Rod Library Organizational Structure Plan 2015

Similar documents
Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Robert S. Marx Law Library University of Cincinnati College of Law Annual Report: *

University of Delaware Library STRATEGIC PLAN

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Collections, Technical Services & Scholarly Communications

A Strategic Plan for the Law Library. Washington and Lee University School of Law Introduction

THE ST. OLAF COLLEGE LIBRARIES FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE

Title Columbus State Community College's Master Planning Project (Phases III and IV) Status COMPLETED

Identifying Users of Demand-Driven E-book Programs: Applications for Collection Development

EOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster

Wide Open Access: Information Literacy within Resource Sharing

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Texas Woman s University Libraries

University of Toronto

WSU LIBRARIES DECISION MATRIX FY

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

university of wisconsin MILWAUKEE Master Plan Report

AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey Data Collection Webinar

ONTARIO FOOD COLLABORATIVE

A Framework for Articulating New Library Roles

Comprehensive Student Services Program Review

University Library Collection Development and Management Policy

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Librarian/Library Faculty Meeting

Keeping our Academics on the Cutting Edge: The Academic Outreach Program at the University of Wollongong Library

LIBRARY AND RECORDS AND ARCHIVES SERVICES STRATEGIC PLAN 2016 to 2020

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

Working Group on Integration of Multi-Campus Universities

Librarians of Highlights of a survey of RUL faculty. June 7, Librarians of 2023 June 7, / 11

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

Change Your Life. Change The World.

The Wegwiezer. A case study on using video conferencing in a rural area

GRADUATE CURRICULUM REVIEW REPORT

Libraries Embrace the Engineering Grand Challenges

Open Science at Tritonia Academic Library, University of Vaasa, Finland

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

Roles and Responsibilities Task Force Report December 2014 (Approved by the SBHE January 29, 2015)

Pattern of Administration, Department of Art. Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016

The Impact of Honors Programs on Undergraduate Academic Performance, Retention, and Graduation

Problem Solving for Success Handbook. Solve the Problem Sustain the Solution Celebrate Success

Ministry of Education, Republic of Palau Executive Summary

On the Open Access Strategy of the Max Planck Society

RESEARCH METHODS AND LIBRARY INFORMATION SCIENCE

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE ADVANCEMENT COMMITTEE

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Internship Program. Application Submission completed form to: Monica Mitry Membership and Volunteer Coordinator

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Academic Support Services Accelerated Learning Classes The Learning Success Center SMARTHINKING Student computer labs Adult Education

MINUTES. Kentucky Community and Technical College System Board of Regents. Workshop September 15, 2016

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

Audit Of Teaching Assignments. An Integrated Analysis of Teacher Educational Background and Courses Taught October 2007

Ohio Valley University New Major Program Proposal Template

JAMES PEPPER HENRY. UNIVERSITY OF OREGON Eugene, Oregon BA, Fine Arts, 1988

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

Approved Academic Titles

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

COMM 210 Principals of Public Relations Loyola University Department of Communication. Course Syllabus Spring 2016

Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (IRSSA) October, 2007

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

Next-Generation Technical Services (NGTS) Archivists Toolkit Recommendations

Open Sharing, Global Benefits The OpenCourseWare Consortium

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Nearing Completion of Prototype 1: Discovery

State Parental Involvement Plan

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

Developing skills through work integrated learning: important or unimportant? A Research Paper

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Educational Leadership and Administration

Section 1: Program Design and Curriculum Planning

Scholarship & Travel Award Guidelines. Revised November 2016

MASTER OF EDUCATION (M.ED), MAJOR IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

The UNF Digital Commons

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Elmer E. Rasmuson and Biosciences Libraries

Department of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *

Software Maintenance

Development and Innovation in Curriculum Design in Landscape Planning: Students as Agents of Change

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

Computer Science and Information Technology 2 rd Assessment Cycle

CHESTER FRITZ AUDITORIUM REPORT

Al Cornish Head, Library Systems Washington State University Libraries Pullman, WA

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

IDS 240 Interdisciplinary Research Methods

Online Master of Business Administration (MBA)

