NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP FRAMEWORK

Similar documents
Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

A Framework for Safe and Successful Schools

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Priorities for CBHS Draft 8/22/17

School Leadership Rubrics

Second Step Suite and the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Synthesis Essay: The 7 Habits of a Highly Effective Teacher: What Graduate School Has Taught Me By: Kamille Samborski

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Selling Skills. Tailored to Your Needs. Consultants & trainers in sales, presentations, negotiations and influence

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

Secondary English-Language Arts

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Harriet Beecher Stowe Elementary School

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Coaching Others for Top Performance 16 Hour Workshop

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

school students to improve communication skills

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

The 21st Century Principal

Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Program Alignment CARF Child and Youth Services Standards. Nonviolent Crisis Intervention Training Program

Collegiate Academies Response to Livingston School Facility RFA Submitted January 23, 2015

Mooresville Charter Academy

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Kannapolis Charter Academy

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

Incorporating Social and Emotional Learning Into Classroom Instruction and Educator Effectiveness

What does Quality Look Like?

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

COMMUNICATION PLAN. We believe that all individuals are valuable and worthy of respect.

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Executive Summary. Abraxas Naperville Bridge. Eileen Roberts, Program Manager th St Woodridge, IL

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

Career Checkpoint. What is Career Checkpoint? Make the most of your Marketable Skills

EQuIP Review Feedback

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

Sidney Sawyer Elementary School

2017 FALL PROFESSIONAL TRAINING CALENDAR

Strategic Practice: Career Practitioner Case Study

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Changing the face of science and technology. DIVISION OF SOCIAL SCIENCES ISEE. Institute for Scientist & Engineer Educators

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

PCG Special Education Brief

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Systematic reviews in theory and practice for library and information studies

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

Instructional Approach(s): The teacher should introduce the essential question and the standard that aligns to the essential question

Seven Keys to a Positive Learning Environment in Your Classroom. Study Guide

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Section 1: Basic Principles and Framework of Behaviour

Geographic Area - Englewood

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

City of Roseville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Scope of Services

Improving the impact of development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa through increased UK/Brazil cooperation and partnerships Held in Brasilia

Critical Incident Debriefing in a Group Setting Process Debriefing

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Transcription:

NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP FRAMEWORK. Management and Coaching of Instructional Staff: ly develops and manages talent to improve instruction. Indicator Highly a. Evaluation Aligned to the district s Evaluation Frameworks. Synthesizes evidence to provide an accurate assessment of employee s performance towards student b. Tailored Feedback and Coaching Aligned to the District s Evaluation Framework. Gathers data and provides timely, actionable feedback and coaching aligned to expectations for effective teaching. c. Coaching and Development. Invests in the on-going growth and development of adults to improve student learning. d. Differentiated Management. Strategically retains effective staff,, anticipates openings and implements a rigorous selection and hiring process. based on preponderance of evidence Accurately assesses all staff s performance. Consistently describes performance over time in a concise, evidence-based narrative tied to student Consistently provides timely, tailored, iterative, and bite-sized feedback and coaching on quality of instruction that is aligned with expectations in the district s frameworks, is informed by multiple data sources (e.g. IPDP, CAP, etc.) and ensures teacher growth. Communicates feedback in a way that builds from teacher strengths and elicits teacher thinking and ownership over his/her development. Employs effective and differentiated strategies in individual and group professional development that demonstrate knowledge of adult learning. Individual and group professional development results in the growth of all staff as a group and as individuals. support effective teachers. Maximizes staff strengths and skills by strategically placing them in roles that will best support student learning. Develops or manages out ineffective staff. Develops strategies to retain high performing staff. Highly Accurately assesses most staff s performance. Frequently describes performance over time in a concise, evidence-based narrative tied to student Frequently provides timely, tailored, iterative, and bite-sized feedback and coaching on quality of instruction that is aligned with expectations in the district s frameworks, is informed by multiple data sources (e.g. IPDP, CAP, etc.), and ensures teacher growth. Employs effective and differentiated strategies in individual and group professional development that demonstrate knowledge of adult learning. support effective teachers. Maximizes staff strengths and skills by strategically placing them in roles that will best support student learning. Develops or manages out ineffective staff. Assesses some staff s performance accurately. Uses evidence to describe performance over time but evidence is uneven in precision and capture of ties to student Frequency of feedback and coaching is inconsistent or extensive time passes between observation and reception of feedback. Feedback is sometimes aligned with expectations in the district s frameworks. Coaching occasionally ensures teacher growth. Inconsistently employs effective strategies in individual or group professional development. Strategies are not consistently differentiated or do not reflect knowledge of adult learning. support teachers, but does not differentiate to focus on effective teachers. Sometimes develops or manages out ineffective staff. Rarely assesses staff s performance accurately or rarely describes performance over time in an evidence-based narrative. Few evaluations are tied to student Rarely provides timely, tailored, iterative, or bite-sized feedback and coaching on the quality of instruction or feedback is not aligned with expectations in the district s frameworks. Does not use data from multiple sources. Coaching does not result in teacher growth. ly employs strategies for individual or group professional development. Strategies are not differentiated or do not reflect knowledge of adult learning. Leverages ineffective or no systems to select, hire, support or retain staff. Develops or manages out few staff or inappropriately uses the budget process to move out ineffective teachers. Does not recognize effective staff.

