Fullhurst Community College
|
|
- Arlene Blair
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Fullhurst Community College Student survey report September 2014 In case of enquiries please contact Kirkland Rowell Surveys by ing Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited. Kirkland Rowell is part of GL Assessment, a division of the GL Education Group. Report generated on 12//2014
2 Student survey report Contents Page 1. Executive summary An overview of findings for this survey with comparison to the previous survey if applicable. 2. Key results Satisfaction levels for academic, non-academic and additional criteria Student priorities Importance ratings and priorities for improvement Parent View : Student summary Your survey data linked to the 12 questions in Ofsted s Parent View ASCL self-evaluation summary Linking your survey data to the current evaluation schedule Unexpected results Highlighting any particularly unusual or unexpected results Standard analysis Analysis of all remaining data which may include gender analysis,healthy lifestyle, home environment, values and homework group analysis group scores compared to national averages Time series analysis Trends for surveyed criteria over time. 76. Appendix Supplementary data and further information. 84 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 2 of 91
3 Student survey report Executive summary Executive summary This report details the findings of the fourth Kirkland Rowell Student Survey for Fullhurst Community College. The report measures the levels of satisfaction among the students for a range of criteria, which have been previously identified as being important to the parents of school students, as well as for the core subjects, taught at the school. The report measures the relative importance of the criteria surveyed, as well as providing results tables that identify the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the school in the year to September The report also measures performance with regard to overall satisfaction and improvement. Summary of results for this survey 380 completed questionnaires were returned representing a response rate of 43.7%. The response meant that meaningful data could be drawn for all criteria except for Psychology. The students gave an excellent overall performance score (75.8%) (see page 6). Among the students who had been attending the school for over a year, 59% said the school had improved over the last year and 22% thought that the school s performance was worse (see page 50). With regard to academic subjects, the highest proportion of students who said they were making good progress was for French, Music and Religious Studies. The highest proportion of students who said they were not making good progress was for Hospitality, Film Studies and History. With regard to non-academic areas, students awarded the highest scores for the delivery of School facilities, Community spirit and School discipline. The students awarded the lowest scores for the delivery of Levels of homework, School security and Developing potential. The students' top priorities for improvement are Control of bullying, Choice of subjects and Exam results. The male students gave significantly higher scores for Promoting racial harmony. The female students gave significantly higher scores for Music, Physical Education, English, Art, Geography, Food Technology, French, Drama, Religious Studies, Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress, Celebrating and rewarding achievement, Quality of school management, Encouraging and listening to parent views and Encouraging and listening to pupil views. Summary of results since the previous survey The following academic areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: French, Art and Business Studies. The following non-academic areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: Community spirit, Developing confidence, Teaching quality, Control of bullying, Careers advice, Social health education, Truancy control, Developing moral values, Choice of subjects and Caring teachers. The following non-academic areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: Quality of school management, Regular marking of work, Treating all pupils fairly and equally, Extra curricular activities, Encouraging and listening to parent views, Encouraging local community activity and Encouraging and listening to pupil views. Summary of results over more than two surveys The following academic areas received significantly higher scores over more than two surveys: Mathematics, French, Music and Physical Education. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 3 of 91
4 Student survey report Executive summary The following non-academic areas received significantly higher scores over more than two surveys: Exam results and Truancy control. The following additional area received significantly higher scores over more than two surveys: Extra curricular activities. The survey has achieved a good benchmark of performance against which future academic years might be compared. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 4 of 91
5 Student survey report Executive summary Strengths and weaknesses The results below are the areas in which the school has the highest and lowest perceived standards of performance. Gold represents outstanding, green is good, black is room for improvement and red attention advised. Criterion scores in blue are only reliable to within 1 and scores in pink should only be considered indicative. Relative strengths for academic criteria 1.2% French 99.5% Music 96.6% Religious Studies 95.5% Mathematics 95.4% Engineering Relative weaknesses for academic criteria 82.9% Hospitality 86.2% Film Studies 88.1% History 88.7% Health & Social Care 88.7% English Relative strengths for non-academic criteria Importance Ranking 4.1% School facilities (57.) 7th 96.4% Community spirit (35.5%) 19th 88.5% School discipline (78.7%) 1st 87.7% Developing confidence (39.4%) 15th 87.2% Teaching quality (57.1%) 6th Relative weaknesses for non-academic criteria Importance Ranking 75.8% Levels of homework (52.4%) 8th 76.1% School security (66.6%) 3rd 76.9% Developing potential (41.2%) 14th 77.9% Caring teachers (43.3%) 12th 77.9% Exam results (62.) 5th Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 5 of 91
6 Student survey report Executive summary Response to survey 380 completed questionnaires were returned representing a response rate of 43.7%. Proportion of responses (%) Number of responses Responses from male students Responses from female students Responses from 7 students Responses from 8 students Responses from 9 students Responses from students Responses from students Overall student satisfaction This survey (%) Previous survey (%) Change (%) Overall, rate the performance of the school Overall student satisfaction 5 53% % 1 1% Very poor Poor Neither Good Very good More students rate the overall performance of the school as good or very good. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 6 of 91
7 Student survey report Executive summary Overall performance scores broken down by gender and year group Overall performance scores broken down by gender % 76% 76% % All students Male students Female students This survey Last survey The students gave an excellent overall performance score of 75.8%, improved since the last survey. Male students scored the overall performance of the school broadly in line with female students. Overall performance scores broken down by year group 9 86% 86% 87% 7 77% 77% 78% 68% 71% 66% 71% 69% 73% 79% 75% All students Male students Female students 7 students scored the highest overall from other year groups and are therefore most satisfied with the school s performance. 7 male students and female students scored the highest overall from other year groups and are therefore most satisfied with the school s performance. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 7 of 91
8 Student survey report Executive summary Time series analysis of overall performance scores Graph showing the overall performance scores trend broken down over time. 9 77% 76% 7 66% There was no significant change over four surveys for the overall performance score. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 8 of 91
9 Student survey report Executive summary Students recommend this school broken down by gender and year group Recommend this school scores broken down by gender % 9 78% 77% 78% 83% All students Male students Female students This survey Last survey 85.7% of students said they would recommend this school to another student. Male students would recommend this school to another student more than female students. Recommend this school scores broken down by year group 96% 98% 94% % 78% 76% 88% 85% 86% 82% 82% 83% 73% All students Male students Female students 7 students would recommend this school to another student more than other year groups. 8 male students and female students would recommend this school to another student more than other year groups. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 9 of 91
