Implicit and Explicit Knowledge Decay at Different Rates: A Dissociation Between Priming and Recognition in Artificial Grammar Learning
|
|
- Alisha Bailey
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Implicit and Explicit Knowledge Decay at Different Rates: A Dissociation Between Priming and Recognition in Artificial Grammar Learning Richard J. Tunney University College London, UK Abstract. An experiment tested the common assumption that implicit and explicit knowledge are forgotten at different rates. In a training phase participants responded to sequences of letters generated by a finite-state grammar by pressing corresponding letters on a keyboard. A control group responded to randomized sequences. Participants were tested immediately following training and after intervals of seven and fourteen days. During each test participants responded to the letters of old and new sequences, and performed a concurrent recognition test. Priming was indexed by the time taken to respond to the sequences. In the immediate test both priming and recognition were substantially greater than the control group. In the delayed tests the level of priming remained unchanged but recognition had declined. The data indicate that priming and recognition decay at different rates, and are discussed with reference to both single and dual process models of memory. Key words: implicit learning, forgetting, retention, priming, recognition A key claim of many theories of cognition is that priming and recognition are dissociable, reflecting distinct implicit and explicit memory processes. In particular, explicit memory, such as recognition, is thought to be relatively fragile in comparison to implicit forms of memory, such as priming. For example, there is evidence that implicit processes are preserved in the face of amnesia or divided attention while explicit processes are certainly impaired (e.g., Gabrieli, 1998). One commonly held assumption about memory is that implicit and explicit knowledge are forgotten or decay at different rates (e.g., Berry & Dienes, 1993; Reber, 1989). Despite this, little work has directly questioned whether this is indeed the case. I thank Martina Niemela for helping collect some of the data, and David Shanks for much help and support during my time at UCL. This work was supported by the ESRC Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution. DOI: // Early work using the traditional materials of implicit memory, such as word-identification or wordstem completion, produced equivocal results. Some workers have observed different patterns of forgetting on direct and indirect tests, while others have found similar patterns. For instance, Tulving, Schacter, and Stark (1982) found priming on wordfragment completion persisted over days and weeks, while recognition declined. More recently McBride and Dosher (1997) compared implicit and explicit versions of stem-completion that differed solely in whether participants were instructed to use the first word that came to mind or a word that they had seen earlier. In contrast to Tulving et al. (1982), McBride and Dosher (1997) observed similar patterns of decay on both measures. A good deal of research has examined the relationship between priming and recognition in implicit learning paradigms. A common feature of many implicit learning tasks is the acquisition of sequential
2 Decay of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge 125 information in which participants learn by responding to events constrained by a simple system of rules. Participants knowledge may be expressed either indirectly as priming, via reduction in response latency to predictable targets, or directly via recognition, prediction, or generation tests thought to require explicit knowledge. It seems that many of our preferences, skills, and habits are learned in this way. One such paradigm, in which knowledge is thought to be retained for long periods, is artificial grammar learning. Artificial Grammar Learning In a typical artificial grammar learning experiment participants study sequences of letters that, unknown to them, are generated by an artificial grammar (see Figure 1). After this study period, participants are informed that the training sequences were constructed using some simple rules. Participants are then presented with previously unseen sequences, some of which can be generated by the grammar and some of which cannot, and are asked to discriminate between the two on the basis of their adherence to the grammar. Reber and Allen (1978) found the percentage of correct classifications immediately following study to be 81%. Two years later, and with no intervening exposure to the study materials, the same participants classified 68% of sequences correctly (Allen & Reber, 1980). Participants were not informed during the original study that they would be recalled two years later so it seems unlikely that they would have spent any of the intervening period Figure 1. The artificial grammar used to generate stimuli. Grammatical sequences are generated by traversing the nodes of the grammar from left to right and collecting letters from each transition. Ungrammatical sequences were generated by rearranging one or two letters of grammatical sequences so that they no longer conform to the grammar. rehearsing the materials. These grammaticality decisions are frequently considered to be based on implicit knowledge of the grammar. Although there has been substantial debate about what kind of information participants actually learn by studying artificial languages, there is some consensus that much of the knowledge expressed at test is composed of fragments of the sequences studied earlier (e.g., Dulany, Carlson, & Dewey, 1984; Perruchet & Pacteau, 1990). For instance, if a participant studies a sequence such as MTVRVX, at test they might remember having seen the fragment MTV. The presence of this fragment in a previously unseen sequence shown at test makes the new sequence similar to the old one enabling it to be processed more fluently than dissimilar sequences. This fluency primes the classification of the new sequences. Dual process models of memory argue that in addition to fluency, discriminations may also be predicated on conscious recollection. One piece of evidence suggests that familiarity and recollective components of recognition might decay at different rates. Higham, Vokey, and Pritchard (2000; Experiment 2) asked participants to study sequences generated by two grammars. Immediately after the study period participants were asked to classify old and new sequences, some of which belonged to the earlier studied grammars and some of which belonged to neither. According to the logic adopted by Higham et al. (2000), the attribution of sequences to the correct grammar was due to recollective and familiarity based influences on classification, while the attribution of sequences to the wrong grammar reflected familiarity based influences alone. When Higham et al. repeated the test seven days later they found that classifications based on recollection had decreased but those based on familiarity had not, suggesting that implicit and explicit memory of the grammars had decayed at different rates. However, whether or not recollective and familiarity influences on recognition truly reflect dissociable memory processes, is a source of considerable debate (see Foster & Jelicic, 1999). Priming in artificial grammar learning supports reaction time advantages as well as discrimination. Knowledge of fragments reflects the transitional dependencies of the grammar, and as in serial reaction time learning, this priming supports a reaction time advantage for probable over improbable transitions (e.g., Cleeremans, 1993). Dissociations have been observed between discrimination-based measures that make reference to the study episode and reaction time savings that make no such reference. For instance, Seger (1998) observed that although participants were able to discriminate between grammatical and ungrammatical sequences when composed of a different set of letters, they were unable to transfer
