Follow this and additional works at:
|
|
- Clementine Chapman
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The University of Toledo The University of Toledo Digital Repository Theses and Dissertations 2013 The effects of two schedules of instruction with constant time delay on the receptive word learning skills of preschool children with developmental delays Margie A. Spino The University of Toledo Follow this and additional works at: Recommended Citation Spino, Margie A., "The effects of two schedules of instruction with constant time delay on the receptive word learning skills of preschool children with developmental delays" (2013). Theses and Dissertations This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The University of Toledo Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The University of Toledo Digital Repository. For more information, please see the repository's About page.
2 A Dissertation entitled The Effects of Two Schedules of Instruction with Constant Time Delay on the Receptive Word Learning Skills of Preschool Children with Developmental Delays by Margie A. Spino Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in in Curriculum and Instruction: Special Education Dr. William F. McInerney, Committee Chair Dr. Laurie A. Dinnebeil, Committee Member Dr. Edward J. Cancio, Committee Member Dr. Mark Wolery, Committee Member Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May, 2013
3 Copyright 2013, Margie A. Spino This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author.
4 An Abstract of The Effects of Two Schedules of Instruction with Constant Time Delay on the Receptive Word Learning Skills of Preschool Children with Developmental Delays by Margie A. Spino Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Curriculum and Instruction: Special Education The University of Toledo May, 2013 Young children with special needs in inclusive settings may be provided special education services by itinerant early childhood special education (ECSE) teachers. These teachers typically travel to the community-based preschool program and work with a child for about 1 hour, 1 day each week. Research suggests that once itinerant ECSE teachers leave the classroom, children with disabilities are rarely provided specialized instruction. Additionally, the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC), the primary ESCE professional organization in the U.S., recommends that instruction be embedded within everyday routines and that it be distributed across the day and throughout the week. Despite these recommendations, the practice of providing specialized services directly to a child, during one visit per week, continues. This study examined if a once-a-week instructional schedule as used by ECSE teachers providing direct services was sufficient to promote learning in young children with disabilities, especially those with cognitive disabilities. The extent to which instruction should be distributed in order to promote learning in young children with disabilities was addressed by comparing two different intervention intensities (i.e., iii
5 schedules) with the constant time delay strategy. Four preschool children with identified disabilities participated along with their 3 preschool teachers. The ECSE teachers taught children to identify items by pointing to them using the constant time delay strategy with a 1x/week schedule and a 3x/week schedule. An adapted alternating treatments design was used to evaluate the effects of the two schedules. The results indicated that both the 1x/week and 3x/week schedules were effective to teach two of the four children both target words and to teach one child one target word. Examination of the three teachers procedural fidelity data revealed that three s with specific corrective feedback were sufficient to yield PF scores of 100%. While teachers were nearly perfect in their implementation of the CTD procedures, they were less successful in implementing the procedure with the intended dose frequency. iv
6 Acknowledgements When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world. -- John Muir My parents instilled in me a love of learning and a sense of wonder about the world. I am thankful to them for those gifts and for their unwavering love and support. Thank you to my sisters and their families who always encouraged and believed in me and to my in-laws whose warm care has comforted me. In particular I wish to thank my husband and step-daughter, Rod and Kelsey, for always listening, for taking care of me, for never complaining, for being patient. I remember the day that Dr. William McInerney, my committee chair, suggested that I pursue a doctorate degree. I am eternally grateful not only for that initial suggestion but for all the guidance and support he provided. I thank my other committee members, Dr. Laurie Dinnebeil, Dr. Edward Cancio, and Dr. Mark Wolery, for giving so freely of their time. Their advice and feedback kept me on course. In addition, I am thankful for the friendship and support of Dr. Lyn Hale and Dr. Laurence Coleman as well as the contributions of Gwen Weber and Christina Yeager for coding and Dr. Andrea Glesser for assisting with the child assessment. I am also deeply appreciative of the mentorship of Dr. Vladimir Sloutsky during my time at The Ohio State University. I thank the administrators of the Monroe County Intermediate School District and the families of the children for allowing me to work with them. Finally, I can never thank enough the three teachers who gave so generously of their time and efforts, Elyse Bryant, Renee Retli, and Michele Springsteen. I am truly indebted to them for their commitment and attention to detail. v
7 Table of Contents Abstract Acknowledgements Table of Contents List of Tables List of Figures iii v vi x xii I. Introduction 1 A. Itinerant Service Delivery 2 B. Evidence-based Practices 5 C. Treatment Fidelity 6 D. Intervention Intensity 7 E. Summary 9 F. Objectives of the Study 11 II. Literature Review 13 A. The Spacing Effect 13 a. General characteristics of the spacing effect 13 b. Research with adult participants 15 c. Research with child participants 16 d. Research with children with disabilities 20 e. Every-day versus every-other-day instruction 24 f. Summary 25 B. Differential Treatment Intensity 27 a. Definition and components 27 vi
8 b. Recommendations to researchers 30 C. Constant Time Delay 31 a. Effectiveness and fidelity 34 b. Treatment intensity and research reviews 36 c. Treatment intensity and early childhood studies 37 d. Summary 45 III. Methodology 47 A. Participants 47 a. Teacher participants 47 b. Child participants 48 c. Child assessment 51 B. Setting 54 C. Materials 54 D. Target Stimuli 56 E. Response Definitions and Measurement Procedures 57 F. Experimental Design 60 G. Threats to Internal Validity 61 H. Procedures 65 a. Teaching training 65 b. Screening 66 c. Initial probe 67 d. Wait training 68 e. Comparison 71 vii
9 f. Final probe 76 g. Generalization 76 h. Maintenance 77 I. Social Validity 77 J. Interobserver Agreement and Procedural Fidelity 77 K. Data Analysis Procedures 79 L. Determination of a Functional Relationship 84 IV. Results 86 A. Visual Analysis 86 a. Brenda 86 b. Cara 89 c. Fiona 92 d. Jacob 94 e. Median level change 98 f. Percentage non-overlapping data 98 B. Descriptive Statistics 99 a. Effectiveness 99 b. Efficiency 100 c. Generalization 101 d. Maintenance 102 e. Fidelity of procedure and intensity 103 C. Social Validity 107 V. Discussion 112 viii
10 A. General Findings 112 B. Limitations 118 C. Implications for Practice and Future Research 120 References 125 Appendices A. Reinforcer Survey 138 B. Lesson Plans for Teacher Training 139 C. Data Collection Forms for Each Condition 144 D. IOA and PF Data Collection Forms 149 E. Social Validity Survey 156 ix
11 List of Tables Table 1 Definitions and examples of treatment intensity components Table 2 Example of treatment intensity components for a low-frequency and highfrequency intervention Table 3 Example of treatment intensity components for a study holding cumulative intervention intensity constant Table 4 Treatment intensity components of early childhood special education studies using CTD Table 5 Estimates of number of trials each week of ECSE studies using CTD Table 6 Learning criterions for the ECSE studies using CTD Table 7 DAS-II subtests administered and abilities measured Table 8 Descriptive classification labels for composite and subtest scores for the DAS-II Table 9 Child participant composite and subtest scores on the DAS-II Table 10 Target items used with each child Table 11 Research questions and measures for the study Table 12 Sequence of experimental sessions and number of trials Table 13 Procedure for wait training Table 14 Sample schedule for comparison condition Table 15 Procedure for 0-second delay trials in the comparison condition Table 16 Procedure of 3-second delay trials in the comparison condition Table 17 Percentage of IOA for each child participant by condition Table 18 Percentage of PF for planned teacher behaviors for probe sessions x
12 Table 19 Percentage of PF for planned teacher behaviors for 1x/week sessions Table 20 Percentage of PF for planned teacher behaviors for 3x/week sessions Table 21 Median level change between initial probe and comparison conditions by child and schedule Table 22 PND between initial probe and comparison conditions by child and schedule Table 23 Average correct on probes for each child by schedule Table 24 Efficiency data for each child who met criterion Table 25 Average PF for teachers before and after last day of corrective feedback Table 26 Percent of 1x/week periods that correct dose frequency (12 trials/week was provided Table 27 Percent of 3x/week periods that correct dose frequency (1 session/day, 3 days/week, 12 trials/week) was provided Table 28 Average number of trials/week for each child by schedule Table 29 Percentage of four teachers responses on the Social Validity Survey to the overall use of the CTD strategy before and after the study Table 30 Percentage of four teachers responses on the Social Validity Survey to the use of the CTD strategy with a 1x/week and 3x/week schedule Table 31 Actual and intended dose frequency for each schedule Table 32 Treatment intensity components of ECSE studies that used CTD, including the current study xi
