with the University Are able to easily identify key points of contact across the University Share and learn within a network of practitioners from the University and externally Benefit from collaboration with students, bringing social change to a wide range of projects Provide the opportunity for stakeholders to play a role in the education of students, increasing students' perspective and better equipping them for work and the enhancement of lifelong learning Page 3 of 12

Achieving the vision As outlined in the activity plan, the focus will be on activities within six key areas. Each of which have strong alignment with themes in the University Strategic Plan. Strategic Themes The Strategic Plan has a number of elements which are aligned with the Student Community Engagement plan, including equipping our graduates with the expertise and graduate attributes they need to achieve their full potential within the global. Outstanding Student Experience 1. Raise students awareness and take-up of curricular and co-curricular opportunities (through engagement) and expanding provision of these opportunities 2. Promoting and recognising students participation in co- and extra-curricular activities which can contribute towards achievement of the Edinburgh Award (including through engagement). 3. Creating lifelong links with alumni, and between the University and the wider Edinburgh, which are mutually beneficial and which bring richness to our student experience 4. Support Schools to develop and pilot initiatives that improve the level of engagement with the 5. Foster in our students a sense of belonging in the local 6. Provide a framework within which students can identify, understand, choose and create opportunities for engagement Global impact The Strategic Plan sets out expectations that we will position ourselves at the forefront of understanding of trends in regions with the greatest pace of economic and social change, and use this knowledge to mitigate the risks and maximise the opportunities of working internationally. 1. Benchmark engagement activity internationally and explore how this can inform future development within the University. Lifelong learning The Strategic Plan includes building on our Enlightenment principles to enhance public engagement with our work, influence policymakers, and bring about change; make our resources and expertise widely available; be a responsible and influential neighbour, employer and adviser; build an informed, engaged and international of alumni and associate friends, through a lifetime of contact. 1. Welcome local residents and members of our wider to participate in lectures, conferences, and wide-ranging festival, cultural and sporting events, to enjoy our galleries, collections and other facilities, and to take up lifelong learning opportunities 2. Engaging positively with local councils and other key partners over a range of issues through engagement Page 4 of 12

3. Encouraging individuals and teams of staff and students to participate in sporting events and competitions and to undertake volunteering activities 4. Recognising the contribution of our former students, and increasing the extent and depth of the engagement of our alumni and associate friends in the current and future life of the University Social responsibility 1. Maximise our contribution to society 2. Balance our s desire for around-the-clock access to responsive infrastructure against the impact on our costs and carbon footprint 3. Embedding our commitment to social responsibility and sustainability in our curricula, policies, strategies and procedures 4. Motivating all members of the University to become effective advocates who actively support best practice, innovation and leadership with regard to social responsibility and sustainability 5. Offering every student opportunities to study the broader aspects of current global challenges, social responsibility and sustainability, and to explore in depth how their chosen subjects relate to them. 6. Demonstrating and reporting our main social, environmental and economic impacts Partnerships 1. Deriving maximum benefit from external expertise and participation in national and international networks 2. Exploring opportunities to collaborate and share activities, services, systems and facilities internally, across institutional boundaries, and with commercial partners, where mutual benefits can be realised 3. Creating and supporting partnerships within and beyond the University, between students, staff and stakeholders Equality and Widening Participation 1. Embed equality, inclusion and diversity as fundamental principles throughout our 2. Enable students from under-represented groups to fully embrace their University experience, successfully complete their programme of study and expand their ambitious and employment opportunities 3. Raising engagement and aspirations in individuals from under-represented groups, broadening the base of our applicant pool Page 5 of 12

Opportunities and challenges Key strategic initiatives The following University initiatives influence the Student Community Engagement strand: Learning and Teaching strategy (and also Emerging Vision for Learning and Teaching) Widening Participation strategy Public Engagement strategy (Beltane) Community Engagement strategy (CAM current and new) Employability EUSA Volunteering strategy Environmental Setting There has been a sector-wide move towards increasing activity in student engagement. As public engagement has become more present within the research agenda, this is now being mirrored within learning and teaching within the sector. External organisations, such as the Talloires network (http://talloiresnetwork.tufts.edu/), which bring together HEIs with a commitment to civic engagement now have a global presence and service learning is well established in North America. Internally, there is a move to develop a University s Learning and Teaching vision and to consider how degree programmes should be constructed. The following parameters (which are still for consultation purposes and not finalised) could provide a structure to increase the use of engagement within the curriculum: A portfolio approach for a complicated and unpredictable future Giving students agency to create their own learning Extend learning beyond the traditional knowledge-centred course Every student a researcher/practitioner Course design for 21st century learners Focus on multiple learning styles and learning for life Strategic and Policy Context University of Edinburgh Strategic Plan 2012-16 UK Quality Code for Higher Education QAA Scotland Enhancement Themes Curriculum for Excellence influencing expectations and shaping previous educational experiences NCCPE (National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement) Talloires Network (http://talloiresnetwork.tufts.edu/) Current Challenges: There are a number of challenges which have been encountered to date: Lack of University strategy for engagement Lack of resources (academic and support staff are largely involved in this area because they are interested, not because there is professional recognition) Confusion for internal and external stakeholders about key contacts Duplication of roles (both internally and externally) Sustainability (this project is funded until February 2016) Parity across a large, devolved institution Progress 2014 The Student Community Engagement strand started in February 2014 with the appointment of a Community Engagement Developer. In 2014 the following progress has been made: Internal audit of existing activity Benchmarking of engagement in UK and international HEIs HEA secondment to The Melting Pot (April May 2014), establishing a better understanding of the third sector in Edinburgh Embedding of engagement within the curriculum in a new undergraduate degree programme Pro Science pilot Relationships with external groups for pilot projects Establishment of Community Engagement Reference Group Appointment of Community Engagement Project Officer (intern) Page 6 of 12