. Curriculum, Assessment and Instruction: ly uses curriculum and assessment tools to advance Common Core-aligned instruction. Indicator Highly Demonstrates a deep understanding Demonstrates an understanding of Demonstrates a limited understanding of student mastery of Common Core student mastery of Common Core of student mastery of Common Core Standards. Fosters a school-wide Standards, fosters a school-wide focus Standards with limited attempt to focus on the mastery of these on the mastery of these standards, foster a school-wide focus on the standards. Nearly all teachers and ensures effective tools, systems mastery of these standards. Some demonstrate knowledge of what it and supports are in place to help tools, systems and supports are in takes to attain mastery of these students meet these standards. place to meet those standards, but standards and use effective tools to they are of inconsistent effectiveness. ensure students meet standards. a. Promote Common Core Mastery. Demonstrates a high-level knowledge of the Common Core Standards, and ensures school-wide focus on the standards. b. High-Quality, Grade-Level Materials. Ensures rigorous curricular materials, text and instructional strategies are aligned with Common Core and with each other. c. Planning Aligned to Common Core Mastery. Implements building-wide systems to ensure teachers are creating effective unit and lesson plans aligned to each other and to best-in-class resources. d. Measures for Common Core Mastery. Ensures high quality, effective tools to assess and monitor student mastery of CCSS. e. Academic Interventions. Designs and implements differentiated academic f. Literacy Centered. Implements literacy driven instruction in every classroom to ensure all students are reading, writing, thinking and speaking at high levels. Ensures effective use of texts, supplemental resources and curricular adaptations to support Common Core-aligned instruction. Facilitates collaboration with other school teams to ensure rigor and alignment across the district. Ensures effective processes for planning are in place and used schoolwide. All teachers share plans and systems for unit and lesson planning. Consistently engages teacher teams in data cycles of assessment that result in adjustments to instruction. Tracks analysis of assessment data. Employs a variety of tools to assess and monitor student interventions for all students, whether or not they are making progress. Consistently employs strengths-based writing instruction into nearly all lessons across all content areas. All Highly Ensures effective use of texts, supplemental resources, and curricular adaptations to support Common Core-aligned instruction. Ensures effective processes for planning are in place and used schoolwide. Frequently engages teacher teams in data cycles of assessment that result in adjustments to instruction. Tracks analysis of assessment data. interventions for most students, whether or not they are making progress. Frequently employs strengths-based writing instruction into most lessons across most content areas. Most Inconsistently ensures effective use of texts, supplemental resources, and curricular adaptations. Inconsistently ensures processes for planning are in place. Systems may not be used consistently school-wide or may be of varying effectiveness. Sometimes engages teacher teams in data cycles of assessment. Does not always ensure adjustments are made in response to data. Irregularly tracks analysis of assessment data. interventions for some students, whether or not they are making progress. Sometimes employs strengths-based writing instruction into some lessons across some content areas. Some Does not demonstrate an understanding of student mastery of Common Core Standards or does not attempt to foster a school-wide focus on the mastery of these standards. Limited or no tools, systems and supports are in place to meet those standards. Does not supplement or make adaptations to curriculum or adaptations are not supportive of Common Core-aligned instruction. Does not ensure or use processes for planning or systems are ineffective. Does not engage teacher teams in data cycles of assessment. Does not or inconsistently tracks progress to student mastery through analysis of assessment data. Adjustments are not made in response to data. interventions for few or no students. Rarely employs strengths-based Does not implement a school-wide literacy strategy or implements one that integrates reading and writing instruction into few lessons across few content areas. Few teachers incorporate rating and writing that improves student literacy