3 126 Richard J. Tunney the reaction time advantage for old over new sequences that they had exhibited in the original vocabulary. This finding converges with serial reaction time learning in the suggestion that recognition and motor-based learning can be dissociated. In particular, motor-learning appears to be relatively spared by amnesia (e.g., Willingham, Nissen, & Bullemer, 1989). More importantly, at least some forms of motor-learning appear to be retained for long periods of time (Adams, 1987).The nature of the motor-responses seems to make a difference to the rate of decay. Continuous responses, such as tracking, may be retained for longer periods than discrete responses such as button presses (Adams, 1987). Deficits in explicit memory, such as amnesia or Alzheimer s disease, do not appear to impair the acquisition of sequences of motor responses. Nissen, Willingham, and Hartman (1989) examined the retention of sequence knowledge in both amnesic and age-matched controls. Both the amnesics and the controls retained a reaction time advantage for old over new sequences over a one-week period. Similar results have been observed in patients with Alzheimer s disease (Knopman, 1991). The retention of sequence knowledge is not, however, unbounded. Willingham and Dumas (1997) observed that that normal participants did not retain sequence knowledge over a one-year interval. However, because recognition performance in these studies was not measured, it is not clear whether priming and recognition decay at the same or different rates. Moreover, because recognition of this form of sequence learning is generally poor, even in normal control groups (e.g., Destrebecqz & Cleeremans, 2001), any estimate of the decay of recognition over time would, if observed, be confounded by floor effects. Stimuli that consist of sequences of letters generated by an artificial grammar have the advantage that recognition is relatively higher than for stimuli composed of response locations, thus permitting forgetting to be observed. To date no study has examined the rates at which recognition is retained over time relative to priming (in the form of reaction-time savings) in artificial grammar learning. In the following experiment participants were trained to respond to sequences of letters generated by an artificial grammar by pressing the corresponding letters on a keyboard. Immediately after, they were asked to respond to more sequences, some old and some new. After each sequence participants were asked whether they recognized the sequence. Rates of decay were measured by repeating the test on a further two occasions with an interval of seven days between sessions. Method Participants Twenty-four young adults from the University College London community volunteered for this study, twelve male and twelve female. All were naïve to the purpose of the study. Participants were assigned to either a trained group or a control group. Materials There were two kinds of training sequence and two kinds of test sequence. Nineteen grammatical sequences were generated using the finite-state grammar shown in Figure 1. Sequences were composed of the letters M, T, V, R, and X and varied in length from between 3 and 7 letters (mean length = 6.31 letters). The trained group were presented with the grammatical sequences five times during training. The order in which the grammatical sequences were presented was randomized within each block. Control participants were presented with scrambled versions of the training sequences Ð the letters in each grammatical sequence was randomized in each of the five blocks. Thus control participants were not exposed to any of the contingencies in the grammatical sequences but to sequences composed of the same letters and length as the grammatical sequences. The same nineteen grammatical sequences were presented at test mixed with nineteen ungrammatical sequences. These were the grammatical and ungrammatical sequences used by Brooks and Vokey (1991). The ungrammatical sequences were differentiated from the grammatical sequences by rearranging two or more letters into positions not permitted by the grammar, but were of identical length and composed of the same letters as the grammatical sequences. The whole test set was presented twice on each session in a random order to both groups of participants. The materials used for each test were identical on all three sessions. Training Procedure At the start of the experiment participants were given a brief verbal description of the experiment. The following instructions were presented on screen. Thank you for agreeing to take part in this experiment. Your task is simple Ð you will see sequences of letters appear one letter at a time in the center of the screen. The words START and END signal the start and end of each sequence. At these prompts simply press the space bar. During each sequence simply press the corresponding
4 Decay of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge 127 letter on the keyboard as quickly as you can. Once you have pressed the key a new letter will appear and again press the corresponding key. Try to work as quickly as you can while making as few errors as possible. The training phase began once the participant had read the instructions. Participants were not informed at this stage that they would later receive a recognition test or that they would be asked to return for subsequent tests. Each sequence began after the word START appeared on screen and participants pressed the space bar. Each letter of the sequence appeared on screen for an unlimited time and disappeared when the corresponding key was pressed on the keyboard. Two hundred milliseconds later the next letter appeared, and so on. The end of each sequence was indicated by the appearance of the word END, which prompted participants to press the space bar to begin the next sequence. The training sequences were presented five times in different randomized orders. Testing procedure At the end of the training phase participants were presented with the following set of instructions. You may now take a short break. This part of the experiment is identical to the first Ð each sequence of letters begins with the word START and ends with the word END. At these prompts press the space bar. In the center of the screen you will then see a letter, simply press the corresponding key on the keyboard as quickly as you can. Once you have pressed the key a new letter will appear and again press the corresponding key. Try to work as quickly as you can while making as few errors as possible. After the end of each sequence you will be asked if you recognize the sequence from the previous training phase. After the end prompt of each sequence participants were asked whether they had seen the sequence before by pressing one of two buttons marked yes, I have seen the sequence before and