10 Student survey report Key results Key results The core analysis of your survey data; proportions making progress in academic subjects and satisfaction levels in non-academic and additional criteria. Explanations have been provided to help you to interpret your results. Interpreting results For the sake of assessment in most schools, academic questions receiving a score of: Over 9 are 'outstanding' (above the gold line) to 89.9% are 'good' (above the green line) 75% to 79.9% indicate 'room for improvement' (above the red line) Below 75% indicates 'attention advised' (below the red line) Non-academic and additional questions receiving a score of: Over are 'outstanding' (above the gold line) 7 to 79.9% are 'good' (above the green line) 65% to 69.9% indicate 'room for improvement' (above the red line) Below 65% indicates 'attention advised' (below the red line) Weighted scores In the results tables the scores achieved are given as a percentage. A full explanation of how true/false responses were converted to percentages is given on our website. As there is a measurable bias in the way that students score criteria, it is necessary to create weighted scores so that the score for any one criterion might be compared meaningfully with the score for any other criterion on a level playing field. These weighted scores are calculated based upon the average scores achieved from over 190 similar, English schools. Results quoted from the previous survey, if applicable, may show small differences from those originally given, as the weightings applied change slightly from one year to the next. Statistical reliability Generally all of our results are quoted as being reliable to within less than 5% at the 95% confidence level. Where this is not possible due to the sample achieved, results are quoted as reliable to within less than 1 at the 95% confidence level and are highlighted in blue. Occasionally when results are even less reliable we show an indicative result and highlight in pink. Where there are fewer than responses we only show low response and no further result is quoted. For further information see our website for details. Criteria which have not yet been surveyed in at least 30 schools do not yet have an average figure, and therefore, these scores cannot be weighted against what students parents usually say. These un-weighted scores are marked *. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page of 91
11 Student survey report Key results Understanding your results table Your results are shown as a weighted score. This is a calculation applied to your raw results using the average scores achieved from over 190 similar, English schools. It allows each criterion to be compared meaningfully on a level playing field. This score can be over. The previous survey results may appear to differ slightly from your original report last year. This is because the weighting calculation applied changes slightly from one year to the next. Academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change Scores above ICTthe gold line are outstanding. French Religious Education Physical Education Only highlighted changes should Music 82.1 be 78.3 considered significant +3.8 a Food Technology 81.4 green highlight shows a significant improvement, a red highlight shows Scores above History the green 80.8 a significant 75.0 decline, since +5.8 the last line are good. Mathematics 80.1 survey Geography Business Studies 77.2 Design Technology Scores above Artthe red line indicate Textiles 'room for 76.3 improvement'. English Russian * 74.3 Science Drama Engineering 59.5 Psychology * This criteria has not yet been surveyed in at least 30 schools. As such we do not have an average figure and therefore cannot weight this score against what students parents usually say. Scores below the red line indicate 'attention advised'. Low response Low response indicates that there were fewer than responses. Subject scores in blue are only reliable to within 1 due to the sample achieved. Subject scores in pink should only be considered indicative due to a low sample size, or high polarisation. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page of 91
12 Student survey report Key results Academic criteria The following table shows weighted proportion of students making progress for all academic subjects taught within the school. Where data is available, these are compared to the same score from the previous year s survey, and the percentage change shown. Only highlighted changes should be considered significant. Academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change French Music Religious Studies Mathematics Engineering 95.4 Art Business Studies Citizenship Philosophy and Ethics 92.3 Geography ICT 91.9 Physical Education Science Drama Food Technology English Health & Social Care 88.7 History Film Studies Hospitality 82.9 Psychology Low response Student progress in the following academic subjects has been judged as outstanding : French, Music, Religious Studies, Mathematics, Engineering, Art, Business Studies, Citizenship, Philosophy and Ethics, Geography, ICT, Physical Education and Science. Student progress in the following academic subjects has been judged as good : Drama, Food Technology, English, Health & Social Care, History, Film Studies and Hospitality. The proportion of students making progress in the following academic subjects has shown significant improvement since the previous survey: French, Art and Business Studies. The following academic subject achieved a low sample; therefore scores are only reliable within 1: Religious Studies, Drama, Food Technology and Health & Social Care. The following academic subject achieved a very low sample; therefore scores should only be considered indicative: Engineering, Business Studies, Philosophy and Ethics, Film Studies and Hospitality. Previous survey data cannot be provided for comparison for the following subjects: Engineering, Philosophy and Ethics, ICT, Health & Social Care and Hospitality. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 12 of 91
13 Student survey report Key results Non-academic criteria The following table shows the scores given by students for non-academic areas. Where data is available, these are compared to the same score from the previous year s survey, and the percentage change shown. Only highlighted changes should be considered significant. Non-academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change School facilities Community spirit School discipline Developing confidence Teaching quality Availability of resources Control of bullying Careers advice Social health education School communication Happiness of child Truancy control Developing moral values Computer access Choice of subjects Exam results Caring teachers Developing potential School security Levels of homework Student scores in the following non-academic criteria have been judged as outstanding : School facilities, Community spirit, School discipline, Developing confidence, Teaching quality, Availability of resources, Control of bullying, Careers advice, Social health education, School communication, Happiness of child and Truancy control. Student scores in the following non-academic criteria have been judged as good : Developing moral values, Computer access, Choice of subjects, Exam results, Caring teachers, Developing potential, School security and Levels of homework. The scores given by students in the following non-academic criteria have shown significant improvement since the previous survey: Community spirit, Developing confidence, Teaching quality, Control of bullying, Careers advice, Social health education, Truancy control, Developing moral values, Choice of subjects and Caring teachers. The following non-academic criteria achieved a low sample; therefore scores are only reliable within 1: Community spirit. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 13 of 91
14 Student survey report Key results Additional criteria Additional criteria were chosen by the school, and investigated with regard to student satisfaction. The following results were achieved with regard to those students who answered the question. The percentage scores are given in descending order. Only highlighted changes should be considered significant. Additional criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change Regular marking of work Treating all pupils fairly and equally Encouraging local community activity Encouraging and listening to pupil views Quality of school management Encouraging and listening to parent views Explaining to parents how to help their child Handling complaints Extra curricular activities Celebrating and rewarding achievement Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress Promoting racial harmony Unexpected costs/expenses* Teaching for special needs Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Student scores in the following additional criteria have been judged as outstanding : Regular marking of work, Treating all pupils fairly and equally, Encouraging local community activity, Encouraging and listening to pupil views, Quality of school management, Encouraging and listening to parent views and Explaining to parents how to help their child. Student scores in the following additional criteria have been judged as good : Handling complaints, Extra curricular activities, Celebrating and rewarding achievement, Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress, Promoting racial harmony, Unexpected costs/expenses, Teaching for special needs and Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability. The scores given by students in the following additional criteria have shown significant improvement since the previous survey: Regular marking of work, Treating all pupils fairly and equally, Encouraging local community activity, Encouraging and listening to pupil views, Quality of school management, Encouraging and listening to parent views and Extra curricular activities. The following additional criteria have not been surveyed in at least 30 schools so we do not yet have an average figure, and therefore, these scores cannot be weighted against what students usually say: Unexpected costs/expenses. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 14 of 91
