Academic Program Review (APR) Class of Graduate Program Self-study Report Template

Similar documents
Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Ohio Valley University New Major Program Proposal Template

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Program Change Proposal:

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Full-time MBA Program Distinguish Yourself.

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

Department of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

University of Essex Access Agreement

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

University of the Arts London (UAL) Diploma in Professional Studies Art and Design Date of production/revision May 2015

August 22, Materials are due on the first workday after the deadline.

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

Department of Rural Sociology Graduate Student Handbook University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Research Training Program Stipend (Domestic) [RTPSD] 2017 Rules

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

New Programs & Program Revisions Committee New Certificate Program Form

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Pattern of Administration, Department of Art. Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

AAC/BOT Page 1 of 9

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

PROMOTION and TENURE GUIDELINES. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Gordon Ford College of Business Western Kentucky University

The Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Departmental Bylaws

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

College of Engineering. Executive Retreat January 23, 2015 The Penn Stater

Pattern of Administration. For the Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering The Ohio State University Revised: 6/15/2012

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

Upward Bound Program

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Standard IV: Students

Programme Specification

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

UNDERSTANDING THE INITIAL CAREER DECISIONS OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT GRADUATES IN SRI LANKA

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM REVIEW REVIEW PROCESS

Guidelines for Incorporating Publication into a Thesis. September, 2015

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH A NEW GRADUATE DEGREE

Department of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *

College of Liberal Arts (CLA)

08-09 DATA REVIEW AND ACTION PLANS Candidate Reports

Department of Communication Promotion and Tenure Criteria Guidelines. Teaching

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UWE UWE. Taught course. JACS code. Ongoing

PHL Grad Handbook Department of Philosophy Michigan State University Graduate Student Handbook

EVALUATION PLAN

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

SORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS POLICY ON EXPANSION FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Chief Academic Officer s Guidelines For Preparing and Reviewing Promotion and Tenure Dossiers

WHY GRADUATE SCHOOL? Turning Today s Technical Talent Into Tomorrow s Technology Leaders

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

LEARN. LEAD. DISCOVER.

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Faculty of Social Sciences

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

Retaining Postdoc Women Through Effective Postdoctoral Policies. Helen Mederer Department of Sociology University of Rhode Island

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

HDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 Version: 2.01

Post-Master s Certificate in. Leadership for Higher Education

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. GRADUATE HANDBOOK And PROGRAM POLICY STATEMENT

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

Course Buyout Policy & Procedures

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

School of Basic Biomedical Sciences College of Medicine. M.D./Ph.D PROGRAM ACADEMIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Art Department Bylaws and Policies Approved 4/24/02

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT EXTERNAL REVIEWER

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Curriculum for the doctoral (PhD) programme in Natural Sciences/Social and Economic Sciences/Engineering Sciences at TU Wien

Review Panel Report Oregon State University. Science and Mathematics Education Graduate Program

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Foundation Certificate in Higher Education

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

Transcription:

Academic Program Review (APR) Class of 2018-19 Graduate Program Self-study Report Template Program: Program Director/Coordinator Name: Program Self-study Contact: (if different from above) Self-study Contact Email: Self-study Contact Phone Number: Program Overview Summary of programming available online and at locations off the main Orlando campus 1. Provide a hyperlink to the program s mission or state it below. If the program s mission is identical to the department s mission, you may respond by simply saying so. (Note: program mission is a comprehensive statement that describes the purpose(s) of the program, including its main functions, activities, and stakeholders; it is included as a component of the program s institutional effectiveness student learning outcomes assessment plan) 2. Refer to the supplemental summary above and review the proportion of the program available online and the list of locations off the main Orlando campus where a substantial proportion of the program is offered face-to-face. Discuss any plans for reduction or expansion of online or off-campus program offerings, if applicable. Note any niche opportunities. 3. List competing program(s), particularly those within the State University System of Florida. 4. Describe any interdisciplinary and/or international aspects of the program. Consider the following: a. interdisciplinary partnerships (internal or external) 1

