Bridging General Education and Special Education:
|
|
- Hilda Russell
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 9/28/12 Bridging General Education and Special Education: Using Response to Intervention (RtI) to Identify Students with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Using data collected in the Tier Model to identify students with a Specific Learning Disability (SLD): Essential components of an RtI system Documenting tiered interventions Using norms to determine discrepancy Using RtI to determine discrepancy Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 2 The Three Tier Instructional Model is intended to help all students be successful in general education. Response to lntervention (RtI) in Federal regulations and special education policy refers to a method for determining eligibility for Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD). Research may refer to both models as RtI; however, the use of the process is different. Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 3 1
2 9/28/12 The instructional model shall consist of three tiers of instruction: Tier 1: Quality classroom instruction based on MS Curriculum Frameworks (Common Core) Tier 2: Focused supplemental instruction Tier 3: Intensive interventions specifically designed to meet the individual needs of students Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 4 Help for all students in general education Prevention model Prediction of at-risk students Provision of intervention(s) for students with academic and/or behavioral difficulties Identify students who are not progressing at a rate or level commensurate with peers Provide supplemental instruction or intensive interventions Monitor progress Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 5 5% Tier 3 5% D AT D AT 15% A Tier 2 A 15% D AT D AT % A A % Tier 1 6 Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Programs/Office of Special Education 2
3 9/28/12 1. High-quality, differentiated classroom instruction aligned with State standards and grade-level expectations 2. Universal screening of academics and behavior using general outcomes measures (e.g., curriculum-based measurement) to identify students at-risk 3. Parental engagement in intervention process 4. Continuum of research- or evidence-based interventions of increasing intensity across the tiers 5. Implementation of supplemental instruction or intensive interventions with treatment integrity/fidelity 6. Continuous progress monitoring using skill-specific and general outcome measures to determine response to intervention and/or improvement in outcomes 7. Data Team to collect and analyze data and to determine appropriate changes in instruction or intervention Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 7 Practices of scientifically-based instruction: Content matched to student expectations and foundational/sequenced knowledge and skills Delivery of explicit description of expectations to engaged students provided with frequent opportunities to rehearse Pacing intensive massed practice of new knowledge and skills and selective review of previous knowledge and skills Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 8 Practices of scientifically-based instruction: Immediate feedback on correct or incorrect student response with opportunities to rehearse Assessment of students throughout the lesson, daily formative assessment, and weekly summative assessment to determine if changes to instruction are warranted Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 9 3
4 9/28/12 Was the core program aligned to State standards? Was the curriculum in place for a sufficient amount of time? Were the teachers trained in use of the curriculum? Were the teachers using effective instructional methodologies? Was the instruction differentiated to accommodate students learning needs? Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 1 1. Determine the measures for Universal Screening. Reading Math Initial Sound Fluency Oral Counting Letter Naming Fluency Number Identification Letter Sound Fluency Quantity Discrimination Phoneme Segmentation Missing Number Nonsense Word Fluency Single skill type Oral Reading Fluency Multiple skill types MAZE Procedure Math Concepts and Applications Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Determine the criteria for moving to Tier 2. Which students are in the bottom % of the class or grade? Which students are not on-track to meet gradelevel expectations? Which students are below cut scores that differentially predict who are likely to be successful (on State accountability tests)? Which students are significantly below local or national norms? Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 12 4
5 9/28/12 Parents should: Be informed regularly of student progress Be involved in supporting education by attending conferences, monitoring homework, and sharing their values about education Be provided meaningful opportunities to support their child Be engaged in meaningful decision-making for their child National Center on RtI Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 13 Was a team used to help design and support the interventions? Were the interventions supported by scientific research? Were the interventionists trained in delivery of the interventions with fidelity? Were treatment protocols followed (were fidelity checks used)? Were the interventions implemented for a sufficient amount of time? Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 14 General Academics California Learning Resource Network: Doing What Works: dww.ed.gov Intervention Central: National Center for Learning Disabilities: Promising Practices Network: What Works Clearinghouse: Wing Institute: winginstitute.org Reading Big Ideas in Beginning Reading: reading.uoregon.edu Florida Center for Reading Research: Literacy Information & Communication System: lincs.ed.gov National Reading Panel: Oregon Reading First: oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 15 5