15 Student survey report Student priorities Student priorities Students were asked to choose the ten criteria which were most important to them from a list of twenty. This section shows the analysis of these importance ratings and of the priorities for improvement. Student priorities importance Ideally those criteria which are most important to students will be the criteria to which students award the highest scores. In the following table, the second column shows the percentage of students who chose each of the criteria as one of their ten choices of what they felt was most important to them. The third column shows how well the school performs for the criteria ie. 1st = what the school does best, 20th = what the school does least well. Only highlighted rankings should be considered as being worthy of note. A green highlight shows that the school performs well within a criterion that is important to students, a red highlight shows that the school performs less well within a criterion that is important to students. The final two columns show the same information for the previous survey, for comparison. Criteria Importance score (%) Satisfaction ranking Previous importance score (%) Previous satisfaction ranking School discipline rd th Control of bullying th th School security th 69.7 th Happiness of child 66.2 th th Exam results th th Teaching quality th th School facilities st st Levels of homework th th Careers advice th th Social health education th th Choice of subjects th th Caring teachers th th Truancy control th th Developing potential th th Developing confidence th th Availability of resources th rd Computer access th 33.5 th School communication 35.8 th th Community spirit nd nd Developing moral values th th With regard to the five criteria most important to students: The school performs well in: School discipline. The school performs less well in: School security and Exam results. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 15 of 91
16 Student survey report Student priorities Importance: your school vs. similar schools Students were asked to choose ten priorities from a list of twenty criteria. The table below shows which criteria the students from your school selected as most important. The second column shows you the percentage of students who selected each criterion as one of their ten choices, and the final column compares your school s data to the views from students from similar schools. Position differences of six or more have been highlighted as being worthy of note. Criteria Importance score (%) Importance ranking Average ranking for similar schools Ranking difference to similar schools School discipline st 4th +3 Control of bullying nd 3rd +1 School security rd 2nd -1 Happiness of child th 1st -3 Exam results th 5th 0 Teaching quality th 7th +1 School facilities th 6th -1 Levels of homework th 12th +4 Careers advice th 8th -1 Social health education 46.8 th 15th +5 Choice of subjects 46.0 th 9th -2 Caring teachers th th -2 Truancy control th 17th +4 Developing potential th th -3 Developing confidence th 13th -2 Availability of resources th 16th +1 Computer access th 14th -3 School communication th 18th 0 Community spirit th 20th +1 Developing moral values th 19th -1 Most of the criteria the students from your school selected as important are in line with the criteria that students of similar schools select as important. Students from your school selected the following criteria as more important than students at similar schools: Levels of homework, Social health education and Truancy control. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 16 of 91
17 Student survey report Student priorities How priorities change as students get older The graph below shows which criteria 7 students selected as important compared to which criteria parents of & students selected as important. This shows us how priorities change as the students get older. The table shows the criteria where there is a significant difference between the two groups Student priorities School discipline Control of bullying School security Exam results Happiness of child Levels of homework School facilities Social health education Teaching quality School communication Caring teachers Computer access Choice of subjects Community spirit Availability of resources Truancy control Developing moral values Developing confidence Developing potential Careers advice 7 & Criteria where difference in ranking is six or more 7 ranking & ranking Social health education 8th 16th School communication th 18th Computer access 12th 19th Community spirit 13th 20th Availability of resources 15th 8th Developing potential 19th th Careers advice 20th 8th Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 17 of 91
18 Student survey report Student priorities How priorities change by gender of student The graph below shows which criteria female students selected as important compared to which criteria male students selected as important. This shows us how priorities change by gender of the student. The table shows the criteria where there is a significant difference between the two groups Student priorities School discipline Control of bullying School security Happiness of child Exam results Teaching quality School facilities Levels of homework Social health education Careers advice Caring teachers Community spirit Choice of subjects Computer access Availability of resources Developing potential Truancy control Developing moral values Developing confidence School communication Male students Female students Criteria where difference in ranking is six or more Male students ranking Female students ranking Community spirit 12th 19th Developing moral values 18th 20th Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 18 of 91
19 Student survey report Student priorities Relative student priorities for improvement Student priorities are shown below compared to student priorities in similar schools. The school s previous years figures are also provided for comparison. Criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) Similar schools (%) Control of bullying Choice of subjects Exam results School discipline Happiness of child Levels of homework Computer access Teaching quality School facilities Availability of resources Developing potential Careers advice Developing confidence School security Truancy control School communication Community spirit Social health education Developing moral values Caring teachers Students have given a higher priority to the following areas since the last survey: Control of bullying. Students have given a lower priority to the following areas since the last survey: Developing confidence. Students have given a higher priority to the following areas compared to similar schools: Control of bullying. Students have given a lower priority to the following areas compared to similar schools: School facilities. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 19 of 91
20 Student survey report Parent View : Student summary Parent View : Student summary Below are the twelve "Parent View" questions. For each of the questions, we have given the weighted student scores for any relevant criteria included on your questionnaire. In terms of student perceptions Gold represents outstanding, green is good, black requires improvement and red is inadequate. Score Sample 1. My child is happy at this school Happiness of child 80.4% My child feels safe at this school Control of bullying 86.3% 331 School security 76.1% My child makes good progress at this school Developing potential 76.9% 344 Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% My child is well looked after at this school Caring teachers 77.9% 344 School security 76.1% My child is taught well at this school Teaching quality 87.2% 343 Exam results 77.9% 340 Developing potential 76.9% 344 Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% 346 Teaching for special needs 74.2% 341 Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% My child receives appropriate homework for their age Respondents saying 'Right' for homework amount Requires improvement 380 Levels of homework 75.8% 342 Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% 344 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 20 of 91
21 Student survey report Parent View : Student summary Score Sample 7. This school ensures the pupils are well behaved School discipline 88.5% This school deals effectively with bullying Control of bullying 86.3% Quality of school management Quality of school management This school responds well to any concern I raise Encouraging and listening to parent views 80.7% 339 Handling complaints 79.7% 343 Caring teachers 77.9% 344. I receive valuable information from the school about my child's progress Regular marking of work 95.1% 341 Explaining to parents how to help their child 80.2% I would recommend this school to another parent Recommended 85.7% 276 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 21 of 91
