Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Transcription

1 Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE, SC 119 ARKANSAS NORTHEASTERN COLLEGE, AR 66 ASHLAND COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE, KY 737 BISHOP STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AL 68 BLACK HAWK COLLEGE, IL 48 BOSSIER PARISH COMMUNITY COLLEGE, LA 80 BURLINGTON COUNTY COLLEGE, NJ 60 COCHISE COLLEGE, AZ 352 COLLEGE OF COASTAL GEORGIA, GA 180 COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND, MD 141 COLUMBIA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 879 COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTY, THE, MD 107 COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF THE AIR FORCE, AL 395 CUMBERLAND COUNTY COLLEGE, NJ 66 DARTON COLLEGE, GA 662 DAYTONA STATE COLLEGE, FL 113 DEL MAR COLLEGE, TX 68 DELAWARE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, PA 31 EASTERN GATEWAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, OH 43 EASTERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE, WV 57 FLETCHER TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, LA 45 FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE AT JACKSONVILLE, FL 198 GLENDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AZ 371 GREENVILLE TECHNICAL COLLEGE, SC 323 JEFFERSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AL 89 JUDSON COLLEGE, AL 63 KANAWHA VALLEY COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE, WV 95 KASKASKIA COLLEGE, IL 31 KEISER UNIVERSITY, FL 89 LARAMIE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, WY 970 LDS BUSINESS COLLEGE, UT 226 MADISONVILLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, KY 211 MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NC 137 MCDOWELL TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NC 40 METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MO 164 MINERAL AREA COLLEGE, MO 1,158 MONTANA TECH OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA, MT 569 MONTCALM COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MI 51 MORGAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, CO 50 MOTLOW STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 876 MOTT COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MI 148 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

2 Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students MOUNT WACHUSETT COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MA 48 NATIONAL COLLEGE, VA 404 NAVARRO COLLEGE, TX 33 NORTH IOWA AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, IA 101 NORTHEAST STATE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,308 NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA A&M COLLEGE, OK 365 PALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE, FL 79 PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AZ 192 RARITAN VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NJ 34 ROANE STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 646 SAINT PHILIP'S COLLEGE, TX 116 SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE, FL 86 SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE, WV 303 SOUTHWEST TENNESSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,039 SOUTHWEST TEXAS JUNIOR COLLEGE, TX 114 ST. VINCENT'S COLLEGE, CT 181 SURRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NC 81 THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MO 397 UNION COUNTY COLLEGE, NJ 98 UNIVERSITY OF AKRON WAYNE COLLEGE, OH 59 VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, CA 83 VICTORIA COLLEGE, TX 36 VOLUNTEER STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,396 WALTERS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,508 WARREN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NJ 31 WESTERN WYOMING COMMUNITY COLLEGE, WY 429 YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE, GA 34 19,377 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

3 Distribution of Institutional Mean Total Scores Mean Number of Percent of Mean Number of Percent of Total Institutions Instns. Total Institutions Instns. Score Below Score Below 470 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Total Number of Institutions 68 Mean Std. Dev. 4.62

4 Distribution of Institutional Mean Subscores Skills Subscores Critical Thinking Reading Writing Math No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. Mean Subscore Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below 126 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Number of Institutions Mean Standard Deviation

5 Distribution of Institutional Mean Subscores (continued) Context-based Subscores Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. Mean Subscore Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below 126 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Number of Institutions Mean Standard Deviation

6 Distribution of Individual Students' Total Scores Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Score Below Score Below Score Below Score Below 500 > > > > > > > > > < < < No. of Students 17,398* 90th percentile 467 Mean th percentile 453 Standard Deviation th percentile th percentile th percentile 420 *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 900 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 900/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 1800 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 900/1800 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 900 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 1800 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 900 students.

7 Scaled Score Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Distribution of Individual Students' Subscores Skills Subscores: Percent of Students Below Each Scaled Score Critical Context-Based Subscores: Pct. of Students Below Each Scaled Score Social Natural Thinking Reading Writing Mathematics Humanities Sciences Sciences 130 >99 98 >99 >99 >99 >99 > >99 97 >99 >99 99 >99 > >99 94 > >99 > > <1 1 2 < <1 <1 1 <1 1 < <1 <1 1 <1 <1 < Number of Students 17,398* 17,398* 17,398* 17,398* 17,398* 17,398* 17,398* Mean Score Standard Deviation th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 900 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 900/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 1800 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 900/1800 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 900 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 1800 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 900 students.

8 Summary of Proficiency Classifications Percent of Students Classified as Skill Dimension and Level Not Proficient Marginal Proficient Critical Thinking 4% 17% 79% Reading, Level 2 33% 21% 46% Reading, Level 1 64% 21% 16% Writing, Level 3 5% 21% 74% Writing, Level 2 14% 35% 51% Writing, Level 1 57% 31% 12% Mathematics, Level 3 5% 12% 82% Mathematics, Level 2 22% 24% 54% Mathematics, Level 1 47% 29% 24% Total Number of Students: 19,377 Weighted Number of Students: 17,398* *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 900 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 900/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 1800 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 900/1800 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 900 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 1800 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 900 students.

9 Demographic Summary Percent in Category Unweighted data Weighted data* Demographic Category AGE Under 20 5% 5% 20 to 29 64% 64% 30 to 39 19% 19% 40 to 49 9% 9% 50 to 59 3% 3% 60 or more <1% <1% GENDER Male 36% 36% Female 64% 64% ETHNICITY American Indian/Alaskan Native 1% 1% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Is. 2% 2% African American 9% 9% Black Hispanic 1% 1% Hispanic 5% 6% Latin American 1% 1% White 78% 77% Other 3% 3% BEST LANGUAGE English 87% 87% Other Language 9% 9% Both Equal 3% 4% *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 900 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 900/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 1800 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 900/1800 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 900 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 1800 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 900 students.

10 Demographic Summary Percent in Category Unweighted data Weighted data* Demographic Category ENROLLMENT STATUS Full Time 71% 71% Part Time 29% 29% CREDIT HRS TRANSFERRED Not a Transfer 70% 71% 0-15 Hours Transferred 10% 10% Hours Transferred 8% 8% >30 Hours Transferred 11% 11% HOURS WORKED FOR WAGES None 23% 23% 1-15 Hours 17% 17% Hours 27% 27% >30 Hours 33% 33% CUMULATIVE GPA % 33% % 38% % 22% % 6% <1% <1% Less than 1.00 <1% <1% *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 900 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 900/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 1800 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 900/1800 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 900 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 1800 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 900 students.