6 9/28/12 Tier students 2-4 times/week -3 minutes Does not replace core instruction Monitor progress in 2-week intervals Tier students 5 times/week 3-9 minutes May replace core instruction Monitor progress 1-2 times per week Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Set up the progress monitoring graph. Record baseline data (median of 3 samples). Draw a goal line. Record progress (median of 3 samples) and review at regular intervals. If data points follow the goal line, continue the intervention until grade-level performance is achieved for 6 or more data points. If 3 data points fall below the goal line, change the intensity, frequency, or duration of the intervention. Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Determine the criteria for moving to Tier 3 or referral to special education. If the data shows little or no progress after changes of intensity, frequency, and/or duration to intervention, consider moving to Tier 3 or referral to special education. If the data shows little or no progress after 18 weeks in Tier 3, refer to special education. Continue providing interventions to attempt to improve the student s response even when the child is being evaluated for special education. Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 18 6
7 9/28/12 Tier 3 interventions can be implemented: Prior to referral for a comprehensive evaluation; Concurrently with a comprehensive evaluation; As part of an initial comprehensive evaluation or reevaluation; or When a referral for a comprehensive evaluation is made, but the child is not suspected of a disability. Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 19 A parent may request an initial evaluation at any time during the RtI process. The Teacher Support Team may request an initial evaluation: At any time during the RtI process if they suspect the child has a disability After an appropriate period of time if the child has not made adequate progress when given research-based intervention indicating the child may have a specific learning disability. Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of DO YOU HAVE A CONCERN? Observe/record the student s performance IS IT SIGNIFICANT? Compare the student to peers and grade/class expectations WHAT SHOULD WE DO? Explore solutions and develop an intervention plan for the student IS IT WORKING? Implement and monitor the student s progress on important outcomes IS THE CONCERN RESOLVED? Compare the student to peers and grade/class expectations Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office 21 7
8 9/28/12 Problem Identification and Certification Establish discrepancy of performance and rate of learning Does the student perform below the level of his classroom peers? [score] Does the student learn at a rate below that of his classroom peers? [slope] Establish the significance of the discrepancies Are the deficits sufficient to determine disability <1 th percentile 1-2 standard deviations below the mean 2.X difference between expected and actual performance Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 22 Draw a trendline for actual student progress Calculate the slope Slope = Y2-Y1 X2-X1 Y2: Score on last probe Y1: Score on first probe X2: Last time period X1: First time period Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office 24 8
9 Baseline 9/28/ Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal
10 Change Intervention 9/28/ Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 1 Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 2 3 1
11 MET request Change Intervention 9/28/ Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal
12 MET decision Consent for Eval 9/28/ Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 2 Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Evaluation Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal
13 Change Intervention 9/28/ Evaluation Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Evaluation Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Evaluation Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 3 Goal
14 Determine Eligibility 9/28/ Evaluation Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 4 Y2-Y Slope = = = = 1.25 wcpm/wk X2-X1 - Y2 is the score on last probe = 7 wcpm Y1 is the score on first probe = 45 wcpm X2 is the last time period = weeks X1 is the first time period = weeks Mississippi Department of Education Fall 11- Spring 12 Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of 41 Special Education Y2-Y Slope = = = =.65 wcpm/wk X2-X1 - Y2 is the score on last probe = 24 wcpm Y1 is the score on first probe = 11 wcpm X2 is the last time period = weeks X1 is the first time period = weeks Mississippi Department of Education Fall 11- Spring 12 Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of 42 Special Education 14
15 Eligible 9/28/12 Are the student s deficits sufficient to determine disability? <1th percentile 1-2 standard deviations below the mean X difference between expected and actual performance Calculate Rate of Improvement (ROI) Difference between expected and actual: Norm / Student = 1.25 /.65 = 1.92X Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Evaluation IEP Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Evaluation IEP Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal
16 Change Intervention 9/28/ Evaluation IEP Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Evaluation IEP Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 4 Goal Evaluation IEP Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal
17 Baseline 9/28/ Evaluation IEP Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 4 Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal
18 Change Intervention 9/28/ Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 1 Goal
19 MET request 9/28/ Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal
20 Change MET decision Intervention 9/28/ Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 2 Goal Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 3
21 Consent for Eval Determine Eligibility 9/28/ Evaluation Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal Evaluation Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 3 62 Y2-Y Slope = = = = 1.25 wcpm/wk X2-X1 - Y2 is the score on last probe = 7 wcpm Y1 is the score on first probe = 45 wcpm X2 is the last time period = weeks X1 is the first time period = weeks Mississippi Department of Education Fall 11- Spring 12 Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of 63 Special Education 21