22 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary ASCL Self-evaluation summary The September 2012 ASCL evaluation schedule asserts the increased importance of a school s own self evaluation data as the starting point of the inspection process. The following evidence summary is presented to allow schools to summarise their inspection self evaluation evidence under the four main judgements: Achievement, Teaching, Behaviour & Safety and Leadership. Also, the school s promotion of Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development (SMSC) is included, along with Overall Effectiveness. The evidence given here is only that achieved from this survey; it is vital that your evidence summary for ASCL also considers any other evidence that you have gathered, either from other surveys or from internal measurement and observation. The Judgement areas, plus an overall summary, are broken down into sub-criteria. Scores of 1 to 4 represent ratings of Outstanding, Good, Requires improvement, and Inadequate, as used by ASCL. Where any area is found to be Inadequate then this rating will be given for the section as a whole. Criteria where evidence was indicative rather than reliable are once again given in pink. Remember, for grading comparisons with our colour coded system: Gold = Outstanding = Grade 1 Green = Good = Grade 2 Black = Requires improvement = Grade 3 Red = Inadequate = Grade 4 It is now also possible to have split grades. If your grade is close to the boundary above, this is indicated with a + (plus). If your grade is close to the boundary below, this is indicated with a - (minus). We show the strengths and weaknesses in each sub-section, where appropriate; where there are fewer than four criteria, these are not shown. Red criteria cannot be shown as strengths; gold criteria cannot be shown as weaknesses. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 22 of 91
23 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Achievement Pupils' learning and progress overall Average of academic subject ratings Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Exam results 77.9% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Strengths Average of academic subject ratings Developing confidence Weaknesses Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Teaching for special needs Your average student grade for this section = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Groups progress Your own assessment is required here. Subject / Key Stage progress Academic criteria improving since previous surveys Good Your average student grade for this section = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 23 of 91
24 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Skills - Reading, Writing, Communications and Mathematics across the curriculum Mathematics 95.5% Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding English 88.7% Good Choice of subjects 78.3% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Strengths Mathematics Developing confidence Weaknesses Teaching for special needs Developing potential Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Attainment and closing gaps Mathematics 95.5% Outstanding English 88.7% Good Exam results 77.9% Good Your average student grade for this section = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Summary grade Achievement section Your average student grade for "Achievement" = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) To reach the next grade In order to reach the next grade (Outstanding), the school needs to improve anything with a score below the next grade border, and maintain or improve other criteria. In this instance, the school needs to improve the following sections: Pupils' learning and progress overall Subject / Key Stage progress Skills - Reading, Writing, Communications and Mathematics across the curriculum Attainment and closing gaps Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 24 of 91
25 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Quality of teaching at the school Teaching overall Average of academic subject ratings Outstanding Strengths 1.2%French 99.5% Music 96.6% Religious Studies Weaknesses 82.9% Hospitality 86.2% Film Studies 88.1% History Your average student grade for this section = 1.0 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Pupils' progress and learning Average of academic subject ratings Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Exam results 77.9% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Strengths Average of academic subject ratings Developing confidence Weaknesses Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Teaching for special needs Your average student grade for this section = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 25 of 91
26 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Climate for learning Regular marking of work 95.1% Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Teaching quality 87.2% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding Celebrating and rewarding achievement 78.3% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Strengths Regular marking of work Developing confidence Weaknesses Developing potential Celebrating and rewarding achievement Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Teachers' expectations Developing potential 76.9% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Levels of homework 75.8% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Strengths Developing potential Weaknesses Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Your average student grade for this section = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 26 of 91
27 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Teachers' planning and strategies Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Celebrating and rewarding achievement 78.3% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Levels of homework 75.8% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Strengths Developing confidence Celebrating and rewarding achievement Weaknesses Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Teaching for special needs Your average student grade for this section = 1.9 = Good = Grade 2 Interventions and support Your own assessment is required here. Teaching of RWCM Mathematics 95.5% Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding English 88.7% Good Strengths Mathematics Weaknesses English Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 27 of 91
28 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Assessment Teaching quality 87.2% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Strengths Teaching quality Treating all pupils fairly and equally Weaknesses Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Teaching for special needs Your average student grade for this section = 1.5 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Marking, feedback and homework Regular marking of work 95.1% Outstanding School communication 82.4% Outstanding Explaining to parents how to help their child 80.2% Outstanding Celebrating and rewarding achievement 78.3% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Levels of homework 75.8% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Analysis of homework amount Requires improvement Strengths Regular marking of work School communication Explaining to parents how to help their child Weaknesses Analysis of homework amount Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Levels of homework Your average student grade for this section = 1.8 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Summary grade Quality of teaching at the school section Your average student grade for "Quality of teaching at the school" = 1.5 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 28 of 91
29 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary To reach the next grade In order to reach the next grade (Outstanding), the school needs to improve anything with a score below the next grade border, and maintain or improve other criteria. In this instance, the school needs to improve the following sections: Pupils' progress and learning Teachers' expectations Teachers' planning and strategies Marking, feedback and homework Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 29 of 91
30 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Behaviour and safety of pupils at the school Climate for learning Regular marking of work 95.1% Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Teaching quality 87.2% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding Celebrating and rewarding achievement 78.3% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Strengths Regular marking of work Developing confidence Weaknesses Developing potential Celebrating and rewarding achievement Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 30 of 91
31 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Parents', staff and pupils' views of behaviour and safety School discipline 88.5% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding School communication 82.4% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to parent views 80.7% Outstanding Developing moral values 78.7% Good School security 76.1% Good Promoting racial harmony 75.7% Good Strengths School discipline Treating all pupils fairly and equally Control of bullying Weaknesses Promoting racial harmony School security Developing moral values Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Pupils' behaviour Community spirit 96.4% Outstanding School discipline 88.5% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding Developing moral values 78.7% Good Promoting racial harmony 75.7% Good Strengths Community spirit School discipline Weaknesses Promoting racial harmony Developing moral values Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 31 of 91
32 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Safety and mutual support Community spirit 96.4% Outstanding Citizenship 93.2% Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding Social health education 83.5% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding School communication 82.4% Outstanding Caring teachers 77.9% Good School security 76.1% Good Promoting racial harmony 75.7% Good Strengths Community spirit Citizenship Developing confidence Weaknesses Promoting racial harmony School security Caring teachers Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) School systems for behaviour management Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding School communication 82.4% Outstanding Quality of school management 81. Outstanding Truancy control 80.2% Outstanding School security 76.1% Good Strengths Treating all pupils fairly and equally Control of bullying Weaknesses School security Your average student grade for this section = 1.2 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 32 of 91
