INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL STUDIES PORTFOLIO RUBRIC. There is a brief description of social studies outcomes, but the number is less than required.
|
|
- Jerome Douglas
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Introduction to Social Portfolio INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL STUDIES PORTFOLIO RUBRIC Trait Unacceptable Beginning Developing Capable Accomplished Does not define the Vaguely defines the purpose of the social purpose of the social studies portfolio. studies portfolio. Adequately defines the purpose of the portfolio. Clearly and accurately delineates the purpose of the portfolio. Defines the purpose of the TWS portfolio in a professional and articulate manner. There is no description (or a very poor one) of the learning outcomes selected. There is a brief description of social studies outcomes, but the number is less than required. There is an acceptable description of learning outcomes. There is a specific description of the learning outcomes. There is an exemplary description of the social studies learning outcomes. There are no connections made between the TWS NCATE social studies elements and the College of Education Outcomes. The connections made between the NCSS elements of the TWS and the COE Outcomes are minimal The connections made between the NCSS social studies elements of the TWS and the COE Outcomes are satisfactory. The connections made between the NCSS social studies elements of the TWS and the College of Education Outcomes are clear. The connections made between the NCSS social studies elements of the TWS and the COE Outcomes are clear and focused. There is no description of the elements in the TWS portfolio organization. The description of the elements in the organization of the TWS portfolio is vague and not easily understood. The description of the elements in the TWS portfolio organization is acceptable. The description of elements in the TWS portfolio organization is logical and in format easy to understand. The description of the elements in the organization is excellent, well thought out, and logical.
2 SOCIAL STUDIES PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT RUBRIC Trait Unacceptable Beginning Developing Capable Accomplished Philosophy Statement Offers no evidence that the candidate has the student as the focus in the philosophy. Offers minimal candidate has the student as the focus in the philosophy. Offers adequate candidate has the student as the focus in the social studies philosophy. Offers significant candidate has the student as the focus of the social studies philosophy. Offers superior evidence that the candidate has the student as the focus social studies philosophy. Offers no evidence that the NCSS themes and SPECTRUM model are in the framework Offers minimal NCSS themes and SPECTRUM model are in the framework. Offers adequate NCSS themes and NCATE SPECTRUM model are in the framework. Offers significant NCSS thematic standards and NCATE SPECTRUM model, k, s, v & d, are in the framework. Offers superior evidence that the NCSS thematic standards and NCATE SPECTRUM model k, s, v & d are in the framework. Offers no evidence that the candidate understands social studies theory and research. Offers minimal candidate understands social studies theory and research. Offers adequate candidate understands social studies theory and research. Offers significant candidate understands social studies theory and research. Offers superior evidence that the candidate understands theory and research. Offers no evidence that the candidate has gained insight into teaching and learning through field experiences and coursework. Offers minimal candidate has gained insight into social studies teaching and learning through field experiences and coursework. Offers adequate candidate has gained insight into teaching and learning through field experiences Offers significant candidate has gained insight into teaching and learning through field experiences Offers superior evidence that the candidate has gained insight into social studies teaching and learning through field experiences and coursework.
3 and coursework. and coursework.
4 Knowledge of Community, School and Classroom Factors Contextual Factors Rubric TWS Standard: The teacher uses information about the learning/teaching context and student individual differences to set learning goals, plan instruction and assess learning. Rating Score Indicator Unacceptable Beginning Developing Capable Accomplished Displays no social studies knowledge of the characteristics of the community, school, and classroom. Knowledge of Characteristics of Students Knowledge of Students Varied Social Approaches to Learning Knowledge of Students Skills and Prior Social Displays no social studies knowledge of student differences (e.g., development, interests, culture, abilities/disabilities). Fails to demonstrate understanding of a variety of social studies approaches to learning among students, e.g., multiple intelligences and/or learning modalities. Displays no knowledge of students skills and previous Displays minimal, irrelevant, or biased knowledge of the characteristics of the community, school, and classroom. Displays minimal, stereotypical, or irrelevant knowledge of student differences (e.g., development, interests, culture, abilities/disabilities). Demonstrates general understanding of a variety of approaches to learning among students and may know one or two learning modalities but not a variety. Identifies the value of understanding students skills and previous learning but Displays some social studies knowledge of the characteristics of the community, school, and classroom that may affect learning. Displays general knowledge of student differences (e.g., development, interests, culture, abilities/disabilities). Demonstrates general understanding of a variety of social studies approaches to learning among students and can distinguish between multiple modalities. Identifies the value of understanding students social studies skills and Displays a comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of the community, school, and classroom that may affect learning. Displays general and specific social studies knowledge of student differences (e.g., development, interests, culture, abilities/disabilities). Articulates an understanding of varied learning modalities and multiple intelligences. Displays knowledge of understanding students social studies skills and Displays and explains an in-depth social studies understanding of the characteristics of the community, school, and classroom that may affect learning with specific data, cited sources, and/or statistics. Displays and explains in-depth knowledge of student differences (e.g., development, interests, culture, abilities/disabilities). Articulates general and specific understanding of varied learning modalities and multiple intelligences. Articulates an indepth understanding of students social studies skills and
5 Learning Implications for Social Instructional Planning and Assessment learning and does not indicate either is important. Does not provide implications for social studies instruction and assessment based on student individual differences and community, school, and classroom characteristics or provides inappropriate implications. demonstrates its importance for the whole class only. Provides minimal implications for social studies instruction and assessment based on student individual differences and community, school, and classroom characteristics or provides inappropriate implications. previous learning for the group and individuals. Provides general implications for instruction and assessment based on student individual differences and community, school, or classroom characteristics. previous learning, including special needs students. Provides specific implications for instruction and assessment based on student individual differences and community, school, and classroom characteristics. previous learning for the group and individuals including special needs students. Provides specific implications and analyzes decisions for instruction and assessment based on student individual differences (ELL and inclusion students) and community, school, and classroom characteristics.