13 List of Figures Figure 1 Subtests comprising the Special Nonverbal Composite of the DAS-II Figure 2 Percentage of unprompted correct responses for Brenda during initial probe, comparison, final probe, generalization, and maintenance conditions Figure 3 Percentage of unprompted correct responses for Cara during initial probe, comparison, final probe, generalization, and maintenance conditions Figure 4 Percentage of unprompted correct responses for Fiona during initial probe, comparison, final probe, generalization, and maintenance conditions Figure 5 Percentage of unprompted correct responses for Jacob during initial probe, comparison, final probe, generalization, and maintenance conditions Figure 6 Change in final probe to maintenance probe scores for each child by schedule xii
14 Chapter One Introduction Before the passage of landmark federal legislation (Education of All Handicapped Children Act, 1975) many young children with disabilities were not eligible for special services. Those children who received services were usually taught in separate classrooms and were segregated from their peers without disabilities (DeMonte, 2010). While parents and professionals were initially happy that these young children were finally receiving educational services, they recognized that the separate settings limited children s abilities to learn and to become accepted as members of the community. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s parent and professional groups fought for equal access to education for children with disabilities. Persistent pressure in the public arena and in the courts ultimately resulted in changes to federal and state policies. While Congress in 1975 mandated that all children with disabilities had the right to a free and appropriate public education (P.L ), it was not until 1986 that Congress amended the earlier act and extended the same protections to preschoolers (3-5 years of age) while laying the foundation for early intervention with young children birth to 3 years of age (P.L ). However, states were not required to make the necessary changes to serve young children with disabilities until the school year (DeMonte, 2010). Since the passage of P.L , an increasing number of young children with special needs receive special education services in inclusive settings with typical peers; both the number of young children receiving services and the percentage of children receiving services in early childhood settings has increased. In 1995 IDEA annual data indicated there were 548,588 young children from 3-5 years of age receiving services 1
15 (U.S. Department of Education, 2010). By 2009 that number had increased by 33% to 731,250 young children (U.S. Department of Education, 2009). With regard to more inclusive settings, in 2006 approximately 44% of the 692,017 young children with disabilities receiving services were educated in regular early childhood programs for more than 80% of their weekly instructional time (U.S. Department of Education, 2006). Within three years almost 50% of the 731,250 preschool-age children with disabilities were in regular early childhood programs for more than 80% of the time (U.S. Department of Education, 2009). As young children with special needs move from separate special education preschool classrooms to more inclusive settings, there is a need for special education teachers to also move out of their classrooms in order to visit these young children and provide services. Itinerant Service Delivery An itinerant model of early childhood service delivery is one that is used to support the inclusion of children with disabilities within the least restrictive environment often within community-based programs (Dinnebeil, Pretti-Frontczak, & McInerney, 2009, p. 436). Itinerant early childhood special education (ECSE) teachers travel to communitybased early childhood classrooms to provide specialized services to eligible children (Dinnebeil & McInerney, 2000; Dinnebeil et al., 2009). In Ohio, for example, a typical pattern of service delivery involves the itinerant early childhood special education teacher visiting inclusive settings once a week for about one hour (Dinnebeil, McInerney, Roth, & Ramaswamy, 2001). The term, itinerant, only denotes the location of the special education service but not the nature of those services (Dinnebeil, McInerney, & Hale, 2
16 2006b; Dinnebeil et al., 2009). So while it is understood that an itinerant ECSE teacher will provide services in a setting other than a self-contained special education classroom, (e.g., Head Start classroom, childcare center, child s home), the term itself does not automatically specify how the services will be provided. With respect to itinerant services, Odom and his colleagues (1999) specified two major types of itinerant services: direct and consultative. With the direct services approach the itinerant ECSE teacher periodically visits the classroom to provide specialized services directly to the child with special needs. Markowitz and colleagues (2006) indicated, however, that once the itinerant ECSE teacher left the classroom, the early childhood teacher rarely provided instruction that addressed the special needs of the child with disabilities. If this once-a-week instruction is the only instruction children receive related to the skills and knowledge targeted in their IEP, then too much forgetting may occur between teaching sessions. The Division for Early Childhood (DEC), recommends that instruction be embedded within everyday routines and that it be distributed across the day and throughout the week (Wolery, 2005). Despite these recommendations, the practice of providing specialized services directly to the child, during one visit per week, continues in some school districts. Another model for providing services is the consultative approach (Odom et al., 1999) in which the itinerant ECSE teacher primarily spends her weekly visit working with and coaching her early childhood teacher partner. Although the itinerant teacher in this model may interact with and work with children, her or his primary responsibility is to help the child s primary teacher or caregiver find ways to provide IEP-based instruction in her absence (Dinnebeil et al., 2006b, p. 153). In the consultative approach, 3
17 the early childhood teacher learns to address the child s specialized needs, as identified in the Individualized Education Plan (IEP), and embeds and distributes instruction multiple times a week. Buysse and Wesley (2005) contended that a primary reason for adopting the consultative approach is that itinerant ECSE teachers could assist more students more efficiently than through the direct services delivery model. The consultative approach holds the promise of producing positive change, not only in the client (e.g., the child) but also in the consultee (e.g., the teacher), the program (e.g., the curriculum or learning environment), and potentially, the entire system (Buysse & Wesley, 2005, p. 5). The field of early childhood special education regards models of indirect service delivery (i.e., the consultative approach) as best practice for inclusive education (Horn & Sandall, 2000; Lieber et al., 1997; McWilliam, Wolery, & Odom, 2001). While the consultative approach is the preferred model of instruction recommended by leaders in the field of early childhood special education, it does not appear to be the preferred model for itinerant ECSE teachers. Survey and observational studies found that the overwhelming majority of itinerant ECSE teachers self-reported or were observed providing direct services to children rather than consulting with ECE teachers (Dinnebeil, et al., 2001; Dinnebeil, McInerney, & Hale, 2004; Dinnebeil, McInerney, & Hale, 2006a). Using a direct services approach would be warranted if research found it to be more effective or efficient at facilitating learning. However, to date, there have not been any studies conducted that have directly compared the effect of direct services versus the consultative approach on a child s attainment of priority IEP objectives. 4
18 Evidence-based Practices There is ample evidence to suggest a growing gap between what we know we should do and what we are doing in early childhood intervention (Bruder, 2010, p. 345). Within the field of education there has been a recent emphasis on adopting evidence-based practices. In 2001, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act required schools to utilize scientifically-based research practices for the classroom, while in 2004, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) required that special education instruction be based on peer-reviewed research. IDEA identified an insufficient focus on applying replicable research on proven methods of teaching and learning for students with disabilities (IDEA, Section 14(c)(4)) as a major barrier to improving outcomes for children with disabilities. Additionally, the mission for the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) is to promote policies and advance evidence-based practices that support families and enhance the optimal development of young children who have or are at risk for developmental delays and disabilities (from As such DEC has based its recommended practices for the field on two key sources of information. The first source is scientific research on effective practices. The second is the knowledge and experience of individuals who work with young children and partner with their families. Odom and Wolery (2003) echoed this view when they stated that the emphasis on grounding practice in supportive evidence is a critical direction in EI/ECSE (p. 170). Despite these federal mandates and calls for the use of evidence-based practices, teachers are not necessarily utilizing such practices in their classrooms. The dearth of 5