b. faculty cluster participation c. centers or institutes affiliations d. curricular aspects Contributing Faculty Overview 1. Seven-year department trend data (faculty counts and FTE) http://ikm.ucf.edu/academicprograms/program-review/ 2. Contributing Faculty Activity Worksheet completed by the department for the review 3. List of noteworthy awards and achievements accomplished by department faculty members since 2013 4. List of significant professional service activities undertaken by department faculty members since 2013 5. department/unit faculty workload policy 6. department/unit faculty annual evaluation standards and procedures 7. department/unit (or college) promotion and tenure criteria 8. department minimum teaching qualifications statement (Discipline Description) 9. current faculty CVs 10. distribution of instruction (by SCH and section) a. by faculty type (full-time versus part-time) and b. by faculty with and without a terminal degree in the field (undergraduate only) average 9-month faculty salaries by faculty rank, department and college overview of Faculty Cluster Initiative website 5. Review the faculty counts and FTE trend data provided by Institutional Knowledge Management and the faculty workload policy if available. Discuss the degree to which department faculty members have the capacity to meet the program s goals and objectives; address the relative appropriateness of faculty mix to support those undertakings (consider full-time vs. adjunct; academic ranks and tenure status; areas of expertise) 6. Reflect on program faculty retention, mentoring, and advancement. 2

7. If there is concern about faculty capacity to achieve program goals, provide a future hiring plan that prioritizes needs. Student and Prospect Overview seven-year program trend data http://ikm.ucf.edu/academic-programs/program-review/ number of degrees awarded to minorities 8. Review the trend data provided above and reflect on upward or downward trends of the program s applicant pool (if applicable) and enrolled majors over the review period. Consider the following in your response: mix of full-time and part-time prospective and enrolled students. o undergraduate GPAs and test scores (e.g., GMAT, GRE) o mix of full-time and part-time prospective and enrolled students 9. Review program data provided above and reflect on the following: o mix of gender and ethnicity among prospective and enrolled students Given these data on students and student demographics, evaluate your ability to recruit and retain a diverse student body within your program. What plans do you have for the future recruitment and retention of a diverse population of students in your program? 10. Explain any major shifts or challenges faced with regard to enrollments, time-to-degree, degrees awarded. (Consult the trend data provided above) 3

11. Describe any specific program efforts to improve student retention, time-to-degree, or degree attainment. Note any interventions for specific populations. 12. Complete the table below to describe current graduate assistant and postdoctoral associate resources within the program. Type HC* FTE Graduate Teaching Associates (instructors of record) Graduate Teaching Assistants (instructional support) GTA Graders Subtotal Graduate Research Assistants Other Graduate Assistants Subtotal Postdoctoral Associates Total *Headcount Notes For GTAs, note standard stipend amount, typical hours worked & load assigned (e.g., teach or assist with one undergrad course per term) Program Curriculum Design and Student Learning Outcomes program catalog copy program handbooks last two years of institutional effectiveness (student learning outcomes) assessment results reports upcoming year s institutional effectiveness (student learning outcomes) assessment plan selected syllabi (e.g., core courses, representative sample of elective courses) 13. Provide an overview of the program goals and learner outcomes. Refer to the program s institutional effectiveness (student learning outcomes) assessment results and plans (available at https://www.assessment.ucf.edu/). 4

14. Reflect on recent student learning outcomes assessment results and evaluate each of the following: a. extent to which students are achieving planned outcomes b. how the institutional effectiveness assessment process has resulted in program improvements over the last three years 15. What are the program s milestones? A milestone is a course or activity that needs to be accomplished at a certain point in a student s plan of study. These can be identified as items to be completed by a certain semester (e.g., 2nd fall of enrollment), by a certain level (e.g., junior year), or prior to advancing to a next stage of academic progress (e.g., before admission into a limited access program). Examples of milestone activities include: major or career specific standardized exam(s). 16. Provide the curriculum designed to meet the milestones described above. Please do so by identifying the typical course sequence on a year-by-year basis (e.g., first year courses, second year courses); you may attach a separate document to respond to this question (e.g., program curriculum map). 17. Please evaluate the degree to which the program s course/activity/experiences sequence is appropriate to achieve the program outcomes and student learning objectives. 18. If applicable, please identify one or more programs in your field offered elsewhere that provide(s) an exemplar curricular model and/or student outcomes to which the program aspires. In addition to providing the names of the institution(s) and program(s), please describe the key attributes of interest and corresponding goals for student engagement, learning outcomes, and/or other achievements. 5