no, I have not seen the sequence before. There were three test phases: the first immediately followed the training phase, the second 7 days later, and the third 14 days later. The second and third test phases were identical to the first with the exception that participants were instructed to try to recognize sequences from the original training phase and not the previous test phase. After the initial test phase participants were asked to return for a follow up session 7 days later, they were not informed of the third session until after the second session. Results Reaction-time savings were calculated by subtracting the mean-response time for grammatical sequences from the mean-response time for ungrammatical sequences. The time taken to respond to the START and END prompts was not entered into any analysis. In addition, extreme reaction times to individual letters were removed from the analyses. These were defined as reaction times to individual letters that exceeded ð 2 standard deviations from each participant s mean reaction time. Note that reaction times to whole sequences were not omitted since the priming scores were calculated by averaging response times to sequences over individual letters. Table 1 shows the mean priming score for each group on each session. The reaction-time savings were entered into a repeated-measures ANOVA with group as the between-subjects factor and session as the within-subjects factor. There was a large effect of group (F(1, 22) = 11.14, MSE = , p.003; all tests were conducted to a criterion of.05.), but no effect of Session (F 1), nor an interaction between the two (F 1). Clearly, participants trained on grammatical sequences retained their reaction-time advantage for old over new sequences over the intervals between test sessions. The mean endorsement rates for grammatical and ungrammatical sequences, and resulting d values are shown in Table 2. The d values were entered into a Table 1. Mean Reactions times for Grammatical and Ungrammatical Test Sequences (Figures in Parentheses Are Standard Errors) Control Trained Interval (days) Grammatical (252.30) (260.96) (276.17) (252.27) (231.40) (215.58) Ungrammatical (260.95) (259.90) (280.62) (237.51) (219.60) (196.83) Priming Ð Ð (20.10) (12.29) (16.84) (29.84) (40.37) (40.81)
5 128 Richard J. Tunney Table 2. Mean Endorsement Rates and d Values for Grammatical and Ungrammatical Test Sequences (Figures in Parentheses Are Standard Errors) Control Trained Interval (days) Grammatical (.04) (.06) (.05) (.03) (.04) (.04) Ungrammatical (.05) (.06) (.06) (.04) (.05) (.04) d 0.10 Ð (0.08) (0.13) (0.10) (0.10) (.08) (0.11) repeated-measures ANOVA with group as the between-subjects factor and session as the within-subjects factor. There was an effect of group (F(1, 22) = , MSE =.224, p.001), an effect of session (F(2, 44) = 5.398, MSE = 0.08, p =.008), and an interaction between the two (F(2, 44) = 3.299, MSE =.254, p =.046). It seems that the trained group s d values decline across sessions. The interaction suggests that initially this decline occurs between sessions 1 and 2, but not between sessions 2 and 3. This is confirmed by a paired-sample t test on the trained group s d values. The d values decrease between sessions 1 and 2 (t(11) = 3.008, SD = 0.425, p.012), but not between sessions 2 and3(t 1). Discussion The present experiment suggests that priming (in the form of motor responses) and recognition decay, or are disrupted, at different rates. Moreover, the decline of d values do not appear to be linear: initially recognition is relatively high, but on the subsequent two sessions the d values, like reaction times, seem to remain constant. Thus the data represent a functional dissociation between priming and recognition in memory for grammatical knowledge. The decline of recognition is consistent with a traditional forgetting function of initial rapid forgetting toward asymptote first described by Ebbinghaus (1885). More recently, Wixted (1990; see also Wixted & Ebbesen, 1991), suggested that this function is a simple power function. Priming may well decay according to the same function but it is clear that the decay constant to fit each curve would be different. How should these data be interpreted? Two possibilities spring to mind. One possibility, is that the data are consistent with a dual-process model of recognition memory of the sort proposed by Gabrieli (1998; see also Knowlton & Squire, 1994). According to this model there are in fact two dissociations present in these data: the first between procedural and declarative memory, and the second between recollective and familiarity components of recognition. The high recognition scores immediately following training are predicated on both familiarity and conscious recollection. The lower recognition scores on subsequent test sessions reflect the decay of conscious recollection, but remain constant and above chance as recognition continues to be supported by priming. Reaction times remain constant because they are supported by familiarity but not conscious recollection. This interpretation is consistent with the experiment reported by Higham et al. (2000). However, dissociations between different measures of knowledge should not be taken to conclusively demonstrate separable processes until alternative explanations have been explored. A second possibility is that a unitary source of knowledge primes both motor and recognition responses. The dissociation between the two reflects not the source of knowledge, but the different ways of responding. The distinction made by Seger (1998) between judgment and motor responses seems appropriate: Recognition involves a decision whether to say either old or new, and necessarily varies according to the various sensitivities and biases of participants. It seems unlikely that motor responses require any such decisions to be made (although relative speeds may vary and are likely to be subject to noise). By this analysis, the dissociation is due not to different representational schemes but to different ways of accessing that knowledge. Ironically, priming may simply be a more direct and recognition a more indirect test of knowledge. Recently, Shanks and Perruchet (2002) have described a simple mathematical model in which a single source of memory can give rise to dissociations between priming and recognition in serial reaction time learning, although it is not clear whether this model could account for the data reported here. Across sessions the endorsement rates for grammatical sequences are similar for both the trained and control groups. However, the trained group s endorsement rates for ungrammatical sequences