6 Learning Goals Rubric TWS Standard: The teacher sets significant, challenging, varied and appropriate learning goals. Rating Indicator Significance, Challenge and Variety of Social Goals Clarity of Social Goals Appropriateness of Goals for Students Alignment of Social Goals with National, State or Local Standards 1 Unacceptable goals are not in evidence. goals are vague or not in evidence. goals presented are inappropriate for the class or set unrealistic expectations for students. Fails to develop goals aligned with national, NJCCCS and COE standards 2 Beginning goals reflect only one type or level of learning goals are not stated clearly and are activities rather than learning outcomes. goals are not developmentally appropriate; nor address pre-requisite knowledge, skills, experiences, or other student needs. goals are not aligned with NCSS thematic standards, NJCCCS or COE standards. 3 Developing goals reflect several types or levels of learning but lack significance or challenge Some of the social studies goals are clearly stated as learning outcomes. Some goals are developmentally appropriate and address some prerequisite knowledge, skills, experiences, and other student needs. Some goals are aligned with NCSS thematic standards, NJCCCS or COE standards. 4 Capable goals reflect several types or levels of learning and are significant and challenging. Most of the social studies goals are clearly stated as learning outcomes Most goals are developmentally appropriate; addresses prerequisite knowledge, skills, experiences and other student needs are considered. Most of the social studies goals are explicitly aligned with NCSS thematic standards, NJCCCS and COE standards. 5 Accomplished goals are significant and challenge thought and expectations including three or more levels and types. goals are clearly stated in behavioral terms. goals demonstrate realistic expectations for all students in addition to providing for students critical thinking and reflection. goals are aligned with NCSS thematic standards, NJCCCS, COE standards and are articulated through the lesson presentations. Score
7 Alignments are explained.
8 Assessment Plan Rubric TWS Standard: The teacher sets significant, challenging, varied and appropriate learning goals. Rating Indicator Alignment with Social Learning Goals and Instruction Clarity of Criteria and Standards for Performance Multiple Modes and Approaches For Social Assessment 1 Unacceptable Minimal plans for pre and post assessments are provided; assessments do not measure learning goals. The assessments contain no criteria for measuring student performance relative to the learning goals. The assessment plan fails to demonstrate evidence of student assessment other than after instructions. Limited social studies 2 Beginning NJCCCS content and methods of assessment lack congruence with learning goals or lack cognitive complexity. assessments contain poorly stated criteria for measuring student performance leading to student confusion. The assessment plan includes only one assessment mode and does not assess students before, during, and after instruction. 3 Developing Some of the learning goals are assessed through the assessment plan, but many are not congruent with NJCCCS learning goals in content and cognitive complexity. Assessment criteria have been developed, but they are not clear or are not explicitly linked to the learning goals. The assessment plan includes multiple modes but all are either pencil/paper based (i.e., they are not performance assessments) and/or do not require the integration of knowledge, skills and critical thinking. 4 Capable The NJCCCS & the learning goals are assessed through the assessment plan; assessments are congruent with the learning goals in content and cognitive complexity. Assessment criteria are clear and are explicitly linked to the social studies learning goals. The assessment plan includes multiple assessment modes (including performance assessments, lab reports, research projects, etc.) and assesses student performance throughout the instructional sequence. 5 Accomplished All NJCCCS & the learning goals are assessed by the assessment plan, and provide students with constructive feedback on their learning. Assessment criteria are linked to social studies learning goals; accurately documenting student social studies learning. The assessment plan uses formal/informal assessments and student s selfassessments to assess student performance and effectiveness of the Score
9 Technical Soundness Of Social Assessments Adaptations Based on the Individual Needs of Social Students knowledge of formal/informal assessments assessments are not designed to measure lessons goals and objectives; scoring procedures are inaccurate. teacher does not address or link assessments to identified contextual factors. assessments are not valid; scoring procedures are inaccurate; items or prompts are poorly written; directions and procedures are confusing to students. teacher does not adapt social studies assessments to meet the individual needs of students or these assessments are inappropriate. assessments appear to have some validity. Some scoring procedures are explained; some items or prompts are clearly written; some directions and procedures are clear to students teacher makes adaptations to assessments that are appropriate to meet the individual needs of some students. assessments appear to be valid; scoring procedures are explained; most items or prompts are clearly written; directions and procedures are clear to students. teacher makes adaptations to assessments that are appropriate to meet the individual needs of most students. instructional sequence. assessments appear to be valid and clearly written. Assessments data used to document students strengths as well as opportunities for learning. teacher s adaptations of assessments for all students needs to be met. Adaptations are creative and show evidence of outstanding social studies problemsolving skills by teacher candidate.