22 Ineligible 9/28/12 Y2-Y Slope = = = = 1.1 wcpm/wk X2-X1 - Y2 is the score on last probe = 33 wcpm Y1 is the score on first probe = 11 wcpm X2 is the last time period = weeks X1 is the first time period = weeks Mississippi Department of Education Fall 11- Spring 12 Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of 64 Special Education Are the student s deficits sufficient to determine disability? <1th percentile 1-2 standard deviations below the mean X difference between expected and actual performance Calculate Rate of Improvement (ROI) Difference between expected and actual: Norm / Student = 1.25 / 1.1 = 1.14X Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Evaluation Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal
23 9/28/ Evaluation Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 3 67 Y2-Y Slope = = = = 1.2 wcpm/wk X2-X1 3-3 Y2 is the score on last probe = 81 wcpm Y1 is the score on first probe = 45 wcpm X2 is the last time period = 3 weeks X1 is the first time period = weeks Mississippi Department of Education Fall 11- Spring 12 Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of 68 Special Education Y2-Y Slope = = = = 1.5 wcpm/wk X2-X1 3-3 Y2 is the score on last probe = 56 wcpm Y1 is the score on first probe = 11 wcpm X2 is the last time period = 3 weeks X1 is the first time period = weeks Mississippi Department of Education Fall 11- Spring 12 Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of 69 Special Education 23
24 9/28/12 Are the student s deficits sufficient to determine disability? <1th percentile 1-2 standard deviations below the mean X difference between expected and actual performance Calculate Rate of Improvement (ROI) Difference between expected and actual: Norm / Student = 1.2 / 1.5 =.8X Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Evaluation Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 71 How deficient is the student? Divide the norm group mean ROI by the student s ROI. Result is expressed as a ratio of deficiency (X). Example: Norm group: 1.25 wcpm/wk =.83X Student: 1.5 wcpm/wk Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 72 24
25 9/28/12 Is the rate of progress below the target and typical rate? Has the student received targeted instructional support for an adequate amount of time? Were multiple data-driven changes made using research-proven techniques and interventions? Does progress monitoring indicate he is performing significantly below his peers? Is he scoring at/below Basic on State tests? Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 73 Specific Learning Disability (SLD) means a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language, spoken or written, that may manifest itself in the imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell or to do mathematical calculations, including conditions such as perceptual disabilities, brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia, and developmental aphasia. Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 74 Public agencies: Must first consider a process based on the child s response to scientific, research-based intervention; May use a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement; and/or May use other alternative research-based procedures. Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 75 25
26 9/28/12 The Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team (MET): The child s general education teacher If the child does not have a teacher, include a general education teacher qualified to teach the grade/age level A special education teacher A Diagnostician School Psychologist Psychometrist Speech-Language Pathologist Remedial Reading Teacher Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 76 Document all aspects of 3.39(a)(1)-(2) The child does not achieve adequately for his age OR does not meet State-approved grade level standards AND The child demonstrates a pattern of strengths and weaknesses OR has shown a lack of response to scientifically based instruction AND Exclusionary factors have been ruled out AND Academic problems are not the result of lack of instruction Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 77 Document findings of learning difficulties not the result of: Visual, hearing, or motor disabilities; Mental retardation (Intellectual Disability); Emotional disturbance; Cultural factors; Environmental or economic disadvantage; or Limited English proficiency. Document findings not the result of lack of appropriate instruction using RtI data. Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 78 26
27 9/28/12 Interventions Tier I Tier II Tier III Lack of adequate progress after appropriate length of time Suspect a disability Written parental request for CA No later than 18 weeks Continue Refer Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team Meet to consider request Evaluate Not evaluate Give WPN to parents Give Procedural Safeguards Obtain written parental consent Conduct Comprehensive Evaluation Develop IEP Timelines 1 school days 5 days? Days days 3 days 15+ days Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 79 Does policy allow RtI data for SLD identification? Is the data reliable? Improve data reliability. Use RtI data plus other sources of information to document SLD. Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of References Brown-Chidsey R. & Steege, M.W. (1) Response to Intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice (2nd Ed.) New York: Guilford Press Researchers Ted Christ Scott Ardoin Information Centers National Center for Progress Monitoring: National Center for RTI: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities: Pennsylvania Training/Technical Assistance Network: Vanderbilt University s IRIS Center: iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/rti2_assessment/cresource.htm Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of 81 27
28 9/28/12 OSE Technical Assistance Staff: Stacy Callender, Prog. Coordinator Desma McElveen, Division Director Tanya Bradley, Bureau Director MS Dept. of Education Office of Special Education 359 N. West Street P. O. Box 771 Jackson, MS 395 (1) Fall Copyright 12 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Programs/Office of Special Education 28
Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities Part 3: Referral & Evaluation Process; Documentation Requirements
Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities Part 3: Referral & Evaluation Process; Documentation Requirements Section 3 & Section 4: 62-66 # Reminder: Watch for a blue box in top right corner
More informationInstructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.
Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process and Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CLD) Students Guidelines and Resources
More informationHow To: Structure Classroom Data Collection for Individual Students
How the Common Core Works Series 2013 Jim Wright www.interventioncentral.org 1 How To: Structure Classroom Data Collection for Individual Students When a student is struggling in the classroom, the teacher
More informationWonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13
Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade Wonderworks Tier II Intervention Program (K 5) Guidance for using K 1st, Grade 2 & Grade 3 5 Flowcharts This document provides guidelines to school site personnel
More informationApplying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings
Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings As Florida s educational system continues to engage in systemic reform resulting in integrated efforts toward
More informationData-Based Decision Making: Academic and Behavioral Applications
Data-Based Decision Making: Academic and Behavioral Applications Just Read RtI Institute July, 008 Stephanie Martinez Florida Positive Behavior Support Project George Batsche Florida Problem-Solving/RtI
More informationGlenn County Special Education Local Plan Area. SELPA Agreement
Page 1 of 10 Educational Mental Health Related Services, A Tiered Approach Draft Final March 21, 2012 Introduction Until 6-30-10, special education students with severe socio-emotional problems who did
More informationThe State and District RtI Plans
The State and District RtI Plans April 11, 2008 Presented by: MARICA CULLEN and ELIZABETH HANSELMAN As of January 1, 2009, all school districts will be required to have a district RtI plan. This presentation
More informationK-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)
K-12 Academic Intervention Plan Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI) September 2016 June 2018 2016 2018 K 12 Academic Intervention Plan Table of Contents AIS Overview...Page
More informationOVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE
OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D. Michelle M. Shinn, Ph.D. Formative Evaluation to Inform Teaching Summative Assessment: Culmination measure. Mastery
More informationClarkstown Central School District. Response to Intervention & Academic Intervention Services District Plan
Clarkstown Central School District Response to Intervention & Academic Intervention Services District Plan 2014-2017 Clarkstown Central School District Board of Education 2013-2014 Michael Aglialoro -
More informationSPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM (Revised 11/2014) 1 Fern Ridge Schools Specialist Performance Review and Evaluation System TABLE OF CONTENTS Timeline of Teacher Evaluation and Observations
More informationPyramid. of Interventions
Pyramid of Interventions Introduction to the Pyramid of Interventions Quick Guide A system of academic and behavioral support for ALL learners Cincinnati Public Schools is pleased to provide you with our
More informationMIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)
MIDDLE SCHOOL Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE) Board Approved July 28, 2010 Manual and Guidelines ASPIRE MISSION The mission of the ASPIRE program
More informationProgress Monitoring & Response to Intervention in an Outcome Driven Model
Progress Monitoring & Response to Intervention in an Outcome Driven Model Oregon RTI Summit Eugene, Oregon November 17, 2006 Ruth Kaminski Dynamic Measurement Group rkamin@dibels.org Roland H. Good III
More informationThe Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3
The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3 The State Board adopted the Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework (December 2009) as guidance for the State, districts, and schools
More informationNewburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan
Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic Academic Intervention Services Plan Revised September 2016 October 2015 Newburgh Enlarged City School District Elementary Academic Intervention Services
More informationGifted & Talented. Dyslexia. Special Education. Updates. March 2015!
Gifted & Talented Dyslexia Special Education Updates Gifted & Talented Where Are We Now? Program of Services! Identification! Professional Development! Communication! GT Update Percent of Students in RISD
More informationPRESENTED BY EDLY: FOR THE LOVE OF ABILITY
HOW TO BE YOUR CHILD S BEST IEP ADVOCATE PRESENTED BY EDLY: FOR THE LOVE OF ABILITY 888-EDLYOWL (888-335-9695) info@edlyeducation.com Nothing presented either orally or written in this seminar should be
More informationAcademic Intervention Services (Revised October 2013)
Town of Webb UFSD Academic Intervention Services (Revised October 2013) Old Forge, NY 13420 Town of Webb UFSD ACADEMIC INTERVENTION SERVICES PLAN Table of Contents PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE NEED: 1. AIS referral
More informationL.E.A.P. Learning Enrichment & Achievement Program
L.E.A.P. Learning Enrichment & Achievement Program 2016-2017 GRACE Christian School 801 Buck Jones Road (TK-6) 1101 Buck Jones Road (7-12) Raleigh, NC 27606 919-747-2020 Learning Enrichment & Achievement
More informationTools and. Response to Intervention RTI: Monitoring Student Progress Identifying and Using Screeners,
RTI: Monitoring Student Progress Identifying and Using Screeners, Progress Monitoring Tools and Classroom Data Jim Wright www.interventioncentral.org www.interventioncentral.org Workshop Agenda Response
More informationISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn
qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqw ertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopa sdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj klzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklz
More informationPSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016
PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016 Instructor: Gary Alderman Office Location: Kinard 110B Office Hours: Mon: 11:45-3:30; Tues: 10:30-12:30 Email: aldermang@winthrop.edu Phone:
More informationPort Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN
Port Jefferson Union Free School District Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN 2016-2017 Approved by the Board of Education on August 16, 2016 TABLE of CONTENTS
More informationCalifornia Rules and Regulations Related to Low Incidence Handicaps
California Rules and Regulations Related to Low Incidence Handicaps Meeting the Needs of Low Incidence Students 30 EC 5600.5 (a) The Legislature finds and declares that: (1) Pupils with low incidence disabilities,
More informationClinical Review Criteria Related to Speech Therapy 1
Clinical Review Criteria Related to Speech Therapy 1 I. Definition Speech therapy is covered for restoration or improved speech in members who have a speechlanguage disorder as a result of a non-chronic
More informationAIS/RTI Mathematics. Plainview-Old Bethpage
AIS/RTI Mathematics Plainview-Old Bethpage 2015-2016 What is AIS Math? AIS is a partnership between student, parent, teacher, math specialist, and curriculum. Our goal is to steepen the trajectory of each
More informationBSP !!! Trainer s Manual. Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University. M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon
Basic FBA to BSP Trainer s Manual Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon Chris Borgmeier, Ph.D. Portland State University Robert Horner,
More informationRecommended Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Children with Learning Disabilities
Recommended Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Children with Learning Disabilities Bill Colvin, Mary Sue Crawford, Oliver Foese, Tim Hogan, Stephen James, Jack Kamrad, Maria Kokai, Carolyn Lennox, David Schwartzbein
More informationQUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESSING THE HANDOUTS AND THE POWERPOINT
Answers to Questions Posed During Pearson aimsweb Webinar: Special Education Leads: Quality IEPs and Progress Monitoring Using Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D. QUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESSING
More informationColorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report
Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for 2015-16 Online UIP Report Organization Code: 2690 District Name: PUEBLO CITY 60 Official 2014 SPF: 1-Year Executive Summary How are students performing?
More informationContract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)
Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4) Evidence Used in Evaluation Rubric (5) Evaluation Cycle: Training (6) Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation (7) Evaluation Cycle:
More informationSY 6200 Behavioral Assessment, Analysis, and Intervention Spring 2016, 3 Credits
SY 6200 Behavioral Assessment, Analysis, and Intervention Spring 2016, 3 Credits Instructor: Christina Flanders, Psy.D., NCSP Office: Samuel Read Hall, Rm 303 Email: caflanders1@plymouth.edu Office Hours:
More informationSTAFF DEVELOPMENT in SPECIAL EDUCATION
STAFF DEVELOPMENT in SPECIAL EDUCATION Factors Affecting Curriculum for Students with Special Needs AASEP s Staff Development Course FACTORS AFFECTING CURRICULUM Copyright AASEP (2006) 1 of 10 After taking
More informationSpecial Education Program Continuum
Special Education Program Continuum 2014-2015 Summit Hill School District 161 maintains a full continuum of special education instructional programs, resource programs and related services options based
More informationPrevent Teach Reinforce
Prevent Teach Reinforce 1/28/16 PaTTAN Harrisburg Kim Seymour, M.Ed., Ed.S. Adapted from: Iovannone, R., Smith, L.M., Neugebauer, T.L., & Boyer, D. (2015, October). Building State or District Capacity
More informationRtI: Changing the Role of the IAT
RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT Aimee A. Kirsch Akron Public Schools Akron, Ohio akirsch@akron.k12.oh.us Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative November 3, 2006 1 Introductions Akron Public
More informationSSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017
Image by Photographer s Name (Credit in black type) or Image by Photographer s Name (Credit in white type) Use of the new SSIS-SEL Edition for Screening, Assessing, Intervention Planning, and Progress
More informationGuide to the New Hampshire Rules for the Education of Children with Disabilities
Guide to the New Hampshire Rules for the Education of Children with Disabilities This Document includes the NH Rules for the Education of Children with Disabilities that were adopted by the State Board
More informationExpanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation
I. ELT Design is Driven by Focused School-wide Priorities The school s ELT design (schedule, staff, instructional approaches, assessment systems, budget) is driven by no more than three school-wide priorities,
More informationRunning Head GAPSS PART A 1
Running Head GAPSS PART A 1 Current Reality and GAPSS Assignment Carole Bevis PL & Technology Innovation (ITEC 7460) Kennesaw State University Ed.S. Instructional Technology, Spring 2014 GAPSS PART A 2