. Student and Family Support: Supports students academic, social and emotional growth. Indicator Highly a. Safe and Strengths-Based Culture. Creates a safe and positive learning environment where interventions are proactive and strengths-based. b. Family Engagement Around Supporting Growth. Engages regularly with families about student growth and progress. c. Student Efficacy. Promotes student ownership of learning and social and emotional goals and facilitates student leadership and development. d. Student Interests. Provides access to comprehensive, balanced programming that appeals to students academic and non-academic interests. e. Inclusive Practices. Ensures students are served in the least restrictive environment. Staff implements positive behavior interventions, based on an understanding of child and adolescent development. Learning theories promote accountability and restorative justice. Staff promotes a student culture based on shared norms for social behavior that ensures rigorous learning. Regularly and consistently partners and ensures staff partners with families to engage in dialogue about student progress. Builds and leverages family-based knowledge, skills and resources to support student growth. Consistently promotes student ownership of learning. With student input, creates opportunities for student leadership and development. Supports clear social and emotional learning goals and implements a plan to support students in achieving Ensures access to activities that appeal to diverse, individual student interests. Ensures programming is comprehensive and balanced and aligned to both academic and nonacademic interests. Students take an active role in identifying and supporting activities. Consistently ensures relentless support of all students, serving them in the least restrictive environment with a focus on strengths-based, nonpunitive Highly Regularly engages staff to implement positive behavior interventions, based on an understanding of child and adolescent development and learning theories that promote accountability and restorative justice. Frequently partners and ensures staff partners with families to engage in dialogue about student progress. Builds and leverages family-based knowledge, skills and resources to support student growth. Frequently promotes student ownership of learning, creates and development, supports clear social and emotional learning goals, and implements a plan to support students in achieving Ensures access to activities that appeal to diverse, individual student interests. Ensures programming is comprehensive and balanced, aligned to both academic and non-academic interests. Ensures relentless support of most students, serving them in the least restrictive environment with a focus on strengths-based, non-punitive Sometimes engages staff to implement positive behavior Interventions are sometimes based on an understanding of child and adolescent development and learning theories or inconsistently promote accountability and restorative justice. Sometimes partners and ensures staff partners with families to engage in dialogue about student progress. Sometimes builds and leverages family-based knowledge, skills and resources to support student growth. Sometimes promotes student ownership of learning. Creates limited and development. Creates a plan to support students in achieving mastery, but implements that plan inconsistently. Provides limited access to activities, or activities may not appeal to diverse student interests. Not all activities may be aligned with students academic or non-academic interests. Ensures support of some students, serving them in the least restrictive environment with a limited focus on strengths-based, non-punitive Rarely engages staff to implement positive behavior Interventions are rarely based on an understanding of child and adolescent development and learning theories or do not promote accountability and restorative justice. Rarely partners or does not ensure staff partners with families to engage in dialogue about student progress. Partnerships do not reach all families or result in low levels of engagement from families. Rarely promotes student ownership of learning. Rarely or does not create and development. Rarely supports social and emotional learning goals. Does not create a plan to support students in achieving Does not provide access to activities that appeal to student interests, or does not ensure access to activities that meet students academic and non-academic interests. Rarely ensures support of students, inconsistently serving them in the least restrictive environment, lacking a focus on strengths-based, nonpunitive

