St. Paul, St. Michael, Our Lady of Lourdes: Pupil Accommodation Review. December 7, 2016

Transcription

1 St. Paul, St. Michael, Our Lady of Lourdes: Pupil Accommodation Review December 7,

2 Opening the Meeting Welcome Prayer Introduction of Committee Members Superintendent John Shanahan Father Daryl Miranda Trustee Davis St. Paul - Principal Dutil-Hoffman, Gerard Lewis, Lisa Brylowski, Anna Borjal-Wyse St. Michael - Principal Thomson, Judith Campbell, Dolly Ducepec Our Lady of Lourdes - Principal Peterson, Marnie McCallum Mario Silva, Comptroller Planning and Development Jessica Peake, Senior Manager Planning and Assessment Maia Puccetti, Superintendent of Facilities Services John Hlady, Manager of Planning and Technology, Transportation 2

3 Tonight s Agenda 3 Welcome & Introductions Purpose of Tonight s Meeting Overview of the Pupil Accommodation Review Process Process to Date Committee s Recommended Solution for St. Michael, St. Paul and Our Lady Of Lourdes Committee s Ask to Trustees Next Steps Question and Answer

4 Pupil Accommodation 4 Committee Mandate Represent schools under review Official conduit for information shared between Board and communities Provide feedback on staff reports and proposed options, and consider alternative options for discussion Provide local perspective Feedback will be included in the Interim Staff Report for consideration by Trustees

5 Why Tonight s Meeting? 5 The Challenges: Ministry funding for schools under 300 students Fewer student supports / resources Expected that schools will soon be allocated ½ principal Pupil Accommodation Review: St Michael overcrowding; substandard learning spaces St Paul under enrolled; site restrictions Boundary Review of Our Lady of Lourdes (St. Jamestown) The Opportunity: A new 3.47 acre school site at former Duke of York site $750M in Ministry funding over 4 years province wide for school boards carrying out school consolidations.

6 Status Quo - Existing Boundaries 6

7 Projected Enrolment 7 OUR LADY OF LOURDES OTG Status Quo: Pupil Count Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 85% 96% 105% 114% 118% 120% 120% 121% ST PAUL OTG Status Quo: Pupil Count Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 44% 39% 42% 42% 41% 40% 40% 41% ST MICHAEL OTG Status Quo: Pupil Count Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 179% 214% 248% 271% 294% 310% 328% 348% FORMER DUKE OF YORK SITE OTG Status Quo: Pupil Count Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

8 Staff Recommendation 8

9 Projected Enrolment 9 OUR LADY OF LOURDES OTG Status Quo: Pupil Count Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 85% 96% 105% 114% 118% 120% 120% 121% After Boundary Change: Pupil Count After Boundary Change: Rate of Utilization (%) 96% 106% 114% 118% 120% 121% 121% ST PAUL OTG Status Quo: Pupil Count Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 44% 39% 42% 42% 41% 40% 40% 41% After Boundary Change: Pupil Count After Boundary Change: Rate of Utilization (%) 82% 92% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% ST MICHAEL OTG Status Quo: Pupil Count Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 179% 214% 248% 271% 295% 310% 328% 348% After Boundary Change: Pupil Count After Boundary Change: Rate of Utilization (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Former Duke of York Site OTG Status Quo: Pupil Count Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 After Boundary Change: Pupil Count After Boundary Change: Rate of Utilization (%) 0% 0% 86% 89% 92% 95% 99%

10 ommittee Recommendation 10

11 Projected Enrolment 11 OUR LADY OF LOURDES OTG Status Quo: Pupil Count Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 85% 96% 105% 114% 118% 120% 120% 121% After Boundary Change: Pupil Count After Boundary Change: Rate of Utilization (%) 96% 106% 114% 117% 119% 119% 118% ST PAUL OTG Status Quo: Pupil Count Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 44% 39% 42% 42% 41% 40% 40% 41% After Boundary Change: Pupil Count After Boundary Change: Rate of Utilization (%) 82% 92% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% ST MICHAEL OTG Status Quo: Pupil Count Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 179% 214% 248% 271% 294% 310% 328% 348% After Boundary Change: Pupil Count After Boundary Change: Rate of Utilization (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% FORMER DUKE OF YORK SITE OTG Status Quo: Pupil Count Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% After Boundary Change: Pupil Count After Boundary Change: Rate of Utilization (%) 0% 0% 87% 90% 94% 98% 103%

12 Committee Recommended Solution 12 St Michael students moved to St Paul (September 2017) New Consolidated School at former Duke of York (Proposed 2021) Strong business case for the Ministry to fund a new school and keeps the entire 3.47 acres site for students (Jan. 24, 2017) School size: Child Care approx. 500 students / Full Service New school anticipated for September 2021 (assuming Ministry approval in early 2017)

13 A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words 13

14 Committee Asks for Inclusion in Staff Report to Trustees 14 St. Michael s move to St. Paul A Transition Plan be created to facilitate consolidation Financial support for the transition i.e. for the physical move, school community building events and sports uniforms Transportation to new school be provided in accordance with Policy Bussing be guaranteed to and from current daycare locations A Name for the school consolidation in accordance with the School Names S.07 policy. St. Michael s staff be placed in teaching positions at St. Paul s as per the Collective Agreement Evaluation and implementation of playground improvements at St. Paul s if permitted To integrate current Math programs Professional Development for St. Michael s staff members in order to effectively deliver the Math program offered at St. Paul s

15 Committee Asks Continued St. Paul (including St. Michael) to New School (Duke of York Site) 15 A Transition Plan be created to facilitate consolidation Transportation to new school be provided in accordance with Policy A new name for the new school be developed in accordance with the School Names S.07 policy (if it hasn t occurred) Opportunities for enhanced programming such as French Immersion, STEM and enhanced Music be assessed Physical Elements of New School Indoor Elements - Full stage, Dedicated science lab, Fine arts studio, Dedicated music room, Full double gym (not elementary modified), Gym convertible to archery range, Gymnastics gym, Boxing ring, Wood and metal shop, Ramps instead of stairs, "Third teacher" design ethos, Separate daycare entrance, Stroller parking area for daycare, Whiteboards, Lots of drinking fountains, Rest / lounge / meditation / prayer spaces. Outdoor Elements - Rooftop or underground parking, Outward-facing design layout, Turf field, Outdoor science space, Running track, Ample outdoor sports space, Outdoor basketball nets, Low rim basketball nets, Outdoor spaces useable in all weather conditions, Garden beds Technology - Digital media / computer lab, Recording studio, Built-in projectors, Full high speed wifi inside and outside, Power outlets everywhere Other Programs Full Service Child Care, Breakfast program

16 Next Steps In Process 16 Initial Staff Report Considered Trustees. Trustees make the decision to undertake an accommodation review, and the report is shared with public. (May 12, 2016) Interim Staff Report is considered by Trustees and shared with the public in advance of meeting. (Jan. 19, 2017) Accommodation Review Committee Meetings are held. (Oct. 5, Nov. 1, Nov. 15, Nov ) Public delegations are heard by Trustees. (Jan. 26, 2017) Public Meetings (Minimum 2 meetings). (Oct. 11, Dec. 7) Final Staff Report is considered by Trustees and shared with the public in advance of meeting. Trustees vote on final recommendation. (Feb 15, 2017) Committee and Community Feedback is Summarized and Considered.

17 Question & Answer