6 Decay of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge 129 increase across sessions. The pattern of endorsement rates might indicate that interference is the cause of the apparent decay of recognition. No such pattern is apparent in the priming data. This may indicate that the form of forgetting differs between the two systems. If so this would exclude a single process explanation, but further research would be required to examine this issue. The data do not resolve these possible interpretations but nonetheless appear to support the claim made by Reber (e.g., 1989; Allen & Reber, 1980), and others (e.g., Berry & Dienes, 1993) that implicit knowledge is more robust in the face of time than explicit knowledge. Learning and memory of this form has traditionally been referred to as implicit, in part because the indirect performance aspect of learning (i.e., priming) is preserved while direct explicit aspect of memory (i.e., recognition) is not. However, these data do not indicate that priming can occur without recognition, thus learning cannot be said to be implicit in the sense that it occurred without awareness: because priming and recognition cooccur across sessions we cannot say that either measure of learning is process pure. Indeed evidence that learning can occur without awareness, as defined by chance recognition performance has been elusive (see Shanks, in press). Thus it has been difficult to demonstrate dissociable processes of priming and recognition. The advantage of investigating the rate of decay of these two forms of memory is that chance performance on one or the other measures is not required to demonstrate that they are dissociable systems. Previous research (e.g., Nissen et al. 1989; Willingham & Dumas, 1997) has shown that priming can be retained over relatively long periods of time. The data reported here, are the first to show that recognition of the same information, while persisting for a similar length of time, shows a very different pattern of forgetting. In this sense, the data reported here support the long held view that at least some form of implicit knowledge can be retained for longer periods than explicit knowledge. References Adams, J. A. (1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 41Ð74. Allen, R., & Reber, A. S. (1980). Very long-term memory for tacit knowledge. Cognition, 8, 175Ð185. Berry, D. C., & Dienes, Z. (1993). Implicit learning: Theoretical and empirical issues. Hove, UK: LEA. Brooks, L. R., & Vokey, J. R. (1991). Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber (1989) and Mathews et al (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 373Ð383. Cleeremans, A. (1993). Mechanisms of implicit learning: Connectionist models of sequence processing. Cambridge: MIT Press. Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 343Ð350. Dulany, D. E., Carlson, R. C., & Dewey, G. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgement: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541Ð555. Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. (H. A Reuger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885). Foster, J. K., & Jelicic, M. (Eds.) (1999). Memory: Systems, Process, or Function? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gabrieli, J. D. E (1998). Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 87Ð115. Higham, P. A., Vokey, J. R., & Pritchard, J. L. (2000). Beyond dissociation logic: Evidence for controlled and automatic influences in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 457Ð470. Knopman, D. (1991). Long-term retention of implicitly acquired learning in patients with Alzheimer s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 880Ð894. Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 79Ð91. McBride, D. M., & Dosher, B. A. (1997). A comparison of forgetting in an implicit and explicit memory task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 371Ð392. Nissen, M. J., Willingham, D. B., & Hartman, M. (1989). Explicit and implicit remembering: When is learning preserved in amnesia? Neuropsychologia, 27, 341Ð 352. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264Ð275. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219Ð235. Reber, A. S., & Allen, R. (1978). Analogic and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation. Cognition, 6, 189Ð221. Seger, C. A. (1998). Independent judgment-linked and motor-linked forms of artificial grammar learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 259Ð284. Shanks, D. R. (in press). Implicit learning. In K. Lamberts & R. Goldstone (eds.), Handbook of Cognition. London: Sage. Shanks, D. R., & Perruchet, P. (2002). Dissociation between priming and recognition in the expression of sequential knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 362Ð368. Tulving, E., Schacter, D., & Stark, H. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 336Ð342. Willingham, D. B., & Dumas, J. A. (1997). Long-term retention of a motor skill: Implicit sequence knowledge
7 130 Richard J. Tunney is not retained after a one-year delay. Psychological Research, 60, 113Ð119. Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1047Ð1060. Wixted, J. T. (1990). Analyzing the empirical course of forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 927Ð935. Wixted, J. T., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1991). On the form of forgetting. Psychological Science, 2, 409Ð415. Richard J. Tunney Department of Psychology Keele University Keele Staffordshire, ST5 5BG United Kingdom Tel.: Fax: r.tunney@keele.ac.uk Received 14 June, 2002 Revision received 9 September, 2002 Accepted 4 October, 2002
Running head: DELAY AND PROSPECTIVE MEMORY 1
Running head: DELAY AND PROSPECTIVE MEMORY 1 In Press at Memory & Cognition Effects of Delay of Prospective Memory Cues in an Ongoing Task on Prospective Memory Task Performance Dawn M. McBride, Jaclyn
More informationComparison Between Three Memory Tests: Cued Recall, Priming and Saving Closed-Head Injured Patients and Controls
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1380-3395/03/2502-274$16.00 2003, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 274 282 # Swets & Zeitlinger Comparison Between Three Memory Tests: Cued Recall, Priming and Saving
More informationHow Does Physical Space Influence the Novices' and Experts' Algebraic Reasoning?
Journal of European Psychology Students, 2013, 4, 37-46 How Does Physical Space Influence the Novices' and Experts' Algebraic Reasoning? Mihaela Taranu Babes-Bolyai University, Romania Received: 30.09.2011
More informationAn Empirical and Computational Test of Linguistic Relativity
An Empirical and Computational Test of Linguistic Relativity Kathleen M. Eberhard* (eberhard.1@nd.edu) Matthias Scheutz** (mscheutz@cse.nd.edu) Michael Heilman** (mheilman@nd.edu) *Department of Psychology,
More informationAGENDA LEARNING THEORIES LEARNING THEORIES. Advanced Learning Theories 2/22/2016
AGENDA Advanced Learning Theories Alejandra J. Magana, Ph.D. admagana@purdue.edu Introduction to Learning Theories Role of Learning Theories and Frameworks Learning Design Research Design Dual Coding Theory
More informationDoes the Difficulty of an Interruption Affect our Ability to Resume?
Difficulty of Interruptions 1 Does the Difficulty of an Interruption Affect our Ability to Resume? David M. Cades Deborah A. Boehm Davis J. Gregory Trafton Naval Research Laboratory Christopher A. Monk
More informationThe New Theory of Disuse Predicts Retrieval Enhanced Suggestibility (RES)
Seton Hall University erepository @ Seton Hall Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs) Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses Spring 5-1-2017 The New Theory of Disuse Predicts Retrieval
More informationTesting protects against proactive interference in face name learning
Psychon Bull Rev (2011) 18:518 523 DOI 10.3758/s13423-011-0085-x Testing protects against proactive interference in face name learning Yana Weinstein & Kathleen B. McDermott & Karl K. Szpunar Published
More informationSOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL
SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL Kyle Higgins Randall Boone University of Nevada Las Vegas rboone@unlv.nevada.edu Higgins@unlv.nevada.edu N.B. This form has not been fully validated and is still in development.