. Transformational Leadership: Maintains relentless focus on improving student outcomes through planning, relationships, and personal responsibility. Indicator Highly a. Personal Responsibility and Relentless Drive for Achievement. Demonstrates resiliency in the face of obstacles and resultsorientation in improving student outcomes. b. Strategic Thinking. Creates a plan and develops systems to track priorities with measurable targets. Makes strategic decisions to advance goals. c. Adult Alignment. Ensures all adults are aligned to a clear shared mission build and advance school goals and core values. d. Change Management. Demonstrates an understanding of change processes and manages change effectively. Demonstrates on-going persistence and relentless focus to improve student outcomes. Continuously calibrates and adjusts approach to reach goals. Achieves majority of school goals. ly breaks annual goals into milestones and maps action plans to milestones. Consistently adapts strategy and thinking based on progress toward weekly and monthly milestones. Uses multiple sources of data to align, manage, and modify goals and resources. Creates a clear mission and responsibility for school goals, with all staff aligned to goals and core values. Develops strategic partnerships with high-quality community partners to support the school s vision for student improve student ly reactions and to support staff through change. Is successful at leading all staff and students through change initiatives. Strategically makes tough decisions to manage the change process. Highly Treats most challenges as opportunities and takes responsibility for student outcomes. Innovates and adjusts when plans have not proved successful. ly breaks annual goals into milestones and maps action plans to milestones. Adapts strategy and thinking based on progress toward weekly and monthly milestones. Creates a clear mission and responsibility for school goals, with most staff aligned to goals and core values. Develops strategic partnerships with high-quality community partners to support the school s vision for student improve student ly reactions and to support staff through change. Is successful at leading most staff through change initiatives. Responds constructively to some disappointing moments, but has inconsistent persistence for on-going challenges. Sometime loses focus on student outcomes or does not adjust plans regularly. Breaks annual goals into milestones and maps action plans to milestones. Sometimes adapts strategy and thinking based on progress toward weekly and monthly milestones. School mission is not clear and only some staff are aligned to a responsibility for school goals and core values. Sometimes develops strategic partnerships with highquality community partners to support the school s vision for student improve student Sometimes reactions, with mixed results. Sometimes makes tough decisions to manage the change process. Demonstrates defeatist reactions to challenges. Allows disappointments or failures to take focus away from student outcomes. Does not adjust plans when unsuccessful. Does not or ineffectively breaks annual goals into milestones and maps action plans to milestones. Rarely adapts strategy and thinking based on progress toward weekly and monthly milestones. School mission is not clear and does not create a collaborative school culture of shared responsibility for school goals or core values. Staff are not aligned to goals. Rarely develops strategic partnerships with high-quality community partners to support the school s vision for student mastery or invests in partnerships that do not further the school s vision. Makes minimal effort to implement changes to improve student Rarely tailors approach to address multiple reactions or to support staff through change. Does not make tough decisions to manage the change process.

5a. Quality and Management of Teams. Manages a cabinet or teams to meet student mastery goals. 5. Organizational Leadership: Implements systems and processes to effectively manage operations Indicator Highly Ensures the right people are in Ensures that the right people are in Ensures that the right people are in Cabinet or team positions, and that Cabinet or team positions, and that Cabinet or team positions, but they are empowered to lead in their they are empowered to lead in their systems do not always encourage assigned area. Creates mechanisms assigned area or position. collaboration. Cabinet or team for collaboration towards shared members are sometimes empowered goals. to lead, with mixed results. 5b. Organizational Systems Employs organizational systems to implement plans towards achievement goals. 5c. Communication and Interpersonal Skills. Listens and communicates effectively and strategically based on the situation, audience and needs. 5d. Data Transparency. Uses and shares data to support students. Develops systems to effectively monitor goals and manage staff, time and operational priorities. Systems support forecasting of challenges. staff by listening, tailoring all understood. Manages nearly all conflicts to positive resolution. Works to transform disagreement and dissent into opportunities for mutual gain. Consistently collects and uses support student academic and social emotional growth. Works with staff to translate and share data in a format that ensures student and family access and understanding. Facilitates school-wide review and reflection of data to evaluate effectiveness of strategies. Highly Develops systems to effectively monitor goals and manage staff, time and operational priorities. staff by listening, tailoring most understood. Manages most conflicts to positive resolution and does not avoid difficult conversations. Frequently collects and uses support student academic and social emotional growth. Works with staff to translate and share the data in a format that ensures student and family access and understanding. Develops some systems to monitor goals and manage staff, time and operational priorities. The systems are sometimes effective. staff by listening, tailoring some understood. Manages some conflicts to positive resolution but sometimes avoids difficult conversations. Sometimes collects and uses support student academic and personal growth. Infrequently works with staff to translate and share the data. Data is not consistently shared in a format that ensures student and family access and understanding. Cabinet or team members make minimal contributions to the school s goals. Systems limit collaboration or systems do not exist. Feedback is rarely shared. Develops no systems or ineffective systems to monitor goals and manage staff, time and operational priorities. Infrequently builds rapport with stakeholders and staff by listening, tailoring messages, and ensuring ideas are understood. Unsuccessfully manages conflicts or avoids difficult conversations. Messages are not differentiated or do not reach the intended audience. Rarely collects and uses qualitative and quantitative data to support student academic and social emotional growth. Inconsistently works with staff to translate and share the data. Data does not ensure student and family access and understanding. Ineffectiv e