33 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Bullying Community spirit 96.4% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding Developing moral values 78.7% Good Caring teachers 77.9% Good School security 76.1% Good Promoting racial harmony 75.7% Good Strengths Community spirit Control of bullying Weaknesses Promoting racial harmony School security Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Attendance Truancy control 80.2% Outstanding Your average student grade for this section = 1.0 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Summary grade Behaviour and safety of pupils at the school section Your average student grade for "Behaviour and safety of pupils at the school" = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) In order to continue to be Outstanding, the school needs to maintain or improve all criteria. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 33 of 91
34 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Quality of leadership and management of the school Impact on outcomes; improvement Criteria improving since previous surveys Ratio of pupils saying school improving versus declining Significant improvements versus significant declines Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Summary of results since the previous survey The following academic areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: French, Art and Business Studies. The following non-academic areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: Community spirit, Developing confidence, Teaching quality, Control of bullying, Careers advice, Social health education, Truancy control, Developing moral values, Choice of subjects and Caring teachers. The following additional areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: Quality of school management, Regular marking of work, Treating all pupils fairly and equally, Extra curricular activities, Encouraging and listening to parent views, Encouraging local community activity and Encouraging and listening to pupil views. Summary of results over more than two surveys The following academic areas received significantly higher scores than the last three surveys: Mathematics, French, Music and Physical Education. The following non-academic areas received significantly higher scores than the last three surveys: Exam results and Truancy control. The following additional area received significantly higher scores than the last three surveys: Extra curricular activities. Your average student grade for this section = 1.0 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 34 of 91
35 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Impact on teaching and learning School facilities 4.1% Outstanding Regular marking of work 95.1% Outstanding Teaching quality 87.2% Outstanding Availability of resources 87.1% Outstanding Truancy control 80.2% Outstanding Extra curricular activities 78.7% Good Computer access 78.4% Good Exam results 77.9% Good Caring teachers 77.9% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Levels of homework 75.8% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Strengths School facilities Regular marking of work Teaching quality Weaknesses Teaching for special needs Levels of homework Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Performance management and professional development For these categories, please see your Kirkland Rowell Staff Survey, where available. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 35 of 91
36 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Curriculum Mathematics 95.5% Outstanding Citizenship 93.2% Outstanding Teaching quality 87.2% Outstanding Careers advice 85.1% Outstanding Social health education 83.5% Outstanding English 88.7% Good Choice of subjects 78.3% Good Exam results 77.9% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Strengths Mathematics Citizenship Teaching quality Weaknesses Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Teaching for special needs Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Literacy English 88.7% Good Your average student grade for this section = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2 Self-evaluation Commitment to self-evaluation programme Range of self-evaluation programme Rigour of surveys - ability to identify weakness and improvement Outstanding Outstanding Good Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Expectations ambition Your own assessment is required here. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 36 of 91
37 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Engagement with parents and carers Citizenship 93.2% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding School communication 82.4% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to parent views 80.7% Outstanding Explaining to parents how to help their child 80.2% Outstanding Caring teachers 77.9% Good Strengths Citizenship Encouraging and listening to pupil views Weaknesses Caring teachers Your average student grade for this section = 1.2 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Governance Commitment to self-evaluation programme Criteria improving since previous surveys Range of self-evaluation programme Ratio of pupils saying school improving versus declining Significant improvements versus significant declines Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Availability of resources 87.1% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding School communication 82.4% Outstanding Quality of school management 81. Outstanding Encouraging and listening to parent views 80.7% Outstanding Rigour of surveys - ability to identify weakness and improvement Good Strengths Commitment to self-evaluation programme Criteria improving since previous surveys Range of self-evaluation programme Weaknesses Rigour of surveys - ability to identify weakness and improvement Your average student grade for this section = 1.1 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 37 of 91
38 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Safeguarding Community spirit 96.4% Outstanding Citizenship 93.2% Outstanding School discipline 88.5% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding Social health education 83.5% Outstanding Quality of school management 81. Outstanding Truancy control 80.2% Outstanding Developing moral values 78.7% Good Caring teachers 77.9% Good School security 76.1% Good Promoting racial harmony 75.7% Good Strengths Community spirit Citizenship School discipline Weaknesses Promoting racial harmony School security Caring teachers Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Summary grade Quality of leadership and management of the school section Your average student grade for "Quality of leadership and management of the school" = 1.4 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) In order to continue to be Outstanding, the school needs to maintain or improve all criteria. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 38 of 91
39 Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development The school's promotion of students' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is an element of the new framework, but there is no separate judgement and no specific criteria for evaluation. It is included here (as in the ASCL guidance) as an extra tool to help schools to evaluate the quality and impact of their SMSC work. Personal insight and spiritual development Music 99.5% Outstanding Religious Studies 96.6% Outstanding Art 95.2% Outstanding Drama 89.1% Good English 88.7% Good Developing moral values 78.7% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Strengths Music Religious Studies Weaknesses Developing potential Developing moral values Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Moral understanding and relationships Community spirit 96.4% Outstanding Citizenship 93.2% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding Social health education 83.5% Outstanding Developing moral values 78.7% Good Promoting racial harmony 75.7% Good Strengths Community spirit Citizenship Weaknesses Promoting racial harmony Developing moral values Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 39 of 91
St Philip Howard Catholic School
School report St Philip Howard Catholic School St Mary's Road, Glossop, SK13 8DR Inspection dates 4 November 1 December 2014 Overall effectiveness Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3 This inspection:
More informationOasis Academy Coulsdon
School report Oasis Academy Coulsdon Homefield Road, Old Coulsdon, Croydon, CR5 1ES Inspection dates 4-5 March 2015 Overall effectiveness Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Leadership
More informationEastbury Primary School
Eastbury Primary School Dawson Avenue, Barking, IG11 9QQ Inspection dates 26 27 September 2012 Overall effectiveness Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement
More informationSt Michael s Catholic Primary School
St Michael s Catholic Primary School Inspection report Unique Reference Number 10477 Local Authority Wolverhampton Inspection number 77076 Inspection dates 19 20 September 2011 Reporting inspector Sharona
More informationPutnoe Primary School
School report Putnoe Primary School Church Lane, Bedford, MK41 0DH Inspection dates 20 21 May 2015 Overall effectiveness Previous inspection: Outstanding 1 This inspection: Good 2 Leadership and management