More informationHow to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test
How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test Technical Bulletin #6 Evaluation and Examination Service The University of Iowa (319) 335-0356 HOW TO JUDGE THE QUALITY OF AN OBJECTIVE CLASSROOM
More informationAbstractions and the Brain
Abstractions and the Brain Brian D. Josephson Department of Physics, University of Cambridge Cavendish Lab. Madingley Road Cambridge, UK. CB3 OHE bdj10@cam.ac.uk http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10 ABSTRACT
More informationFirms and Markets Saturdays Summer I 2014
PRELIMINARY DRAFT VERSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE. Firms and Markets Saturdays Summer I 2014 Professor Thomas Pugel Office: Room 11-53 KMC E-mail: tpugel@stern.nyu.edu Tel: 212-998-0918 Fax: 212-995-4212 This
More informationRote rehearsal and spacing effects in the free recall of pure and mixed lists. By: Peter P.J.L. Verkoeijen and Peter F. Delaney
Rote rehearsal and spacing effects in the free recall of pure and mixed lists By: Peter P.J.L. Verkoeijen and Peter F. Delaney Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L, & Delaney, P. F. (2008). Rote rehearsal and spacing
More informationIs Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?
DOI 10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1 Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference? Joyce M. Oates 1 & Zehra F. Peynircioğlu 1 & Kathryn B. Bates 1 # Springer Science+Business Media New
More informationThe College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12
A Correlation of, 2017 To the Redesigned SAT Introduction This document demonstrates how myperspectives English Language Arts meets the Reading, Writing and Language and Essay Domains of Redesigned SAT.
More informationOhio s Learning Standards-Clear Learning Targets
Ohio s Learning Standards-Clear Learning Targets Math Grade 1 Use addition and subtraction within 20 to solve word problems involving situations of 1.OA.1 adding to, taking from, putting together, taking
More information10.2. Behavior models
User behavior research 10.2. Behavior models Overview Why do users seek information? How do they seek information? How do they search for information? How do they use libraries? These questions are addressed
More informationProbability estimates in a scenario tree
101 Chapter 11 Probability estimates in a scenario tree An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field. Niels Bohr (1885 1962) Scenario trees require many numbers.
More informationMandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm
Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 0 (008), p. 8 Abstract Mandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm Yuwen Lai and Jie Zhang University of Kansas Research on spoken word recognition
More informationNCEO Technical Report 27
Home About Publications Special Topics Presentations State Policies Accommodations Bibliography Teleconferences Tools Related Sites Interpreting Trends in the Performance of Special Education Students
More informationPresentation Format Effects in a Levels-of-Processing Task
P.W. Foos ExperimentalP & P. Goolkasian: sychology 2008 Presentation Hogrefe 2008; Vol. & Huber Format 55(4):215 227 Publishers Effects Presentation Format Effects in a Levels-of-Processing Task Paul W.
More informationBENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT: CARNEGIE PEER INSTITUTIONS, 2003-2011 PREPARED BY: ANGEL A. SANCHEZ, DIRECTOR KELLI PAYNE, ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST/ SPECIALIST
More informationEncoding. Retrieval. Forgetting. Physiology of Memory. Systems and Types of Memory
Encoding Storage Retrieval Forgetting Encoding Storage Retrieval Fraction of red lights missed 0.08 Encoding 0.06 Getting information into memory 0.04 0.02 0 No cell phone With cell phone Divided Attention
More informationLearning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,
Dear Doctor, I have been asked to formulate a vocational opinion regarding NAME s employability in light of his/her learning disability. To assist me with this evaluation I would appreciate if you can
More informationSource-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: Evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory
Memory & Cognition 2007, 35 (2), 211-221 Source-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: Evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory MARY ANN FOLEY AND HUGH J. FOLEY
More informationStrategy Abandonment Effects in Cued Recall
Strategy Abandonment Effects in Cued Recall Stephanie A. Robinson* a, Amy A. Overman a,, & Joseph D.W. Stephens b a Department of Psychology, Elon University, NC b Department of Psychology, North Carolina
More informationAge Effects on Syntactic Control in. Second Language Learning
Age Effects on Syntactic Control in Second Language Learning Miriam Tullgren Loyola University Chicago Abstract 1 This paper explores the effects of age on second language acquisition in adolescents, ages
More informationCued Recall From Image and Sentence Memory: A Shift From Episodic to Identical Elements Representation
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, Vol. 32, No. 4, 734 748 Copyright 2006 by the American Psychological Association 0278-7393/06/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.734
More informationLevels-of-Processing Effects on a Variety of Memory Tasks: New Findings and Theoretical Implications
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION 5, 142 164 (1996) ARTICLE NO. 0009 Levels-of-Processing Effects on a Variety of Memory Tasks: New Findings and Theoretical Implications BRADFORD H. CHALLIS 1 Institute of Psychology,
More informationLongitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers
F I N A L R E P O R T Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers July 8, 2014 Elias Walsh Dallas Dotter Submitted to: DC Education Consortium for Research and Evaluation School of Education
More informationExtending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000
Grade 4 Mathematics, Quarter 1, Unit 1.1 Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000 Overview Number of Instructional Days: 10 (1 day = 45 minutes) Content to Be Learned Recognize that a digit
More informationLevels of processing: Qualitative differences or task-demand differences?