19 research-supported methods being consistently applied to support learning is recognized within special education as a whole (Carnine, 1997; Greenwood, 2001; Kauffman, 1996) and within early childhood special education (Bruder, 2010; McLean, Snyder, Smith, & Sandall, 2002; Odom, 2009) as the research-to-practice gap. Reasons often cited for the gap include inaccessible research findings, contradictory research findings, and complex implementation procedures (Carnine, 1997; Gersten, Morvant, & Brengelman, 1995; Greenwood & Abbott, 2001; Jones, 2009). Researchers found that implementing evidence-based practices in special education classrooms were often challenging and difficult (Abbott, Walton, Tapia, & Greenwood, 1999; Ayres, Meyer, Erevelles, & Park- Lee, 1994; Gersten, et al. 1995). Teachers who are not adequately trained or who find the implementation process too complex may use the strategy with low levels of fidelity or may abandon the strategy altogether (Fitzpatrick & Knowlton, 2009). Treatment Fidelity Treatment integrity (sometimes called treatment fidelity or procedural reliability) refers to the degree to which a treatment is implemented as planned or intended. [It] is concerned with the accuracy and consistency with which independent variables constituting the treatment (as opposed to subject characteristics) are implemented. (Gresham, MacMillan, Beebe-Frankenberger, & Bocian, 2000, p. 198) There are many strategies available to ECSE teachers that are based on research such as those recommended by DEC as child-focused practices (e.g., differential reinforcement, correspondence training, high-probability procedures) (Sandall, Hemmeter, Smith, & McLean, 2005). However, besides choosing an evidence-based 6
20 strategy, implementing the strategy with fidelity is equally important. [I]n order to realize the promise offered by research on intervention and instructional efficacy, teachers must implement practices in their classroom in a way similar to that intended by the purveyors (Odom, 2009, p. 54). Fidelity is facilitated when intervention practices are simple and straightforward and, therefore, easier to learn for early childhood practitioners and parents. In a review of implementation fidelity research, Carroll et al. (2007) found that simple but specific interventions are more likely to be implemented with high fidelity than overly complex or vague ones (p. 5). The degree to which an intervention is implemented accurately and consistently has been found to affect student outcomes (Benner, Beaudoin, Chen, Davis, Ralston, 2010; Holcombe, Wolery, & Snyder, 1994; Mihalic, S., 2004; Stein et al., 2008) with higher levels of fidelity associated with more positive outcomes. Interventions and strategies that are considered evidence-based are not only efficacious but also efficient. Efficacy, or effectiveness, considers whether a student learned, while efficiency considers if one intervention allowed more rapid learning or allowed more content or skills to be learned in the same amount of time. The efficacy of an EBP assumes implementation in the manner and level of intensity used in the efficacy studies (Odom, Collet-Klingenberg, Rogers, & Hattan, 2010, p. 279). As such, the level of intensity or schedule used to implement the strategy may be an important variable that might impact effectiveness and efficiency (Venn, Wolery, & Greco, 1996; Warren, Fey, & Yoder, 2007). Intervention Intensity 7
21 [H]igh doses of teaching episodes per se may not necessarily be the most effective approach. More learning may result by increasing the dose frequency (i.e., number of sessions per week) while applying lower doses across longer durations for some types of goals, with some types of children, and with some dose forms. (Warren et al., 2007, p. 71) Intervention intensity (or treatment intensity) has usually been defined as the duration of a treatment (e.g., Casto & Mastropieri, 1986; Innocenti & White, 1993), such as the number of hours per week. While Warren et al. (2007) acknowledged that defining intensity in this way allows the concept to be more easily understood by practitioners, parents, and policy makers, this simple definition fails to capture the full complexity of the construct. For example, researchers might report that an intervention was implemented for 3 sessions a week but might not report the number of trials or teaching opportunities within each session. An intervention that utilized 8 trials per session for a total of 24 trials per week might result in vastly different outcomes than an intervention that only used 1 trial per session for a total of 3 trials per week. To provide consistency across research studies and aid in the development of optimally efficacious interventions, Warren et al. (2007) proposed that intervention intensity be more precisely defined as five separate terms: dose, dose form, dose frequency, total intervention duration, and cumulative intervention intensity. Of particular interest to this study are dose, dose frequency, and total intervention duration. Dose is the number of properly administrated teaching episodes during a single intervention session (Warren et al., 2007, p. 71), and dose frequency is the number of times a dose of intervention is provided per day and per week (p. 72). The total intervention duration 8
22 is the period of time that an intervention is provided. For example, a play-based intervention may involve 60 teaching sessions per hour (dose) for 1 session each day for 5 days a week (dose frequency) to be provided for 40 weeks (total intervention duration). Over 30 years ago, Meyen and Lehr (as cited in Faggella-Luby & Deshler, 2008) identified intensity as a necessary factor to consider when designing effective instruction for students with disabilities. They challenged educational researchers to measure and study intensity of instruction. Warren et al. (2007) identified four types of knowledge that could result from the study of different levels of intensity: 1. A treatment that is effective at a given level of intensity may be more or less effective at a different level of intensity. 2. Changing any one of the aspects of intensity may produce different effects on children with different developmental profiles. 3. Some intensity levels may produce side effects such as stress and challenging behaviors. 4. Cumulative intervention intensity plays an important role and when comparing different interventions, it should be controlled. In fact, Warren et al., (2007) recommended that Researchers should commence the systematic study of differential treatment intensities for interventions that have shown promising effects at given intensity levels. Many intervention techniques and approaches have been reported in the literature. We know virtually nothing about their effectiveness at different doses, dose frequencies, and cumulative intensities. (p. 76) Summary 9
23 With increasing numbers of young children with disabilities participating in inclusive settings, ECSE teachers must travel to community-based early childhood classrooms to provide specialized services to these eligible children. Two approaches to providing itinerant services have been identified. The direct services approach is often used by itinerant ECSE teachers even though the consultative approach is recommended by leaders in the field. With the direct services approach, young children in inclusive settings usually receive specialized instruction one day each week. After the itinerant ECSE teacher leaves the setting, the general early childhood education teacher rarely continues to provide specialized instruction to the child with disabilities. This study examined if this once-a-week schedule was sufficient to promote learning in young children with disabilities, especially those children with cognitive disabilities. Chapter 2 examines the issue of once-a-week instruction by reviewing research on distributing instruction (i.e., the spacing effect). Both federal mandates and professional organizations have required the use of evidence-based practices (EBP) within special education to improve outcomes for children with disabilities. But just using an EBP is insufficient; it is also necessary to implement the practice with fidelity. This means that practitioners need to utilize the correct procedures described for the practice as well as the appropriate intervention intensity. Not using the same procedure and intensity that were used when the practice was determined to be effective may result in less than optimal outcomes for children. Chapter 2 examines one EBP (the practice of constant time delay) and the intervention intensities used in previous studies of the effectiveness of this strategy. This study compared two different intervention intensities of the constant time delay strategy. 10
