Jacksonville High School School Report Card Linda Lane Jacksonville, AR

Transcription

1 Jacksonville High School School Report Card Linda Lane Jacksonville, AR SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS Principal Superintendent STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS Jacob Smith Jerry Guess 2016 Enrollment 838. Class Size 16. years teaching Experience 8 Per pupil spending District avg. $11,544 State avg. $9,701 School Choice Transfers 0 School Rating N/A Act 20 of 2016 states that for the school year, the Arkansas Department of Education shall not assign school ratings under Race/Ethnicity Statistics 0.2 % American Indian / Alaskan 1.3 % Asian 61.8 % Black / African American 0.1 % Hawaiian / Pacific Islander 5.3 % Hispanic / Latino 27.8 % White 3.5 % Two or More Races Limited English proficiency Low income Other Demographics 2 % 64 % Students eligible to receive special education 14 %

2 INDICATOR: Achievement Tested Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Prof or Advanced Not Met Partially Met Approached Expectations Expectations Expectations Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations District Met or Exceeded State Met or Exceeded In Need of Support Close Ready Ready or District Ready or State Ready or 9th Grade Literacy Combined Population TAGG African American Hispanic RV RV RV RV RV RV Caucasian Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient RV RV RV RV RV RV RV RV RV RV RV RV Number of recently arrived LEP students not assessed in 9th Grade Literacy RV Female Male Migrant 10th Grade Literacy Combined Population TAGG African American Hispanic RV RV RV RV RV RV Caucasian Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient RV RV RV RV RV RV RV RV RV RV RV RV Number of recently arrived LEP students not assessed in 10th Grade Literacy RV Female Male Migrant Page: 1

3 INDICATOR: Achievement Tested Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Prof or Advanced 2014 AMO Not Met Partially Met Approached Expectations Expectations Expectations Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations District Met or Exceeded State Met or Exceeded In Need of Support Close Ready Ready or District Ready or State Ready or 9th Grade Mathematics Combined Population TAGG African American Hispanic Caucasian Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient RV RV RV RV RV RV Female Male Migrant 10th Grade Mathematics Combined Population TAGG African American Hispanic RV RV RV RV RV RV Caucasian Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient RV RV RV RV RV RV Female Male Migrant 2016 Page: 2

4 INDICATOR: Achievement Tested Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Prof or Advanced Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Prof or Advanced District Prof or Adv. State Prof or Adv. In Need of Support Close Ready Ready or District Ready or State Ready or 9th Grade Science Combined Population TAGG African American Hispanic Caucasian Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient RV RV RV RV RV RV Female Male Migrant 10th Grade Science Combined Population TAGG African American Hispanic RV RV RV RV RV RV Caucasian Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient RV RV RV RV RV RV Female Male Migrant 2016 Page: 3

5 INDICATOR: Achievement Value Added Student Academic Growth Number Eligible Math % Meeting Growth Math Number Eligible Literacy % Meeting Growth Literacy Math Value Added Score ELA Value Added Score Weighted Average ELA + Math School Growth Score Math Value Added Score ELA Value Added Score Weighted Average ELA + Math School Growth Score Combined Population NA NA NA NA TAGG NA NA NA NA African American NA NA NA NA Hispanic NA NA NA NA Caucasian NA NA NA NA Economically Disadvantaged NA NA NA NA Students with Disabilities NA NA NA NA Limited English Proficient NA NA NA NA 2016 Page: 4

6 INDICATOR: Achievement Grade One Reading Comprehension Grade One Math Problems Grade Two Reading Comprehension Grade Two Math Problems Grade Three Reading Grade Three Math Grade Four Reading Grade Four Math Grade Five Reading Grade Five Math Grade Five Science Grade Six Reading Grade Six Math Grade Seven Reading Grade Seven Math Grade Seven Science Grade Eight Reading Grade Eight Math Grade Nine Reading Comprehension Grade Nine Math Concepts and Problems Page: 5