Memory & Cognition 1983,11 (3),316-323 Levels of processing: Qualitative differences or task-demand differences? SHANNON DAWN MOESER Memorial University ofnewfoundland, St. John's, NewfoundlandAlB3X8,
More informationAuthor: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015
Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) www.angielskiwmedycynie.org.pl Feb 2015 Developing speaking abilities is a prerequisite for HELP in order to promote effective communication
More informationThe Power Integration Diffusion Model for Production Breaks
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied Copyright 2002 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 2002, Vol. 8, No. 2, 118 126 1076-898X/02/$5.00 DOI: 10.1037//1076-898X.8.2.118 The Power Integration
More informationDyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital. Guidance and Information for Teachers
Dyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital Guidance and Information for Teachers Digital Tests from GL Assessment For fully comprehensive information about using digital tests from GL Assessment, please
More informationAn Evaluation of the Interactive-Activation Model Using Masked Partial-Word Priming. Jason R. Perry. University of Western Ontario. Stephen J.
An Evaluation of the Interactive-Activation Model Using Masked Partial-Word Priming Jason R. Perry University of Western Ontario Stephen J. Lupker University of Western Ontario Colin J. Davis Royal Holloway
More informationLanguage Acquisition Chart
Language Acquisition Chart This chart was designed to help teachers better understand the process of second language acquisition. Please use this chart as a resource for learning more about the way people
More informationRecommended Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Children with Learning Disabilities
Recommended Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Children with Learning Disabilities Bill Colvin, Mary Sue Crawford, Oliver Foese, Tim Hogan, Stephen James, Jack Kamrad, Maria Kokai, Carolyn Lennox, David Schwartzbein
More informationA. What is research? B. Types of research
A. What is research? Research = the process of finding solutions to a problem after a thorough study and analysis (Sekaran, 2006). Research = systematic inquiry that provides information to guide decision
More informationImproved Effects of Word-Retrieval Treatments Subsequent to Addition of the Orthographic Form
Orthographic Form 1 Improved Effects of Word-Retrieval Treatments Subsequent to Addition of the Orthographic Form The development and testing of word-retrieval treatments for aphasia has generally focused
More informationAdults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) often have word retrieval problems (Barrow, et al., 2003; 2006; King, et al., 2006a; 2006b; Levin et al.
Adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) often have word retrieval problems (Barrow, et al., 2003; 2006; King, et al., 2006a; 2006b; Levin et al., 1981). Pattern of these difficulties has not been clearly
More informationRule Learning With Negation: Issues Regarding Effectiveness
Rule Learning With Negation: Issues Regarding Effectiveness S. Chua, F. Coenen, G. Malcolm University of Liverpool Department of Computer Science, Ashton Building, Ashton Street, L69 3BX Liverpool, United
More informationTo appear in The TESOL encyclopedia of ELT (Wiley-Blackwell) 1 RECASTING. Kazuya Saito. Birkbeck, University of London
To appear in The TESOL encyclopedia of ELT (Wiley-Blackwell) 1 RECASTING Kazuya Saito Birkbeck, University of London Abstract Among the many corrective feedback techniques at ESL/EFL teachers' disposal,
More informationThe Good Judgment Project: A large scale test of different methods of combining expert predictions
The Good Judgment Project: A large scale test of different methods of combining expert predictions Lyle Ungar, Barb Mellors, Jon Baron, Phil Tetlock, Jaime Ramos, Sam Swift The University of Pennsylvania
More informationA Comparison of the Effects of Two Practice Session Distribution Types on Acquisition and Retention of Discrete and Continuous Skills
Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 8 (1): 222-227, 2011 ISSN 1990-9233 IDOSI Publications, 2011 A Comparison of the Effects of Two Practice Session Distribution Types on Acquisition and Retention
More informationEvolution of Symbolisation in Chimpanzees and Neural Nets
Evolution of Symbolisation in Chimpanzees and Neural Nets Angelo Cangelosi Centre for Neural and Adaptive Systems University of Plymouth (UK) a.cangelosi@plymouth.ac.uk Introduction Animal communication
More informationEvaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program
Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program Sarah Garner University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 Michael J. Tremmel University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 Sarah
More informationIndividual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION
L I S T E N I N G Individual Component Checklist for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION INTRODUCTION This checklist has been designed for use as a practical tool for describing ONE TASK in a test of listening.
