Profile of GMAT Testing: North America

Transcription

1 Profile of GMAT Testing: North America Five-Year Summary: TY2012 TY2016 November 2016 Globally, nearly 1.3 million Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT ) exams have been taken over the past five years by individuals interested in pursuing graduate management education. The GMAT exam is an important part of the admissions process for more than 6,100 graduate management programs worldwide. A total of 261,248 GMAT exams were taken worldwide by prospective business school students in testing year 2016 (TY2016), which ran from July 1, 2015 through June 30, These examinees sent a total of 561,866 score reports to graduate-level management programs across the globe. This report summarizes five-year GMAT testing trends for US and Canadian residents for: GMAT exams taken by US region, US state of residence, and race/ethnicity of examinees (US citizens only); GMAT exams taken by Canadian residents, by Canadian province; GMAT exams taken by gender and mean age of GMAT examinees; Mean GMAT Total Score; and GMAT score-sending breakdowns by program type (, non- master s, and doctoral/other), TY2016. Mean GMAT Total and mean age of examinees are provided for groups with five or more exams taken and 10 or more score reports sent. What Can I Do With the Data? Use the data to build candidate profiles for specific US or Canadian groups. For example, you can use the tables to determine the following about Pennsylvania residents who sat for the GMAT exam in TY2016: Pennsylvania residents sat for 3,667 GMAT exams. The mean age of Pennsylvania residents was 25.8 and the mean GMAT Total Score was 547. Of the 8,183 GMAT score reports sent by Pennsylvania residents, 75.8 percent were directed to programs. Women in Pennsylvania (26.7% of scores sent) were more likely than men in Pennsylvania (17.1%) to send scores to non- business master s programs. Pennsylvania residents represent 3.4 percent of total testing by US residents. Make this report your starting point to target your search of potential students and enhance school recruitment efforts. For example, purchase names of prospective students using the Graduate Management Admission Search Service (GMASS ) database or develop profiles of the decision-making process for US and Canadian candidates based on data in the mba.com Prospective Students Survey Interactive Report. About This Report This Data Brief summarizes five years of data for GMAT exams taken and score reports sent worldwide, filtered by US and Canadian residence at time of GMAT registration. Review GMAT exam and score reporting trends by: US Region of US State of Race/Ethnicity of US Citizens Canadian Province of About GMAT Examinees Data in this report reflect the total number of GMAT exams that generated valid Total during a given testing year. Test takers who took the exam more than once during the year are included in the aggregate data. For example, an individual who took the GMAT exam twice in TY2016 would represent a total of two exams taken during that year.