7 INDICATOR: Achievement American College Test (ACT) Participation in Grade 11 Statewide ACT Administration ,152 Number of Students Taking Voluntary Universal ACT 7,110 8,790 District Provided Remediation for Students Taking Voluntary Universal ACT Number of Students in College and Career Readiness Planning Program (CCRPP) 1,843 2, ,331 Number of Students Taking ACT in Grades , , ,155 39,564 Number of Students Taking ACT in Grade , , ,966 ACT Reading ACT English ACT Mathematics ACT Science ACT Composite SAT by College Board Number of Students Taking SAT College Admission Test SAT Critical Reading Mean RV RV RV SAT Math Mean RV RV RV SAT Writing Mean RV RV RV Advanced Placement Courses (AP) Number of Students Taking Advanced Placement (AP) Courses , , ,827 Number of AP Exams Taken 162 1,675 44, ,629 44, ,693 46,094 Number of AP Exams Scored 3, 4, or , , ,079 Number of Students Taking International Baccalaureate Courses 460 1, College Going Rate All Students 38.9 % 42.7 % 51.5 % 51.9 % 57.3 % 55.3 % 36.9 % 45.7 % 50.5 % African American 38.4 % 46.2 % 51.5 % 58.5 % 54.2 % 34.6 % 45.3 % 46.7 % Hispanic 0.0 % 33.2 % 60.0 % 39.6 % 39.5 % 40.0 % 37.1 % 38.9 % Caucasian 38.9 % 50.6 % 53.5 % 58.6 % 58.3 % 42.1 % 46.3 % 53.7 % Economically Disadvantaged 49.0 % 53.6 % 46.9 % 32.9 % 41.4 % 42.3 % Students with Disabilities 32.0 % 34.0 % 22.4 % 10.5 % 18.3 % 20.1 % Limited English Proficient 66.7 % 36.4 % 30.2 % 0.0 % 11.1 % 31.4 %

8 2016 Page: 6

9 INDICATOR: Achievement College Credit Accumulation Rate All Students 72.4 % 77.3 % 79.7 % 18.8 % 25.3 % 35.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 1.2 % African American 70.3 % 71.6 % 69.9 % 13.5 % 16.7 % 19.8 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.3 % Hispanic 56.9 % 72.0 % 79.0 % 33.3 % 26.3 % 29.5 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 1.0 % Caucasian 78.0 % 83.2 % 82.4 % 16.1 % 33.3 % 39.8 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 1.4 % Economically Disadvantaged 12.5 % 17.6 % 24.9 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 1.0 % Students with Disabilities 12.5 % 14.7 % 11.7 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Limited English Proficient 50.0 % 25.0 % 21.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.4 % * The College Credit Accumulation Rate definition from the US. Department of Education gives high school graduates two years at an institution of higher education to complete at least one year s worth of college credit that is applicable to a degree. Students graduating in school year and school year have not yet had two years to complete a year of college credit Page: 7

10 INDICATOR: School Performance Arkansas ESEA Accountability Needs Improvement N N N Needs Improvement Priority Y 3 36 Y 4 46 Y 4 42 Needs Improvement Priority Met Year 1 Exit Criteria N 0 1 N 0 3 N 1 2 Needs Improvement Focus N 3 81 N N 3 87 Needs Improvement Focus Met Year 1 Exit Criteria N 0 4 N 2 31 N 0 11 Achieving N 1 67 N 1 73 N 2 91 Exemplary N 0 1 N 0 0 N 0 0 School Rating School Rating C D N/A Overall Points for School Rating N/A Count of Schools with Rating = A ( Points ) N/A N/A Count of Schools with Rating = B ( Points ) N/A N/A Count of Schools with Rating = C ( Points ) N/A N/A Count of Schools with Rating = D ( Points ) N/A N/A Count of Schools with Rating = F ( Less than 180 Points ) N/A N/A Act 20 of 2016 states that for the school year, the Arkansas Department of Education shall not assign school ratings under Page: 8