More informationIntroduction to Ensemble Learning Featuring Successes in the Netflix Prize Competition
Introduction to Ensemble Learning Featuring Successes in the Netflix Prize Competition Todd Holloway Two Lecture Series for B551 November 20 & 27, 2007 Indiana University Outline Introduction Bias and
More informationMiami-Dade County Public Schools
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND THEIR ACADEMIC PROGRESS: 2010-2011 Author: Aleksandr Shneyderman, Ed.D. January 2012 Research Services Office of Assessment, Research, and Data Analysis 1450 NE Second Avenue,
More informationParadoxical Effects of Testing: Retrieval Enhances Both Accurate Recall and Suggestibility in Eyewitnesses
Psychology Publications Psychology 1-2011 Paradoxical Effects of Testing: Retrieval Enhances Both Accurate Recall and Suggestibility in Eyewitnesses Jason C.K. Chan Iowa State University, ckchan@iastate.edu
More informationExecutive Guide to Simulation for Health
Executive Guide to Simulation for Health Simulation is used by Healthcare and Human Service organizations across the World to improve their systems of care and reduce costs. Simulation offers evidence
More informationSchool Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide
SPECIAL EDUCATION School Year 2017/18 DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION Training Guide Revision: July, 2017 Table of Contents DDS Student Application Key Concepts and Understanding... 3 Access to
More informationDIDACTIC MODEL BRIDGING A CONCEPT WITH PHENOMENA
DIDACTIC MODEL BRIDGING A CONCEPT WITH PHENOMENA Beba Shternberg, Center for Educational Technology, Israel Michal Yerushalmy University of Haifa, Israel The article focuses on a specific method of constructing
More information***** Article in press in Neural Networks ***** BOTTOM-UP LEARNING OF EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE USING A BAYESIAN ALGORITHM AND A NEW HEBBIAN LEARNING RULE
Bottom-up learning of explicit knowledge 1 ***** Article in press in Neural Networks ***** BOTTOM-UP LEARNING OF EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE USING A BAYESIAN ALGORITHM AND A NEW HEBBIAN LEARNING RULE Sébastien
More informationLearning and Retaining New Vocabularies: The Case of Monolingual and Bilingual Dictionaries
Learning and Retaining New Vocabularies: The Case of Monolingual and Bilingual Dictionaries Mohsen Mobaraki Assistant Professor, University of Birjand, Iran mmobaraki@birjand.ac.ir *Amin Saed Lecturer,
More informationYMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN
YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN (normal view is landscape, not portrait) SCHOOL AGE DOMAIN SKILLS ARE SOCIAL: COMMUNICATION, LANGUAGE AND LITERACY: EMOTIONAL: COGNITIVE: PHYSICAL: DEVELOPMENTAL
More informationSummary / Response. Karl Smith, Accelerations Educational Software. Page 1 of 8
Summary / Response This is a study of 2 autistic students to see if they can generalize what they learn on the DT Trainer to their physical world. One student did automatically generalize and the other
More informationModule 12. Machine Learning. Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur
Module 12 Machine Learning 12.1 Instructional Objective The students should understand the concept of learning systems Students should learn about different aspects of a learning system Students should
More informationMath-U-See Correlation with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Content for Third Grade
Math-U-See Correlation with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Content for Third Grade The third grade standards primarily address multiplication and division, which are covered in Math-U-See
More informationThe Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical. Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University
The Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University Kifah Rakan Alqadi Al Al-Bayt University Faculty of Arts Department of English Language
More informationWorkload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007
Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007 Workload expectations for faculty in the Department of Art and Art History, in the areas of teaching, research, and service, must be consistent
More informationDOES RETELLING TECHNIQUE IMPROVE SPEAKING FLUENCY?
DOES RETELLING TECHNIQUE IMPROVE SPEAKING FLUENCY? Noor Rachmawaty (itaw75123@yahoo.com) Istanti Hermagustiana (dulcemaria_81@yahoo.com) Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia Abstract: This paper is based
More informationSystematic reviews in theory and practice for library and information studies
Systematic reviews in theory and practice for library and information studies Sue F. Phelps, Nicole Campbell Abstract This article is about the use of systematic reviews as a research methodology in library
More informationSpeech Recognition at ICSI: Broadcast News and beyond
Speech Recognition at ICSI: Broadcast News and beyond Dan Ellis International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley CA Outline 1 2 3 The DARPA Broadcast News task Aspects of ICSI
More informationMPA Internship Handbook AY
MPA Internship Handbook AY 2017-2018 Introduction The primary purpose of the MPA internship is to provide students with a meaningful experience in which they can apply what they have learned in the classroom
More informationCalculators in a Middle School Mathematics Classroom: Helpful or Harmful?
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Action Research Projects Math in the Middle Institute Partnership 7-2008 Calculators in a Middle School Mathematics Classroom:
More informationCELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom
CELTA Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines Third Edition CELTA (Certificate in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages) is accredited by Ofqual (the regulator of qualifications, examinations and
More informationAssessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight
Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development Ben Knight Speaking skills are often considered the most important part of an EFL course, and yet the difficulties in testing oral skills
More informationWhat is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:
What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract: The purpose of this study was look at the impact of English and math courses and grades on retention in the STEM major after one
More informationThe Role of Test Expectancy in the Build-Up of Proactive Interference in Long-Term Memory
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2014, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1039 1048 2014 American Psychological Association 0278-7393/14/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0036164 The Role of Test Expectancy
More informationLongitudinal family-risk studies of dyslexia: why. develop dyslexia and others don t.
The Dyslexia Handbook 2013 69 Aryan van der Leij, Elsje van Bergen and Peter de Jong Longitudinal family-risk studies of dyslexia: why some children develop dyslexia and others don t. Longitudinal family-risk
More informationBaker College Waiver Form Office Copy Secondary Teacher Preparation Mathematics / Social Studies Double Major Bachelor of Science
Baker College Waiver Form Office Copy Secondary Teacher Preparation Mathematics / Social Studies Double Major Bachelor of Science NAME: UIN: Acknowledgment Form - Open Enrollment Program By initialing
More informationA Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many
Schmidt 1 Eric Schmidt Prof. Suzanne Flynn Linguistic Study of Bilingualism December 13, 2013 A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one.
More informationA Study of Metacognitive Awareness of Non-English Majors in L2 Listening
ISSN 1798-4769 Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 504-510, May 2013 Manufactured in Finland. doi:10.4304/jltr.4.3.504-510 A Study of Metacognitive Awareness of Non-English Majors
More informationWhy PPP won t (and shouldn t) go away
(and shouldn t) go IATEFL Birmingham 2016 jasonanderson1@gmail.com www.jasonanderson.org.uk speakinggames.wordpress.com Structure of my talk 1. Introduction 3. Why is it so enduring / popular? (i.e. Does
More informationExtending Learning Across Time & Space: The Power of Generalization
Extending Learning: The Power of Generalization 1 Extending Learning Across Time & Space: The Power of Generalization Teachers have every right to celebrate when they finally succeed in teaching struggling
More informationStrategy for teaching communication skills in dentistry
Strategy for teaching communication in dentistry SADJ July 2010, Vol 65 No 6 p260 - p265 Prof. JG White: Head: Department of Dental Management Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Pretoria, E-mail:
More informationInformatics 2A: Language Complexity and the. Inf2A: Chomsky Hierarchy
Informatics 2A: Language Complexity and the Chomsky Hierarchy September 28, 2010 Starter 1 Is there a finite state machine that recognises all those strings s from the alphabet {a, b} where the difference
More informationSelf Study Report Computer Science
Computer Science undergraduate students have access to undergraduate teaching, and general computing facilities in three buildings. Two large classrooms are housed in the Davis Centre, which hold about
More informationProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 146 ( 2014 )
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 146 ( 2014 ) 456 460 Third Annual International Conference «Early Childhood Care and Education» Different
More informationShort-term memory in Down syndrome: Applying the working memory model
17 Short-term memory in Down syndrome: Applying the working memory model Christopher Jarrold and Alan D. Baddeley Centre for the Study of Memory and Learning, Department of Psychology, University of Bristol
More informationIntroduction to HPSG. Introduction. Historical Overview. The HPSG architecture. Signature. Linguistic Objects. Descriptions.