24 Objectives of the Study There are two main objectives of the study. The first was to compare two different intervention intensities of an evidence-based strategy during a receptive word-learning task. The subjects of this study were preschool children who were receiving special education services under an IEP. Two different intervention schedules were used, with each schedule employing different doses and dose frequencies. One of the schedules provided 12 teaching episodes during a single session (dose), with 1 session occurring one day each week (dose frequency). The second schedule provided 4 teaching episodes during a single session (dose), with 1 session occurring each day and 3 sessions occurring each week (dose frequency). In general, the study sought to examine the effectiveness and efficiency of using an evidence-based strategy at two different intervention intensities. The second objective was to determine the types of supports needed by early childhood special education teachers (ECSE) in order to reliably implement the intervention strategy. Before beginning the experimental conditions, the ECSE teachers received the same training in the use of a specific evidence-based teaching strategy (constant time delay). Specifically, the following research questions were addressed: 1. Will young children who were identified with special needs target acquire target behaviors using both instructional schedules (once a week and 3 times a week)? (effectiveness) 2. Will a once-a-week instructional schedule or a 3 times a week instructional schedule result in more rapid acquisition of target behaviors? (efficiency) 11
25 3. Will these young children generalize the target behaviors across 2 different teachers? In the generalization condition, will there be more correct responses from children who learned with the 1x/week or children who learned in the 3x/week schedule? 4. Will these young children maintain the target behaviors 2 weeks after the generalization probe? In the maintenance condition, will there be more correct responses from children who learned with the 1x/week schedule or children who learned in the 3x/week schedule? 5. What types of supports will preschool teachers need in order to implement the intervention strategies reliably? 12
26 Chapter Two Literature Review The Spacing Effect This study examined the effectiveness and efficiency of two different intervention intensities for the CTD strategy. In other words, the study addressed the question of how distributed instruction should be in order to facilitate the learning of young children with disabilities. If instruction were more widely distributed and occurred once a week, was too much forgotten? Additionally, did young children with developmental delays learn when instruction was distributed over three days? The study of distributing instruction and examining its effects on learning was first documented by Ebbinghuas in 1885 (Cepeda et al., 2009). Since that time researchers have consistently found that performance improves if practice sessions are distributed (or spaced) rather than massed. This influence of distributed practice is called the spacing effect, and it is considered one of the best known and most robust phenomena in experimental psychology (Bahrick & Hall, 2005; Dempster & Farris, 1990; Rea & Modigliani, 1985). Researchers continue to explore and refine the spacing effect. Questions remain about this effect, such as what is the optimal amount of spacing for learning certain tasks, what amount of spacing optimizes retention, and do these effects hold for children? What follows is an explanation of general characteristics of the spacing effect along with studies conducted with participants who were adults, children developing typically, and children with disabilities. General characteristics of the spacing effect. A typical spacing effect study involves massed and distributed practice sessions. In each practice session, whether 13
27 massed or distributed, an individual studies the same material. What changes is the schedule of instruction, i.e., how often and when the person practices. An example of massed practice would be if a child repeatedly practiced a skill once a day for 30 minutes. Conversely, with distributed practice, the child might practice the same skill three times a day for ten minutes each time (for a total of 30 minutes). For empirical purposes, what is important is that in each case the child studies the same amount of time (e.g., 30 minutes) or the same amount of material (e.g., 10 words). In these examples, the practice sessions are massed or distributed within one day; however, practices could also occur over multiple days. For example, a child might practice a skill one time a day for four days. Therefore, practice sessions or instruction could be massed within a single day, distributed within a single day, or distributed across days. Within empirical investigations of the spacing effect, two important concepts have been considered: interstudy interval and retention interval. The interstudy interval (ISI) is the amount of time (i.e., interval) separating different study or teaching episodes. For example, if a child practices a skill three times a day with two hours between each session, then the ISI is 2 hours. If a child practices a skill once a day for 30 minutes, then the ISI is zero since there is only one practice session. If a child practices one day a week for 4 weeks, then the ISI is 7 days (1 week). The retention interval (RI) is the amount of time (i.e., interval) between the last instructional/study time and the test. For example, a teacher may practice vocabulary words with a student and then immediately test the student on those words. In this case the retention interval (RI) would be zero. If the teacher waited three hours after the 14
28 review to test the student, the RI would be 3 hours. And if the test were given two weeks after the review (with no other practice by the student), then the RI would be 14 days. Research with adult participants. In two research reviews of the spacing effect (Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wisted, & Rohrer, 2006; Donovan & Radosevich, 1999) over 300 experiments involving mostly adults were analyzed. Overall both reviews concluded that spaced practice results in more learning and is, therefore, superior to massed practice. Two other findings are relevant. The first is that too much spacing may not be beneficial. Donovan and Radosevich (1999) found that in some cases, longer ISIs actually negated the beneficial effects of distributed practice. In other words, if too much time elapsed between practice sessions, the individual did not learn as much in the spaced condition as they learned in the massed condition. Cepeda et al. (2006) also noted this effect and discussed it as a relationship between the ISI and the RI. They found that both the ISI and RI contributed to the spacing effect. For a given RI, as the ISI increased, more information was retained; however, if the ISI was increased too much, then retention declined. The second relevant finding is that distributing across days rather than simply within a single day benefits learning. Cepeda et al. (2006) concluded this after examining the effects of ISI alone as well as the joint effects of ISI and RI on level of retention. In the studies they reviewed, there were ISIs that ranged from 1 second to more than 100 days, and RIs that ranged from 1 second to 5 years. While the overall results of their analysis found that distributing practice is more beneficial to learning than massing practice (average benefit of 15%), they also stated that 15
29 Distributing learning across different days (instead of grouping learning episodes within a single day) greatly improves the amount of material retained for sizable periods of time; the literature clearly suggests that distributing practice in this way is likely to markedly improve students retention of course material. (Cepeda et al., 2006, p. 371) Cepeda et al. (2006) noted educational implications for their findings. The goal of education is to have students remember information for extended periods of time such as months and even years. Their review indicated that long-term retention can be maximized by separating learning sessions by at least one day rather than massing all learning into one session. Additionally, more information was retained after one month if learning sessions were spaced across weeks or months instead of across one day. Despite these promising findings, they cautioned that it was too early to extend the primarily adult data to situations with children. About 88% of the data in their analysis were based on adults (18 years of age or older), while preschoolers made up 29 assessments of distributed practice or only about 3% of the data. Even though most of the studies with children did show a benefit for distributing practice, the retention intervals were only about one day. Until empirical data examining the distributed practice effect in children are collected, using retention intervals of months or years and ISIs of days or months (no usable data meeting these criteria currently exist, to our knowledge), we cannot say for certain that children s long-term memory will benefit from distributed practice. (371) Research with child participants. Most of the studies examining the spacing effect utilized adult participants and experimental tasks conducted in laboratory settings. 16
30 However, there have been studies conducted with young children that employed more typical learning tasks. The first set of studies examined distributing practice within a day, and the next set of studies analyzed the effects of distributing practice across multiple days. Distributed within a day. Rea and Modigliani (1987) examined the spacing effect with 96 children from four age groups (preschool, kindergarten, first grade, and third grade). Children were asked to recall nouns and pictures after learning occurred in massed and distributed practice conditions. In the massed condition items were presented successively with no distracter items presented in between items (ISI=0). In the distributed condition, items were presented with one (ISI=1) or three (ISI=3) intervening items. A test to see how many items could be recalled was given immediately after the last item was presented (RI=seconds). Rea and Modigliani found that while older children recalled more than younger children, all age groups experienced a benefit of spacing. Further, the number of items recalled increased as the spacing increased. As the ISI increased from 0, to 1, to 3 items, the number of items recalled increased from 0.79, to 1.08, to A study that used a more typical task and setting was conducted by Seabrook, Brown and Solity (2005). Their study involved teaching reading through phonics instruction to 34 young children with an average age of 5 years. Instruction occurred in regular classrooms over a two-week period with massed practice occurring in 6-minute sessions each day and distributed practice occurring in three two-minute sessions each day. A pre-test was administered before the instruction began, and a final test was given one day after the instruction was concluded (RI=1 day). Results indicated that distributed 17