11 INDICATOR: School Performance District Provides Textbooks or Digital Resources for all Pupils District Provides Textbooks or Digital Resources for all Pupils Y 100 % Y 100 % Y 100 % Annual Accreditation Status Annual Accreditation Status Accredited Y Y Y Accredited Cited N N N Accredited Probationary N 0 27 N 0 21 N 0 10 Attendance Rate (*State Goal 91.13%) Attendance Rate Combined 91.4 % 93.8 % 94.4 % 90.3 % 93.6 % 94.4 % 90.1 % 93.2 % 94.5 % Attendance Rate for Targeted Acheivement Gap Group 91.0 % 93.5 % 94.0 % 91.0 % 93.9 % 94.6 % 90.8 % 93.6 % 94.7 % Attendance Rate African American 92.8 % 94.0 % 94.3 % 91.9 % 94.0 % 94.5 % 90.4 % 93.7 % 94.3 % Attendance Rate Hispanic 91.9 % 93.9 % 94.8 % 90.0 % 93.7 % 95.0 % 93.4 % 93.2 % 95.0 % Attendance Rate Caucasian 90.0 % 93.4 % 94.3 % 88.2 % 93.0 % 94.2 % 87.6 % 92.7 % 94.3 % Attendance Rate Economically Disadvantaged 90.6 % 93.3 % 93.8 % 91.6 % 94.1 % 94.8 % 91.0 % 93.9 % 94.9 % Attendance Rate Students with Disabilities 91.6 % 93.7 % 94.1 % 91.3 % 93.7 % 94.1 % 90.5 % 93.2 % 94.3 % Attendance Rate Limited English Proficient 91.8 % 94.2 % 95.3 % 87.1 % 94.2 % 95.4 % 92.5 % 93.6 % 95.3 % Dropout Rate Dropout Rate 8.19 % 3.43 % 2.10 % 6.72 % 2.89 % 2.25 % 7.40 % 3.64 % 2.32 % 2016 Page: 9

12 INDICATOR: School Performance Graduation Rate (*State Goal 85%) Graduation Rate Combined 66.0 % 72.7 % 86.9 % 70.1 % 71.8 % 84.9 % 71.1 % 78.0 % 87.0 % Graduation Rate for Targeted Acheivement Gap Group 68.1 % 66.6 % 82.9 % 69.1 % 66.5 % 81.9 % 68.2 % 74.7 % 83.8 % Graduation Rate African American 69.9 % 72.1 % 81.0 % 68.2 % 71.3 % 77.5 % 77.1 % 80.1 % 81.5 % Graduation Rate Hispanic RV 72.0 % 84.5 % 71.4 % 60.8 % 84.5 % RV 58.7 % 85.7 % Graduation Rate Caucasian 57.6 % 72.8 % 89.3 % 69.1 % 72.6 % 87.4 % 58.8 % 77.0 % 89.2 % Graduation Rate Economically Disadvantaged 68.6 % 66.2 % 82.7 % 66.2 % 63.6 % 81.7 % 69.1 % 74.8 % 83.8 % Graduation Rate Students with Disabilities 73.9 % 69.4 % 83.1 % 73.5 % 73.0 % 81.9 % 73.1 % 80.3 % 84.3 % Graduation Rate Limited English Proficient RV 90.0 % 84.1 % RV 73.3 % 85.9 % RV 66.7 % 85.7 % Grade Inflation Rate (EOC) 3.8 % 5.6 % 7 % Grade Inflation Rate (ACT) % % % % % % % % % College Remediation Rate 85.2 % 59.8 % 45.4 % 77.3 % 65.1 % 54.2 % 76.3 % 65.7 % 56.9 % Enrollment October 1 Enrollment , , , , , , Page: 10

13 INDICATOR: School Environment Discipline Policies Distributed to Parents Y 100 % 100 % Y 100 % 100 % Y 100 % 100 % Discipline Training Provided to Staff Y 100 % 100 % Y 100 % 100 % Y 100 % 100 % Parental Involvement Plan Adopted Y 100 % 100 % Y 100 % 100 % Y 100 % 100 % District Alternative Learning Environment Compliance Y % Y % Y % Expulsions Weapons Incidents Staff Assaults Student Assaults , , , Page: 11