MOOC pilots in development for delivery with partners (Midlothian Council and Edinburgh College) in early 2015 Consultancy to Scottish Government about student engagement Collaboration with Careers Service and delivery of workshop Close collaboration with Employability Consultancy and Beltane through informal secondments Evaluation The Student Community Engagement project will evaluate its impact on the student and staff experience by collecting case studies, showcasing internal activity and examples of good practice in other institutions. The project audited and recorded existing activity at the outset, and data will be collected at later stages to monitor the levels of engagement across student cohorts. More detailed information about the evaluation strategy can be found in Appendix 2 (page 10). Stakeholders Students, staff and members are central to this strategy. Amongst a network of key stakeholders, the Student Community Engagement project considers its Reference Group a working group of practitioners from across the University to be key. Other internal central stakeholders include Beltane, Employability Consultancy, EUSA, Information Services, the Institute for Academic Development, Widening Participation, and colleagues in Schools and Colleges which are either already engaged or looking to engage in this area. Externally, this project works closely with groups in the local area including the City of Edinburgh Council, schools and colleges, third sector organisations and other members looking to work in partnership with students. Outline Activity Plan Work Packages: Deliver an evidence-based report including mapping of how students are engaging in this activity and a taxonomy of models Develop case studies (including talking heads) from staff, students and groups Create a new website Recommend changes to the University s website Explore the use of MOOCs within student engagement Support the development, delivery and evaluation of new pilots Resources Staffing The Student Community Engagement project is currently staffed by one FTE Community Engagement Developer, in post from February 2014 to February 2016. This is supported by a PhD student intern for five hours each week for a period of six months from August 2014 to February 2016. The project is based at 15 Buccleuch Place and is managed by the Student Experience Project Manager. The Community Engagement Reference Group will meet on a regular basis and is chaired by Sarah Purves (EUSA), benefitting from the experience of staff from across the University with an interest in engagement (See Appendix 1 for current membership). Budget Proposed budget of 8,000 for 2014/15, it is expected that this will cover: salary for intern, event for practitioners, benchmarking research, pilot activity. Page 7 of 12

Appendix 1 Community Engagement Reference Group (CERG) Members Name School/ department Community engagement relevance Web link (if appropriate) Andy Cross Geosciences/ IAD Research outreach courses Colin Graham Geosciences Final year outreach course http://www.drps.ed.ac.uk/09-10/course.php?code=u03524 http://geoscienceoutreach.wordpress.com/ Kathleen Hood Widening Participation Contact with schools/ local authorities/ students before application http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/studentrecruitment/widening-participation Meher Kalenderian EUSA Coordinating student volunteering https://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/getinvolved/volunteering/ Gavin McCabe Employability Consultancy Employability and Edinburgh Award http://www.employability.ed.ac.uk/student/edinburghaward/ Briana Pegado EUSA EUSA President http://www.ed.ac.uk/staff-students/staff/enhancing-studentexperience/initiatives/sep/student-engagement/whos-involved?language=pl%3fid%3d3033 Sarah Purves EUSA (Convenor) Heather Rea Beltane Public engagement between http://www.beltanenetwork.org/ researchers and communities Sue Rigby VP Learning and Teaching Dawn Smith Student Experience Community Engagement Developer Project Marion Smith Health in Social Science New first year -based course http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools- Alison Treacy IAD Innovative Learning Week co-ordinator and outreach course in Law departments/health/undergraduate/ma-health-science-society www.ed.ac.uk/innovative-learning Mark Wilkinson Student Experience Background in Community Education Project Amy Woodgate IS Coordinating MOOC activity http://www.ed.ac.uk/studying/online-learning/moocs/moocs Page 8 of 12

