Nuts and Bolts for NEW PDers Florida Professional Development

Similar documents
Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

Educational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

State Parental Involvement Plan

School Leadership Rubrics

ESTABLISHING A TRAINING ACADEMY. Betsy Redfern MWH Americas, Inc. 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 200 Broomfield, CO

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

District English Language Learners (ELL) Plan

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Quality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses

Strategic Plan Dashboard

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Xenia Community Schools Board of Education Goals. Approved May 12, 2014

Jefferson County School District Testing Plan

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

The Site Visit: How to Prepare for It & What to Expect. STARTALK Conference Atlanta, GA May 3, 2012

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Comprehensive Progress Report

BEST PRACTICES FOR PRINCIPAL SELECTION

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

with Specific Procedures for UT Extension Searches

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report Sarasota County School District February 12-14, 2014

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report. Sarasota County School District April 25-27, 2016

RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS

State Budget Update February 2016

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

HIDDEN RULES FOR OFFICE HOURS W I L L I A M & M A R Y N E U R O D I V E R S I T Y I N I T I A T I V E

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position)

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

GOVERNOR S COUNCIL ON DISABILITIES AND SPECIAL EDUCATION. Education Committee MINUTES

LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY Department of Electrical Engineering Job Description

1GOOD LEADERSHIP IS IMPORTANT. Principal Effectiveness and Leadership in an Era of Accountability: What Research Says

Welcome. Paulo Goes Dean, Eller College of Management Welcome Our region

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

Brockton Public Schools. Professional Development Plan Teacher s Guide

Hiring Procedures for Faculty. Table of Contents

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

SEARCH PROSPECTUS: Dean of the College of Law

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

5 Early years providers

INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR PRINCIPAL SAINTS CATHOLIC COLLEGE JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

SELF-ASSESSMENT EXTREMISM & RADICALISATION SELF-ASSESSMENT AND RISK ASSESSMENT

Services for Children and Young People

Tulsa Community College Staff Salary Schedule (Effective July 1, 2015)

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

How Might the Common Core Standards Impact Education in the Future?

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

CERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Current Position Information (if applicable) Current Status: SPA (Salary Grade ) EPA New Position

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

KDE Comprehensive School. Improvement Plan. Harlan High School

Adult Education ACCE Presentation. Neil Kelly February 2, 2017

Irtiqa a Programme: Guide for the inspection of schools in The Emirate of Abu Dhabi

Clinical Quality in EMS. Noah J. Reiter, MPA, EMT-P EMS Director Lenox Hill Hospital (Rice University 00)

The Efficacy of PCI s Reading Program - Level One: A Report of a Randomized Experiment in Brevard Public Schools and Miami-Dade County Public Schools

INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM PROCEDURES MANUAL

School Data Profile/Analysis

The mission of the Grants Office is to secure external funding for college priorities via local, state, and federal funding sources.

Harriet Beecher Stowe Elementary School

Brandon Alternative School

ASCD Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind

Transcription:

Nuts and Bolts for NEW PDers Florida Professional Development FASD Leadership Conference September 24, 2012 Eileen McDaniel Bureau Chief Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention

Purpose of Session Overview of PD System Requirements and Reason for Protocol Standards Summary of Protocol Standards Overview of Site Visit Process Information for Districts Preparing for a Review Information for Future Review Team Members Where to Go/Who to Contact for More Information Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention

History of Protocol Standards 2000 2002: Florida Legislature directs Department to develop a system for evaluating the quality of district professional learning systems; establishes F.S. 1012.98, School Community Professional Development Act 2001-2002: Development of Florida s Professional Development System Evaluation Protocol 2002 2006: First Review Cycle 2006 2009: Second Review Cycle 2009 2010: Revision of Protocol Standards 2010: Current Version of Protocol Standards incorporated into State Board Rule 6A-5.071 Master Inservice Plan Requirements 2010 Present: Third Review Cycle Fourth Year Cycle, Year Three is 2012-2013 Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 3

Statutory Requirements - Section 1012.98, F.S. Purpose of Professional Development System: Increase student achievement Enhance classroom instructional strategies that promote rigor and relevance throughout the curriculum Prepare students for continuing education and the workforce Continuous support provided for all education professionals and temporary intervention for those who need improvement in knowledge, skills, and performance Provide scientific research-based professional learning Support School Improvement Plans Collaborative development with stakeholders Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 4

Statutory Requirements (cont.) Responsibilities of districts District professional development systems aligned with student and personnel needs and data sources, including: Student achievement School discipline School environment surveys Assessments of parental satisfaction Performance evaluations School Improvement Plans Content of district systems Technology-based delivery Follow-up activities Evaluation methods Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 5