More informationUsing CBM to Help Canadian Elementary Teachers Write Effective IEP Goals
Exceptionality Education International Volume 21 Issue 1 Article 6 1-1-2011 Using CBM to Help Canadian Elementary Teachers Write Effective IEP Goals Chris Mattatall Queen's University, cmattatall@mun.ca
More informationExaminee Information. Assessment Information
A WPS TEST REPORT by Patti L. Harrison, Ph.D., and Thomas Oakland, Ph.D. Copyright 2010 by Western Psychological Services www.wpspublish.com Version 1.210 Examinee Information ID Number: Sample-02 Name:
More informationNo Parent Left Behind
No Parent Left Behind Navigating the Special Education Universe SUSAN M. BREFACH, Ed.D. Page i Introduction How To Know If This Book Is For You Parents have become so convinced that educators know what
More informationImplementing Response to Intervention (RTI) National Center on Response to Intervention
Implementing (RTI) Session Agenda Introduction: What is implementation? Why is it important? (NCRTI) Stages of Implementation Considerations for implementing RTI Ineffective strategies Effective strategies
More informationScholastic Leveled Bookroom
Scholastic Leveled Bookroom Aligns to Title I, Part A The purpose of Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs is to ensure that children in high-poverty schools meet challenging State academic content
More informationComprehensive Progress Report
Brawley Middle Comprehensive Progress Report 9/30/2017 Mission: Our Vision, Mission, and Core Values Vision Brawley will aspire to be a top 10 middle school in North Carolina by inspiring innovative thinking,
More informationMilton Public Schools Special Education Programs & Supports
Milton Public Schools 2013-14 Special Education Programs & Supports Program Early Childhood Pre-School Integrated Program Substantially Separate Classroom Elementary School Programs Co-taught Classrooms
More informationQUESTIONS and Answers from Chad Rice?
QUESTIONS and Answers from Chad Rice? If a teacher, who teaches in a self contained ED class, only has 3 students, must she do SLOs? For these teachers that do not have enough students to capture The 6
More informationSpecial Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy
Thamesmead School Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy 2016-2017 Person Responsible Governors Committee Review Period P.Rodin Standards & Performance Annually Date of Review July 2016
More informationSpecial Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy. November 2016
Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy November 2016 This Policy complies with the statutory requirement laid out in the SEND Code of Practice 0 25 (January 2015) and has been written with
More informationESE SUPPORT & PROCEDURES ESE FTE PREPARATION ESE FUNDING & ALLOCATIONS
Office of Exceptional Student Education and Student Support Miami-Dade County Public Schools ESE SUPPORT & PROCEDURES ESE FTE PREPARATION ESE FUNDING & ALLOCATIONS Ava Goldman, Administrative Director
More informationCONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS
CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS No. 18 (replaces IB 2008-21) April 2012 In 2008, the State Education Department (SED) issued a guidance document to the field regarding the
More informationRecent advances in research and. Formulating Secondary-Level Reading Interventions
Formulating Secondary-Level Reading Interventions Debra M. Kamps and Charles R. Greenwood Abstract Recent advances concerning emerging/beginning reading skills, positive behavioral support (PBS), and three-tiered
More informationCONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education
CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION Connecticut State Department of Education October 2017 Preface Connecticut s educators are committed to ensuring that students develop the skills and acquire
More informationGetting Results Continuous Improvement Plan
Page of 9 9/9/0 Department of Education Market Street Harrisburg, PA 76-0 Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan 0-0 Principal Name: Ms. Sharon Williams School Name: AGORA CYBER CS District Name:
More informationWHO ARE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS? HOW CAN THEY HELP THOSE OUTSIDE THE CLASSROOM? Christine Mitchell-Endsley, Ph.D. School Psychology
WHO ARE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS? HOW CAN THEY HELP THOSE OUTSIDE THE CLASSROOM? Christine Mitchell-Endsley, Ph.D. School Psychology Presentation Goals Ensure a better understanding of what school psychologists
More informationIEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES
You supply the passion & dedication. IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES We ll support your daily practice. Who s here? ~ Something you want to learn more about 10 Basic Steps in Special Education Child is
More informationGeorgia Department of Education
Georgia Department of Education Early Intervention Program (EIP) Guidance 2014-2015 School Year The Rubrics are required for school districts to use along with other supporting documents in making placement
More informationResearch Design & Analysis Made Easy! Brainstorming Worksheet
Brainstorming Worksheet 1) Choose a Topic a) What are you passionate about? b) What are your library s strengths? c) What are your library s weaknesses? d) What is a hot topic in the field right now that
More informationCHILDREN ARE SPECIAL A RESOURCE GUIDE FOR PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES. From one parent to another...