31 practice resulted in greater learning than massed practice. The average improvement score for massed practice was 1.3, while for distributed practice it was 8.3. After two weeks, the children in the distributed condition had test scores that were six times greater than their counterparts in the massed condition. Distributed across days. Childers and Tomasello (2002) taught 36 two-and-onehalf year olds novel words over the course of one month during sessions that lasted five to ten minutes. There were multiple conditions with ISIs that ranged from 0 days (massed) to 3 days (distributed). Three tests were given. One test was given immediately after training was completed, the second occurred one day after training, and the third was given one week after training. The results indicated an effect for ISI but not for RI; if the child learned the novel word they remembered it the next day and the next week. Other results indicated that children learned the words best when practice was distributed over four days regardless of the number of intervening days. The worst learning occurred in the two massed conditions when all presentations were done in a single day. Ambridge, Theakston, Lieven, and Tomasello (2006) required 48 young children, aged 3.5 to almost 6 years old, to construct complex grammatical sentences. For example, after observing puppets perform some actions, the child would state, It was the cup that the frog took. This task differed from the others examined so far in that this was a higher level mental task. The child was not simply recalling or recognizing information but had to use the observed information to construct a unique sentence. Three learning conditions were used: (1) a massed condition where 10 training trials were presented one after the other on a single day; (2) a distributed-pairs condition where 10 training trials were presented with 2 trials per day for 5 consecutive days, and (3) a distributed condition 18
32 where 10 training trials were presented with 1 trial per day for 10 days. A final test was given immediately after the last trial (RI=seconds). Even with this complex task, children performed better in the distributed and distributed-pairs conditions than in the massed. Rovee-Collier, Evancio, and Early (1995) described a set of two experiments. In both experiments infants of approximately 90 days old were taught in two 15-minute sessions to kick to activate on overhead crib mobile. In the first experiment there were four conditions that depended on when the second training session was conducted either 1, 2, 3, or 4 days after the initial training session. A long-term retention test was conducted about 7 days after the initial training session (RI=3, 4, 5 or 6 days). They found significant retention if the second session occurred within 1, 2, or 3 days of the first session. If the second session occurred 4 days after the first, the effects of the two sessions did not cumulate, and retention was no better than that of infants who received only a single training session (p. 73). In the second experiment by Rovee-Collier et al. (1995), the same task was used, but there were only three conditions or groups. The first group received its training 2 days after the initial training, while the second received the second training 4 days after the initial training. Both of these groups received a reactivation treatment 14 days after the initial training (and one day before the long-term retention test). During the reactivation treatment, the experimenter (not the infant) activated the mobile and attempted to recreate the infant s performance from his second session. The third group was a control group. This group received a second training session 2 days after the initial training but did not receive the reactivation treatment. The results indicated a clear advantage for the group whose second session occurred 2 days after the first and who received the reactivation 19
33 treatment. The group that had their second session 4 days after the first performed at baseline on the long-term retention test, just like the control group. In other words, the group whose second session occurred 2 days after the first (ISI=2 days) had the test 13 days later (RI=13 days), while the other group had an ISI of 4 days and a RI of 11 days. Even though there were 2 fewer days between the second study session and the test, the group with the 4-day ISI performed poorer than the group with the longer RI. Overall, Rovee-Collier s (1995) work reveals the critical issue in session-spacing effects is whether or not a second session or study trial will be integrated with the memory of the preceding session or study trial. If it is, then individuals will exhibit a retention advantage; if it is not, then individuals will exhibit retention no better than had they received only a single training session. If sessions are too widely spaced to be integrated, then they are represented in memory as completely independent events that are neither associated nor otherwise linked. (p. 150) Research with children with disabilities. Researchers within the field of special education have also examined the question of massed and distributed practice. Participants have ranged from preschoolers with developmental delays (e.g., Chiara, Schuster, Bell, & Wolery, 1995; Wolery, Doyle, Gast, Ault, & Simpson, 1993) to adolescents with moderate to severe disabilities (e.g., Collins, Evans, Creech-Galloway, Karl, & Miller, 2007). Five studies were reviewed. Three of these studies contrasted massed and distributed practices (Chiara et al., 1995; Jameson, McDonnell, Johnson, Riesen, & Polychronis, 2007; Wolery et al., 1993), one compared two different 20
34 distributed practice schedules within one day (Polychronis, McDonnell, Johnson, Riesen, & Jameson, 2004), and one examined the effects of every day versus every-other-day instruction (Venn et al., 1996). Of particular interest in these studies are the longer RIs. Maintenance tests were conducted from 1 week to 16 weeks after the last day of instruction. Massed versus distributed practice within a day. Two of these studies utilized preschoolers as participants (Chiara et al., 1995; Wolery et al., 1993), while one study involved middle school students with developmental disabilities (Jameson et al., 2007). The tasks in each of the studies employed discrete skills (rather than chained behaviors), and the teaching strategies were a variation of time delay. Wolery et al. (1993) presented massed trials consecutively at the beginning of the morning, while distributed trials were presented during transitions between activities throughout the morning. Chiara et al. (1995) presented the massed trials during small group instruction and presented the distributed trials individually. Jameson et al. (2007) presented the massed trials during children s special education classes and distributed trials during their general education classes. In the massed conditions of each study, trials were always presented consecutively with the same number of trials presented as during the matched distributed condition. In the distributed conditions, 16 trials were spaced throughout the morning with a minimum intertrial interval of 3 minutes (Wolery et al., 1993); 10 trials were spaced throughout a 6.5 hour day with intertrial intervals ranging from minutes (Chiara et al., 1995), or; 3 trials were spaced throughout a single general education class (Jameson et al., 2007). Wolery et al. (1993) reported that instructional trials were 21
35 conducted 4 days/week, while the other two studies simply stated that instruction occurred every day. Results of all three studies indicated that children learned to criterion whether they were in massed or distributed conditions. In other words, both massed and distributed practice sessions were effective for learning. With regard to efficiency, the results were mixed. Wolery et al. (1993) found no substantial differences in efficiency between progressive time delay massed trials and transition-based teaching distributed trials. Chiara et al. (1995) found slightly more efficient learning with the individually distributed conditions (fewer trials to criterion and lower error percentages) compared to the small group massed conditions. However, if just the data from the 2 children with documented deficits in cognition are considered, then the differences between the conditions are more pronounced. Across all children the number of trials to criterion averaged 56 for the massed condition and 45 for the distributed; however, for the 2 children with documented cognitive deficits, the average number of trials to criterion was 110 for the massed and 41 for the distributed. With Jameson et al. (2007) there were differences in efficiency by student. For two of the students, the massed instruction within the special education class resulted in fewer trials to criterion, but for the third student, the embedded condition within the general education class resulted in more efficient learning. For the fourth student, there were no differences between the two conditions. Generalization and maintenance were tested by Wolery et al. (1993) at 1 week for one child and at 1 and 3 weeks after the final probe for another child. Chiara et al. (1995) tested generalization and maintenance at 1, 3, and 5 weeks after the final probe. Both 22