2 GMAT Volume and Score Preview In late June 2014, GMAC instituted a revised policy offering test takers the ability to preview their GMAT exam scores before deciding whether to accept or cancel the exam results. Although no score reports are distributed to schools for those who cancel their exam results, candidates do have the option to reinstate their scores and submit them to schools of their choosing at a later date. The ability to cancel exam results is not new; however, candidates in the past were unable to see their scores before making the decision to cancel a score. Following the policy change, the number of test takers choosing to cancel their score increased from approximately 1 percent a year to 27 percent in testing year (TY) Ultimately, the majority of test takers who cancel their exam results go on to retake the GMAT exam and generate a new set of reportable scores. This new candidate feature has led to different behaviors among candidates in the pipeline based on their GMAT exam performance. Table 1 shows that candidates with a GMAT Total Score lower than 650 tend to cancel their scores at a much higher rate than candidates who score 650 or greater (33% versus 11% in TY2016, respectively). This behavior, along with other factors such as changing demographics in the testing pool, has led to an increase in GMAT exam volume for candidates scoring 650 or greater an 18 percent increase in TY2016 compared with TY2014. In addition, GMAT score sending among this group of candidates is up by nearly 13,000 score reports in TY2016 when compared with TY2014. On the other hand, GMAT test takers scoring lower than 650 have reduced their GMAT score sending from 470,690 score reports in TY2014 to 331,726 in TY2016, a drop of nearly 140,000 score reports. These dynamics have led to a more refined candidate pool, with higher-scoring candidates representing more of the global GMAT exam pipeline and directing a greater number of GMAT score reports to business programs around the world. Care should be taken, however, when comparing aggregate score-sending figures in TY2016 with previous years, as fewer score reports overall are now being sent as candidates have changed their score cancel behavior in line with the new policy. GMAC reports annual GMAT exam trends to monitor global interest and student mobility in high-quality graduate management education worldwide. Because candidates who cancel their scores continue to represent recruitment opportunities for business programs around the world, GMAC will continue to include canceled exam volume in its candidate reports. This reporting change allows comparisons to be made more accurately across time for the number of exams taken by any given student group. Table 1. Distribution of GMAT Exams, Score Reports, and Canceled Score Rate (%) All Candidates Candidates With Total Score Lower Than 650 Candidates With Total Score of 650 or Greater TY2014 TY2015* TY2016* GMAT Exams 243, , ,248 GMAT 687, , ,866 Canceled Score Rate (%) 1.6% 19.2% 27.2% GMAT Exams 186, , ,037 GMAT 470, , ,726 Canceled Score Rate (%) 1.9% 23.8% 32.9% GMAT Exams 56,761 61,789 67,211 GMAT 217, , ,140 Canceled Score Rate (%) 0.4% 5.3% 10.8% GMAT exam volume for TY2014 includes only exams that resulted in a reportable score. GMAT exam volumes for TY2015 and TY2016 include both score reportable exams and those with candidate canceled scores. *Score Preview policy went into effect in TY Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved.

3 Table 2. GMAT Testing Trends by US Region of Region of All US Residents TY2016 Score Reports by Program Non- Total 144, , , , , , % 23.8% 2.9% Men 85,827 67,352 65,372 63,760 63, , % 20.4% 2.5% Women 58,823 46,082 45,506 44,980 45,916 94, % 29.2% 3.5% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 14,457 11,122 11,246 10,387 10,221 24, % 19.3% 3.2% Middle Atlantic Men 8,750 6,755 6,829 6,261 6,073 14, % 16.2% 3.0% Women 5,707 4,367 4,417 4,126 4,148 9, % 24.4% 3.5% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 27,466 22,176 21,539 21,120 20,563 45, % 23.8% 3.3% Men 16,493 13,351 12,667 12,348 11,843 28, % 19.1% 2.9% Midwest Women 10,973 8,825 8,872 8,772 8,718 17, % 31.6% 3.9% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 31,766 23,762 23,077 22,387 22,917 49, % 19.5% 2.4% Men 18,489 13,945 13,550 12,887 13,084 29, % 17.3% 1.9% Northeast Women 13,277 9,817 9,527 9,500 9,831 20, % 22.6% 3.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 27,128 21,679 20,456 19,604 19,299 44, % 33.1% 3.4% Men 15,698 12,527 11,813 11,534 11,215 27, % 29.7% 2.9% South Women 11,430 9,152 8,643 8,070 8,084 17, % 38.5% 4.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 15,610 12,774 12,267 12,566 12,925 29, % 25.5% 3.3% Men 9,198 7,597 7,273 7,401 7,729 18, % 21.5% 2.8% Southwest Women 6,412 5,177 4,994 5,165 5,196 10, % 32.5% 4.1% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 10.2% 0.7% US Military Bases Men % 8.5% 0.8% Women % 22.0% 0.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 28,082 21,807 22,175 22,514 23,287 52, % 21.1% 2.1% Men 17,094 13,088 13,149 13,203 13,381 31, % 17.7% 1.8% West Women 10,988 8,719 9,026 9,311 9,901 20, % 26.4% 2.7% Mean Age Mean Total Score Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved. 3