A RESOURCE GUIDE FOR PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES CHILDREN ARE SPECIAL From one parent to another... Learning that your child has or even may be suspected of having a disability is difficult.
More informationDATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P
TITLE III REQUIREMENTS STATE POLICY DEFINITIONS DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITY IDENTIFICATION OF LEP STUDENTS A district that receives funds under Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act shall comply with the
More informationTRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Consultancy Special Education: January 11-12, 2016 Table of Contents District Visit Information 3 Narrative 4 Thoughts in Response to the Questions
More informationPROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials
Instructional Accommodations and Curricular Modifications Bringing Learning Within the Reach of Every Student PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials 2007, Stetson Online
More informationPerson Centered Positive Behavior Support Plan (PC PBS) Report Scoring Criteria & Checklist (Rev ) P. 1 of 8
Scoring Criteria & Checklist (Rev. 3 5 07) P. 1 of 8 Name: Case Name: Case #: Rater: Date: Critical Features Note: The plan needs to meet all of the critical features listed below, and needs to obtain
More informationStrategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013
Georgia Network for Educational and Therapeutic Support (GNETS) Strategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013 Introduction The Georgia Network for Educational and Therapeutic Support (GNETS) is comprised
More informationEMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES
KAHNAWAKE EDUCATION CENTER P.O. BOX 1000 KAHNAWAKE, QUEBEC J0L 1B0 TEL: (450) 632-8770 FAX: (450) 632-8042 EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES LOCATION: POSITION: SALARY RANGE: DURATION: REQUIREMENTS: KARONHIANONHNHA
More informationHOW TO REQUEST INITIAL ASSESSMENT UNDER IDEA AND/OR SECTION 504 IN ALL SUSPECTED AREAS OF DISABILITY FOR A CHILD WITH DIABETES
HOW TO REQUEST INITIAL ASSESSMENT UNDER IDEA AND/OR SECTION 504 IN ALL SUSPECTED AREAS OF DISABILITY FOR A CHILD WITH DIABETES PARENT STEP 1: OBTAIN YOUR CHILD S PHYSICIAN S DIRECTIVE FOR HEALTH CARE Parent
More informationCooper Upper Elementary School
LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS http://cooper.livoniapublicschools.org 215-216 Annual Education Report BOARD OF EDUCATION 215-16 Colleen Burton, President Dianne Laura, Vice President Tammy Bonifield, Secretary
More informationSpecial Educational Needs School Information Report
Special Educational Needs School Information Report At Holy Trinity Primary School we strive to support all children to enable them to achieve at school. In order to do this many steps are taken to support
More information5 Early years providers
5 Early years providers What this chapter covers This chapter explains the action early years providers should take to meet their duties in relation to identifying and supporting all children with special
More informationBureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION A Framework for Continuous School Improvement Planning (Summer 2009) GETTING RESULTS Continuous School Improvement Plan Gen 6-2 Year Plan Required for Schools in School
More informationCLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction
CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1 Program Name: Macmillan/McGraw Hill Reading 2003 Date of Publication: 2003 Publisher: Macmillan/McGraw Hill Reviewer Code: 1. X The program meets
More informationKannapolis City Schools 100 DENVER STREET KANNAPOLIS, NC
POSITION Kannapolis City Schools 100 DENVER STREET KANNAPOLIS, NC 28083-3609 QUALIFICATIONS 704-938-1131 FAX: 704-938-1137 http://www.kannapolis.k12.nc.us HMResources@vnet.net SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST
More informationReviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND
Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND Bewdley Primary School is committed to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children and young people and expects
More informationOccupational Therapist (Temporary Position)
Edmonton Catholic Schools is now accepting applications for the position of Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position) Edmonton Catholic Schools is a large urban school district whose mission is to provide
More informationYour Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities
Your Guide to Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities Why a Pivot Plan? In order to tailor our model of Whole-School Reform to recent changes seen at the federal level
More informationImplementation Science and the Roll-out of the Head Start Program Performance Standards
Implementation Science and the Roll-out of the Head Start Program Performance Standards Region V Head Start Program Performance Standards Plenary Sarah M. Semlak, Ph.D. Director of Coordination and Collaboration
More informationState Parental Involvement Plan
A Toolkit for Title I Parental Involvement Section 3 Tools Page 41 Tool 3.1: State Parental Involvement Plan Description This tool serves as an example of one SEA s plan for supporting LEAs and schools
More informationSection 6 DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES
Section 6 DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES Area: DISCIPLINE - STUDENTS NOT YET ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION AND RELATED SERVICES Introduction: A student who has not yet been determined to be eligible for special
More informationUsing CBM for Progress Monitoring in Reading. Lynn S. Fuchs and Douglas Fuchs
Using CBM for Progress Monitoring in Reading Lynn S. Fuchs and Douglas Fuchs Introduction to Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) What is Progress Monitoring? Progress monitoring focuses on individualized
More informationAimsweb Fluency Norms Chart
Aimsweb Fluency Norms Chart Free PDF ebook Download: Aimsweb Fluency Norms Chart Download or Read Online ebook aimsweb fluency norms chart in PDF Format From The Best User Guide Database AIMSweb Norms.