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Transcription:

1 Rod Library Organizational Structure Plan 2015 Overview This plan documents the results of a planning process undertaken during 2014 for more effectively structuring departments, staff, and operations of Rod Library at the University of Northern Iowa. The planning process was initiated at the request of Dean Cox in March 2014. The process was spurred on by a number of factors: The retirement of the Head of Technical Services; New initiatives such as the Learning Commons, institutional repository, Museums, etc., which had no obvious place in the existing organizational structure; Existing initiatives which are currently conducted by committees (i.e. public relations) which we desire to move to a position; The need for improved flexibility to allow for the addition of new positions as new needs arise. A Reorganization Task Force was formed by Dean Cox in March 2014 to examine the existing structure and to identify an organizational structure which best meets our mission and helps us best achieve it. The task force, chaired by John Wynstra, consisted of librarians and library staff from various departments and employee types. The final report of the Reorganization Task Force is included as Appendix A of this report. Background Rod Library s current organizational structure includes five departments and the Dean s Office. The departments include Reference and Instructional Services, Collection Management and Special Services, Technical Services, Access Services, and Library Information Technologies. This organization has been in place since 2004 when the Acquisitions and Cataloging departments merged to form Technical Services. All department heads report to the Dean, as do three Deans Office staff members. The Reorganization Task Force began its work by gathering input from staff at library wide meetings utilizing a circle of voices approach. They also collected input through a library-wide survey, open forums, through a presentation at staff development day, and various other means. The task force also analyzed the organizational charts of other libraries as part of this process. The original timeline for the task force had an end date of June 9, but that deadline proved too ambitious, and the task force s timeline was extended until December 2014. This also allowed the input of Technical Services consultants Carol Diedrichs from Ohio State University and Lisa German from Penn State University to be included in final decisions. Goals of the Reorganization

2 This reorganization of Rod Library s overall structure is intended to accomplish a number of goals, shaping library operations for months and years to come. The primary goals were to create an organizational structure that: Aligns library organization structure with the library s role in campus strategic priorities; Effectively merges the Museum unit and provides flexibility to incorporate future new positions as the needs arise; Promotes synergies between work with similar functions to improve the flow to work processes and communication; Promotes transparency and the free flow of ideas and information among everyone in the organization; Enables the Dean of Library Services to focus on external objectives and strategic directions, such as fundraising and promoting campus awareness of Library services. The Task Force focused on the top level of the libraries organizational structure and functions that occur under each. On January 8, 2015 the Library Administrator s Council met and discussed the Reorganization Task Force s report, the organizational charts they presented, and a number of variations from the Dean. In the end there was general consensus around what will be below presented, with final decisions having been made by the Dean. Top Level Organization Structure The new organizational structure (see Appendix B) will include three divisions, all of which report to the Dean. In this arrangement the Dean will act as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and will deal primarily with external functions, and the Associate Deans and Assistant Dean will act as Chief Operating Officers and will deal primarily with internal functions, including daily operations. While the Dean will also direct these top level managers, the intent of this structure is to allow the Dean to focus on external objectives as suggested in the goals above. All current staff and operations will be reorganized within these top level functional units or divisions as described in the remainder of the plan. Divisions are the largest organizational structures and fulfill core library functions. Many of the functions listed under the Administration and Planning Division are prospective and staffing is yet to be determined. Content Discovery Division This division acquires, maintains, and provides access to all of the library s information and resources. The new name refocuses the work of this division away from what was once primarily a print world to one which acquires information in various formats and which preserves and provides access to born digital and locally created or curated material. Data driven decision making has also been a strategic direction, and the continued analysis of our collections and stewardship of what are limited resources is also the work of this group.