4 Table 3. GMAT Testing Trends by US State of TY2016 Score Reports by Program Non- Total 1,905 1,626 1,715 1,724 1,931 4, % 45.1% 2.4% Men ,068 2, % 42.8% 2.3% Alabama Women , % 48.7% 2.6% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 25.2% 1.3% Men % 21.1% 1.9% Alaska Women % 34.8% 0.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 1,698 1,298 1,255 1,273 1,354 3, % 29.1% 2.7% Men 1, , % 24.8% 2.9% Arizona Women , % 36.5% 2.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total , % 29.2% 5.6% Men % 23.6% 6.2% Arkansas Women % 38.8% 4.4% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 17,648 13,447 13,764 13,886 14,595 33, % 17.9% 1.8% Men 10,398 7,871 7,956 7,963 8,194 19, % 14.5% 1.3% California Women 7,250 5,576 5,808 5,923 6,399 13, % 22.6% 2.5% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 2,368 1,998 1,913 2,014 2,027 4, % 30.9% 1.7% Men 1,419 1,172 1,111 1,174 1,202 2, % 26.0% 1.7% Colorado Women , % 38.7% 1.8% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 2,122 1,669 1,701 1,581 1,459 3, % 24.0% 2.0% Men 1,305 1,054 1, , % 20.3% 1.3% Connecticut Women , % 31.1% 3.3% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 23.9% 2.7% Men % 19.4% 3.3% Delaware Women % 32.1% 1.5% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 1,673 1,185 1,437 1,446 1,426 3, % 7.7% 1.6% District of Columbia Men , % 7.4% 1.2% Women , % 8.2% 2.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved.

5 Table 3. GMAT Testing Trends by US State of TY2016 Score Reports by Program Non- Total 7,214 5,725 5,592 5,334 5,414 12, % 37.7% 4.3% Men 4,200 3,316 3,238 3,159 3,177 7, % 34.1% 3.7% Florida Women 3,014 2,409 2,354 2,175 2,237 4, % 43.4% 5.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 4,597 3,579 3,308 3,404 3,319 8, % 25.6% 2.7% Men 2,700 2,128 1,964 1,968 1,916 5, % 22.2% 2.1% Georgia Women 1,897 1,451 1,344 1,436 1,403 3, % 31.0% 3.7% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 17.6% 0.4% Men % 14.7% 0.0% Hawaii Women % 24.0% 1.3% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 33.9% 1.5% Men % 33.1% 0.2% Idaho Women % 37.2% 6.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 7,304 5,692 5,619 5,630 5,575 13, % 15.7% 2.7% Men 4,532 3,536 3,445 3,422 3,306 8, % 13.3% 2.3% Illinois Women 2,772 2,156 2,174 2,208 2,269 5, % 19.6% 3.3% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 2,227 1,860 2,028 2,086 2,133 4, % 30.1% 3.0% Men 1,380 1,178 1,214 1,177 1,165 2, % 19.7% 3.0% Indiana Women , % 46.4% 3.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 1,177 1,053 1,033 1, , % 33.2% 1.5% Men , % 25.0% 1.9% Iowa Women % 48.0% 0.8% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 1,245 1, , % 26.3% 3.4% Men % 21.7% 1.4% Kansas Women % 34.3% 7.1% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 1, , % 19.6% 3.6% Men , % 17.8% 3.9% Kentucky Women % 23.4% 3.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved. 5