14 INDICATOR: Retention Number of Students Retained at Grade , , ,130 Percent of Students Retained at Grade % 5.00 % 6.00 % 3.00 % 2.00 % 3.00 % Number of Students Retained at Grade Percent of Students Retained at Grade % 3.00 % 1.00 % 1.00 % 1.00 % 1.00 % Number of Students Retained at Grade Percent of Students Retained at Grade % 2.00 % 1.00 % 1.00 % 1.00 % 1.00 % Number of Students Retained at Grade Percent of Students Retained at Grade % 2.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Number of Students Retained at Grade Percent of Students Retained at Grade % 1.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Number of Students Retained at Grade Percent of Students Retained at Grade % 1.00 % 1.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % Number of Students Retained at Grade Percent of Students Retained at Grade % 2.00 % 2.00 % 1.00 % 1.00 % 1.00 % Number of Students Retained at Grade Percent of Students Retained at Grade % 1.00 % 2.00 % 1.00 % 1.00 % 1.00 % 2016 Page: 12

15 INDICATOR: Teacher Quality % Teachers Completely Certified (Licensed) % 98.9 % 95.7 % % 99.5 % 98.8 % 96.0 % 98.2 % 99.5 % % Teachers with Emergency / Provisional Credentials 2.5 % 1.6 % 0.8 % 0.0 % 0.8 % 0.4 % 1.3 % 1.0 % 0.2 % % Teachers with Bachelor's Degree 37.0 % 53.0 % 57.0 % 30.0 % 54.0 % 56.0 % 32.0 % 53.0 % 55.0 % % Teachers with Master's Degree 58.0 % 44.0 % 41.0 % 63.0 % 44.0 % 41.0 % 55.0 % 44.0 % 41.0 % % Teachers with Advanced Degree 2.0 % 1.0 % 1.0 % 4.0 % 1.0 % 1.0 % 2.0 % 1.0 % 1.0 % HQ Teachers in High Poverty Schools % Core Academic Classes not Taught by HQ Teachers 0.0 % 0.6 % 0.9 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 1.4 % 0.0 % 1.6 % 2.0 % HQ Teachers in Low Poverty Schools % Core Academic Classes not Taught by HQ Teachers 0.0 % 4.1 % 0.6 % 0.0 % 3.6 % 0.7 % 0.0 % 4.2 % 0.7 % HQ Teachers Aggregate of All Economic Levels % Core Academic Classes not Taught by HQ Teachers 7.0 % 2.3 % 0.7 % 0.0 % 1.7 % 0.9 % 1.6 % 2.6 % 1.2 % School Board Members Hours of Training Mike Kemp 6.00 Linda Remele 6.00 Tina Ward 6.00 Shelby Thomas 6.00 Alicia Gillin 6.00 Brian Maune 0.00 Eli Keller Page: 13

16 INDICATOR: School Choice Percent of Students School Choice 0.00 % 0.13 % 2.82 % 0.00 % 0.13 % 2.59 % 0.00 % 0.16 % 2.76 % 2016 Page: 14

17 INDICATOR: School Funding Mills Voted Expenditure Per Student $11,115 $9,457 $11,284 $9,642 $11,544 $9,701 Average Teacher Salary $51,946 $48,060 $52,979 $50,978 $54,382 $51,466 Total Expenditures $210,513,920 $5,288,037,508 $206,692,414 $5,203,284,363 $211,861,220 $5,271,887,226 Instructional Expenditures $99,500,321 $2,500,807,896 $99,222,340 $2,529,267,639 $97,229,989 $2,547,814,529 Administrative Expenditures $13,845,614 $325,831,774 $13,714,025 $333,081,526 $17,560,764 $338,671,942 Extracurricular Expenditures $3,520,238 $174,851,754 $4,397,301 $181,590,712 $4,221,365 $177,007,641 Capital Expenditures $12,693,016 $423,083,973 $12,266,346 $510,124,487 $16,399,174 $530,477,579 Debt Service Expenditures $10,268,099 $285,311,300 $10,443,312 $245,124,316 $9,985,831 $261,403,249 Free and Reduced Meals Percent of Students Eligible for Free and Reduced Meals 64.7 % 55.6 % 60.9 % 62.9 % 57.3 % 61.8 % 64.0 % 60.2 % 62.9 % State Free and Reduced Price Meal Rate*** 61.2 % 61.1 % 61.2 % National Free and Reduced Price Meal Rate** 52.1 % 55.5 % 56.8 % **Source: FNS National databank for federal fiscal year ***State Free and Reduced Meal Rate includes preschool and adult education students Page: 15