10 Design for Instruction Rubric TWS Standard: The teacher designs instruction for specific learning goals, student characteristics and needs, and learning contexts. Rating Indicator 1 Unacceptable 2 Beginning 3 Developing 4 Capable 5 Accomplished No lesson is Few lessons are Most lessons are All lessons are All lessons are linked to the explicitly linked to the explicitly linked to the explicitly linked to the explicitly linked to NJCCCS, NJCCCS, NCSS themes NJCCCS, NCSS NJCCCS, NCSS the NJCCCS, NCSS NCSS themes or a themes or themes or themes or social Alignment or a social learning goal. Few learning goals. Most learning goals. All studies learning with learning learning activities, learning activities, learning activities, goals and goal. No assignments and assignments and assignments and demonstrate critical Learning learning resources are aligned resources are aligned resources are aligned thinking and Goals activities are with with with reflection in aligned to social learning goals. Not all learning goals. Most learning goals. All activities and studies learning learning learning learning assignments. goals. goals are covered in the goals are covered in the goals are covered in the Accurate Representation of Social Content Lesson and Unit Structure Teacher does not demonstrate purpose and relevancy of NJCCCS social studies content. The social studies lessons within the unit do not demonstrate knowledge of how social design. Teacher s use of NJCCCS content appears to contain numerous inaccuracies. Social studies content seems to be viewed more as isolated skills and facts rather than as part of a larger conceptual structure. The lessons within the unit are not logically organized (e.g., sequenced). design. Teacher s use of NJCCCS content appears to be mostly accurate. Shows some awareness of the big ideas or structure of the social studies discipline. The lessons within the unit have some logical organization and appear to be somewhat useful in moving students toward design. Teacher s use of NJCCCS content appears to be accurate. Focus of the content is congruent with the big ideas or structure of the discipline. Most lessons within the unit are logically organized and appear to be useful in moving students toward achieving the learning Teacher provides NJCCCS interdisciplinary cross- content approach to student learning, stressing depth and breadth of social studies content. All lessons within the unit demonstrate how knowledge of NJCCCS social studies content is created and Score
11 Use of a Variety of Activities, Assignments and Resources For Social Instruction Use of Contextual Information and Data to Select Appropriate and Relevant Activities, Assignments and Resources Use of Technology to Teach Social studies content is created and developed. A single social studies instructional modality is used with social studies textbook as only reference. instruction has not been based upon knowledge of subject matter, students or preassessment data. teacher does not use technology during social studies instruction. Little variety of social studies instructional activities, assignments, and resources. Heavy reliance on textbook or single resource (e.g., work sheets). instruction has been designed with very limited reference to contextual factors and pre-assessment data. activities and assignments do not appear productive and appropriate for each student. Technology is inappropriately used in lesson and inappropriate rationale is provided. achieving the social studies learning goals. Some variety in social studies instruction, activities, assignments, or resources but with limited contribution to learning. Some instruction has been designed with reference to contextual factors and preassessment data. Some activities and assignments appear productive and appropriate for each student. teacher uses technology but it does not make a significant contribution to teaching and learning or teacher provides limited rationale for not using technology. goals. Significant variety across the social studies curriculum instruction, activities, assignments, and/or resources. This variety makes a clear contribution to social studies learning. Most instruction has been designed with reference to contextual factors and preassessment data. Most activities and assignments appear productive and appropriate for each student. teacher integrates appropriate technology that makes a significant contribution to teaching and learning or provides a strong rationale for not using technology. organized and integrates knowledge from other fields of content. instructional strategic assignments are varied to accommodate individual learners and to achieve social studies lesson goals. All instruction addresses the diverse needs of individual students and contextual factors of community, school and class. teacher integrates a variety of media and technology into instruction and relates both directly to lesson goals.
12 Instructional Decision-Making Rubric TWS Standard: The teacher uses on-going analysis of student learning to make instructional decisions. Rating Indicator Sound Professional Practice Modifications Based on Analysis of Student Social Learning Congruence Between Modifications and Social Learning Goals 1 Unacceptable instructional decisions are inappropriate for age of student, content, and community. teacher treats class as one plan fits all with no modifications. Fails to demonstrate evidence of instructional modifications. Inappropriate modification in instruction. 2 Beginning Many instructional decisions are inappropriate and not pedagogically sound. Limited modifications of the instructional plan have been made, to accommodate individual learners. Modifications in social studies instruction lack congruence with social studies learning goals. 3 Developing instructional decisions are mostly appropriate, but some decisions are not pedagogically sound. Some modifications of the instructional plan are made to address individual student needs, but these are not based on the analysis of student learning, best practice, or contextual factors. Modifications in social studies instruction are somewhat congruent with learning goals. 4 Capable Most instructional decisions are pedagogically sound (i.e., they are likely to lead to student learning). Appropriate modifications of the instructional plan are made to address individual student needs. These modifications are informed by the analysis of student learning/performance, best practice, or contextual factors. Modifications in social studies instruction are congruent with social studies learning goals. 5 Accomplished Most social studies instructional decisions are pedagogically sound and build on concepts and skills previously learned. Appropriate modifications of the plan are made to individualize instruction. Rational to improve student progress is provided. Modifications in instruction are congruent with learning goals Score