More informationNewlands Girls School
School report Newlands Girls School Farm Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5JB Inspection dates 02-03 October 2012 Overall effectiveness Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of
More informationInspection dates Overall effectiveness Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school
School report Odessa Infant School Wellington Road, Forest Gate, London E7 9BY Inspection dates 25 26 May 2016 Overall effectiveness Effectiveness of leadership and management Quality of teaching, learning
More informationAllington Primary School Inspection report - amended
Allington Primary School Inspection report - amended Unique Reference Number Local Authority Inspection number Inspection date Reporting inspector 8855 Kent 3269 9 November 2008 Kevin Hodge This inspection
More informationArchdiocese of Birmingham
Archdiocese of Birmingham INSPECTION REPORT THE GIFFARD CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL WOLVERHAMPTON Inspection dates 25 th -26 th June 2013 Reporting Inspector Paul Nutt Inspection carried out under Section
More informationAlma Primary School. School report. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. Inspection dates March 2015
School report Alma Primary School Alma Road, Enfield, EN3 4UQ Inspection dates 11 12 March 2015 Overall effectiveness Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3 This inspection: Good 2 Leadership and
More informationShort inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ
Ofsted Piccadilly Gate Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted 23 December 2016 Mrs Helen Gill Headteacher Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ 34 Phoenix Road London
More informationUK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions
UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions November 2012 The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) has
More informationEffective Pre-school and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11)
Effective Pre-school and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11) A longitudinal study funded by the DfES (2003 2008) Exploring pupils views of primary school in Year 5 Address for correspondence: EPPSE
More informationCentre for Evaluation & Monitoring SOSCA. Feedback Information
Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring SOSCA Feedback Information Contents Contents About SOSCA... 3 SOSCA Feedback... 3 1. Assessment Feedback... 4 2. Predictions and Chances Graph Software... 7 3. Value
More informationDiary Dates Half Term First Day Back Friday 4th April
1 Larwood Lowdown VOLUME: TWO NEWSLETTER DATE: FEBUARY 2014 ISSUE: THREE Diary Dates Half Term Monday 17th Feb - Friday 21st Feb First Day Back Monday 24th Feb pupils return at the usual time. Friday 4th
More informationÉcole Jeannine Manuel Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DN
School report École Jeannine Manuel 43 45 Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DN Inspection dates 13 15 December 2016 Overall effectiveness Effectiveness of leadership and management Quality of teaching,
More informationClassroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description
Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description Christian Ethos To work with the Headteacher and colleagues to create, inspire and embody the Christian ethos and culture of this Church Academy, securing
More informationRCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016
RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016 Acknowledgements Dr Simon Clark, Officer for Workforce Planning, RCPCH Dr Carol Ewing, Vice President Health Services, RCPCH Dr Daniel Lumsden, Former Chair,
More informationSummary: Impact Statement
Summary: Impact Statement 2015-16 The following table summarises the attainment and progress gaps over the past two years by the new national performance measures. National data is not yet available and
More informationEngineers and Engineering Brand Monitor 2015
Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor 2015 Key Findings Prepared for Engineering UK By IFF Research 7 September 2015 We gratefully acknowledge the support of Pearson in delivering this study Contact
More informationQualification handbook
Qualification handbook BIIAB Level 3 Award in 601/5960/1 Version 1 April 2015 Table of Contents 1. About the BIIAB Level 3 Award in... 1 2. About this pack... 2 3. BIIAB Customer Service... 2 4. What are
More informationTeacher of Art & Design (Maternity Cover)
Teacher of Art & Design (Maternity Cover) Closing date: Monday 27th November 2017 Application Pack Click for Website Furze Platt Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7NQ Email: office@furzeplatt.com Website:
More informationSixth Form Admissions Procedure
University of Birmingham School Sixth Form Admissions Procedure September 2018 University of Birmingham School Sixth Form Admission Procedures Review Frequency Review date Governing Committee Approved
More informationCORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI
CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI Published July 2017 by The Complementary and Natural Healthcare Council (CNHC) copyright CNHC Contents Introduction... page 3 Overall aims of the course... page 3 Learning outcomes
More informationThameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum
Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum We are a rights respecting school: Article 28: (Right to education): All children have the right to a primary education.
More informationVersion Number 3 Date of Issue 30/06/2009 Latest Revision 11/12/2015 All Staff in NAS schools, NAS IT Dept Head of Operations - Education
Schools E-Safety Policy Document Title Schools E-Safety Policy Reference Number Version Number 3 Date of Issue 30/06/2009 Latest Revision 11/12/2015 Distribution All Staff in NAS schools, NAS IT Dept Owner
More informationDIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS
DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS St. Boniface Catholic College Boniface Lane Plymouth Devon PL5 3AG URN 113558 Head Teacher: Mr Frank Ashcroft Chair of Governors:
More informationAssessment booklet Assessment without levels and new GCSE s
Assessment booklet Assessment without levels and new GCSE s Dear Parent/Carer There is much change going on in education, including a new National Curriculum, and new, more challenging GCSE s. along with
More informationChanges to GCSE and KS3 Grading Information Booklet for Parents
Changes to GCSE and KS3 Grading Information Booklet for Parents Changes to assessment in Years 10 & 11 As you are probably aware the government has made radical changes to the structure and assessment
More informationSt Matthew s RC High School
St Matthew s RC High School Teacher of Mathematics with TLR Application Pack - 1 - Appointment of Teacher of Mathematics The Governors are keen to invite applications from successful and enthusiastic qualified
More informationNATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) 2008 H. Craig Petersen Director, Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation Utah State University Logan, Utah AUGUST, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...1
More informationThe Curriculum in Primary Schools
The Curriculum in Primary Schools Seminar on findings from Curriculum Implementation Evaluation, DES Inspectorate Primary Curriculum Review, Phase 1, NCCA May 11 th 2005 Planning the curriculum whole school
More informationWoodlands Primary School. Policy for the Education of Children in Care
Woodlands Primary School Policy for the Education of Children in Care Written by Rita Tarrant-Blick Ratified by Governors Summer 2017 Date for Review Summer 2020 Signed Chair of Governors Signed Headteacher
More informationWe seek to be: A vibrant, excellent place of learning at the heart of our Christian community.
Homework Policy Our Vision (What we seek to be) We seek to be: A vibrant, excellent place of learning at the heart of our Christian community. Our Mission (What we seek to do) We are committed to providing
More informationINDEPENDENT SCHOOLS INSPECTORATE
INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS INSPECTORATE BRITISH SCHOOLS OVERSEAS INSPECTION REPORT ON NORD ANGLIA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL HONG KONG Independent Schools Inspectorate Effective from January 2011 INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS
More informationTraining Evaluation and Impact Framework 2017/19
Gloucestershire Safeguarding Children Board [Type the document subtitle] Training Evaluation and Impact Framework 2017/19 January 2017 There should be a culture of continuous learning and improvement across
More informationTAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY
TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY By Robin L. Elledge Steven L. Phillips, Ph.D. QUESTIONNAIRE & SCORING BOOKLET Name: Date: By Robin L. Elledge Steven L. Phillips, Ph.D. OVERVIEW The Team Assessment Inventory
More informationPlans for Pupil Premium Spending
Plans for Pupil Premium Spending September 2016 August 2017 Impact of Pupil Premium September 2015 August 2016 Mission Statement All Saints Multi Academy Trust, Birmingham God s Love in Action Our children
More informationAUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES
AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES AUGUST 2001 Contents Sources 2 The White Paper Learning to Succeed 3 The Learning and Skills Council Prospectus 5 Post-16 Funding
More informationCurriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.