Appendix 2 Student Community Engagement Impact and Evaluation Plan Evidence base revealing a need for improvement Strand: Student Community Engagement Strategic targets: how does the project strand align with strategic targets The University s strategic plan has six themes: outstanding student experience, global impact, lifelong, social responsibility, partnerships, equality and widening participation. Student engagement plays an important role in each of these areas. Most relevant are the strategic themes of outstanding student experience and lifelong and interestingly the KPI of physical and virtual footfall (who does this, and how?) *** This strand will enable students to engage with the external through the curriculum and co/extra-curricular activity supported by the University. Students will acquire graduate attributes which will enhance their employability through engagement. All students (undergraduate and postgraduate, home and international) will be encouraged to engage with this strand. Opportunities will be explored to include students who are not located in Edinburgh. While there may be considerable interest from staff in engaging with the, this strand will only cover student activity. Project strand: Objectives and Impact Objectives Help the University to understand what student engagement already exists Showcase excellent examples of existing student engagement across the University Recommend a communications strategy Development of collaboration between the University and external through MOOCS Explore pilot activity/ identify gaps Evaluation and impact: Student Community Engagement Objectives Outputs (deliverables) Outcomes Impact indicators Data and evidence sources Help the University to Deliver an evidence-based Enable informed decision- Usage: Making colleagues aware Feedback from information Page 9 of 12

understand what student engagement already exists report including mapping of how students are engaging in this activity and taxonomy of models. making and planning. of the evidence which is collected and disseminating information to management. This will be done initially through the Community Engagement Reference Group and the Student Experience Project Board. Satisfaction: collect any evidence from case studies on student satisfaction with engagement opportunities sessions and website Focus groups will be held with students and partners over the course of 2015. The Student Experience Project Staff Survey (due to be live in April 2015) will also provide an opportunity to gain feedback. Impact: Decisions based on evidence provided Showcase excellent examples of existing student engagement across the University Recommend a communications strategy Develop case studies (talking heads) from staff, students and groups. Develop a toolkit to facilitate future development. Create website Recommend changes to University website A more streamlined approach Increased internal networks Better use of contacts with external organisations Establish examples of good practice Signposting of activity across the University Usage: Web analytics, attendance at events Satisfaction: Feedback from events Impact: determine if resources encourage more staff to develop engagement opportunities for students Usage: analytics Satisfaction: Surveys of website Impact: Actions arising from information provided How do examples of good practice influence further activity? The Student Experience Project Staff Survey will also be used to indicated what further resources would benefit student engagement In the long-term, student surveys may be used. Page 10 of 12

MOOCS Explore pilot activity/ identify gaps Explore the use of MOOCs within student engagement Support the development, delivery and evaluation of new pilots Engage with through MOOCs, using relationships with strategic partners (pilots with Midlothian Council and Edinburgh College in 2015) Use existing and consider developing new engagement themed MOOCs Embedded into degree programmes at UG and PG level. Central to new Learning and Teaching Strategy Usage: Number (and background) of MOOC users Satisfaction: of students and partners Impact: graduate attributes developed Usage: How many pilots? Sustain and embed pilot activity. Satisfaction: Encourage students to see the importance and relevance of engagement. Impact: Increase in the number of students engaging in this area. Use data collected by MOOCs team showing the participants Feedback from MOOC user groups Feedback from students participating in pilot activity Films of activity Feedback from pilot courses Focus group with students Focus group with groups Impact evaluation of Pro Science pilot in spring 2015 Impact evaluation of UG/ PGT courses in summer 2015 (including student focus groups/ survey) Page 11 of 12

Appendix 3: Student Community Engagement Review, August 2014 Our aims and activities The Student Community Engagement (SCE) project aims to explore student engagement activity across the University and consider how it should be recorded and stored. SCE aims to evaluate the costs and benefits of student engagement and consider the outreach potential offered by MOOCs and other open educational resources. Additionally, this project intends to report on the potential for future up-scaling of this activity to become a mainstay of student activity in both curriculum and extra-curricular areas and benchmark against current best practice in the UK and internationally. What is our evaluation strategy? SCE will evaluate its impact on the student and staff experience by collecting case studies. The project audited and recorded existing activity at the outset, and data will be collected at later stages to monitor the levels of engagement by staff and across student cohorts. What impact do we aim to have on the student experience? Developing and increasing the profile of engagement activity across the University will enable more students to become involved. Through engagement, students will develop as active citizens and students may participate in and view the local Edinburgh differently. By placing engagement in the curriculum, students will be able to reflect through experiential learning and to articulate their new skills in line with both the University s employability strategy and with the broader learning and teaching strategy. How do we plan to deliver the objectives? SCE plans to improve the student experience through the following activities: developing a taxonomy of existing activity; exploring and establishing a toolkit for staff; establishing a network of practitioners across UK and international higher education institutions to benchmark and share good practice; working collaboratively with colleagues across the University to share ideas and to establish a strong internal network; exploring avenues of engagement that already exist, particularly within the curriculum, to identify processes that can be mirrored in other areas; identifying key stakeholders in the and considering where future activity can be carried out. What has the Student Community Engagement project achieved so far? SCE is carrying out an internal review of existing activity. There is already a broad range of activity and there is an appetite to develop this further and for engagement to feature more centrally within learning and teaching across the University. Students already have the opportunity to engage with the through long-standing degree programmes and there are new initiatives launching in 2014/15 and 2015/16. Several pilots are being developed including consolidation of the Pro Science programme (in which undergraduate science students work with secondary school children across Edinburgh) and plans to facilitate interaction between students and other sectors of the local. In August 2014 a PhD intern was appointed to support the SCE strand. A Community Engagement Reference Group has been established that brings together academic and support staff from across the University to reflect on and review student activity in the. Page 12 of 12