6 Table 3. GMAT Testing Trends by US State of Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana TY2016 Score Reports by Program Non- Total 1,859 1,544 1,429 1,254 1,168 2, % 21.5% 3.6% Men , % 17.5% 3.6% Women , % 27.9% 3.5% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 13.6% 2.0% Men % 16.5% 0.0% Women % 7.3% 6.3% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 2,410 1,912 1,893 1,802 1,626 3, % 17.2% 3.4% Men 1,458 1,171 1,123 1, , % 14.3% 2.7% Women , % 22.1% 4.4% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 5,888 4,621 4,385 4,429 4,521 10, % 16.0% 2.6% Men 3,412 2,697 2,598 2,522 2,568 6, % 14.5% 2.2% Women 2,476 1,924 1,787 1,907 1,953 4, % 18.5% 3.3% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 3,466 2,912 2,762 2,749 2,841 6, % 28.3% 3.1% Men 2,078 1,758 1,678 1,672 1,678 4, % 22.5% 3.4% Women 1,388 1,154 1,084 1,077 1,163 2, % 39.3% 2.7% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 2,191 1,708 1,602 1,406 1,511 3, % 15.2% 1.8% Men 1,291 1, , % 10.4% 1.6% Women , % 22.5% 2.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 1, , % 38.1% 6.3% Men % 38.3% 4.1% Women % 37.8% 9.5% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 2,366 1,918 1,853 1,976 1,670 3, % 29.7% 3.8% Men 1,305 1,113 1,027 1, , % 24.5% 2.5% Women 1, , % 37.9% 5.9% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 30.8% 2.7% Men % 21.4% 0.0% Women % 41.7% 6.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved.

7 Table 3. GMAT Testing Trends by US State of TY2016 Score Reports by Program Non- Total % 21.2% 5.3% Men % 19.3% 4.6% Nebraska Women % 26.2% 7.3% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total , % 27.3% 3.0% Men % 24.6% 2.6% Nevada Women % 31.7% 3.8% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 17.1% 1.7% New Hampshire Men % 14.8% 2.5% Women % 21.9% 0.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 5,727 4,163 3,960 3,714 3,700 7, % 17.2% 2.5% Men 3,554 2,569 2,483 2,315 2,180 4, % 14.5% 1.9% New Jersey Women 2,173 1,594 1,477 1,399 1,520 2, % 21.7% 3.6% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 19.4% 4.9% Men % 17.0% 5.9% New Mexico Women % 23.4% 3.1% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 16,755 12,326 12,072 11,780 12,430 26, % 20.9% 2.4% Men 9,443 7,030 6,831 6,541 6,908 14, % 18.9% 1.9% New York Women 7,312 5,296 5,241 5,239 5,520 11, % 23.5% 3.1% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 4,390 3,356 3,103 2,888 2,830 6, % 36.9% 2.8% Men 2,624 2,025 1,866 1,765 1,663 4, % 33.1% 2.4% North Carolina Women 1,766 1,331 1,237 1,123 1,167 2, % 42.7% 3.3% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 23.5% 0.0% Men % 17.1% 0.0% North Dakota Women % 32.5% 0.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 4,674 3,636 3,490 3,307 3,168 6, % 30.1% 5.8% Men 2,789 2,106 1,944 1,900 1,729 4, % 25.6% 5.2% Ohio Women 1,885 1,530 1,546 1,407 1,439 2, % 37.1% 6.8% Mean Age Mean Total Score Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved. 7

8 Table 3. GMAT Testing Trends by US State of Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas US Military Bases TY2016 Score Reports by Program Non- Total 1,240 1,058 1,036 1,057 1,113 2, % 24.6% 3.4% Men , % 17.7% 2.2% Women % 36.8% 5.6% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 1,327 1,099 1,199 1,289 1,230 2, % 33.0% 2.4% Men , % 27.2% 2.4% Women % 40.5% 2.4% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 5,057 4,086 4,126 3,458 3,667 8, % 20.7% 3.5% Men 3,108 2,520 2,514 2,148 2,188 5, % 17.1% 3.5% Women 1,949 1,566 1,612 1,310 1,479 3, % 26.7% 3.6% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 25.2% 3.2% Men % 25.9% 1.2% Women % 24.2% 5.9% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 1,369 1, , , % 40.7% 3.9% Men , % 37.8% 1.8% Women % 45.4% 7.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 23.5% 4.4% Men % 19.9% 0.0% Women % 29.5% 11.6% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 2,508 2,133 2,011 1,834 1,732 4, % 25.0% 2.6% Men 1,535 1,313 1,244 1,126 1,040 2, % 22.1% 2.0% Women , % 30.3% 3.6% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 12,324 10,105 9,706 9,920 10,190 23, % 25.2% 3.3% Men 7,201 5,967 5,653 5,818 6,115 15, % 21.6% 2.8% Women 5,123 4,138 4,053 4,102 4,075 8, % 31.7% 4.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 10.2% 0.7% Men % 8.5% 0.8% Women % 22.0% 0.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved.