More informationSystemic Improvement in the State Education Agency
Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency A Rubric-Based Tool to Develop Implement the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Achieve an Integrated Approach to Serving All Students Continuously
More informationPractices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois
Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois Summary of the Practice. Step Up to High School is a four-week transitional summer program for incoming ninth-graders in Chicago Public Schools.
More informationAcademic and Behavioral Response to Intervention
ABRI in ACTION Susan Robertson ssrobe03@louisville.edu Meghan Martin mehgan.mar5n@louisville.edu Ruth Esterle Maryville Elem Kaet Barron Maryville Elem Ragan Knuckles Waco Elem Academic and Behavioral
More informationReynolds School District Literacy Framework
Reynolds School District Literacy Framework Developed through 2012-2014 by Reynolds School District Teachers representing General Education, English Language Learners, Special Education, and Title I from
More informationCORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16
SUBJECT: Career and Technical Education GRADE LEVEL: 9, 10, 11, 12 COURSE TITLE: COURSE CODE: 8909010 Introduction to the Teaching Profession CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
More informationEFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS
EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS Jennifer Head, Ed.S Math and Least Restrictive Environment Instructional Coach Department
More informationUniversity of South Florida 1
Expanding PBIS into Classrooms: The Fundamentals University of South Florida 11 th Annual This product was developed by Florida s Positive Support Project through the University of South Florida, Louis
More informationSpecial Education Services Program/Service Descriptions
Special Education Services Program/Service Descriptions SES Program/Service Characteristics Specially Designed Instruction Level Class Size Autism (AU) A developmental disability significantly affecting
More informationCooper Upper Elementary School
LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS www.livoniapublicschools.org/cooper 213-214 BOARD OF EDUCATION 213-14 Mark Johnson, President Colleen Burton, Vice President Dianne Laura, Secretary Tammy Bonifield, Trustee Dan
More informationCurriculum Vitae of. JOHN W. LIEDEL, M.D. Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrician
Updated July 07, 2009 of JOHN W. LIEDEL, M.D. Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrician EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Children's Program 7707 SW Capitol Hwy. 97219 August 1987 - Present The Children's
More informationCollaborative Classroom Co-Teaching in Inclusive Settings Course Outline
Collaborative Classroom Co-Teaching in Inclusive Settings Course Outline Course Description The purpose of this course is to provide educators with a strong foundation for planning, implementing and maintaining
More informationTEAM Evaluation Model Overview
TEAM Evaluation Model Overview Evaluation closely links with Common Core Student Readiness for Postsecondary Education and the Workforce WHY we teach Common Core State Standards provide a vision of excellence
More informationAnswer Key To Geometry Houghton Mifflin Company
Answer Key To Geometry Company Free PDF ebook Download: Answer Key To Geometry Company Download or Read Online ebook answer key to geometry houghton mifflin company in PDF Format From The Best User Guide
More informationDescription of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds
Program Report Codes (PRC) A program report code (PRC) is an accounting term and is used for the allocation and accounting of funds. The PRCs (allocations) may change from year to year depending on the
More informationA Framework for Safe and Successful Schools
A Framework for Safe and Successful Schools Kelly M. Vaillancourt, Ph.D, NCSP Sally A. Baas, Ed.D Click to edit subtitle style Click to edit subtitle style Click to edit subtitle style Click to edit subtitle
More informationTexas First Fluency Folder For First Grade
Texas First Fluency Folder For First Grade Free PDF ebook Download: Texas First Fluency Folder For First Grade Download or Read Online ebook texas first fluency folder for first grade in PDF Format From
More informationSOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL
SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL Kyle Higgins Randall Boone University of Nevada Las Vegas rboone@unlv.nevada.edu Higgins@unlv.nevada.edu N.B. This form has not been fully validated and is still in development.
More information