13 and cite current research as the rationale for the modifications. Analysis of Student Learning Rubric TWS Standard: The teacher uses assessment data to profile student learning and communicate information about student progress and achievement. Rating Indicator Clarity and Accuracy of Designed Presentation Alignment with Social Learning Goals Interpretation of Social Student Data 1 Unacceptable presentation does not include data. Neither analysis of student learning nor visual representation is aligned with social studies learning goals. Interpretation of social studies student data is unsupported by any relevant data 2 Beginning presentation is not clear and accurate; it does not accurately reflect the data. Analysis of student learning is aligned with learning goals. Visual representations do not include whole class, sub-groups or individual students. Interpretation of student data is inaccurate, and conclusions are 3 Developing Social studied presentation is understandable and contains few errors. Analysis of student learning is general with learning goals and/or fails to provide a comprehensive profile of student learning relative to the goals for the whole class, subgroups, and two individuals. Interpretation of student data is technically accurate, but 4 Capable presentation is easy to understand and contains no errors of presentation. Analysis is fully aligned with social studies learning goals and provides a comprehensive profile of student learning for the whole class, subgroups, and two individuals. Interpretation of student data is meaningful, and appropriate 5 Accomplished Contains no errors in presentation. Social studies Presentation is communicated with the use of technology and media. Analysis is thorough and complete, recognizing student progress in developing content proficiency. Visual and narrative summaries demonstrate the extent of student progress. Interpretation of social studies student data is comprehensive. Appropriate Score
14 Evidence of Impact on Student Learning Analysis is weak and fails to provide subgroup achievement of learning. missing. Analysis of student learning fails to include evidence of impact on student learning in terms of numbers of students who achieved and made progress toward learning goals. No remediation is provided. conclusions are missing or not fully supported by data. Analysis of student learning includes incomplete evidence of the impact on student learning in terms of numbers of students who achieved and made progress toward learning goals. Limited remediation is provided. conclusions are drawn from the data. Analysis of student learning includes evidence of the impact on student learning in terms of number of students who achieved and made progress toward each social studies learning goal. Remediation is specific. conclusions are drawn from the data. Candidate has detailed the assessment and evaluation of student gains. A thorough analysis of the learning gains of all students and subgroups is presented. Remediation is specific.
15 Reflection and Self-Evaluation Rubric TWS Standard: The teacher analyzes the relationship between his or her instruction and student learning in order to improve teaching practice. Rating Indicator 1 Unacceptable 2 Beginning 3 Developing 4 Capable 5 Accomplished Interpretation of Student Learning Insights on Effective Instruction and Assessment Alignment Among Social Goals, Instruction and Assessment No evidence or reasons provided to support conclusions drawn in Analysis of Student Social Learning section. Provides no rationale for why some activities or assessments were more successful than others. Does not connect NJCCCS social studies learning goals, instruction, and assessment results in the Provides one possible reason as evidence to support conclusions drawn in Analysis of Student Social Learning. Rationale for social studies activities or assessments presented in confusing manner; insights limited to knowledge-based instruction and use of formal assessments. Connections among NJCCCS social studies learning goals, instructions and assessments are irrelevant or Provides evidence but simplistic, superficial reasons are given or hypotheses to support conclusions drawn in Analysis of Student Learning section. Identifies successful and unsuccessful social studies activities or assessments and superficially explores reasons for their success or lack thereof (no use of theory or research). Connects NJCCCS learning goals, instructions, and assessment results in the discussion of student Uses evidence to support conclusions drawn in Analysis of Student Social Learning section. Identifies successful and unsuccessful activities and assessments and provides plausible reasons (based on theory or research) for their success or lack thereof. Logically connects NJCCCS social studies learning goals, instruction, and assessment results in the discussion of Uses evidence to support more than four conclusions drawn in Analysis of Student Learning section. Explores multiple hypotheses for why some students did and others did not meet learning goals. Reflects on own performance as a teacher focusing on the impact of the experience on student learning. Current research findings are incorporated as supportive documentation. Connects NJCCCS learning goals, instruction and assessment results in the discussion of student Score
16 discussion of student learning and effective instruction and/or the connections are irrelevant or inaccurate. inaccurate. learning and effective instruction, but misunderstandings or conceptual gaps are present. student learning and effective instruction. learning and effective instruction. Current research findings are incorporated as supportive documentation. Implications for Future Teaching Implications for Social Professional Development Provides no ideas or inappropriate ideas for redesigning social studies learning goals, instruction, and assessment. Provides no professional social studies learning goals. Provides limited ideas for redesigning learning goals, instruction, and assessment. Rationale is inadequate; or absent. Provides social studies goals that are not related to the insights and experiences described in this section. Provides ideas for redesigning social studies learning goals, instruction, and assessment but offers no rationale for why these changes would improve student social studies learning. Presents professional learning goals that are not strongly related to the insights and experiences described in this section and/or provides a vague plan for meeting the social studies goals. Provides ideas for redesigning social studies learning goals, instruction, and assessment and explains why these modifications would improve student learning. Presents professional learning goals that emerge from the insights and experiences descried in this section. Provides a repertoire of strategies, offering specific alternative actions complete with probable successes for student learning. Presents four or more professional social studies learning goals that clearly emerge from the insights and experiences described in this section. Describes at least two specific steps to meet these goals
17 Writing Mechanics and Organization Rubric Standard: TWS Portfolio is organized clearly, grammatically correct and written in standard English. Trait 1 Unacceptable 2 Beginning 3 Developing 4 Capable 5 Accomplished Writing Mechanics The use of standard written English is unsatisfactory at this level. More than 10 errors in punctuation, capitalization, subject-verb agreement may exist or excessive fragments or run-ons may detract from the overall content of the writing. The use of standard written English needs attention. More than 9 errors in punctuation, capitalization, subject-verb agreement may exist or 2 or more fragments or run-ons may exist in social studies writing. The use of standard written English is adequate with no more than 8 errors in punctuation, capitalization, subject-verb agreement may exist or 1 or more fragments or run-ons may exist in social studies writing. The use of standard written English is good with no more than 5 errors in social studies writing. The use of standard written English is outstanding with no more than 2 errors in punctuation, capitalization, subjectverb agreement may exist in writing. No fragments or run-ons may exist Use of Syntax in Social Writing Syntax and word choice may be unsatisfactory, or the writing may lack cohesion in social studies writing. Syntax and word choice may need attention, or the writing may lack cohesion in social studies writing. Syntax and word choice are satisfactory, and the writing is cohesive. Syntax and word choice are appropriate, and the writing is cohesive. Syntax and word choice are clearly superior, and the writing is very cohesive.
Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.
Adolescence and Young Adulthood SOCIAL STUDIES HISTORY For retake candidates who began the Certification process in 2013-14 and earlier. Part 1 provides you with the tools to understand and interpret your
More informationDeveloping an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning
Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning By Peggy L. Maki, Senior Scholar, Assessing for Learning American Association for Higher Education (pre-publication version of article that
More informationFacing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text
Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text by Barbara Goggans Students in 6th grade have been reading and analyzing characters in short stories such as "The Ravine," by Graham
More informationTRAITS OF GOOD WRITING
TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING Each paper was scored on a scale of - on the following traits of good writing: Ideas and Content: Organization: Voice: Word Choice: Sentence Fluency: Conventions: The ideas are clear,
More informationRubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis
FYE Program at Marquette University Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis Writing Conventions INTEGRATING SOURCE MATERIAL 3 Proficient Outcome Effectively expresses purpose in the introduction
More informationMYP Language A Course Outline Year 3
Course Description: The fundamental piece to learning, thinking, communicating, and reflecting is language. Language A seeks to further develop six key skill areas: listening, speaking, reading, writing,
More informationEnglish 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11
English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School Literacy Story and Analysis through Critical Lens Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11 Part 1: Story
More informationKENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING
KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING With Specialist Frameworks for Other Professionals To be used for the pilot of the Other Professional Growth and Effectiveness System ONLY! School Library Media Specialists
More informationSecondary English-Language Arts
Secondary English-Language Arts Assessment Handbook January 2013 edtpa_secela_01 edtpa stems from a twenty-five-year history of developing performance-based assessments of teaching quality and effectiveness.
More informationEQuIP Review Feedback
EQuIP Review Feedback Lesson/Unit Name: On the Rainy River and The Red Convertible (Module 4, Unit 1) Content Area: English language arts Grade Level: 11 Dimension I Alignment to the Depth of the CCSS
More informationArkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio
Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio Guidelines, Rubrics, and Requirements 2 THE EXIT PORTFOLIO A s-based Presentation of Evidence for the Licensure of Beginning Teachers Purpose:
More informationNovember 2012 MUET (800)
November 2012 MUET (800) OVERALL PERFORMANCE A total of 75 589 candidates took the November 2012 MUET. The performance of candidates for each paper, 800/1 Listening, 800/2 Speaking, 800/3 Reading and 800/4
More informationWith guidance, use images of a relevant/suggested. Research a
Learning Focus/Criteria Emerging Developing Evolving AO1 DEVELOP AND INVESTIGATE Develop ideas through investigations inforstudentd by contextual and other sources, demonstrating analytical and cultural
More informationAdolescence and Young Adulthood / English Language Arts. Component 1: Content Knowledge SAMPLE ITEMS AND SCORING RUBRICS
Adolescence and Young Adulthood / English Language Arts Component 1: Content Knowledge SAMPLE ITEMS AND SCORING RUBRICS Prepared by Pearson for submission under contract with the National Board for Professional
More informationPAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))
Ohio Academic Content Standards Grade Level Indicators (Grade 11) A. ACQUISITION OF VOCABULARY Students acquire vocabulary through exposure to language-rich situations, such as reading books and other
More informationUIMN Preparing for Intercultural Ministry (3 hours) Fall 2015 MW 11:00 WM 122
Dan Burton dan.burton@ccuniversity.edu (513) 244-8167 Office: Lower Level of Presidents Hall UIMN 330 - Preparing for Intercultural Ministry (3 hours) Fall 2015 MW 11:00 12:15 @ WM 122 Description A study
More informationArizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS
Arizona s English Language Arts Standards 11-12th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS 11 th -12 th Grade Overview Arizona s English Language Arts Standards work together
More informationSectionalism Prior to the Civil War
Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War GRADE 7 This sample task contains a set of primary and authentic sources about how the differences between the North and South deepened the feelings of sectionalism
More informationScoring Notes for Secondary Social Studies CBAs (Grades 6 12)
Scoring Notes for Secondary Social Studies CBAs (Grades 6 12) The following rules apply when scoring any of the Social Studies Classroom Based Assessments (CBAs) for grades 6 12. 1. Position: All CBA responses
More informationWriting for the AP U.S. History Exam
Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam Answering Short-Answer Questions, Writing Long Essays and Document-Based Essays James L. Smith This page is intentionally blank. Two Types of Argumentative Writing
More informationAssessment. the international training and education center on hiv. Continued on page 4
the international training and education center on hiv I-TECH Approach to Curriculum Development: The ADDIE Framework Assessment I-TECH utilizes the ADDIE model of instructional design as the guiding framework
More informationThe College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12
A Correlation of, 2017 To the Redesigned SAT Introduction This document demonstrates how myperspectives English Language Arts meets the Reading, Writing and Language and Essay Domains of Redesigned SAT.
