Why skills matter FURTHER RESULTS FROM THE SURVEY OF ADULT SKILLS

Transcription

1 Entretenir, renouveler et protéger le capital humain Paris, Sciences-Po 9 décembre 2016 Why skills matter FURTHER RESULTS FROM THE SURVEY OF ADULT SKILLS 1 Glenda QUINTINI Senior Economist, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs

2 Note regarding Cyprus Note by Turkey The information in this document with reference to Cyprus relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Turkey shall preserve its position concerning the Cyprus issue. Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.

3 L enquête d Évaluation des Compétences des Adultes 33 countries 215 thousand adults Representing 815 millions year-olds 24 countries in countries in 2015 Respondents with very low literacy skills were directed to a test of basic reading components Internationally agreed assessment in literacy, numeracy and problem solving in technologyrich environments The survey also collects a range of generic skills such as collaborating with others and organising one s time, required of individuals in their work.

4 Importance de la litératie sur le marché du travail et dans la vie quotidienne Percentage-point difference between Level 4 or 5 and Level 1 or below High levels of trust High levels of political efficacy Participation in volunteer activities High levels of health High wages

5 Compétences en litératie chez les adultes Japan Finland Netherlands Sweden Australia New Zealand Norway Estonia Russian Federation³ Slovak Republic Flanders (Belgium) Canada Czech Republic Denmark Korea England (UK) Germany OECD average United States Austria Poland Ireland Northern Ireland (UK) Singapore France Lithuania Cyprus¹ ² Israel Slovenia Spain Greece Italy Chile Turkey Jakarta (Indonesia) Level 2 Level 1 or below Level 3 Level 4/ Percentage of the population

6 Variation des compétences en litératie Interquartile range

7 Proportion des adultes avec de basses compétences en litératie et numératie Proportion of the population 90 At or below Level 1 in both literacy and numeracy in literacy only in numeracy only

8 Evolution de l emploi par professions définies par le niveau de compétences moyen % Occupations with highest average scores Occupations with next to highest average scores Occupations with next to lowest average scores Occupations with lowest average scores

9 Progrès en litératie entre générations to years Average year-olds UK Average year-olds US New Zealand Lithuania Germany France Chile Singapore Score

10 Litératie et niveau d éducation des parents 330 Neither parent has attained upper secondary At least one parent has attained tertiary

11 Litératie et immigration Native-born In host country 5 or fewer years In host country more than 5 years

12 Litératie par niveau d éducation (25-65 year olds): 330 Less than upper secondary Upper secondary Tertiary

13 Participation à la formation continue, par niveau de litératie (Adultes ans) % 100 Levels 4/5 Level 1 or below

14 Participation à la formation liée au travail, par niveau de litératie (Adultes ans) % 100 Levels 4/5 Level 1 and below

15 Utilisation des compétences au travail, par niveau de compétence Moyenne OCDE Reading at work Writing at work Numeracy at work Most frequent use = 5 4,5 Most frequent use = 5 4,5 Index of use 4,0 3,5 3,0 2,5 2,0 1,5 4,0 3,5 3,0 2,5 2,0 1,5 1,0 Level 1 or below Level 2 Level 3 Levels 4 and 5 1,0 Level 1 or below Level 2 Level 3 Levels 4 and 5 Literacy Numeracy Less frequent use = 1 Less frequent use = 1

16 Utilisation des compétences au travail et niveau de litératie des travailleurs Reading at work (left hand axis) Literacy proficiency (rigth hand axis) 3,5 350 Reading use at work 3,0 2,5 2, Proficiency in literacy score 1,5 150

17 Utilisation des compétences et organisation du travail Moyenne OCDE Most frequent use = 5 3,5 Work flexibility - Sequence of tasks Not at all Up to some extent To a high extent and more Most frequent use = 5 3,5 Sharing information with co-workers Never At least once a month At least once a week 3,0 3,0 2,5 2,5 2,0 2,0 1,5 1,5 1,0 Reading Writing Numeracy ICT at work Less frequent use = 1 Problem solving 1,0 Reading Writing Numeracy ICT at work Less frequent use = 1 Problem solving

18 Organisation du travail indice HPWP OCDE Moyenne 3,0 2,9 2,8 2,7 2,6 2,5 2,4 2,3 2,2 2,1 2,0

19 Find Out More About PIAAC at: All national and international publications The complete micro-level database Thank you