to as a linguistic theory to to a member of the family of linguistic frameworks that are called generative grammars a grammar which is formalized to a high degree and thus makes exact predictions about
More informationIntensive Writing Class
Intensive Writing Class Student Profile: This class is for students who are committed to improving their writing. It is for students whose writing has been identified as their weakest skill and whose CASAS
More informationEffective Instruction for Struggling Readers
Section II Effective Instruction for Struggling Readers Chapter 5 Components of Effective Instruction After conducting assessments, Ms. Lopez should be aware of her students needs in the following areas:
More informationMinistry of Education General Administration for Private Education ELT Supervision
Ministry of Education General Administration for Private Education ELT Supervision Reflective teaching An important asset to professional development Introduction Reflective practice is viewed as a means
More informationConsultation skills teaching in primary care TEACHING CONSULTING SKILLS * * * * INTRODUCTION
Education for Primary Care (2013) 24: 206 18 2013 Radcliffe Publishing Limited Teaching exchange We start this time with the last of Paul Silverston s articles about undergraduate teaching in primary care.
More informationUDL AND LANGUAGE ARTS LESSON OVERVIEW
UDL AND LANGUAGE ARTS LESSON OVERVIEW Title: Reading Comprehension Author: Carol Sue Englert Subject: Language Arts Grade Level 3 rd grade Duration 60 minutes Unit Description Focusing on the students
More informationI N T E R P R E T H O G A N D E V E L O P HOGAN BUSINESS REASONING INVENTORY. Report for: Martina Mustermann ID: HC Date: May 02, 2017
S E L E C T D E V E L O P L E A D H O G A N D E V E L O P I N T E R P R E T HOGAN BUSINESS REASONING INVENTORY Report for: Martina Mustermann ID: HC906276 Date: May 02, 2017 2 0 0 9 H O G A N A S S E S
More information4. Some information in our fleeting is encoded into short-term memory. A) repressed memory B) sensory memory C) flashbulb memory D) long-term memory
Name: Date: 1. The persistence of learning over time most clearly depends on A) the serial position effect. C) visual encoding. D) memory. 2. The process of encoding refers to A) the persistence of learning
More informationRunning head: DEVELOPING MULTIPLICATION AUTOMATICTY 1. Examining the Impact of Frustration Levels on Multiplication Automaticity.
Running head: DEVELOPING MULTIPLICATION AUTOMATICTY 1 Examining the Impact of Frustration Levels on Multiplication Automaticity Jessica Hanna Eastern Illinois University DEVELOPING MULTIPLICATION AUTOMATICITY
More informationPromoting Active Learning in University Classes
Promoting Active Learning in University Classes Dr Tony Morrison EDC, January 11 Introduction This workshop follows on from the four earlier 'active learning' workshops conducted in EDC. Approximately
More informationRule Learning with Negation: Issues Regarding Effectiveness
Rule Learning with Negation: Issues Regarding Effectiveness Stephanie Chua, Frans Coenen, and Grant Malcolm University of Liverpool Department of Computer Science, Ashton Building, Ashton Street, L69 3BX
More informationImplicit Proactive Interference, Age, and Automatic Versus Controlled Retrieval Strategies Simay Ikier, 1 Lixia Yang, 2 and Lynn Hasher 3,4
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Implicit Proactive Interference, Age, and Automatic Versus Controlled Retrieval Strategies Simay Ikier, 1 Lixia Yang, 2 and Lynn Hasher 3,4 1 Yeditepe University,
More information2,1 .,,, , %, ,,,,,,. . %., Butterworth,)?.(1989; Levelt, 1989; Levelt et al., 1991; Levelt, Roelofs & Meyer, 1999
23-47 57 (2006)? : 1 21 2 1 : ( ) $ % 24 ( ) 200 ( ) ) ( % : % % % Butterworth)? (1989; Levelt 1989; Levelt et al 1991; Levelt Roelofs & Meyer 1999 () " 2 ) ( ) ( Brown & McNeill 1966; Morton 1969 1979;
More informationCLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction
CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1 Program Name: Macmillan/McGraw Hill Reading 2003 Date of Publication: 2003 Publisher: Macmillan/McGraw Hill Reviewer Code: 1. X The program meets
More informationThe Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance
The Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance James J. Kemple, Corinne M. Herlihy Executive Summary June 2004 In many
More informationEvidence for Reliability, Validity and Learning Effectiveness
PEARSON EDUCATION Evidence for Reliability, Validity and Learning Effectiveness Introduction Pearson Knowledge Technologies has conducted a large number and wide variety of reliability and validity studies
More informationNorms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?
Frequently Asked Questions Today s education environment demands proven tools that promote quality decision making and boost your ability to positively impact student achievement. TerraNova, Third Edition
More information