9 Table 3. GMAT Testing Trends by US State of TY2016 Score Reports by Program Non- Total 2,224 1,625 1,533 1,511 1,560 4, % 27.4% 4.9% Men 1,781 1,232 1,191 1,121 1,145 3, % 24.2% 5.1% Utah Women % 40.0% 4.3% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 20.8% 0.0% Men % 15.1% 0.0% Vermont Women % 29.9% 0.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 4,553 3,279 3,136 3,043 2,941 7, % 23.7% 3.5% Men 2,805 1,975 1,948 1,912 1,761 4, % 19.1% 3.3% Virginia Women 1,748 1,304 1,188 1,131 1,180 2, % 31.4% 3.9% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 2,643 2,175 2,312 2,384 2,461 5, % 21.2% 2.3% Men 1,591 1,311 1,319 1,380 1,357 3, % 16.4% 1.4% Washington Women 1, ,004 1,103 2, % 27.7% 3.5% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 33.2% 4.2% Men % 30.6% 4.7% West Virginia Women % 39.5% 3.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 1,857 1,563 1,493 1,446 1,393 3, % 25.4% 2.5% Men 1, , % 22.0% 2.3% Wisconsin Women , % 31.4% 2.8% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 25.5% 0.7% Men % 20.3% 0.0% Wyoming Women % 32.3% 1.6% Mean Age Mean Total Score Note: Dashes that appear in the table are used to indicate not applicable, such as when there are no examinees in a given subgroup, and thus, no scores exist. For examinee privacy, dashes are also used in place of mean age and mean Total when there are fewer than five exams taken or less than 10 score reports sent by any given candidate group Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved. 9

10 Table 4. GMAT Testing Trends by Race/Ethnicity (US Citizens Only) Race/Ethnicity (US Citizens Only) African American TY2016 Score Reports by Program Non Total 10,057 7,439 7,333 7,019 6,716 14, % 19.3% 5.8% Men 4,958 3,705 3,684 3,554 3,364 7, % 17.9% 5.2% Women 5,099 3,734 3,649 3,465 3,352 7, % 20.7% 6.4% Mean Age Mean Total Score American Indian, Alaskan Native, Pacific Islander, Other Native American Total , % 20.5% 2.4% Men % 23.8% 1.6% Women % 15.8% 3.5% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 14,091 9,770 10,082 9,998 10,409 24, % 17.2% 1.7% Men 7,917 5,597 5,794 5,633 5,680 13, % 16.1% 1.4% Asian American Women 6,174 4,173 4,288 4,365 4,729 10, % 18.7% 2.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 7,802 6,055 6,115 6,159 6,325 14, % 22.3% 3.0% Hispanic American Men 4,347 3,462 3,451 3,482 3,512 8, % 20.8% 2.7% Women 3,455 2,593 2,664 2,677 2,813 5, % 24.3% 3.4% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 77,776 61,459 57,906 56,078 54, , % 19.6% 1.6% White (Non-Hispanic) Men 49,611 39,582 37,494 36,265 35,196 89, % 18.2% 1.5% Women 28,165 21,877 20,412 19,813 19,107 41, % 22.6% 1.9% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 6,227 4,554 4,682 4,469 4,702 10, % 16.5% 2.3% Multiracial/ Multiethnic/ Other Men 3,599 2,621 2,714 2,683 2,754 6, % 15.8% 2.3% Women 2,628 1,933 1,968 1,786 1,941 3, % 17.7% 2.3% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 17.0% 2.0% Men % 14.2% 2.4% No Response Women % 21.7% 1.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Note: Dashes that appear in the table are used to indicate not applicable, such as when there are no examinees in a given subgroup, and thus, no scores exist. For examinee privacy, dashes are also used in place of mean age and mean Total when there are fewer than five exams taken or less than 10 score reports sent by any given candidate group Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved.