Curriculum Policy Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls Royal Hospital School November 2017 ISI reference Key author Reviewing body Approval body Approval frequency 2a Director of Curriculum,
More informationLITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY
"Pupils should be taught in all subjects to express themselves correctly and appropriately and to read accurately and with understanding." QCA Use of Language across the Curriculum "Thomas Estley Community
More informationEducational Attainment
A Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile of Allen County, Indiana based on the 2010 Census and the American Community Survey Educational Attainment A Review of Census Data Related to the Educational Attainment
More informationSt Matthew s RC High School, Nuthurst Road, Moston, Manchester, M40 0EW
Department for Education Telephone: 0161 817 2204 Fax: 0161 372 9991 INSPECTION REPORT Email: education@dioceseofsalford.org.uk St Matthew s RC High School, Nuthurst Road, Moston, Manchester, M40 0EW Inspection
More informationSEND INFORMATION REPORT
SEND INFORMATION REPORT The application of this policy and procedure ensures that no employee receives less favourable treatment on grounds of sex, trans-gender status, sexual orientation, religion or
More informationNational Survey of Student Engagement
National Survey of Student Engagement Report to the Champlain Community Authors: Michelle Miller and Ellen Zeman, Provost s Office 12/1/2007 This report supplements the formal reports provided to Champlain
More informationAbout our academy. Joining our community
Hethersett Academy is part of the Inspiration Trust, a not-for-profit charity whose mission is to transform the lives of young people in Norfolk and Suffolk through education. Led by nationally-recognised
More informationCARDINAL NEWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL
CARDINAL NEWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL Equality Information and Objectives Updated: April 2015 Page 1 of 18 School policy statement on equality and community cohesion Our school is committed to equality both
More informationArchdiocese of Birmingham
Archdiocese of Birmingham Section 48 Inspection SS MARY AND JOHN CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL Part of the Bishop Cleary Catholic Multi-Academy Company Caledonia Rd, Wolverhampton WV2 1HZ Inspection date 19
More information29 th April Mrs Diana Dryland Headteacher Bursted Wood Primary School Swanbridge Road Bexley Heath Kent DA7 5BS
29 th April 2016 Mrs Diana Dryland Headteacher Bursted Wood Primary School Swanbridge Road Bexley Heath Kent DA7 5BS Assessment Date: 19 th & 20 th April 2016 Summary Bursted Wood Primary School is very
More informationERDINGTON ACADEMY PROSPECTUS 2016/17
ERDINGTON ACADEMY PROSPECTUS 2016/17 JOIN OUR FAMILY MR ANDY BIRD CEO OF FMAT We are delighted that you are considering an academy within the family of Fairfax Multi-Academy Trust for your child. Our aim
More informationTuesday 24th January Mr N Holmes Principal. Mr G Hughes Vice Principal (Curriculum) Mr P Galloway Vice Principal (Key Stage 3)
Y9 PATHWAYS 2017 Tuesday 24th January 2017 Mr N Holmes Principal Mr G Hughes Vice Principal (Curriculum) Mr P Galloway Vice Principal (Key Stage 3) PATHWAYS 2017 80% 71% 5+ A*-C Grades (inc English & Maths)
More informationTutor Trust Secondary
Education Endowment Foundation Tutor Trust Secondary Evaluation report and Executive summary July 2015 Independent evaluators: Emily Buchanan, Jo Morrison, Matthew Walker, Helen Aston, Rose Cook (National
More informationInitial teacher training in vocational subjects
Initial teacher training in vocational subjects This report looks at the quality of initial teacher training in vocational subjects. Based on visits to the 14 providers that undertake this training, it
More informationPaper Reference. Edexcel GCSE Mathematics (Linear) 1380 Paper 1 (Non-Calculator) Foundation Tier. Monday 6 June 2011 Afternoon Time: 1 hour 30 minutes
Centre No. Candidate No. Paper Reference 1 3 8 0 1 F Paper Reference(s) 1380/1F Edexcel GCSE Mathematics (Linear) 1380 Paper 1 (Non-Calculator) Foundation Tier Monday 6 June 2011 Afternoon Time: 1 hour
More informationUpper Wharfedale School POSITIVE ATTITUDE TO LEARNING POLICY
Upper Wharfedale School POSITIVE ATTITUDE TO LEARNING POLICY REVISED APRIL 2015 EXCELLENCE FOR ALL Upper Wharfedale School aims to promote the virtues and qualities of self-respect, tolerance, understanding,
More informationTeacher of Psychology and Health and Social Care
EGGBUCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE T H E P E R F E C T E N V I RO N M E N T Teacher of Psychology and Health and Social Care Candidate Information L E A R N I N G C A R I N G AC H I E V I N G Dear Colleague
More informationDyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital. Guidance and Information for Teachers
Dyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital Guidance and Information for Teachers Digital Tests from GL Assessment For fully comprehensive information about using digital tests from GL Assessment, please
More informationTeacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants
Teacher of English MPS/UPS Information for Applicants Start date : Easter or September 2018 Weavers Academy Striving for success, focusing on learning Dear Applicant Thank you for showing an interest in
More informationHead of Maths Application Pack
Head of Maths Application Pack Application Forms Furze Platt Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7NQ Email: office@furzeplatt.com Website: www.furzeplatt.com Tel: 01628 625308 Fax: 01628 782257 Head of Maths
More informationWisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Main takeaways from the 2015 NAEP 4 th grade reading exam: Wisconsin scores have been statistically flat
More informationStudent Experience Strategy
2020 1 Contents Student Experience Strategy Introduction 3 Approach 5 Section 1: Valuing Our Students - our ambitions 6 Section 2: Opportunities - the catalyst for transformational change 9 Section 3:
More informationJob Description for Virtual Learning Platform Assistant and Staff ICT Trainer
Job Description for Virtual Learning Platform Assistant and Staff ICT Trainer Bristol Grammar School: a company limited by guarantee, company number: 5142007 Registered Office: University Road, Bristol,
More informationPUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW
PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW 2015-2016 Pupil Premium Review 2015/2016 Ambition The school aims to provide pupils with a consistently good quality of provision for all pupils. We aim to maximise the progress of
More informationOasis Academy South Bank
School report Oasis Academy South Bank 75 Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7HS Inspection dates 24 25 June 2015 Overall effectiveness Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection:
More informationTotal amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:
Total amount of PPG expected for the year 2015-16 138,960 Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School: Aims for all pupils to make at expected progress between
More informationSASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION
SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION Report March 2017 Report compiled by Insightrix Research Inc. 1 3223 Millar Ave. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan T: 1-866-888-5640 F: 1-306-384-5655 Table of Contents
More informationPrincipal vacancies and appointments
Principal vacancies and appointments 2009 10 Sally Robertson New Zealand Council for Educational Research NEW ZEALAND COUNCIL FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH TE RŪNANGA O AOTEAROA MŌ TE RANGAHAU I TE MĀTAURANGA
More informationIEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES
You supply the passion & dedication. IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES We ll support your daily practice. Who s here? ~ Something you want to learn more about 10 Basic Steps in Special Education Child is
More informationShyness and Technology Use in High School Students. Lynne Henderson, Ph. D., Visiting Scholar, Stanford
Shyness and Technology Use in High School Students Lynne Henderson, Ph. D., Visiting Scholar, Stanford University Philip Zimbardo, Ph.D., Professor, Psychology Department Charlotte Smith, M.S., Graduate
More informationEvery curriculum policy starts from this policy and expands the detail in relation to the specific requirements of each policy s field.