Student Engagement representative sample of graduate theses and dissertations (if applicable) 19. Describe opportunities for students in the program to engage in research and creative activities. 20. Describe any student internship opportunities and indicate if they are required or optional. If optional, discuss participation rates. 21. Describe any other engagement activities available to students in the program (e.g., service learning and study abroad) and indicate if they are required or optional. If optional, discuss participation rates. Student Accomplishments and Satisfaction Graduating Senior Survey results (last three years) First Destination Survey results (last three years) 22. If applicable, provide licensure pass rates for 2014-15 through 2016-17. Include the total number of students attempting the exam and the total number who pass. 6

23. Does the unit or program currently collect any of the following information regarding program graduates? If so, please provide recent data in that regard and incorporate appropriate reflection. o Job placement rates and employer information o Employer satisfaction o Graduate school placement and caliber of graduate schools 24. Provide a brief summary of student accomplishments during the review period in the following areas: a. awards at the national, regional, state, university and college levels b. significant scholarly and creative works and activities completed outside of regular classroom activity (e.g., publications, presentations, performances) - include the nature of the activity and the venue and note whether the activities were refereed or juried c. other noteworthy student accomplishments 25. Reflect on student perceptions of program quality based on appropriate data sources (e.g., institutional effectiveness assessment results, Graduating Senior Survey results, First Destination Survey results, alumni survey data). SWOT Analysis and Planning benchmarking reports using Academic Analytics, if available 7

26. List program strengths. 27. List program weaknesses. 28. List program barriers, threats, and unique vulnerabilities (e.g., loss of one faculty member may result in inability to offer program). 29. Discuss potential opportunities in the following areas: a. actions to improve program quality b. new ventures to increase demand or improve competitiveness (e.g., internal or external partnership opportunities) c. actions to achieve productivity gains (e.g., recruitment, non-traditional instructional delivery systems) d. actions to improve efficiency and reduce cost 8

e. other opportunities not addressed above 30. Provide any benchmark data collected during the review period, if applicable (e.g., using Academic Analytics), and a list of up to five university s the program would like to be benchmarked against. 31. Articulate key program goals and initiatives moving forward. Note how the program review consultants can help in this regard. Other (Optional) 32. If necessary, please use the space below to provide any information not addressed elsewhere in the self-study that you think important to inform the review of this program. 9

Combination Program Self-Study Addendum Instructions: The following questions will only apply to combination programs. Please respond to the items that do apply to the program addressed in this self-study and insert not applicable to those that do not. Complete the following table for any internal accelerated bachelor s to master s degree programs in which the program participates. Baccalaureate Degree Program Name (e.g., Industrial Engineering, B.S.I.E.) Master s Degree Program Name (e.g., Industrial Engineering, M.S.I.E.) UG Required Hours (128) Grad Required Hours (30) Shared Hours (12) Total Hours (146) Describe the target population(s) and how participation is controlled and limited to high performing undergraduate students. Provide the rational for the program and explain how its design assures the accelerated program does not: - interfere with graduate program coherence; - compromise graduate program quality by inclusion of the undergraduate students in the courses; - dilute graduate program rigor (i.e., graduate program content is progressively more advanced in academic content than the baccalaureate program); or - disregard any graduate program prerequisite course(s). Reflect on the accelerated program s relative success to date. 2. Please describe any other internal combination degree programs that the program participates in (e.g., internal dual master s degrees). Identify the target population, rational for the program, and reflect on its relative success to date. 3. Describe any combination programs (e.g., accelerated, dual, or joint degree programs) in which the program participates with external higher education partners. Provide a summary of 10

enrollments spanning 2015-16 2017-18. Identify the target population, rationale for the program, and reflect on its relative success to date. 11