Statutory Requirements (cont.) Responsibilities of Florida Department of Education (FDOE) Best practice methods by which the state and district school boards may evaluate and improve the professional development system (standards) Report annually any school district that, in the determination of the department, has failed to provide an adequate professional development system (criteria for review in standards) Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 6

Development of Protocol System Alignment with national standards and state initiatives Collaboration with professional learning experts around the state Field testing Feedback and comments Redevelopment overview Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 7

Redevelopment for Third Cycle Change in terms: educator instead of teacher ; professional learning instead of development New standards: 3.1.3 Research/Evidence Basis 3.1.4 Content Standards for Student Outcomes 3.1.5 Integration of Initiatives 3.1.6 Leadership Development - review of standard suspended for remainder of cycle 3.1.7 Non-instructional Staff 2.1.5 Individual Leadership Development Plan Modified Standards: 3.2.2. Content Focused 2.2.7. Coordinated Records 3.1.8. Professional Learning Facilitators 3.4.6. Fiscal Resources Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 8

Overview of Standards 65 Standards Three Levels: District School Educator Four Strands in Each Level: Planning Delivery Implementing Evaluating Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 9

Judgment Scale based on professional judgment 1. Unacceptable: little or no evidence that the district is implementing the standard 2. Marginal: inconsistent evidence (observed in a few faculty or schools, a few components of the standard) 3. Good: considerable evidence (observed in many faculty or schools, many components of the standard) 4. Excellent: pervasive evidence (almost all faculty and schools, almost all components of the standard) Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 10

Site Visit Process Four-year cycle to review all 67 school districts and 4 university research schools Notification for 2012-2013 has occurred Review team composition peer reviewers, contracted team leader Sampling of schools representative sampling, at least 10% of district schools District-level report is shared after visit individual school findings not reported Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 11

Site Visit Process (cont.) District Reviews Site visits to selected schools 1 day/2 team members and district office team size varies based on district size Interviews with educators, school administrators, district staff Team reviews documents for all levels Judgments on each standard are made collaboratively by team members visiting school sites/district office Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 12

Site Visit Process (cont.) District Office Visit Interviews with professional development director and other staff members involved in professional learning Document Reviews: District professional development systems, including other district plans such as Master Inservice Plans, district technology and reading plans District strategic plans that incorporate professional learning initiatives Evaluations of professional learning Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 13

Site Visit Process (cont.) School Visits Educator Level interviews 5 teachers selected by reviewer across grade levels about 30-45 minutes each School Level interviews principal and/or assistant principal or school administrative team about 1 to 1 ½ hours Document Reviews: Individual Professional Development Plans (IPDP) for five selected teachers (1.1.1 and following) School professional development plans School calendars Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 14

Preparing for a Site Visit Notification of review and confirming dates with Department Recommendations for hotels Coordinate times and confirm school selections with Team Leader Provide teacher lists for selected schools Provide directions to schools Gather documents for team to review Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 15

Reviewer Qualifications Reviewer Sources: FDOE or district professional development staff Regional Consortia or other service provider Institutions of Higher Education with approved teacher education programs Reviewer Qualifications Active or retired staff member of organizations above 5 or more years in educational administrative positions 2 or more years of expertise in planning, conducting, or administering professional development programs Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 16

Reviewer Training Dates New Reviewer Preparation Session Two day session Announcements are made through FDOE s Paperless Communication System and through PD Director Listserv Experienced Reviewer Update Session Conference Call to be scheduled Webcast (future) Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 17

Protocol System Documents Online Florida s Professional Development System Evaluation Protocol 2010: http://www.fldoe.org/profdev/pdf/pdsprotocol.pdf Reviewer s Guide, Third Cycle: http://www.fldoe.org/profdev/pdf/pdsreviewers.pdf Requirements for District Professional Development Systems: http://www.fldoe.org/profdev/cklist.asp Cross District Reports and Checklists for Reviews: http://www.fldoe.org/profdev/pdstandards.asp Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 18

Contact Information Debbie Cooke, WPLG Consulting and FASD Phone: 561-629-8078 Email: wpglconsulting@comcast.net Abigail Letcher, Program Specialist Phone: 850-245-0548 Email: abigail.letcher@fldoe.org Eileen McDaniel, Bureau Chief Phone: 850-245-0562 E-mail: eileen.mcdaniel@fldoe.org Dr. John Moore, Senior Educational Program Director Phone: 850-245-0546 Email: john.moore@fldoe.org Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention 19