3 The Content Discovery Division encompasses the following functions: Collection Management: Emphasis over time will be less on selection of materials and more about ongoing analysis of collections. Acquisitions Interlibrary Loan: Included to allow more synergy in the acquisition of materials regardless of where the request originates. Cataloging/Metadata Digitization/IR: All digitization functions will be centralized within this new division. Scholarly Communication: The education piece related to scholarly communication may end up in the hands of the library s liaisons. Access Services: Included to emphasize the role of the department in collections. IT Discovery: Would include members of the Library IT department who work most closely with the discovery system to allow for a closer work relationship between this function and other collections and metadata functions. Learning and Research Division This division educates library users in making the best use of the library s collections and resources. The new name emphasizes the role the library plays in student learning and the student and faculty research process and moves all functions where learning is paramount under the same umbrella. The previous Special Services areas Fine & Performing Arts, Youth, Special Collections & Archives, and Museums, are included in this division not to downplay the value of their collections in support of student learning but to emphasize the role the librarians and staff play in educating users in their use. The Learning and Research Division encompasses the following functions: Reference: Includes just-in-time instruction and assistance as well as research consultations. Instruction: Credit courses, on shot sessions associated with a particular class or group. Outreach: Included because of the educational emphasis of the programs presented to new groups. Liaisons: Still being solidified, this group of librarians would spend their time working more directly with faculty and communicate with them regarding library needs, services, and changes. Some librarians who work primarily in other areas may also participate on a limited basis in the liaison program. Learning Commons Fine & Performing Arts Collection Youth Collection Special Collections and Archives Museums Administration and Planning Division

4 This division is probably the most diverse and represents the biggest change proposed in the organizational chart. The Administration and Planning division supports the success of the library as an organization through staff development, fundraising, public relations, planning and assessment. It centralizes financial and administrative functions, some of which were previously scattered throughout the organization, and provides a platform to meet the needs of the staff of a growing organization through professional development, rewards systems, diversity training, public relations, and assessment, many of which are currently coordinated by library committees. This demonstrates a commitment on behalf of the Dean to provide the level of support that staff have requested but which has never previously been operationalized. The head of the area is an Assistant Dean, meaning it could be held a P&S professional rather than a faculty member. This is not uncommon in libraries across the country. Many of the positions in this division do not exist and filling them will involve discussion and resource reallocation. The Administration and Planning Division will include not only the current staff of the Dean s Office but the following functions: Administrative support: Dean s office assistance, as well as support for search committees, faculty files, etc. Budget/Business Operations Facilities Human Resources: This includes contract interpretation, management training and assistance, etc. Diversity Organizational Development: This is in many ways an enhancement to the role of the current Employment Development Committee. Could include orientation, change management, staff development and training programs, communication enhancement, employee recognition, etc. PR/Communications/Web: This creates a relationship between PR and the Web. Event coordination IT Infrastructure: Would include members of the Library IT department which support the equipment and technologies of the library. Next Steps and Questions There are a lot of unanswered questions. Here are some attempts to answer them. 1) When will this organization plan go into effect? Some changes will begin immediately, but the real change will occur on July 1, 2015, once the ADs are on board. 2) How will the Associate and Assistant Dean positions be filled? Positions may be filled through internal or external searches, at the discretion of the Dean. All current staff will be eligible to apply for any new position. There are many strong leaders within the organization and allowing them to move into leadership positions will maximize existing staff resources and instill a sense of advancement within the Rod library staff. That being said, in some cases an outside view may be beneficial to progression of the organization. These searches will begin immediately.

5 3) Will there be department heads in the divisions? No. Unit leaders will exist to coordinate various functions within each division. 4) Who will decide how the divisions are organized? Discussion will take place within divisions led by the Associate or Assistant Dean to determine the number of units of unit leaders in each division. 5) What will happen to the LAC? The Library Administrator s Council as it currently is structured will be retired and a new Library Leadership Team (LLT) created which will include the Dean, the two Associate Deans, and the Assistant Dean. This group will meet three times a month. Once a month a meeting of the LLT with unit leaders and others in leadership positions will be convened. 6) Will this new organizational structure improve communication? A change to our organizational structure will not in and of itself improve communication. That must be an ongoing effort. Cross divisional teams will be encouraged to successfully complete complex projects. This new organizational structure has been created with broad involvement of library staff, and holds great promise for more effective library operations that are better aligned with campus priorities. Thanks to the members of the Reorganization Task Force, and all library staff for your input and participation in this process.