Early Warning System Implementation Guide
Linking Research and Resources for Better High Schools betterhighschools.org September 2010 Early Warning System Implementation Guide For use with the National High School Center s Early Warning System
More informationProcess Evaluations for a Multisite Nutrition Education Program
Process Evaluations for a Multisite Nutrition Education Program Paul Branscum 1 and Gail Kaye 2 1 The University of Oklahoma 2 The Ohio State University Abstract Process evaluations are an often-overlooked
More informationK-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)
K-12 Academic Intervention Plan Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI) September 2016 June 2018 2016 2018 K 12 Academic Intervention Plan Table of Contents AIS Overview...Page
More informationSummary / Response. Karl Smith, Accelerations Educational Software. Page 1 of 8
Summary / Response This is a study of 2 autistic students to see if they can generalize what they learn on the DT Trainer to their physical world. One student did automatically generalize and the other
More informationElizabeth R. Crais, Ph.D., CCC-SLP
Elizabeth R. Crais, Ph.D., CCC-SLP Division of Speech & Hearing Sciences Medical School The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Indiana Speech-Language-Hearing Association April 5, 2013 Linda Watson,
More informationMilton Public Schools Special Education Programs & Supports
Milton Public Schools 2013-14 Special Education Programs & Supports Program Early Childhood Pre-School Integrated Program Substantially Separate Classroom Elementary School Programs Co-taught Classrooms
More informationIEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES
You supply the passion & dedication. IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES We ll support your daily practice. Who s here? ~ Something you want to learn more about 10 Basic Steps in Special Education Child is
More informationSpecial Education Services Program/Service Descriptions
Special Education Services Program/Service Descriptions SES Program/Service Characteristics Specially Designed Instruction Level Class Size Autism (AU) A developmental disability significantly affecting
More informationLongitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers
F I N A L R E P O R T Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers July 8, 2014 Elias Walsh Dallas Dotter Submitted to: DC Education Consortium for Research and Evaluation School of Education
More informationNCEO Technical Report 27
Home About Publications Special Topics Presentations State Policies Accommodations Bibliography Teleconferences Tools Related Sites Interpreting Trends in the Performance of Special Education Students
More informationExaminee Information. Assessment Information
A WPS TEST REPORT by Patti L. Harrison, Ph.D., and Thomas Oakland, Ph.D. Copyright 2010 by Western Psychological Services www.wpspublish.com Version 1.210 Examinee Information ID Number: Sample-02 Name:
More information5 Early years providers
5 Early years providers What this chapter covers This chapter explains the action early years providers should take to meet their duties in relation to identifying and supporting all children with special
More informationPromoting the Social Emotional Competence of Young Children. Facilitator s Guide. Administration for Children & Families
Promoting the Social Emotional Competence of Young Children Facilitator s Guide The Center on the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning Administration for Children & Families Child Care Bureau
More informationSSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017
Image by Photographer s Name (Credit in black type) or Image by Photographer s Name (Credit in white type) Use of the new SSIS-SEL Edition for Screening, Assessing, Intervention Planning, and Progress
More informationEvidence into Practice: An International Perspective. CMHO Conference, Toronto, November 2008
Evidence into Practice: An International Perspective CMHO Conference, Toronto, November 2008 Child and Youth Mental Health Information Network Partners Child and Youth Mental Health Information Network
More informationNo Parent Left Behind
No Parent Left Behind Navigating the Special Education Universe SUSAN M. BREFACH, Ed.D. Page i Introduction How To Know If This Book Is For You Parents have become so convinced that educators know what
More informationKENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING
KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING With Specialist Frameworks for Other Professionals To be used for the pilot of the Other Professional Growth and Effectiveness System ONLY! School Library Media Specialists
More informationRunning head: DELAY AND PROSPECTIVE MEMORY 1
Running head: DELAY AND PROSPECTIVE MEMORY 1 In Press at Memory & Cognition Effects of Delay of Prospective Memory Cues in an Ongoing Task on Prospective Memory Task Performance Dawn M. McBride, Jaclyn
More informationGlenn County Special Education Local Plan Area. SELPA Agreement
Page 1 of 10 Educational Mental Health Related Services, A Tiered Approach Draft Final March 21, 2012 Introduction Until 6-30-10, special education students with severe socio-emotional problems who did
More informationDo multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results
Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? In the past, Boise State has mainly offered one-year scholarships to new freshmen. Recently, however, the institution moved toward offering more two and four-year
More informationRunning Head GAPSS PART A 1
Running Head GAPSS PART A 1 Current Reality and GAPSS Assignment Carole Bevis PL & Technology Innovation (ITEC 7460) Kennesaw State University Ed.S. Instructional Technology, Spring 2014 GAPSS PART A 2
More informationGuidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)
Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU) The UNC Policy Manual The essential educational mission of the University is augmented through a broad range of activities generally categorized
More informationADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools
ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools The district requests an additional year to implement the previously approved turnaround option. Evidence
More informationJEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS BUS 261 BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS. 3 Credit Hours. Prepared by: Cindy Rossi January 25, 2014
JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS BUS 261 BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS 3 Credit Hours Prepared by: Cindy Rossi January 25, 2014 Ms. Linda Abernathy, Math, Science and Business Division Chair Ms. Shirley Davenport,
More informationApplying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings
Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings As Florida s educational system continues to engage in systemic reform resulting in integrated efforts toward
More informationIntroduction to Psychology
Course Title Introduction to Psychology Course Number PSYCH-UA.9001001 SAMPLE SYLLABUS Instructor Contact Information André Weinreich aw111@nyu.edu Course Details Wednesdays, 1:30pm to 4:15pm Location
More informationReviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND
Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND Bewdley Primary School is committed to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children and young people and expects
More informationSpecial Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster
Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster Drayton Infant School Drayton CE Junior School Ghost Hill Infant School & Nursery Nightingale First School Taverham VC CE
More informationDescriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS Statistical Analysis Report June 994 Descriptive Summary of 989 90 Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry Contractor Report Robert Fitzgerald Lutz
More informationSpecial Education Program Continuum
Special Education Program Continuum 2014-2015 Summit Hill School District 161 maintains a full continuum of special education instructional programs, resource programs and related services options based
More informationStrategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing
for Retaining Women Workbook An NCWIT Extension Services for Undergraduate Programs Resource Go to /work.extension.html or contact us at es@ncwit.org for more information. 303.735.6671 info@ncwit.org Strategic
More informationSouth Carolina English Language Arts
South Carolina English Language Arts A S O F J U N E 2 0, 2 0 1 0, T H I S S TAT E H A D A D O P T E D T H E CO M M O N CO R E S TAT E S TA N DA R D S. DOCUMENTS REVIEWED South Carolina Academic Content
More informationTeaching Core Content With Real-Life Applications to Secondary Students With Moderate and Severe Disabilities
U H Reading Rea Teaching Core Content With Real-Life Applications to Secondary Students With Moderate and Severe Disabilities Belva C. Collins j Jennifer Karl \ Leah Riggs Carey C. Galloway Karen D. Hager
More informationUniversity of Arkansas at Little Rock Graduate Social Work Program Course Outline Spring 2014
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Graduate Social Work Program Course Outline Spring 2014 Number and Title: Semester Credits: 3 Prerequisite: SOWK 8390, Advanced Direct Practice III: Social Work Practice
More informationRunning head: DEVELOPING MULTIPLICATION AUTOMATICTY 1. Examining the Impact of Frustration Levels on Multiplication Automaticity.