11 Table 5. GMAT Testing Trends by Canadian Province of Province of All Canadian Residents TY2016 Score Reports by Program Non - Total 9,313 7,969 7,534 7,774 8,895 17, % 19.9% 3.7% Men 5,458 4,739 4,474 4,540 5,021 10, % 16.3% 2.9% Women 3,855 3,230 3,060 3,234 3,873 6, % 25.3% 4.9% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total ,035 2, % 9.6% 3.5% Men , % 7.6% 3.2% Alberta Women % 14.3% 4.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 1, ,061 1, % 29.3% 3.6% British Columbia Men , % 25.5% 2.2% Women % 33.7% 5.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 18.5% 3.9% Men % 7.5% 5.5% Manitoba Women % 36.8% 1.1% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 23.7% 8.5% Men % 0.0% 15.2% New Brunswick Women % 53.8% 0.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 6.8% 3.4% Men % 6.0% 6.0% Newfoundland Women % 7.9% 0.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 24.3% 5.4% Men % 25.4% 2.6% Nova Scotia Women % 22.0% 11.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total Northwest Territories Men Women Mean Age Mean Total Score Total Men Nunavut Women Mean Age Mean Total Score 2016 Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved. 11

12 Table 5. GMAT Testing Trends by Canadian Province of Province of Ontario Prince Edward Island Quebec Saskatchewan Yukon TY2016 Score Reports by Program Non - Total 5,479 4,604 4,411 4,515 5,125 9, % 20.0% 3.0% Men 3,210 2,766 2,621 2,562 2,770 5, % 16.0% 2.2% Women 2,269 1,838 1,790 1,953 2,354 4, % 25.5% 4.2% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 35.0% 0.0% Men Women % 42.9% 0.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total 1, ,044 1,094 2, % 21.7% 6.6% Men , % 21.3% 5.4% Women % 22.5% 9.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total % 15.3% 1.7% Men % 9.5% 0.0% Women % 26.7% 5.0% Mean Age Mean Total Score Total Men Women Mean Age Mean Total Score Note: Dashes that appear in the table are used to indicate not applicable, such as when there are no examinees in a given subgroup, and thus, no scores exist. For examinee privacy, dashes are also used in place of mean age and mean Total when there are fewer than five exams taken or less than 10 score reports sent by any given candidate group. About the GMAT Exam The GMAT exam consists of four sections: Verbal, Quantitative, Analytical Writing, and Integrated Reasoning. GMAT Total, as presented in this report, are calculated based on performance on the Verbal and Quantitative sections of the exam. Total are reported in increments of 10, on a scale ranging from 200 to 800. Results are valid for a five-year period from test sitting. Please note that GMAT exam volume was artificially elevated in TY2012 as many examinees opted to sit for the exam before the addition of Integrated Reasoning (IR) in June Notes About the Data Gender Classifications Beginning in testing year 2016, individuals who registered to take the GMAT exam had the option of checking a gender category called Other when entering their background information and setting up an account on mba.com. In TY2016, a total of 13 GMAT exams were taken by individuals who checked the Other gender option when registering. These exams are reflected in the total exam count in the region and country tables but are not broken out in separate gender categories within the tables Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved.