1. WE BELIEVE We believe a successful Teaching and Learning Policy enables all children to be effective learners; to have the confidence to take responsibility for their own learning; understand what it
More informationCONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS
CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS No. 18 (replaces IB 2008-21) April 2012 In 2008, the State Education Department (SED) issued a guidance document to the field regarding the
More informationResearch Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008
Research Update Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008 The Equality Commission for Northern Ireland (hereafter the Commission ) in 2007 contracted the Employment Research Institute
More informationSpecial Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)
Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability) To be reviewed annually Chair of Governors, Lyn Schlich Signed January 2017 East Preston Infant School SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS [SEN] POLICY CONTENTS
More informationSEN INFORMATION REPORT
SEN INFORMATION REPORT Kinds of special educational needs Hinchingbrooke is an Academy school. We have the provision to meet the needs of students with moderate learning difficulties, dyslexia and dyspraxia,
More informationSELF-ASSESSMENT EXTREMISM & RADICALISATION SELF-ASSESSMENT AND RISK ASSESSMENT
SELF-ASSESSENT 1. Clear leadership and accountable structures are in place an visible throughout the organisation There is an identified strategic PREVENT lead within each school The strategic lead understands
More informationEast Riding of Yorkshire SACRE Report 2012/13
East Riding of Yorkshire SACRE Report 2012/13 Introduction from Chair It is my pleasure to present the annual report of the East Riding SACRE. This report summarises my first year as Chair and I would
More informationAPPLICANT S INFORMATION PACK
APPLICANT S INFORMATION PACK C O N T E N T S 1. Letter from the Headteacher 2. Application and Selection process and timescales 3. Whalley Range 11-18 High School Profile 4. The Education and Leadership
More informationSchool Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning
School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning An Analysis of Relationships between School Size and Assessments of Factors Related to the Quality of Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools Undertaken
More informationPROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION
PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION Paston Sixth Form College and City College Norwich Vision for the future of outstanding Post-16 Education in North East Norfolk Date of Issue: 22 September
More informationABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs
ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs Mapped to 2008 NSSE Survey Questions First Edition, June 2008 Introduction and Rationale for Using NSSE in ABET Accreditation One of the most common
More informationSpecial Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy
Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy Policy Date: March 2017 Renewal Date: March 2018 Owner: Daniela Pinger, SENCO Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy 1. Ethos and
More informationPolitics and Society Curriculum Specification
Leaving Certificate Politics and Society Curriculum Specification Ordinary and Higher Level 1 September 2015 2 Contents Senior cycle 5 The experience of senior cycle 6 Politics and Society 9 Introduction
More informationOffice of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION
Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION We seek to become recognized for providing bright and curious
More informationINDEPENDENT SCHOOLS INSPECTORATE
INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS INSPECTORATE BRITISH SCHOOLS OVERSEAS INSPECTION REPORT ON THE BRITISH SCHOOL IN THE NETHERLANDS INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS INSPECTORATE The British School in The Netherlands Full Name of
More informationVTCT Level 3 Award in Education and Training
VTCT Level 3 Award in Education and Training Operational start date: 1st April 2014 Credit value: 12 Total Qualification Time (TQT): 120 Guided learning hours (GLH): 48 Qualification number: 601/2758/2
More informationMeriam Library LibQUAL+ Executive Summary
Meriam Library LibQUAL+ Executive Summary Meriam Library LibQUAL+ Executive Summary Page 2 ABOUT THE SURVEY LibQUAL+ is a survey designed to measure users perceptions and expectations of library service
More informationNational Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report
The College Student Report This is a facsimile of the NSSE survey (available at nsse.iub.edu/links/surveys). The survey itself is administered online. 1. During the current school year, about how often
More informationAssessing and Providing Evidence of Generic Skills 4 May 2016
Assessing and Providing Evidence of Generic Skills 4 May 2016 Dr. Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan Head of Professional Development/ Associate Professor Centre for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) Tell
More informationAalya School. Parent Survey Results
Aalya School Parent Survey Results 2016-2017 Parent Survey Results Academic Year 2016/2017 September 2017 Research Office The Research Office conducts surveys to gather qualitative and quantitative data
More informationA non-profit educational institution dedicated to making the world a better place to live
NAPOLEON HILL FOUNDATION A non-profit educational institution dedicated to making the world a better place to live YOUR SUCCESS PROFILE QUESTIONNAIRE You must answer these 75 questions honestly if you
More informationAbu Dhabi Indian. Parent Survey Results
Abu Dhabi Indian Parent Survey Results 2016-2017 Parent Survey Results Academic Year 2016/2017 September 2017 Research Office The Research Office conducts surveys to gather qualitative and quantitative
More information2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.
National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at St. Cloud State University Preliminary Report (December, ) Institutional Studies and Planning National Survey of Student Engagement
More informationUnit 2. A whole-school approach to numeracy across the curriculum
Unit 2 A whole-school approach to numeracy across the curriculum 50 Numeracy across the curriculum Unit 2 Crown copyright 2001 Unit 2 A whole-school approach to numeracy across the curriculum Objectives
More informationDISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES
SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 20 (KOOTENAY-COLUMBIA) DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES The purpose of the District Assessment, Evaluation & Reporting Guidelines and Procedures
More informationInterpreting ACER Test Results
Interpreting ACER Test Results This document briefly explains the different reports provided by the online ACER Progressive Achievement Tests (PAT). More detailed information can be found in the relevant
More informationCurriculum Guide. Year 9 Spring Term. We follow the new national curriculum guidelines for KS3 art and design and we aim to ensure that all pupils:
Curriculum Guide Year 9 Spring Term ART & DESIGN The practical focus in Art & Design during year 9 will be on continuing to develop drawing skills and extend the range of materials and techniques used
More informationAbu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada
Abu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada Parent Survey Results 2016-2017 Parent Survey Results Academic Year 2016/2017 September 2017 Research Office The Research Office conducts surveys to gather qualitative
More informationInternational Advanced level examinations
International Advanced level examinations Entry, Aggregation and Certification Procedures and Rules Effective from 2014 onwards Document running section Contents Introduction 3 1. Making entries 4 2. Receiving
More informationPost-intervention multi-informant survey on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) on disability and inclusive education
Leonard Cheshire Disability and Inclusive Development Centre University College London Promoting the provision of inclusive primary education for children with disabilities in Mashonaland, West Province,
More informationlearning collegiate assessment]
[ collegiate learning assessment] INSTITUTIONAL REPORT 2005 2006 Kalamazoo College council for aid to education 215 lexington avenue floor 21 new york new york 10016-6023 p 212.217.0700 f 212.661.9766
More information