Running head: DEVELOPING MULTIPLICATION AUTOMATICTY 1 Examining the Impact of Frustration Levels on Multiplication Automaticity Jessica Hanna Eastern Illinois University DEVELOPING MULTIPLICATION AUTOMATICITY
More informationParaprofessional Evaluation: School Year:
Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year: 2014-2015 Name Evaluator Contributing Evaluator Program Grade Site Observat ion Date: Observation Date Post-Conference Date Additional Observation Date-As Needed
More informationMiami-Dade County Public Schools
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND THEIR ACADEMIC PROGRESS: 2010-2011 Author: Aleksandr Shneyderman, Ed.D. January 2012 Research Services Office of Assessment, Research, and Data Analysis 1450 NE Second Avenue,
More informationTITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 25 TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : PERSONNEL Section 25.10 Accredited Institution PART 25 CERTIFICATION
More informationEducational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT
Educational Quality Assurance Standards Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs 2009 2010 Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services Division of K-12 Public Schools Florida Department
More informationQUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESSING THE HANDOUTS AND THE POWERPOINT
Answers to Questions Posed During Pearson aimsweb Webinar: Special Education Leads: Quality IEPs and Progress Monitoring Using Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D. QUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESSING
More informationAssessing Functional Relations: The Utility of the Standard Celeration Chart
Behavioral Development Bulletin 2015 American Psychological Association 2015, Vol. 20, No. 2, 163 167 1942-0722/15/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0101308 Assessing Functional Relations: The Utility
More informationUnit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile
Unit 3 Design Activity Overview Purpose The purpose of the Design Activity unit is to provide students with experience designing a communications product. Students will develop capability with the design
More informationEducation as a Means to Achieve Valued Life Outcomes By Carolyn Das
Too often our special education system allows IEP goals to supersede and replace academic/curriculum goals rather than support progress within the curriculum. This is almost always the case for children
More informationTRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Consultancy Special Education: January 11-12, 2016 Table of Contents District Visit Information 3 Narrative 4 Thoughts in Response to the Questions
More informationImplementing Response to Intervention (RTI) National Center on Response to Intervention
Implementing (RTI) Session Agenda Introduction: What is implementation? Why is it important? (NCRTI) Stages of Implementation Considerations for implementing RTI Ineffective strategies Effective strategies
More informationCONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS
CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS No. 18 (replaces IB 2008-21) April 2012 In 2008, the State Education Department (SED) issued a guidance document to the field regarding the
More informationAuthor: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015
Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) www.angielskiwmedycynie.org.pl Feb 2015 Developing speaking abilities is a prerequisite for HELP in order to promote effective communication
More information$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF
$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF ROCKWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTENT FACILITATOR, DATA ANALYST, AND INSTRUCTIONAL
More informationCooking Matters at the Store Evaluation: Executive Summary
Cooking Matters at the Store Evaluation: Executive Summary Introduction Share Our Strength is a national nonprofit with the goal of ending childhood hunger in America by connecting children with the nutritious
More informationSpecial Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy
Thamesmead School Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy 2016-2017 Person Responsible Governors Committee Review Period P.Rodin Standards & Performance Annually Date of Review July 2016
More informationOmak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan
Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan 2015-2016 Vision Omak School District is committed to success for all students and provides a wide range of high quality instructional programs and
More informationOccupational Therapist (Temporary Position)
Edmonton Catholic Schools is now accepting applications for the position of Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position) Edmonton Catholic Schools is a large urban school district whose mission is to provide
More informationCONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS
CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Introduction Background 1. The Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) requires anyone giving advice
More informationOVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE
OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D. Michelle M. Shinn, Ph.D. Formative Evaluation to Inform Teaching Summative Assessment: Culmination measure. Mastery
More informationLinking object names and object categories: Words (but not tones) facilitate object categorization in 6- and 12-month-olds
Linking object names and object categories: Words (but not tones) facilitate object categorization in 6- and 12-month-olds Anne L. Fulkerson 1, Sandra R. Waxman 2, and Jennifer M. Seymour 1 1 University
More informationSegmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:
Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March 2004 * * * Prepared for: Tulsa Community College Tulsa, OK * * * Conducted by: Render, vanderslice & Associates Tulsa, Oklahoma Project
More informationFY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets
FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets June 8, 2017 The FY 2018 School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location worksheet
More informationPh.D. in Behavior Analysis Ph.d. i atferdsanalyse
Program Description Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis Ph.d. i atferdsanalyse 180 ECTS credits Approval Approved by the Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education (NOKUT) on the 23rd April 2010 Approved
More informationStudent-led IEPs 1. Student-led IEPs. Student-led IEPs. Greg Schaitel. Instructor Troy Ellis. April 16, 2009
Student-led IEPs 1 Student-led IEPs Student-led IEPs Greg Schaitel Instructor Troy Ellis April 16, 2009 Student-led IEPs 2 Students with disabilities are often left with little understanding about their
More informationTools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series
RSS RSS Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series DEVELOPED BY the Accreditation council for continuing medical education December 2005; Updated JANUARY 2008
More informationEvidence for Reliability, Validity and Learning Effectiveness
PEARSON EDUCATION Evidence for Reliability, Validity and Learning Effectiveness Introduction Pearson Knowledge Technologies has conducted a large number and wide variety of reliability and validity studies
More informationCriterion Met? Primary Supporting Y N Reading Street Comprehensive. Publisher Citations
Program 2: / Arts English Development Basic Program, K-8 Grade Level(s): K 3 SECTIO 1: PROGRAM DESCRIPTIO All instructional material submissions must meet the requirements of this program description section,
More informationEffective Instruction for Struggling Readers
Section II Effective Instruction for Struggling Readers Chapter 5 Components of Effective Instruction After conducting assessments, Ms. Lopez should be aware of her students needs in the following areas:
More informationBSP !!! Trainer s Manual. Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University. M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon
Basic FBA to BSP Trainer s Manual Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon Chris Borgmeier, Ph.D. Portland State University Robert Horner,
More informationSpecial Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)
Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability) To be reviewed annually Chair of Governors, Lyn Schlich Signed January 2017 East Preston Infant School SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS [SEN] POLICY CONTENTS
More informationAvailability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says
Wednesday, October 2, 2002 http://chronicle.com/daily/2002/10/2002100206n.htm Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says As the average price of attending
More informationWhat is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols
What is PDE? Research Report Paul Nichols December 2013 WHAT IS PDE? 1 About Pearson Everything we do at Pearson grows out of a clear mission: to help people make progress in their lives through personalized
More informationStrategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013
Georgia Network for Educational and Therapeutic Support (GNETS) Strategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013 Introduction The Georgia Network for Educational and Therapeutic Support (GNETS) is comprised
More informationClinical Review Criteria Related to Speech Therapy 1
Clinical Review Criteria Related to Speech Therapy 1 I. Definition Speech therapy is covered for restoration or improved speech in members who have a speechlanguage disorder as a result of a non-chronic
More informationTHE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK
THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK Released in 2000, the Head Start Child Outcomes Framework is intended to guide Head Start programs in their curriculum planning and ongoing assessment of the progress
More informationInstructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.
Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process and Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CLD) Students Guidelines and Resources
More informationPSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016
PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016 Instructor: Gary Alderman Office Location: Kinard 110B Office Hours: Mon: 11:45-3:30; Tues: 10:30-12:30 Email: aldermang@winthrop.edu Phone:
More informationACCOUNTING FOR MANAGERS BU-5190-AU7 Syllabus
HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION MBA ACCOUNTING FOR MANAGERS BU-5190-AU7 Syllabus Winter 2010 P LYMOUTH S TATE U NIVERSITY, C OLLEGE OF B USINESS A DMINISTRATION 1 Page 2 PLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITY College of
More informationGeorge Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education
George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education 1 EDSE 590: Research Methods in Special Education Instructor: Margo A. Mastropieri, Ph.D. Assistant: Judy Ericksen Section
More informationA Game-based Assessment of Children s Choices to Seek Feedback and to Revise
A Game-based Assessment of Children s Choices to Seek Feedback and to Revise Maria Cutumisu, Kristen P. Blair, Daniel L. Schwartz, Doris B. Chin Stanford Graduate School of Education Please address all
More informationRote rehearsal and spacing effects in the free recall of pure and mixed lists. By: Peter P.J.L. Verkoeijen and Peter F. Delaney
Rote rehearsal and spacing effects in the free recall of pure and mixed lists By: Peter P.J.L. Verkoeijen and Peter F. Delaney Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L, & Delaney, P. F. (2008). Rote rehearsal and spacing
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview Section 11.515, Florida Statutes, was created by the 1996 Florida Legislature for the purpose of conducting performance reviews of school districts in Florida. The statute
More informationTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS ELIZABETH ANNE SOMERS Spring 2011 A thesis submitted in partial
More informationUniversity-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in
University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in 2014-15 In this policy brief we assess levels of program participation and
More informationStatus of the MP Profession in Europe
Status of the MP Profession in Europe John Damilakis, MSc, PhD Prof. of Medical Physics Faculty of Medicine University of Crete, Greece IOMP Chair, E&T Committee EFOMP Vice-President (2014) Basic education:
More informationTeaching Language Skills to Preschool Students with Developmental Delays and Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Language for Learning
Teaching Language Skills to Preschool Students with Developmental Delays and Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Language for Learning Margaret M. Flores Kelly B. Schweck Vanessa Hinton Auburn University Abstract
More informationThe Efficacy of PCI s Reading Program - Level One: A Report of a Randomized Experiment in Brevard Public Schools and Miami-Dade County Public Schools
The Efficacy of PCI s Reading Program - Level One: A Report of a Randomized Experiment in Brevard Public Schools and Miami-Dade County Public Schools Megan Toby Boya Ma Andrew Jaciw Jessica Cabalo Empirical
More informationWonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13
Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade Wonderworks Tier II Intervention Program (K 5) Guidance for using K 1st, Grade 2 & Grade 3 5 Flowcharts This document provides guidelines to school site personnel
More informationTHE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy
The Queen s Church of England Primary School Encouraging every child to reach their full potential, nurtured and supported in a Christian community which lives by the values of Love, Compassion and Respect.
More informationCooper Upper Elementary School
LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS www.livoniapublicschools.org/cooper 213-214 BOARD OF EDUCATION 213-14 Mark Johnson, President Colleen Burton, Vice President Dianne Laura, Secretary Tammy Bonifield, Trustee Dan
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide (Revised) for Teachers Updated August 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction to DPAS II Purpose of
More informationExtending Learning Across Time & Space: The Power of Generalization
Extending Learning: The Power of Generalization 1 Extending Learning Across Time & Space: The Power of Generalization Teachers have every right to celebrate when they finally succeed in teaching struggling
More informationHDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 Version: 2.01
HDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 To be read in conjunction with: Research Practice Policy Version: 2.01 Last amendment: 02 April 2014 Next Review: Apr 2016 Approved By: Academic Board Date:
More informationPerson Centered Positive Behavior Support Plan (PC PBS) Report Scoring Criteria & Checklist (Rev ) P. 1 of 8
Scoring Criteria & Checklist (Rev. 3 5 07) P. 1 of 8 Name: Case Name: Case #: Rater: Date: Critical Features Note: The plan needs to meet all of the critical features listed below, and needs to obtain
More informationRAP: A Reading Comprehension Strategy for Students with Learning Disabilities and Concomitant Speech-Language Impairments or ADHD
RAP: A Reading Comprehension Strategy for Students with Learning Disabilities and Concomitant Speech-Language Impairments or ADHD Suzanne E. Kemp (Corresponding Author) University of Nebraska-Lincoln 353
More informationGetting Results Continuous Improvement Plan
Page of 9 9/9/0 Department of Education Market Street Harrisburg, PA 76-0 Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan 0-0 Principal Name: Ms. Sharon Williams School Name: AGORA CYBER CS District Name:
More informationWorldwide Online Training for Coaches: the CTI Success Story
Worldwide Online Training for Coaches: the CTI Success Story Case Study: CTI (The Coaches Training Institute) This case study covers: Certification Program Professional Development Corporate Use icohere,
More informationRAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI
RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI Agenda Introductions Definitions History of the work Strategies Next steps Debrief
More informationLecture 2: Quantifiers and Approximation
Lecture 2: Quantifiers and Approximation Case study: Most vs More than half Jakub Szymanik Outline Number Sense Approximate Number Sense Approximating most Superlative Meaning of most What About Counting?
More informationFinal Teach For America Interim Certification Program
Teach For America Interim Certification Program Program Rubric Overview The Teach For America (TFA) Interim Certification Program Rubric was designed to provide formative and summative feedback to TFA
More informationSPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM (Revised 11/2014) 1 Fern Ridge Schools Specialist Performance Review and Evaluation System TABLE OF CONTENTS Timeline of Teacher Evaluation and Observations
More informationHow to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test
How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test Technical Bulletin #6 Evaluation and Examination Service The University of Iowa (319) 335-0356 HOW TO JUDGE THE QUALITY OF AN OBJECTIVE CLASSROOM
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide for Administrators (Assistant Principals) Guide for Evaluating Assistant Principals Revised August
More informationSanta Fe Community College Teacher Academy Student Guide 1
Santa Fe Community College Teacher Academy Student Guide Student Guide 1 We believe that ALL students can succeed and it is the role of the teacher to nurture, inspire, and motivate ALL students to succeed.
More informationPROVIDING AND COMMUNICATING CLEAR LEARNING GOALS. Celebrating Success THE MARZANO COMPENDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES
PROVIDING AND COMMUNICATING CLEAR LEARNING GOALS Celebrating Success THE MARZANO COMPENDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES Celebrating Success Copyright 2016 by Marzano Research Materials appearing here are
More information