More informationMidterm Evaluation of Student Teachers
Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers Please complete and return form to the EKU student teaching supervisor on or before midterm week Student Teacher EKU ID # Subject/ Grade(s) Cooperating Teacher s
More informationIndiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process
Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning ICPBL Certification mission is to PBL Certification Process ICPBL Processing Center c/o CELL 1400 East Hanna Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46227 (317) 791-5702
More informationSPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM (Revised 11/2014) 1 Fern Ridge Schools Specialist Performance Review and Evaluation System TABLE OF CONTENTS Timeline of Teacher Evaluation and Observations
More informationStatistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics
5/22/2012 Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics College of Menominee Nation & University of Wisconsin
More informationEDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools
1 INDIANA UNIVERSITY NORTHWEST School of Education EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools Time: Monday 9 a.m. to 3:45 Place: Instructor: Matthew Benus, Ph.D. Office: Hawthorn Hall 337 E-mail: mbenus@iun.edu
More informationASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE
ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE March 28, 2002 Prepared by the Writing Intensive General Education Category Course Instructor Group Table of Contents Section Page
More information1. Answer the questions below on the Lesson Planning Response Document.
Module for Lateral Entry Teachers Lesson Planning Introductory Information about Understanding by Design (UbD) (Sources: Wiggins, G. & McTighte, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.;
More informationAssessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)
Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011) Health professions education programs - Conceptual framework The University of Rochester interdisciplinary program in Health Professions
More informationGeorge Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education
George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education 1 EDSE 590: Research Methods in Special Education Instructor: Margo A. Mastropieri, Ph.D. Assistant: Judy Ericksen Section
More informationWest Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA
Georgia Teacher Academy for Preparation and Pedagogy Pathways to Certification West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA 20220 770-583-2528 www.westgaresa.org 1 Georgia s Teacher Academy Preparation
More informationStudent Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore
Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore 1 Welcome to the Certificate in Medical Teaching programme 2016 at the University of Health Sciences, Lahore. This programme is for teachers
More informationSt. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy
St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy The School s Approach to Marking and Feedback At St. Martin s School we believe that feedback, in both written and verbal form, is an integral part of the learning
More informationCommon Performance Task Data
Common Performance Task Data 2012-201 Standard.1-Visionary Leadership Common Performance Task: Written articulation of candidate s vision of an effective school, including a) The beliefs and values upon
More informationFinal Teach For America Interim Certification Program
Teach For America Interim Certification Program Program Rubric Overview The Teach For America (TFA) Interim Certification Program Rubric was designed to provide formative and summative feedback to TFA
More informationEvidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests
Compendium Study Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests Susan Hines January 2010 Based on preliminary market data collected by ETS in 2004 from the TOEIC test score users (e.g.,
More informationYMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN
YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN (normal view is landscape, not portrait) SCHOOL AGE DOMAIN SKILLS ARE SOCIAL: COMMUNICATION, LANGUAGE AND LITERACY: EMOTIONAL: COGNITIVE: PHYSICAL: DEVELOPMENTAL
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide for Administrators (Assistant Principals) Guide for Evaluating Assistant Principals Revised August
More informationTUCSON CAMPUS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS SYLLABUS
TUCSON CAMPUS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS SYLLABUS 1. Mission Statement: Wayland Baptist University exists to educate students in an academically challenging, learningfocused and distinctively Christian environment
More informationOakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus
Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus For Secondary Schools The attached course syllabus is a developmental and integrated approach to skill acquisition throughout the
More informationSouth Carolina English Language Arts
South Carolina English Language Arts A S O F J U N E 2 0, 2 0 1 0, T H I S S TAT E H A D A D O P T E D T H E CO M M O N CO R E S TAT E S TA N DA R D S. DOCUMENTS REVIEWED South Carolina Academic Content
More informationGuidelines for Writing an Internship Report
Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report Master of Commerce (MCOM) Program Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 1. Introduction.... 3 2. The Required Components
More informationAnalyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs
Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs 2016 Dual Language Conference: Making Connections Between Policy and Practice March 19, 2016 Framingham, MA Session Description
More informationACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES Section 8: General Education Title: General Education Assessment Guidelines Number (Current Format) Number (Prior Format) Date Last Revised 8.7 XIV 09/2017 Reference: BOR Policy
More informationPEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)
PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12) Standard I.* Standard II.* Standard III.* Standard IV. The teacher designs instruction appropriate for all students that reflects an understanding
More informationTAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY
TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY By Robin L. Elledge Steven L. Phillips, Ph.D. QUESTIONNAIRE & SCORING BOOKLET Name: Date: By Robin L. Elledge Steven L. Phillips, Ph.D. OVERVIEW The Team Assessment Inventory
More informationeportfolio Guide Missouri State University
Social Studies eportfolio Guide Missouri State University Updated February 2014 Missouri State Portfolio Guide MoSPE & Conceptual Framework Standards QUALITY INDICATORS MoSPE 1: Content Knowledge Aligned
More informationMathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005
Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005 Grade 4 Contents Strand and Performance Indicator Map with Answer Key...................... 2 Holistic Rubrics.......................................................
More informationSmarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics October 2015 Target 1 Narrative (Organization Opening) provides an adequate opening or introduction to the narrative that may establish setting
More informationGraduate Program in Education
SPECIAL EDUCATION THESIS/PROJECT AND SEMINAR (EDME 531-01) SPRING / 2015 Professor: Janet DeRosa, D.Ed. Course Dates: January 11 to May 9, 2015 Phone: 717-258-5389 (home) Office hours: Tuesday evenings
More informationCHEM 591 Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry
Washington State University MAJOR CURRICULAR CHANGE FORM - - NEW/RESTORE COURSE Please attach rationale for your request, a complete syllabus, and explain how this impacts other units in Pullman and other
More informationContent Teaching Methods: Social Studies. Dr. Melinda Butler
Content Teaching Methods: Social Studies ED 456 P60 2 Credits Dr. Melinda Butler (208) 292-1288 office (208) 666-6712 fax (208) 771-3703 cell Email: mkbutler@lcsc.edu or butlerm2@mac.com Course Description:
More informationWebQuest - Student Web Page
WebQuest - Student Web Page On the Home Front WW2 A WebQuest for Grade 9 American History Allyson Ayres - May 15, 2014 Children pointing at movie poster for Uncle Sam at Work at the Auditorium Theater
More informationTeachers Guide Chair Study
Certificate of Initial Mastery Task Booklet 2006-2007 School Year Teachers Guide Chair Study Dance Modified On-Demand Task Revised 4-19-07 Central Falls Johnston Middletown West Warwick Coventry Lincoln
More informationProfessional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index
Domain 3: Instruction Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index Courses included in the Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition related to Domain 3 of the Framework for
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide (Revised) for Teachers Updated August 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction to DPAS II Purpose of
More informationCEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales
CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency s CEFR CEFR OVERALL ORAL PRODUCTION Has a good command of idiomatic expressions and colloquialisms with awareness of connotative levels of meaning. Can convey
More informationKentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations
Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning Included in this section are the: Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations Kentucky New Teacher Standards (Note: For your reference, the KDE website
More informationGeorgetown University School of Continuing Studies Master of Professional Studies in Human Resources Management Course Syllabus Summer 2014
Georgetown University School of Continuing Studies Master of Professional Studies in Human Resources Management Course Syllabus Summer 2014 Course: Class Time: Location: Instructor: Office: Office Hours:
More informationFOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)
FOR TEACHERS ONLY The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION CCE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core) Wednesday, June 14, 2017 9:15 a.m. to 12:15 p.m., only SCORING KEY AND
More informationCommon Core State Standards for English Language Arts
Reading Standards for Literature 6-12 Grade 9-10 Students: 1. Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. 2.
More informationRED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education
RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education Table of Contents Curriculum Background...5 Catalog Description of Course...5
More informationHighlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson
English Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson About this Lesson Annotating a text can be a permanent record of the reader s intellectual conversation with a text. Annotation can help a reader
More informationMaintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus
Course Description This course is designed to help K-12 teachers navigate the ever-growing complexities of the education profession while simultaneously helping them to balance their lives and careers.
More informationCARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC
CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC Student Name: Date: Evaluator Chair: Additional Evaluators: This rubric is designed to evaluate the whole of the Caritas Project from start to finish. This should be used
More informationCELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom
CELTA Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines Third Edition CELTA (Certificate in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages) is accredited by Ofqual (the regulator of qualifications, examinations and
More informationMASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE
MASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE University of Amsterdam Graduate School of Communication Kloveniersburgwal 48 1012 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands E-mail address: scripties-cw-fmg@uva.nl
More informationASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY The assessment of student learning begins with educational values. Assessment is not an end in itself but a vehicle
More informationA Guide to Student Portfolios
A Guide to Student Portfolios School Counseling Program Department of Counseling & School Psychology Southern Connecticut State University Revised 2/28/12 Contents Portfolios The Basics... 3 A Portfolio
More informationThe Paradox of Structure: What is the Appropriate Amount of Structure for Course Assignments with Regard to Students Problem-Solving Styles?