13 GMAT Program Code Classifications Program data in this report are based on a business school s current GMAT code classifications for its respective programs. In any given GMAT testing year, school representatives have the opportunity to modify their program classifications if they differ from original classifications established at the time of GMAT program code assignment. As a result, historic GMAT score-sending data may change based on such program classification changes. Review of Historical GMAT Testing Data In August 2015, GMAC conducted a review of historical GMAT testing data using new database technology. Minor anomalies were discovered and subsequently corrected for GMAT testing data between TY2007 and TY2008. Updated testing volumes for this period have dropped by approximately 1,000 exams. For details please contact David Svancer at dsvancer@gmac.com or the GMAC Research Services Department at research@gmac.com. Regional Categories UNITED STATES Middle Atlantic Delaware District of Columbia (Washington, DC) Maryland Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia Midwest Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Michigan Minnesota Missouri Nebraska North Dakota Ohio South Dakota Wisconsin Northeast Connecticut Maine Related Publications Massachusetts New Hampshire New Jersey New York Rhode Island Vermont South Alabama Arkansas Florida Georgia Kentucky Louisiana Mississippi North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee Southwest Arizona New Mexico Oklahoma Texas West Alaska California Colorado Hawaii Idaho Montana Nevada Oregon Utah Washington Wyoming CANADA Alberta British Columbia Manitoba New Brunswick Newfoundland Nova Scotia Northwest Territories Nunavut Ontario Prince Edward Island Quebec Saskatchewan Yukon Profile of GMAT Testing: Citizenship, Five-Year Summary, TY2012 TY2016 gmac.com/profile Profile of GMAT Testing:, Five-Year Summary, TY2012 TY2016 gmac.com/profile 2016 mba.com Prospective Students Survey Report gmac.com/prospectivestudents 2016 mba.com Prospective Students Interactive Research Tool gmac.com/interactiveresearch 2016 Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved. 13

14 Admissions Recruiting Resource Looking for more students? The Graduate Management Admission Search Service (GMASS ) database can help you find the best talent to recruit for your programs. As a GMAT score recipient, you have access to the GMASS global database of prospective candidates interested in graduate management education nearly 500,000 candidates who are waiting to hear from you. The benefits of using the GMASS service: Target your audience: Use more than 30 criteria to narrow your search and tailor your message for the best response rate. Get the most up-to-date contacts: The global GMASS database is updated daily. Save time: Receive automatic results daily, weekly, or monthly, and save your best searches. Recruit early: Target GMAT pre-test candidates early in their decision-making process. Save money: GMASS is a cost-effective way to build multichannel marketing programs. For more information, or to start a GMASS subscription, please contact Paula McKay at pmckay@gmac.com, or visit gmac.com/gmass. Contact Information For questions or comments regarding the study findings, methodology, or data, please contact the GMAC Research Services Department at research@gmac.com. For more information about all Research Services products, surveys, and resources, visit gmac.com/research. Contributors The following individuals from the GMAC Research Services Department made significant contributions to the publication of this report: David Svancer, Senior Manager, Data Science, data preparation and manuscript review; Hillary Chan, Research Analysis Associate Manager, analysis, interpretation of data, and revising of manuscript for intellectual content; Paula Bruggeman, Research Publications Manager, editorial review and publication management; Tacoma Williams, Research Senior Coordinator, quality assurance; Gregg Schoenfeld, Director, Management Education Research, data and manuscript review. GMAC Global Office Locations GMAC Hong Kong GMAC India GMAC London GMAC USA P: apac@gmac.com P: apac@gmac.com P: +44 (0) emea@gmac.com P: customercare@gmac.com 2016 Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC ). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, distributed, or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of GMAC. For permission, contact the GMAC legal department at legal@gmac.com. The GMAC logo, GMAC, GMAT, GMASS, Graduate Management Admission Council, Graduate Management Admission Test, and Graduate Management Admission Search Service are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council in the United States and other countries.