The Paradox of Structure: What is the Appropriate Amount of Structure for Course Assignments with Regard to Students 59 th Annual NACTA Conference Virginia Tech June, 2013 Curt Friedel Megan Seibel Introduction
More informationProgram Report for the Preparation of Journalism Teachers
Program Report for the Preparation of Journalism Teachers Section I--Context 1. Description of any state or institutional policies that may influence the application of SPA standards. The Journalism certification
More informationAchievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition
Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition Georgia Department of Education September 2015 All Rights Reserved Achievement Levels and Achievement Level Descriptors With the implementation
More informationACCREDITATION STANDARDS
ACCREDITATION STANDARDS Description of the Profession Interpretation is the art and science of receiving a message from one language and rendering it into another. It involves the appropriate transfer
More informationeportfolio Assessment of General Education
eportfolio Assessment of General Education Pages from the eportfolios of Matthew Potts and Adam Eli Spikell. Used with Permission. Table of Contents Section Page Methods 2 Results--Quantitative Literacy
More informationBe aware there will be a makeup date for missed class time on the Thanksgiving holiday. This will be discussed in class. Course Description
HDCN 6303-METHODS: GROUP COUNSELING Department of Counseling and Dispute Resolution Southern Methodist University Thursday 6pm 10:15pm Jan Term 2013-14 Be aware there will be a makeup date for missed class
More informationContract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)
Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4) Evidence Used in Evaluation Rubric (5) Evaluation Cycle: Training (6) Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation (7) Evaluation Cycle:
More informationThis Performance Standards include four major components. They are
Environmental Physics Standards The Georgia Performance Standards are designed to provide students with the knowledge and skills for proficiency in science. The Project 2061 s Benchmarks for Science Literacy
More informationEarl of March SS Physical and Health Education Grade 11 Summative Project (15%)
Earl of March SS Physical and Health Education Grade 11 Summative Project (15%) Student Name: PPL 3OQ/P - Summative Project (8%) Task 1 - Time and Stress Management Assignment Objective: To understand,
More informationMathematics Program Assessment Plan
Mathematics Program Assessment Plan Introduction This assessment plan is tentative and will continue to be refined as needed to best fit the requirements of the Board of Regent s and UAS Program Review
More informationNumber of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)
Program: Journalism Minor Department: Communication Studies Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20 Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012) Period of reference
More informationPerson Centered Positive Behavior Support Plan (PC PBS) Report Scoring Criteria & Checklist (Rev ) P. 1 of 8
Scoring Criteria & Checklist (Rev. 3 5 07) P. 1 of 8 Name: Case Name: Case #: Rater: Date: Critical Features Note: The plan needs to meet all of the critical features listed below, and needs to obtain
More informationTABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards
TABE 9&10 Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards LEVEL E Test 1: Reading Name Class E01- INTERPRET GRAPHIC INFORMATION Signs Maps Graphs Consumer Materials Forms Dictionary
More informationMaximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge
Innov High Educ (2009) 34:93 103 DOI 10.1007/s10755-009-9095-2 Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge Phyllis Blumberg Published online: 3 February
More informationDiagnostic Test. Middle School Mathematics
Diagnostic Test Middle School Mathematics Copyright 2010 XAMonline, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by
More informationPSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016
PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016 Instructor: Gary Alderman Office Location: Kinard 110B Office Hours: Mon: 11:45-3:30; Tues: 10:30-12:30 Email: aldermang@winthrop.edu Phone:
More informationECD 131 Language Arts Early Childhood Development Business and Public Service
ECD 131 Language Arts Early Childhood Development Business and Public Service Semester Year Catalog Course Description: This course is a study of methods and materials in age-appropriate language experiences.
More informationSummer Assignment AP Literature and Composition Mrs. Schwartz
2015-2016 Summer Assignment AP Literature and Composition Mrs. Schwartz Contact Information: Email: meschwar@vbschools.com or bschwar12@gmail.com Edmodo Group Code: 534ta8 OVERVIEW This summer, you will
More informationEssentials of Ability Testing. Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology
Essentials of Ability Testing Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology Basic Topics Why do we administer ability tests? What do ability tests measure? How are
More informationRequirements for the Degree: Bachelor of Science in Education in Early Childhood Special Education (P-5)
Requirements for the Degree: Bachelor of Science in Education in Early Childhood Special Education (P-5) Core Curriculum Requirements: 60 hours Minimum Academic Good Standing Grade Point Average:.75 Upper
More informationOakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus
Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus For Secondary Schools The attached course syllabus is a developmental and integrated approach to skill acquisition throughout the
More informationWriting Effective Program Learning Outcomes. Deborah Panter, J.D. Director of Educational Effectiveness & Assessment
Writing Effective Program Learning Outcomes Deborah Panter, J.D. Director of Educational Effectiveness & Assessment Overall Assessment Process Articulate learning outcomes: What is this program about?
More informationDESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0
DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0 QUALITY RUBRIC FOR STEM PHILANTHROPY This rubric aims to help companies gauge the quality of their philanthropic efforts to boost learning in science, technology, engineering
More informationGENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION
GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION All students wishing to compete at the Educators Rising National Conference must complete 3 required steps: 1 Be a member of Educators Rising with an active profile in the
More informationMaintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus
Course Description This course is designed to help K-12 teachers navigate the ever-growing complexities of the education profession while simultaneously helping them to balance their lives and careers.
More informationPresentation 4 23 May 2017 Erasmus+ LOAF Project, Vilnius, Lithuania Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland.
The role of rubrics in making the assessment visible and clear Presentation 4 23 May 2017 Erasmus+ LOAF Project, Vilnius, Lithuania Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork,
More informationSchool Leadership Rubrics
School Leadership Rubrics The School Leadership Rubrics define a range of observable leadership and instructional practices that characterize more and less effective schools. These rubrics provide a metric
More informationInquiry Learning Methodologies and the Disposition to Energy Systems Problem Solving
Inquiry Learning Methodologies and the Disposition to Energy Systems Problem Solving Minha R. Ha York University minhareo@yorku.ca Shinya Nagasaki McMaster University nagasas@mcmaster.ca Justin Riddoch
More informationCORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16
SUBJECT: Career and Technical Education GRADE LEVEL: 9, 10, 11, 12 COURSE TITLE: COURSE CODE: 8909010 Introduction to the Teaching Profession CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
More informationParaprofessional Evaluation: School Year:
Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year: 2014-2015 Name Evaluator Contributing Evaluator Program Grade Site Observat ion Date: Observation Date Post-Conference Date Additional Observation Date-As Needed
More information